#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 59 of 1
okay i cant figure this one out pls help
yeah but idk what to do with it
draw a horizontal line from A to the right until it meets BC
call that meeting point H
you have that ACH and ABH are both right triangles w/ a known acute angle and one of them also has a known side
which is the knwon acute angle? 14? how does that belong to one of the right triangles
wait is it 57 for ACH since you just made the triangle smaller but the angle of inclination is the same?
got it, tysm
what does same size independently mean
ive found the angle xby but idk what it wants me to prove
oh ok
Prove that angle XBY has the same size**,** independently of the other angles of the triangle.
they missed a comma that would have clarified things a lot here
Why is this wrong?
your handwriting is hard to read and your grammar isnt making it any easier.
what do we start with?
ok so you start with a rectangle ABCD and then you draw the line XY which is the perp bisector of AC
Then draw vertical lines from point f and e
did i get that right
Yes
im unable to follow your angle-chasing at all
Then we label the angles
but it's looking like triangles AXY and CXY will be isosceles... with XY as the base
Let bcx=a and fcx=b
Yes but idk where I went wrong
Why my method doesn’t work
Let bcx=a and fcx=b because of alternate angles I can label the rest of the angles
Yes
i concede that angles FXC and FCX are labeled correctly. but from where did you get that angles YXF and XYF are what you claim them to be?
Oh crap
Ok thanks I get where I went wrong
The diagram I draw made it look like the triangles are similar
it might also help if you organize your reasoning in something better than a wall of text and a giant run-on sentence.
try individual sentences each on their own line
and showing clearly what follows from what
and get a bigger notebook or smaller handwriting
Ok should I draw more diagrams
Ok
I’m having trouble with this especially since I can’t use a calculator on this test.
Just know that sin(30 degrees)=1/2.
You can always rederive it by drawing a 30-60-90 triangle.
THANKS
how do I dind the period of the graph?
Visually. How far is there between two points on the graph that are "the same" point but in different repetitions of the repeating shape?
2 1/5?
Looks closer to 2½ to me.
would that be the period?
Yes.
What? Why?
my teacher usually gives us the period and its usually pi or 2 pi
x=pi is all the way out here -- there's clearly more than a period between the y-axis and that.
oh
"Period" means the horizontal distance between corresponding points in neighboring repetitions.
ok, so 2 pi?
2pi is way wider than your graph even shows.
1/2pi?
How long is the red line segment in my last image?
5 cubes
And each grid line is how much, in numbers according to the axis?
1/2pi?
pi?
1/2
2 1/2?
Yes.
What do you mean by d?
thats an example
on #11, #12 or both?
It’s pretty much just use trig functions
for #12 drawing the triangles related to point D may be helpful
no
u can’t at this point
by chapter 6 u wouldn’t have done that yet
11d and 12 for me!
I'm unable to prove it😭
well the easy but painful way would be to just apply cos(a+b) = cosa*cosb-sinasinb
south
No thanks
done
oh really? congrats
I used this
substituted pi/3 value as 60..
and done!
great! it's honestly worth doing it yourself so that you fully understand how it works
wait till you hear about non euclidean geometry
there could be several different reasons why
I DON'T LOVE GEOMETRY
The only obstacle in my life
well gotta push through?
life is tough get a helmet
ngl like
did you just want to vent
or did you wanna get help w/ something concrete
Probably just wanted to vent
i would have redirected him to #chill or #discussion in that case.
hey can you give me please some limites whit trigonometry (sin, cos, tan)
Hello there I need help
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
abcd is the area of square right?
and is it given that the radius of inner circle equal to thhat of the other four?
It's not given anything the question just was ABCD square is 20m2 find the gray stuff how much it is
It's probably the same
Just count it as the same
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
well have you figured out the radius of any circle? ||hint :- sum of two diameters should equal the side length||
Now man I don't know nothing
well then i would suggest starting with easier problems
you know absolutely nothing?
Nope
if you take a square and enlarge its sides 2 times, how many times does its area grow?
your proff is just evil
do you know this?
Twice
are you sure?
doubling a circle's radius would not cause its area to grow 2 times either.
im trying to get an idea of how much you know some basics.
I know chemistry that's about it
cause i have an explanation lined up but if you truly know nothing as you say then it will be difficult
yea that def not gonna help with maths
when you double the sides of a square, its area grows by 4 times.
It's means it should a circle around 4,5x4,5
that problem is not so easy- it would be tough to understand the explanation then there is no point
and the other way, if you take a square with sides equal to half of the original, the area will be reduced to a quarter of what it was.
Can you just help me figure out how large is one circle in that box
I'll find the gray part somehow
Thank you you are doing a really good deed
those arcs in the corners
do we know that they are from circles of the same radius as the ones we see in full
cause if we don't then we are in trouble
Count it thesame
and the same in the other corners
it means the grey area is equal to the area of these two squares
which is clearly half of the total
damn that was elegant
So half of the box
10m2 p
And the other two part I'll give it around 3,5m2
?
Ohhhh I get it
Thank you very much
You those curvers
no
i erased all the curves with this argument
So it's 10m2
Is there any kind of theorem to solve for this? If so, is there any proof and does it apply to any triangles with 2 circles inscribed such as this?
A good technique when you're working w/ circles and tangents is to draw the segments from the centre to the tangent pts
that basically nukes this
Civil Service Pigeon
However, the bigger issue is with 2
you can't just introduce a division by 1/tan^2 A for no reason
in fact, you were basically done at 1
$-\frac{2}{\tan^2 A}=-2 \cdot \frac{1}{\tan^2 A}=-2 \left(\frac{1}{\tan A} \right)^2=-2 \cot^2 A$
Civil Service Pigeon
I'd think it's fine to jump from the -2/tan^2 A to -2cot^2 A immediately
but I listed out some (excessively granular) detail if you wish to see it
thanks for the help!

do i do the same for this one?
wdym by "same"
same process
ok, thx
Most often the LHS will be understood as meaning the arcsine.
which is why we have the special notation csc(x) = 1/sin(x) instead
real
i cant fricking memorize the circle geometry laws
real
wth even is that 🗿
same, sometimes XD
sure
this is horrible what is this 😭
I keep asking chatgpt, but it can't do math 🤷
GL!! 🫵😄
this is the kind of geometry that i have no idea how to do 💀
idk i haven’t tried anything yet
I got the answer if that helps? I just want to know HOW to solve it.
Got you.
im pretty sure this is high school geometry, but i can't even do it 😂
help 🙏🙏
this is like the hardest part probably
13 to 15 year old math "olympiad" in Sweden
thats kind of what i was thinking ngl
oh bruh
lmfao
yeah
13 year olds
this is one of those harder hard problems
😭😭🙏
Yess
i mean if they know how to do it then thats one thing
if you've never learned it thats another lol
i should be able to do it with what i’ve learned
simply can’t because i can’t see it

wdym?
can’t see solution
🗿
Both the circles are identical
when it says “what is the RADIUS” does it mean they have the same radius?
yes, they are identical
fuck me
wait the radius of both circles is identical?
yeah
bruh
gotta read more carefully
i guess i thought radius was plural of radius 💀
its like radii tho
or radiuses
not sure
and radiuses isn't a thing
radiuses is recognizable as plural but usually avoided in more formal writing
Ann do you feel like helping with the problem 😂
ah
i have not seen the problem
p
weh
yeh
Will "tangents from a common point are equal" help in any way ?
wdym common point
From the same point
It is marked in here
doubt
oh
wait
yeah probably
i thought u meant
nvm
i don't get what it means 😭
basically a point outside a circle
when u draw a line from the point
that is tangent to the circle
ok it’s easier to explain drawn
i know what a tangent is
i don't know what "tangents from a common point are equal" means
like the length of the tangent is equal? the slope?
breh
OHH
amazing diagram
wut grade level is the problem in
age 13-15 olympiad
ahh
alr
y’all
easiest solution
just search up
two circles inscribed in right triangle
easy 
hmmmm
i swear i was on to something
😭😭
let’s try now
what the fuck
this is a similar triangles problem
😭😭🙏🙏🙏
i ain’t doing trig at 2:30am
@winter mortar https://www.toppr.com/ask/question/in-the-figure-below-the-triangle-is-a-345-sides-triangle-two-equal-circle-are/
read this
i am too lazy to do this
Xd
Key point
^
i swear i could’ve gotten that

but not on a contest where you’re given like 5 minutes 💀💀
10 minutes 🤓☝️
Thank you!
Also why are they giving trigonometry to 13 yo’s 😭🙏
this is not trig.
there is nothing overly unusual about that, i was probably learning trig as early as 12-13 and there are plenty of other students who have done similarly
Bro what 😭🙏
this is just plain ol geometry
a very standard problem type in fact
whenever you see circles in a diagram
your first thought should be "draw in radii in convenient places"
I’m going to fail math 🤧
Does anyone has any ideas on how to get better at geometry apart from practice espcially the part that requires to draw unimaginable construcions?
you guys know any good books to self study trigonometry?
which problem have u seen that requires “unimaginable constructions”
Proof of sin(A+B) for one lmao
i dont think thats what he was talkin bout
Probably not but i was just commenting that shit constructions definitely exist
xD
i think he was talking about like drawing lines and stuff on geometric drawings to figure out the problem
Yea no i dont have one in mind rn but i have seen enough of those too... like any question from even AMC 10's ending problems require god level constructions
if you scroll up a bit theres one X'D
Lmaooo exactly my point
I hate how hard the AMC is especially 12
Were you talking bout this viper?
For people with no special training in competition maths
like you can do average but certainly you need to be trained to qualify for AIME
And then AIME is just pain
And in my country the equivalent stages are even harder
Soo am fucked lmao
India? or no
Yea-
ohhhhhhh
yes XD
It isnt even that bad acc to aime/amc standards ngl
Yea like sure i can manage enough to get done with it in school
But competition geometry is pain
exactly
Ahhhhh that's not bad if you think a bit
I hate how the number of maths enthusiasts in grade school means you need to be insanely good to stick out
i thought quite a bit, and its still bad 😂
i didnt read the answer thing but do u know how to do it
Yeah I know how to do the case with only one circle but....
no and I'll try to figure it out if I can
alr
Ig the same old area trick used for the single circle would work here too?
a much easier thing is cos(A-B) from which sin(A+B) follows
not so much
imo
Uh idk my textbook had the sin(A+B) first and both cosine ones were given as an exercise
spoilers to circle geometry:
||(x + c)/(r + c) = 5/4
x + c = 5/4 * (r + c)
x = 5r/4 + c/4
But also (x + r)/(r + c) = 3/4
x + r = 3/4 * (r + c)
x + r = 3/4 r + 3/4 c
x = -1/4 r + 3/4 c
So 5r/4 + c/4 = -r/4 + 3c/4
6r/4 = 2c/4
And c = 3r
So x = 5r/4 + 3r/4 = 2r
So x^2 + r^2 = (3 - a)^2
(2r)^2 + r^2 = (3 - (5 - 2r - 3r))^2||
For non visual thinkers like me it is at least, soo like when i have an idea i have to draw it out cuz i cant just picture an image of it in my brain if this even makes sense to you
X is the length of that red thing?
no, I should label x
and there's a sign error but oh well
do u have an example of a problem? Just wondering
XD i mean its the idea which matters anyways the silly stuff along the way is just boring computations
Damn that was cool
I messed up the signs and I'm now getting r = c??? anyways
Basicallly the smaller right triangle to the red side is similar
Not really
But just look past rmo papers the geometry problems in there tend to be hellish
Oh ok WA tells me ||r = c/3, x = 2c/3||
I swear I know how to do it it's just silly algebra
oh lol I know why
||the quadratic isn't nice but I think the solution is reasonable with the quad formula ||
@winter mortar
hope this helps
Ah wait did I make a wrong assumption
Don't think ||x^2 + r^2 = (3 - a)^2|| is correct sorry but the rest is right
I honestly think the way forward is:
||(3 - a - r)/(4 - c - r) = 3/4 which gives a = 2r and r = 5/7|| but that's super weird
It seems correct but there doesn't seem to be a proof
what did you get for sin(3t)
like when you solved for sin(3t)
T=10
no, like what did you get sin(3t) = ?
wait how did you get 10
oh
this might not be in degrees
Who can help me with my project?😭 Im badly needed someone help with trinometry cause the deadline is tomorrow
Trigo*
there are other times when sin(theta) = 1/2
also, are you sure they talking about degrees and not radians?
I need to answer the even no. questions
Its degrees
mk
I figured it out, thanks
👍
Like all of them?
@faint pasture no
Then?
No like as in all the even numbered ones?
Yes 😭
No ones gonna help with so many ques at once if am being honest
I answered 1-40 and my mind is so tired
@faint pasture even one question it will help me alot
Idk you can ask the ones you get stuck at, no one is gonna answer them all
We arent gonna give out the answer anyways if thats what you want i can help you reach the solution though
Okay, i wanna know how to solve it
Preparing for my exams
What are 43 and 44 asking?
(Hey what would be a good channel for dknight's problems? I dont wanna ruin geo and trig)
Can you help me with 46 and 48?
Well for 46 you just have to plug in the value
@dark sparrow yes
ok what's troubling you with 46
For 48, i assume you know about (a+b)(a-b) form
Yeah
(Ann i really dont think is the correct channel for his ques)
Well yea then expand the brackets and try to make it look similar to that form
idk
isn't this one fine
We dont have one for basic complex nums right?
Yeah thanks, iknow that already but i need to finish other but icant understand some problems
I guess even alg will be better how are these related to trig
Well just tell which problem you cant understand and we will help with that specific one
...
Thanks
Aight, thanks boss.
no worries
Saw a video that involved an equation for sin(5(theta)) which sparked my interest
Is there a general form/equation for Sin(n(theta))? Where n is a constant?
here are examples
and here is how to use them:
you can generate them by writing cos^n(x) as a fourier series using the exponential definition
then solving for cos(nx)
Damn there existed smthn like this all along?
But like it all seems random
I dont really see a pattern for generating it
like tan(nx) follows a pretty pattern
here is an example with cos^4(x)
cos(x) = (e^(ix) + e^(-ix))/2
so
cos^4(x) = (e^(ix) + e^(-ix))^4/16
= 1/16 (e^(4ix) + 4e^(3ix)e^(-ix) + 6e^(2ix)e^(-2ix) + 4e^(ix)e^(-3ix) + e^(-4ix))
= 1/16 (e^(4ix) + e^(-4ix) + 4e^(2ix) + 4e^(-2ix) + 6)
= 1/8 ((e^(4ix) + e^(-4ix))/2 + (4e^(2ix) + 4e^(-2ix))/2 + 6/2)
= 1/8 (cos(4x) + 4cos(2x) + 3)
now we have cos^4(x) = 1/8 (cos(4x) + 4cos(2x) + 3)
so cos(4x) = 8cos^4(x) - 4cos(2x) - 3
here, we know cos(2x) = 2cos^2(x) - 1 (if we dont, we can simply repeat our steps to find cos(2x))
so we have cos(4x) = 8cos^4(x) - 4(2cos^2(x) - 1) - 3
= 8cos^4(x) - 8cos^2(x) + 1
this is why T_4 (x) = 8x^4 - 8x^2 + 1
Sureee the result is interesting and there is a pattern but considering the recursion it can possibly involve for higher values of n, it is just not like doable
Were the polynomials invented this way too like by brute forcing btw if you know?
well cos^n(x) follows a pattern
its 1/2^(n-1) (cos(nx) + pascals triangle...../2)
And cos(2^n(x)) is still easy to calculate cuz cos(2x) =2cos²(x) -1
Shit like cos(17x) yea thatd be a mess
Dayum that sounds fun
Whats the patterns name so i can look it up?
hell if i know ¯_(ツ)_/¯
XD
but u can easily derive it using this method
Hmm true!
To think of it
There cant really exist such a polynomial pattern for sin right? Since sin(nx) is usually so intertwined with cosines
cos^1(x) = 1/1 (cos(x))
cos^2(x) = 1/2 (cos(2x) + 1)
cos^3(x) = 1/4 (cos(3x) + 3cos(x))
cos^4(x) = 1/8 (cos(4x) + 4cos(2x) + 3)
cos^5(x) = 1/16 (cos(5x) + 5cos(3x) + 10cos(x))
cos^6(x) = 1/32 (cos(6x) + 6cos(4x) + 15cos(2x) + 10)
cos^7(x) = 1/64 (cos(7x) + 7cos(5x) + 21cos(3x) + 35cos(x))
it all comes from pascal's triangle
sine is just shifted cosine
so i dont see why not
I mean sure you could just replace the x in cosine's pattern with pi/2 - x but thats kind of cheating
Oh wait
You couldnt
Nvm
(You kinda could but after it is all reduced to cos^n(x) form)
But that's kinda far xD
sin^2(x) = cos^2(x - pi/2) = 1/2 (cos(2(x - pi/2) + 1) = 1/2 (cos(2x - pi) + 1) = 1/2 (-cos(2x) + 1)
there u go
Um could you explain how? It doesnt look like anything like pascals triangle to me after the 3rd row
sin^3(x) = 1/4 (cos(3(x - pi/2)) + 3cos(x - pi/2))
= 1/4 (cos(3x - 3pi/2) + 3sin(x))
= 1/4 (-sin(3x) + 3sin(x))
u can just shift them and simplify
Damn that's cool
if odd power: take 5 as an example
2^(5 - 1) = 16
1/16 in front
row 5 in pascal's triangle is 1 5 10, these are the coefficients, reduce frequency by 2 each time
cos(5x) + 5cos(3x) + 10cos(x)
Ohhh iseee that makes sense
if even power: take 6 as an example
2^(6 - 1) = 32
1/32 in font
row 6 in pascal's triangle is 1 6 15 20, these are the coefficients, reduce frequency by 2 each time, except the last one gets halved
cos(6x) + 6cos(4x) + 15cos(2x) + 10
sine series comes out to be:
sin^1(x) = 1/1 (sin(x))
sin^2(x) = 1/2 (-cos(2x) + 1)
sin^3(x) = 1/4 (-sin(3x) + sin(x))
sin^4(x) = 1/8 (cos(4x) - 4cos(2x) + 3)
sin^5(x) = 1/16 (sin(5x) - 5sin(3x) + 10sin(x))
sin^6(x) = 1/32 (-cos(6x) + 6cos(4x) - 15cos(2x) + 10)
sin^7(x) = 1/64 (-sin(7x) + 7sin(5x) - 21sin(3x) + 35sin(x))
odd powers only have sine
even powers only have cosine
and then when frequency mod 4 is 2 or 3 u flip the sign
And the fact that cos(2nx) can be written entirely in the form of sine is a cherry on top of the cake
XD can say the same now but i usually do an extremely different kind of trig
So yea
like what?
The textbook kind
im sure u could find this in a textbook somewhere
XD well its mostly just formula based
are there angle addition formulae for cosecant?
Convert it to sine first!
1/sin(10) + 1/sin(50) - 1/sin(70)
those chebyshev polynomials could come in handy
lol
u could express this all in terms of sin(10)
Hmm yea take lcm
You get sin10sin50 +...
And then since 2sina*sinb = cos(a-b)-cos(a+b)
Just do this a few times and yea
i see..
Lmaooo
The algebra would be just hell then tho lmao
this is about all the trig i know
I mean these results are derived from the formulas you know too
yeah i can see
These are just commonly used so i kinda remember them now
XD
Damn look what i found in my textbook lmao
lmao
The official solution derived the polynomial from the basic too(they used trig identities tho since well n is small here instead of the complex num definitions) 💀
i see
my textbook
is...
confusing me
im wondering if this is even necessary
Yea no i definitely dont know enough non euclidean geometry to even realise what half this ends up doing
i really just dont wanna have to figure out how 17.30 is derived
cuz the textbook states it without any derivation
oh wait 13.12
It is the authors way of flipping you off
I would guess
💀
How th did you remember the exact definition where the derivation you wanted lied
Oh nvm i didnt read that
Isee isee
Imagine if the author just forgot to write 13.12 thingy
Aha
this looks like this which is just spherical law of cosines
Just barely but okay yea
this is all
very overcomplicated
i dont see why spherical law of cosines doesnt work
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Probably cuz author just wanted to show off their skillz lmao 💀
no its probably because its useful to format it this way
Maybe i guess yea there is a chance it is used again in further chapters
or its just useful
XD true
I haven’t seen this formula in months and I thought I finally escaped geometry
lol
ur fault for looking in this channel
Bro wtf is up with my textbook, it had a que which was relatively easy i got x =8
Though what it asked me was 3x³ + 2x² + x +1
And im not allowed to use a calculator for this either 😭
what is causing you such confusion
3 * 512 + 2 * 64 + 8 + 1 is not that bad to calculate, is it
its pretty bad
it is a four digit addition
since when did those become impossible to do by hand
!xy @faint pasture
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
But why th make me do that? There is no point in that, is there?
idk it just doesnt register as particularly hard arithmetic
u can still do the problem in less than a minute
Well i solved the problem? It was just a rant on how some authors are just cruel
And i have to do the entire problem in like 2 mins, including this shit
wdym u have to do it in two minutes
show the problem
,rccw
and this is free response?
Yep
Not cruelty maybe but just wasting the time of the students, definitely
Exactly my point!
And i saw another one just like this where i mean it was sorta simpler cuz coefficients were set for it to be not just pain, but the ans was like 17xx
DID ANYONE TAKE THE GEOMETRY EOC
In florida? Years ago
oh god its u
U forgot the comma
doesnt matter its discord
And the exclamation point
🤓
What do u want RIZZLER
Formula sheet gives you everything you need most of the time
Very little SAS, SSS, ASA, AAS congruency questions / generally 2 max if there is
Know difference between area / lateral area
Remember chords
Incredibly easy exam
Getting a 3 is easy as well. You barely need anything to pass
You’re talking abt FL right?
I tutor kids bro
damn brother you 2800 bullet?
Used to be on lichess
But lichess banned for having a lot of accounts
Wow
this triangle is symmetrical about the y-axis
So the y-coordinate is the same ofc
What do you think happens to the x-coordinate?
from the y axis to T or U its the same distance
exactly
And the distance from T to the y-axis is f
What does it mean by ***characterization ***in this context I read in a book by Moise (Geometry Metric Edition, page 501):
Theorem 6-2
"The perpendicular bisector of a segment, in a plane, is set of all points of the plane that are equidistant from the end points of the segment."
In this theorem the book said::
"Briefly, we say that the points of the perpendicular bisector L are characterized by the condition PA = PB........................................ Characterization appear not only in theorems but also in definitions........................... For example, the sphere with center P and radius r is, by definition, the set of all points Q such that PQ = r. Thus we say that the sphere is characterized by the condition."
they are defined by the condition
characterise means that something has some defining property
So all of the points on the perpendicular bisector L (and no other points) have PA = PB
All of the points on the sphere and no other points have radius r
the theorem/definition split just means whether that something is actually the definition, or rather it's another thing that isn't the definition but is always true for these points
Thank you.
Is point of concurrency and point of intersection are just the same?
How do I do this?
can you say what the dimensions (i.e. width, length and height) of the box will be?
all in terms of x, obviously.
Geometry by Moise and Downs Metric Edition page 507 Chapter 15.3: Concurrence Theorems
i wanted a screenshot of the relevant page
wait I'll take a picture
“concurrency” is usually used in the context of three or more lines
although as stated there it is trivial for two nonparallel lines to be concurrent
Triangles have too many centers though....
tell that to people grinding olympiad geometry 😭
i mean
doesnt this page tell you what concurrency means
like right at the top lmao
no, also the word characterization is not defined.
but I understand it now
thanks!
literally right here
Definition
Two or more lines are concurrent if there is a single point which lies on all of them. The common point is called the point of concurrency.
Tbf those doing olympiad geometry dont mind that cuz they usually have a deep rooted interest
“characterized” i take to mean “uniquely determined by” here
yeah but its like intersection
for two lines/curves, yes
two or more lines
also the word "concurrent" is literally mentioned
i dont understand what you are objecting to
reading is hard™️
I'm not objecting and I'm not mad, maybe I'm just sleepy at that time
...what time is it where you are
2:00 P.M. just have eaten lunch
how much longer will you be banned from help channels for?
don't reply-ping me with a question that has absolutely nothing to do with the message being replied to.
also this is not #「helpers-lounge」, why are you asking me out in the fucking open?
Chill dude
do not call me "dude".
oh no
please edit that word out of your message @stuck sleet
ok what should I call you bro?
💀
not that either
<@&268886789983436800> transphobia
"bro" is LITERALLY the worst alternative to "dude" you could have possibly picked if you tried
woah
Okay please just don't call her masculine-sounding words
well, some people don't like that.
I get that you call anyone that, but different people see those words as meaning different things, so it's best just to be respectful of whatever they want to be called
i would prefer being just called by my name over "ma'am"
the pronoun roles here exist for a reason
Ok thank you ann
please respect that
you had the sense not to double down on it all, so you're fine.
Ok thanks for the help though
what does that mean, exactly?
it means that your expressions for the length, width and height should all contain the letter x.
as opposed to being just numbers.
oh alright, just literally have x. appreciate that
sorry, didnt see. I suppose length would be like 10x, width would probably be 7x and height 1x (all in cm obviously).
Sorry for not answering earlier, its a bit late
this is all wrong.
well, no. the height is x.
how did you get 10x for the length?
well I assumed that those boxes take off 1cm from both sides, as a guess. Also I did not know that the height is x, but I do appreciate it. I assumed it while taking away the boxes. with the boxes the length is 12x, width-9x.
I am not sure or I wouldnt be asking
no
the length pre-folding is 12, not 12x.
and the width is 9, not 9x.
and no, you don't know that x = 1cm.
oh alright
how do you figure that out then?
Is there a formula for that?
the 0th step is to tone down the whats-the-formula-ism.
then the 1st step is to understand that the rectangle's width of 12 cm is shortened by x cm on both ends, so it becomes 12 - x - x, or 12 - 2x.
Okay
do you understand this
yes, I do
like, what you told me earlier was full of unjustified assumptions instead of just reading and understanding exactly what the diagram says
See I don't know what to do here, thats why I did assume and said it
I wouldn't be previously asking if I didn't understand lol
@dark sparrowHow would I use desmos to estamate estimate the value of x here, though?
your box has the following dimensions:
- width: 12 - 2x
- length: 9 - 2x
- height: x
what is its volume?
(don't overthink it)
(12−2x)(9−2x)x
I mean it would be this, this is as simple as it goes really
yes exactly.
oh alright
now you have a function of x that you can plot in desmos.
some people live in timezones other than yours, stampcake.
what?
it is 10:54 where i am, for example.
people do not usually go to sleep at eleven in the morning, stampcake.
school is more important
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
good for you bud, whats your problem?
like good for you man, but i dont get your issue here
anyway, go to desmos and input the following on one line:
f(x) = x(12-2x)(9-2x) {0 ≤ x ≤ 4.5}
the {0 ≤ x ≤ 4.5} will make it only show you the part of the function between those values of x, since we only care about those values (do you understand why?)
I am not particularly sure, no, I am exhausted so my brain in't calculating but I assume its because it should be in between 0 and 4.5?
if I was asking at a more sensible time, i probably would have a better understanding but understand I have been up all day yesterday and all morning up to 12pm, so I am exhausted due to schoolwork so I do apologize.
x ≥ 0 because x is a length and cannot be negative
and x ≤ 4.5 because 9-2x is also a length and also cannot be negative (9 - 2x ≥ 0 solves to x ≤ 4.5)
do you understand now?
I do, yes
why are you doing math while exhausted
are you on a due-yesterday deadline or sth
yup, I was busy writing a 12 page no double spaced essay all week so I wasn't able to do any of my schoolwork yesterday
*not yesterday but on friday
I put this function in and it was 1.7, that should be right, correct?
you shouldn't overuse the word it
i suppose
but yes, the value of x which maximizes the volume is about 1.7
alright, thanks
is this just polar->cartesian conversion that you're doing? @river raptor
if it is, then your answers are correct, but with two things worth pointing out:
- you should put a stroke through the middle of your 7's so that they do not look like 1's.
- for #6, you could have just avoided all the computation and said that r=0 already means your point is the origin, regardless of what theta is.
not that relevant to his problem but i have had my physics proff ask me the direction of a null vector, soo theta might matter
in what context
he was basically saying that when we just wanna point out the direction just we could add a null vector pointing in that direction, i dont really remember the exact specifics of that problem though
well just repeatedlly apply radius = diameter/2 for the white one
Thanks
quick question, when working in space, is there a more efficient way to obtain a point and a vector from a line given as a two-plane intersection rather than solving the indeterminate system?
How are the planes given?
Hmm, even though you can find a direction vector as a cross product of the normal vectors for the planes, you'd still need to solve the system of equations to find a point on the line -- and if you've gone that far, just basing the entire answer on that solution is probably the least work in general.
well, yeah, but i didn't realise i could've used the cross vector, I think it might help me, cause there are also exercises in which i don't need the point and just a vector
so it might end up being faster and more efficient
thanks
Actually, if you start by finding the direction vector, you can decide that you want either x=0 or y=0 or z=0 for the fixed point, and once you know the direction vector you can choose a coordinate that you know is not constant along the entire line.
Then, setting the chosen coordinate to 0, you only have a 2×2 system left to solve.
omg, that's actually really good
it'd save me a lot of time solving the system and messing it on the gauss method
okay okay so whats mostly on the eoc
Given area of a triangle is 5.If two of thr coordinates of the triangle are (2,1) and (3,-2) and the third point is (x,x+3) . Find the value of x
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
what are all of these letters
(x_i, y_i) for i = 1, 2, 3?
Aye
i cant tell for sure whether this formula is correct but i think it is overcomplicated
Except for finding the perpendicular distance and base length , any method is fine
why that exception
i was actually going to suggest exactly that
anything here will take time
Let me try that method
intuition tells me there's gonna be two possible values of x btw
Is there a modulus in the perpendicular distance between a point and a line ?
yes
Okay
bc the formula is supposed to return a distance
and those things tend to be ≥0, or at least were since this morning
can probably do some determinant-flavored bullshit if you really want to.
1 by 2 determinant and putting the coordinates accordingly with 1 1 1
Simple question but just couldn't solve it
I thinked i bugged the conversation
???
U can use the determinant formula andgaussion elimination further and find the area
Is this the determinant formula ?
On the right theres another coloumn
Of 1
Depending upon how many coordinates
Number of ones
Are placed
And 1by 2 is being multiplied by
Dtermniant
What major topics should I study for my geometry eoc tomorrow?
How can I determine the length with these two cases? I know one, but I’m confused on finding the other
The black pen is what I wrote down trying to figure this out
Well thanks for the help, even if the problem has to deal with sine law rather than cosine law
Yup, my mistake, should’ve clarified that this was a sine law problem 🗿I am so sorry rn
no i just misread the problem
this problem is impossible
there are two possible triangles with the info given
A could be either at the green place or the red place
we could
case 1 would be angle C = 38 degrees, case 2 would be angle C = 180 - 38 = 142 degrees
Yeah
ok ik u said law of sines but just for a quick check
in this case the law of cosines gives us
9^2 + b^2 - 2 * 9 * b * cos(38) = 6.8^2
this quadratic has 2 positive real solutions
giving us two possible values for b
corresponding to the green and red triangles
what?
angle C stays the same for both triangles
with law of sines:
we have
sin(A)/9 = sin(38)/6.8
so sin(A) = 9 * sin(38) / 6.8
which has 2 solutions
giving two values for b, corresponding to the green and red triangles
si
hi there, i just started learning inverse trigonometry, and i find myself struggling to get comfortable with it. can anyone recommend me some videos that i can watch to strengthen it? also what are some things i should be careful about while learning inverse trig?
be careful about the domain restriction
theres prob some organic chemistry tutor video on it
or khan academy
And the range too
!da2a but probably #precalculus or #discrete-math is better for that.
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Kk
What about probability
A theif is about to rob a locker containing 3 rings with 6 digits on each ring probability of him being unsuccessful
Is?
i mean #probability-statistics is very obviously named, but whatever
this is a little unclear in how it is stated
are you translating? or is it written like that in English?
Lemme send u the orginal pic of question
,rccw
"mashed with 6 different digits" sure is an interesting way for them to put it
Yupp
but ok we have a combination lock whose code is 3 digits long and each one has 6 possibilities
are you sure?
imagine the lock instead has 2 rings of 10 digits, how many combinations would be possible then? 20?
Yes the sample space would be 20 digits ithink
incorrect
a code on this type of lock is a 2-digit number. you select a digit on the first dial and a digit on the second.
10*10 = 100
not 10+10.
well there's three dials of 6 digits each
how many possible codes are there
not 18
6 to the power 3 😂