#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 61 of 1
Oh nice
The volume of a cube is 216 in squared find the length of an edge of the cube and the surface area of the cube
you need help or ?
Some guy answered it in chat
Idk how he did it so fast though
the formula for a volume of a cube is x^3, where x is the length of the edge
so x^3 = 216, x = cbrt(216), which is the length of the edge
and then you just square the length and multiply by 6 to get the surface area
@trail tendon
should be 2 times the SA of all the visible sides as well as the SA of the bottom rectangle
you must've counted the bottom rectangle twice
also you calculated the area of the triangle wrong
I need assistance with geometry
Someone who can help me with a free time for study for my exam?
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
what’s it on?
Hey yo
Let $ABC$ be an acute triangle with altitude $AD, BE, CF$, orthocenter $H$. Let $P$ be the orthogonal projection of $D$ on $EF$. Prove that $PD$ is the internal bisector of $\widehat{BPC}$.
south
if you haven't learned this yet you should ask for a more specific kind of question
Is the last line to the solution "hence proved"?
no
what the flip
give a
gr 10 problem

i’m on no sleep
Hey does anyone now to find an angle (0, 360) between 2 vectors?
here you go
that’s just something from a test i get
gimme sometjignharder
like
lemme give an example
yes, try using the cosine rule
question 26
it does give anything over 180 tho
gimme something along that difficulty

If you want the reflex angle, just do 360 - your angle
The CEMC has become Canada's largest and most recognized outreach organization for promoting and creating activities and materials in mathematics and computer science.
you can try looking for a geometry question in there
NOOOO CANCERRRR
I ALWAYS
SCREW UP
ON THE CONTESTS

Kvkejdjcjjdnfhfhff
i’m gonna jump bye guys
but like in this example how can i differentiate between AC and AD?
it'll just give me the same angle no for AC and AD
45 degrees is the angle between AB and AC
45 degrees is also the angle between AD and AB
So if you want the reflex angle, you need to do 360 - 45 = 315
but i what if i always want the clockwise angle no matter if it's reflex or not
you should draw it out like you did on Geogebra but you could also try on paper
so that you can figure whether you need to do 360 - x or not
it's okay i found the solution
thank you tho
no worries
Can anyone help me how to find the area in colored part
is that supposed to be a circular arc
if not then i don't think there's enough information
Rly
bc the answer is gonna be
[area of trapezoid] minus [area of that circular/elliptical/??? region]
for both of those you need to know the height of the trapezoid
Idk the question just says find the area In the colored part
Yea
so maybe we can just assume it's a circle hmm
ok so in that case
what's the height of the trapezoid?
It’s not given
if we assume the non shaded region is a semicircle
then we know what the height is
what is it equal to?
(don't overthink it)
||the radius of the semicircle, 7||
So the radius is the height
that should be enough info to solve the problem
K Tnx
^
np
Can you find the area one of the two parts?
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
oh fair
Isn’t area of the full circle is pi*r^2
exactly
if the height of the trapezoid is h, the area is
trapezoid area - half-ellipse area
((20 + 7) * h)/2 - 7 * h * pi / 2
(27 h - 7 h pi)/2
what might this be? 
certainly, it doesn't belong to this channel 
is this just a list of topics in math?
what do you want to do with that?
i have the EVAU test on wednesday next week and im struggling to understand analytical geometry on space anyone who can give me a hand ?
It cannot be negative?
ok thanks
having trouble with compass bearings trigonometry is starting to get to me 😭
Have you drawn a diagram?
You're not supposed to keep that kind of situation in your head.
is the distance formula needed to solve for this question?
No.
You can wither write down equations for each of the diagonals, and solve to find their intersections.
Or: since you're being promised that it's a parallelogram, you can use that the diagonals in a parallelogram cross each other exactly halfway through each diagonal.
Can anyone help me to find the blue area
I already found the blue area plus the small circle inside of it
I don't know how to find the area of the small circle
Figure out its radius first.
Yes.
Can you give me a hint
To be honest i dont know what to do next
Moreover, i dont understand why this triangle is 45°-45°-90°
I hoped it would be obvious that the line that connects the centers of the two circles points towards the corner of the square and must therefore be at an angle of 45°.
I understand it now
So the next step is to write down an equation that the radius of the small circle must satisfy.
The step after that will be solving that equation.
I've no idea.
That equation looks reasonable. If it gives you 0.86, then go with that.
Okay, thanks
Thank you a lot
I solved the whole question correctly and found blue area
For my test I gotta know these graphs, do I have to learn them or is there a way during the test I can make these?
Do I just have to learn what a cot,cosec and sec graph look like
<@&268886789983436800>
pretty much u just gotta know what thye look like...
My bad i didn’t know it was gonna be so big it was an emoji on my keyboard
Damn the cot,cosec and sec ones so complicated:(
if you know what the sin, cos graphs look like then it follows from that
a.k.a it flips, but also since a function cannot have multiple y values for one x value it has a range restriction
depending on which graph
🧐
ignore what i said i was thinking of inverse trig functions
💀
these dont flip nvm
Can someone help me with this?
Am I suppose to find each midpoint of each of the lines that can be formed
Because I end up getting decimals which i cant graph
They only let me graph whole numbers
I gotta graph 2 triangles
hint: using the midpoints, you can find the vertices of the original triangle - set up some equations to solve for their coordinates
what should I learn of Algebra, so I can move on to trig?
don’t see it as a means to an end, learn it thoroughly
at a bare bare minimum, you should be comfortable with solving linear and quadratic equations in one variable, and working with exponents and stuff
cuz after trig and maybe even during trig theres still algebra ._.
especially after ._.
One thing I can think of is the coordinate plane maybe. I think the unit circle relies on that.
I am so sorry. I mean what can I learn of Geometry not Algebra LOL.
Basically I know nothing about geometry other than the basic shapes. Absolutely nothing. Right now I'm re(learning) basic arithmetic, then I'll move on to Algebra 1 and 2, and will have to move on to Trigonometry. However, geometry is missing along the way and I don't know what can I teach myself
@trail tendon @gentle haven
Coordinate plane is mega important. I definitely do not remember if X and Y is up horizontal or vertical so thats a must
Anything else?
x is horizontal, y is vertical
uhh
right i know that but i gotta remember that
but ill prob remember after your reply
for geometry i would learn angle manipulations and maybe areas of 2d shapes
Things related to triangles maybe
oh yeh definitely
Right thats super important
what other theorems?
angles, areas of 2d shapes including triangles
Sas, asa, aas
what else?
what
how strong does ur geometry have to be to learn trig, and to learn calc?
well im learning calc, and i know trig, and my geometry is mid
lol
Congruence theorems
i mean i've seen all of that throughout my schooling but unfortunately i never studied :/
so having outstanding algebra skills is better than having outstanding geometry skills?
idk
definitely
got it
right
i would know like formulas to calculate circle, triangle, trapezoid
I think there's more alg than geometry in trig
rectangles ofc
Apart from triangles and circles
i would actually argue the opposite?
How so
those r the shapes u see the most in calc?
or calc has no specific shape
i mean at least the trig functions are based on triangles from the unit circle
😭
Yeah but apart from that what else geometry is there
in calc, you might use these to calculate harder shapes, more or less. also, you get to derive the formula for area of circle 💀
kind of 💀
what algebra is there?
interesting
i mean
i guess the trig identities technically
but the basic ideas of trig functions are more graphs and unit circle
and angles
so
Area perimeter and volume of 2D shape
Area perimeter and volume of triangles
Pytagorean theorem
SAS, ASA, AAS (Congruence theorems)
formulas to calculate circle, triangle, trapezoid, rectangles
all of those r part of geometry?
or trig
you can't have volume of 2d shape, but yea
in trig? where?
Variables
i guess 💀
r 3d shapes trig or geometry?
Sin cos, etc. those are ratios right
geometry
Tangent gives a slope
tan
Shocking
thats not algebra, thats...division...
i mean idk if variables are only algebra, and everything with a variable is algebra
lol
i dont know how its classified
Algebra deals primarily with variables right
yess
Sinx=o/h
I feel like that would be algebra
Yeah
sort of yea
you're so right
It's always been algebra
calc 1 is just algebra 3, lets be honest
Fr
calc 2 is algebra 4 🗿
I suppose so
and so on and so forth
calc 3 is maybe geometry 2 😂
HAHAHAHA
Geometry is algebra 1.5
@trail tendon which calc r u learning rn
2
i havent gotten that far, but i wouldnt say its too much harder 💀
yet, at least
💀
lets say i take calc 1 in the fall of some random semester, and then i have a 1 month break to spring semester
and spring semester is calc 2
can i self study a bit
of calc 2
so i get an A
?
or is it super hard and barely anyone gets an A
oh u probably could get an A
its not that much harder than calc 1
if you got an A in calc 1, u can prolly get an A in calc 2
at least, i hope 💀
its hard if you look at it without context and have no idea whats going on, i guess 💀
it may depend on the teacher, the teacher could give really hard problems
mine didnt
i hope not
💀
@trail tendon if i study a lot these 2 chapters before my fall semester where i'll learn precalc 1 do u think ill be prepared
although they wont use this book, they'll cover chapters 1-4
so ideally i'd learn the first 2 chapters
those are really important, it may not be all you need to know but i can't really think of anything else off the top of my head so that would be great to study that, you'd be in a good place at least 😂
ye def not all they cover more
exactly thats my goal thanks
Converting polar coord. to rect. coord.
Hi, can anyone help me out here? Idk what did i do wrong, i already make sure i use in radian, but still getting the slightly different answer from the video.(-4.75,-3.67) Did i miss anything, or did the lecturer make a mistake there?
(sry i sent wrong pic)
,calc 6cos(3.8 rad)
Result:
-4.7458062714865
,calc 6sin(3.8 rad)
Result:
-3.6711473456563
@trail tendon @gentle haven thank you so much you guys are awesome. Lots of love from Mars
dude you live on mars???
i got the same thing he got, idk how u got that
did you use degrees but put the answer in radians?
^ i use radian mode then typed 6cos(3.8)
hence this answer
can you show me how u doen it with teXit
i dont know texit
also uh
6cos(3.8 rad)?
it should be -3.1cos(182 deg) or -3.1cos(3.17 rad) if you really want to round
thats werid, i converted it to degree and it does give the correct answer
but idk where i did wrong with rad
Result:
2.4519999069347
they're converting polar to rectangular... for teaching purposes 😂
it should be more like 3.17 rad, not 3.8 rad
cant we just plug them in the formula, x=r* scos theta and y=r* sin theta
thats from rectangular to polar
actually no
its from polar to rectangular
mb
lol
i think my problem here is understand why cant i just plug in 3.8 rad, and where did 3.17rad come from.. From previous example, ive only been plugging in only, i dont really need to worry about converting..
Result:
3.1764992386297
Mhm
You need to convert to radians first
Then you can just plug in
but isnt 3.8 rad. in radian already?
Where do you get 3.8 from in the first place?
It's not anywhere in the picture you posted.
Ah 2 different questions got it
Huh, that looks completely different from what you posted first.
oh lol, mb i think i sent the wrong pic
should be this
My calculator agrees with yours.
Any particular reason not to think the person in the image made a mistake?
hmm, i guess they made an error? I did see comment about people getting the different answer, but no one is knowledgable enoough to be able to confirm it
How to use trigonometric relationships to change Polar Coordinate represented points into Rectangular Coordinate represented points
Support: https://www.patreon.com/ProfessorLeonard
here is timestamp
Their angle seems to be right, but srqt(4.98²+3.85²) is 6.29 rather than 6.
The video simply jump-cuts to having wrong numbers on the whiteboard, no hint of how they came about.
prolly cuz he put it in a calculator, remembered the wrong number or smthn 💀
^
welp, so can we agree (-4.75,-3.67) is the correct answer?
Yes.
sorry about the confusion earlier btw, do you get the same answer like this?
yes
case close then. Thanks guys
don't know if this is the right place to ask but
i know you can project from $\mathbb{R}^n$ to $\mathbb{R}^m$ such that m < n (usually), but i want to know if there's a term for a specific kind of action from $\mathbb{R}^n$ to $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ where you have some shape and you "lift it up" to form a shape of the dimension one above
haru~
or less generally the action of taking a 2d shape and making a prism with it
My answer is 9 pegs, but the right one is 10 pegs
My solution is that the 4ft board = 48 inches
minus the ends which is 2*6 = 12 ; therefore 48 - 12 = 36
then 4 inch spacing per peg so 36/4 = 9
What did I do wrong is my picture wrong?
48
so we can add in one more peg
be careful of these “off by one” errors
they’re quite easy to make on questions like this
npnp
Hey. I was wondering if anybody could give me some suggestions for online resources that I could use to get started learning geometry
anything pre university is generally covered passably by khan academy
it’s not great, it just .. gets the job done
alr thx
try the book by moise and downs (Geometry, Metric Edition)
or
You can also try what am I reading now by Alexander (Elementary Geometry for College Students)
those look pretty interesting. thx!
https://youtu.be/qW6Ua50fTw8?t=399
over here how is he breaking the tangent into two diff angles??
Subscribe! http://www.freemathvideos.com Want more math video lessons? Visit my website to view all of my math videos organized by course, chapter and section. The purpose of posting my free video tutorials is to not only help students learn math but allow teachers the resources to flip their classrooms and allow more time for teaching within th...
observe that 15pi/6 is 12pi/6 + 3pi/6
and 12pi/6 has no effect on the angle because its just 2 pi, its just a full revolution around the circle
so 15pi/6 is the same angle as 3pi/6
which simplifies to pi/2
so he broke it up into 2pi and the remaining angle??
right?
can anyone help? im rly struggling i need all the help i can get and i havent found any
plz i REALLY need help i will fail if i dont get help
nothing has helped
this is my last hope and no one has answered my forum'
What do you need though
like theres various topics beause my teacher doesnt know how to teach
Like what
area of a regualr polygon thats one
which proof?
integral proof?
ya
can't you just do trig sub?
like uh
the equation of a line is y^2 + x^2 = r^2
obviously you can't integrate that with respect to x or y
k
but y = +- sqrt(r^2-x^2), right?
yeah
Oh damn, I’m taking this shit next year
and since the area of +sqrt(r^2-x^2) is the same as -sqrt(r^2-x^2), you can just integrate +sqrt(r^2-x^2) and multiply by 2?
this aint really geometry either lol
this is more calculus 💀
but it kind of
geometry relateed
yeah so far so good
alr and the bounds are -pi to pi, right?
because those are the ends of the circle?
yup it is
so now you have sqrt(r^2-x^2)
just realized
mb
i was taking unit circle
im gonna change the 1 to r^2 lol
kk
oh alr nice
here is the derivation of the formula for the area of a regular polygon
observe that any regular n-gon can be split up into n congruent isosceles triangles (5 triangles shown for the pentagon)
so we just need to find the area of 1 triangle and multiply by the number of sides
also, the sum of all exterior angles is 360 degrees
since this polygon is regular, one exterior angle (red angle) is 360/n degrees
that means 1 interior angle is 180 - 360/n degrees (blue angle)
so the angle of one of those triangles (green angle) is half of blue so (180 - 360/n)/2 = 90 - 180/n degrees
now, say the side length of this polygon is s
now we have that the purple length is s/2
and also, since tan(x) = opposite/adjacent, we have red length = tan(green angle) * purple length
or red length = tan(90 - 180/n) * s/2
red length is the height of one of those triangles, and the area of a triangle is bh/2
so the area of one of those triangles is (s * tan(90 - 180/n) * s/2) / 2
or s^2 tan(90 - 180/n) / 4
or s^2 cot(180/n) / 4
now we just multiply by the number of sides because there is 1 triangle per side
so we end up with:
area of whole regular polygon = n s^2 cot(180/n) / 4
I’m having some trouble with this problem, the books hint says to try and find the area of PXQ divided by the area of ABC, but since I don’t know anything about the altitude I’m trying to prove PXQ and UAR congruent but I’m finding myself unable to do so.
I’m not sure I’m going down the right path but I’m not sure how else to go about this
Wait no they can’t be congruent
they are similar, but (generally) not congruent
Hmmmm
I’m not sure how to find [PXQ]/[ABC] in terms of PQ and BC without knowing anything about the altitude
honestly idk what the hinted approach is, seems like you can do it without using any areas
My idea is to use area to find the scaling factor between triangles and then doing something with that
And that seems to be what the books hinted approach is
But I do not know how to actually do that
can you relate, say, RS/CA to some other ratios using similar triangles?
if you use RX/BC
and convert the other one to .../BC as well
all three denominators become BC
What other one
TU/AB
PQ/BC + RS/CA + TU/AB = PQ/BC + RX/BC + UX/BC
after that youre pretty close to the solution
So we need to show PQ+RX+UX = BC
Which I think we can do fairly easily
By just showing RX = QC and UX = BP
I’m not sure if that’s trivial or not
it is quite trivial
dont spam
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
@tropic flame please post your question before tagging/asking for help
Alr mb I'm new here
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
and do you need help on both 10 and 13
Yh
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1 buddy
for question 10, you first need to find the (horizontal) distance between lines AB and CD
which is equal to distance AD
Alr
do you know how to do it?
No
hmm
👨🏿🦲
Alr
Ooooooooooooooooooh yh I knew it
notice that BADE is a rectangle
Yep
so can you find the length of CE?
4
What
how did you get 4 💀
Bro I'm trash at geometry
answer my question how tf u got 4
I halfed 8
bruh
it's not given (and in this case not true) that E is the midpoint of CD
so dont assume that
💀
anyway
since ED = BA = 3cm, CE will be 8 - 3 = 5 cm
Oooh yep
ok so now apply pythag thm to find BE
Show me how u solve it in a pic and I'll get ikt
i dont think it makes any difference
do you actually know pythag thm
can you just state the theorem rn
No
if you know it you should at least be able to do that
Gimme a question and I'll do it
the question is right in front of you
BC = 13 cm, CE = 5 cm, and BEC is right angle, and you need to find BE
Ok
can you do that?
??
Is it wrong
yeah
👨🏿🦲👨🏿🦲
BC = 13 is the longest side, how you gonna have BE = 13 too
can I post my question here?
if its related to geometry or trigonometry then yes
U asked for BE
yes
BE=13
can you show your working
Nvm
?
what's your answer
Idk
so do you still need help
Nah its ok
Imma move on to trigonometry
Alr
Thankk
Thanks
💀 ok
@stray elbow did you have a question?
(If he does, he can't post it).
Evidence suggests it would probably have been 2+2.
How does theta equal that? THe formula I was given was tan0 = y/x, 0 = arctan y/x which equals -45
they ask for 0 < theta < 2pi
so it needs to be in radians, and in that particular range
Oh.. you're right, thank you
Actually I seemed to only be able to get that to work for one question
This is in radians, and within the range
Oh, nevermind it was +2pi'd
i think the opposite
the opposite what?
BD intersects AC at D i think its saying
point a or point d
take what?
projection lesson
its choose
how did you get it though
oh i thought you meant choice d
nahh
how did you get {D}
is it wrong?
i don't think so
I don't know exactly how you got it though
were you just guessing because its the point of intersection? 💀
oh wait
i dont know how to explain it
im dumb
since i take it in arabic
ahh
i also have another one but its about the same damn lesson but i dont know the answer
no actually i think it is {D} because both BD and AC intersect the point, so technically the line is just...rotated about the point {D}
i don't know for sure though
how did you get those?
in my book theres a rule that when they are parallel the projection equals the origin (bd) so bd =8 and so does its projection but when its a normal not parallel the origin is always bigger than the projection
unless they typed the question wrong cuz im losing my mind
if they mean its still parallel for the rest of the question it equals 8
what does // mean 💀
parallel
yeah thats what i said
im reading ur reasoning again hold on
i mean if projection means you map BD on AC
i would think the length of the "projection" would be 8
the same length as BD
unless im trippin
yeah u map it draw two points from both ends of bd so b and d on ac which is the straight line
so they r called b dash and d dash
B' and D'?
pretty sure its 8
yes
did ur teacher call them dash?
or r u self studying, or are they really called dash
lol
usually id think they were called prime
B prime -> B'
mebe not tho idk
weird
i need hella help
nice
shit should be easy but im secon guessing
geometry has been so easy til now for me
its just so weird
i need som1 ina call to help me stgggg
you know how to calculate the surface area?
and the whole pythagoran therom i think idk bruh
so would i do the box technique
lemme show
alr
yeah
so in order to calculate the area of the rectangle, you need that last side of the triangle
since it tells you its a right triangle, you can use the pythagorean theorem
so how do you apply that here
yes
and that the 25 appears to be from the right traingle being the hypotenuse
so whats b
7
yes
are you able to get the area of each side and add em all up for the surface area?
maybe
like total surface area
thats LSA + 2B
b is b x h
so 7 x 24 to find the b and then divide it by 2
so 168 would take 2b and then i would have to add the LSA
this is an example i found that uses pyth
but there are two bases with the same area, no?
aren't we talking about the triangles lol
so if 25 is the edge, would that be the constant number used for hte box
like the boxes for finding the surface area
im so confusing stg
3?
in total?
if we including those triangles then 5?
yeah
ok so 5
its so strange to me that you think of lateral surface area before total surface area 😂
this isn't always true
but whatever
good enough lol
lmao
can u possibly walk me throughon how to get the answer
cause tmrw on the quiz, theres one question for each shape, so if i know hat to do with these mfs, ill do fine on it
“lateral surface area” is just any part of the surface area that isn’t a base
yeah
huh
above, you have a right triangular prism - that is, the right triangle faces are the bases
ok so there are 3 LSA
by the way, i never really completely understood, how do you know if something is a "base"?
if it’s a prism
then that’s like taking a 2D shape and “stretching”/“extruding” it out into 3d
a cylinder for example
what if its not?
so could u walk em thru on how to get that
if I take a circle
and stretch it out
the other relevant case is pyramids/cones
where it should be quite obvious which face is the base
what's the area of the front side
yea
the one that doesn’t have the apex as one of its vertices
so 168?
yes
cause 2b is 2(84)=168
ok
so
what do i do to find teh LSA
or heres a better one, how should i do it in forms of those god damn boxes
find the area of all the sides and add them up
or multiplication
huh
the area of a rectangle is bh
oh 1 sec
is it because of the 8
like what does the 8 need to look like to do it
and connect to all 3
like wtfffff
and this vocab has me braindead
but why is the 8 the main # involved into the boxes
you may be having hard time the 3D
don't worry about that
its the height
you see the rectangle that has area 8 * 24?
thx for that pic
yeh 💀
you forgot to add the triangles i think
Nah that’s adding the utraingles
how should I learn geometry better? I can't wrap my head around it ngl
Me too
without a more specific question there's not much i can say without it being meaningless generality
sometimes alll someone wants is the meaningless generality tho fr
cool proof
my immature ass will laugh at the account name
What is trigonometry
well at the most basic level it relates the sides of a triangle
Generally functions that relate angle measures to ratios between lengths.
So, why do we need a raios of sides
and then whatever mess it becomes when you reach non euclidean shit
For example if you know one of the sides and want to know the other.
for this triangle if you are given QK = 2, how would you find PK? the answer is with trigonometry
(That's a somewhat bad example because for those particular angles you could also say "reflect the triangle across PQ, and that will give you an equilateral triangle").
Im confused, trigonometry represents a ratios of sides (i have there only angles)
You were also told the length of QK.
i mean it is the simplest one, for a 45-45-90 triangle it is easier cuz isoceless, then we reach 18-72 or 37-53 but those are just weird xD
yes
if your triangle has side lengths x, y, z for example
you can make each side k times larger, and it will still be similar (look the same but bigger/smaller)
So our new side lengths are kx, ky, kz
Check that (kx)/(ky) = x/y and so on, so the ratios between sides are the same
(isnt similarity taught before trig?)
it should be
hm yea
Hopefully this will be revising old stuff rather than teaching them new info
true
I do not understand what role play angles in that (are they sin,cos,tag
they just relate a particular ratio
for eg if your triangle has the angles 30-60-90
and you take one such triangle and measure the ratios
you can use all those ratios for all triangles with same angles
this is applicable to all other angle pairs too (must contain a right angle though)
(btw is helpful role only for those who help in the help channels or everywhere?)
try watching this vid https://youtu.be/PUB0TaZ7bhA?si=aKzdEz6_IYYQ1VZT
This math video tutorial provides a basic introduction into trigonometry. It covers trigonometric ratios such as sine, cosine, and tangent. It explains how to evaluate it using right triangle trigonometry and SOHCAHTOA. In addition, it explains how to solve the missing sides of triangles and how to find the missing angles using inverse trig f...
Hi guys I have a question that I will get from proofs and logic to here, which is if circle has zero sides or infinite sides?
can be in other places
like pre-uni, early uni, advanced doesn't give helping activity though
depends on what you mean by 'side'
it's an interesting question
depends
if not there then whats the other places 💀
don't think there are any other places
maybe help forum? ask the mods
hmm i guess ill wait for when one comes active
reminds me of the whole klein bottle thing, does that thing have zero volume orr infinite volume
I've asked in #『meta-discussion』
Ya so I got a grand disagreement from someone, I kept telling them it is based off how you define sides, but they kinda just went forth wall and defined circle as something that doesn't have Exterior angle...
They presented a proof for that as here ->
Intuitively let's define circular shapes like circles, ovals and such as an object with 0 external angles. Then :
Ea = 2pi/n
n -> inf
Therefore, Ea -> 0
I'm doing unecessary extra work here; either show what is wrong with my statement above or there's no problem with my assertion.
Now I got no clue how this answers or helps up with idea related to "sides" but
i do gladly define "side" as a line segment with 2 of its endpoints on 2 vertices.
Different compositions of these "sides" can make up different shapes Ig.
But I think I am going off the track pretty quickly..
So is that proof even right approach?
answered
I suppose this is the correct channel to ask the question.
Why are you hiding your definition behind spoiler markup?
With that definition it should be fairly obvious that there are no "sides" in a circle.
that really sucks that the goddamn help forum counts but these channels don't count
but the thing is normal discussion regarding the subject also happens here
soo there is no way to really differentiate is there
shit
fair enough but I think we should loosen the definition of helping a bit
like giving info about a subject also should count as helping
i mean maybe but like if you look at #calculus half of the times its just people ranting about how leibniz notation sucks soo i mean you wouldnt wanna give them the "help points" xD
Sorry mb marked it behind spoilers.
I actually had the definition which was pretty vague was accepted by the other end anyways.. which was "line segment == side." But I retracted that one back.
And yes, I definitely agree it should just make it zero sides by definition, so even if someone asks me to "prove it has zero sides" I could just say circle is by definition having zero sides / no sides, unless they want a different definition.
With that out of the way, I was confused if the later approach with external angles is conceivable. Cause it doesn't really talk about sides anymore.
Fixed the spoilers part, it's italics now.
Guys tell me if I am getting trolled or smth... the suspense is haunting.
]
how does it equal this?
It's not really a mathematical question.
In the commonly understood usage of the words, the word "side" only has a clear meaning for polygons, and a circle is not a polygon. Anyone who wants to even use it about a circle will need to provide a definition of what they mean; depending on which definition they pick they may end up with something that the circle has none of, or one of, or infinitely many of, or perhaps something in between. Choosing between the possible definitions is not something that mathematics as such has an answer for; it is up to whoever picks a definition to convince their listener that "side" is a reasonable word to use for whatever they're talking about.
a circle is just one curved line segment :>
💀
Alright man, glad to hear it's all about picking definitions and basically agreeing with specific definitions.
I appreciate your assessment.
Definition moment.
😂
wdym by "curved" ☝️🤓
Wittgenstein.....
Darüber muss man schweigen?
,calc 900/2
Result:
450
HELP-
Is 900/2 not being 300 not enough help?
i said help as in lol
help
<@&286206848099549185>
R u helper
What is the problem?
yep
Can u help me with hatd question perimeter
Sure. Where is it?
send it to what is it
No help me understand it
What do you need to understand?
can you say the topic in academic form
what is the problem
No
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Area and volume
yeah for sure shall we have it in voice ?
Yh
it would be easier
Alr
dont steal my name
This is a math channel.
Sure.
The results look right, at least.
With a bit of experience you can do the angle conversion faster than the step-by-step arithmetic you used here, by viewing the fraction of pi as a combination of pi/1 (=180°), pi/2 (=90°), pi/3 (=60°) and pi/4 (=45°).
thanks
i’ll prob just leave it like that because that’s how we did it in class
i have two more problems i might ask about after i just need to do them first
It is possible but not really doable by hand
Some computers graph it sure, others use what is called a "taylors series" to approximate the value
Well it is kind of complex to explain if you dont know the basics of calculus
But it is basically an infinite termed polynomial which is equal to a function
Well yea thats when you need calculus knowledge to understand the working
Im not aware of that tbh
Well do you know basic differentiation too?
Um the actual definition for the taylors series is based on differentiation so yea
He probably just approximated it by drawing the triangle but im not sure
I guess graphs werent a thing back then eithee
So triangle is the only real way
Or maybe just approximations
Like sin45 = 1/sqrt(2) we can write sin 45 solely in terms of sin1
Soo we can approximate sin 1 from there
And then calculate all other values
But it is gonna be tedious if not impossible to solve a 45 degree polynomial xD
dude i thought you meant 45 degrees 😂
i was like "bro its sqrt(2)/2, already calculated" 💀
Lmfaooooo
No wait
I did mean 45 degrees in there?
I am saying you can calcullate sin 1 degree from there
And calculate all other shit after that
using series decomposition?
What even is that 💀 like taylor's series right?
It is
yeah