#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 23 of 1
so now i use bxh/2?
did you find the height?
no
so a^2+7^2=25^2
correct
yep
np :)
well because of 45 degrees yes y = 10
but for the other cases you should learn the trignometric ratios of some special angles
ohh
like for 30 45 and 60 degrees
oh
for 6 is it y^2+7^2=x^2
and y=7?
uhm how?
I did the same thing that i did for 5
have you read about right triangles?
yea
what does the pythagoras theorem state?
This video explains the Pythagoras’ Theorem formula and how to apply it. For more information on Pythagoras Theorem visit https://revisionmaths.com/gcse-maths-revision/trigonometry/pythagorass-theorem
For more maths revision resources visit https://revisionmaths.com
try this
phythag is probably a short for pythagoras theorem
yea it is
how isnt this correct?
the side opposite to the right angle is not x
wym
try watching this
I did
isnt y opposite to the right triangle?
yes
so it's x^2+7^2=y^2?
yup
ahhh
but you cant find x and y with this information
why
how would you proceed?
solving it
7^2 becomes 49
then u subtract it form both sides
and take the square root
from both sides
and then ur done?
i think ur right
I should be yes
what do i do now then
have you heard of trigonometry?
yes
do you know how to apply it?
not rlly
try understanding that first, then this should be a peice of cake!
ahh
wait trig is cos and sin right
how does trig relate to the question?
you still need help with this?
he does yes
yes
@upper karma ok so find all angles in those triangles and I'll show you something fun
okay
yay
so for 6 we have 30, 90, andd
?
what
30 90 and what lol
arent those angles
im tryna figure that out
you did geometry before trig right?
you should know that the total measure of angles in a triangle is 180 degrees
yes
60
yeah
what do i do now
so this is a 30, 60 90 triangle
yes
so if you know this stuff you can now figure out how to find x and y
wait what
how
sorry im sick and i have to do this hw so im kinda confused
and x
I'm talking about the x on the picture with both x and y
so i alr made an equation with pythag
wait do i solve it with the angles?
is this doesn't help you then I don't know what will
I'm sorry but this is extremely basic stuff
it does but like to solce x and y u need to make an equation, no?
you don't have to, you can solve it right away
oh
it's my first time ever learning geometry
you said that you did geometry before trig
yea i started this summer
i started trig 2 days ago
I mean you know little to nothing about geometry so why'd you start trig
true
that's why im practicing rn
ok but if you don't understand this then I can't help you
I simplified it as much as I could
i kinda get what u mean
but the someone said u need phytag for this
that's bs
for triangles with angles 30, 60 90 and 45, 45 90 you don't need pythag
you need to know their properties
the question asks us to find x and y and to write the answer in the simplest radical form
so like most of the time to find x and y we use equations
just. use. this.
okay
He's trying to explain that 30 60 90 triangles have this pattern for all real values of a and because your triangle is a 30 60 90 triangle we can apply this pattern.
Now if you compare this image to the triangle in the problem you will notice that a=7 which lets you solve for the other sides.
that's basically what I told him
yea i figured out what u guys meant a bit later but then i had to go
i just had to subsituite it
what is the law of sines
For all those people who find it more convenient to bother you with their question rather than to Google it for themselves.
hey, I solved that limit but I used l'hospital rule
without knowing it, you're not gonna be able to solve it
and you also have to know chain rule
It can be solved without l hospital
Tho it involves knowing lim (sinh/h) as h tends to 0 is 1 and same thing for tan.
Multiply numerator and denominator by 5x, group the 2x with tan , the 5x with sin, giving you an answer of 5
that's the answer i got
Like… a right angle triangle has an angle 30 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees. The length of the hypotenuse is 10cm. What is the length of the base of the triangle?
Yep
@lucid talon
you have to pick a reference angle
if the angle is ADJACENT to the base, you’ll do the cosine of that angle
if the angle is OPPOSITE to the base, you’ll do the sine
without images is a bit difficult to explain
,tex .sohcahtoa
Akira
yes, that’s it
Oh yeah true… I am referring to the Adjacent…
Thanks!
then you’ll do the cosine of that angle
Yep! Got it!
x/10 = cosine
np, we are here to help
And Akira!
np, surprising you're learning sohcahtoa in grade 7th but like I have learned this in grade 10th lmao
canada moment
Hi! I am trying for a maths competition in Australia… it is called Olympiad… it is a hard competition, that’s why I am doing it now…✌️
I see
you’ll thank yourself later for learning this earlier
😅😄🤝
i learned solo in 7th
good for you...
What's solo ?
i mean trig by myself using ixl
my school system kinda sucks
Ahh okay I thought you meant some math abbreviation
Hey anybody got any resources to learn about trig functions deeper? I know the basics, and stuff like the addition theorem for sin, and cos, but the rest like how the sine / cos are calculated (for values with no special properties) are a complete mystery to me, and it feels akward to use them without really understanding them.
There’s a few gifs that show
here’s cosine
Or if you turn your face 90degrees it becomes sin
you need to know about the unit circle if u want to understand that
yes
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
I meant 1
Ok, do you know what happens when a triangle is made using the endpoints of a circles diameter?
That's perfect fine, it makes a 90 degree angle at the circumference
Ok
Now you should be able to find angle LKE
👍
Thx
Np
You think you can help me on another one?
I cant explain the shape cause it’s like origami type idk lol
Send a picture if the shape
its 39
Thx
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Let's backtrack before you move on so you actually know how to do the problem
Angle AQD is an inscribed angle
We can use that fact to find what angle AQD is
Using the image I provided above
Ok
Can you point out what degree the intercepted arc is?
80
On this image, not mine
Well get to that
I did 78 x 1/2
Ok that is the correct process
Or is it 78 divided by 1/2
156?
^
39 and 156 is half and double 78
Inscribed angle (the angle were looking for) is half of the intercepted arc
The intercepted arc is 78 degrees
Half of 78 is?
39
Ye
There is a way to solve it using pytag, although is loooong. By extending downsides that 7 units long segment with another 7 long units segment you obtain the base of an isosceles triangle. Because of of it's angles is 60 degree we proove that this new triangle is equilateral wich means all it's sides have same length. y will be 2 times the base and x will be the height of the equilateral triangle that can be found with pytag.
why do we need geometry just use a ruler and protractor
Most of the time problems are not drawn to scale
Or if you mean applied geometry, rulers and protractors are not good for exact measurements
(it was a joke)
Oh, you sounded a bit genuine
oops
You wouldn't believe how many of my classmates said that exact thing lol
just learn all of trig and geometry lol
AHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
what have you tried @fair heron
help
I see nothing wrong there
A+B+C = 180
yeah, everythings fine, so dont worry
Hint 1: ||C=180-(A+B), B=180-(A+C)||
Hint 2: ||cos A+cosB=2cos((A+B)/2)cos((A-B)/2)||
Hint 3: ||cos2x=1-2sin^2x||
Hint 4: ||Law of sines||
yoyo i just need the answer please
we dont give answers srry
bro its just this one question please
nope
can i see your work?
@teal bison hehe i'd recommend putting trig identities on a piece of paper so you can look them up quickly
do you guys do tutors?
I'm having a bunch of trouble with this identity
Excuse the doodling, I needed an outlet for my intense frustration
@naive shale would you like me to show it to you with AM-GM
no i got how to use it
infact i used AM-GM only
and it was a 2 step thing lol
btw which class r u
Grade 12
india?
oh k
Rewrite 1 as sec^2 x - tan^2 x and factorize
Huh
$$\frac{\sec x - \tan x + \sec^2 x - \tan^2 x}{\sec x + \tan x - 1}$$
$$\frac{\sec x - \tan x + (\sec x - \tan x)(\sec x + \tan x)}{\sec x + \tan x - 1}$$
$$\frac{(\sec x - \tan x)(\sec x + \tan x - 1)}{\sec x + \tan x - 1}$$
NEON
@coarse tusk this is what I meant
"Two sides of an isosceles triangle have lengths of 2 and 12. What is the length of the third side?" I'm not asking for help I'm asking if the answer is correct I went throguh the entire learning process again and rethought it out but would the answer be 12? cause that's the only conclusion i came too but i want to make sure
I also need help on this cause I seriously don't understand the unit is on Trinangle inequalities
i'm being serious when i say this and yes i went back, nothing in the study work showed a single problem on this and i'm so confused and idk how to go foward
The sum of two sides must be greater than the third
i figured it out
A rhombus must be a parallelogram, but a parallelogram is not necessarily a rhombus (though it is possible)
Ok
trapezoid -> parallelogram -> rectangle -> rhombus -> square
trapezoids have a pair of parallel sides, parallelogram has its opposite sides parallel and congruent, rectangle has 4 congruent angles, rhombus has 4 congruent sides, and squares has 4 congruent angles and 4 congruent sides
every parallelogram is a trapezoid, every rectangle and every rhombus is a trapezoid and a parallelogram, and every square is a trapezoid, parallelogram, rhombus and rectangle
👍
ohk
that flow chart isn't accurate
Its okay its just to give a general idea
Can someone please point me in the right direction on where to start with this question. I am having a brain fade.
Thank you
wrong ideas are generally bad
is this perhaps more accurate? from Math Monks
better, but classification of trapezoid is off
should there be right-angled trapezoids?
ramonov can you help with my above problem?
traps are quadrilaterals with at least one pair of parallel sides
yes
dang
how "has" one pair creates misconception with "atleast"
then this should be the correct one?
https://youtu.be/wO61D9x6lNY i found this interesting
i had to watch it twice just to get it
though i dont get the sharp corner thing
the ones i marked in red
and probably partial fractions
differentiation is actually quite simple if you don't mind memorizing some simple rules
and parmesan equations are pretty easy too
hehehe
are those syllabus from what grade?
from a levels so it should be the last year of high school equivalent but this doesn’t include anything from the ‘further math’ syllabus though
which is a different syllabus also taken in last year of high school
from a US perspective this is roughly precalc through about half of calc bc
that is a wide range
like
it's very rare for diffeq (with integrating factors and stuff) to be taught in high schools
ngl it seems to me like lessons ranging from 7th-11th grade
yeah it does look like it contains a couple of gcse stuffs
but who knows, im not familiar with us syllabus anyway
that’s not the us syllabus that’s the uk
i see
my high school had it but only after i left
my life would be completed if i could do those kind of math
this one looks pretty interesting too
https://tasks.illustrativemathematics.org/content-standards/tasks/1505 hey, I found this article concerning which definition of trapezoid is agreed upon. What could u say regarding it?
the stuff at the top? the proof stuff? that's what math is all about
that's like the actual interesting bits of math
the rest of it is just backdrop and building blocks
how long do you think it’d take before I get to that level? 
usually first or second year of uni
real math is all about proving? 0_0
and I've barely proven anything
most people haven't except some two column proofs in geometry
I heard two columns is just a bunch of trivial stuff?
it's... it's teaching you how to apply theorems to carefully, methodically prove stuff
which is not inherently bad
but it's tedious
mathematicians don't need it spelled out to them that a = b implies b = a
yeah bc you have like 200 of them
working on it
I once saw recommendation that comp math proofs introduces real math better
although i have no single idea, lmao
here's one from "real analysis"
wait.. ~200 theorems in euc-geo?
idfk we had a lot
maybe 90
it was like 3 pages that we had photocopied from our book so we could refer to them

just for the two column thing?
right
don't worry about the words
focus on the structure
see how it's about an even mix of words and symbols?
that's from my sophomore year and I was still using a lot of symbols
im self-studying some geo concepts cut-out from our previous grade. Would u say it's necessary to learn the two column thing?
here's one from senior year, much more words and fewer symbols because i'd learned not to symbol barrage
two column is an okay way to structure a proof for beginners
and that sounds disparaging but i'm not trying to be
there are better ways, but the important part is that every step should be justified
by either a previous result or some axiom
i haven't really ever used it since geometry
so proofs should actually have more words
?
yeah
i sometimes put reasons to steps in solutions I do at problems, but idk if thats proving at all

that's good yeah!
all that proof is saying is that if i give you some number of dots you can draw little tiny circles around each one
lmao
even if those dots are on some wacko surface like you've drawn them on a Klein bottle or something
i've heard many times how challenging it is to discuss such to general audience
oh that's a good way to do it
"expand then equate coefficients" is a theme that will show up a lot
but do u think it's fine if i leave out learning two-columns rn?
if you're self-studying? yeah probably fine
am I just naturally bad in math or can I actually become good at it ?
you're not naturally bad at math what
i've seen what you're doing
neatness and practice
and collaboration
and some level of persistence and stubbornness
from your experience, where do u think would someone experience to actually prove in HS?
you'll go over some proofs in calculus
o
generally you're not expected to know them but they can be interesting
been thinking the same way ever since last year, and i'd agree with hayley
tbh in high school i was competition brained
ig i'll follow your words for now. tho im looking forward to proofs someday in the future (given enough time
)
so i just wanted to know how to do stuff not necessarily why it worked
and i wanted to be f a s t
oohh interesting
did it give you a positive feedback?
i think there are a lot of benefits to being able to do stuff quickly
like
have you taken algebra?
i did basic in 7th grade, and sucked at it, literally
Hayley
sorry, i don't mean to make this a grill session 
my point is just - the faster and smoother you are at each thing, and the less you have to think about the steps, the more you can focus on the next one
from realization when taking math more seriously, i thought it was coz i didnt paid much attention to why i did the stuff i do before
there are also a lot of problems with only focusing on what to do without understanding it
which i had to deal with when i went to college
i'd say u do the common step of isolating them, but i personally dont know the property why i do that, lmao
i was told that
so i think ideal is a balance
because if someone in e.g. calculus II looks at that equation and has to think about it for more than like two seconds before they know exactly what to do, they'll really struggle with the complicated shit that they're going over
like tbh, i started self-studying last year, like whatever concept i didnt know in school, i'd look into deeper whenever i have time, but just proceeded when i really couldnt get something and gets mentally frustrating
it can be, yeah
it's very rewarding to have your brain finally go clunk and you get it
but before then it's a lot of struggle
ikr!
i remember spending a day building intuition over basic combinatorics last month
good! yeah small practice is the way to go for combinatorics
and lots of things tbh
yeah i agree
ngl, i see similarities with your words to the guidance I followed before when doing math lmao
i'd say if you're struggling because you don't get the current concept that's a good place to be (it sucks to be there. i know)
if you're struggling because you do'n't understand the language they're using or the steps they're skipping over, then you may need to review or practice some things (which is also a sucky place to be)
i also never really understood a topic until about a year after i took the class, especially if i was teaching it to someone else
heck even in here as i was helping someone with differential equations (which I took uhhhhh a few years ago) something went clunk in my head
like two weeks ago lol
i completely relate, even rn
sometimes I feel the urge of giving up self studying coz i know i have limited time left but I have hard time getting smth
geometry, right? i'd say get a lot of scratch paper and maybe even some modeling clay
but ig i just believe that learning math wont hurt in the long run
you want multiple forms of instruction, not just reading
algebra actually
well the modeling clay can still help
as a stress ball if nothing else :P
during my algebra class
we had all these silly jingles for the formulas and rules we were learning
i did pretty well on geo (excluding proof stuff coz our school didnt teach us), but ig coz I could visualize the concepts better?
which dang it they're stuck in my head 15 years latr
yeah i remember relying on those
but when self stuyding, i figured that knowing the basic why's would also lead to some patterns of those things. but it's really time consuming for me
it can? but i don't think about the fact that 17 is prime, i just know it is
i'm also very competitive so self studying without a class to feel superior to wouldn't work for me
yeah i agree
thats interesting
are u in college?
not anymore
i got my masters a few years ago and didn't want to keep going for phd
oh wow, i didnt know u were that nerd

what did u take for masters?
CS but i was taking math through it
i taught a class on cryptography
that was a fun class
welp, u seem to enjoy math so thats pretty neat!
off topic: if i have a not-so-good alg background, should I go for graphs of linear equations and rely solely on geo knowledge?
hmm
when you're doing graphs of linear equations you'll probably need to be somewhat comfortable with equations like the one i wrote above and solving for variables
you can try a geometric approach
but the modern era is largely built on symbol manipulation
dang idek what those are
what could this be
im having hard time understanding graphing linear eqatuons with 2 variables. so im thinking i should study alg first before it
it would very much help i think yeah
i would struggle to teach someone who didn't feel at least somewhat familiar with algebra how to graph and analyze linear equations
the only algebra I got used to was those often used in hs geo
the rest, I planned to self study back from the beginning this coming week
so would u say it'd be better to skip it for now?
solving sets of equations with multiple variables is pretty important going forward but for now it really depends on what else you want to look at
Can anyone help?
but should equationf of a line and its forms be fine?
As far as I've seen every person who actively does math is struggling. Whether it's a elementary schooler or an undergraduate (I don't know about graduates but I assume that they are struggling too).
hey guys how do i find angles using trig?
and what’s the difference between sin and sin^-1?
With inverse trigonometry functions,
sin^-1 is the angle,
So for example,
sin^-1(sqrt(2)/2) = pi/4
While sin(pi/4) = sqrt(2)/2
sin^-1(opposite/hypotonuse) = angle
To use inverse trig functions to find the angle, you need to know the lengths of 2 sides of the triangle,
Wait, I’ll draw a picture,
So if you want to find angle x,
You need the lengths of A and B,
Or B and C,
Or A and C,
and how do i find it? sinx=b/a and then just cross multiply?
sin^-1 (or arcsin) is the opposite of sin. For example:
sin(30) = 0.5
sin(90) = 1
sin^-1(0.5) = 30
sin^-1(1) = 90
if you want to find angle you need to have any 2 of the 3 sides of triangle:
a = sin(x) = B / A
x = sin^-1(a)
a = cos(x) = C / A
x = cos^-1(a)
a = tan(x) = B / C
x = tan^-1(a)
a = cot(x) = C / B
x = cot^-1(a)
,tex .sohcahtoa
Akira
I wanna learn college level mathematics,chemistry and physics. I currently study using youtube(prof. Leonard-maths). Can some one please help me. If u can guide me with this it'll be a great help
Khan academy
seems like programmation
What do u know about diameter and radius?
Can I just treat 6cm as a base of a right angle triangle then use tan ?
Yeah
But for this you would use inverse trig operations
Los Angeles is located at (34°N, 118°W), and Osaka, Japan is at (34°N, 136°E). If a plane flies the great circle route from Osaka to Los Angeles, what is the highest latitude that the plane reaches during this flight?
bruh how do I do part C
here is thesolution which i don't understand without a diagram: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/4665352
what do you mean by perspective view?
guys
im confused
can someone help
<@&286206848099549185> do u know how to do this
I got 182.21
can we see your work?
wont it be cos
your in radians
wut that?
soh cah toa
ye
switch your calculator to degrees
alr
thats why your getting 182
alr thx @wind coral !
np
I got the answer now
im dumb nvm
all good dw
Guys
how do you derive the sum and product formulas
Like the SinA +SinB ones and then SinASinB ones cause I always forget them
@violet shadow Here's a proof of cosine product formula
In line 2 the cosine angle sum/difference identities are used
guys, one question. in those m+n.sin(a.x+b) functions, why does the b being positive deslocates the graphic to the left, and the b being negative deslocates the graphic to the right? wouldn't it be the opposite? in my head, the b being positive would have to deslocate the graphic to the right, since it is the positive side of the plane
is this silicon Valley highschool
@thin sentinel am at differentiation now 🗣️🗣️
yo
can anyone teach me basic trigonometry right now
i didnt pay attention in school for a week and im a little lost
sin cos tan bla bla bla i dont get it
look up a vid
no like derive it
as in if you forgot what the formula was sort of thing
yo guys should i study proofs, or should i do that when I actually need it in school. i like being ahead of things like this but idk how important proofs are
How do I find the length of a chord without an angle
is the only way using the chord formula?
depends what other info you're given
midpoint of chord, centre and radius
so the chord formula works but is that the only way
wdym by midpoint of chord
oh
as in you're given coordinates of the midpoint and centre?
what's this "chord formula" you're referring to?
no clue
Ive worked it out just can't work out why its 2*sqrt (r^2 - d^2)
why minus when pythagoras is +
you don't know the chord formula you keep referencing?
pythag gives the relation between the three sides of a right triangle
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
with hypot c and legs a,b
which one yuo solve for depends on what you're given
solving for an unknown leg
a^2 = c^2 - b^2
a = sqrt(c^2 - b^2)
my books assume all this knowledge and while I know the pythag theorem ive not used it in years
ive just been being stupid
makes sense now I actually drew the circle lol
Math assumes previous things you learnt when you learn anything new
Also btw do remember pythagorean theorem you'll need it for highschool and even university calculus at the very beginning
I need help! How do I do this without a Calculator. I know how to find The degrees that’s easy but I don’t know how to find the sides without using a calculator
Image?
Opposite/hypotenuse
Yep so sin(25)=0.4=opp/hyp
We have a side length already
Is that side the opp, adj, or hyp?
Opp
Yep, so sub In 8 for opp here
Do you see where this is going?
I know the formula for it
I guess don’t know how to solve it without without a calculator
Well what did you get when. You subbed in 8 for opp?
Sin(25)=8/hyp
Then hyp•sin(25)=8
Then I divide it so I get 8/sin(25)
And then I get stuck
Ohhhh now I get it
Sin(25)=.4
Ty
do u guys have tricks to memorising exact trig values in radians
yeah I'm good with it lol, just forgot about using it. 5 years ago was highschool for me
obvs use it to find distance and polar coordinates and stuff but my knowledge has become a case of using software to do stuff for me and not doing it myself
that is sorta what its like post university anyway, but the knowledge is still important for troubleshooting and understanding
i did 5
is it correct
for #5
someone told me to use (x,y)->(-y,x) instead of (x,y)->(y,-x)
nvm
fixed the problem
That's the most approximate trig table I've ever seen.
minus is better lmao
If i'm using real coordinate space, do i just treat time just like i would treat any spatial axis? I've seen (x,y,z,t) being used to represent coordinates and stuff like that, but i'm just not good at this type of stuff
Use the same method I told you before. You can find c using Pythagoras. Then use trig ratios to find a or b
What channels can I watch to teach myself geometry and are centroids involved in geometry
Is there a quick way to find the equation of a circle with 3 points?
how to prove Guldinus theorem in a simple way(plz
In mathematics, Pappus's centroid theorem (also known as the Guldinus theorem, Pappus–Guldinus theorem or Pappus's theorem) is either of two related theorems dealing with the surface areas and volumes of surfaces and solids of revolution.
The theorems are attributed to Pappus of Alexandria and Paul Guldin. Pappus's statement of this theorem app...
this?
@shell sleet is this what you're talking about?
Hi, what's the proof that the circle is the shape with the most area in relation to it's perimeter? just a thought that came across my mind today
isoperimetric inequality
yes thank u
or at least when n=2
If you did the steps of the proof backwards (from the bottom line up) it is a derivation. But not an obvious one, it would be very difficult to know what to do next without already somewhat remembering what the formula was
Probably easier to memorize the formula, and then if you’re unsure, try to rewrite it as sin(a)cos(b) to check if you remembered correctly
Hello people, I need help once again. I know how to do (a) and (b) but I’m stuck on (c) and (d)
have you drawn a diagram
its pretty much just interpreting the table again
which gives the relation between the function,ratio and angle
supposedly the ratio you'd get would be in the column of the appropraite trig function and you can get the angle from that
Oh I see because I divided 22/20 and I got 1.1
Which matches with 65 degrees
Going back to this one again I know the answer for (b) but which is a=55 b=35 but how do I know which one is which
Like how to do that a=55 and not 35 and Vice versa
well we can find angle a using tan. tan(A) is equal to opp/adj correct? we know opp=10 and adj=7, so we can sub those values in for opp/adj getting us tan(A)=10/7. the decimal representation of 10/7 is approx 1.43. so tan(A)=1.43. you can use the table to figure out the rest im sure.
$(874\cdot\frac{w}{2}+x\cdot y\cdot22^{4}+z)$
Dmahonjr06
$874\cdot\0.5+234256xy+z$
Dmahonjr06
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
$437+702768y+z)$
Dmahonjr06
Dmahonjr06
If you know that the diameter of the sun is 864,000 miles and the diameter of the moon is 2160 miles. What is the maximum distance that the moon can be from earth for a total solar eclipse to happen when the sun itself is at its maximum distance, that being 94,500,000 miles?
If someone can works this and give me their answer it would be appreciated
i have an answer that looks good, but i want to know if others also get it
the book gives problem, but does not tell answer
I got less than or equal to 236250 miles
The second picture isn't related to geometry and trigonometry
It's calculus
can you help me with my question please?
just send it, also dont ask specific people for help.
its just above her message...
oh i did not see it
Wrong
Akira it is the same trigonometric series
Unfortunately English is my 4th language so I don't think I'm able to understand that question 😛
Word problems I mean
Oh cool thing but you know what
I've never learned something like this in high school Canada 
They teach that in early university
This could be complex analysis based in Canada
But I'm pretty sure it's calculus
But its a good thing
just step by step
the torment arghhh
maybe i could forgo some details of this topic
and focus on scoring well for the rest of the topics
it's good practice
there’s stats and mechanics angwayyy
back
@thin sentinel
what do you think of these stats & mechanics topics? which are the difficult ones?

yeap am gonna try it again later
this the year 1 content
Do you wanan vc about it
this the year 2
If you asked types questions like that to your math teacher in high school, they'll get mad at you 💀
Its not fair can i dm u tho
hi guys after 9 months of euclidean geometry autodidact im here to ask something
how is possible that Euclid proved his own theorem with constructions
i mean how can a mathematician say with only the insight "i think that if i do that construction it works"
for constructions i mean building segments, parallel lines, median and etc...
i can say that's not the kind of constructions that im talking about
and u did not answer my question
but i doubt that u can answer to that
15a. || 75j is the velocity vector and it will take 4000 seconds|| I guess
What's the formula to find the height of this?
H=3
how do u do that in a square?
he asked the formula
I didn't want the height
don't give him unless he wants the solution
Then pitago drip
I just didn't know the formula
how do u find a diagonal of a square? u know atleast that?
i can help wait
I'm fine
Use pitago 2 times
How do you find the length of the other sides of a right triangle if you are only given an angle and a side that is not the hypotenuse?
yeah, use trig functions
That's the thing, im only starting out with the basics and im pretty sure there is a way to solve this but I don't know how
No? But im guessing you have to plug a and theta into cos
Yeah, that's what im learning
ok, do you know what it means?
But you can't just use an angle and one side to find the missing side in a trig function, right?
you can
Yep
How then?
so sin(x)=opp/hyp, cos(x)=adj/hyp, and tan(x)=opp/adj
currently we want to find b correct?
what side is b, opp, or hyp?
Opp
Sin
are you guessing?
Nope
refer back to this
Its tan is it?
yeah, can you tell me why?
Since its toa, tan(x) = adj / opp
yep, now lets move one to the second step
sub in the values we currently know
we know x is pi/3
tan is opp/adj
Oh right, forgot we actually gave the opp a name
So tan (pi/3) = b / 1
And since its b / 1, we can just do b
Now what?
Sqrt of 3
yep
But how did tan(pi/3) get that value?
youll learn that when you get further into trig
for now just put it into the calculator
you should keep it as sqrt3
decimals are hard to work with
so we have the value of the legs correct?
Yep
we can use pythag now
Alright
to find the hypotenuse
C is then 2
Alright, so this is how trig works
pretty much
What now?
Problem in finding area of intersecting circles with same radius that cross through each other’s origin, my answer looks a bit to complicated to be right, someone double check it?
It has a pi, a 6, and a square root of 3, that looks good enough to me.
One approach could be to find the side length of the outer hexagon by using the law of cosines on one of the small white triangles.
Another would be to make six copies of the small hexagon, glue one of them onto each side of the original small hexagon, and work how how much the area of the resulting shape differs from the large hexagon.
it should be nearly 7:1
applying law of cosines, and the formula for the area of a hexagon
yes thats right
a few people certainly do know the answer, but we don't give those out here.
help pls
so <1 =70-4x and <2=18x-4. And both of them combined should equal 90 degrees.
i set the equation up so it equals 45
so gotta solve the equation (70-4x)+(18x-4)=90 to get x and then add them to each angles and ur done
🫡
👌
oh this one is a little bit tricky
so you know that a triangle is 180 degrees
yes
i got teh answer88
i triple checked
Alternatively, sum of angles in quadrilateral:
120 + x + 64 + x = 360
Ah, thank you!
Is this a test?
.
Ok, use the fact that angle xyz is an included angle
Is an inscribed angle* srry bout that
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
mb
all good, saying "two time the inscribed angle" is fine though
oh ok
but let the helpee figure out the arc themselves
okok
please help
If KL = 30, LM = 18, MN = 13, then NO = (Blank 1). (Round your answer to one decimal place, if necessary.)
Is this a test
Ml times mk equals mn times mo
bruh i did that ik the formula for secant this and all but could u like show me how to do it step by step
I feel as if I am doing it wrong
ngl It doesn look like a test related qeustion to help you out on what's going to be on the test
What is the arc length and why is it important in the circular trig functions?
have you guys ever faced a trigonometry limit before where the function is a trig function divided by some angle
for instance:
$$ \lim_{x \to \frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{1-\sin(x)}{x - \frac{\pi}{2}}$$
Lyerix
it's kinda annoying solving these problems
no L'Hopital
do you want the solution?
it'd be 0, using L'Hôpital
But I don't want to use that rule, neither would my teacher want me to. I just want to know what is your solution towards this problem besides using LH rule
change sinx to cos(pi/2 - x)
ohh ok, I see where this will be going
then you can make that form
(1-cosx)/x^2
but here x will be (pi/2 - x)
and it tends to 0
so it is applicable
how is the ^2 there
where
you need to multiply and divide the expression by (pi/2 -x)
what will this tends to anyway if x → 0?
I know only the sinx/x would tend to 1 when x tends to 0
1/2
therefore this would be 1/2 ⋅ 0?
yup
alright understandable, very much great and simple solution than the other one my classmates had
what's this process called anyway?
sorry for mentioning, I forgot to turn it off
no worries, ig they are called reduction formulas in trigonometry, not sure
and always try to manipulate your problem in such a way, that it forms a limit that you know
How did she find this angle was 90?
By the vertical angles theorem you get that the angle GHE is 90 degrees and by the linear pair theorem you get that that the angle CHG is 90 degrees.



