#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 65 of 1
,calc 4*sqrt(26)
whats the total surface area
Result:
20.396078054371
bro
@silent plank is that right
u just said it was 4
😦
no
yes
show
😿
circle o has radius 6
STOP CRYING
Yes
so whats the total surface area for year i dont get it
,calc 20.396078054371*365
Result:
7444.5684898454
answer
distance o from p is 4
ab is parallel to op and dist. between it is 2
op = radius of circle + distance
Yep
👍
then om = radius - distance from ab to op which is 4
now there is a triangle
u use the pythagorrus
u get am^2 = 20
am = root(20)
am = 1/2 of ab (midpoint), then ab = 4*sqrt(5)
if circle is at 0,0 in cartesian plane
then p is at 10,0
wait
no
Hmm?
What is it
Ye
we need someone who specialises in geometry
My answer came 278
rachit
can i use trigonometry in it? @void roost
Yes
is it in the syllabus
what?
/canu help me with last question
later
when is later
nvm i cant find whats wrong
12hrws
nooooo
undefined
how do i set up the two similar triangles?
i think ADC is similar to DCB
because DCB+DCA=90 DCA+CAD=90 DCB=CAD
so the answer is 1
i think
how?
cancel out the cds
btw 1 is the correct answer
because triangle ACD is similar to the whole triangle, ABC
AD corresponds to AC, while CD corresponds to BC
the ratio would come out to be
AD/BC=CD/BD=AD/CD
how are you gonna cancel out the CDs?
oh wait
I didn't read the options correctly
My bad
yeah, have to prove that it's similar to the whole triangle
or
that its similar to the other
which i think works too
but im not sure
thats wht @flint ingot
did
i mean u dont necessarily know its a rectangle just from the right angles
mmm you're right
Can someone give me the table of trigonometric ratios please?
Hi! If I have a triangle with 2 sides equal to 3 and 4, will the 3rd side always be 5?
Could i write it as x^2=(r-a)^2+(r-b)^2?
yes
nope
there is a triangle with sides 3 4 4
infinitely many triangles with two sides 3 and 4
if there were only one triangle then all triangles having those sides would be congruent, and i bet u havent heard of SS congruence
Ah yes… forgot that it could also be 3 4 4. Thanks!
Will ‘AC’ in arbitrary pentagon inscribed in a circle always be greater than any of the triangle sides? Or is there a way to get AC be equal to one side?
By "the triangle sides" do you mean AB,BC,CD,etc?
In that case the triangle ABC with sides AB, AC, CB
Ok so, for any triangle, we can circumscribe a circle, right?
And then once we have that circle, we can then pick two points on that circle to be our last two vertices of the pentagon (D and E)
And clearly we can pick triangles where two sides have equal length
So in this case, if I say that AC will always be greater than one of the sides, it will be a wrong statement?
It would be wrong because it would be equivalent to saying that for every triangle ABC, AC is greater than one of the other sides
Alright, thanks!
And last question about this task. If I want to proof that AC=CE by using the sine theorem, will I have to make a system like on photo (got result by using sine theorem, then with triangle angle property (the sum is 180) and trigonometric formulas get proof that they are equal?
bro i keep getting mid scores in geo
93%
in the last qiz i did i got 96.7%
30 question quiz 20 mins
Hey there. Could someone help me learning Law of Cosines?
Hi, what do you need help with?
Actually, i would like to know how to know the sin, cos or tan of an angle that is not 30, 45 or 60.
I'm not good at math lol
and also i didn't understand a lot about law of cosines
that's what i am studying on school rn
I’ve learned several methods in school. Bradis table (there will be angles and their sin and cos and you can find tg (tan) and ctg by using them), some trigonometrical conversions (like a formula for sin of sum of angles) can help you with getting e.g. cos(120 deg) also sometimes it is useful to build a rectangular triangle and find sin by using the cathetus and hypotenuse (I think sometimes it might be too hard to build it) and of course calculators. I think you should also understand the trigonometric circle, at least how to work with it and understand which quarter gives e.g. negative cos and positive sin
thank you so much.
As far as I know, usually it is enough to know the main formula. Then you can get a formula of an angle (it’s cos)
I hope I didn’t say any misinformation. Please correct me if I was wrong somewhere. Good luck with trigonometry!
Thank you so much, Triste! Btw, are you brazilian? because "triste" is a portuguese word.
No. Word was translated to French or Italian and became my nickname, don’t really remember which of them, but not to Portuguese
oh, but cool username anyway
Ty :D
I assume it will be angle-angle (4) because there are two pairs (actually 3 pairs, but 2 is enough) of equal angles given in the conditions. I hope didn’t miss anything.
the answer for the first image is 3), 4) for the second, 3) for 3rd, 1) for 4th and 2) for the 5th
4, the other 3 are postulates for congruence, but since its looking for similarity best answer is angle angle since we can tell at least 2 of the angles are equal meaning so by definition, the second triangle is some scaled version of the first.
basically, aa (4) shows similarity since as long as 2 triangles are proportional, theyll have equal angles
Hey I'm in this class next school year!
<@&286206848099549185> can tell me the the diphenthine equation try to explain like you are explaining a ninth class students and also can anyone tell me BPT or Thales theorem
@frail hawk is the value of 'x' 105 degree ? u can use basic mathematics rule to find it out
@digital kindle can you tel me the bpt and diphenthine equation and explain like you are explaining 9 class student
If you can
I am a 9 grader
Yes i forgot about the equilateral triangle
They are equals, i forgot about it in that time 
no problem
Hello @digital kindle
Can you tell
Me
The bpt
And diphenthine equation
Explain like you explaining 9 grader
<@&286206848099549185>
@frail hawk
Hello @frail hawk
Well i cant even spell English well and i must using Google translate to know the English of equilateral triangle

When you add a non-volatile solute to a solvent, the boiling point of the solution increases. This is BOILING POINT ELEVATION @tranquil musk
In maths
I don't know the the word exactly
Can you think
Diphenthine equation
It has some mistake
Sorry
@digital kindle
Actually, "Diphenthine equation" doesn't seem to be a standard term in chemistry
no prob
Wait lemme check
i think u are referring to basic proportionality theorem
Ya
Thales theorem
And also can you tell me the fermats theorem
Explain like you're explaining to class 9 student
I am 9 grader
Definition:
If a line is drawn parallel to one side of a triangle, intersecting the other two sides, it divides those two sides proportionally.
In Simple Terms:
In a triangle, if a line parallel to one side cuts the other two sides, the segments created on those sides are proportional.
for eg. in a triangle ABC , if DE is parallel to BC then AD/DB=AE/EC
Ok
Thanks
And fermats theorem
Are you Indian? @digital kindle
Hello
Is there anyone here
Fermat's theorem states that there are no positive integers with value a,b,c which satisfies the equation - a^n + b^n = c^n . Provided that n>2 @tranquil musk
yeah brother
i am presently in 10.
What?
why?
im from kolkata n i study in NATIONAL GEMS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL (ICSE)
Ok
@tranquil musk I read about it.
I am in cbsc
from ?
Fermat's Theorem is nothing tough .
oo. nice to meet you my friend
Me too
Nice to meet you
Can I send you friend request
Can you be my friend in Discord
yeah ok
Ok
All the radiuses equal 1 cm
What is the area of the rectangle
I understand that the bottom side of the rectangle is 6
whats being asked?
the area of the rectangle
^
Does anyone have any ideas?
The all-yellow circle is the inscribled circle of the right triangle. There's a formula for the inradius of a right triangle that should let you write an equation to find the vertical leg when you know the other leg is 6 and the inradius is 1.
Thanks!
I thought about this inscribled circle but i dont know any formula related to it
I didn't either, but then I googled inradius in right triangle :-p
But this formula uses two legs, hypotenuse and inradius. We know one leg and inradius, so since we dont know the hypotenuse, we cannot find the second leg
And if we knew the hypotenuse there would be no need to use this formula, since we can apply pythagoras
Maybe i should solve system of equations
Thanks
I understand it now
It looks so easy now
I struggle with geometry
Try using Khan Academy, it’s free and it has excellent lessons on Geometry and Trigonometry.
Thanks, i have tried to learn limits using khan academy
But from what level of geometry should i start? What stage should i begin with?
The preference is all up to you, and your struggle points. Personally when I have lots of free-time I go on there and do lessons of both Geometry and Trigonometry, just to keep my mind refreshed on the fundamentals and all of the identities.
I was imagining saying $$\frac{6+x-\sqrt{6^2+x^2}}{2} = 1$$ and then rearranging algebraically to get a quadratic equation.
Troposphere
(Oh, that is what Able scribbled on the diagram too).
Im pretty bad at math but I need to know this for programming purposes.
How the fuck do vectors work if there are two different units lmfao
There are two connected bodies, the right circle does a 10m/s^2 force down.
What is the angular velocity of the left circle? (the distance is 5m)
Can you show the full problem statement, please?
It sounds like you have some unstated assumptions along the lines of "the left circle is fixed in space", but I'd rather not have to resort to guessing.
I might as well just say the full problem
The two circles are connected, theyre a bit useless actually, just look at their center.
If the circle on the right does a force of 10m/s^2 down, what would be the equivelant for the vector in the left circle?
Heres the problem: I don't know actual vectors
so i cant word my problem well
To be honest, that sounds like gibberish. I don't think "a circle does a force of 10 m/s² down" means anything.
First off m/s² is not a unit one can measure force in.
But even "a circles does a force of 10 N down" would be nonsense.
yes i know
i havent slept and i feel like im stuck at progress because im working in 10% efficiency im sorry lmao
Are you sure you don't have an original statement you can show an actual photo/screenshot/scan of?
uhh let me think of an example
No
What number makes these two forces identical
if I push on the wing
just ignore.. everything like drag and mass lmao
well the circle with no acceleration doesnt change its position basically? and initially their centres are at a distance of 5
then you wanna calculate the angular velocity if i understood what you mean
None
Dont think of the rotational velocity in the roll axis though
what is the "roll axis"
oh do you mean as in the plane is rotating about its centre or some shit?
No, I mean everything except that
Ok im sorry im gonna go sleep and fix this when im awake
Before you spend to many words on saying what not to think about, you first need to explain in an understandable way what it is we should think about.
well idk what you mean but
tan(theta) = 5t^2/5 = t^2
where theta is the angle made by the initial 5 meters with lines joining the final position of the moving body and the stationary circle
you could differentiate this to get the angular velocity
i got the 5t^2 from the second equation of motion
ie s = ut + 1/2 at^2
The answer is the center of the sphere, Q and the concentric spheres with center Q, right?
yes
Could anybody help me out?
it reflected over the y acis
axis
meaning that it goes to the left of the y axis now
and it must be the same distance from rhe x and y axises as it originally was
do you still need help?
yes please
I think c
yea (2, 4)
left ?
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
thank you
sorry I am unfamiliar with this format "r(90, O)"
a rotation of 90 degrees around the origin
there's many things to explain
Does a composite transformation have to be 2 different types of transformations?
you could explain that reflecting a point (a,b) along the y axis will result in (-a,b)
No
I couldnt solve this and i looked at the answers and there was no steps
how do u do it?
my teacher is tweaking then
Hold on
I’ll show you my answer
in the comments she says that a composite transformation need to be two different transformations. Not 2 of the same type
really weird
notational issue?
issues in definition thne ig
no
damn it
you didn't transform it to (-4,7) at the end result
how do i do that again?
All sides are equal. And you can deduce the interior angles. Split it into triangles and rectangles.
reflect it again
yeah across the y-axis
Kk
so it'll be (-4,7)
the last line should be (4,7) over the y-axis to obtain (-4,7)
yea
real
you're translating it to (4,7), reflect it two times to get the same thing
yes
aight ty
your teacher should be fine with this
Since it's not specified, one of the transformations could be the identity
At least I would have used it, after translating
That would be technically correct and "objectively" the best way.
ma bad right
i cant distinguish left from right if my life depended on it
Fr
dyslexia?
the rigid body is going 10m/s at around -120 degrees
You keep not explaining what the heck that means.
What does it mean to "push down on someting" with a "force" measured in units of acceleration?
Which other forces act on your object?
Is it in free fall?
Only these
Perhaps it does not matter to you that you're asking a question that does not make any sense, but then you should not expect any answer.
I want to know how the vector of the body's velocity changes depending on the distance of the force from its center
Do you draw the velocity vectors from the center of the object?
Yes
Then it gets longer with higher velocity and shorter with slower velocity
It's pointing at the position where the object will be in the next "blink of an eye"
that could be a second, or a year whatever unit you use for time
Then you need to explain a whole lot more about what your situation is. At the moment you insist on giving just that one data point and refusing point blank to give any other information other than the nonsensical statement that there's some "force" that has units of acceleration.
You can totally measure force in units of acceleration if you assume mass =1, I already said this
You're still actively refusing to explain what the heck is up with your situation.
that point sin same direction and is (original vectors length)² or something
² = acceleration factor
Each of the numerous requests for you to clarify the situation has been answered with you repeating the nonsensical question without adding any of the explanation that was asked for.
A body is made of several parts, if I wanted to do a force on one of those parts, how would the net angular velocity of the body change depending on this part's position
idk what exactly is going on but I know speed(t) = acceleration * t
How are the parts connected?
That was repetition number about 42 of the question you have been asked to clarify.
If the connection is rigid, you can connect all mid points of the body parts and in the middle of all these connecting lines find a mutual middle point
If the connection is flexible or elastic it gets harder
Yes its rigid
Then you want to look into "center of mass"
What do you mean by this?
When you are asked to clarify what it is you're asking do not just repeat the same question that you have been told does not have enough information.
Wait a minute someone useful is answering my question
Gotta ninja into the weird thoughts that are hard to describe as a math guy
Tzaot is also asking you for clarification.
yeah but I do it without blaming on my own lack of understanding, the way I do it is add to where I know something and see if it helps.
I'm ready to be told its useless so I don'Ät need a perfect picture to start trying stuff
You helped a bit with this
and that, in the end, is all I can hope for todelo
In mathematics and physics, the centroid, also known as geometric center or center of figure, of a plane figure or solid figure is the arithmetic mean position of all the points in the surface of the figure. The same definition extends to any object in
n
{\displaystyle n}
-dimensional Euclidean space.
I...
The "edges" of this triangle become individual shapes centroid
There is something I don't know:
The starting points of these vectors with individual speeds are not ON the center of mass
so there could be a missing step in my solution
PS: Don't call people who try to help you not-useful
Trying at all is a comendable attempt
convey hard to phrase things as sketch or something idk, don't make ppl loose patience
They werent
They were just making snarky remarks at the fact that I couldn't convey my question correctly
Its the sort of inflated ego behaviour youd expect at this server
Youd be surprised, this helped me tons in a bit of a different way already.
👍
thanks
Np!
Hello
The area of right square is 8 cm^2
There are 3 squares
The orange triangle is equilateral
We need to find the area of the pink square with question mark
I'am completely lost
I think the diagonal of pink square is the side of the orange triangle, so if we find the side of triangle we can find the side of the square
is the equilateral triangle's side length the same as that of the square?
or can we not assume that here?
It's not said they are equal
hmm aight
I think we can prove it using this triangle that seems to be osoceles
looks like you might need some sort of trig
.
Yeah man i proved it, look...
in that case it seems the answer would be ||4||
Sorry for terrible picture
That 30° part is 90 - 60 = 30°. And left top angle in the isoceles triangle is 90 - 15°. The other angle 75° too
i'd be hesitant to call that a "proof" but in this case it does work out lol
if we're under the assumption that the equil triangle and big square have equal side lengths
Why isn't it proof that the side of equilateral triangle's side equals the square's side. No offense, i am just curious
you're assuming what you're trying to prove
which is circular reasoning
"suppose X, therefore X"
So is it proof when we don't now exactly if a statement is true or not, so we need to prove it right?
if we move the leftmost point around we can get stuff like this
i would call this more of a "by inspection"/"guess" that happens to turn out right
Okay
By the way this geometry problem seems interesting to me
this was a pretty cool problem yea thanks for sharing
well a challenge for those who want it, try to find tan(21degrees) ||consider tan(37degrees)= 3/4||
I got 6 too
thanks for confirming the answer
👍
at #43 is my solution correct?
angle FOA is congruent to angle FOB
angle FOB is supplementary to angle BOC
therefore
angle FOA and angle BOC is supplementary
or Am I wrong?
No, this reasoning is not correct
BFO and AFO are not necessarily congruent
what is true however is that AOF and AOE are congruent
because AF = AE (tangents to a circle from the same point are equal) and AO is common, and OF = OE as they are both radii, so you have SSS congruence
(RHS congruence is of course possible, or SAS etc)
so you have three pairs of congruent triangles in total, just like AFO and AEO
this should allow you to see how if you label all 6 angles around point O
well a good proof will be
||AOF = 90 - A/2, BOD = 90-B/2, COD = 90-C/2 its pretty straightforward from there||
RHS you mean Right Triangle-Hypotenuse-Side?
yes
i got these because O is the incentre which is the meeting point of angle bisectors and by the fact that radii are perpendicular to tangents
I'm in my fifth year in engineering and still I am really weak at basic geometry...
geometry is a different skillset you know
Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines and Mechanisms have a lot of geometry, I really need to master the basics.
wait are you still in high school or something?
Right now I discovered the angle measurements of angles inside, on, and outside the circle.
Anyone has some sort of quesiton for grade 9
I am in college I stopped recently from enrolling because my basic math foundation is really bad. I learned calculus and differential equations but I want to fill the gaps missing.
trig too?
this is my 3rd book I am completing on geometry
find tan(21 degrees) ||consider tan(37 degrees) = 3/4||
Pie is eternal
the first two was from
Moise, Geometry
Kern and Bland, Solid Mensuration
you mean approximate tan(21 deg)
tan(37 deg) is not exactly 3/4
😭 yea thats why i said consider it to be
hmmmm
is the circumcentre of a right angled triangle always the midpoint of the hypotenuse?
yea
it comes from the fact that the midpoint of the hypotenuse has the same distance to all 3 point by Thales' theorem
you should specify
not that bad
i dont have one rn but i know that you should always draw the circumcircle when given a triangle problem
idk how to use the circle though
lemme try
Yup
https://socratic.org/questions/how-do-you-evaluate-sin-pi-7-sin-2pi-7-sin-3pi-7 - this one goes on for way too long
yeah
what theorems should i learn to solve geometry problems for bmo questions?
Papers & Solutions You can use UKMT competition papers, solutions and investigations as preparation for maths challenges. Find and download free competition papers by selecting the Challenge type on this page, or click ‘Buy older competition papers’ to purchase from our shop. Buy older competition papers You can find our video solutions playli...
these types of difficulty
Thanks I get it now!
thanks too
npnp
Hey u guys got any reccomendations for dynamic math software? For algebra and functions and such. I currently use geogebra and hate it sm
what u utilise them for?
what does this mean
x and y arent equal to a
yes
they have different coordinates
k thanks
Solving equations, plotting functions etc
can't u do the first part yourself
that goes for everything
Hello
I need to find the length of the tangent line
I have no idea what to begin with
consider the radii of the circles that touch the line
13
do you know why the answer's 13
It is the sum of radius 5 and radius 8
But i don't know why the tangent line also equals 13
Cyclic quads, alternate segment theorem, isosceles triangles, inscribed angle theorem, angle sum of triangle, similar triangles, area formulae, parallel lines, trigonometry. Thinking of it as "learning theorems to solve problems" is wrong though, there aren't really that many theorems and it's mostly about recognising stuff and being creative rather than having memorized every theorem.
If you read the first chapter of the book Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads then you probably know enough to solve 90%+ of BMO1 geo
thanks so much
do u think this book covers everything u need for bmo?
yeah it's written to cover it
https://archive.ukmt.org.uk/docs/BMO Preparation Sheet.pdf also try reading this
k nice
Can anyone help me with it pls?
Hey can anyone suggest a video from which I can study trigonometry (grade 11)
These r the formulas I am studying this year
This looks scary
I mean, the amount of formulas needed to be remembered
most of them follow from cosine and sine angle addition formulae
there is honestly no reason to memorize all of those
Where I live these should be on ur finger tips otherwise you will lose all the marks in trigonometry
if the square of one lenght of a triangle equal to the sum of the squares of the othwr two is the triangle always right angled?
the triangle is a right triangle with the angle opposite the first sides as right angle
what country?
India
sounds plausible
It is
k
What quadrilaterals have diagonals of same length?
Rectangle and square
Isosceles trapeziums too
In Euclidean geometry, an equidiagonal quadrilateral is a convex quadrilateral whose two diagonals have equal length. Equidiagonal quadrilaterals were important in ancient Indian mathematics, where quadrilaterals were classified first according to whether they were equidiagonal and then into more specialized types.
do the diagonals intersect at 90 degrees?
Yup
100 percent sure
Just prove the triangles congruent and check it
For any 4s polygon
Bro wtf
Only square and rectangle
Bro is iso trapezium has diagnols equal how u ginna prove that respective triangles are congruent
In square yes but not in recti
I cna give u chart
Of every property of quadrilaterals
100percent sure if it has equal diagonals the diagonals intersect at 90 degrees?
isosceles trapezium also has equal diagonals
Prove it then
Using congruency
Isosceles have equal diagnols but not normal trapezium
I would rectify my mistake
yes
Let ABCD be the isosceles trapezium and let E be the intersection of the diagonals. All isoscles trapeziums are cyclic, so ABE is congruent to DEC. It is similarly easy to show that ADE is isosceles and the result follows.
Hello everyone
I have a question
Consider a rectangle ABCD with sides AB = 4 and BC = 3. A point P is randomly chosen within this rectangle. What is the probability that triangles APB and BPD, if they exist, have an area less than or equal to 2 at the same time?
yw
Almost there. Here it says the correct answer is 2/9. I don't get it
Maybe the template is wrong
How did you do it?
heres how i did it
if P is 1 or less from AB then APB has area less than or equal to 2
if P is 4/3 or less from AD then APD then APD has area less than or equal to 2
the area of the points where P can be is 4/3*1 which is 1/9 of the area of ABCD
you read the question wrong actually. the triangles are APB and BPD
Oh lol
brother
use pythogoras
to find y
1.6 square + 10.2 square
is y square
then with the value found for y
do 1.6 square + x square is = 1.6 square
to find x
then do 0.5 times 1.6 times 10.2
plus 0.5 times 1.6 times 3.4
add both for area
times 22$
Y IS 10.342
x is 3
sorry im not good at math, is this a or b?
how to do b?
is this b?
ye
go it thanks @vernal nexus
np
is 6 - 205.37 and 7 is 3.57m
cant see it
no one can read that bruh
How'd u get ur answers
can someone tell me if i get full credit for dis proof
cuz like answer key is showing diffrent method but idk if im right
I think it would work
yo quick question im confused on the formula for period is it 2pie/b for sin and cosine and pie/2 for tan grapths
yoo mq
Is that right?
it's RP
Is this RQ
PS
Can anybody tell me what is meant by that sign
Ya it means parallel line to that
because a line extends infinitely in both directions then if the points are on the same line they will extend infinitely in the same direction
Ah ok
bad explanation but whatever
Thank you for your help
yes
the arrow above means its a line in this case
Ohh thanks bro
np
Can someone please explain what exactly this theorem means?
I don't get what it means
It's not possible to read all of it
"If a line segment joining two points, subtends eqial angles at two other points lying on the same side of the line then these, the four points lie on a circle (i.e. they are concyclic)."
this is such a bad formulation
If ABCD are four points such that <BAC=<BDC then ABCD is cyclic
ohk that makes a lot more sense
(given that B,C lie on the same side of AD)
np
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
for some reason i'm enjoying geo a lot
i mean i'm rushing through the course that i'm doing
but i'm enjoying it
gotta get transcript as soon as possible
then i'll learn the material in depth
i'm basically just skimming material then i'm finna learn everything
(specially proofs)
cause they're too many
if you want to work through more proofs
may i suggest combinatorics 😃
geometry class "proofs" usually are of the "let's prove this blatantly obvious conclusion" flavor, which isn't always the case in general
I must be missing something trivial, but how should I get this formula?
Directipn of x* is the same as that of x
Yeah
And its magnitude = a²/|x|
But why
From |x||x*| = a²
Yeah that’s what I don’t understand lol
Why this is true
|x|=|x*|= radius
this is clearly false
the text explicitly says |x|<radius
i'm pretty sure it's a definition
as in the reflected point is defined to fulfill those conditions
but i've never heard of this terminology before so idk
I don’t think so? The “reflected” just mean it’s the same distance to the sphere as the original point
Oh sorry
I forgot to say
Oh shit
It is a sphere
"the reflected point is defined by two properties. [...] Its distance from the origin is determined by the formula |x||x*|=a^2."
Thats just the definition
I read it as the two properties defining this point are
- it is collinear with the origin and x
- it fulfills that formula
Oh, shit
I’m stupid😭
Thanks folks
I keep thinking this is some geometric property that I forgot
Is this 72?
,w 2x+5+x+1 = 90
,calc 2 * 28 + 5
Result:
61
yep
yeah so they add to 90, correct
Yea
but then angle ABC is 2x + 5
yes exactly
ah ok
i see
oh so would this be 60
solve for x and I get 31
Then i plug it back in
to 2x - 2
and get 60
yep
there's actually an easier way, because 4x - 4 = 2(2x - 2)
so you have 2(2x - 2) + 2x - 2 = 180
3(2x - 2) = 180
so 2x - 2 = 60 directly
Also could someone explain this?
so you know that LON is a right angle
because the diagram says thaat LOK is a right angle
so LOK + LON = 180, 90 + LON = 180
that's why you can do 90 - 60 = 30
How do I even do this?
you don't. give up.
nah jk they're the same angle xD
because the lines are parallel you know that those angles are the same, so you can set them equal and solve for x
uhh what does parallel mean again
90 or 180 degrees
i forgor
parallel lines will never intersect
they go in the same direction/have the same slope
yes
like the lines with the arrows
the red arrows
are parallel
thats what the red arrows mean
Alr
Yeah the two horizontal lines are parallel
Do I just set them equal to each other again?
yes
yes
guessing i just do the same here
yes the two angles are equal to each other. the answer is 8
Wow this is a piece of cake now
What’s one red arrow mean?
Perpendicular?
it still means parallel
parallel lines are where the lines will never cross each other, perpendicular is when they intersect at a 90 degree angle
the + sign is created by two lines perpendicular from each other
the = sign is two lines parallel to each other
Ohh
just as an example
not quite
oh
you would get... nothing
yep
idk why i was thinking 10 x 17 was 1700 for a sec
😂
sometimes if you multiply 2 two digit numbers you get a 4 digit number so ig i can see :l
they are actually the same angle
i'm not good at explaining why and i can't draw :l
but do you see how the ? angle is acute (less than 90 degrees) so it couldn't be 96 or 106?
yeah i can see that
also how do i tell if a line is parallel again?
Nvm
I can scroll up
for the first one, draw/envision a line segment IA that makes a triangle IJA
with the last 2
wdym
...yes
How would I get to doing that?
for which one?
Any one
cause I could use that to help me with the other
Both problems seem relatively similar
dude its so tiny lol
Yeah
yea
Yes
yeah
yep
yeah
actually that doesnt apply for the first one i think, i read it wrong the first time
tiny 😭
no prob man i just have tiny screen XD
yes I do
dang i was pretty far off
like if you follow from A to J to K, the angle is at J on that side
ah ok
i wish i could draw 😔
anyway
angle AJK and angle IJA make up angle IJK
so AJK + IJA = IJK
AJK = 56, IJK = 140, IJA is what ur tryna find
yeh
could someone go over my proof
yeah its good
Thanks
Can somone help me my assessment
Where would the shift button be on this calculator
my old one got lost so I don't have my casio and I have an exam tommorow 😭
“2nd”
2nd F?
probably
i have not used a calcultaor in the last 5 years
ahem our ed system doesnt involve the tan(42 degrees)
AP calculus more like AP calculator use amirite 😁
it does
Can someone help with a geometry question?
Which type of questions ⁉️
I can't cut it out so I have no other way (that I know of) to solve this
No?
How can i prove that the triangle FXE is an isosceles triangle
They expect you to use a calculator then
Tho 42 is not a good example
As i had someone~~ calculate~~ approximate it here yesterday xS but yea
Geometrically prove that sin(180+x) and sin(90+x) are -sinx and cosx respectively
Guys pls help me Ik how to do it algebraic way but idk geometrically
Unit circle
Ydk the unit circle definition?
pls head to #help-22
hmm, ill send example
what should i do if i legit understand like half of the concepts of geometry and i have a regents in two days
must be 84 since you know that the overall angle is 140 degrees
so you know how IJA+AJK is equal to the over all angle which would be IJK
so you can do the opposite
if you know ajk is= to 56 an ijk is equal to 140
you can use IJA=IJK-AJK
which is the subtraction property of equality i think?
then you can use substitution with IJK-AJK
basically 140-56
which gives u 84
(sorry if i did it wrong ppl i'm barely starting geo but those r my thoughts)
ngl i thought that was a transverso i would have said 5 is congruent to 8 because they look like alternate exterior angles
again sorry if it is wrong
but yes i think transitive property can work since you already proved the other angles to be congruent