#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 70 of 1
Lol
ik this is probably a stupid question but theres b level problem in my book that says: draw a segment that has the length of 1, use the segment to construct a segment of length √15. i was thinking of extending the segment by adding a segment length 15 then using geometric mean to find a segment of √15, but idk if im just allowed to extend it like that
not what you said i mean the problem XD
i should say the problem
💀
uh
i would use the fact that a 45-45-90 triangle has side lengths 1, 1, sqrt(2)
actually
that doesnt even help
idk 💀
its ok idk what to do without adding more info but ik im not allowed to do that
no it’s not
"use the segment" is kind of vague
maybe i don't understand ?
then help hockeydude85
use the Pythagorean theorem
idk if i have enough info for that
tHeY dOnT haVe AnglEs
huh?
i just have a segment
you need a 90 degree angle to use the pythagorean theorem
and multiple segments
bruh I don’t know what u r saying
it says "use the segment"
and create another segment of length 1
😂
u can’t
you only have 1 br
wtf are u saying
"use the segment"
have u not done a construction before
not use multiple of the same segment
so im allowed to extend it?🧟♀️
u can copy the segment
it should say that but ok
no all u can do is keep the segment where it is and make the segment of length square root of 15 appear
it’s not hard
thats how i read the problem 😂
and thats why i said the problem is dumb
because thats literally what it tells you to do
that’s definitely not what it means
no
thats not what it MEANS but thats what it said 😂
well
its not specific enough
on what it means by
"use"
"use the segment"
It is what it means
the segment and a straightedge and a compass
duh
thats not obvious to me
how is that duh
can i use a ruler?
a straightedge
it’s a construction
u can’t try to measure the lengths of segments with a ruler
i guess you're just used to this type of problem so you automatically know what its talking about
i haven't seriously used a compass in like 5+ years 💀, kind of forgot they existed
💀
guys does my solution work or not 💔
what did u do?
backread
p
I don’t see u saying what u did
this is your solution?
yep
oh oops
just use the Pythagorean theorem that’s simpler
but it still works right?
yeah
bc ik in construction u can pick an radius as long as you stick to it i just didnt know if that logic applied
ok thanks guys !
what does this mean?
ok?
okay
your construction is pretty good because 15 + 1 is a power of two so if u construct like a segment of length 2 (easily) u can just copy that and copy the length 4, etc
what tangent line is it referring to exactly?
thanks
Someone is standing in a lighthouse and sees two boats, they are exactly 480m apart along the west-east line. Boat A is directly north with an angle of depression of 22', Boat B is directly west of Boat A with an angle of depression of 15'. What is the bearing of Boat B?
angle of depression
have you tried drawing it out?
if you make a triangle at sea level, then it will be right angled cause of the west-east line and directly north bits
and the way to do that is to use right-angled trig, for instance if you label the flat distance from the lighthouse to boat A d
then the height of the lighthouse is d tan 22
so you can use that for the other triangle for boat B to get the flat distance there
and then Pythagoras
is this supposed to be spherical geometry?
probably won't change the answer very much?
nah in TheLord26's question you of course assume the Earth is flat
480m isn't enough for any kind of curvature to matter
it's just like some funky textbook trig problem
Hello
How do i deal with this kind of equations: sin(2x)=sin(pi/4 - x) without subtracting sin(pi/4-x) from both sides and applying sum to product formula? I tried writing smth like 2x=pi/4 - x and solving for x, but i messed it up when it came to adding 2pik radians
you'd introduce that 2pi*k in that initial step
@trail tendon all wrong
?
I asked for Radius
How do u say 12
:+
It is closer to 21 but not 21
Hint: diagonals of a rectangle
you didn't ask for anything
i gave you a random number 😂
so ur tryna find the radius?
you said "lets see who can solve this" and you didnt tell us what we solvin for 💀
how much downward
you just said radius != 21, which is obvious but u didnt tell us to solve for it 💀
shouldn’t power of a point work?
pythagoras
Fix your attitude a bit
Could someone explain this question, I do not understand how the andswer is x+2/5x
nevermind i figured out
Made this triangle calculator in excel so I never have to do trig again, thought yall would appreciate it
Trig isn’t that difficult.
You sure?
I’m assuming by trig calculator you mean you plug in some sides and some angles?
Well that's kinda calculus territory
The idea of the calculator is it instantly graphs the triangle
You can play around and see what happens, throw in negatives, use whatever values
Hmm
Does like 5 steps instantly
Any of yall know how I can do this?
If you have access to a calculator this wouldn’t be that difficult.
My final is comin up I have 28 hours left 💀
No need for a specific excel spreadsheet.
You're very negative, don't underestimate the visual aspect
Then study, don’t waste time making calculators.
:shrug:
I'm not the one who made it
Lol
.
I'm an engineering student
You said you did.
That's me lmfao
Omg why do people have the same damn basic pfp
Nice pocket on the job no wifi insta analysis tool
I mean it's a factorial problem
So why am I expected to solve it 😭
What class is this?
Pre calc
Someone earlier told me to use this formula
I tried this but got stuck lol
That's kinda bs for pre-calc, I honestly don't even know. I'll try to figure it out a bit longer, I'm intrigued
try to ask a question lil bro
Alr..
Fr bs
what is lil bro yappin about
@lost wyvern https://youtu.be/-HwwY4czx_E?si=9J7-DYYZF-wexGUr
In this video, we build on my last two videos by exploring connections between the gamma function (the extended factorials), the digamma function (the extended harmonic numbers), and trigonometry. We derive Euler's Sine Product Formula, which we then use to prove the gamma and digamma functions' reflection formulas. Finally, we derive a related ...
Let me take look
Skip to like 7:40
Answer is B I think
I don't have paper on me cause I'm about to sleep
Use the formula sin(90-theta)=-sin(theta)
And similarly with cos too
So for the top write sin(90-89) in place of sin(1) because then you can cancel it out with sin(89) you see?
If you do this then sin45 will be the only one left
Sin45 times 2 is rad 2
And the cos on the bottom all cancels our to 0 so denominator is just 1
So x= rad 2
So the answer is 2 so B

@golden copper i clearly wrote there Radius !=21
What can you concludr from this ?
Yes u need to find Radius
?
Who are you
I am me
no one cares + didn't asked
.
Me means I
Ok
United by maths differentiated by country 
Your Indian?
Yup
Me too
aap nam kya hai?
Aacha
@worn stag I have my attitude fixed
What you want to find in this one
Radius
You only stated the small information
As i said earlier
Alr
Must have been a reason for me to state Radius is not 21
I was confused when you said "!=" And I realised it was not equal to, because I usually use cross in equal sign to denote it
Can you give me the picture again
I think it was just easy
Because you can derive them
Alr
9th
Maybe the radius is 12? Just asking because recantangle in bottom is 12 so another side also have to be 12
I think the bottom doesn't mean radius
Oh ok
I have seen this question somewhere
Is it from mind your decision
?
Is it 21.25 cm
As you can do it from intersecting chord theorem
You can do it by Pythagoras also
But intersecting chord theorem Is an alternative solution
nhi meh approx bola
English please
This server is international
Irrelevant
9 ^ 2 + (x + 16) ^ 2 = (9 + 12) ^ 2 + x ^ 2 x = 3.25 r ^ 2 = (9 + 12) ^ 2 + 3.25 ^ 2 r = 21.25
What are you yapping about
🙏
@undone quest Let me solve this problem later, Im currently studying factoring
Or atleast say something coherent
16(16+2y) = 12(30)
I said stop pinging me
or atleast say something relevant
It's a doubt server
It's nice to see catgod crying
You're annoying so stop it
LOL
Please
lol
<@&268886789983436800>
Do it again
16(16+2y) = 12(30) 16(16+2y) = 360
16 + 2y = 22.5.
y = 3.25 therefore, radius = √(9^2 + (16+3.25)^2) = 21.25
@undone quest
Read
It's a good thing I have them blocked
Don't ping him
Using intersection chords theorem we got 21.25
What's a purge?
Mass delete of messages
Deleting things
I see..
Nope
please get back on topic


Mind your decisions have good problems sometimes
How will rewriting them all as 90-theta cancel anything?
Here
So if we replace sin(90-89) for sin(1) it will be written as -sin(89)
That cancels with the sin(89) in the end
What
Why negative?
Oh shoot
But what's the point of rewriting it all as Sin(90-89) + Sin (90-88) ..etc
Use Sina +sin b formula
The best answer is use calculator 🔥
I tried but it didn't help
Can you show your workings
My formula is right Google is dumb
I wish I had pencil to show you
Rip
How you took 2 as a whole common?
@lost wyvern do you have paper
It's already in the problem
Ye
Ok here
Send one more question
So write this out for sin1
Sin(90-89)
And then that will simplify to -sin(89)
sin(2)=sin(90-88)=-sin(88)
Oh
Sin(88) is the second to last term in the sum
OMG
So they all cancel out with a Sin45 left
Same rule?
Yes
Cos 1 is Cos (44-1) which is -Cos(44)??
That sounds wrong 💀
Ok ignore that for a second
How would you write cos like that
I think cos(90+x)=-cos(x)
Yes
Let me find my trig book
It should be (2cos44 + 2cos43 ......2cos1 ) + 1 in numerator
While I have solved
Why the 2's in front?
2s?
The formula is 2Sin(etc)*cos(etc)
@lost wyvern I'm so stupid
Why is there a 2 in front of all your cos values
I keep on messing stuff up
What did you discover
sin(90+x)=-sin(x) right
Yes
I did my method what I told you
But apparently I did it wrong
So I have to dig out to find the right formula
Let's think of another way
Because of the formula
I did it
Yes use that
Wait why did you do that
Everything cancels out so then you just have 2sin45
Which is sqrt2
Then you can do logbase sqrt2 of 2 which is equal to 2 and that's the answer
How 1/2 came?
What?
But how 1/2 came?
Because when you do the formula everything has a pair
But sin45 doesnt
So when you factor out 2sin45 your doing sin45/ 2sin45
Which is 1/2
But there is already 2 in common
It is in question
2 isn't in common for Sin45
I think it is 1
2 ( 2sin45 * cos44 + 2sin45 * cos 43.. )
But when you get to 45 degrees, there's no 2 angles to add up to 90. 45+45 is 90 but you only have one 90.
So then at the end there's a ... + sin45
Then when you take 2sin45 common
It becomes 2(2sin45) [cos44 + cos43.. + 1/2]
I have school starting next month and my math is geometry. I want to be as prepared as possible for it. Can anyone give me ideas to get prepared?
I see what you did
But that means you cannot cancel with denominator because 1/2 and 1
It's a 1 at the end
I have to go sleep it's 1 am here lol
Study
What else? Get a notebook to take notes, don't almost fail like Algebra? (itz cuz i didnt do my homework)
What grade are you in?
going into 8th
Don't waste your time
wdym? its a highschool credit. I need to pass cuz i dont want to retake
I'm still gonna study and take notes
Do homework
It make you practice maths
I FIXED MY ROLE
sorry
That’s normal for some people ig
Also changed your name because it's hard to spell but it's your choice just saying
I see
Kids these days are smart sometimes
HS geometry is such a joke of a class that you don't need to do much in the way of preparation
guys, why is the principle value of tangent is only related to sin(x)
they slow walk the shit out of it anyway
Like me when I was kid I thought moon has infinity gravity so it not haven fall
LOL
but not p, 1
just be able to do basic algebra and you'll be fine
Yeah but I got a C in Algebra 1, C- is failing in my school
i think cos should also be considered because tan is sin/cos
then brush up on your algebra
ok
can someone explain this question pls
You should know prealgebra before diving into algebra 1
nibbas answer the question pls
I knew x + 8 = 12 solve for x when I went into algebra 1
It’s defined that way
yeah but why
Nah bruh that is not only covered in prealgebra
like i want to understand it
It like ton topics
why only -p/2 p/2
if it weren't that way i could give you infinitely many angles with a given trig ratio
why?
sin, cos, and tan, are part of triangles right? or division
the circular trig functions by themselves are not invertible
Try plotting its graph
we restrict their domains so that we can invert them on those restricted domains
It’s defined to make it continuous for all values in its range
Because those ugly asymptotes
,w arctan(-21)
by definition, if you take the principal angle, you are just adding or subtracting multiples of 2pi
so the principle angle has the exact same position on the xy-plane
*principal
and hence tan, sin, cos, csc, cot, sec or whatever will also be the same
for this question, you just needed to find arctan(-21)
and all possible angles that give the same value when tanned (the inverse of arctan, to get back -21) are $-\arctan 21 \pm 2k \pi$, where $k$ is any integer
thank you @obsidian harness
god bless you
no worries!
south
How do you learn math effectively?
GUYSS!! i have an observed formula for
sin values
can anyone tell me a method to refine it??
It's a 1/2 because you factored out 2sin45 while it's just a single sin45. Sin45/2Sin45 becomes a 1/2.
Every angle had a pair adding to 90 so you could apply the 2sin45cos(etc) formula but sin45 didn't which is why it's alone
@anirudh.4.real
Well no
Cuz 90
This is like saying
Sin(alpha) = 0.34 is a formula sure it works for infinitely many values but it doesnt for way more
Tho this is kinda close to the first term of taylors series of sine so maybe
(Pi/180 ≈ 1/60)
Google exists
subdivide into triangle pieces and you have A = br/2
where b is the perimeter of the polygon and r is the radius of the inscribed circle
(τr)r/2 for the area of the circle
as for the perimeter we have
tan = opposite/adjacent
tan(τ/50) = opposite/r
b = 50 r tan(τ/50)
A ≈ 202.127
A (circle) ≈ 201.062
find k so that y +x=3k is tangent to y^2+x^2=k
googles explanations r kinda lacking ngl
sub in y = 3k - x into y^2 + x^2 = k and then you have a quadratic in x
thus the discriminant b^2 - 4ac must equal 0 to be tangent
if a + b = 90°, then
tan(a)tan(b) = 1
is there some way to generalize this to triplets of angles that sum to 180°?
assymetrically is fine
black magic
this breaks if you have a 90° angle tho
I mean this also breaks if a or b is 90
dividing both sides by tan(C) sort of fixes it
if you are willing to say that finite/tan(90°) = 0
why is tanc=0,tanc=-1 rejected
tanC = 0 implies C = 0
tanC = -1 implies C = -45°
both do not make sense in a triangle
tan C = -1 can also imply C = 135°
which could make sense or not depending on the triangle
Did I get this question correct? I calculated C to see if its the seconds highest side, which it was, but still not 100% sure
If you anyone can't read the shitty handwriting btw, x=80.49 and c=92.54
Got it thanks
PR and SQ intersect at right angles, cause it's a rhombus
so what must angle x be?
Can Angle sum property of a triangle be used?
ofc
So x 50°
yep!
So y?
honestly if you guess you'll probably be correct
Is it 40°?
yeah
Alternate interior angle?
a rhombus is just a special parallelogram so opposite sides are parallel
so by alternate angles, angle QPR = SRP = 40
ye
K thanks for the help!
no worries!
Joining bp
Or assuming o to be the centre and joining ob and op
Nothing worked
I guess
Yo whatup
[multiposted here: #help-33 message]

thank god you corrected yourself
bro replying to something that happened four years ago:
Cut triangle CED off, turn it and reattach it in an appropriate place ...
Hey can anyone suggest a good video for trigonometry... I am in junior year
guys I know this is kinda physics but related anyways
isn't the depth the z axis and the height the y axis?
I'd advise you to stare at this picture until it makes sense
btw this is maths, it has applications in physics with the magntiude of vectors of course
iik
there's the whole
(i am not Freya Holmer)
LOL
Can anyone give me a complete roadmap to trigonometry ?
Stewart's algebra and trigonometry
chapters 5, 6, 7 are on trig, including double-angle, half-angle, and product to sum equations
W man (Wow I am talking like a cool boys)
I always would love to solve some tricky questions
btw Google can make pie charts for you
of course if you want to do it properly you need to calculate the right angles and then draw them with your protractor
Didn't know that thanks
yeah Google Sheets
K
Use a pie chart when you want to compare parts of a single data series to the whole. For example, compare how many new customers were acquired through different marketing channels. Learn how to
check otu the examples
np
I can't believe I'm asking this, but this is unsolvable, right?
You can imagine sliding the point x on its line and it wouldn't affect the given angles. This means there simply isn't enough information.
Point x is fixed though since the length above it is equal to the base
This is a pretty tricky problem. Can you solve for the angle? Watch the video for the solution. I thank Barry, and I thank Akshay Dhivare from India for suggesting the problem via email.
Sources
https://gogeometry.blogspot.com/2008/05/elearn-geometry-problem-10.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ECGjyk5zb8
Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com...
classical problem
Do those small lines on each of those segments denote that they are equal?
yes
20 degree is the answer i think
40
this is an impossibly bad guess
wait
ah yeah no wonder
Fuck my life. Had I know that, I would have already solved it. I spent 30 minutes feeling like an idiot just because I didn't know about it.
I hate this. Imma be back.
Good luck
My geometry is a bit rusty NGL.
Never done a lot of it since secondary school.
Actually, did some in high school but not much.
I gotta practice some before I even attempt the easiest of problems or I will end up spending a lot of time feeling like an idiot.
does anybody have tips for determining how many degrees an 1 object has rotated from another object?
^^ "determining rotations
guys I just started trigo today
i mean I have done it before a bit (cuz IMO) but proper start was today
in how many dimensions?
you should just post the question that made you ask this question
the original one
I just started reading Euclid's elements, I'm wondering why does he reference circles using three points on the circumference when he earlier writes that a circle can be described by a center and a rdaius? Why not reference the circles like A, AB or something?
is that how circles are referenced in modern math, with 3 points on the circumference?
There's no deeper point to it -- it's just a practical way to explain to the reader which of several possible circles in the diagram he's talking about.
How can i reliabily find the angle of rotation of a conic with a xy term?
Just for curiosity
Thank u
How to find AOC
There are seveal ways. One of them starts by noticing that triangle AOB is isosceles.
Oh yeahhhh right
i didn't think like that. I just took AOC and ABC as 2 triangles
Im confused on how to set up the equation
Cause their are 2 angle of elevations, from the observers POV
And by the way I drew the picture, their can only be one angle
Akso "BL" stands for balloon.
presumably one balloon is right above the other?
otherwise we don’t have enough info to answer the question as you probably noticed
can someone help me study for geometry cbe please
now idk if to use unity or unreal
guys I think there's a typo on my book:
lim x -> 5 (g o f) (x)
if f(x) = { (x-1)² + 1 if x < 4,
10 if x = 4,
3x - 2 si x >4
}
and g(x) = ((x-1)² - 4/(x-2))
the answer says 14 but I get 140/11
I've asked to gemini it says 140/11 also
desmos says
so you are my last check
🥸
i also say 140/11
Can Anyone help with this
i) Pythagoras
ii) expand (x - 1)^2 + (x - 2)^2 = 5^2 and rearrange
iii) quadratic formula
then once you find x it's just x - 2 and x - 1 ofc
ii one is quadratic formula right?
no?
I think I understood how it arrived at the point for pi/4, but I can't find a way to arrive at the points for the other ones in the table. Could someone give me a light?
u can just find the side using pythagorus and quadratic and just prove the solution of the equation and the solution of the given equation are equal
right?
I also want to learn that kind of maths but I got no clue
the other values use the 30-60-90 triangle
sin 45 and cos 45 use the 45-90-45 triangle
I want to understand it so I don't have to memorize the table
so SOHCAHTOA gives sin 30 = 1/2, cos 30 = sqrt(3)/2
Intro to trig with a lurking mystery about cos(x)^2Full playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZHQObOWTQDP5CVelJJ1bNDouqrAhVPevHome page: https://...
(timestamped)
I want to learn everything but I don't have the teacher..
and don't know where to start
I am learning by myself
same
I'm kinda lost
stuck at basics
basic trig basic calculus and everything
grade 9 is kinda trash
read some books really
no interesting chapters in my book
Ok I'll try my best to find some
can anyone tell me what is sin inverse
and are sin inverse and arcsin the same?
probably yeah?
take angle ABC as x and angle AOC as 2x and see that triangle AOC and ABC both are isosceles
ohh is it used to find ratio
of two sides at a certain angle
it's used to undo sin
arcsin(sin(x)) = x if 0 <= x < 2π
like any
and are we talking about a right angled triangle?
soh cah toa
sin = opposite/hypotenuse
cos = adjacent/hypotenuse
tan = tg = opposite/adjacent
i know that but if i know the sides can i find the angles?
yes
well one entirely valid options that ancient astronomers did is to measure them
are there like formulas?
but if you can't for some reason then use that
huh?
no it's like
h = 5, p = 3
the angle between them
sin(angle) = p/h
ohh
yeah that angle
and if want to know the angle you use arcsin
yeah i want to learn that superpower
arcsin(sin(angle)) = angle = arcsin(p/h)
actually calculating it is something you would usually leave to a calculator
ohh
it's like sqrt
i thought we could find it on our own
thank you so much for your precious time 🙂
I'm determined to learn mathematical superpowers
a mathematician turns coffee into theorems
they can do alchemy
I'll try to learn it.
I was joking with you.....
When writing transformations in order, which order do I go in? My school teaches me to go from H shifts, Reflections or Stretches / Shrinks, and then V shifts. However, two of my tutors tell me to go from left to right: Reflections, Stretches / Shrinks, H shifts, and then V shifts
i agree with your tutors but honestly it doesn't really matter, you can kind of do it any order
I thought that perpendicular means when 2 lines like this + has four 90 degrees angles.
I don't see how PC T (upside down) AB
shouldnt it be PP' T (upside down) AB
the lines don't have to extend past the point of intersection, they just have to intersect at a right angle
hi, are ther any tips or tricks to easily graph quadratics, at the moment i know how to graph these with relative ease, but was wondering if there are any visual rules of graphs that may help me graph quicker
ik this may be a bit of a broad question
usually it suffices to find the vertex and direction, possibly plot a few points near the vertex, then sketch a parabola
yo anyone got any tips for entering geometry?
learn ahead
okay thank you
oh, thanks!
Can we find the no. of sides of a polygon without finding the exterior angle?
yes
interior angle of a regular polygon = 180( n - 2)/n
Ohh forgot that
it's actually derived from the exterior angle formula you know
180 - 360/n
= (180n - 360)/n
= 180(n - 2)/n
so honestly just use the exterior angle formula cause it's more natural
Find the function R as n approaches infinity. R raised to the power n are iterations of the function R
Bros
can anyone help me by explainting what the Congruent Diagonals Theorem is?
You mean like within certain quadrilaterals?
Basically means that in squares, rectangles, etc there are diagonals (from vertex to opposite vertex) of the same length, so if I draw a line between two opposite vertices in a few types of quadrilaterals it will be the same as any other line drawn.
is it not possible for it to be outside A and B because if it was outside than XAC+BAC wouldn't equal 180 and thats not possible
no, that's not the right reasoning
the key is that ACB = 100
observe that any point outside the circle will make ACB be acute, less than 90 deg
and any point inside the circle will make ACB be obtuse
clearly if X is outside line AB, there is no point on line g that will be inside the circle
if X is between A and B, then AXC + CXB = 180
CXB is a totally different angle to ACB
no worries
thanks bro
No problem
How? (i)
do you understand the hint?
Ya
did you try applying it, where did you get stuck
How old are you btw
13
are all quadrilaterals with perpendicular diagonals kites?
I'm pretty sure one has to bisect the other too
Tell me it wasn't in class 8th
Ncert
I think that chapter was called
data handling
Correct
Or statistics
It is
Kk I already got it
What's the prob
State
Wut?
Not really
He 13 now so yea
I mean only one has to bisect the other
They don't need to both bisect each other
No -- it's a simple matter to just pick one that isn't, e.g. the one with vertices at (-1,0), (0,1), (2,0), (0,-2).
does anyone mind if they could give me a brief demo or explaination of trigonometry
two trapezoidal prisms stacked one on top of the other ._.
idk
idevk if it has a name 💀
was watching this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Lm9EHhbJAY and at 7:00 she shows a cool Euclid proof of how to make a square with twice the area of a given square, and hints that there's a similar way to do so for three times the area. I can't figure it out. Does anybody know what I can search to find it?
Trisecting angles and calculating cube roots was a big problem for Euclid and his cohorts. Discussed by Zsuzsanna Dancso at MSRI.
More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓
TRISECT WITH ORIGAMI: http://youtu.be/SL2lYcggGpc
CIRCLE THE SQUARE: http://youtu.be/CMP9a2J4Bqw
Support us on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/numberphile
NUMBERPHILE...
or two intersecting pyramids
if you call side length of the given square 1, then you just need to construct a line segment that has length sqrt(3). One famous formula in geometry that has sqrt is pythagoras theorem
want: a² + b² = sqrt(3)²
if you have a = 1 and b = sqrt(2), then you should be good
So this gives one way to do it
draw diagonal of the square
draw perpendicular to it
use compas to construct a circle and cut off 1 unit length on that perpendicular
now draw the hypotenuse of that triangle
now construct a square on that hypotenuse
done
This almost certainly isn't the solution that requires least steps, but it's pretty easy to come up with
Oh snap thank you for this explanation, beautifully put
pythagorean theorem?
wow
Unrelated but I'm reading Euclid Book 1 Prop 31 - To draw a straight-line parallel to a given straight-line, through a given point. It seems overly complicated? Why can't you just make a perpendicular line through a random point on the given line, and then another perpendicular line through the given point to it?
is it a thing where it's easier to construct that way but more difficult to prove or sm?
what Euclid is saying it can be much more general than that
you can take any angle in fact
as long as the angle DAE equals the angle ADC
if DAE = ADC = 90 then that's a special case
ah ok thank you
looks like Word lmao
but yeah that's cool
lol
im having trouble with this problem
i know PQB similar to CQA
CPQ similar to ABQ
CQ/PQ = AC/PB
but im not sure where to go from here, theres no other similar triangles i can find and i cant see how to use what i have here to solve the problem
AQ * QP = BQ * QC by power of a point / intersecting chords theorem as well
lol it happens
still not sure what to actually do with that though
me neither
wait i might have something?
ive gotten that CQ/PQ + BQ/PQ = s/PC + s/PB which seems close
oh yeah thats it
hi
How come roq is bisected (into x and x)?
ping me please
This was the first question
this is the second
ANOTHER QUESTION:
How BQ bisects ang B in triangle ABC?
idk the answer, but you will love this one
(drawing is not very accurate tho)
I agree
atlaest for the second one
AC and Ab are tangles.
tangents*
PQ is the diameter
Could someone give me a hint for 167 here? I circumscribe the triangle then extend MD to get inscribed angles which subtend the same arc, creating equilateral FAD. But, I don't really know where to go or if that's helpful
ADC is similar to AMD by 2 angles. the rest follows directly
where's the second equal angle?
oh CAD is common sorry, thank you
np
,w substitute c = root(a^2+b^2 - 2ab*cosA) in root[(a+b+c)/2)(a+b-c)/2)(a+c-b)/2)(b+c-a)/2]
tada, 1/2 ab sin(A)
Q is incenter of ABC
recommend to see the latest Morley's theorem proof, suggested by Tran Quang Hung
nuh uh
uh huh
yeah yeah
I thought you were referrign to the first one
how?
just to make sure the distance formula is x2 -x1 to the power of 2 plus y2-y1 to the power of 2
and then square root right?
Famous 90+A/2 angle
yeah
Saving in plenty of problems
that requires bisection of B and C.
But I am literally asking how can we say it bisects B and C?
meoove accept my friend request
No, you are already have that angle in your theorem condition(90-A/2), so, there can be only one angle with measure 90+A/2
okay so something other is provided
another question
in the triangle problem, look at the last line.
How we transition from the last third line to the next one?
i think i answered ur problem but i meight be complety wrong
Sorry, had to go, its simple; (AXC)=(BZC)=(AYB)=2/7=> (XYZ)=1-6/7=1/7
help
If x,y are positive reals such that x+y=2
show that (x^3)(y^3)(x^3+y^3)≤2
i dont get it
Buy the way, in my opinion in this problem its better to calculate (ARX), coz 3(ARX)=XYZ
One approach would be to write x=1-a, y=1+a in which case x³y³ = (1-a²)³. Then the LHS of your inequality expands to a polynomial in a².
Can someone help me
no

what did i do wrong
i used cosine rule they used sine rule but i cant see anything wrong with what i did
but my answer is wrong
oh thanks!
No problem
Yk you could just use routh's theorem
wth
Prove that √(a+b-c)+√(b+c-a)+√(c+a-b) <= √a+√b+√c where a,b,c are sides of a triangle
good idea
sqrt(2y) + sqrt(2z) + sqrt(2x) <= sqrt(x + y) + sqrt(y + z) + sqrt(z + x)
nearly there, you just need to enforce an ordering on x, y, z since WLOG you can swap a, b, c
probably not
they should just be arbitrary positive numbers at this point
If they don't satisfy the triangle inequality, one of the LHS square roots will fail to exist.
oh but that's true
Oh.
idk
it looks easy but it's weird
Approach Zero: A math-aware search engine.
ah so $\sqrt{\frac{2x + 2y}{2}} \ge \frac{\sqrt{2x} + \sqrt{2y}}{2}$
south
sum up and it's done RIP
same
starting geometry this year, any tips for me?
yeah, if you're going to be just starting out take it slow and learn at the pace that's fast enough to keep up with your class, but slow enough that you can really take time to study and learn the material well. Remember, if you have any problems you can always come and post stuff in the help chats here
pay close attention to details
don't trust ur eyes(if u see a angle that looks like 90 or smth like that) u need to prove it
in geometry u can not trust ur eyes trust the number if yk yk
draw all radii
Have fun with cos tan and sine
I'm not sure how you study, but I'd recomend Kahn Academy. Im assuming your a freshman in highschool.
Radius
a is the center
AE and AF are the same length
isosceles
Yeh that’s what l got up to aswell couldn’t find the length of Ad though?
tryna work on that I haven't done geometry in a while
Ok thanks I would be so grateful if l could get the answer lol
The ratio to the circle radius is 10:7 ratio
yeah DE is the same as B to the circle
Wait really
So 10/17y + 2/5x gives the width of the rectangle
