#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 13 of 1
i told you the steps - im answering kade on the probability now 👍
ok, thanks bro
do you need to prove independence mathematically or can you just do it with words?
mathematically
yeesh
this was my friends as an example, he had different data
p(a)(b)= 19.57% and p(a|b) was 20%
wait yeah oops 🤦♂️
P(A|B) = 1
P(A) = 11/50
since isn't the probability of choosing cheerios given the fact that you drank the milk after eating cheerios 100%?
If this helps, 5 people drank milk and 6 people did not drink the milk
after they ate cheerios
sorry for a late response
Thats why I was saying p(B) is 5/11
@granite void Sorry
So the question is basically
ope mb
How do you find the probabilty of A given B
P(A∩B)
how do you find that
P(B)= 5/11
P(A) = 11/50
can you not use P(A|B) != P(A)?
Whats the !
do you want us to help you with some geometry problems
Ah. Good old programming
Can anyone help to solve this? find the total area of the circles. ABCD is a unit square
So I've only been able to use linear algebra, but not fully understood how to interpret cos, sin etc. Now I'm looking at cos and I don't see how cos(0) = 1. I've learned that cos describes a vectors force/dir in the x-axis, right? If we say we have a hypotenuse with (1, 0) then cos == 1/1 = 1. So why is cos(0) == 1? Do they mean that cos(0) is the angle in radians between the hypotenuse and the x-axis-aligned unit vector and that if they are parallell (aka givs 1 as a result) is the same as if cos == 0 degrees? What confuses me thought is that cos(delta) = adjecent/hypo, so why doesnt my example give cos(1) when adj and hype are parallell and in the same dir?
and how is cos(alfa) = 0 the same as alfa = pi/2? can i device both sides if I have 0 on one?
nvm, i just saw why cos(alfa) = 0 <=> cos(alfa) = pi/2. we know that cos(alfa) = adjecent(which has zero in x-axiz) / hyp gives cos(alfa) = 0/1 which is cos(alfa) = 0 which means that they have a 90 degree (aka pi/2) angle inbetween except if the adjacent isnt a 0-vector, right?
Approach this by writing out what areas you can find out
Maybe divide the figure into seperate parts by numbering them
Can someone explain to me how to set proportions to solve this question?
Use the Similarity Criterion
Corresponding sides of Similar triangles are Proportional.
Can someone help me with this?
for Q5, it's a 30-60-90 right triangle case where the the hypotenuse is twice the measure of the shortest side (x) while the longest side is sqrt.3 times the measure of the shortest side (x)
for Q6, a since it's a square (sides are equal, angles measure 90 deg each), then can use the pythagorean theorem to find the value of x (the diagonal)
hypotenuse^2=base^2+altitude^2
for Q4 you can set up a proportion x over 3 = 3 over 5
You could also try solving Q4 using Pythagorus Theorem
Can anyone help me on this
@upper karma do you still need help with this
I do
I think so; it's the total area of all shapes involved, yes?
"all the shapes involved" is a little vague.
but yes, for a polyhedron -- a solid whose surface consists of a number of flat faces -- the surface area is just the sum of all faces' areas
so with that in mind
can you say what is causing you trouble with this particular prism?
(a) I am unable to take inventory of what faces the prism has.
(b) I know what faces the prism has, but I am unable to calculate some or all of their areas.
(c) I know what faces the prism has, and I am able to calculate their areas and add them up, but I get the wrong answer.
A
do you know what faces a prism has generally?
Yes.
...
you're generalizing too far
okay, let's try this again
how many faces does YOUR prism have, and what shapes are they?
This is what I got from the values. Is it right?
Yeah, pythagorean theorem your way to victory
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
is the answer 48.6 degrees?
if it is, then i can explain how i did it
You got 4 and 6 correct, though for 5, could you just provide working out? I'm not sure what you did.
I might be wrong, but for the dimensions of the whole parallelogram, I think it's 10 inches by 20.
okay but how would u get the triangle areas
I multiplied the first one by radical three, then doubled the hypotenuse
seems about right, but maybe try to provide a solution and statement regarding q5
not completely sure about this (just giving it a try), but the parallelogram could be made up of 4 equilateral triangle triangles as the edge to the midpoints of height & length of the parallelogram essentially measures half the complete measure of each dimension. so, triangle ADF has sides =10, then segment EF cuts the equilateral triangle into two congruent right triangles, hence, we could find the base using pythagorean theorem..
wait im lost sorry.. (maybe someone nerdy can verify these initial steps I did)
A=1/2(base*height)
the problem i countered is that the area of the triangle ADF (combining the area of right triangles DEF & AEF) from the measures DE = 5 & DF = 10 then using pythagorean theorem to find EF, finding the area of DEF and multiplying it to 2, (refer to previous statement) multiplied to 4 (as 4 equilateral triangles make up the whole parallelogram) isn't sufficient to meet the area of parallelogram which is 200 in.^2 (assuming the dimensions of the parallelogram is 20l by 10h)
Nah it’s 135
aight ill try that one again in a bit
Markscheme says 135.5 degrees
show work
uh idk if that's the place to ask this type of kinda abstract tip but
I have too much intuition at geometry
and that's about it
I have a lot of dificulty proving what my intuition says
how do I improve proving specially geometrical stuff? that also counts for other subjects but specially geometry
I actually have an easy time proving algebraic stuff but geometry breaks me
What was your answer?
You just have to learn the rules
Like for triangles
You have to reference preexisting ideas in proofs, so you just need to learn what those ideas are
Like for example triangle similarity and congruency rules
hm
thx
maybe I lack the basics
cus yk, bad school
yeah np
How do i beg for help
@upper karma#❓how-to-get-help
Did you put your answer to 1 decimal point?
using :
area of cross section times l,
$1.1 times 1.7 times 3$
Ishigami Senku
VOLUME OF ANY PRISM = CROSS SECTIONAL AREA TIMES LENGTH
Can someone help me figure this out?
Use the Pythagorean theorem
and for b) operate with inverse functions
smallest triangle in the 7th problem must be 45-45-90 right?
Yeah
yeah, it all shall go to sqrt(13), which is fun
This is another one I need help with?
Which part
Slope is rise/run rememeber
Calculate from A to B since they’re whole numbers
Are you familiar with a linear graph equation?
y=mx+b
to prove that H is the orthocenter of ΔABC, is it enough to prove that 2 altitudes of ΔABC intersect at point H?
Yes
ah yes
it's useful, eh?
I don’t follow? What is that particularly fun
Do you need help with the linear equation problems?
yes
Which question?
What do you not understand?
For 10a, the slope is determined by rise/run, which in over words is the change in y divided by the change in x. So for the slope of the hill AB, It would be -8/10. The negative is necessary because you read a graph from left to right, and in this case the slope is declining from left to right. So from the slope -8/10, you would simplify it to -4/5
For 10b, to write an equation, the form of it would be y = mx+b. The y is obviously just the y value. The 'm' is the slope, x is the x value, and the b is the y intercept. So for the slope, we are given that it is -1/3. So then we can substitute the value into m, giving us y = -1/3(x) + b. From this, we are missing the y intercept. The intercept is given on the graph, and from this we know it is 8. So from this info, we can write the equation as y = -1/3(x) + 8.
For 10c, your asked to find the x intercept. To find x intercept, you have to let your y = 0, because the y of any x intercept will always be 0. So from here you would get the equation, and write it as 0 = -1/3(x) + 8, and solve x as normal.
no you got it right
just in decimal form
Try to write the answer in a fraction
-0.8 over 10?
For this a = sqrt of 2, b = sqrt of 3, c = sqrt of 4 or 2, d = sqrt of 5 and etcetera.
No the answer is -4/5
but if you actually divide those 2 numbers you would get -0.8
which is the same thing
So you basically got it correct
I got that one
Ty
No problem
- is the definition of a complementary, (2 angles that add to 90 degrees). Though for 9. because it says both angles are complementary, that means they both add to 90 degrees. Though, I don't know how to put that into an answer form. I assume you would say the definition of a complementary or = 90 degrees?
Yes
Brackets aren't necessary for x in question b but it doesn't really make a difference.
But you do what's best for you
Ok
For c I just have 0=-1/3x+8
Is that good?
Oh ok
So it would be 8 = -1/3x
and then times 3 both sides to get 24 = -x
wait
No i messed up
I would multiple -1/3 from both sides right?
it should have been -8 = -1/3x my bad
I'm not used to solving algebra on keyboard
I understand that😂
And then 8 = 1/3x
times 3 on both sides and you get x = 24
So the answer would be (24,0)
Dont just write x = 24
Their asking for the coordinate so this would be the answer
If I knew anything from that, I remember to put that😂😂
Can you respond in dms?
It would be easier to ask there
Yeah sure
the sequence
I just like it
What about it makes it interesting
same
you don't encounter sqrt k as a sequence often
guys
position of a circle with respect to and the circle
i really dont understand
should the slope for 10a be -4/-5= 4/5?
or im just quite confused
No but like what’s the pattern of the sequence
It looked pretty random to me
just sqrt k
thats just the question
Yeah I meant like is there anything I can use to find XY2
It is the question but idk what concept I should use to find XY2. In learning polygons rn and it would be nice to get some hints
Note that PQX and SRY are both 3-4-5 triangles, so you can draw the whole configuration nicely on graph paper.
(Draw it such that PX and QX are parallel to the grid of your graph paper, and the lines of length 10 are diagonal...)
No, that does not have the orientation I'm describing -- and it's not to scale either...
U want me to use a distance formula to find the answer?
I don’t think it’s the point of the question
No, I want you to draw a nice TO SCALE diagram on graph paper.
Start by drawing a 6-8-10 triangle such that the right angle between the "6" and "8" sides align with the grid of the graph paper.
Or, in yet other words select your coordinate system such that X is at (0,0), P is at (8,0) and Q is at (0,6).
When you complete the drawing from that starting point, all the points in the configuration ends up being grid points.
And you can then read off the coordinates of Y directly by counting grid squares on your drawing.
Oh
Yeah that’s easy but like as I said it’s not the point of the question. I also wanna know the relation in between polygons with XY^2 cuz that’s what I’m learning and this question is related to polygons and not drawing a perfectly scaled graph on a specific type of paper and counting squares
So you're saying the question you posted is no the question you want to answer?
Oh wait actually nvm I just realized smth thanks
Well I also wanna understand how to do it. Yk is kinda like cheating if I answer that way
To me it looks like the author of the problem when to great lengths to make it possible to answer it the way I describe. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
If they wanted a more cumbersome procedure, they could easily have chosen the given lengths such that they wouldn't fit a simple grid-point solution.
Ah, clever! But it seems to be a detour to begin talking about sqrt(2) when the problem explicitly asked for |XY|² rather than |XY| itself. We could just use Pythagoras directly on triangle XWY.
You’re saying the point was just to draw it out and count?
That seems not really to be the point imo
There’s no geometry/trig knowledge then
Just basic math
Noticing that a given situation has nice properties that allow a shortcut is a valuable mathematical skill.
completely agree
but I've never thought that counting grid squares would count
like that seems too detached from the content they are actually learning
it's cool that it occurred in geometry
that's it
What?
even though expected
Wdym occurred in geometry
the sqrt k sequence
What’s that
sqrt 1, sqrt 2, sqrt 3, etc
No
Because it's declining, the whole fraction would be a negative
but not whole too
anyone know this
tropo's right. That's clever and im quite surprised to see it that way
looks fun to solve such geo-problem
stop multiposting
anyone here know how to solve theorems?
paying nitro if i get my activities answered and correctly
no monetary compensation talk here. people are willing to help you free of charge.
(as long as you put in the effort and listen)
can you post your problem as an image,
people are wary of downloading files
For every "n"th figure, the number of points are 4n.
fig.3 - 4(3) = 12 points
fig.4 - 4(4) = 16 points
fig.5 - 4(5) = 20 points
Similarly you can find number of points for fig.50 and 200.
no, just cool sequence, what?
Guys can this be used to prove putagoras therium and if it can how
Pythagoras' theorem
So you’re in 9th
guys I think going straight to that olympiad geometry book without knowing basic geometry ain't working
I think what I'm going to do for practice is go through a basic geometry book from start to finish and justify pretty logically all my answers to exercises, even the ones in the start that are like "if there are two points A and B such that A=B, there is a straight line r such that A belongs to r and B belongs to r"
the first one is how the points lie right? or does the order not matter at all
I know for some things in cyclic quadrilaterals it matters
like that one first theorem from this book
in that first image, two angles are the same an the other ones are different, same for some quadrilaterals in that triangle with the orthic triangle
and yes I think this one matters
oh someone helped me and it doesnt matter
but ty
❤️
you also doing egmo?
I was but
.
i did like a few chapters geometry from aops vol 1
which was enough
i can send you the file if you want
yk, two hours solving some simple problems and getting very stuck at proofs cus idk the basic rules of geometry and stuff
nah I already have a basic geometry book of preference
oh ok
it's a brazilian book from a famous series which like, everyone recommends to everyone cus they're very good
oh nice
"fundamentals of elementary mathematics" vol 9: Plane Geometry
I'm also doing its combinatorics
my algebra is pretty ok, I just need geometry and combinatorics, which are the most useful for the olympiad I'm going for
also geometry makes me have some like, spiritual experiences sometimes, and combinatorics is amazing for answering my stupid questions I make myself sometimes
so they're very cool
(I mean, my high school algebra, never studied the real stuff)
oh i do algebra just for fun
geometry because in school we do nearly no geometry
i want to do number theory and combinatorics too, but dont have time rn
idk if i want to do math competitions
I think they're cool to have an objective
and they can help entering universities and stuff
Did i do this right?
Hi, could you figure out the volume of a cone with only the slant height?
ONLY the slant height? no.
hey would anyone be able to help me with vectors
can u figure out polar form of a vector just from its magnitude
How are you supposed to do part b for this
Because we aren’t given any individual i and j components so I can’t use the scalar product
part ii, you mean?
so I can’t use the scalar product
can't as in unable or can't as in unauthorized?
I’m having a hard time trying to prove that all equilateral triangles are equiangular
like i created the altitude and used the pythagorean theorem, but i end up just defining the length of the sides
How does this thing prove phyntagora therium
I love trignometry
afaik, by pythagorean theorem, the ratio of the trig function respective to its angle is equal to the ratio of the trig func of the angle that corresponds the other angle (which are congruent), if you cut the equilateral triangle in half with the altitude
although idk how to formally construct this proof, if it's even considered one
eg, the given values of angles are 60-60-60, hence by cutting the triangle in half, you'd get a 60-30-90 special triangle,and the ratio of the corresponding side lengths of both triangles are in proportion. Hence, using the ratio of the sides that corresponds to the trig func, we can find the angle and prove thay the triangle with equal sides have congruent interior angles
not sure if this is sufficient, hopefully others could elaborate or verify this (personally intrigued as well)
A rhombus has sides of length 51 units each and a shorter diagonal of length 48 units. What is the length, in units, of the longer diagonal?
Isn't the ans 45?
no
how can the longer diagonal be shorter than the shorter diagonal
how are you getting 45
^^^ Yeah how are you getting a longer short diagonal than the actual long diagonal itself?
in my head, the difference between the longer diagonal and shorter diagonal measures based on the given doesnt seem to make a rhombus? or maybe it does
I didn't notice this😢
Well shorter diagonal is 48 so half is 24 and side is 51 then using a^2 + b^2 = c^2, 24^2 + x^2 = 51^2.
Was just about to say to use the Pythagorean Theorum.
Take the given diagonal, divide it in half, use the Pythagorean Theorum and plug 51 in for c, and 24 in for b, just solve for a.
did exactly this!
yeah very rough
and can you show what x represents in that diagram?
does x actually represent the full diagonal or something else?
x represents half of the long diagonal? thus the long diagonal is 90
oh I forgot doing 2(45)
yes
Thanks...
always remember what your variable(s) represent
A rectangular tile measures 3 inches by 4 inches. What is the fewest number of these tiles that are needed to completely cover a rectangular region that is 2 feet by 5 feet?
How do I look at this?
not sure about this, but here's my attempt to help:
Let's first convert the rectangular region's dimensions into
inches for convenience, where 1ft=12inches
so its width would be (2 feet times 12 inches)/1ft, and its length would be (5 feet times 12 inches)/1ft. Hence, from here, you can get the area of the rectangular region where Area=length timeswidth
On the phrase fewest number of these tiles (referring to the rectangular tile with lengths measuring 4 inches and widths measuring 3 inches), im not quite sure bcoz of the wording. So, I'd say it meant how many of the tiles would fit in the area of the rectangular region without any overlaps.
If it is, then the ratio of the dimensions of the rectangular tile is stated as 3:4, where 3 is the width and 4 is the length. A=l times w
Here, we divide the area of the rectangular region by the area of the rectangular tile, thus giving us the fewest number of tiles needed to completely cover the said region.
I was given this question in my homeowork and I have no idea how to solve it, anyone able to help?
is 28cm the measure of the whole base?
Yup
have u don right triangle theorems?
Yes, I have.
what do u know so far that u think is helpful for this
btw could u label the edges of the triangle?
Idk what you mean by that
like name the edges as A B or C, to not get confused with instructions
add letter D on the intersection of BC and the height as well😅
Calculate the area of the whole triangle? Is that what it is asking
Yes
Wdym and the hight?
the broken line with 10cm measure
Put the letter d in the middle?
yeah like that
Okay, sorry
is 28cm the measure of BD? or BC?
Can you specify to me what 28 cm refers to. Is the the length of BD or BC?
BC
Okay, then bh/2 to victory
Your base is 28
And your height is 10
Multiply the two and divide by 2
Okay
Don't forget to change the units to cm^2
Okay, thanks!
@Underjuice
im stumped
i'm going to fail my tests bro
pi/2 and 3pi/2 is part of the answers but so is pi/4 and 5pi/4
however that would mean that the work above is like
possibly completely off from what the actual answer is
maybe csc 2x isn't 1/sin 2x and maybe multiplying both sides by sin 2x doesn't work either
i don't know
can someone steer me in the right direction
There is a glaring mistake when you multiplied sin 2x to the whole equation
@nocturne remnant i am afraid i am still stumped
Side length x bisects side length 10
Meaning the “height” of each triangle is 5
can you show your work
i just dont know where to go from this and even here i think i'm already wrong
mental block 
the whole thing is * sin2x, not just 1/sin2x
i think multiplying by sin 2x is a reasonable thing to do, especially considering the identity sin 2x = 2 sin x cos x
then ||see if you can express everything in terms of sin 2x and cos 2x||
||after the dust settles you should get tan 2x = -1 which gives the solutions||
@finite elbow
i really don't have the brain for gemoetry
is CDM a right triangle
Yes
If the border added is 2 inches, how are the dimensions increased to 4 instead of 2.
maybe expand sin2x, sub in cos^2 (x) + sin^2(x) instead of 1
and u have urself a hidden quadratic
I solved this using some trigonometry
I'll share the solution in a bit
There may have been some errors in approximating the values but this is the process
Hi
Can someone explain why b is correct? Not a
Ik that it should be equal to a positive number probably because r^2 but idk what to do tbh
do you know how to complete the square?
that way you are able to get (x-h)^2 + (y-k)^2 = r^2
where (h,k) is the coordinates of the center of the circle
yea i do
my fault for the late response
That is not necessary
necessary? no.
ideal? yes.
@viscid tinsel
I mean the post above works for me. It is up to the person to use what is best for them.
best not to blindly apply formulae without knowing where they come from
Are those first two correct and can anyone help with the second two?
the first two are wrong
your values aren't even in the range of the given functions
consider applying trig formula/rules applicable to non-right triangles
trig formula for area could be used to determine a
after getting a, cos rule/law can be used to determine b
What's wrong with the approach
The left side of the figure has a different length than what you wrote
I found the area of the missing region to complete the rectangle, added both areas, and then found the length. What's wrong with this approach?
What would be the area if the whole rectangle were filled in?
How did you get that?
Yes. First figure out what the area of the full rectangle would be
Make a guess. How did you get 69 before?
adding both the given area and the area of the missing region right.
Yes, so how can you figure out the area of that missing region?
idk,
You're given enough information to calculate the missing area. Draw a picture and think about it; there's a simple approach you might be missing
ok I'll try
Don't just solve a problem for someone else
no tell me if its right im not sure
It's not
That's what I asked you. There's a way to simplify the area
what way?
Think of geometric figures for which it is very easy to calculate areas
😕
? Look very closely at your drawing. What is the "simplest" geometric figure that you know the area of, in general?
Is the area 8ft^2?
square
No, but how did you arrive at that value?
considering it a square, area would be 16, then divide by 2 to find the area of the staircase
There's a simpler way. You're still thinking of the whole missing portion, which is complicated
But you can do it that way as well, it wouldn't be exactly half though
hmm.
How about this, what do most bathroom floors look like (in the US, at least, not sure where you live)?
area is 10?
Yes! How did you get it
considering each square separately and finding the area
then adding them all
Awesome, that's what I was getting at w/ the bathroom floor (think of connected tiles)
OK so if the missing portion has area = 10, then...
perimeter is 63
Not the perimeter
then?
You tell me... why did I even ask you to find the area of the missing part? What can you do w/ that information
then the area of the whole square would be 63, we already know the width which is 9 so now we can find the length
which would be 22.5
@raven sable
The length of what?
the whole square.
.
That doesn't add up. Don't skip steps
The area of the given figure is 53; the area of the whole square (filled in) would be 63. The bottom line has length 9
What does all that tell you about another unknown that you need for perimeter?
how do we know that its a square, I mean adding the given area and the area we found
sorry for poor eng, btw
Sorry, I meant rectangle. You're right, but that shouldn't matter. (Your english is fine)
Total area (filled in) would be 63. Bottom length is 9. What's the one thing you can calculate from those 2 pieces of information?
it tells us that the other unknown is of length 22.5
You're jumping ahead again. I'm trying to take you through it step by step
from these 2 pieces of information we can find the length.
Length of what?
the whole square
The whole thing is a rectangle, actually. But no, you're jumping ahead.
The whole area (if it were filled in), is 63. The bottom side is length 9. Think about the formula for the area of a rectangle
The formula of the area of the rectangle is A = 2(L + W).
oh yeah sorry I forgot its the formula for the perimeter
the formula for A is L * W
Exactly. So what can you solve for there
the length of the left side
Thanks a lot @raven sable
Did you get it?
yeah
Yea i figured it out by completing the square, ty
Hi
45.3cm I think
Trig ratios for the top triangle ABD and you can use Sin law for the bottom one.
<@&286206848099549185>
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
is this a test?
no
and work
D
yes
ok that’s what i got
can you show him the work?
it’s fine
ok
yeah, thanks
wait me some time
there you go, he did it for you
ty
We need to grasp the conditions given by the topic
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
Wait so 13m is thr hypotenuse
Yes
So 25m plus x2 = 169
Deduct 169-25
144
144=x2
Square root of 144
12
Is that right?
Yeah
Try to calculate AC
From what it looks like you can use Right angle trig but it’s been a minute since I’ve done these questions 😂
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
.
<@&268886789983436800> Ban please.
<@&268886789983436800>
Okay so
.
Answer this when you online
Without trigonometry is also possible to solve
But if you don't want to use trigonometry you have to know about Heron's formula
But I'm curious about the way to solve this question in trigonometry.
I can't figure it out.
I didn't know about law of cosines
earlier
now looking into it
One more thing
Yea?
This also reach the answer, if you have no idea how to use trigonometry in this question, like me.
Yep I did herons
solve how?
Area of it?
Not just AC can be the base and get the answer.
I am just giving him the clue
Can't give him the entire answer
Ah I see
WHat's the formula for area?
I am looking into heron's formula, but to use it we need 3 sides
1/2 * base * height
Cause you have height here
You use herons formula when there is no height
what is height here?
Wait
Make your own height
There's no height
Yes
Making a new line to help you is one of the technique to solve geometry problems.
Thinking about it, if we think about the bases being AD or AB, what are the perpendicular heights of each triangle? Does it matter whether the height isn't given?
Depends on the way you wanna solve it
I have only one side
don't I need atleast two
to find height by dividing the triangle in middle making it right-angled and then applying Pythagoras theorem
Em make it but not mean to calculate it
Yeah
It's gonna be a variable
Take it as
X
And using that X
Solve that entire question
Tip: Always try to have one variable
Not more
@delicate owl
If triangles have same height but different bases, what is the ratio of their area based on?
Yep
Wha to do next?
idk
Buddy
You know this right?
yeah
So
If Height is same
And you know 1/2 is constant
What's left?
Base
Yes
so 2/5 is the ans
Yeah-
Triangle CDB
Yes.
still, how do I find the height of this triangle?
Is it possible?
Thanks @delicate owl and @sudden crystal for help
Well you can't
With not height or area or base or angles or sides
Then
Of course Impossible
ok thnx
you on?
Yeah
you said use trigno for the previous question, I looked into law of cosinces
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
Yes
so how can I use law of cosinces
yeah
You needa find
DC-DA
BD is perpendicular to AC
Meaning there's a 90 degree formed
I will give you a clue
You can use this
But it also might not work
Assume value of X
Or
You can go with trigno
Whatever sails yo boat
Hi, do you wanna hear something awful?, I was doing my trigonometry test last thursday and there was an problem that needed to solve the length of a castle, I was doing it really good, because it was a normal triangle, at first I realized that it have an angle of 80 grades, so it wasn't a right triangle, so i used trigonometric ratios... I think it was to easy so I decide to use the leg theorem (It doesnt work on a 80 grades triangle!!!) so i fucked up 🙂
still law of cosines won't work because it needs atleast 2 sides and one angles
Why do you need law of cosines?
Why not normal trigno?
That's sad dude
what do you mean by normal trig?
The normal formulas
c^2 = a^2 +b^2?
No
I will use the height teorem ... i am learning trigonometrics so dont listen to me
with the height you can solve the base
yeah
Tan= opp/adj
Which one you gonna use?
And which side you want
Think
I will drop the question here for you to think
Base
DC and AD
ABC is a right triangle?
So which triangle you wanna take?
No
BDC
Good
To find DC
What and all can you use?
You have BDC as 90 degrees
BC as X+1
That is
Is?
Which exact formula?
considering BDC we get cos theta = base/x + 1
B?
BD i think so
Okay
I will give the answer
But will you promise to send the answer that you tried out in DMs?
ok tomorrow for sure
after test
ok np and thanks
Hi
how would i go about solving a problem like this if anyone could help
The right triangles to the left and right of the x are similar. You can use this to find an equation for x.
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
use the altitude on hypotenuse theorem, which states that the altitude squared equals the smaller parts of the bigger triangles hypotenuses multiplied together
I despise geometry and trigonometry to the max... Idk how yall do this but help me please
whats your question
Em I would like to know
How are you going to solve it with trigo
dont crosspost
wdym
i dont understand how my maths teacher got this answer can anyone help?
Hi
which channel would i talk graph theory in
How can I prove that cos(x) and sec(x) are always leq and meq (respectively) than x/sin(x) between the domain (-1, 1)? (Ofc, we could define the domain to be anywhere so long as within the domain, cos(x) <= x/sin(x) <= sec(x). yes, squeeze theorem shinnanigans at it again, in this case im trying to prove that limit of x/sin(x) as x approaches 0 is 1)
I heard that this is a special case which is proved via geometry. How would this be done?
A circle with an area of 100pi square cm is dilated so that it’s image has an area of 25pi square cm. What is the scale factor of the dilation?
It was 1/2 got it right
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
,w true or false cos(x)<x/sin(x)
Leq*
,w true or false cos(x)<=x/sin(x)
,w true or false sec(x)>=x/sin(x)
When we do squeeze theorem, we're defining it at a domain
Mb
Should have specified, lemme fix my original qn
Ok fixed
well, you resolved the ± sign incorrectly, for one
and you might actually not be wrong aside from that...
,calc cos(195 deg)
Result:
-0.96592582628907
,calc sqrt(1/2 + sqrt(3)/4)
Result:
0.96592582628907
yeah so it's only a sign error you committed
gonna be difficult to simplify your root-inside-a-root into the form that the value is typically expected to be in
,calc (sqrt(2)-sqrt(6))/4
Result:
-0.25881904510252
You are using the wrong formula. Thats the compound angle formula for sine not cosine
Can anyone solve this...I have solved it a whole ago but now I don't remember the way I did it..iirc it's from EGMO
probably ask in #competition-math then
@ me when solved I just need help on this problem 😭😭
Similar triangles
Find them
What’s the value of x tho?
We aren’t here to give you answers
Can anyone help me understand area of a sector
do you get it now
A little
Or one halve times the radius squared times theta
Can someone help me prove these theorems
Using
SAS
SSS
ASA
AAS
HL
Or not congruent
um for number 1
it's SSA
because the right angle, congruent side, then BC being the same(refl. prop)
2cnd is sas
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
especially not if the solution is wrong
dummy ask for help
Don't call me a dummy
Don't call me a doofus dingaling
oh damn, why you so sensitive smellfungus
Im not sensative
It just hurt my feelings
no
that didn’t hurt at all
oh
we’re acting right
ohh nooo
that was so offensive
what ☠️
Stfu
no thanks 
Least toxic mathcord conversation
Aw man you took it too far
You can't call them a dingaling
real
don’t be a sensitive silly doofus
ew
You unleashed the darkness side
YOU STINKY POOPOO FAT HEAD STINKY BUTT
I have a whole life ahead of me
that’s not bad
Im about to curse now cuz u unleashed senpai dark wolf apon your self
hi
shrunkenpenis with ittybittytitties
Ass head
uh oh!!
😈😈😈😈😈😈
now I’m cursed!!
nononn
oh what shall i do!?
Nothibg
pussyheadedshrivledupdick
Only one of them is true
Maybe both
But
your ass cheeks are shriveled
And u etupid
And you are dumb
And stupid
atleast ion sat facting is a word 💀
Its a word
whoa
Nah jk