#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages Β· Page 82 of 1
oh
or this one
im not sure how to find asymptotes or plot
i only know how to get the 3 points
stuck here
not sure where to go from here
ive been trying for hours and nothing online does the problem like how my teacher said
This can be done using graph transformation
Yes, but it was about proving that definition and seeing where it comes from.
.... you dont prove definitions?
definitions are just definitions
A system which believes that is essentially "because I said so." Now it is faith based. cΒ²=aΒ²+bΒ² is also a definition. Yet there are many proofs for it. Should we have simply accepted the definition?
.... the pythogorean theorem isnt a definition
Its a theorem
That is also a definition
Just did. Does not refute. Essentially says all theorems are definitions but not all definitions are theorems. This sismply tells me that I was looking for someone to prove the Dot Product definition, thus making it a theorem. Which makes sense, since it's a deluxe version of the Pythagorean Theorem.
It's like you're arguing squares aren't rectangles.
Thank you.
From Khan academy:
y = Asin(Bx-C) + D
y = Acos(Bx-C) + D
From the web:
y = Asin[B(x-C)] + D
y = Acos[B(x-C)] + D
Which of these are correct?
they're the same thing written in different ways
B(x - C) = Bx - (BC)
but only B(x - C) has the horizontal translation being C units to the right
oh
I learnt the first one from khanacdemy, and found the latter from few math websites
so i should stick with khan academy's one?
the web one is more useful I feel
oh, I see
what does the cartesian equation of a circle represent? (radius, circumference, etc.)
Hii can someone explain to me how does pie and rad even connects with trigonometry? I missed the lesson bcs of a competition
Oh and the question basically ask what's the value of p
- 29/36
theyre both just different units to measure angles, heres the definition for them:
One rad is 180* right
and about trig in this, say that you have these 120Β°, if we'd wonna convert it to radians we could just use the formula to get 2/3Ο, now if youd want to find the sin(120Β°) itd be the same as sin(β Ο) which from the tables we know is equal to β3/2
one rad is 180Β°/pi in degrees
when you look at the graphs of trig functions pi is used more so as a unit on the x axis
pi radians is 180 degrees
Thanks!! forgot to reply and i did great in my math test today haha
Me and my friend are having an argument about if a rectangle can be a square
I said no but he said sometimes
If a rectangle is a square then itβs a square and not a rectangle (what I concluded)
a square is both a square and a rectangle
shapes can belong to multiple different categories at once
But can a rectangle be a square?
yes, because all squares are rectangles
But is a rectangle a square?
can it be a square? yes. is it always a square? no
Iβm gonna ask my teacher π
all squares are rectangles, but only some rectangles are squares
just like all apples are fruit, but only some fruit are apples
Alr ty for the help
a rectangle is a square in the same way that a cat is a cheetah lol
no wait
there fixed
all squares are rectangles the same way that all cheetahs are cats
:>
Don't think so a rectangle is not a square as all the sides aren't the same
If a tree falls and no one has witnessed it did the tree really fall
Ur friend is right
This can be solved with a 5 second Google search
No need to talk to your teacher
Can someone tell me if a triangles area is 3 times bigger than another does that mean the sides are 3 times bigger aswell or no
no
Darn
for which part
oh c
because you know the area of ABC, you know the area of CAD
do you know a formula for triangle area?
(1/2)baseΓheight?
yes!
id ratio of the squares of correspond sides is equivalent to the ratio of the areas of similar triangles
π€
are u ok
I'm trying to understand π
ok welllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
you know A, right? of CAD
A = area
because it is 1/3 the area of the other triangle
Yeah
and do you knwo the base or height?
The base yeah
i never got the point of giving angles like 85 or 38
Woah that looks nasty
Wanna try it out with me?
I'm gonna go brush my teeth and wash my face
Way ahead of you
give this problem a go
oh u already began?
Do you have the answer
yes i have the answers
Is it D
nope
B?
partially
What the hel
l
I was like there's two answers
But D is the most true I thought
It checks out
Just sub it in
r2+r3=12
Then I made r2=d
and r3=2d
x+2x=12
x=4
r1,r2,r3 goes as 2 4 8
In a geometric sequence
It even looks like that in the diagram
nah it's BC
How the hell does C work when we got little to no information
And D doens't check out????
Tasty question
There is some formula for the length of QR right ?
Length of direct common tangent
Could you type out what that is
,rccw
There
You could work out from there I suppose
And since you know PQ,
And that tan(theta/2) = r1/PQ
You can substitute it
:))
@lyric halo
,rccw
And for D,it's going to be quite lengthy
Sub value of r1 into pq and replace it in this equation
Simplify simplify simpligy
And you will get it
I guess so :p
There is probably a shorter method for this
@lyric halo wake up
Dang felt good
π₯²
Ping me if you figure out how to do A
you need calculus, bud
apply the arc length formula on $(a \cos t, a \sin t, bt)$
Hm
south, just south
What's the formula tho
$\int_0^T \sqrt{(dx/dt)^2+(dy/dt)^2+(dz/dt)^2} \ dt$
south, just south
All I know is that you deffericiate I think
it's based on 3D Pythagoras
Oh thanks alot
What if the helix cuts the cylinder
Is there someway to know the permiter of the shape it makes
it wouldn't be a helix then
oh wait ok
but I still don't get what you mean
Like let's say the cylinder is hollow right
And you grab scissors and cut the helix
What's the permiter of the shape
ohhhhh okay
I did this but it's wrong
How do you measure the length of a spiral on a cylinder? There is a neat trick!
If you like my videos, you can support me at Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/mindyourdecisions
Connect on social media. I update each site when I have a new video or blog post, so you can follow me on whichever method is most convenient for you.
My Blog: http://mi...
you don't need calculus then
what you said made me realise
if you unroll the cylinder, the helix will be a straight line on a rectangle
so when you cut it, you get two congruent right triangles
I looked at that but it doesn't make sense
I cut up a cylinder and it makes a parallelogram
this is useful if the number of revolutions is not a whole number
it's not a parallelogram
It does make it tho
That video is only 1 revolution
oh okay so you want to do it in general
ohhh
I keep getting it wrong for some reason
This is what I know so far
I hope that's right
About the sides of the quadrilateral π΄π΅πΆπ· it is known that π΄π΅ = π΅πΆ and πΆπ· = π΄π·. The diagonal π΄πΆ divides this quadrilateral into two triangles: equilateral and right. The side of the equilateral triangle is 6. Calculate the area of ββthe quadrilateral π΄π΅πΆπ·. - pls explain me how to do this ( I should be able to do this knowing that the height of a 90 60 30 triangle is bβ3 and the hypotenuse of a 90 45 45 triangle is aβ2 )
Draw a figure
thats the main reason I'm here... I can't
@cedar quarry so sorry to disturb u but do u know this
I mean I dont know how to
Have you tried to?
alr
@proper gale
I assumed that ABC was the equilateral triangle
and that ACD was the right angled triangle
Now since AD = DC
the only angle which could be 90 degree was ADC
and since AD = DC
the rest two angles are equal to 45 degrees
so yeah, question solved
is it possible that the ADC angle = 90? idk it just doesnt look like it is
Hey guys?
oh wait nvm it is possible
thanks
idk I overcomplicated it lol
I was able to do the abc but I couldnt figure out how to do the right triangle
I didn't notice it can be an isosceles
thanks
Yo
YO
Sup
p = cot(x), q = tan(x)
If, tan(pi* p) = cot(pi* q) then show that,
tan(x) = 1/4 (2n + 1 plus/minus β(4nΒ² + 4n - 15)) ,
Where, n β Z and n < - 2 or, n > 1
dawg u gotta use latex
do you have any idea how to prof this:
THEOREM:
Any pair of non-concentric circles can be inverted into themselves in an infinite number of ways.
into each other? or themselves?
someone help pls
1 rad
yeah sector OBD - (sector ABC - triangle AOB)
nope
do you recall the circle theorem about the angle on the circumference being....
twice angle at the centre
other way around
angle at the centre is twice angle on the circumference
yeh i mean
cool so then you need 1/2 ab sin C for triangle AOB
ah you also need the cosine rule (or two congruent right triangles) to find side AB, which is the radius of sector BAC
that should be enough info for you to try
get it let me try
10.518 cm^2
OCB = 8.7354 cm^2 ig
final answer 3.76
,calc 1/2 * 5 * 5 * sin(pi - 1)
Result:
10.518387310099
Result:
8.7758256189037
,calc 4 * (pi(2^3))
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: 'pi' is not a function; its value is:
Result:
100.53088
correvt
,calc 4 * (pi*(2^3))
Result:
100.53096491487
just add a *
ohh
otherwise it thinks you are trying to use pi as a function name
Results:
6 B
2
,calc is not advanced enough for that. you can replace ,calc with ,w and it will be able to process that
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Unexpected operator not (char 4)
,w B*6
B=2
look at the "input" section to see how it interpreted it
i would edit the command to have a comma, that would make it realize they are separate equations
I don't really see how, and why, we jump from the familiar definitions of trigonometric functions in the context of unit circle (sine of angle theta corresponds to the y coordinate of the point theta goes to on the unit circle) to these in the picture. Suddenly r joins the party. Can someone clarify things a little bit for me?
oh you just scale the entire unit circle by a factor of r in all directions
so if the hypotenuse increases by r, the opposite side must also increase by r
instead of just y = sin theta, we now have y = r sin theta
similarly for everything else
I was working on a problem yesterday
tan(theta) was given as -2/3
I assumed the point was on the unit circle and made all the calculations on top of that
I got the answer wrong
correct
then you must have went wrong somewhere else
did you check your theta was in the right quadrant?
Yep
wait which quadrant is specified then
Gimme a sec
When I got beyond the unit circle in the second try, I got it right
Considering the r as well, which turns out to be β13
okay so the x-coordinate is positive, so that would be theta in the 4th quadrant
yeah you drew a right triangle with opp = 2 and adj = 3 right
then yes the hypotenuse is β13
that's the most natural method I feel
Given that tan(theta) reveals the x and y coordinate of the point, yes I just applied Pythagorean theorem
yes
but then the question you did is not really related to $x = r \cos \theta, y = r \sin \theta$ I feel
south, just south
you're just using the fact that the angle is the same as long as opp/adj is constant
so the triangle can be scaled up to have hypotenuse = whatever
Don't the broader definitions of TFs stand upon that anyway
yeah
So the upshot is that the data obtained from natural phenomena aren't necessarily compatible with a unit circle
That's why we extend our definitions beyond it
Am I right
I don't know what you mean by that
it's just that the unit circle is a special case of (x, y) = (r cos theta, r sin theta), when r = 1
(also ignore the i, that has to do with the real-complex plane, which is the same as the xy-plane but you have complex numbers)
this gives us a coordinate system that is called polar coordinates
and polar coordinates are super useful
We use those functions to model things
oh yes correct
And that must require us to extend our definitions as much as we can. I don't know which came before: unit circle or the broader approach, but it's sure that the latter is what makes trigonometry useful
Maybe the unit circle is just devised as an introductory concept to make the following material easier to consume
Because it surely did so for me
yes I think this is true also
most people start with SOHCAHTOA
and then they realise through practice that cos and sin can be defined through the unit circle, by making the WLOG assumption that hypotenuse = 1
then if you scale everything by r you get this definition
so basically full circle I guess, we went from hypotenuse could be anything to hypotenuse could be anything
The answer was kinda obvious indeed
But it doesn't hurt to double check with someone who knows better
Thanks
Oh thx it was right i also found a simpler way of doing it
I need to find the permiter of the blue, the sidelengths are 1 any hints to go on about answering the question
You could try thinking about what happens when you put all the individual blue pieces together
4 what?
Significant figures
oh
Mabye it isn't 12
Oh the sides
Ye
Wait but how is that possible
wdym
You can figure it out
I'll try
K thx
,calc 47*((pi-2)^3)
Result:
69.924819491536
Easier way to understand dividing line segments?
Uh.. wut?
Nvm
It was a question of my own
just post your question
Alright
:>
you know the half angle identity for sin?
I don't understand
like half angle identities
I know theta
and cos and sin
and tan
but
I don't really understand the half stuff
does this look familiar?
kind of
It looks familiar but like
with different variables and a little bit different
it is
oh ok
so ur gonna wanna plug cos(theta) = -7/25 into +- sqrt( (1-cos(theta))/2 )
basically replace cos(theta) with -7/25
ohh ok
so
I would do like for exmplae
+-sqrt( -7/25))/2 )?
sorry If I'm wrong
I'm use to like the
+-sqrt(b^2 - 4ac/2)
close
1 sec
should be this my mouse glitching lol
but thats not the answer yet btw
thats just the possible values of sin(theta/2)
does it make sense so far tho?
yuh?
let me write this down to follow along easier
ok
yes, but thats not the final answer
ohh ok
the two possible values are -4/5 and 4/5
but
theta has to be between pi and 3pi/2 right?
yes
I'm confused on that part
π
Like I can finally read it
Since Cos(theta) = -7/25 and its greater than pi and less than 3pi/2
Let me check
if i can do it
alr
wait so
If Cos is
-7/25
and cos is the cah part of soh cah toa
does that mean Adjacent and Hypothenus are
-7 and 25
the ratio between them is -7/25 yes
ohh ok
the sides could be -7 and 25, or -14 and 50, ect.
yea
ok so
and since sin is
opposite over hypothenus
would that mean the denominator by default
has to be like
25
or am i confusing myself
ima delete since technically not accurate lol
alright
yeah
but basically
you know that since theta varies from pi to 3pi/2
yea
when theta is pi, sin(theta/2) is sin(pi/2) = 1
when theta is 3pi/2, sin(theta/2) is sin(3pi/4) = sqrt(2)/2
see i wanna graph it in polar π π
is the final answer +4/5?
yeah he said is it the positive one
and it is
Oh
ohh
im thinking how
like basically
when you go from 1 to sqrt(2)/2 with the sine function
yeah
sqrt(2)/2 is about 0.7 something
ik but since its theta/2 so it is defined from pi/2 to 3pi/4 where sin is positive
what?
anyway
sin(pi/2) is bounded between 0.7 and 1
4/5 =0.8 is bounded there
rather than its negative
i was telling this to kazruki i think
i mean idk what u said
ah nothing much really
oh
wait so
theta/2 is defined from pi/2 to 3pi/4 yeah
the theta / 2 means its positive
yes
thats what i meant
ohh ok
its sin so yes
its positive from 0 to pi
tan is positive from pi to 3pi/2
cos is positive from 3pi/2 to 2pi
ah ok
I see
wait so
taking that information
If I'm doing this one
would I just do
Ok
@idle island
@trail tendon
I don't know if I did this correct
but I got the exact same answer
this time it was
negative -4/5
you have to use a slightly different formula
oh
Undefined for real numbers
what do you mean by that
Have you learned imaginary numbers yet
I don't think we have
maybe
where did i forget it at
actually idk what u did
Let me send my work
Well then it's undefined π€· if u got the correct sqrt
So I did
1 + cos(theta) = 1 - 7/25 = 18/25
divide by 2 and you get 9/25
take sqrt and you get 3/5
wait
so it should be +- 3/5
π
What
How do you get -32/25 from 1+7/5 or 1-7/5
because since it's
a fraction 7/25
woulnd't
wouldn't a full number 1
be equal to the 25
so I added +25
or
Not if it was negative
Not -32/25
Thats what I said...
1 - 7/25 = 25/25 - 7/25 = (25-7)/25 = 18/25
wait
holdon let me re-check my work
ok I see what I did wrong
I was supposed to do
+25
instead of
-25
Yes because 1 does not equal -25/25
β oh cool I can do the sign from mobile
1β -25/25 1β -(25/25)
No
-1β -25/-25
oh ok
You cant just make up a new negative sign
Nope
oh
One of them needs to be neagtive
Or the fraction needs to be multiplied by -1
Basically negative signs anywhere in the fraction apply to the whole fraction
so would it be the denominator?
Can be either
oh ok
Normally written in the numerator
And if it's your final answer you probably would want to simplify to no negatives in denominator
is how did 1 + cos(theta) = 1 - 7/25 = 18/25
wait
ok
I see
I feel dumb now ngl
I finally realized
It's a +1
Is cos(theta)=-7/25?
yea
Then
I got my final answer is 3/5 @trail tendon
1+cos(theta)
1+(-7/25)
(25/25)+(-7/25)
18/25
yea
.
oh
Correct
I dont think so. Are you solving for theta?
Uhhh'
This is what I was solving for on it
Is there context to that or is it a standalone question
Negative should be fine here
Depending on the problem
I haven't done geometry in a while
If you need help with algebra I can help tho
Look up the formula for sin(a + b)
Simplifies to (2 tan t) / (1 - tan^2 t)
Its just Sin(A+B)
in what way
literally tells you to draw it
then apply the sine rule
also for part c
ya i got the answer
what is the answer?
h=6.3 i think
and the third side was like 5.5 or something
In this picture can someone explain how did he get an angle by adding 30 and 45 together. I'm trying to figture it out but i can't
What I did know is somehow 3 angle have to be added to get 180 degree
Can someone help me in this question
Idk I am not able to prove
Show that the perpendicular drawn from (4,1) on the line segment joining (6,-5) and
(2,-1) divides it internally in the ratio 8: 5.
that's not true. Just draw that.
that would take a reallly long time
nope. it took me 6 lines with one equality sign in each π
how do u continue from there
what have you got?
you did it wrong
how
2sin40 cos(40) = sin(80)
my bad
not cos(80)
sin 40sin 80
If A(4,1), B(6,5), C(2,-1) then you can use the dot product for vectors CA, and CB. As |CA| * cos(ACB) is a projection of CA on CB it equals (CA * CB)/|CB|. So, you just need to prove (CA * CB)/|CB|^2=5/13. Which is kind of obvious: CA=(2,2), CB=(4,6), so (2 * 4+2 * 6)/(16+36)=5/13.
use the same thing for sin10*sin80
use some formula for sin(a)*sin(b)
there isnt any such formula
there is
Gotcha
Thanks
Can someone please help me with this?
Is that supposed to be a regular trapezoid
nothing is mentioned
Ok it is a regular trap
Probably should've mentioned that lmao
Anyway you can solve for the other side of that triangle, x, since 2x+4.5=9.5
That was what I was looking for, THANKS
also can I just assume every trap to be reguar in case nothing is mentioned?
I guess so... I solved for the angle quickly and it's 16.3 smth rounding to 16.4
They should mention that it's regular though
nice, that's what I got too
thanks alot for the help
Essentially if it's multiple choice and they do smth like that I'd assume it's regular and solve for the angle, if your answer is nowhere close to 1 of the choices try smth else
But in this case it is just 16.4
hmmm okay, got it
Come to think of it maybe you don't have to assume it's regular
But I have badminton rn so I can't work it out, but if you divide the lengths as x and y where x+y+4.5=9.5 maybe you can solve for area of trapezoid, which is sum of rectangle + 2 triangles, and maybe that would show x=y
I thought of that too but since they told us that these multiple choice quesstions should take 2 mins each, I don't think they need that much work
hello, I need help understanding the behavior of hyperbolas, specifically their asymptotes
how could I find the max and minimal value of this function without using derivatives?
take tan x = +infinity or x = pi/2 for instance and the max value is clearly +infinity
on the other hand, for the minimum, sub u = tan x
min value of u^2 + u = (u + 1/2)^2 - 1/4 is -1/4
and this value is attained at x = arctan(-1/2) so this is not a false minimum
so the min value would just be y = -1/4?
yes
alright, thank you very much ^^
Yeah and I thought about it and that doesn't work either
If we're using the reciprocal properties to graph cosecant and secant functions, then how come we're using 2sin(2x) to graph 2csc(2x) and not 1/[2sin(2x)]?
Hi folks! I'm trying to place n angles X = x_1, ..., x_n on the unit circle, such that they all live at multiples of some fixed angle k, and such that no matter how much I rotate them, no two rotated angles ever coincide with any two non-rotated angles. That is, if we call theta + X the set of rotated points in X, the intersection of X and theta + X has size at most 1, for all theta except multiples of 2pi (of course).
Among all possible solutions, I'd like to maximize the minimum distance between two points. That is, to have as much minimum spacing as possible.
For n = 2, k = 5, the solution is [0, 175Β°] or [0, 185Β°], assuming wlog one of the points lives at zero. For n = 3 we get all of these: [[0,115,235],[0,115,240],[0,120,235],[0,120,245],[0,125,240],[0,125,245]].
What does the solution look like in general?
Does any one here know why the point on a quarter ellipse where y = b/2 is the formula for the height of an equilateral triangle? (a * sqrt(3))/2 ? lmfao
not sure exactly what you mean
but isn't it just because $(1/2)^2 + (\sqrt 3/2)^2 = 1$
south, just south
yeah you mean a quarter-circle right
Quarter circle or quarter ellipse. https://www.desmos.com/calculator/wnc8kvgokt
wow, nice graph
Its wild because Im smart dumb xD. I had to find this point for work and instead of deriving it properly, I just bruit forced it by taking the minimum difference between array slices of the delta of the ellipse. xD
Almost a year later I derived it properly.
What job would require this? Financial astrology of course hahah (f)
Thank you!
You can verify that the change in y on either side is b/2 by integrating the quarter ellipse from 0 to n and from n to a
Im sure there is a real name for a point like that, but Im just self educated for better or for worse :/
Does (n-2)180 work for any shape to find what the angles add up to?
Hi, may i ask you where you get the question from?
How would you find the area of the tilted square?
the slope is 1/(4-1) and the height is 4+1.
so the area of the tilted square is 5^2+15^2.
So 250?
yes
thank you
why isnt this correct? Im supposed to find all of the values of m for which the function has solutions
How do I draw this? I can't think how to draw this at all
AOD is the diameter of a circle, centre O. The cyclic quadrilateral ABCD is such that COB is 42ΒΊ and OD is parallel to BC.
Anyone need help?
Draw A and D on opposite ends first
B and C lie on the circumference, definition of cyclic
OD parallel to BC means that BC horizontal if you drew AD horizontal
Finally angle BOC is 42
A B C D should be in clockwise order
In other questions they also can be in anticlockwise order
You just can't go out of order
Should be -1 not 1
In the 1st line
In this situation where youre dividing line segments how do you draw the triangle
what triangle?
oh do you mean two right-angled triangles?
I think youre supposed to draw a triangle and put the points that follow to the ratio
If the ratio is 1:3
yeah I suspect it's this then
This is what i saw
How do you draw it up
Up or down
Frick my spelling
How do you know its drawn that way? Is there a way to know?
both up and down work
Oh ok
If ab is 5 times as long as bc is it 5:1 or 1:5 im dumb
then AB:BC = 5:1
Guys, what does geometry typically go over (other than shapes)
Hey guys could you check my work, is there anything else I can do to simplify this fraction?
not really unless you want to rationalize the denominator
From what I remember it was mostly dealing with triangles and circles, I think, how to find one or more sides of the triangle using the Pythagorean theorem or sine, cosine, and tangent, finding the angle using sine, cosine, and tangent. Learning about corresponding angles, alternate interior and exterior angles, and lots of other stuff. You can find videos on YouTube that are hours long, if youβre interested, that go over all basic geometry stuff and more.(Ima be honest Iβm not sure if you guys will use sine cosine and tangent)
Alrighty, I donβt want to rationalize it, thank you!!
Thanks
geometry is about shapes so i dont know what u mean. but at its core its just triangles and circles
Guys pls help π₯²
anybody good w geometric proofs??
Angle 1 is 35 degrees, Angle 2 is 65 degrees, Angle 3 is 29 degrees, Angle 4 is 115 degrees, Angle 5 is 65 degrees, Angle 6 is 29 degrees, and Angle 7 is 144 degrees.
Keep in mind the figure to the right is a quadrilateral, not a triangle. Also, angle 7 is a separate angle from the 90 degree one
Oh got confused on 7 lol
depends on the problem, but in general im decent
do you just want the straight up entire proof
Hmm some of what you said were my original answers but the teachers been confusing me with the area around 7
Oh what did they say?
yeah that would be great lol
Dude she just sucks at teaching tbh π₯² and when she does she barely explains thats why i got confused with this
Cause to me 2=5 and 115=4
i have like 4 more though; everyone tells me to go through the theorems i could apply i just dont know how to do them in general
maybe i just dont understand the jist of it lol
Statement: <1 is congruent to <2, Reasoning: Base Angles Theorem
Statement: <1 is congruent to <3, Reasoning: Corresponding Angles
Statement: <2 is congruent to <3, Reasoning: Transitive Property of Congruence
Statement <3 is congruent to <4, Reasoning: I think you can just put "Previous steps" because logically it makes sense
Statement: Triangle NEB is isoceles, Reasoning: Converse Base Angles Theorem
should be right
thank you
no problem
Im not sure about yall but i keep getting 11.6 when trying to solve for x
I need like 4 more problems to finish this jsjsbd
help plz π
x might be 15
Is this multiple choice? Orr?
you have to match the choices with the question
20 should probably be A because its the answer choice thay relates to the line
ya i think so too
Im confused with the rest tho
well... do you need help or som
This ig +3 other problems
Yeah
k i just learned that
a) AM, b) KP, c) CM, d) C, e) CM, f) L
Thxx
She straight up never told us this π
e) A
Oh ok xd
ya i have no idea lol im failing that
I have a 2 hour exam friday π kill meee
Yeah!!!!
is this SSS SSA and stuff?
Uh i dont think so?
your teacher didnt teach you that?
Guys does anybody know what p=x/2 mean
I'm learning bout circles
Radius
That stuff
we're gonna need more context...
AB : BC = 2:3 and AC = AB + BC = AB =2/5AC
How the heck does this work
what?
i think you miswrote something
also more context would be nice...
π
Can someone explain why those two angles are the same
angles on a straight line add up to 180 degrees
so in the quadrilateral the angle sum is 90 + 90 + (180 - theta) + theta = 360
as expected
can someone explain like the alternate interior angles alternate exterior angles remote angles etc?
im so connfused
Pls help thank you
BDC=PCB and AEDB is cyclic
why?
no just read about cyclic quadrilaterals.
and angles between a tangent and a chord
plis help 
draw in OC, itβs a radii of the circle, then use pythagorean theorem
tysm
srry i need more help
i hate this 
π
The HL Theorem is only with a leg and Hypotenuse right?
I'm new here can I ask for any help here? im in secondary school rn
Yes!
Probably very simple but I'm dumb so need help solving this
it doesn't mean prove right?
I think it might have been show π
how about 'solve' π
usually you 'prove' or 'show' an identity, but this isn't an identity
its only true for some theta values
Something like that those terms are used interchangeably in my book
'prove' or 'show' are interchangeable, but i think this one would be more of a 'solve' since you'd want specific theta values
you're looking for theta right?
No not looking for theta It says if cosA+sinA=β2 sinA the prove that secA=2β2 SinA
I cant solve it I'm kinda feeling like it's unsolvable
oh
yea
cos(theta) + sin(theta) = sqrt(2)sin(theta)
cos(theta) = [sqrt(2) - 1] sin(theta)
sec(theta) = 1/[sqrt(2) - 1] csc(theta)
hmm
the result I'm getting is sec(theta)=β2+1/sin(theta)
you mean sqrt(2) + (1/sin(theta)) = sqrt(2) + csc(theta)?
idk how u got that result anyway
Let me do it in pen and paper and I'll give a pic
ok
This is what I got correct me if I made any mistake pls
yea looks fine
I wrote sin(theta) twice ignore it lol π
Viper check alg oncee
i don't think what you are trying to 'prove' makes too much sense though
?
I'm wondering is it possible to get 2β2sin(theta) from β2+1/sin(theta)