#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 45 of 1
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
so you already had some answers and wanted somebody to check them
next time post them along with the question
anyway which ones are you unsure about and why
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
@exotic yarrow hey you know how we were discussing obtuse angles in trig yesterday, i ran into another question where i didnt realise it. i think im having a hard time visualising why we subtract our angle found from 180 if the angle we got is already acute so it cannot be obtuse. heres the question
oh wait is it because the answer (149.32) satisfies the inequality 90 < x < 180 which it needs to satisfy for angle SPQ to be obtuse
@brisk ore can you show your work up to and including the spot you're asking about
I got stuck at after P = 30.68
ok hold on
this transition is troublesome
you get sin(P) = 25/49 but it is now that you need to account for P being obtuse, and take 180° - arcsin(25/49) instead of arcsin(25/49) itself.
Ohh
Yeah that makes more sense thanks
Btw
The first half was wrong because I was only taught one formula for area;
Area = 1/2 ab sin C
Are there other derivations of this formula I need to know
i mean if you remove the 1/2 factor then you'll get the area of the entire parallelogram and not half of it
and understand that 1/2 ab sin(P) would give you the area of SPQ rather thnen PQRS
Yeah 👍 thanks
when i solve the quadratic and i get theta is 34.48 and 180 - it to get the answer, i usually take that to be the final answer and its finished but for some reason the mark scheme wants me to include 34.48 and 34.48+360 in my final answer. Does anyone know why that is the case
because 34.48+360 is also a solution
...?
what are you confused about
im confused because in this question we only take 520.5
oh yeah
nvm i get it now
thanks for the help @nocturne remnant @native jetty
do you guys know how to do this
Can somone please explain to me why he would change 2pie/3 into pie/3.
pi, not pie. and we didn't "change 2π/3 into π/3"; that's not a thing.
what they did was write cos(2π/3) and sin(2π/3) as -cos(π/3) and sin(π/3) respectively
however without context it is hard to tell why
@faint comet gonna need to see the original problem in full, please
Like the argumentative of the angle ?
@dark sparrow yes I understand how we change it and they equal the same but I don’t get why, the question is to write it in polar for
Form
if the question is to write z1/z2 in polar form then the last step is pointless
the line written in red directly converts into $\frac{1}{2} e^{2\pi i/3}$
Ann
No In caretsion form sorry
...
ok then maybe that step is meant to be intermediate to calculate cos and sin of 2pi/3.
assuming you don't know these directly.
also you're definitely not using the word "argumentative" correctly here.
Like the argument angle or whatever where you minus it from 360
i think you are confusing yourself.
How is -sqaure 3/1 the tan of -pi/3
Hey guys
If i divide both sides of trig equation by trig function, i need restrict function domain, so that it doesn't equal 0 for sure, right?
Yes, you need to deal with the case where the denominator is 0 separately
For example i want to divide by sin x, but what if the solution for an equation is pi beforehand, but when i divide by a trig function, i basically don't allow the solution to be pi by default. Am i right?
well if you take note separately that x=π is a solution then you can divide by sin(x)
Ah, so you're transforming an equation where x = pi is allowed into one where x = pi is not allowed
you'd have to look at all values x = kπ though so as not to miss anything
So you're losing the solution x = pi, and so you need to check it
Also this, remember there are infinitely many solutions to sin(x) = 0
But i dont know if the solution is pi beforehand
(all of which i just listed)
Yes, so you definitely need to check it
Cause you don't know
can you show us the equation you are looking at?
No, i was asking generally
But, i think i got one
before dividing both sides of an equation by g(x), you have to account for all values of x where g(x) = 0, and see whether or not they are solutions
for this it does not matter whether g is trigonometric or not
Here is the equation: 2sin x * cos x = 3cos x
dividing by sin(x) would be unhelpful here
The solution is pi/2, but by dividing both sides by cos x, i doesnt allow x to be the solution right?
And i will get sin x = 3/2
So it's wrong
dividing both sides by cos(x) and failing to account for x = π/2 (and in fact x = π/2 + kπ for any k ∈ Z)
will lose that family of solutions
How to divide by function but not lose the solution?
again, account for them separately beforehand
you can just say that if x is a point s.t. cos(x) = 0 then both sides of your equation will be equal to 0
So what would it give me?
I understand that they will be equal to 0
so you get a family of solutions. and you don't know yet whether that's all your solutions, or only a proper subset. but you have them, and now you can divide by cos(x) to look at what happens with all the other values of x.
But at what point do i get those first solutions? How do i get them if i only know how to solve the equation via dividing by function.
...
either you're overthinking it or there is a language barrier
actually, if you don't mind me asking... what is your native language?
are you implying that there's only 1 correct method and all other methods are wrong?
No
there's two methods that i can tell you about
If you don't mind, can you tell me them?
method 1 is to write in plain text the following: "We want to divide both sides by cos(x), but this risks losing solutions when cos(x) = 0. Thus we will check those explicitly, then proceed with division by cos(x) when looking at all values of x except those."
then solve the equation cos(x) = 0
and then verify that all solutions of it are also solutions of the equation
and then, once you have done that, divide both sides of 2sin(x)cos(x) = 3cos(x) by cos(x), and solve the equation 2sin(x) = 3.
method 2 is to not bother with division by cos(x) at all, and instead to subtract 3cos(x) from both sides, then factorize:
2sin(x) cos(x) - 3 cos(x) = 0
<=> cos(x) (2 sin(x) - 3) = 0
<=> [cos(x) = 0 OR 2sin(x) - 3 = 0]
and then solve each of the two smaller equations separately, and union their solution sets at the end.
By "union their solution sets" you mean writing a general solution?
"general solution" and "solution set" are synonyms as far as i am concerned.
and union means union.
like the set-theoretic operation called union
∪ <- this
Generally, do you consider trig equations to be hard? And is it necessary for calculus?
why reply-ping to an irrelevant message? if you wanted to get my attention, you could have just @-mentioned me.
@Ann like that?
@ann_dec
Ok
but to answer your two questions, in that order:
- trig equations are not all hard, any more than algebraic ones could be. there are easy ones and there are hard ones
- familiarity with trig is definitely necessary for calculus, but i am not sure to what extent. but the more the better.
Ok, thanks
Root sorry
ok, so what is the best description of your confusion?
(A) "I don't know how to find tan(-π/3) at all."
(B) "I think tan(-π/3) is NOT -sqrt(3)."
(C) "Something else -- I will explain myself now."
B
ok, why do you think tan(-π/3) ≠ -sqrt(3) ?
Becuse sin/cos of -pi/3 how does that = that ?
could i get some help
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
tan x + tan 2x- 3tan3x transform in product
Would someone be able to explain to me why this uses inverses?
The video I was given to watch just went through the steps of finding the answer but didn't actually explain why that process was being done
cheeseburger 😔
do you get that tan(theta) = h/5
Yes, because it's opposite over adjacent
I know it's expressed as arctan or tan^-1
yes
yes, but that doesn't matter here really
so
arctan(tan(theta)) = theta
inverse functions mean if you plug one function of x into its inverse function, you just get x
does that kinda make sense or nah?
well I kinda assumed that the arctan cancels itself out on the left side when they were doing the video
I was just confused on why they even did an inverse function in the first place
they're finding theta
was it because theta is outside with the h inside of the parentheses?
so they are reversed in this instance
take f(x) = 2x + 3. lets say you want to get x alone.
let f(x) = y. so y = 2x + 3
if you swap y and x you get the inverse function., you get x = 2y + 3. now you want to get y alone again. so,
2y = x - 3
y = (x-3)/2
thus, the inverse of f(x) = 2x + 3 is f(x) = (x-3)/2
does that kinda make sense?
the inverse of f(x) is also denoted as f^(-1)(x)
which looks weird on discord lol
anyway
arctangent is defined to be the inverse of tangent
I get that. Maybe it's the wording of the problem that's confusing me. Because if I saw this on a test, I wouldn't even know what they want me to do.
Like what's the tell that you're supposed to be finding the inverse here?
The fact that it's theta(h)
?
they want you to express it in terms of theta
yeah
"express the angle of elevation theta as..."
so that means
theta = ....
they want you to express it as a function?
theta(h) = ....
oh I think I see now
so since the angle of elevation is tangent by default
it kinda wants you to get rid of that tangent by doing an inverse to cancel it out
so it's only theta
basically yeah
Hey guys
I got a question
If one of the solutions for a trig equation is, for example, -pi/6 +2pin, should it be this, or should it be 11pi/6 + 2pin?
Are they both correct?
they are both correct
Guys I really need help
I got 4 packets and I dont really understand them
Packet A
Packet B
Packet C
Packet D
Pleaseee help!!!!
My mind actually broke in half over this question. I know how to do it, I just really CAN NOT keep track of anything. I'd really appreciate if someone double checked my answers 😭
sure, but it might be easier for you if you drew it
Hm
this is horrendously wrong but i think i got the hang of it now
wdym horrendously wrong
how much of it is wrong
i thought most of it was right, except im not sure about those last two
last 2 are wrong, rest is right
could someone double check this
i dont like things being wrong
that's what i thought 🤣
that's generally a good thing to not like 👍
one of these is apparently wrong, but my teacher has a history of getting typos or mistakes on their answer keys so idk if it's right or wrong
are yall classmates or smthn 🤣
yes
yea we struggling tho fr 😭
fr
yea but when clancy submitted it, it said something was wrong on this question
i'd bet your teacher's answer key has a mistake
or else all three of us got it wrong 💀
i got the same answers you did
💀
welp i'll wait till clancy gets a response from the teacher
thanks for the help
yea ok bet 👍
this happens sometimes
yeah 🤣
oh well, thanks again for the help
help ping plz
i despise proofs
proofs are the absolute literal worst
they make no sense
like you "prove" something, and then the actual proof is like "no, actually..." and then they say exactly what you just said but in the most complicated way possible
like bruh 💀
like how am i supposed to know all the details to include???
bruh
we know the triangles that make up the quadrilateral are similar because the share two angles and one side
ASA similarity
and the side length is the same
thus, the proportionality is 1 to 1
Hmmmm
thus, the triangles have the same side lengths
and uhh
QT is proportional to RS in the similarity context
i don't know how to say that in a way that formally makes sense
but it makes sense in my head
thus, QT = RS
thats the general gist of the proof maybe
unless they did something weird
oh is that right side your answer?
LOL WUT
YES BRO
XD
😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭
im glad i helped...
Can I kiss you
no idea what i did tho 💀
Yea
i see
out of curiosity, what is CPCTC
Pls helpppp I found out how to do D and B
Hey guys
I got no idea how to solve this trig equation:
tan (x+1)/tan(x-1) = 2 + sqrt(3)
Can anyone explain how to solve it?
$\frac{\tan(x+1)}{\tan(x-1)} = 2 + \sqrt{3}$
Ann
this?
like the angles inside the tans are x + 1 radian and x - 1 radian?
@upper karma
Yes
are you 120% certain?
Yes
just as i thought...
this says $\frac{\tan(x) + 1}{\tan(x) - 1}$, NOT $\frac{\tan(x+1)}{\tan(x-1)}$.
Ann
there's two ways
either you first isolate tan(x) to reduce the equation into the form tan(x) = a, or you find a way to apply the tan(x+y) identity to (tan(x) + 1)/(tan(x) - 1)
the latter will take a little bit of tinkering
Hi
hello, do you have a math question to ask?
Hi! Yes
Uhm... Formulas for shapes... Like there were areas... perimeter... volumes
Sry
so what's your question...?
1... what other things are asked for shapes when it comes to formulas?
the thing is I need a refreshner to all sorts of shapes
Cylinder, cones,
It's such a broad question, but I don't know how to ask.
go to http://khanacademy.org/ honestly
It's been a long time
look through their geometry stuff
arcsin(x) - arccos(x) = pi/6
Can you solve it please
I think it is sqrt(3)/2
But my method was quite intuitive, i dont know how to solve it properly
Are these all correct?
How to prove 54
your trig ratios seem correct but some of those values are suspicious
especially #6 -- how did you get a negative answer? are you sure your calculator is in degree mode?
have you tried anything on your own?
I was trying to see if cotx-cscx or cosx + 1 would cancel out
It didn’t work and I don’t know how to go from there
Also I just can’t get these other 2 for the life of me
ok that's 3 problems, we have to handle them one at a time
Yes #54 first
(If u want)
right
for 54, and other problems like it, it often makes sense to write both sides in terms of only sin(x) and cos(x)
i suggest you do that
on the left, obviously
actually the "write in terms of sin and cos" thing goes for all 3
Ok I got this
the others, you mean?
there's two of them.
again, write them in terms of sin and cos.
see where that takes you.
.-. I just got 85 tysm !!! But I have no clue how to do 74 which has x and y
Where is 74? I would like to see the question too!
I don't know much about trigonometry but I try my best.
Ok 👍
Here
Not yet this is my first time learning this stuff
:/
Did you done this?
@rugged shuttle
Ah I did it
Then just cross multiple
Here is my work @empty yew
And
You can't square the cos having different x and y
It just remain as $\sin x \sin y$
KingDanger
$\cos x \cos y$
KingDanger
It's simple then.
Oh wait it’s the same thing
🤔
$\cos(x) \cos(y) \neq \cos^2(xy)$
Ann
reminder that cos(x) is not the product of x with a number called "cos"
Because instead of writing sin x (sin y) as sin^2 xy, u can just write it as sin x sin y for every time u multiply and it turns out the same
Yes I was confused for a sec
instead of writing sin x (sin y) as sin^2 xy
sin(x) sin(y) is not equal to sin^2(xy).
👍
But how is 85?
$\frac{1-\sin(x)}{1 + \sin(x)} = (\sec(x) - \tan(x))^2$
Ann
this one?
Yes
@empty yew this is what I got for 85
i feel this is a complicated route to go down
also your lighting makes it kind of hard to read your work
your pen is too faint
i recommend once again writing everything in terms of sin and cos
in this case the RHS becomes $\paren{\frac{1 - \sin(x)}{\cos(x)}}^2$.
Ann
Sorry
Wow I’m dumb
;(
I'm pretty much confused with your work
Did you converted $1 + \sin(x) = \cos^2(x)$ ?
\sin and \cos
KingDanger
@dark sparrow please explain this.
explain what?
This.
that's a copy of the questoin
I think that’s where I used cross multiplication
question*
I don't know how to solve the question!
then you could have asked me "please explain how to do this question"
bad
Yes
That's what I wanted
Sorry for bad wording!!
$\text{RHS} = \paren{\frac{1 - \sin(x)}{\cos(x)}}^2 = \frac{(1-\sin(x))^2}{\cos^2(x)} = \frac{(1-\sin(x))^2}{1-\sin^2(x)}$
Ann
two more steps remain, which i hope you and cyberr are both able to see.
Is $\frac{1-\sin(x)}{1+\sin(x)} = \left(\frac{1 - \sin(x)}{\cos(x)}\right)^2}$?
KingDanger
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
I don’t get it do u cross multiply with lhs or simplify rhs further
Sorry I misunderstood something very dumb but now I'm clear
i do not cross multiply anything
in fact i recommend against ever doing such a thing when proving identities.
Is there a special reason why not
because then your work makes it read as if your very first step is assuming that your goal is true
which is extremely not kosher, to say the least
and in general
if you wish to write down the identity that you aim to prove (ie your goal)
at least put a question mark directly over the equals sign
Kosher?
Alright fair enough I missed my teachers lecture so this is very helpful
What's the meaning?
Ohh thank you!
There’s one more problem…
@empty yew wanna try and solve this before we ask Ann
Or I ask Ann?
what's the question?
okay
why don't you start with difference of squares on the left
replace tan(u) with sin(u)/cos(u) because tan(u) = sin(u)/cos(u)
once u do that then simplify the whole thing
Bruh
what?
tan x + tan 2x- 3tan3x transform in product
yes
you're done
factor out the sin^2 if that wasn't already evident
then use the pythagorean identity
btw
you should not write <u> the way you've done there
you're setting yourself up for confusing it with v
which is bad!
? How
Shoot ur right

🥺
,, (\sin (u) \cos(u) )^2 = \sin^2 (u) \cos^2 (u)
nyxie9151
@clear anvil
if u want to work with this
wait no what do you want to work with first?
I guess this…
Like i mentioned factor out the sin^2
^
Ok lemme think
Wait
that's not how multiplication works
,, \frac{\sin^2 (u)}{\cos^2 (u)} \cdot (1 - \cos^2 (u)) \neq \frac{\sin^2 (u)}{\cos^2 (u)} \cdot \frac{1 - \cos^2 (u)}{\cos^2 (u)}
nyxie9151
Wait why
,, \frac{5}{4} = \frac 14 \cdot 5
nyxie9151
not $\frac 54 = \frac 14 \cdot \frac54$
nyxie9151
sure np
Did you solve?
Sry I'm gone then.
Why won't anyone help me? 💔😔
what is the problem?
Helpers are just people volunteering their time to help you. Be polite and patient.
I've had it sent since yesterday
It's these packets
@wanton edge
I don't understand them at all😔
Hello guys
How to find general solution for these two solutions
Sometimes i don't understand how to get a general solution
The general solution is 2pik/3
This is what photomath gave me
But i dont know how it added these both solutions and got the general one
no
Sorry but what is the context here
yeah the context helps too
actually yeah just post the actual trig question u got this from
don't want to operate with half the context
That means cos(x) = 0 or 4cos(x) + 2 = 0
I know
good
thats the same answer, right?
yes
yes, but perhaps there was a format requirement to leave your answer as a fraction
nope it said i can have integers or fractions
right so there's 4 "pairs" of general solutions
cos(x) = 0 -> gives you 2 pairs of general solutions
4cos(x) + 2 = 0 -> gives you the other 2 pairs of general solutions
cos(x) = 0 gives me pi/2 + 2pik and 3pi/2 + 2pik. But i can combine these two solutions, convert them into pi/2 + pik. Where k is an integer
Maybe i don't what these "combined" solutions are called
So, instead of two solutions i can get one
union
Yes, thanks
np
So how do i get the union solution for this
I think there is nothing you can do. Since
$$\frac{4\pi}{3} - \frac{2\pi}{3} \neq \left(\frac{2\pi}{3}+2\pi\right) - \frac{4\pi}{3}$$
Arya
Photomath said this
The union solution was 2pik/3
That includes 0 which is not the solution to the equation
When k = 0, 2πk/3 = 0
i don't know
I am very skeptical about that since Photomath itself does not say that the general solution is (2πk)/3
np
By the way
If during solving an equation i get smth like this: ax^2 + bx + c = 0
Should i solve it as a quadratic equation?
Or factorize this non-perfect trinomial?
Which method is faster
depends
also btw sorry i didn't see your message for the previous question
u realize that you don't have to condense your solutions right?
it's equally valid to leave all 4 solutions as is
so you don't have to trouble yourself with "omg how to consolidate this"
I didnt know it
on the actual equation
you can't just generalize
quadratic formula always works but with the downside that it's slower
Especially using discriminant
factoring, occasionally works (maybe it works most of the time in your case), but when it does work then you save alot of time
I mean D = b^2 - 4ac
Ok
what about it?
Do you have a specific question in mind?
No
Is me always the answer it’s not in the choices
... are you in grade 6?
,rccw
how old are you?
... <@&268886789983436800> underage, but an edge case?
we can't allow users under 13 years of age on discord
When
Ok, see you in a week then, sorry chief
actually I'm just gonna ban you for longer, terrible pronouns
oh yikes
rip bozo
rip bozo indeed 🫡
What did Bro do?😭
rib bozo 🫡
be a child
"only two genders no lgbtq" in pronouns field
Oh
?
that's the command for rotating an image counterclockwise 90 degrees
Rotate CounterClockWise
cause yours was misorientedd
anyway the answer is among the choices -- it just is not quite immediate
But wouldn’t it be tan 40 because Ab is the opposite and bc is the adjacent and was supposed to find which function will get us the value of AB
both can be used
consider that tan(40°) = AB/BC, but tan(50°) = BC/AB is just as good
Yea I did do u want to see my work
Is writing quadrants as Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 a bad habit or does it not matter?
I just find it faster than doing the roman numerals but don't know if later on in math this is gonna mess me up lol
,rotate -90
depends on context
if you draw a cartesian plane (the normal plane with four quadrants) then you usually don't need to write the quadrant. if you are referring to the quadrants, i would say its better to say "quadrant four" instead of Q4. you don't have to say "quadrant IV". then again im missing the context
anyway if you can't think of the roman numerals or something its probably ok, just other people might not know what you mean by Q4
i wouldnt say its particularly a bad habit though
No need🙂
I do know i just wanted to check that you completed or not 😀
it's for trig and trig equations where you need to know which quadrant has +- of sine or cosine
oh
visual is the best imo
I've just been writing them as Q1 to speed up note taking but have been wondering if that forms a bad habit for later if Q is used for something in math later on
if you're doing homework your teacher might not know what Q1 means
oh i see, i wouldn't worry about it
as long you aren't doing homework and the person grading your homework doesn't like that you don't use the roman numeral notation
for some reason
👍
Do y'all know how to do #7?
do you know the ratio between the sides of a 30 60 90 triangle
yea kinda
its uhh
the sides of a 30-60-90 triangle have a ratio of 1 : (sqrt3) : 2
where 1 is the shortest and 2 is the longest (hypotenuse)
right?
Yea
Yes I have one, I'm not sure how to, I transferred to this school not long ago and she just shoved it in my face to explanation no nothing
Okay!
this is the ratio between the sides of a 30-60-90 triangle
btw do you know what a hypotenuse is?
No not really, I know that there's a leg
I think I know the equation tho
C= √a²+b²
oh yeah ok um
we can't use that here because
we only know one side
we'd need two sides to do that
Ohh okay
yeah
but
with triangles that have the angles of 30 60 90
we have just a ratio between the sides
Okay
so the hypotenuse is just the biggest length of the triangle
theres three lengths
the hypotenuse is the biggest
does that make sense so far
XD
sqrt(3), not (sqrt3)
its the same...
i was just trying to seperate the colons but
XD
i have a feeling im not making sense
No
if you try to put parentheses like you did but with a more complicated expression, then (sqrtx+1) becomes ambiguous
yea
but theres only x
you could have meant $\sqrt{x+1}$ but it could be misread as $\sqrt{x} + 1$
in this case
Ann
right
i know, but good habits.
yeah thanks 👍 🤣
what don't you understand about the problem?
I’m slow
um
do you understand what i did
Yes
ok cool
nah its uhh
(1,2) means the x value is 1 and the y value is 2
does that make sense or nah
not exactly
uhh
how far apart are the points
like look at the graph
💀
i'm struggling to explain
uhhhhh
sorry my phone died lol
no prob 🤣
it takes a century for it to get to 1%😔
💀
depressing😔
You should js give the answer so u don’t have to stress urself tryna explain 💯
Yea kinda lol
😭
But how r u gunna learn it with just the answer? What if u got a quiz on it or smth ( ik I'm not gunna understand this lowkey I need an answer too)
with a 30 60 90 triangle
if the shortest length is 1, the longest length is 2
if the shortest length is 2, the longest length is 4
if the shortest length is 3, the longest length is 6
in other words, the longest length is always 2 times the shortest length.
similarly, the medium sized length is always sqrt(3) times the shortest length
wait you kinda right imma be confused when I have a quiz 😭 (I skip math class whenever I have a quiz)
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
😭
Okay
so with your triangle, you have one length, right?
Rightt
alr 1 sec
Ur teaching an infant
🤣
reposting problem
ok
so in your triangle you have a 90 degree angle and a 60 degree angle, whats the last angle?
30°
yea
so is the length opposite the 30 degree angle going to be long or short
would the length between A and B be longer or shorter than the length between C and D
Wait wait wait would the answer be 20?
it might help to know that in any triangle (not just 30-60-90, and not just right ones), longer sides are opposite to bigger angles.
Sooo can someone help me please
Wanna see the directions it got on there?
sure yeah
ok it says trigonometry
so im assuming
we should probably do it the trig way
lol
and it looks like you've been doing trig
so yeah
I copied everything u see on tht paper.. 💀
I know the equation for sin
what is it?
Sin∅=a/h
Yea
Uhh I think
wait i'm dumb
that's actually cos
Oh rlly
Oh
but we actually need the cosine one lol
Oh lol
so yeah
cos(theta) = a/h
Dang it's 1 am
do you know the unit circle?
bruh
And be like whoopsie I didn't see tht one
🤣
uhh
i'm not sure
are you getting taught by a teacher?
do you get the
sin^2(a) + 9/25 = 1
part?
Yea, a new one
1 - 9/25 = 16/25
you might want to go up to them and tell them you don't understand it so that they may be able to help you understand it 🤷♂️
they just subtracted 9/25 by both sides
Man I switched out of my old class cuz it was a new teacher and he didn't know wht he was doing and the put me into another class with another new teacher
💀
BR 💀
Good idea 😓
It's mental 😫💔
the teachers are there to help you, even if they suck 😭
💀
it happens lol
This one time we were taking a test and the smart kid finished early and the teacher graded it and gave it back to him while we were taking the test and everyone flooded the smart kids desk getting the answers from him
Well he wasent rlly a smart kid
LOL
He had the answers on his phone
LOLOLOL
Lol
the plot twist i wasn't expecting 💀💀
Lmaoo
nah but uhh
if the teacher can't teach
try to understand it
and/or
you're screwed
is a nice way to look at it
I can get help from another teacher
🤣 💀 half joking
oh
LOL
Ive got one more teacher if he can't help me then I'm rlly screwed
Hes on the younger side so maybe he can relate to me more
yeah
just dont stop looking for help
unless it really is hopeless
do you need help w this
I would text my old tutor but she's just as helpless as me in math
Sure but it's impossible to teach me lol
nah its just not getting taught to u in the right way
if many ppl try maybe it will click 🤷♂️
are u just learning trig
Yea
Yea
No they didn't
Yea i can
So that will make sure u don't forget which one u need to use
$\sin(\theta)=\frac{opposite}{hypotenuse}\\cos(\theta)=\frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse}\\tan(\theta)=\frac{opposite}{adjacent}$
Alrighty!
SLURPZZZ
Try to do that one
Well first, what function do u need based on the sides that they give u and want u to find
i cant find a mechanics channel so ill post it here. when we resolve the weight into the triangle and find the opposite value by doing hypsin(theta) what direction do we take the opposite value to be going in?
my teacher has a thick accent and is bad at teaching she cant do most of the hard textbook questions but we just have to manage
Made her do trig with surds but they weren’t bothered to teach soh cah toa that’s crazy 😭😭
given some length of string and you use that string and pull it taught to make different shapes
would the area change?
like a circle and square with the same permitter is the area the same?
no, the area is not the same
even if you limit yourself to something simple like rectangles
4 m of string can be made into the shape of a square with side 1 m, for an area of 1 m^2
but the same length of string could also be formed into a 1.99m by 0.01m rectangle, for an area of only 0.0199 m^2
I’m not sure if I understand your question but when you resolve the components of the weight force, the perpendicular component would be opposing the normal force of the surface, and the parallel component would be alone the direction of the incline
Like logically if you were standing on a steep incline you’re naturally going to feel like you’re sliding down, that’s what the component of gravity does
yeah that makes more sense
thanks
I can't solve this.
Average jee questions 😭💀
complementary relationship between sine and cosine
Help pls ping 🙏
huh oh theresd a picture im just getting the wrong answer
Well**...** don**'t you think its a bit off to you?**
nvm i got it
i think it looks correct
it COULD be slightly off but idk
geometry algerbra 1 and 2
How do you know when to use soh cah toa, or inverse soh cah toa?
it depends on the problem
I wish to learn this... even if it takes step by step, please!
if you want the opposite over hypotenuse, use sin. if you want the hypotenuse over opposite, use csc.
or wait
did you mean inverse sine, or cosecant
step 1: we need a problem so i know what you need/how to help you lol
I'm trying to take math seriously
Lolll
that's good XD
Because I need to be prepared how to know basic math
you might want to try to write it in terms of pi and estimate it
pi is about 3.14
I started trigonometry. I learned the a^2 + b^2 = c^2... that was easy
Then if there was the angle... you look for the opposite
adjecent, hypothenuse... adjust those to the "formulas"
but idk which one to use as sin, cos, tan, or inverse
The constant inside cos() doesn’t look rational
Try pi
Then scale the graph accordingly
ok so uh
Errm you don’t need to reset the whole thing
oh**.**
Go back to this and replace 3/1.4 x with pi x
theres:
sin = opposite/hypotenuse (soh)
cos = adjacent/hypotenuse (cah)
tan = opposite/adjacent (toa)
csc = hypotenuse/opposite
sec = hypotenuse/adjacent
cot = opposite/adjacent
because the middle line is 3 below the x axis...?
@trail tendon they already figured two constants out here and there’s no need to change it
maybe i don't understand what the prompt is
So**...** -2 stays the same**..** ?
Yeah, both -2
ohh are you trying to match the dotted line?
Yeah
you can see that the complete line graph is just the dotted line graph but compressed by 3/2
(By observing their periods)
With this, you can change the pi into 2pi/3
The amplitude here is 3
Remove the -1
Sin cos and tan give u ratios based on an angle and inverse sin cos tan gives u an angle based off a ratio
help, with this problem, the solution comes out as a function of a,b and c
<@&286206848099549185>
sin(2alpha)=a/b or am I getting something confused
I think cos(2alpha)=a/b, can you help me more please
yeah it is
I accidentally wrote sin instead of cos
rip
wait so you’re trying to get b
don´t worry
isn’t that solved
b=a/cos(2alpha)
or do you need another form
oh yeah right
no alpha
So you're saying you're trying to know the complete ratio... both sides... in order to do that, work with the given angle
yes
For inverse sin cos tan yes
if you want read my help forum
pls try
How do I write the general Solution like should I try to combine the answers or no
wait I realized there's sin cos tan, there's csc, sec, and cot and an inverse for all these :/
:/
Lol yeah sec csc and cot are reciprocals of cos sin tan (respectively) and also give a ratio given an angle
I was scared for my life when I realized this
honestly barely anybody gives a shit about arcsec and arccsc
arccot is on thin ice already

