#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 15 of 1
i'd recommend editing those labels, content here should be safe for work
Whats been the coolest thing you guys have picked up form trig?
and also these triangles can't be congruent
why not?
pay close attention to which sides are congruent
It seems like both marked sides have different sized angles opposite them
So no one can help with this?
how would u use euler's identity to derive the half angle formulas? Or is that possible?
Once you derive double angle formula for cos, you turn it into the half angle formula
.
Wait... how?
Although im not sure if you're even able to obtain this using euler's identity, but above you said you did
turns out this is possible
so just replace x with x/2
cos(2 (x/2)) = 1 - 2sin^2 (x/2)
cos (x) = 1 - 2sin^2 (x/2)
then rearrange
half angle formula is just double angle formula in disguise lol
ah
can someone make me formula for this please? (i am not making torpedo or any ilegal stuff if you wanna know)
@everyone
simple question but does sin(2pi x/z) < sin(2pi y/z) follow immediately if x < y < z
No, consider x=1, y=2, z=4.
ah
as part of a problem i have to show the following
For $1 \leq j_1 < j_2 \leq n$, show that $e^{2\pi i \frac{j_1}{n}} \neq e^{2\pi i \frac{j_2}{n}}$
not sebbb not stμ₂dying
I'd observe that e^it is injective on t in (0,2pi].
A rigorous proof could divide into cases on < or > pi (which can be distinguished by the sign of the imaginary part), and then within each of those cases the sine is monotonic.

i was gonna argue by desmos
like is it not apparent from the period of cos and sine
It is mathcrime if your school never show you this
also the best way to proof
for some reason i see strange proofs with cosine theorem (extended pythagorean) and distances
strange textbooks 
geometry dash
This one image taught me more trigonometry than my high school teacher did in an entire year.

what do yall call this in english
ive been asking around for a while now but to no avail
Wdym in english?
Would anyone mind clarifying the ambiguous triangle case? I can do the problems and I’d say I would get it right 90% of the time but I don’t understand it all the way just yet
as in is there an english name to this theorem
Those are just some results obtained via Pythagoras Theorem, don't think you need to know a name for those
Well, Pythagoras Theorem and Similarity
Hello. Can someone help me with this exercise? It's Affine Geometry, 1st year.
do you have any progress so far?
Not really
But a friend will help me. I can send the solution in a couple of hours if you want.
I wanted to solve by then
okay so
wait
do you still want to get help from here or are you relying on your friend
if you want to get help from here: i would start by finding the intersection points of the lines mentioned
yes. if you can and know how to solve it, you can give me some hints or put the solution here.
Thank you!
i won't give you the solution in full
because that isn't how this server works
however i can give you pointers, and i've already given you one.
now it's your job to follow up on it
okay, sorry for the delay on my part
(-2, 2) lies on both S and S'
so yes @lucid shuttle so far so good
if i have 3 vertices that form a triangle, is there a simpler formula to find the area of the triangle other than this
If the vertices are (A,B),(C,D),(E,F)
, then the area is
12det∣∣∣∣ACEBDF111∣∣∣∣
let me put that out of laTeX
note the answer is determinant form
how to calculate all angle using directional cosine
Oh my god
I’ve realized
I’ve made graphs for trig of all kinds
But never have I done so in a 3D space
Dot product
But this proof is not complete (alpha, beta assumed acute, and so is their sum; it relies on geometry)
For any alpha, beta, and alpha + beta < pi/2 there is this proof
This is for the addition case
OHH
i’m on the same task as you
i’m trying to graph the complex results of the arcsin function but i can’t find a 3D grapher
Is anyone ok with dming me and like helping me with really basic trigonometry
Im just getting started
Sin of what is root 2 over 3
thanks
Oh wait its okay i got it
No it ain’t

Also is that supposed to be a factorial
Oh, that’s interesting
you might see these too in math: & for AND, | for OR
Yeah, there should be a more clearer interpretation of the two
wikipedia says it came from english math school
and also that they havent became very popular
arcfunctions win

yeah, but i sure it is possible to make something similar for any angle 
also interesting
textbook has no derivatives
oh, the whole thing isnt like that
looks like some lighter proof/explanation used
Why aren't vectors and matrices generally taught at this level? The students might have sufficient geometric and algebraic knowledge and students can intuitively grasp the basic concepts through time. I believe it would vastly help future linear algebra courses.
funny thing is when you learn calculus after it becomes useful a lot
like, you first learn how things accelerate etc
without propper math base
sad people have to memmorize all formulas and suffer from not understanding why things work that way
while i can just
meow, distance travelled with given v(t)? (sounds of area under curve being calculated)
The inscribed triangles are similar to the circumscribed triangles
Geometric mean theorem
Is this right
Don't you need the perimeter or side length to calculate the area?
Yes I did that
What is the side length then
Cuz it's not given in the question
How did you find it?
Using the apothem and tan
To find the base of half of the pentagon’s base
Then 2x
Alright
If the side length is really 14.6 then yes the area is 365units
Anyone able to help. This is exam prep
I'm trying to solve so gimme a out 5-7min
I think it is
Well it is quite a difficult problem. However after producing KM, ABKC is a parallelogram cuz diagonals are bisected
I got that
I got a relation between ac and ab
AC/sin(alpha) = AB/sin(beta)
= 2m/sin(angle ACK)
And angle ACK = angle ABK
We have to find AC and AB in terms of alpha, beta and m right?
Geogebra can do 3D graphs
Not sure how good it is tho as it’s the only one I’ve used
can i have the link in my dm?

anyone able to study trig?
1357 anyone?
Can someone help me find x
whats the sum of 2 directed angles
(OI;OM)+(OI;ON)
OI OM and ON are vectors
illustration:
Now that I think of it.... how do we define discs (ovals)? Was pondering this since definition of a circle was rather straightforward, but how would we define discs such that we can discern it from any other geometric shape?
Hey guys. I'm entering geometry next year. Would anyone like to help me get started with learning ahead tomorrow?
If you are talking about ellipses there are two points called foci, where if you add their distances from any point on the ellipse together it will remain constant.
Why did you respond so fast
Trade secret 
It has been 3 hours since you posted that
How long were you pondering this
It’s like me tryna sleep
My brains just like oh I wonder
Minutes, because my brain doesn't really care much about geometry and would rather ponder over analysis
But the question keeps popping back at times

Well, there you go
thanks
Place midpoints D on AC, E on CB and F on BA. This way you'll be able to trigger Ceva's theorem
"Angles given by the ratios of the trigonometric functions"
You should memorise 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, 180°, 270° and 360°
I have a great resource for memorising these values
oh that's nice
For values >90, you can use the graph and the values you have already
actually, very nice
the function keeps repeating after one "slide" so to call it
This is how I remember it, when the point moves the trig functions values changes accordingly, and it also tells when a particular trig function is not defined for example tan(x) is not defined when x = 90° more generally, (2n-1)×90°; n is integer. I infer a lot more info than this from this particular image.
Well, this image shows how these functions change when the point travels the unit circle accordingly
Moreover, it also includes the secans and cosecans functions
Let ABC be an acute-angled triangle
with A = 60◦
. Let E, F be the feet of altitudes through B, C respectively. Prove
that CE − BF =3/2*(AC-AB)
Can anyone hel;p
havin a real hard time gettin good
at eometry just never have any decent ideas
Would someone mind helping me understand the first step of this verification?
I'm not sure how they reach this point in a single step, or more importantly how I am to know that I want to get here without a lot more experience and experimentation than can be afforded in the time i have
You could reach that conclusion without the natural log, then simply apply ln on both sides
Nvm you changed your question
Yeah sorry, i realized i worded it incorrectly lol
its really two questions, I don't know how to get cscx-cotx to end up in that form, then the second question is even if I did, how can I know i need too?
theres a bunch of options to transform the expression, but only one leads me to this point
Alright so you know csc²x - cot²x = 1 right
yes
You could simplify this as (cscx + cotx) (cscx - cotx) = 1
i think i may know where you're going
yeah it's the reciprocal?
Yeah, or you could reach to this conclusion by dividing both sides by any one of the expressions here
Sry my phone died
So that's one part of the problem dealt with
no problem
Now, the question is asking you to prove ln(cscx - cotx) = -ln (cscx + cotx)
As you can see, the expression you need to reach includes cscx + cotx
But you're starting with cscx - cotx
What way do you know of expressing cscx - cotx as csc x + cotx?
the negative reciprocal of csc x - cot x,
so -1/csc x - cot x = csc x + cot x
Well that's one way, or you could simply start with cscx - cotx = 1/(cscx + cotx) and proceed from there
But no, it's not a negative reciprocal of csc x - cot x
csc²x - cot²x = 1
(csc x + cot x)×(csc x - cot x) = 1
csc x - cot x = 1/(csc x + cotx)
There's no negative sign involved here
Once you get to this point, the going gets easy
yeah you're correct, I forgot that something raised to -1 is the same as it's reciprocal.
So when we get to ln[1/csc x + cot x] we can rewrite it to:
ln[csc x + cot x]^-1
which can be rewritten as:
-ln[csc x + cot x]
There you go
I can feel my brain warming up lol No idea why this one stumped me for so long its really simple in hindsight.
I think its because this is my third week of learning trig concepts and this is the first question they've asked that included thinking about regular algebra again
One thing to keep in mind is that if you can express a in terms of b, and the proof is asking for the result in terms of b, it's advisable to express a in terms of b
If that makes sense
im not sure it does lol
Say, A = B + 4
and the RHS in the question/proof includes B instead of A, it's better to express A as B + 4
This is pretty obvious, but you'll see what I mean when you do similar questions like this one
You started with csc x - cot x, but the proof demanded a result in csc x + cot x, so it was better to express csc x - cot x as 1/(csc x + cot x)
yeah, I think the issue was that I just straight up didn't even think of taking the reciprocal. Also, now that I get it
I don't really understand why they chose to take such a roundabout way in the solution
They would not have been able to show the first step unless they had already showed ln(1/csc x + cot x)
then they spend several steps demonstrating a phytagrious identity to get back to 1
Anyway, thanks for the help
Join AO, BO and CO
Since arcAB = arcAC, angleAOB = angleAOC, thus AB = AC (equal cords subtend equal angles at the centre)
@upper karma
O is the centre
What's that RO in the centre
Ah, my bad, I thought it's the centre
can (1+tan)/(1-tan) be simplified as -1, or am i just dumb
It can't
What made u think so?
I don't know to be honest. I haven't really been focusing recently and i was just told by somebody else that I told them it was correct
I was pretty sure it couldn't have been simplified fruther, much less to -1, I just wasn't sure why I would tell somebody else that or if i was just misunderstood
You're right
Simply do it your way, you reached the answer in 2 steps, that's enough
It also shows good thinking on your part
hey can anyone help me estimate the function of a graph: i need to know the function of the red graph (the green one is just e^x) technically i know every point which is one this graph
$x/(x-1/2)$
Daniel S.
That’s what I think it is
Vertical asmyptote at x=.5
and a horizontal asymptote at y=1
its close but not the same
i tried changing some of the parameters and still doesnt match up
i played around with trig functions in the exponent. If you have a constant times x^sin(ax) (a->∞) then you get some graph looking like a surface. This surface can when using lnx as your constant enclosed by lnx and -lnx. In the end i try to find a patern for the function enclosing this "surface"
Can anyone help with this?
Sorry man. Idk matlab. If it were some other language I would have been able to help
It's probably doesn't matter if its matlab or not, its just finding angle beta shown in the code and where it is on the diagram
Ig. But still a bit too complicated for me.
So far, heroes formula and the geometric proof
heron's formula*
Never heard of it
Goood Morning Everyone!! 😀
it states that the area of a triangle can be given by:
where a and b and c are different sides of a triangle
Is that how the area formula is derived? A= 1/2 bh
not quite, this formula was derived after that formula came to existence
Ooo, I remember using this during math history class years ago. Used to approximate the area of a triangle? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Not only approximate, it gives the exact area
help-22
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
For this assignment could I use desmos and put y = cot x and y = csc x and then draw on these graphs what shows on desmos?
prove that the angle is the same
A chord is 22 cm long. It is 60 cm from the center of the circle. What is the radius of the circle? Could I have help for this?
Well, draw it out
Thank you :)
Who can help me in pythagorean theorem
Its just 1 question tho
Oh thank you
What should i do if theres a square root
@everyone
But im getting the length
have you learnt the special triangles
Special triangles?
like the 30-60-90 triangles, right isoceles, etc
ohhh ok
Oh i forgot we learned special triangles
Ah
Sorry bout that folks
np
You can connect one of the chord ends to the centre
and use pythagorean
hi, i am new to the trigonometrie and i want to learn more about that stuff so can one of you recommend a free online book for this purpose
how do i start trigonometrie
how do i trigonometrie
How do I spelly trigonmetrieei collectrty
why use this formula instead of A = 1/2 bh
nvm figured it out
Guys I have a question but I don't think it's worth taking a math help for
Photomath said u can combine two solutions into one
Does anyone know how I do this
Or am I not supposed to ask this in here
I mean it is geometry
Well, they're within the same set like
They'll just overlap
It's more by analysis than raw algebra
Yeah i just kinda dont understand how it got to that final x=
I mean the way i see it if i count both those answers up and divide them by their most common factor (4) i can get to the answer down there
I got this assignment and I know how to find the other trig functions but can someone explain to me if/why the quadrants they’re in matter?
because the quadrants determine the sign of trig functions, in simple terms
We were taught it as the CAST rule, which means certain trigonometric functions are positive/negative in certain quadrants
I have some clue on how to find far south and far east for group a but cannot find out how to solve for group b
oh ok if I find the other trig functions they would be negative or positive depending on the quadrant?
yes
ok thank you!!
in this simplification, where does the3sqrt2^2 and -sqrt2^2 come from on the bottom?
fricking rotating conics man
Let ABC be a triangle with incenter O. Given that the area of triangle AOC is 2, the area of triangle COB is 3, and the area of triangle AOB 4, find AB, BC, and AC.
Anyone have an idea?
/imagine Pell's equation
Guys ı Need fast help
How many times √15 is the perimeter of a triangle with heights 15, 20, and 30
Any idea to solve it?
this is not an AI art server.
so the grid.. is it detailed...i mean is it just the blocks or does it have more division inside the cube?
As u can see it cuts the squares and generate different lengths
Can someone help with this Geometry problem? It is under the section Other angles where 2 chords are 1/2 the sum of the intercepted arcs
I have an intriguing problem that I wonder if y'all would know how to solve.
I want to place 2 circles inside of a triangle using only a compass and straightedge such that they both fall on the midline of the triangle, one touches 2 sides of the triangle, the other touches the remaining side, and both circles are the same size. I attached an image in case my description doesn't make sense
is the triangle equilateral or just isosceles
Equilateral
that makes it easier at least, idk I'm starting by writing some equations for things just to find points of intersections since ultimately we just need to construct the centers of these circles and we can easily construct the midline
x^2+(y-a)^2=a^2 and x^2+(y-3a)^2=a^2 for instance, make a line to represent a triangle with unit side lengths to find the tangent point etc
there may be some super elegant solution that doesn't require grinding through this grunt work lol
but I think it's probably best to just roll up our sleeves and get it over with
I did some experimenting in geogebra and apparently if I divide the midline into 5ths, the first 2 segments make up one circle while the next 2 segments make up the second and the 5th segment is outside the circles
this is possibly the oddest pattern I've ever seen and I have no idea how to prove it
Is this true for all triangles?
I have no idea. not likley, probably just equilateral
use one of the available help channels
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
yes
because if you draw a line here
the centre of that circle is now the what's it called
the
CENTROID
yes
and that's 2/3 the way from one vertex to the midpoint of the opposing side
so it's 2 + 1 + 2 from the other circle
= 5
isnt the centroid where all 3 midlines intersect?
that, annoyingly, is not the centroid
it is if it's an equilateral triangle
no
C1 is the centroid of the partial triangle I indicated with my line
you can divide the midline into 5ths I t h i n k ?
I'm pretty sure I could, but that is one heck of a grueling process
not really
its not 👀
first step
(CB is the midline)
so as you can see I constructed a segment parallel to CB
I will now be using that
now use that segment to make 4 more equal copies of itself on the line
ohhh I see why my way is so difficult. I started with the triangle and put the circles inside, requiring me to use thames theorem to break the midline into 5ths
your way makes much more sense
and finally this
so as you can see it's clearly not a hassle
in any way shape or form
/sarcasm
I am not good at geometry but construction 💯
All of that for one alchemy circle
:0
Can anyone help me make sense of these? Im unable to get the conditions imposed on x and y. Is there a shortcut ?
Can someone help me understand this?
$tan^{-1}(\frac{4}{3})$
Bandera
Looks like you did 4/5 (which would give sin V) instead of 4/3

Alright thank you 🙏
i don't know how
I need help
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
@upper karma!help
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
I NEED HELP
Did you read #❓how-to-get-help
no
k
@faint agate looks like a bunch of u-substitution, properties of even and odd functions and piecewise functions
there's a video on the right corner
hi, I have this one problem from my homework that I don't understand. Even if I check the right answer, I don't understand where I failed.
" 2tan2(x-π/4) ≤ 2√3 "
@echo karma do you know how to find the area of a parallelogram?
A parallelogram is just a skewed rectangle
i have a question what year level or grade level you start geometry?
7th grade
probably depends on where you're from
For me it’s 10 grade bruh
But yea it depends
rlly i am doing geometry at year 5 bruh
<@&268886789983436800>
Yea I think I kinda got it yesterday one guy spent a lot of time explaning it to me, Im gonna solve questions related to it today
- What are the given?
- What condition/s is appropriate to solve the problem?
3 why are you using that condition? Explain and justify. - Explain your solution.
- Give your conclusion.
- What type of person os Alice? What values does she have?
- Do you see yourself as the reflection of alice?
Can somebody help me with this to how to explain please
<@&268886789983436800> year 5 is ages 9 to 10, therefore this person is under 13
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
@meager sundial
and yet.
i saw that.
i can put in a word for you.
<@&268886789983436800> ?
@calm hazel try using the Pythagoras theorem to find the following
or try using the proportionality equivalence
@calm hazel Use the Pythagorean Theorem to find AC and VX. Then find the scale factor, using AC to DE, to find the remaining sides.
Use similarity rules
Any 2 SIMILAR shapes have sides that change with the SAME RATIO
I randomly came up with a construction problem which actually felt pretty inetersting.
Given a point A and two parallel lines b and c, such that all three do not coincide, construct an equilateral triangle ABC such that B is on line b and C is on line c
yeah just regular compass-straightedge rules
that follows euclids axioms
But I took shortcuts using geogebra
yes
im assuming you used circles?
yes

bet
This option
oh i see, could you do it without that?
yeah
bet
I forget the rule, but it can be done
you can chain circles
yeah it's been a while
but they have to be in specific spots and there are positions you cant necessarily reach all the time
@ me when you send it
@runic pawn
thanks
very interesting

why did Pythagoras come and make up crap like this
I found a much faster and easier construction
lets see it
Initial problem
hmm I may have made a mistake somewhere
I marked the wrong side of the blue circle
One of the purple triangles will be equilateral. Which one exactly depends on initial placements
The solution generalizes nicely to non-parallel lines
thats pretty cool
It is
I would say find the area of the closest rectangle and triangle, then compare it to the actual area
you realize everyone pings are turned off on this 100k+ strong server for a reason right
Would have to say triangle
Yeah this isn’t really a math question
hello
Hi
okay so i missed a day of class and they had gone over a completely new subject
can anybody explain to me how to do this?
i really only need an explanation for the first one—i think i could figure out the others
(please ping me, too! I'm working on other things as well)
To figure out the first one, create an equilateral triangle of side length 1, then draw a bisector through one of its sides.
thank you!!
I didn't realize that these also had to do with the unit circle😭 that's my bad
Can someone help me with the rest I already did the first steps
@upper karma Yea bro I gotcha basically u just gotta plug in the y and x coordinates into ur new equation. Like for the first one u gotta do y = -(1/2)x + b, so it would be 3 = (-1/2)(-5) +b. Then solve for b. Tada new equation. Then u graph both
The perpendicular slope would be the negative reciprocal meaning what do you need to multiply m by to get -1
Then find the perpendicular slope and use the point-slope formula: y - y1 = m(x - x1)
For the first question you found the perpendicular slope: -1/2
Use the perpendicular slope in the point slope formula and use the point (-5, 3) in the point-slope formula
It would be y - 3 = -1/2 (x + 5)
Simplify from there
Hi everyone! Kind of a multipost but... does anyone have any good resources about circles? A resource that is from high school geometry or aligned with the AMC8 is really what I am looking for.
I just want to make this topic about circles really intuitive for me since I am learning it right now and I am taking the AMC8!! Thanks in advance ❤️
Ty all
i mean for the most part in my experience but there are some things u have to learn on ur own that isnt taught in hs
yea idk how bad us schools are
if they are worse than i thought then u prolly have to learn some stuff by urseld
lmfao yea true
Post in chill not here smh
its geometry
this is not the place to troll
Would anyone mind giving me the equation on how to find the central angle?
Area of sector = πr^2 x ∅/360°
4π = πr^2 • x/360
If you know the radius you can use this equation
Radius is 6inches?
don't use the empty set symbol as a substitute for theta.
Oh right.
My bad
I'm on my phone and that somewhat resembled theta
I didn't realise I was using the wrong symbol
Accidentally used phi 😂
this isn't phi either
I'm pretty sure the empty set symbol is phi (pronounced fai)
You're wrong then.
You know, you could correct me rather than simply telling me I'm wrong
we were taught it as phi in school
The empty set symbol was introduced in Bourbaki's set theory volume, and the responsible author, André Weil, is on record saying it is taken from letter Ø used in Norwegian (and Danish).
Ø is a vowel completely unrelated to the Greek consonant phi.
well, we're being taught it as phi in school so ig the schools don't really care
What can I say other than your school teaches you falsehoods?
https://jeff560.tripod.com/set.html gives the relevant quote from Weil.
fair
Actually the typographical shape of the empty-set symbol is closer to what is used to represent "diameter" in engineering than it is to an actual letter Ø, but the origin appears to be the Ø.
Seems like phi
Neither of those look like an empty-set symbol.
Neither of those look like an empty-set symbol.
What do you say about this? @grave pond
$\varnothing$ is not $\phi$ or $\varphi$ or $\Phi$, or even {\O}, though it it historically derives from the latter.
Troposphere
I say that the last sentence of that is plainly wrong.
Cube ABCD.A'B'C'D'. Vecto AB equals vecto a, vecto AD equals vecto b, vecto AA' equals vecto c. Demonstrate vecto AC, vecto B'D', vecto BD', vecto DB', vecto BC' and vecto AD' according to vecto a, vecto b and vecto c.
Hi there, would anyone perhaps know how to find the area of such a complex shape in terms of r?
null set , no solutions
thanks for mansplaining.
if you want a cheap substitute for theta, just use the letter t assuming that isn't already used elsewhere
ohk. thx
hey ash
Quick question, for this I tried doing cos = 21/29 and I got 0.72 but it said it was wrong. Is there something I missed?
you are not asked for theta itself but just for cos(θ)
you have correctly identified that cos(θ) = 21/29
wait no nevermind
i thought you had taken the arccos or something but thats 0.76
,calc 21/29
Result:
0.72413793103448
... this does round to 0.72. the fuck?
@vagrant ore do you have limited attempts on this thing
No not limited but if I get it wrong it docks points
maybe it didn't like the format you entered it in? maybe it wanted one of .72 or 0.72 but not the other, or you left a space at the end of it or something.
do you get an error message of any kind
Hm possibly I’ll try it.
No error message
The question before it was to find the sin of this same thing and I got 0.76 for that but that said it was wrong too
So I just skipped that question
It must have just been the format because I logged back in and put in 0.72 and it went through
what is the area of the circle
Science rules
Can anybody tell me how to solve inverse trig functions(sin inverse, tan inverse, cos inverse) without a calculator but by hand?
depends
What is the formula for the distance of a point from a line when the information provided is the equation of the line in symmetric form and the coordinates of the point?
--> Shortest distance between a line and a point is their perpendicular distance (i.e. the line you draw passing through the point and intersecting the original line is perpendicular to the equation)
So:
- Find the slope of the equation from the symmetric form of the equation, and thus the slope of the intersecting line (their slopes multiplied = -1)
--> So you have the incomplete symmetric form of the intersecting line (i.e. y=ax+c, where a is known) - Substitute the coordinates of the point into the incomplete symmetric form, and you obtain c
- Do simultaneous equations of the equation obtained with the original equation, and you get the perpendicular distance between the line and the point/required answer
- Distance formula
'd be something like this if my working is correct. But you get the general method
is it 25
Before electronic calculators, you looked up the values in printed tables. Computing those tables by hand in the first place would have taken years or sometimes decades of work for someone
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Please I nead help with geometry problem
I found all angles except EDC and ECD and I need ECD
I got a question
how did you find 70? in E
except DCE and EDC
okay so I think if you subtract 180 - 70 you'll get 110 for angle C
also where did 50 come from
All angles on the photo are from the problem
What?
no wait it should be 45 degrees for C
there's a lot of parts for angles that i remember though
for angle c should be 45 and then after that 180 - 70 - 45 = 65
for angle D
So it is not a isosceles?
how do you know it's an isoceles?
as for me if it's an isosceles then the angle c should be 30 degrees
Uh hi I have question
How would u solve these
@frozen ocean
basically I have no idea about this because in canada our teacher never taught us like these ones
you could ask help in help channels
@upper karma does this works or still confusing
Ok thx
np and welcome here
Yeah it ist
oh
then what supposed to be?
a lot of math teachers in Canada told me if you always see an isoceles angle, it could be one of these degrees: 30, 35, and 45, which sometimes confuse people

I found it
okay
Hint: ||try to prove that MA=MB=MC=MD||
#help-34
Could someone please recommend me a really good geometry book(Euclidean geometry)
Oh, I know how to do all that with a calculator but thought it would be possible by hand, like there would be some formula
yk asians
Excuse me what?
Asian stereotypes:
????
What I mean is that Asians aren't allowed to use a calculator. An example would be if someone is from India, for the general CBSE curriculum, you can't use calculators at all.
I doubt you're allowed to use calculators in higher level exams in the US either
We're not allowed in class, or exams, or anywhere, it's prohibited
What exactly do you mean by higher level?
wassup anybody here?
np
has nothing to do with people being asian
its just practice
like multiplying 2 3-digit numbers
or if youre having trouble with that, start with 1-digit then 2-digit
or calcukate powers
like
try to get to 2^20
or 2^25
in your head
or 3^10
oh trig values
idk
you can derive 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 ... degrees
Bro what 💀
Some asians are stupid to no offense to Asian people, but race doesn’t determine who’s good at what
I’ve seen for god sakes black people getting a 99 in math again, no offense to black people, but if you work hard you’ll be fine
ik. You misunderstood what I meant, I didn't mean to say that, I meant many people outside of Asia believe in this stereotype. As an Asian and a human, I don't believe in this stereotype
You're right
Actually, It's not related to genetics. I mean it might be influenced by that but by a very minute amount. If you practice a lot, have an interest and are ready to do whatever you can, you can become really good, like really good
I don't believe any of these things to be clear but ik that many people do. It's actually nice to know there're people around here who don't believe in this
Anyways, this is a trig and geometry channel
I have the solution to this and I have solved for all the angles. Do you need a photo of the working?
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Hey guys i need help with a trigonometry problem so:
In a right-angled triangle ABG with A=90, BG=10cm and hB=0.8 are given. Find: a) The length of side AG
b) The length of side AB.
c) The other trigonometric numbers of angle B.
d) The area of triangle ABG.
e) The height of AD corresponding to the hypotenuse BG.
A also stands for angle at A (angle BAG)
oh
A is the corner of the triangle and hB is a trigonometrical number
hB is a trigonometrical number
for what
Idk what is hB tho lol
yeah
Oh
so sin(B) = 0.8?
yep
what have you tried
nothing cuz its complicating for me 😅 im not good with trigonometry i dont really understand same with Pythagorean theorem
B is above point A, right?
did you draw a diagram
Have you tried drawing a diagram
there isnt any diagram in the photocopy
hence, did "you" draw
because then, AG would be 8
which would just form a normal right angled triangle pair, 6,8,and 10
im so bad at maths
height of ad?
im sorry for the troubles
I'm in grade 7
there isnt any diagram
No, I mean the triangle is ABG
That’s why you have to draw it !!!
But I dont know ! 😦
have you even drawn a right triangle before
doesn't trig start in grade 9 or 10?
Im only good with equations
every country has a different curriculum
ik
yes
can you start by doing that
Is it possible for you to send the question, then the community can help
imma use 3d drawing
Yeah
Pls don't tell us you're doing 3d trig
Still that can be done on 2d paper, my apologies
label the point at the right angle with A
that's just like any other right triangle, making the right triangle and diagram is a skill in itself
no
do you know what a right angle is
and d shouldn't be there
its a type of triangle with an angle that has a measure of 90
o
Can you share a pic of the question once?
It's not possible they suddenly mention a random point d out of nowhere
oh
i used google translate
google translate isn't that accurate sometimes
label the other two points of your triangle with B,G
not a typo
top one should be b ideally
D is the point on BG where AD is perpendicular to BG, worry about that later
recall what sides sine gives the ratio of
opposite vertical side and hypotenuse
thats how i learnt it in school
because opposite(AG)/hypotenuse(BG which is 10) is sin
We can derive that 8/10 is 0.8
not ideal to use vertical as then you might get mixed up with the line that looks vertical here
yeah
which isn't the side opposite to B
oh
the positions are relative to the angle you're using
and how the image is rotated/oriented should make zero impact on your ability to identify them
Also, you can use sohcahtoa to remember these ratios
I will start a tutorial class on Maths this summer i just need to pass the exams
:/
How to find the other trigonometric numbers sine cosine tangent?
actually thats easy
Assuming that B is the right angle, and G is on the hypotenuse, then we can use the sine rule to find the missing sides. We know that sin(90°)=root(1), and sin(90°-x°)=1/2 (x being the angle AG), so the length of AG is AG = 10/2 = 5 right?
I think i found all the answers
idk imma ask the teacher
thx guys
ig
that's wrong
B is not the right angle
Sorry for the delay, had to go somewhere
you don't need the sine rule for now
Basically, yes, this is fine
so in this case
angle BAG = 90
degrees
now you know that sin is opposite/hypotenuse
right?
@upper karma
yes
yes
Now, the hypotenuse is 10, meaning the denominator is 10. now think, what should the numerator be
x/10=0.8
transpose and you get x=8
because 0.8*10=8
So far so good?
x being the opposite side to theta which is AG
so 8 is the length of AG
why isnt it 5 tho
Now you can just use pythagoras even though it's a pair we all know for right angled triangles
why should it be?
i mean if we use the sin rule as i said
You don't need the sin rule, and I don't know it yet, you must be making some mistake
unless it's written in the question solve with the help of the sin rule
no its not
so, you don't need it
for these kind of simple basic questions, you don't need it
So you found out the length of AG
which is 8 cm
now they're asking you to find the length of ab
then we need the length of AB
So, you can just use pythagoras now
Tell me what answer you get
Found an answer?
10 squared = 100. 8 squared = 64, now 100-64 = ?
what do you get?
ok
What do you get?
No, like what side length do you get after using the pythagoras theorem
AB
Not the answer to 100-64, the final answer, like the length of ab
yeah
yes
yes, you're getting the hang of it
36
so we know that x squared = ?
36 squared?
do i need to type the equation?
this
i need to square 36?
no, but you're close
if you don't get it in the next try, then I'll tell it
hint
is
that we're working with squares
not square roots
x squared = 36
36ab?
wait didnt i say that
You said x squared = 36 squared
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
That was the answer to 100-64 which is 36
and i did
u confused me with your question
you said 36 squared
yeah yeah
Yes
another example now for Pythagoras theorem to test your knowledge
I know Pythagorean theorem u just confused me
if hypotenuse is 5 and one side is 4, what's the other side
with explanation
The other side is square root ( 5^2 - 4^2 ) = square root of 21, which is approximately 3.45
no
no
nooooooooooooo
everything is wrong after 5^2-4^2
the square root of 21 is not even related
and 3.45 is not the square root of 21
you clearly need help with pythagoras
tell me what 5^2-4^2 is
@upper karma
tell
what are they facing trouble with? Pythagoras Theorem in general or subtracting squares?
First, he asked help for a trig question
He understood till where I explained AG=8
then he had to find AB, which was easy given you have the hypotenuse(10cm) and AG(8cm)
you just need pythagoras
I'd suggest drawing a figure for clarity
He has
this
Right right
wdym what is this
like solve it
5² - 4² = ?
Yeah