#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages ยท Page 79 of 1
I read the math stack exchange page they didnt list this as an axiom? (Their proof was also the same as yours)
I definitely dont lmao but curiosity
Lemme find it
by need i meant like, to convince yourself that this is logically consistent
curiosity is always good
first answer?
No shit intuitively its obviously true and since ive been using it for like 9 years already itll be hard to believe its false but i still kinda wanted a proof
I smell measure theory
i mean here what im assuming is like, we are taking the properties of real numbers for granted
cause that's what it boils down to
They ended up having to assume integer too
going further than this as catgod said would probably have us talking about measure theory
yea i dont think it has anything to do with integers honestly
like
if we accept that we can get from one real number to another by some scaling factor
then i dont see why the distinction of integer/non integer is relevant
๐ uh i definitely cant do that rn maybe ill revisit this when i can
LMAO yeah i mean its cool stuff
i just meant like
its hard to reduce it past what i said without it idk
I mean that kinda assumes scaling factor doesnt break shit
Which we dont exactly know rn
But ye
I get what you mean
Thanks
np
Is anyone around to help with some math understanding?
just ask!
My friend is trying to understand inverse trig functions
the problem he is working through is sin(arccos(1-x)
He needs to know how to do inverse trig functions when there is a function involved (such as 1-x). He needs to understand how to solve them when its not just something like sin(arccos(1))
Can anyone explain how to do problems like that?
Is it correct that the Pythagorean identity needs to be used?
yeah
the fn and its inverse must match
fn?
function
the inner function must be the inverse of the outer function
in order for you to get the original value yea
but you can simplify without them matching
with trig functions
i see
Skibidi
skibidi pop
skibidi is just scoobydoo in disguise. there's nothing new under the sun
toilet
is a right triangle with a hypotenuse of 3, and adjacent leg of 1, and an opposite leg of 2.8284271247461903 possible?
,w 2sqrt(2)
if you're not being highly concerned about sigfigs then it is possible
,w arcsin(1/3) in deg
Hi i need help with number 1
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
My test is next period
the shape is not convex: you can draw a line that passes through two points in the polygon which also passes outside
Its asking for a reason why its not a polygon , not whether it is concave
a polygon has to be convex by definition
I mean a simple polygon
Can someone explain why this is false? Wouldn't the left side of the equation basically be (-1) * (2) * (sin(x)) * (-1) * (3) * (cos(x)) and then I can move those values around however I need to simplify?
its false because you are introducing multiplication when that isn't present
-a - b isn't the product of -a and -b
@hard smelt ^
-1 - 2 isn't 2
hi
Are you saying that cos(x)sin(x) is different than cos(x) * sin(x)
no
i'm saying that
$$-2\sin(4\deg) - 3\cos(4\deg)$$
is different to
$$-2\sin(4\deg) \red{\times} - 3\cos(4\deg)$$
โฮฑฮผOmeganato5
oh duh. idk how that didnt register in my brain
How to remember trig formulas
by solving as many questions as you can
Can anyone get me what do we get if we use sterwarts theorem to find angle bisector length?
I cant simply it
Please Help
Be born smart.
That's the best advice anyone can give.
nah
look at the pinned chart
and u make sense of it
there's a reason for their grouping
u could start with the Pythagorean identity
as an example
So I should crawl back in the womb
Ok thanks
It's better not remember them and get better at deriving them instantly
In your head
A more valuable skill
do u know how the other Pythagorean identities were derived?
What are the other ones
No you are already contaminated by this world.
,,1+\tan^2\theta=\sec^2\theta\
1+\cot^2\theta=\csc^2\theta
Ok
0_ื
No idk those
but do you know
$$\sin^2\theta+\cos^2\theta=1$$
?
0_ื
you just divide it by $\sin^2\theta$ or $\cos^2\theta$
0_ื
if u divide it by sinยฒ u get the first one. if the other one, the 2nd
yea, as zaid said, it's better if u know how to derive instead
it also shows how much u understand about them
which is good if u do
Ok
@flint ingot an advice, u should know the sum of product identity
bc most other identities derive from it
I just want to know them in case one question need them
Whatโs this
,,\sin(\alpha\pm\beta)=\sin\alpha\cos\beta\pm\cos\alpha\sin\beta
0_ื
and
yeyea
Check if what you say makes sense.
It does
By giving values to stuff
,,\cos(\alpha\pm\beta)=\cos\alpha\cos\beta\mp\sin\alpha\sin\beta
0_ื
Ok
what's with those emojis
is a genius emoji
Bro is high on trig
@flint ingot do u know the double angle formula?

What
Like the circle theoermen
sin2x=2sinxcosx?
it's derived from sincos+cossin
Ok
Yeah
yea

if u practice deriving them, soon u will memorize them
sus
meanwhile theโi forgot what's it called but
@golden crag
,,\sin^2x=\frac{1-\cos2x}2
Wrong
0_ื
that's just cos double angle rearranged right
Yep
yup. nice
Quick bruder
i think it's a better definition. bc i always use Pythagorean and double angle for it
when i derive it
Trig is so boring tbh
idk what im saying at this point
cos2x has these identities
lmfao
i thought the tan one is the sum of products for tan
idk the tan one
i don't have to know them all
good
last one yea
Pretty easy to derive
yup
In yer head
these were messy to remembr
,,e^{ix}=\cos x +i\sin x
0_ื
@upper karma is this also boring?
trig identities are killing me. I'm trying to memorize them
Not really but it's not pure trig
not familiar but looks derivable
sucks i know
fair
learn to derive instead. start with Pythagorean and sum of of prods
Do the same question again and again you'll get used to it.
This was the only thing I liked in trig
,,a^2=b^2+c^2-2bc\cos\alpha
0_ื
very deriveable
where is 1
1?
let x = 1
ig
$r = \frac{{1}{โ}}$ oh fuck
,,\sin x=x-\frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^5}{5!}-\dotsb
taylor swif
0_ื
series
ฺฏู ฺฉุงฺฉ
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
isn't mclaurin taylor with x=0
Ye
idk much abt series
macdeez
In uni?
no
Oh I thought you were in uni.
first time i heard it the word mclaurin is from trisectrices of mclaurin
I was
They really cool
Cool names too
,w trisectrix
,w trisectrices of mclaurin
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
Quadratix is pure genius
,w maclaurin trisectrix
,w quadratirx
ee
You an old single father?
oof i forgot im gonna watch something
i wish
but not single
2 is better than one
2 > 1
i think im being misunderstood at this point but i gotta go
See ya
JM=KL, as a parallelogram always has a pair of two equal and parallel sides.
JK=ML "__"
and MK is a common side
so they are both congruent by the SSS condition
Each point Z is a complex number and a vertex of the hexagon on a complex plane, which each intersects a point on the circle of radius r > 0
What is the distance of z_6 to the origin?
Yeah it is r
But
Why is it that
$r = \frac{z^2_{6}}{z_5}$
Pi, a future fluent jp speaker
if it's along a complex plane, wouldn't the axis be real against imaginary numbers
also, the angles for each vertex would be z1=re^0i, z2=re^i.(๐/3) etcetera. So the angle for vertex z6 would be z6=re^i.(5๐/3). Using euler's formula, e^i.(5๐/3) = 1, so z6=r . 1 which is equal to the radius of the circle (i think)
Given 3 points, there is a plane containing them.
,w euler's formula
are u sure $e^{\frac{5\pi}3i}=1$?
0_ื
squaring z_6 makes the angle the same as z_5
at the same time r is squared. so when u divide them, r remains while the angle cancels to 1
in complex numbers, raising it to a number multiplies the angle of the complex number to that number
An unexpected error occurred while processing your command!
The error has been reported and should be fixed soon.
If the error persists, please contact our friendly support team at our support guild!
discord.errors.DiscordServerError: 503 Service Unavailable (error code: 0): upstream connect error or disconnect/reset before headers. reset reason: connection termination
assuming you know $$a+bi=r(\cos\theta+i\sin\theta)=re^{i\theta}$$
0_ื
Is it possible to solve 5b without implicit and parametric differentiation? Because the book is saying I'll learn them later.
:_( how to solve. I tried solving but go it wrong
<@&286206848099549185>
I have tried it but you gotta do the calculations without the parametric form.
It is given that The normal is parallel to PQ: 3x - 2y + 12 = 0,
Thus it's slope will be the same as that of PQ which is 3/2.
Then the slope of tangent at that point A will be -2/3
(as it is perpendicular to the normal so the product of slopes must be -1).
From there you can write the equation of tangent at the point A as 2x + 3y + ฮป = 0
(where lamda is constant).
Then you gotta substitute either x or y from this equation in hyperbola xy = 48, to obtain a quadratic equation. And since it's the tangent, you put the discriminant of the equation to 0, to obtain 2 values of ฮป, with which you'll get 2 tangents, one in 1st quadrant and other in 3rd.
Then you gotta find the point of intersection of the two curves.
Dang that's long ass work.
I got the point in 3rd quadrant though, it is (-6โ2, -4โ2).
๐ฅบthank you so much for explaining. It makes sense ๐ญ
The other one will be in the 1st quadrant (6โ2, 4โ2).
YES
Thx Ayush
Welcome
Real I must have been in drugs when I tried solving it
๐I got 4, 18
Dang they don't even satisfy the equation homie
Ayoo no problem it happens too often
Yeah : (
Is the question easier with implicit differentiation?
Can you tell me what were u trying to do? Like using differentiation in what way?
Oh I see you were trying to equate the slopes and obtain the value of t?
I differentiated normally then found the gradient of the normal subbed points and tried solving it simultaneously ๐
( I'm on drugs)
Wait lemme try using differentiation and parametric form. I guess it's easier than this long ass calculation
๐
Bruh it's so short and easy with parametric form
Anyone got some good questions?
differentiate $y = 48/x$ to get $dy/dx = -48/x^2$
so $-48/x^2 = -2/3$ or $x^2 = 72$ which means $(x, y) = (6 \sqrt{2}, 4 \sqrt{2}), (-6 \sqrt{2}, -4 \sqrt{2})$
south's secret twin brother
it's actually not bad at all
Where can I see a demonstration for this identity?
they're just special cases of sum of product identities
,,\sin(\alpha+\beta)=\sin\alpha\cos\beta+\cos\alpha\sin\beta
0_ื
^ first one is like that but operates on the same value
\begin{align*}
\sin(\theta+\theta)&=\sin\theta\cos\theta+\cos\theta\sin\theta\\
\sin(2\theta)&=2\sin\theta\cos\theta
\end{align*}
0_ื
I leave to you the derivation of cos2x as an exercise
I still dont understand
From where comes that cos
or the cos here
In both
ok start with this
$$\cos(\alpha+\beta)=\cos\alpha\cos\beta-\sin\alpha\sin\beta$$
0_ื
||\begin{align*}
\sin(\theta+\theta)&=\sin\theta\cos\theta+\cos\theta\sin\theta\
\sin(2\theta)&=2\sin\theta\cos\theta
\end{align*}||
MRrineew
Guys for these formulas, i just plug them in when it says "cos" "sin" or "tan" right?
do you mean plug the sin and cos to tan since tan is sin/cos ?
yea, you can
are AX and BY line segments?
Thank you
In number 8, i think it can be verified by counting the triangles formed, but in number 11 it cannot be counted since the diagonals must come from one vertex therefore it cannot be counted. Am i correct?
Drop a perpendicular to BC from E and use Pythagoreans theorem and base area ratio theorem
What exactly do you mean by counting the no. Of triangles ?
For eleven sum of angles of n triangles would be 180n but we do not want to count the angle around the centre so we will subtract 360 hence its 180(n-2)
This is the proof for 12
11"
Could sm1 help me with my geometry quiz
He just said "Which can be rewritten as..."
The term "Origin power of 2" doesn't make any sense
i did it it was 10
i know this is a bit basic but i cant exactly figure it out: suppose CB is a chord of circle A, and that chord EF is perpendicular to BC at D. how do you show precisely that ED is maximized when EF is a diameter?
Why do we have to subtract 360
We are counting the centre angle
Of all The triangles
Which we dont need
Bros how do I prove this formula works?
subtract 3 right triangles from the big rectangle
Hi how can you prove sin(x-y) and cos(x-y)?
just use complex numbers
Sing "Brave sir Robin ran away..."
It will come to you automatically
i have this
How did we know that angle POQ is n delta ?
the exterior angles are delta, 2 delta - delta, 3 delta - 2 delta.... = always delta
since the tangent is perpendicular to the radius
the angles of the triangles at O will also be delta
technically it's like (omega t + delta) - omega and so on, but omega t always cancels
can you mark the exterior angls
angles
now make a right triangle with the black side (hypotenuse) and the points
there would be 90 - (90 - delta) = delta
cause tangent and radius are perpendicular
oh but how would the black side be the tangent ?
yes it's tangent to the circle
this side would be inside the circle circumscribing it
so its elongation would also pass through the circle twice
ah no, there, the tangent line would be the line S
I should just say the line that is the continuation of the previous side
can you also explain how we got angle OPS And OPQ
OPQ would be (180- ndelta )/2
OPS ?
wait I think I explained it wrong
so the interior angle would be 180 - delta for all of them
by isosceles triangles, the base angles would be (180 - delta)/2
so 180 - (180 - delta)/2 * 2 = delta
there we go
i thought that is what you said lol
angle OPS?
ahhh so by this logic, OPS would be (180 - delta)/2
and OPQ would be (180 - n delta)/2
cause the interior angles are all equal
np!
how should i go on about proving that
${cos(\frac{x}{2})=\sqrt{\frac{1+cos(x)}{2}}}$
kazooha
try rearranging for cos u in cos 2u = 2 cos^2 u - 1
after that sub in u = x/2
also there should be a plus minus sign on the RHS
okay thanks for the help
(sqrt is positive by definition, that's why)
yeah so i guess it depends on the interval in which x varies
exactly basically whenever cos(x/2) is positive or 0
O is the centre of the circle. If AC = 28 cm, BC = 21 cm, angle BOD = 90 and angle BOC = 30, then find the area of the shaded region
since AB is the diameter
what circle theorem can you use to find angle ACB?
oh! yeh forgot the theorems completely now I got will take it from here!, ACB = 90 (2 chords from the diameter to the circumference make 90) thank you :D
np!
The frustum of the regular quadrilateral pyramid ABCDA'B'C'D' has AB = 7sqrt2 cm, A'B' = 4โ2 cm, AA'=3sqrt10 cm. We denote 0 and O' the centers of the bases. Compute OM, where M is on OO', so that triangle C 'MC is isosceles from the point M
Can someone walk me through the geometry here?
is this the right formula to get the area of a square using its diagonal sides?
(d^2)/2
i kind of forgor ๐๐
yes
alright thanks
Just rember like this
Area of rhombus is d1d2/2
So can we say every square is a rhombus because it has same properties as rhombus it is just a special
Yes we can say that
So area of square is also d1d2/2
Here d1 or d2 are equal
So area goes like
d1ยฒ/2
Or d2ยฒ/2
Can someone still prove it?
s
Could someone help me understand this problem? The solution is C but I can't figure it out with transformations and why the graph would end up like that.
I knew it @rancid veldt
any guesses?
Ill come up with worked sol
ty
Finding the y intercept most of the time is a dead give away
tysm that helped a lot
Glad I could help
Are you by any chance an aussie? maybe year 11?
Help numbers 12,13,14 i have no progress
someone answer with clear explanation
<@&286206848099549185>
do you know what an altitude is?
Yes
define
Altitude is the perpendicular drawn from a vertex to the opposite side of any triangle
Good
now grab a pen and a paper
Ok
draw a rough triangle
K
draw altitudes from two of the vertex
hint: area = 1/2 * base * height
if the two heights are equal, what must also be equal
.
in such a way that the altitudes are equal in distance
Wow
Thanks โค๏ธ bruh
Thanks Tyler u too
Welcome
whats the answer?
Isosceles
Good
What stopping it to be an equilateral triangle ๐ค
think
you've shown that 2 of the sides must be equal
but then the 3rd side could be anything
yah
dude let him think, dont spoon feed him
Yeah but if isosceles wasn't mentioned in options i would click on equilateral
yup
that would be the correct answer
if isoceles is not in the options
One angle
If I'm given that cos x = 4/5 and sin y = 5/13, can I use the identity $1 + \tan{x}^2 = \sec{x}^2$ to find sin x?
The question is to actually find tan(x + y), but I wonder about this
Pi, a future fluent jp speaker
you don't need to find sin x
just find tan x and tan y
and actually you can draw a triangle with adj = 4 and hyp = 5 to find tan x
and similarly for tan y
any1 know the answer?
Just say me if it works or not
๐ญ
But does it works
actually yeah I see, you're finding sin(x + y) and cos(x + y) first
it works
so you just need to find cos y and sin x
you already have sin y and cos x from the question
For me it is easier to first find sin x and cos y to find tan(x) and tan(y)
okok
Can anyone explain me this and how can i get the answer
what circle theorem does number 1 look like?
you can search up pictures of circle theorems online
Ohh tyy
Really needed something like this thanks Brody @obsidian harness
This i mean
no problemo!
7/24
greenballticker
or simply 22.5
no 3 is obviously 45
i mean 90
because it intercept semi circle arc
no 2 is 27
same arc inscribed angle have equal measures
ez
what did I do wrong here?
cos^2(4x) is a trigonometric function with a power greater than 1
so what would be the answer
i think the last term should be positive and you need to get rid of the square but otherwise it looks correct
3/4 - cos(2x) + 1/4 cos(4x) I believe
๐
๐
cnidarian emoji
bro people claiming emojis now? :l
I know yours
๐
โ ๏ธ
Fair
yeah i got a few questions about etale cohomology
!da2a
No need to ask โCan I askโฆ?โ or โDoes anyone know aboutโฆ?โโitโs faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
very lost
whats that
like if you have a question just ask the question
ohh
I'm lost on this problem
How do I solve for i t
theres more of them but I just don't understand how to solve for it
Is 5ฯ/3 in sin's principal branch?
arcsin(sin(x)) = x
sin(arcsin(x)) = x
by definition of inverse functions
hmm ok
well
nah not here there's a domain restriction
the domain of arcsin is [-1,1] so youll have to shift the 5pi/3 back by a period to get the answer
no need
what's the period of sine
which is
2 pi
oh yeah mb ๐
you need to find the shift that lands you in the domain of arcsin which is [-1,1]
hmm ok
so with that in mind what do you think
put what into ur calculator
nah just like
we know 5pi/3 > 1, how many factors of 2pi do we need to shift it back by
to fall within [-1,1]
no thats going in the wrong direction
minus 2pi
what
like to simplify it?
yea
5pi/3 - 2pi = 5pi/3 - 6pi/3 = -pi/3
but like
thats the simplest form
yeah i initially thought so too when i saw the question then i realized
lmfao
is it like
whats up
How can I visually tell if theres a domain restriction
well
yk what the graph of sin looks like right
yeah so
the reason there's a domain restriction on the inverse sine is because if we try to send the outputs of that wave back to the inputs we don't have a well defined function because each sine value has infinitely many inputs that map to it
no not always for example like the inverse of sin and cos will look like this due to the periodic behavior but the inverse of a straight line or something will just be the line reflected across y=x so we can say the inverses cancel each other out and youre just left with the original value for something like that
for all inputs
another example of a domain restriction ur probably familiar with is the square root, so when we say f(x) = x^2 this sends x and -x to x^2 but if we try to make an inverse for it we need to choose a unique value to send x^2 to, so that's why we make it the positive square root
therefore if f(x) = x^2, then f^-1(f(x)) = |x| rather than just x
ah ok
so like if we had f^-1(f(-2)) or something this would be 2
yeah
so its the same type of idea for this as well
idk if that answers your question but
a little bit
thats the conceptual idea at least
so basically
one of my biggest problems
in math is just
decyphering
what the question is asking
yeah tbh my biggest tip for that is just practicing
which like
is maybe not the most helpful advice cause it sounds obvious but there isn't really a shortcut
most people would tell you the same
ah ok
just to be sure
this is asking for
this value right
like the value
inside of both sin's
the X
well depending on the question it'll either be equal to that inside value or shifted by some period like we did for the problem you showed me
ah ok
like if we had started with sin^-1(sin(-pi/3)) then the answer would just be the inside value yeah but in our case it was different
yea
well try and figure out what it would be from what we did, like you need to see what the domain restriction you need to apply to tan is for arctan to be a perfect inverse of it and then adjust the inside value if need be because tan is periodic
look at the graphs for each, try to trace through what we talked about above and see if you can figure that out
alright yeah
ima try that
I ended up getting
the same answer
for some reason I feel like its wrong
No ur right lmao
This one is also -pi/3
Nice
your right
Like the period of cos is 2pi
oh
So cos(a+ 2pi*k) = cos(a) for any integer k
It doesnโt matter what a is
Like
It doesnโt have to have pi in it itself
Granted that if we just have some rando integer as the input it would come out to be some weird value that nobody really uses but itโs still defined
oh
this one I got
archcos(cos(4))
should I turn the 4 into
a 4/1
and then
hmm
Like
the part I'm lost on is like
what can I even subtract or add to this one
the shift
I keep getting the answers wrong
Can someone tell me this one is so I can back track what im doing wrong
Actually you can still find it but itโs gonna need a little bit of trickery cause for the domain restriction here we need the input to land in [0,pi], and there isnโt any integer multiple of 2pi such that 4 + 2pi*k is within that (cause 4>pi and the smallest shift backwards we can do is 4-2pi which is negative), but we can to make use of the fact that cos(x-pi) = -cos(x) cause going half of a period back just lands you on the correct absolute value but with the opposite sign
No that wonโt be the exact answer but thatโs like the insight here you can use to get to it
Youd have to do it like
ah okay
pi-(4-pi))
So 2pi-4
Like cos(pi-x) and cos(x-pi) are both -cos(x) so to get back to something you can input into cos(x) you need to do that process of finding the right answer with the opposite sign by shifting with pi twice
And making it fall into the domain of arccos
Idk itโs hard to explain in words but if you look at the graphs itโll make sense I think
im gonna be honest im so lost can someone please help me.
<@&286206848099549185>
tbh I have forgotten these
there used to be congruence and similarity criterions
Similar triangles are the triangles that have corresponding sides in proportion to each other and corresponding angles equal to each other. Understand the different theorems to prove similar triangles using formulas and derivations.
I'd wager you would need to exploit one of these criterions
you aren't supposed to ping them here
How to calculate the length of bc using the cosine formula? H is 20 cm.
you know what the formula is, right?
The adjacent leg/hypotenuse, right?
okay wait sorry what cosine formula do you mean
like... the cos(x) = adjacent/hypotenuse?
if it is that one, give me a moment
wait pardon my stupidity how is h 20?
Wait, I prolly don't even know what the cosine formula is tbh
And that's the problem
I just calculated sine 56,4 degrees and then multiplied the result with 24
you know that H is 20, and AB (the hypotenuse) is 24. what does that make the other leg of the larger right triangle?
the red one im showing here^^
Yeah, that one I also calculated, but I used pythagoras' theorem, is that cheating?
im not really sure exactly what your teacher or textbook want
do you know the c^2 = a^2 + b^2 -2abcos(C) formula?
if so, i think that one is probably what they wanted, but im not sure
Nope
What's the name of it?
damn
Sorry, me very stupid
the law of cosines
Yeah, I'm gonna watch a video on it lol
well
okay if it's not too much to ask do you know what level of math you're at
so i can properly do this bc
i dont want to accidentally give you something too advanced ๐ญ
So the textbook obviously wants me to use the cosine formula
So it seems rather logical that I learn it
do they have the explanation on some other page
Yeah, I kinda skipped that chapter
Anyways, I did learn the sine formula right now, which made sense
The former
okay yeah if you learned that one you should definitely learn the cosine one
aigh
Thanks for the guidance ๐ธ
np!
how could I get the values of any given angles in trig functions such as cos(36ยฐ) or tg(18ยฐ)?
If you just want an approximation, you can probably just use the first couple terms of their macularin series
Tan 18 is ugly
For cos 36 nd sin18
Use sin 90 = 1 = sin(5*18)
will try, thank you
@light dock
just ping the whole mod role next time
but thanks for letting me know.
Me afraid to
we get them all the time :P no need to worry.
you can use herons
it would be much simple
how about law of cosines
similar triangles
just dm me if you want solution
Anyone can help. Show PQ^2-RS^2=4OY^2-4OX^2
use the property the line from centre to midpoint of chord is perpendicular to the chor
chord
what do you think it is
with pythogoreas theorem .
i think i skipped a math class
that wasnt on the adding topic
but i got it
it was 4
anyone know the anwsers?
do you know how to start?
no I dont i just need the anwser though
all angles in a triangle sum to 180
and once u figure out the last angle the sides are gonna be easy cause its a common type of triangle
but in general you can do it with law of sines even if it were a weird triangle
I know b is 45 degrees
but beyond that know clue just trying to get this exam turned in
s=4 right?
is it 2.828?
can you please just tell me
Look up the Pythagorean theorem and apply it
already failed the question
yo
Use mid point theorem
Dont pin
isnt this server for helping
can u mentions me the rules so i can read them
"With rules , we live in a world with animals" - Winston Churchill
Idr the exact phrase lol
Just check #rules man
Anyone got some ideas regarding THIS?
if someone comes here then send me a proof of it
Ok i dont need it now i have figured it out by myself
Im sorry but i cant read like half of this
I solved it though
ABC is an acute angle triangle such that angle A= 60ยฐ
Thats as far as i could understand it
Oh sweet
But umm isnt it too obvious to understand what it means ? (If you do alot of Geometry then yes)
No like i cant read the writing
H is orthocente and I is the incentre
Also C > B
Find AHI/B
Angle HI/B?
Angle AHI / Angle B
how do i find x
use pythagore
it is way easier to use pythagore
And what will u get by doing that? 0 = 0
the length of x lol
Pls show how
any 30-60-90 triangle will have side lengths in that ratio
U won't get anything
the x tells you the ratio of the sides is 1 : sqrt3 : 2
x can take any positive value
you will just wait
this
Huh
then solve idc
= xยฒ??
idk wait
What ru doing?? ๐ญ
whats wrong with it???
4xยฒ-3xยฒ=xยฒ
isnt it supposed to be xยฒ
So maths in Belgium is different?
So wtf were u doing ??
it was an error
so
But still Pythagoras won't help
Let's just act like nothing happened
Everyone make silly mistake
yeah
India
yo its so cool
What is so cool?
India
India would be harder by a mile I feel
idk
though yeah I heard someone from Belgium say they found maths hard too
Hell nah
More or less every other country has a better curriclum
AHAHHAHHAH
Do any of yall need any help?
no thanks
lol
We really need a dont ask to help page too 
yeah fr
Tru
Also coming back to that people in here are just good rant-ers so that
So hardde
but
I'm preparing for engeneering
yo me too
Jee =/= indian avg guy math
With 20 lacks competitors
where r u from
Id rather not
why

