#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 38 of 1
This math video tutorial provides a basic introduction into trigonometry. It covers trigonometric ratios such as sine, cosine, and tangent. It explains how to evaluate it using right triangle trigonometry and SOHCAHTOA. In addition, it explains how to solve the missing sides of triangles and how to find the missing angles using inverse trig f...
so your issue is that you don't know what a square root is?
it's 0:06 am and i am so sleepy.
no what
i dont know
bro please just teach me
;-;
well, not everybody likes it.
anyway, i already linked you a video that explains the basics of trigonometry.
pleaseee
i need this specifically
sending a thousand messages containing "PLEASSEEEEEE HELP ME PLEASEEEE I AM BEGGING YOU" (or something to that effect) won't speed up the process.
in fact it'll only slow it down.
ok ok, ill shut up
also you probably should have come here earlier than midnight for help, just saying.
sleepy is not a good state for doing math.
ok
let me ask a question bluntly
do you know what sin, cos, sec, etc. mean?
yes/no
If you want help, don't spam random letters in the chat
sin= front and miring/ ac cos= side and miring/ac and tan= front/side
sorry but its urgent, sorry if it bothers you
idk whats miring in english
but its mostly on ac
that most farthest line
the line opposite to the right angle?
that is called the hypotenuse.
okay, so you know that the trig functions are ratios of sides.
yes that
great.
so then all that remains is to find the hypotenuse, and you will have all the numbers you need to compute all these ratios.
(and it becomes an exercise in keeping straight what is where.)
what?
id understand
and thats exactly wht im having a hard time on, like root front+side= hypotenusa right?
root front+side= hypotenusa
this is misremembered or just poorly written.
given that you admitted earlier that you are "used to cheating", it's kind of expected.
the person behind me is chinese, so he is smart
behind?
really glad and regret at thes time
how would you cheat off of somebody behind you?
when in class, i look behind
it seems inconvenient unless you have a 3rd eye on your back.
now im at home
anyway
yes yes, what is the value of the sin cos tan
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
no.
cuz i gotta wake up at 5 am anyway, ima just push it
ok
and frankly i kind of dont want to guide you anymore bc this attitud is just not welcome here
the PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM, which is what you tried to state here,
says that in a right triangle, with legs a and b and hypotenuse c, we have: a^2 + b^2 = c^2.
in particular, when the other two sides are known, and you want to find the hypotenuse, you may write that same equality as: c = sqrt(a^2 + b^2).
look up "pythagorean theorem examples" on the internet if you need to.
find the hypotenuse in your triangle.
then calculate all the ratios.
i know all that, what im having problem is calcuatliong the hypontesuie
what is your problem with that?
can you write down the expression you need to calculate, without doing any calculations?
this "and"
ok
you just are not reading what i say
So you’ve been given “a” and “b”, right?
even though i gave you the theorem directly and you do not even have to google it yourself
@mortal crow this is his triangle
Oh yeah, so what’s his issue?
What’s he trying to do?
the value of sin cos tan alpha and cosec sec and cotan beta
i am completly not know this
he's trying to find the hypotenuse
Just that?
he said that he has trouble with it but so far has not told me where exactly.
no, also a bunch of trig ratios.
yes, idk the value of sin cos tan alpha and cosec sec and cotan beta
You know what the trigs are defined as right?
Like sine is opp/adj, you know the definitions?
Anyone good at inscribed angles?
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
What is the use of cyclometric functions, besides being a formal way to convert values into angles?
"cyclometric functions"?
do you mean like inverse trig?
arcsin, arccos, arctan? these? @upper karma
and what do you mean by a "formal" way? formal as opposed to what?
so instead of just saying that cosx=1/2 then x x = 60 deg, we actually can express it as x = arccos(1/2)
that doesn't answer my question of "what do you mean when you say 'formal'"...
I cant find any way to express it better
if we have an equation [\cos(x) = \frac{1}{2}] then one solution (x) (out of infinitely many possible solutions) is given by [x = \arccos\ab(\frac{1}{2})]
cloud
they both use x
use AEB to find x
then use x to find DE
how do I calculate drop factors
wdym by drop factors>
whats the problem here
it seems you filled out the proof
oh the last one is wrong since theres an x
there is no place in the proof where you stated 2 triangles as congruent
have you found the length of that arc yet?
guys whats the best method for remembering the inverse function values on the unit circle
they are almost the exact same angle-ratio pairs that you (presumably) have already committed to memory.
except backwards.
can someone help me with this kangaroo contest question
area ratios
if two triangle have the same base length then the ratio of their areas is the ratio of their heights
similarly if two triangles have the same height then the ratio of their areas is the ratio of their base lengths
thank you
Do you know the formula for circumference? Use that. Keep in mind that 45 degrees means that particular sector is 1/8th of a circle edit: shoot I didn’t realise that was sent almost 11hrs ago 💀
how can i prove the first one, been trying with cubic sume but i get stuck with cosines
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Does anyone know if there’s an alternative to arcsec because my dumb calculator only does cos sin and tan as well as their inverses
And I will need arcsec arccot and arccsc
I know I can use the reciprocals
But not the reciprocal’s inverse
Thank you
for what will you need them, i wonder
Instead of writing 1/tan84 or smth like that (also didn’t know what Daniel said)
Cot84 for efficiency
that's for forward trig functions
and why is efficiency such a concern exactly
what problem(s) are you solving that make a difference of 2 keystrokes significant
bruh 💀 😐
using your eyes
If I'm learning trigonometry, should I use a calculator to solve stuff like "sin(35degrees) = ac/5" or Is it better if manually solve it to learn?
as far as i'm aware there isn't a commonly-known value for sin(35°). you should definitely know the "common values" for angles like 30°, 45°, and 60°, and you should know how to solve for ac to know what to plug into the calculator, but you're not expected to be able to find values of trig functions for more uncommon angles
e.g. in this problem you'd be expected to go from
sin(35°) = ac/5
to
ac = 5 sin(35°)
then just put the right side in a calculator
alright thanks
Do all circle have the same curve?
no, a circle of radius r will have curvature 1/r
intuitively, consider a very very large circle
say, of radius 100000000
it basically behaves linearly unless you zoom super far out
now how about a very small circle?
radius 0.00000000000001
you have to zoom very far in to get that same linear behavior, otherwise it will much more noticeably “curve” than the big circle
Any advice on finding the area of this trapezoid?
half sum of bases times height?
It doesn't matter that it's diagonal? Can I use distance formula to find the length of the bases and height?
hardest thing will be finding the distance between the green and blue lines, and even that's easy bc gray is their common perpendicular
no, it does not matter which way the trapezoid is facing.
yes, the bases are P1P2 and P3P4
the grey is perpendicular to green and blue?
yes
because green and blue are parallel?
but not for this reason
so base1 = P1P2 = sqrt[ (2-4)^2 + (6-4)^2 ] = sqrt(8)
so base2 = P3P4 = sqrt[ (1-2)^2 + (3-2)^2 ] = sqrt(2)
Maybe not. I am thinking of the flip and switch
the what...
oh flip and switch is flip the slope, multiply by -1. so 1/(-1) * -1 = 1
here what's known are the two slopes, and the perpendicularity is what needs to be found out.
Then
base1 = P1P2 = sqrt[ (2-4)^2 + (6-4)^2 ] = sqrt(8),
base2 = P3P4 = sqrt[ (1-2)^2 + (3-2)^2 ] = sqrt(2),
height = P2P3 = sqrt[ (4-2)^2 + (4-2)^2 ] = sqrt(8).
Which means
area of trapezoid
= 1/2 (sqrt(8) + sqrt(2)) * sqrt(8)
= 1/2 (8 + 4)
= 6
very nice.
you may need to use the point-line distance formula
and then that will be your height
Is my markings correct?
can we see the full problem?
as-is: the fact there's two apparently different points both named A, and the same for C, looks sus.
the markings appear to be adequate based on the perceived sizes of the angles and sides.
@cerulean turtle
We know that alpha + beta = 90°, what if we have -sin10° is that cos 80°?
Hello ! Is there any book that contains proof for geometric formulas such as areas and volumes? I find it hard to, for example , to understand why the area of a rectangular is different from a parallelogram or why the area of a circle is radius* hald the circumference.
I know how to find some of the areas with integral calculus but i also dont know how the volume integral works. In my book the volume integral is given by a formula that also contains basic volumes knowledge , which i dont have.
you absolutely do not need calculus for the elementary area formulas
a lot of the basic ones for quadrilaterals just boil down to
"chop this triangle off and glue it back on somewhere else to turn the parallelogram/trapezoid into a rectangle"
some of the nontrivial volume formulas (pyramids/cones/spheres) do require integration potentially
congruency
BAC = DCA
you didn't show the full problem.
...
this looks like your solution to something
and makes nothing clearer. at all.
I mean is the markings correct? I'm having trust issues on myself
i can only repeat myself
if the diagram is to scale then yes they're correct
BUT there are two pairs of same-name points. which is STILL suspicious.
you have decided not to comply with my simple request to show the original problem (or give me some reason why you can't, like "i made this up myself" or "i lost the original".)
Do we include the C and A?
what do you mean by "include"?
and was there anything besides this diagram? like some words about some shit being equal to some other shit?
...
i have no clue what you are talking about.
and you are not answering my questions with any measure of clarity.
so i'm out.
It looks like you're dealing with similar/congruent triangles, right? Idk if this is intentional, but you also have another pair of points named A and C. I would change them to E and F to reduce confusion. Or, you can instead name the points on the right-hand trinagle A', B', and C' so the correspondences are more obvious. But your proof is correct. BAC ≈ DCA because you showed that all the other angles (A and C, B and D) are the same.
It isn't unless there's more information given
that can't be concluded from this diagram
If triangle AEF is equilateral or isoceles, then AD = BE.
they aren't equal then
BE is 27 though right
yea
lit. hey also is kahn academy a good supplemental site for geometry or alg 2
yes
ok thanks
Those are specifically high school
yeah
They are 💀.
ik I was agreeing 😭
You said you guess so 😭!
………you edited it!
nah nah you are just crazy I never said that
No!
Mwuhahahaha
No!!
what point of concurrency on a triangle is in the center of the circumscribed circle?
<@&286206848099549185>
nvm i got it
@upper karma sorry but I just stopped having access to that help channel for some reason
Where we left off though, slope of BC is 1/-3
How? I tried using area of equilateral triangle
how what, exactly?
Area of the hexagon
can i have a complete sentence please
Can someone help me find mind x y and z
Because this is an equilateral triangle and we know one side:24. We can set the side with x to 24 and solve. Similarly, we can set the side with y to 24 and solve
For z, each angle is 60 degrees since it’s an equilateral triangle. So simply set the expression to 60
hey guys any important theorems i need to remember for tangent lines, arcs & chords, or inscribed angles? cuz i hava quiz tmrw (ping)
I don’t know how they computed the area of the hexagon. I tried applying the area of equilateral triangles and multiplied that by 6, but it doesn’t match their answer.
show your work?
i don't think they did any computations per se.
they just broke both shapes into equilateral triangles of side length 2, and made it apparent from the picture that the triangle is made of 4 of those, and the hexagon is made of 6.
from which the ratio of their areas is obvious unless you overthink it (like you seem to have done).
Oh yes. I just read this poorly. Thanks.
This isn’t the area
Explicitly
yeah i think you just overthought it imo when it was right there. real "a picture's worth a thousand words" moment etc.
Do you have any recommended resources to learn geometry “rigorously?” Do you think it’s worth studying geometry in isolation? Or it’s better to pick up on things as you need it? @dark sparrow
¯_(ツ)_/¯
in america they put you through the wringer of 2-col proofs
or so i hear
Is there a textbook people recommend?
it focuses way too much on pedantic shit like “all rIGhT anGleS arE cOngrUenT”
idk of any textbook
and not enough on the big ideas
That’s correct
Euclid’s? 😂
no
😭
it’s written in incredibly dated prose
and is not necessarily the best introduction
Yeah just do like 500 geometry problems? Proof based or computation or both
same reason I roll my eyes at people trying to learn big subjects “from first principles”
that’s better for a second pass maybe
the first time
What reason? Because they’re reading old text?
you risk getting so bogged down in the formalisms
that you lose sight of the big important ideas
yeah
Sounds like you’re advocating HS approach
like 2 col proofs are just bad
^^
and in america you are forced to distinguish an angle and the measure of an angle
and yet the majority of American high schools still use it
which like
which is dumb
who cares??
Okay then what? Khan academy? Just run through a ton of geometry questions?
I staunchly refuse to put “m” before my angles LMAO
Oh I think that’s so dumb.
yeah like
you can just take it for granted at that point that angles with the same measure are congruent
devoting maybe a minute or two to saying it in class
my class had us do “flowchart” proofs which were just as bad
no, I don’t fucking care about “definition of congruent segments”
I was helping someone with HS geometry, the little pieces I know. They started talking “measure of angle” I was like it’s just an angle lol -_-
and then just write shit like $\angle A = 40\dg$ and not worry about that shit
Ann
please stop making me rewrite that over and over 😭
and also $AB = 5~\mathrm{cm}$ or whatever
Ann
You missed the bar at the top. Is this AB a segment?
the only reason teachers “care” is to produce more meaningless busywork for students
serious or joking?
I don’t joke, except when I am
that doesn't answer my question
My geometry is weak. I’m not afraid to admit it
the only time I put the overlines is if im referring to parallel/perpendicular or defining a point as an intersection of two segments
dont waste your energy on this pointless notational pedantry
so like congratulations for finding the one answer to my either-or question that's not only uninformative but infuriating in doing so
I’m confused lol
i asked you "[are you] serious or joking?"
I wasn’t joking. Your answer you seek.
your answer of "i don't joke, except when i am" did not tell me that.
anyway, now that you've confirmed you are serious
what could "AB" possibly refer to other than a segment, tell me
in the us they typically exclude the overline if you’re talking about a length
If we were in person, you’d have your answer, even with that sentence.
given that what i wrote is a statement about AB equalling some length
no, i wouldn't actually
i would be confused still.
A lot is communicated through body language, but anyways, the over line
what about the overline
The product of two matrices is a scalar 5 cm? 😂
matrices
in fucking geometry
Just a lesson in context
Okay so khan academy. Maybe Olympiad geometry has nice problems? Or is that torture
if you’re lacking foundational skills in geo
Olympiad geometry is absolutely not the play
If you took a poll of all the people who are frequent helpers on this server, do you think the distribution of time spent studying, practicing, thinking about math, would have low variance for that group?
just hop on KA and drill your foundational skills first
AoPS alcumus also has some nice problems that are a bit more challenging but still computational in nature
Art of problem solve? Okay. Computation is nice. Proofs are nice when you’re concerned with congruence of shapes
AoPS has a textbook on basic geo as well
that you can find online
it has its issues but all things considered it’s a decent introduction I think
Thanks
If I’m proving that the LHS = RHS, and the RHS = tan(A/2), and I have 1 within the left hand side. Can I say 1 = sin^2(A/2) + cos^2(A/2)?
Instead of 1 = sin^2(A) + cos^2(A)?
How do you find the radius of this blue circle?
which one
oh the blue one mb
pythagoras
the segment from (-a,-a) to (a,a) is its diameter
I’m supposed to write the equation Cotθ=x/y for the 5 other trig ratios
Having trouble after finding tan
uhh... does anyone want to help with this?
Then no.
<@&268886789983436800> test cheater
@silent radish this is a bannable offense jsyk.
cant you compare those two?
yeah compare them and find intersection points
cud also use distance formula right?
same difference lmfao
hey i can help
so firstly what I would do is realize that 2*sqrt(2) + 1 and 4xcosine(x/2) + 1 share some similarities
firstly, you could rewrite 2*sqrt(2) as 4xsqrt(2)/2
and then you see that the only difference is really instead of cos(x/2) it is sqrt(2)
so you want to find values of x such that the cosine of (x/2) > sqrt(2)
@signal venture
Okay so draw a big triangle there. You have
2a^2 + 2a^2 = 2a^2
4a^2 = 2a^2
…
Yeah this is wrong. If the diameter is -a to a, doesn’t that make it length 2a?
2a^2 + 2a^2 = 2a^2
???
where, pray tell, do you get the right-hand side from as "2a^2"??
Prayers aren’t needed here. I’m lost lol
"pray tell" is a fixed expression to which i ascribe no religious meaning.
it is like a more polite version of "where the fuck"
(2a)^2 + (2a)^2 = diam^2
4a^2 + 4a^2 = diam^2
diam^2 = 8a^2
diam = sqrt(8) a = 2 sqrt(2) a
does this answer your question
Thanks for being polite 
Doesn’t the diameter go from -a to a? Oh no of course not. It’s not a “90 degree” line. It’s the hypotenuse. This gets back to our previous discussion…
.....
If you don’t like the way I phrased that don’t worry. I understand now
Yes thanks. I made the mistake of thinking the hypotenuse was 2a. Very wrong.
Can’t remember the reason for step 10 of the proof, and can’t find it in my notes either.
Can some1 please help me with this one
The chinese characters at the top mean "as shown in the figure"
Can someone help me with this problem? I keep getting large negatives and idk why
are you using a calculator?
if you are: check whether you're in degree mode or radian mode.
Ah thx
,calc sin(35)
Result:
-0.42818266949615
yeah, sin(35 rad) is negative huh
,calc sin(35 degrees)
Result:
0.57357643635105
🤯
,calc 5+5
Result:
10
,calc sin(pi)
Result:
1.2246467991474e-16
,calc 180
Result:
180
,calc sin(180)
Result:
-0.80115263573383
,calc (90 radians)
Result:
90 radians
Result:
-0.87926487577869
@primal jasper i don't fully get what you are asking but here a step wise solution anyway: the 10 th step is just taking the ratio of AB/CB=2CE/2CD(given/trival) which is equal to CE/CD which gives similar by SAS
,calc 60+9
Result:
69
cool
🙂
I'm sorry okay 😔
Did you know
69 = (6×9) + (6+9)
no, thank u for that
Use your notes
?
anyone able to help me?
But you didn’t ask a question….
This is an actual quiz for school?
But is it graded?
no
I was about to say…
Study
yk i would if ik waht to study lol
or how to do it
or anything
idk im sick rn and the teacher dont post nothing
so
Find worksheets online
That's what im doing in my spring break right now
Gotta use that time wisely
@jagged wyvern dont be an ass and help him out thats why we and him are here in the first place
in reposnse to OP's question here are the answers:
a) None of the above
b) 1 and 4 I think
c) 3
@tacit gale
anyone know pythagorean identities?
Yes, sin^2 + cos^2 = 1 | sec^2 - tan^2 = 1 | csc^2 - cot^2 = 1
But ya can just look them up you know
what's troubling you?
Take the inverse sec function of 1.348 on your calculator.
Can someone pls help me solve this? It’s trigonometry and you are meant to solve for X and when you are looking for the answer you have to round to the nearest hundredth :’) I’ve tried everything and I still keep getting it wrong
use a calculator
45/x = cot36
Can anyone help with this I've been stuck on this for an hour and a half
what does m mean, and do the numbers represent the lenghts of the arcs?
I think m is the measure and the numbers are arcs
Any tips on this question? I am sure a triangle is involved
use cos and sin to find the distance travelled east and south seperately
add them together
and then use pythagoras to convert back into angle and distance
you'll want to have multiple triangles I believe, and utilise the cosine law
the diagram shows the angles and distances given by the problem
@orchid scaffold if 31x+7 is the circumference for the circle and TU and UV are tangents then : let O be the center of the circle and so Angle TOV=$\frac{11x+17}{31x+7}\cdot 360$ now angle VTU=(1/2)angle TOV so Angle TUV=180-($\frac{11x+17}{31x+7}\cdot 180=180(1-\frac{11x+17}{31x+7})$
That's what I got
ideal_37
what is the symbol at the very left of the image?
that is capital Q @dark sparrow saying question and then :
ok
can someone help me with this: (sinx)^1979 + (cosx)^1991 + sin2x + cos2x = 1 + sqrt2
looks ugly
consider what is the maximum possible value of (sinx)^1979 + (cosx)^1991
consider what is the maximum possible value of sin2x + cos2x
did anybody made progress on my question ?
oh ty. very helpful
did you?
i tried using double angle formulas
i tried to apply it to every single term but that aint possible
cant think of anything other
Vector question: given a vector $\overrightarrow{AB}$ in component form $\langle a,b \rangle$ find a vector that is perpendicular to it
Cewkins
Is it correct to use the slope * perpendicular slope = -1 to find the line that is perpendicular to it?
And then any vector that is equivalent to that line can be considered perpendicular to AB
Which means that there is an infinite number of answers as long as they are on that line
Also assuming that the vectors start from the origin point (0,0) you can easily obtain the slope of the first vector using y/x
I did it using this method but i am not sure if that counts or of there is a more ideal solution
Also using the dot product it ends up being $(a)(x)+(b)(f(x))=0$ where $f(x)$ is the slope-inercept line with a slope of $\frac{-1}{m_1}$
Cewkins
^^^
Am I right
25/24 is not the same as 7/x
enjoy my paint skills, blue triangle and red triangle are congruent
so $\frac{25}{24}=\frac{7}{y}$
647TheSheep
express y in terms of x in this equation and solve for x
or just use the result you already got and solve for x using pythagoras
yeah but every time I try to solve it I get 0.5 and Im not sure if im correct or not
I can discuss vectors here right?
yeah that's fine
the worst thing that can happen is you get redirected
if your stuff is sufficiently high caliber
Oh okay i thought i did something wrong posting about them above
which one?
Do you know sine law?
No their hypotenuse are different?? Or am I wrong
Also would it be
so $\frac{25}{24}=\frac{7}{25-x}$
holi
?
you're going to use SOHCAHTOA to solve for the missing side. For instance on number 12, you're trying to find the angle but you already have the opposite and adjacent so in order to find the that angle you're going to set it up like tan(x)= 8/20, then you have to use inverse trig function to find the angle so on like calculator you're going to type in Tan^-1 8/20 in order to find the angle.
does someone have a copy of trig identities
The traingles are similar right?
Yes
Should the ratio be the sides that are the same to each other? i thought 24 lines up with 7 not 25
Or maybe i am missing something
Ratio should be the given sides of that triangle. Big over small
But one side needs to contain the x value in order to find it
guys do you know how to do no,(10) and (12)??
I can't use intersecting chord theorem
Makes sense
What i did was split the two triangles, the big parts for big triangles and small one are 24 and 7 respectively and small parts 25-x and x respectively
What is the exact answer btw?
Btw how is the smaller side 25-x? Shouldn't it be just x?
The answer i am getting for x is 1.96, and for the last side its 6.72
Which lines up with this
help pls ping
Power of a point
Help
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
yes step 1
i dont really understand
looks overcomplicated
and clunky
and the variables are not really clearly defined ...
hmmmm
which ones exactly
l and n
n is apparently the square root of the number of transistors...? but why'd the number of transistors be a perfect square
also why do you need to speak of the transistor count at all
wait maybe i think its best if i like draw what i mean by n
"doubling the number of transistors while keeping the area unchanged means that each transistor now needs to occupy half of its former area" is not something that needs 17 pages of bureaucracy to justify
anyways thinking about this more i realise i made a wrong assumption here
by "n^2 squares" i thought like, the amount of columns and rows of squares in the grid are equal
so you have n*n = n^2 total amount of transistors
but thats clearly not a requirement so in reality its just n*m where n represents the amount of rows and m the amount of columns
I understand if i am still overcomplicating this though 
ok nvm this is way too dumb i really fucked this up
yes you are overcomplicating
ok i guess i will start from the beginning
Im sorry Ann but something is really not clicking about this? Like take for example a 2x2 area where there are 4 transistors, the amount of transistors doubles to 8 but i dont think you can partition the same area with only 8 squares (you'd need to 9, because the square root of 8 is irrational)
Oh wait is my answer correct just to verify?
yes your answer is correct @upper karma
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
ohh okay so im just being unnecessarily verbose
Is there a geometric representation of A^3+B^3+C^3=D^3
Like a higher version of pythagorean theorem
that isn't how Pythagoras generalizes
Yeah i said "like"
there is something called fermat's last theorem
you can have a^2+b^2+c^2=d^2 (with exponents 2 rather than 3) be represented geometrically as a box with sides a, b and c, and diagonal d
but with cubes i don't think there is a good visual
it says a^n + b^n = c^n cannot hold for integers bigger than 2, if thats what u are getting at
he's got three addends on the left
@fossil mica if you were looking for a generalization of Pythagoras, that's the one
if you were looking specifically for a visual to represent your equation with cubes, i don't think there really is one.
@dark sparrow by the way this is what i had meant in my original attempt. I am going to of course simplify this because its too verbose but just wanted to make sure if my logic here is correct even?
since when do we know they make a rectangular grid tho.
nor do we need to assume that at all.
you are still overcomp.
by a Long shot
i mean if its a bunch of squares being laid together then surely its going to make up a rectangular shape?
and re: this, that is too small a number. but you could imagine laying them in a 45° rotated grid relative to the original.
there are other things than transistors in your computer surely.
okay i relent haha how should i word this better and come to the conclusion of 1/sqrt(2) without my mental gymnastics
yeah but how should i go about it instead? I am misled currently because i only have my mental gymnasticy attempt circulating in my brain right now
.
you don't worry about the shape of the motherboard they tessellate
Vector question: Given a vector $v$ and the value of the dot product $u\cdot v$ find the component form of $u$.
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
(NEI as-is!)
Cewkins
there is not enough info to find u.
Its not in english originally
If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway!
I am aware
Let me explain my thoughts completely first
Alright
also what language is it in
Arabic
ok
i don't speak that, but the math notation should still be legible.
so send it still
So as you can see the value of u * v (dot product) is given along with v in component form
here is the issue with this problem: there are infinitely many values of u in each case.
is this the expected answer?
Using the dot product formula and rearranging the terms i get a linear equation, meaning any point on the line should be correct right?
does your book have any kind of answer key at the end?
as-is, yes.
but the problem looks strange to me still... why didn't it say "find all possible values of u" instead of just "find u"
the latter wording to me implies there is only one
Nope, and the book doesnt provide examples on this problem
It really sounds more like a conceptual thing
wonderful
I just wanted to ask if this is a valid answer
so your teacher stuck you with an underspecified problem.
if someone demanded an answer from me at gunpoint, i would give them the same answer as you did.
He asked about it in class, i gave him this explanation but he seemed not sure himself that much about it so i just thought i ask
Lmao
,rccw
Yeah the rotate function
can you translate?
Yes, 38 and 40 "Find a vector perpendicular for each vector"
What i did was find the slope, then find the perpendicular slope and write a y=mx equation
Every point on that line should be valid, and since the vector is assumed to be in standard form then b = 0
Well theoretically there shouldnt be, even the length of the vector itself is irrelevant as long as it satisfies the conditions
Interesting questions, i have encountered other ones similar to this that are even harder
Thanks for the help
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
that "Thank you." in #6 is so passive aggressive lmao
2
no
ok then what progress do you have
wow - so I read the problem...
5 lines beginning with "Let __ be.." and then "Show that.."
this is why I don't like geometry
To prove that MF=MG and that angles ∠PFO and ∠PGO are right angles, we will use properties of the nine-point circle and the characteristics of the given configuration.
Let's denote H as the orthocenter of triangle ABC, N as the midpoint of AC, and K as the intersection of DE and BC.
Observation: Notice that O is the midpoint of segment EF.
Claim 1: OM is perpendicular to DE.
Proof: OM is a perpendicular bisector of EF (as O is the midpoint of EF), and EF is parallel to BC. Therefore, OM is perpendicular to DE.
and you did this all blind?
you can considerite like that cause i ve done a bad configuration on paper
That sounds like you do have a diagram, just one you think is "bad"?
i got it thank you (took me 2 days ...)
ah congrats 🙂
to start,
<D is 90 degrees because that is the definition of perpendicular
<E is also 90 because of the same rule
do you see the solution now?
how to approach this
do you have a diagram?
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
(warning shot)
it looks like there is not enough info as drawn
also not clear what the problem asks you to dod
the lesson thing is called pythagoras by proportions, it states to find all the missing values
Everything
that is everything
so it does NOT say anywhere that any of these triangles are right triangles, then.
my teacher said I just have to ASSUME point C is a right angle
this is a reference photo of the notes we took
I think I’ll the first half and any of you can do the other half if someone else joins
“Find the missing values for each right triangle including the length of the altitude”
is the question
What you think Ann
oh i understand what you guys ment now😭 it is “Find the missing values for each right triangle including the length of the altitude
see, this is why we ask to send EVERYTHING, incl. ALL written instructions.
completely sorry abt that
yes
ok
and i understand to find N i would have to square root C
o
first off lowercase letters
There’s 4 problems in total right
second, n = sqrt(AD * DB) maybe
i see
third, sqrt(c) doesn't make sense from a dimensional analysis standpoint (it would not be measured in meters like a length should)
now to actually find n here in a way that doesn't cause suffering: consider that ABC and ACD are similar triangles
... did you read my last msg
or did you tunnel-vision on the previous one
now to actually find n here in a way that doesn't cause suffering: consider that ABC and ACD are similar triangles
honestly im tunnel visioning
so AC is congruent to CB?
no but we assume that their similar?
we do not "assume" anything.
im sorry if im troubling u im just confused😭
blech
here is the diagram again
i claim that $\triangle ABC \sim \triangle ACD$.
Ann
do you know what similarity of triangles means
yes
that if they had the same ratio of corresponding sides their angles are congruent?
Exactly
that "if" is troubling.
the statement "these two triangles are similar" means two things, each of which implies the other:
- each pair of corresponding sides has the same ratio
- corresponding angles are equal
or congruent if you want to get technical or are forced to draw a distinction between an angle & its measure
anyway
CD/AC = BC/AB.
go nuts.
How bout trying a Pythagram theorem on AC and CB to get c
no diagram given
ok, but have you made one yourself?
guys how can i find the value of trignometric ratios more than 270 degrees for example sin(A) where A is more than 270 degrees.
for eg sin(3700)
what's the significance of 270 degrees as a threshold, as opposed to 360 (a full turn)? are you like, allergic to the 4th quadrant or something?
in any case, sin and cos are periodic and their period is 360°.
as is tan, but it goes through two cycles in a full turn, so its period is 180°.
for the instance of sin(3700)
you're simply making a 360 rotation 10 times
just like what ann said sin and cos are periodic
also why you gotta be so rude to this gentleman
what part of what i said was rude?
"are you like, allergic to the 4th quadrant or something?"
i don't know about you but that comes off a quite condescending
i intended it as a joke, and one that's obviously a joke at that -- since mathematical objects are not physical things and thus can't cause any kind of real allergic reaction
Chill
@upper karma did i answer your question there btw
Yes
ok
Thank
Can someone help me?😔😭
An isosceles trapezoid is a trapezoid like this:
Try giving each length of interest a variable name
do you have any particular classes of identities in mind here or just in general?
also what do you mean when you say "the value"?
@worldly nest
so trig values of simple angles
one moment
there is this kind of silly mnemonic which i call the "trigonometric hand"
which also fits into the 1st quadrant of the unit circle the way i've positioned it here in the photo
the others, you derive via symmetries.
im having a problem with the last sub question, been stuck on it for almost a day
Hello people
What do I do with the thirty million trigonometry formulas I have to remember for high school
Am I supposed to memorize them all and be able to actively use them while solving equations, and if I am, how many, roughly?
I am just wondering if I have to eternally solve trigonometry questions or is there an end to it (for high school, at least)
30 million?
where does such a high count come from?
I was being sarcastic
i made this list a while back that fits on 2 pages
or just over 1 page if you don't count the somewhat pretentious sixth section
(which you can ignore really it's more of a curiosity)
I see
So learning these will suffice for any trigonometry question I face on the exam (high school)
pythagoras and angle sum/diff are the big ones
think so
i mean maybe triple angle identities too
but you can derive those
from angle sum
After this, I did an exercise on trigonometry, and it seems they are not that difficult if I am good enough at algebraic manipulation.
It is a relief to hear that the ones I learnt in that chapter alone will suffice for high school.
Well thank you very much.
Fellas can we ask any trignometry question even if its easy?

(i.e. yes)
i feel embarrased
actually
easy asf questions for my o levels but still
okay then
this doesn't look like trig to me.
but ok
progress?
i see some angles marked with something that i read as "8°". is this your doing?
@solid condor
@solid condor are you like, still there or what
Yeah I saw it but forgot to react
Thanks ;))
I got it now
corresponding angles 🤦
Oh wow thanks
8 degree 💀
hows 8 degree like an obtuse angle
I’ve heard of cotangeant, secant and cosecant, but what are they used for?
(currently grade 10 student who learned about sin cos tan recently)
cotangent , secant, cosecant are the opposite trig ratios
like, 1/tangent = cotangent , i.e. 1/tan = cot
So do they form like another triangle or something lol
u can say so
cuz for example cosec = hypotonous/perpendicular (The opposite of sin)
Dunno if this channel is appropriate for analytic geometry but gawd dayum these questions were something
The example questions given are definitely not enough to cover this entire thing
bruh wtf 😭 but yea this is the right channel to put that in for better or for worse lmao
loll
isosceles trapezoid. h is perpendicular. can someone explain? I tried Pythagoras theorem but couldn’t solve it by plugging the values
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
pythagorean theorem is right idea
you want to find AB : DC; one way to proceed is let AB = x and DC = y and go from there
Hi
I've been stuck on this question for a few hours
Can anyone help out
I'm pretty sure my answer is wrong
well you miscopied
on your diagram you've got AT marked as x-9
instead of x+9 as it should've been
It would be really funny i think if that was the only error
I broke DC like so, then I attempted to do x^2 + (x + y)^2 = (x + 2y)^2. Then I got stuck at x^2 = y(y + 2x). I don’t know how I can find the ratio from this.
I have an interesting preposition
Why do we not identify triangles as quadrilaterals because they possess 4 sides technically [sherman line]?
"heehoo i get to proclaim established terminology as wrong on a technicality" is not as interesting a take as you think
whats a sherman line
some kind of construction that shares some properties with the 3 real sides
The Sherman line is a line that shares the same properties as the other three sides
Bisected by the nine point circle tangent to the invircle and a chord of rhe circumcircle
nobody in their right mind would think to call all triangles quadrilaterals based on this. it would be ridiculous.
and if YOU do that, you're guaranteeing that you won't be understood.
Although the math is accurate
again, your only motivation for this seems to be to introduce unnecessary confusion into established geometrical language in the name of "technical correctness"
which is just so pointless.
how would you even define a triangle even? if you insist on considering it as a type of quadrilateral?
for that matter what would you need to have as the definition of a quadrilateral which accommodates triangles-with-sherman-lines?
triangles can be defined by 6 points, does that make them hexagons?
Triangles would be renamed to fit the definition of quadrilateral and named on that basis
name me a definition of "quadrilateral" which accommodates both shapes already known as such AND triangles with your sherman line.
clearly you want to redefine that word.
so the stage is yours.
triangles also have euler lines, why not make them pentagons?
I will reply tommorow at this same time

Thank you!
the Sherman line possesses some of the same properties as the 3 sides of a triangle (i.e. tangent to the whatever circles) but it doesn't actually pass through any of the vertexes of the triangle. It's referred to as "fourth side" in quotes, don't take it literally
no you see the fun part is where you take it literally anyway to be self righteous
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs!
Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
they are congruent
they’re also parallel
to get from V to T how do you move in the coordinate plane?
however you move you do the same for getting from R to S
oh yeah
I tried using the distance formula
you don’t need it for this question
but I got like 50 square root
