#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 69 of 1
you are a figment of my imagination
i have a general doubt
let me eat then i tell
yeah
tan (360-θ) = θ
tan (360+θ) = θ
Now
I want to find the value of tan (1040)
So, first I take
tan (11π/2 + 50) = tan (50)
second
tan (1080 - 40) = tan (40)
[1080 = 6π]
@obsidian harness
no that's not correct
tan(1080 - 40) = tan(-40)
now, tan(-x) = -tan x
ohk
$\frac{\sin(-x)}{\cos(-x)} = \frac{-\sin x}{\cos x} = -\tan x$
southy
sin is odd and cos is even
thx
no worries!
They mean a study buddy, I believe.
how can I forget this
antimony obv
No that Sb
Maybe their capslock key was broken
shift X 2
so he would have said antimony
Maybe he was just lazy
Bold of you to assume i know chem 💀 but ask away there like a 3.2% chance i can help
leave this
Electronegativity should do ig?
nah not att all no connection
Oh no wait electron affinity would
Well oxidizing agents get reduced so they gain electrons, and Cl- has higher electron affinity than F- iirc soo yea Cl- should be a better oxidizing agent
I don't understand, If there is a oxiding agent it reduce itself how is it gaining e-
Well reduction is just a reduce in oxidation state, which is just a gain of electron
Nvm i was tripping hard ignore this
soka
Tho electron affinity is what you want
ya maybe but I understand
(And by an extended means electron gain enthlapy)
Endothermic reaction
No i dont, sorry
but i know endothermic
Endothermic is just those which take in energy backwards reaction are different at least definition wise
chemistry in maths discord
i've heard chemistry is just physics + stats
~~https://discord.com/channels/268882317391429632/1018703193473024061~~ i solved it, thanks
Is my reasoning correct?
geometry no bueno
Math > Physics+ Stats
Is calculator allowed
Hint: Cosine double angle formula: $$\cos(2\theta)=2\cos^2 (\theta)-1$$
Civil Service Pigeon
How?
Example 8?
Hint: Sine double angle formula: $$\sin(2\theta)=2 \sin(\theta) \cos(\theta)$$
Civil Service Pigeon
Further hint: ||Consider what you can do with sin(pi/15)||
try smt else
this gives me flash backs
Rewrite $\sin^2 \frac{\pi}{16}$ and $\cos^2 \frac{\pi}{16}$ using the cosine double angle formula
Civil Service Pigeon
Can u point out the mistake
what crct mean
probably "correct"
Then how to do can u teach me?
I am not expert as u
In trigonometry
Just learning
?
put $\theta=\frac{\pi}{8}$ and you get $\cos^2 \frac{\pi}{16}=\frac{1}{2} \left(\cos \frac{\pi}{8}+1 \right)$
Civil Service Pigeon
Ok i will try this way
ok just rewrite all the squared stuff using double angle and tell me what you get
Cos²tete-costeta/2+1
I can't read that.
1/2
did you mean to put 0 on the left hand side of the equal sign on the last two lines...
Why zero?
then why are there equal signs
i'm having a bit of trouble with this one
i did this first but i can't find a value for x
that length wouldn’t be 5 (in red) unless it’s a trapezoid
I'm confused on what to do w this question
but didn't they give 5
transformations of functions. These transformations apply for all functions
it’s unclear what the 5 is meant to mean precisely
the lines arent said to be parallel
Thus u cant say the red line is 5 too
oof
So would y=cos(4x)-3?
is the question possible?
close by no
cos(4(x-1))-3?
it’s clear that this doesn’t exactly work cause it’s still cos(something), which will output a number between -1 and 1
so the range is the same, but u got the -3 part right
why?
I'm jus confused abt what it means by "a factor of 4"
I kinda guessed that i had to factor out a 4 or sum.
Pretty sure theres a missing info
oh ok
that is what i thought
Yeah
what do they do?
The higher the y value, the longer the graph stretches
And vise versa for a lower value
if a graph is stretched vertically by a factor of k, then for each point on the graph (x, y), it becomes (x, ky)
u see how to write the transformation though?
wdym “W”?
I don’t understand why teachers teach about transformations of parabola, then separately like transformations about basic exponential functions and THEN SEPARATELY with the common trigonometric functions
but anyway
u should understand how that works u shouldn’t need that formula
do u see how to do the problem though?
I think so
what do u have?
The main thing I'm confused of is how do you find a sin equation, w a cos graph?
wdym? sine is cosine, just translated a little bit
Nah cause it's asking "find the equation of a sine wave that I'd obtained by vertically stretching the graph f(x)=cos(x)"
can u show me what it says exactly and like the choices?
or what it says
like a screenshot pls
This is the whole question
No multiple choice
That's the info it gave me and that's it 💀💀
oh that’s annoying it’s unclear if it refers to sine in particular or the trigonometric functions
if it doesn’t matter so much if u get this question right or wrong just use cosine I would say I’m not sure if sine wave refers to sine in particular (for example sinusoidal generally doesn’t not)
Alrr thank you 🙏🙏
Their's also one more problem that I'm stuck on
The horizontal shift is -5pi/4 and when I shifted the midline -5pi/4 from the x-axis it says I'm getting wrong 💀💀
your horizontal compression is wrong
you've made half a period 3pi/2 - (-3pi/2) = 3pi
instead of half a period being pi
i do not understand this problem
what does the tire diameter have to do with the speedometer?
I had to Google this to make sure.
If the tires have a larger diameter, it underreports your speed because it calculates based on tire rotations.
ah
so like, if i doubled the radius of the tires, it would half the reported speed?
That seems to be the case, but someone would have to correct me on that.
alr makes sense
I think tire size is proportional to how accurate the speedometer is.
If you add 360 degrees to an angle, the angle does not change position
Also 360 deg = 2 pi radians
call vertices ABCD (top left, top right, bottom left, bottom right).
Choose coordinate system such that
C = (0, 0)
D = (2, 0)
Then we have
B = (2 + 5/tan(80°), 5)
we don't know angle ABD, but let's pretend that we do. Then we have
A = (2 + 5/tan(80°) + 6cos(ABD-100°), 5 + 6sin(ABD-100°))
We have law of cosines that says
c² = a² + b² - 2ab cos(angle)
we can rearange for angle to get
angle = arccos[(a² + b² - c²)/(2ab)]
Or in our case:
θ(ABD) = arccos[(6² + (2 + 5/tan(80°) + 6cos(ABD-100°))² + (5 + 6sin(ABD-100°))² - (2 + 5/tan(80°))² - 5²)/(2 * 6 * sqrt((2 + 5/tan(80°) + 6cos(ABD-100°))² + (5 + 6sin(ABD-100°))²))]
(260°-ABD)*
Consider (C) a circle with center O and diameter [BC] and A a point of (C) / { B ; C }. M belongs to [BC] such that 3CM = BC
. (C') is a circle with center I' and diameter [CM] where (C') cuts (AC) in a point H. A' is a point of (C) \ { A ; B ; C } such that:
(A'B) // (AM) and I = A' * A where I is a ppint on [BC] \ { B ; O ; M ; C }
If S is the direct similitude with center H such that:
S: A •→ M, what is the angle of S and its relation?
Why I cannot solve this?
The variable is always eliminated
yet
there is an intersection of line
Do you know matrix row reduction
No
Fair enough
Is there an alternative?
I forgot it what it is
It looks like you’ve just subbed the equation into itself.
But I use the two equations, where should I substitute 3x + 2y = 48?
Here’s how I would do it: in both equation 1 and 2, move everything to one side. Set both equations equal then rearrange for y.
The red-circled equation is 2y+3x=48 with the expression for y substituted in.
Yes, which is where the error is.
Ah yes. Sorry, I didn't read enough of the context.
All good
I still can't understand the problem...
hwyyyyy
Does anyone know how to check ambiguous case
of what
Person
isnt the answer here wrong for c?
shouldnt the answer be only within the second and third quadrant where cos(x) is negative?
yeah the answer for 2x should be
and it is
but since we divided by 2 for x, some stuff will go in the first quadrant
but the sec is evaluated at 2x so thats what matters anyway and that is indeed in the second or third quadrant so theres no problem
tldr: 2x needs to be in the second/third quadrant, x doesnt
oh okay thanks
quite weird to understand at first though
trying to get through this haese green book before starting my IB math aa hl first school year xd
How do we find the angles for these three questions? The reasoning also please
DO/CO = BO/AO, pretty sure its just a geometry rule
Anyone want to solve the hardest problem from a Russian common 7th grade geometry textbook?
Inside the isosceles triangle ABC with base BC, a point M is taken such that ∠MBC = 30°, ∠MCВ = 10°. Find the angle AMC if ∠BAC = 80°.
Is M over or below segment [BC]?
i guess it depends on how you draw it
but its inside the triangle yeh
M is inside the triangle ABC. M doesn't lay on the line BC of the segmant [BC]
Would anyone be familiar with the formula "Acos(cx)+B"?
it's a cosine function without a phase shift
Thank you, would anyone also be familiar with determining amplitude using a point on a graph?
“Express in terms of sine only” is this correct?
What points do you have
Also see inscribed angle theorem, Sum of angles in a triangle, and sum of angles that make a straight line
can anyonde help with this problem I'm having trouble with what steps I should take next.
this is my steps so far
P(53.2,3802)
Square both terms, add them together, and the square root of that will be the first half of the answer. The OTHER half will be the cis(arctan(b/a)).
Sorry thought you had the max and min, dont know any other ways
That's alright, thanks for offering to help
Gosh, I hate signature assignments with a passion
this seems pretty impossible
Agreed. This is clearly one of those problems that expects you to be more intuitive. I don't know why project assignments are made this way.
kinda crazy
If G is centroid, then you can drop height AG
so you have triangle AHC and you know 2 of its angles
This is definitely advanced
If G is centroid then it divides the medians 2:1 is the property i think
if you call point at angle x M, and point below that N; then GM=AM -> BM = 3AM -> BM:AM = 3:1 -> MN:AN = 3:1 -> tan(x) = 1/3
I don't think there is correct answer
If my reasoning is solid it should be closer to 36.86989.../2
find the height
The whole configuration is symmetric under rotations about the line that connects the two sphere centers. Surely that includes the intersection.
Why do you think it should be an ellipse?
Oooh I get it now
I wasnt sure of the answer I was thinking in 2d even thought I was told it was three dimensional my bad
thank you
The square ABCD has a side length of 3. A point E is selected on ray AD (through D) such that DE = 4.
Draw circle O which is tangent to both the midpoint of EC and a point F on line AB. The radius of O may
be expressed in the form r/s where r and s are relatively prime positive integers. Find r + s.
@charred furnace Did you solve the folding in equilateral triangle problem? What was the solution?
i wanna know
I didn't
I was clueless and no one waa responding so I just asked for help for other simpler geom problems I couldn't solve
nvm found itt
Would it have killed them to include a sketch instead of just a description in words?
we are evaluating which graphs look similar only under the given interval
observe the the variable x is only within the arguments of the trigonometric functions given. so it can be thought of as an angle value input into these functions
note that cos |x| is the graph of cos x where x > 0, and then reflected across the y-axis to replace the part when x < 0
because cos |-x| = cos x for x > 0
focus on C1:
it might be easier to break apart the questions into smaller pieces...
start by evaluating for when x>0
well when x>0, x = |x|, so cos(x) and cos(|x|) are the same here
now look at x<0
when x<0 |x| = -x, so cos(|x|) = cos(-x), however we can recall that cosine is an even function, hence cos(x) = cos(-x), thus cos(|x|) = cos(x) over this interval too.
Lastly, we can affirm that cos(0) = cos(|0|).
We have shown that these graphs are the same over the entire interval.
We can apply this process for C2 and C3 to evaluate if they are the same or not
the other two you should be more comfortable with: for C3 for example, try sketching out $\sqrt{x^2}$
southy
pay attention to what happens when x is negative
so that applies to when tan x is negative
I believe the correct answer is only C1, answer choice A
ah wait I mixed up sin and cos
yes A is correct
C2 equivalence counterexample:
let x = -pi/6, sin(x) = -1/2, |sin(x)| = 1/2. Thus when x = -pi/6, the graphs are not equivalent.
C3 equivalence counterexample:
let x = -pi/4, sqrt[(tanx)^2] = sqrt[(-1)^2] = sqrt(1) = 1,
tanx = -1, hence the two graphs are not equivalent at x = -pi/4
hope this helps @pastel gate
Yess thank you!
I need help with these two
yes
what are the three angles
86, (4x-7), (7y-1)..? but I didnt solve them yet
oh sure
ok
so yeah this is true
so 86 + 4x-7 + 7y-1 = 180, right?
yes
so do I js use that equation?
forgot what this is called but 💀
uhh supplementary angles?
what are the angles that add up to 180 deg
nah, theres only 2 angles this time
so 9x+4 and 7x-1?
ohh
yea
ok kewl
so recap: when there is a figure like that, then u would spilt to two eq??
or js whenever there is a value given..?
if you have two unknowns you should try to find two equations
is it possible to calculate the circumference from a circle segment, but only the circumference from the segment itself.
nvm got it, its 2* r* pi * theta/360
are you still having trouble with question 1?

How can i find the initial speed in x
oh there is a cool solution
but it's not geometry
Did you know any server that i can ask about this physic nightmare?
At 30°, the vertical part of the initial velocity is exactly half of the launch speed.
How did "50x" get there?
(a-b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab apply this identity by replacing a=25 and b=x
I hope that helps @upper karma
@harsh pond
It does, thank you!
Wtf is that notation
Solve for his instagram lmao
U : initial velocity
Ux: initial velocity along x axis
Uy: initial velocity along y axis
@: is just the angle of initial velocity
i was gonna say vertically:
(1/2)mv² = mgh -> v = sqrt(2gh) ≈ 16.573 m/s
total v ≈ 33.15 m/s
Great solution 👍
(kinetic energy at ground = potential energy at maximum hight)
Hey
How do I prove that the number of diagonals of a point in a polygon is n-3?
To get the total number of diagonals of a polygon of n sides I would use the formula
$\frac{n(n-3)}{2}$
Pi, a future fluent jp speaker
n-3 is the number of diagonals per point
oh you should draw some polygons out to see
one of the points is the point you chose
two more points are given by the sides of the polygon
so that's n - 3 possible points left to make diagonals
oh
Can anyone help me with this?
343. Scrooge McDuck's money bin is surrounded by a 4.0-meter-high fence at a distance of 12.0 meters. The Beagle Boys are trying to climb the fence from the outside using a ladder to reach the wall of the money bin. How long must the ladder be at least to reach the wall of the money bin?
Hint: Let x be the distance from the bottom of the ladder to the fence and y the distance from the top of the ladder to the ground. You can find the relationship between the variables x and y by using similar triangles.
They cant have a diagonal with him and with the 2 neighbors points so there remains n-3
what does "at a distance of 12.0 meters" mean
does it mean the ladder is 12.0 meters away from the fence?
or wut
or does it mean 12.0 meters away from the money bin
i feel like this is a stupid problem either way 💀
it means the fence is 12 meters away from the wall of the money bin
ok then this is a stupid problem 💀
ik it's annoying
if you have a triangle
with a height of 4
a length of whatever you want
whats the minimum hypotenuse length
ye
u know?
the answer should be 21.6 meters but I have no idea how to get to it
uhm
now i dont understand again 💀
this is what i interpret the problem as
the 12m is completely irrelevant, we're trying to minimize y
whats the square box?
like y is the height on which the ladder touches the bin
the money bin
what happened to the wall?
the fence?
it's the small one
the small what?
oh
here's the one from the book if it helps
ohhhhhh i thought "the wall of the money bin" meant the fence 😭
hmm i see now
ye I forgot sry guys

and because there are like two monomorphic triangles you should probably find x and y with the help of them or smth
the hard part is how tf do I get an equation of it to see the shortest possible ladder
like because it is in a logarithm and exponent book with derivatives I would think you need to use them. I think with an equation you could from its derivative form find out the minumum and that is the smallest possible ladder?
So we have: $y = \frac{4(x+12)}{x}$ right?
Closer
oh LOL i thought we were supposed to do it without that 😂
how did you get that?
I'm not sure maybe?
Similar triangle
x/4 = (x+12)/y
y = 4(x+12)/x gotcha
Using Pythagorean theorem we have: $L = \sqrt{x^2 + (\frac{4(x+12)}{x}})^2$
Closer
😔
Wait
oh now I see
(x+12)^2 but yea
$L = \sqrt{(x+12)^2 + (\frac{4(x+12)}{x}})^2$
Closer
Imma use Wolfram Alpha
ok 💀
Ok. It is 21.6 so looks right
how did u get that
me over here doing it manually:
when I took the root of the derive I got something very different
That is just the value of x
You need to plug x to L to get the length of the ladder
oh ye that also 🫠
It doesnt work to do it on this calculator because it is only for derivatives
so gotta do it again on another one
yea mk im not doin this without a calc 💀
Are there only 4 machin like formula which in a form of 2 terms, and both arguments are 1 over some integer? or there are only 4 which were found?
“Find the acute angle formed by the two lines”
y=1/3x + 1
and
y=-1/2x - 3
How to find this very fast without graphing it?
Since the slopes are known do I simply use the fact that tan(theta) = slope?
Then solve for theta on both expressions and add the angles together?
Proof of angle between two lines. Finding the angle between two lines on the coordinate plane have slopes m1 and m2. Proof or Derivation of angle between two lines. Formula to find angle between two lines on the coordinate plane. Condition for two lines to be parallel and perpendicular in coordinate geometry (Mathematics). Problem based on findi...
So I am starting Geometry Honors this upcoming school year for my freshman year, would there be anything good for me to know before the school year starts?
For this question, why do you know that 5pi/3 is the "second time" Luiza reached 1.2 m?
That's what the vid says 😭
I see thoo
Well actually, I didn't send all the work
This is everything
I was jus questioning, about why 5pi/3
And not any other value that equals to 1/2
Is it cause 5pi/3 is between the values [-pi/2,pi/2]?
they said "the second time"

can arcsin[(1-cos(rational))sqrt(2 - 2/sqrt(5))] ever be rational?
that root = tan(36°) + tan(18°) if that helps
except for the trivial solution where cos = 1
rational in degrees*
i tried plugging specific values into cos and wolfram alpha seems to know that the result is irrational for them somehow
edit: it was in radians mode
Alternatively:
Draw your regular trig diagram with angle A, move (cosA, 0) towards origin such that you are effectively scaling the segment (cosA, 0) <-> (1, 0) by a factor of X keeping (1, 0) in place), Draw the perpendicular up from until it intersects circle. A new angle B is formed. Is it possible A/π, B/π are rational and X = sqrt(2-2/sqrt(5))
If you know trigonometry no one can make you a fool
If sin rule doesn't work use cosine rule
idk if that helps dude
This looks very nontrivial
Can someone pls help me with number 9 I've been working on it for an hour and its due today at midnight.
Does sinA cos B + sinB cosA ring any bells
Yes
Can you identify A and B for your problem?
This is the example problem given.
Well answer what i asked you
sin A is sin x
I got it thanks for helping.
Solve: cosA+cos2A+cos3A=0
Do you know cosA + cosB identity?
💀 i asked the one who asked the que but sure

Can someone help solve this equation
Write cot in sin cos
I did that, and got to here, and this is the part where I got stuck
factorise
you cannot cancel out functions, it is prohibited
It looks like he's not cancelling a function, but a number that happens to be produced by a function.
he cancelled sin(t), now he have to put sin(t)=0
but that’s not a solution
f(x)/f(x) = 1, f(x) - f(x) = 0
yep right way to do it
If sin(t) were 0, cot(t) wouldn't exist in the first place.
After getting numeric solutions at the end, he'll need to verify that they don't have sin(t)=0, of course.
that will give t = pi/2
yes
but it is prohibited to cancel functions
Wht is the geometrical difference between inverse and non inverse trigo
wdym by the geometrical difference
There's no such prohibition that I know of.
@obsidian harness Like constriction wise
How they r different like one who invented it must have though of some sort of inverse triangle or something
why is \frac{\pi}{3} (60) not in the answers?
shouldnt it be in the needed 1st and 3rd quadrant and suffice?
where's pi/3 even coming from
i mean the principal value is 30 since the inverse tangent of \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} is 30
30+30=60
why are you doing 30+30
you can begin from 270 too
the end of thge third quadrant
you get to 60
is this somethign to do with the domains?
for what you're asking, no
I just don't know why you're doing stuff like 30+30
tan(30°) is 1/sqrt(3)
tan(60°) is not that, why do you think 60° is relevant here
also wdym by begin from 270
the end of the domain
im subtracting the end of the domain using the principal value
that's not how reference angles work
how woudl you solve this exercise
im selfstudying so i make some mistakes
ive gotten the gist of it
you add/subtract from the horizontal axis depending on your quadrant
and I still have no idea why you did 30+30
the reference angle to
tan(t) = 1/sqrt(3)
is pi/6 or 30°
since tan is POS in Q3,
a Q3 solution would be pi + pi/6, which they've simplified to 7pi/6
and then add 2pi to each one for more solutions
i thought by addign the reference angle together and checking if the angles are within the domain of the quadrants, you could find the angles needed
that's completely wrong
why 2pi
so if you subtract from the 1st quadrant, 90-30=60
no
keywords: horizontal axis
if you look up reference angles trig,
you should see images where they're measured from the horizontal, NEVER vertical
you mean this?:
yeh
Are these the only two solutions? Because if I got it right, it would show a green checkmark, so im not 100% if these are the only solutions
show work
$\cos t=0$ has the additional solution of $t=\frac{3\pi}{2}$ and $\cos t=\frac{3}{4}$ has an additional solution of $t=2\pi-\cos^{-1} \left(\frac{3}{4} \right)$
Civil Service Pigeon
Think of it geometrically: What does cos(t)=0 tell you?
Ohhhhhh I get it
Wait nvm
I get the part where cos(t)= 0, which makes its pi/2
But why the 3?
Sooo ... can you answer the question?
No, their's still sum im not getting 😭
I'm trying to scaffold the explanation
But if you're not going to cooperate and leave me talking to myself
then there's rlly no point in me continuing to engage
What 💀
I asked "but why the 3?"
Like why do we add the 3 in
I get that cos(0) is pi/2 but im still not sure why the 3 is being added
I am having an issue with the use of the inverse trig functions in linear and quadratic trig questions because it says in my teachers note to "use inverse cos" but the number im getting in not even close to his despite me putting in the exact question
Show the question
switch degree/radians mode
are you sure
arccos(0)?
i got question.
How do i make Parallelogram with these values (draw)
a = 6,5 cm ; e = |AC| = 8 cm ; Angle Beta 75 degress
small letter is wall and point is caps letter
what tools do you have
And do you have a diagram? Doesn't need to be to scale, but it's hard to respond without knowing how those letters relate to each other.
yeah wait
i got scale , set square , protractor divider
i got construction procedure ( i used google translator )
and sketch
does this help 😭
lmk if u read allat
Cleaned up a bit.
I would start with solving triangle ABC, where you already know two sides and an angle. Do you happen to already know an approach for solving SSA triangles?
Wait, no, you wanted to draw it rather than compute it.
Then just start by drawing AB of the right length, then angle B with a protractor, and finally point C where an 8 cm circle centered on A intersects the right leg of angle B.
Finally draw paralell lins from A and C to met in D.
Yeah thats pretty much what I did thank you i needed to be sure if I got it right
Maybe we do or dont calc it but basically goal was "draw" it and write down step by step what I done
can someone check my work on whether or not the steps are fine?
if the circles are internally tangent and the points J, K, and G are collinear, and so are points J, I and F, why must IK and JG be parallel?
i need this as part of something
where are E and F? and what is that odd notation
thanks!
Because the two circles are related by a simple scaling of the plane centered on J, and this scaling also preserves the two lines out of J. So the triangles IJK and FJG are related by the same scaling and are therefore similar.
Oh, that's actually neat. (Sorry didn't see that before I typed).
I hate homothety
its soo boring
Well, move to the hyperbolic plane, then.
😨
it didnt ask for more points but wasnt sure and which notation do u mean?
everything is fine
kk I submitted it
wait
are you supposed to prove the triangles congruent of the line segments
uh yea
if it’s the lines you need to put them congruent by cpctc
ohh
since the triangles are equal the lines should also be equal
uh I cant unsubmit..
but I can till the teach grade it
it’s kinda blurry (the triangles)
its js sm going on
sorry here
yes, geometry is my specialty
yea I read ur status lol
yes, i think I was the teachers favorite cuz my average
oh wow thats nice
kk
dude ima be in this channel for the rest of my life
Idk where else to ask this so what's the definition of lines/line segments in circular geometry?
could be wrong cause idk what is 'circular geometry'
isnt a line js a set of points that are all aligned
To define one line in the plane, js put two points
Basically just geometry on a circle is the simplest way I'd try to define but it can go to higher dimensions
Oh
Forget my definition then
though whats the point of geometry on js a circle
Yeah cuz normally in euclidean geometry afaik we interpret the first axiom of euclidean geo to mean if you give me two points I can give you a unique line segment that may not be true on a circular geometry
Geometry on earth
Would be similar
is there a word for a general sphere? Ie “ A set of points that are all the same distance from r In any dimension given any metric space” so segments and points are included
N-balls, n dimensional circles and so on all work I think
N dimensional circles/spheres are probably the best
Maybe but lines on a sphere don't behave as nicely as they do on euclidean geometry
Is there a way to understand trig identities
Or do I just have to remember them all
Both
You could always derive them on your own whenever necessary
So yes you do have to remember the basic ones
There’s a way to derive like sin(A+B) and those????
imo the basic ones are easier to derive than not so basic ones
there is a way but you cant do that whenever you need it cuz the way is fairly long
Damn
lmao thats better

the other option is rotation matrix but those are similar
if you dont know understand matrix multiplication its still annoying
i just read this and it isnt really that helpful but ok
the answer here is right imo
well the hint's pretty much enough
In a quadrilateral ABCD inscribed in a circle, the bisectors of angles A and B intersect at the point E lying on the side CD. It is known that CD : BC = 3 : 2
Prove that CD=BC+AD
how
For example, draw line parallel AB, going through E
motivation?
Get two equal triangles
Here is full solution, final part just counting segments
thx
No problem
How do you conclude that DE and EC have the lengths you claim?
it’s a chord and it’s being cut in the center I think idk how to explain it
i’m rusty in this subject lol
Oh, I think I see. Since |H1E|=|H2E| together with the two black angles being equal, there are two congruent triangles making |EC| equal to its counterpart on the left.
hello
hi just ask your question
I need help with geometry. I can't find any geometry book in Spanish that explains it well. I can read English more or less well. If someone knew of a book/course that explains it well in English, I wouldn't have a problem.
PS: I'm using Google Translate. If that's why I have bad diction.
I have a problem if you want to try btw
https://i.warosu.org/data/sci/img/0147/14/1659324540793628.pdf
don't know your level but this Olympiad geometry book is really well-written
or if you're looking for easier stuff, Khan Academy (a website with videos and interactive practice problems) is good
Needed help with trigonometry.
Khan Academy if no one else has anything better
besides aren't there tons of YouTubers who explain JEE stuff
just type in JEE trigonometry into YouTube
Khan academy is there ah
lol yeah lets go
friend me
alralr
Bruh there are hundreds of trig identity
do you want what like
Main ones ig
everything does and stuff
use sohcahtoa
I rlly don’t know trig
Need help in trigonometry
No no
But for the most used one you can search google or download an app
Sin(A+B)
nope don’t know that
Let's solve some jee questions?
Sinacosb+sinbcosa
What whole u want?
Download a formula app might be a choice
you should learn how to derive those equations from what you know already
for instance, sin(a + b) = sin a cos b + cos b sin a
what happens when a = b = x?
you get the formula for sin(x + x) = sin 2x ofc but what's on the RHS?
how about cos(a + b) = cos a cos b - sin a sin b
what happens when you replace b with -b?
There are, you just dk them
I just use this one.
(Taken from HKDSE M2 paper.)
Of course, it's better to use these identities without having to look up a table. Simply memorising the first two in the above table, and you can derive the other 8.
does minus-plus just mean that the first answer is from subtracting
yes
rest sure but the tan(a+b) will be calculative to derive so id say remember that too
im having trouble proving every cyclic trapezoid is isocoles
angles
ive tried using congruent triangles, stuff with the fact that means all the circumcenters of any set of 3 vertices of the trapezoid would be the same point, but i cant get it
ive tried that
well u should get it directly from there
what’s true about the angles
trapezoid would have the sides perpendicular to a radius, no?
ok?
i know theres a bunch of isocoles triangles i can make
that’s way more than u need
what did u do?
using the fact BAD + ADC = 180 and the same for the other two angles
u can do it in like line: Since opposite angles are supplementary and so are the “same-side interior angles,” we get that the base angles are congruent
therefore it is isosceles
how do you know opposite angles are supplementary
it’s cyclic
angle D is half of arc ABC and angle B is half of arc ADC
what do u get when u sum them
yeah
that’s something u should really know about cyclic quads (in fact if the opposite angles are supplementary, u can show by contradiction that the quadrilateral must be cyclic)
i did know that i just didnt think to apply it here

<BAC = <ACD because parallel, so chords BC and AD have equal length, done.
\int x^2 dx
BAC and ACD aren’t similar so wdym?
so what
parallel lines
who said anything about similarity
property of circles, equal angles => equal chords
?
??
ye i think If four sides of parallelogram sides touches a circle like this then it will be 👍
do u mean what shape will it be ?
oh then it will be a rhombus
Why?
never a parallelogram
given the 4 sides r tangents to the circle, u can use the tangent property to prove it
either a rhombus or a square
What if both options in the answer?
the ans is wrong maybe..
lemme find u a picture
like this one
its a rhombus
square
In my question both option are persent in the answer?
No further condtion given
you'd answer rhombus
as all squares are rhombuses
but not all rhombuses are squares
sounds
but maybe thats the best fit
Given answer is rhombus

as demonstrated above, such a parallelogram can be drawn that isn't s square so that can't be correct
Just consider that square is special type of rhombus, when u move rhombus diagonals in equal position(i mean length of diagonals)
Can I draw circle inside rectangle?
No, only ellipse
If sum of the opposite sides of quadrilateral is equal than u can inscribe circle in it
Ol less trivial sign, If there are four triangles into which the diagonals of a convex quadrilateral divide it, the following relation holds for the radii of their inscribed circles: 1/r1+1/r3=1/r2+1/r4.
Another sign: if u drop a perpendiculars on sides from diagonal intersection point(a,b,c,d respectively ) and for opposite heights will be following that relation: 1/a+1/c=1/b+1/d
And, by the way, 4 incenters will lie on one circle
I had this question in my math test today. WTH ARE THEY TRYNA DO MAKING ME FIND THE Y INTERCEPT OF THE PERPENDICULAR BISECTOR OF 6 PAIRS OF POINTS??? It's not hard it's js teadious.
There were 5 questions the other 4 were not as bad, this one is just crazy...
😔
you can do it with some calculator tricks, annoying but not that bad
i assume calculator not allowed?
calculator was allowed, how do you do it fast with calculator?
The only way I know how to do it was to solve for the slope, then take the negative reciprocal, then solve a linear equation for a y intercept
how? I only know what I said above, what can you do with the calculator to speed things up (other than doing some basic arithmetic instead of doing that yourself)
depends on the calculator, what do you have access to?
I use desmos scientific calculator on my phone
i don't think you can do anything too fancy with a scientific calculator unfortunately
Any ex-USSRer here? If I read: △ABC = △DEF, can I be sure that, in particular, ∠A = ∠D or AB = DE?
(I assume that Russian tradition about this question is different from Western)
I hate this
if we are thinking of the same app, you can say
x1 = -4
y1 = 5 ...
then write all your equations in x1, y1 ... and it will give you the answer, then just change the values on the top and the answer will change
even if you don't have a calculator, you can actually solve the general case and the final expression simplifies a lot (not as much as i would've liked tho)
For us, this usually means that each vertex corresponds to each(A==D, B==E, C==F)
oh? You can do this? Let me try... OMG YES YOU CAN SET VALUES FOR VARIABLES TYSM I CAN PUT FORMULAS AND STUFF YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
dumb question but this is 10 - 2 and 7 - 4 right?
slope = rise/run = change in y/change in x = (10-2)/(7-4) = 8/3
aight, thanks easy
how to make polygons with x vertices and fill them with triangles
What is the theta angle
is that 3 degrees?
30
Believe it's 30 degrees
Because in that little right triangle in the box
If the line is the normal then it's perpendicular to the slope so it's just 180-90-60
Would this be an understandable geometric proof that (a-b)(a+b) = a^2 - b^2 ? (the vectors are there to be arrows)
I would recommend losing all of the irrelevant names for points. (Perhaps find a more suitable drawing software than a geoetry sketching app?)
Also, it will be easier to follow what's going on if you make b more clearly different from a-b.
thank you.
Currently doing a taster for vectors, coterminal angles and mathematical logic in Year 10 math. Any general tips or diagrams I should be referring to? I'm gonna need all the help I can get if I'm gonna do really well in the subject next year. (plus, im trying to get a really good teacher employed at my school)
30
Must be 30
2theta +120=180 theta=30
Sum of angle on a 2d plane
Is 180
Sorry lineqr
Wrong method but correct answer
Hh
guys I'm doing geometry, what's the hardest concept
and any tips about where to study for them
there's a lot of hard stuff in geometry
I heard from a lot of people that proofs is the hardest?
also difficulty is subjective, it doesn't make sense to say what the hardest is
No, that's the basics
true
do u know any place to study for that
are you studying this for school or for competitions?
I'm not very familiar with this, but probably try Khan Academy
i generally struggled with more advanced circle problems because at first i didnt fully understand the constructions i feel like that is a pretty common issue
Ima solve it
15
The minimum number of vertices in the triangulation that satisfies the given estimate is 15 I think
thats what I was thinking
definitely
the answer is definitely 12
100%
no way around it
its atually?
i have no idea, what am i solving for 😂
