#study-discussion
1 messages · Page 6 of 1
you’ve been giving advice and resources before
the best way to relearn math is to actually go and do math
instead of constantly asking about what the best way to learn it is
it doesn’t take very long to review all the material you’ve listed; you just need to actually get started
why is it hard?
are you struggling on the content material or even getting started?
The more study the more stupid I felt myself
Insecure
i meannn tbh that’s the point
Unfortunately I am losing confidence as I used to
i hope you realize in a nice comforting way; a lot of people in math have some imposter syndrome but that also motivates them to push themselves further
why losing confidence?
Because, I used to plan to finish not only topology, intro analysis revision, abstract algebra and linear algebra during the summer
Now I felt I barely can do those all
And it made me so scared I might lack behind
The product topology made thing harsh for me and again bad mental health
I started to question if I am clever enough
I used to be quite okay for being dumb but Becasue of the new study i started to care a little
lol this is funny bc we briefly talked about burnout and i’ve noticed the past couple of days afterwards of you conversing you are describing burnout yourself
But it’s not burnout
i think you might be in denial about being burnt out?
do you know what burn out is i guess i should ask
I am just unable to keep the progress and a bit insecure
Like you don’t do anything because of stress
Imposter syndrome probably
yeah this is what burn out is
imposter syndrome usually just means you feel inferior but that doesn’t affect the work ethic you have
burn out is characterized by having trouble being able to focus or maintaining upkeep and dedication to progress
like you are tired or stressed to keep continuing to do work
i honestly think, bc it’s summer, try to enjoy the rest of it
also even my professors only do one textbook at a time
no one and i mean no one can do 4 topics or materials without having some stress or lesser dedication
it’s better to just finish one textbook at a time that you can understand a lot better rather than half doing all of them
a personal analogy ofc, but everyone who i’ve seen who have done many different topics at once; i have yet to see them finish any one of them
if you feel a little stressed or tired even doing one textbook, i just take a short break before tackling that same textbook again
Maybe that’s the case
is Cengeze book best for math jee??
it depends on what regard, burn out is when you have responsibilities or you want to do something but you are just tired and cant dedicate yourself to it
Its similar to the feeling senioritis where you are "tired of school"; but usually burnout is a lot worse bc the responsibilities can be a lot more demanding than what you can handle during that time
ive seen many people drop their semesters classes in total, because in part burn out
This is definitely true
Esp in the real world, burnout is hard when you are working a job and have bills
But if something is fun and couldn’t chase the progress I found it hard to classify it as burn out though
yeah def agree, dont think its a hot take, its a mix of stress of any kind
But yeah being used to it / having a sustainable practice or routine or even having tolerance does impact it, in this case studying
maybe the message you replied to was a little misunderstood, but I was moreso commenting on having burnout while in the workforce rather than a student is a lot worse
Wrong channel
Open a help channel ( #❓how-to-get-help ) or ask in one of the subject relevant channels ( #calculus )
This is a list of my desired master degree's courses, followed by a list of the pre-requisite mathematical knowledge I'll need in order to study the degree. I want help on which books to use to study the concepts needed
Multivariate Stats
Fundamental concepts of Stats
Statisticsl Software
Linear Models
Generalized Linear Models
Statistical Consulting
Concepts of Bayesian Data Analysis
Modern Data Analytics
Data Management
Advanced Econometrics
Survey Methodology
Structucal Equations
Fundamentals of Financial Mathematics
Statistical Tools for Quantitative Risk Management
Official Statistics
Sampling Theory
Advanced Applied Econometrics
Data Visualization in Data Science
Total Quality Management
Data Mining and Neural Networks
Support Vector Machines: Methods and Applications
Math is a marathon not a sprint. You need to manage expectations. This level of load is unhealthy.
i think this could make sense depending on what it means
if you followed math55's syllabus over the summer, you could totally do that. I can see getting both semesters done if you don't have any other time commitments, and you treat just that like a full-time job.
the problem is that the work required is typically a giant jump from what was previously being done
people don't go from "doing some math for homework" to "study, self-motivatedly, four semester math courses"
in my experience, i'm far more productive if I just do math in my free time on a pocket legal pad
because focusing on what you're going to do and how fast tends to distract from math
and i find I don't need to do math for more than 5 minutes to get into a "let's focus on this for 4 hours state"
the point is consistency and trying not to spread myself too thin.
but then, since it felt easy to do that, i then say "oh, i should set aside four hours for math"
but then since I don't have 4 straight uninterrupted hours lined up, i find myself not doing math
the hard part, to me, isn't getting the stamina to work on one thing for 4-5 hours.
it's the first 5 minutes of doing a specific thing
psychologically, doing an exercise or filling in gaps in a proof with paper and pencil feels the same to me
as merely reading the proof and thinking about it in my head in the moment
actually writing makes your thoughts far more efficient and useful
it keeps them from wandering as much, since you have your memory laid out in front of you.
it's way more productive.
if I don't, the lack of visible productivity can feel demoralizing simply because i've wasted a bunch of time getting nothing done
but the other side of that is that even lemma sketches to flesh out later feel productive.
editing feels very satisfying. there's a confidence that's really nice.
i hope something in there is useful
wait, your measure theory grade was bad?
well, if you're taking measure theory, but are looking to do "intro analysis" and "topology" over the summer, maybe you just had holes in your background
But measure theory i did with a lot of luck
part of what makes that scary is that fixing the holes can be embarrassing
Indeed
The thing is, development of precise argumentation composition is never easy. I have been writing every single proof I saw I proved everything. But holes everywhere
And many things aren’t as easy as I thought too.
i'm not saying that it's impossible to do that work over the summer, though it's probably unrealistic
why not just spend a week or two and see what pace you should be at?
my measure theory grade was a 60
I guess i just worked too much
But I did it really with luck though, almost everything it comes to the exam was what I have prepared
side note:
that proof for the matrices can be shortened by noting a field is a monoid, and inducting on products
you get the group structure that way too, since fields are groups
you also don't need commutative multiplication to get the commutative addition structure.
if you mean commutativity of multiplication, that's actually wrong:
take permutation matrices for example
You actually read it 🥰🫣
I was trying to show matrix are addition are commutative I guess
I wrote note to he thorough for many reasons, one is to remember for revision another is to create memorize path 🫠
well, try just working through all the exercises
in whatever book you are going through
I do exercises too and usually I just rebrand them as propositions.. for abstract algebra the progress was quite slow
you don't even need induction, actually, you just note that it's a group if it's a group pointwise since that's how the inverse is constructed
that works for infinite dimensions
You actually note one of the most important problems I have been facing I rely overly on heavy mechanism
Hey, any help please? :( My message got lost
Unfortunately I think everybody despaired at seeing that laundry list of topics, and chose not to engage. That type of questions are very hard to answer, at least if you want to feel halfway confident your answer is even helpful.
literally me haha
If its something that you enjoy, just starting the task sometimes makes it run for much longer than intended. Like playing games, you say its only a short game, be it outside sports with friends or videogames, and it turns into an all day thing
unironically yeah
also this is a #book-recommendations question. but what tropo said still applies. If you plan on picking up one of those books in order, maybe just ask as you move along rather than having it all at once
I doubt just one person will have the answer to each one of those, another reason why
why do you choose to suffer
so true
hi
so i havent done math in 5 years and i wanna learn math again i was wondering if i could show my notes to someone and could i get feedback on them if theyre good or bad
i wanna do this for algebra 1 algebra 2 trig geometry precalc trig calc 1. calc 2 calc 3... etc
so on and so forth
like im 100%
I'd suggest checking out khan academy or paul's notes at https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/ since they have great notes here and helps u a lot with stuff
Welcome to my math notes site. Contained in this site are the notes (free and downloadable) that I use to teach Algebra, Calculus (I, II and III) as well as Differential Equations at Lamar University. The notes contain the usual topics that are taught in those courses as well as a few extra topics that I decided to include just because I wante...
but feel free to share ur notes too 
I'm willing to give u feedback
just wanna leave this remark that as long as the notes are accurate in content, pedagogically speaking everyone has their own style
so good or bad depends on whether you understand your own notes
does anyone have any ideas on how to
not screw up when
combining like terms
when solving polynomials
we define graph of f : X --> Y as G(f)={(x,f(x)) : x\in X}
can be find graph of of a relation that is not function?
like this
That is a subset of R^2 that is not a function, yes.
Hello
does anyone have any ideas on how to
not screw up when
combining like terms
when solving polynomials
practice
You've asked this question before, what answer do you expect other than the one given?
There's no tricks to this
because
the one im doing
isnt working
so i want to find a more efficient one
im mostly stuck on
$ax^3+bx^2+5x-2$\
When f(x) is divided by x-1, the remainder is 6\
When f(x) is divided by 2x+1, the remainder is -6\
Find the Value of a, and b.
Tan
well obv
using the remainder theorem
you put f(x) into it
but then what
you already know that the remainer is gonna be 6
What do you mean by put f(x) into it
You are supposed to equate them
$f(1)=f(-\frac{1}{2})$
Real Lost Fruit
Substitute those values in and then you will be all good
??????
i thought u find the equation for x-1 and 2x-1, and then solve em simultaneously
damn
i was wrong
No
What we were trying to do was to find the values of a and b, not the intersection between the two lines y=x-1 and y=2x-1
I just explained it to you
Oh sorry wait
Ah ok so plug the two in
And then you can solve for a and b simultaneously like you said
My bad, brain had an error
Can I see your working
sure
$P(1)=a(1/2)^3+b(1)2+5(1)-2\a+b+3=6\P(1/2)=a(1/2)^3+b(1/2)^2-5(1/2)-2\-6=1/8a+1/4b-5/2-2\Multiply by 8\-48=a+2b-20+2\a+2b=-26$
Tan
$a+b=3\a+2b=-26\b=-29$
Why is there a one half in front of a when you evaluated P(1)
Tan
misclick
its 1 on my notebook
When you multiplied by 8
Don't help people here and don't ask for help here
Take this to #prealg-and-algebra
Sorry!
should i just open a help channel
do y'all's unis have credit limits?
We're only allowed to bring 180/120 ECTS into the diploma, but there's nothing stopping me from doing more
lucky
yes
25 credits
most courses are 4 credit
with lab 5
and some 1.5 and 3 credit too
How many credits do you need for a bachelors degree
Per semester credit limits are common
For various reasons students famously like to overload themselves with more credits than they can handle. This wastes everybody's time and often wastes things like fin aid too.
Longer term limits can be a thing sometimes too.
150 i think
Yeah, that makes sense
Yea , but even 0.5 more is hard
Though in this case, assuming that the degree is supposed to be 6 semesters, limiting to exactly 150/6 credits is weird
Why cant you split them 24/26 for example
6 semesters seems kinda optimistic where I am from.
Hmmm
Idk how wai's situation works.
8
4 years
Ohhh
Often in the US you can just request a waiver of some sort through somebody to go above the cap.
They've reduced it
So the cap exists but can be worked around if you get permission
My mistake, bachelor's in EU are usually 6 sems and I extrapolated
Compulsory courses end after 3 here too
The 4tjh is to do research
Not really a study topic but how do you people try to maintain a healthy amount of work-time on PCs/mobile for college work/projects? Like staring at the projector screen for 4+ hrs daily in lectures then doing assignments on PCs/mobile really strains my eyes
how mamy credits is one course?
We have 3-4 credit classes and each credit is around 2 hours of work pretty solidly
so a 4 credit hour class is 8 hours of work
Mhm
For us a credit is normally an hour of classes a week
With most of my course being 4 credit
what do you study
well i mean idk how you avoid staring at a screen for 10 hours a day, thats literally what CSE is training you to do
you can try to do as much as you can on paper
do all your thinking on paper
@green terrace , just curioous did I share my soc course and time table with you ( I'd like to if that's fine with you)
Go ahead
hey Cat!
hey nerd wsp
this is my time table
religiously in this channel frfr
seems like a tough sem
Heavy but doable
and this is my SOC course description
ya, trying to do 23 credits every se
want to finish requirements except for my paper early so that I can do fun courses in year 4
oh valid, kinda what i did lol
i started taking grad courses in my 3rd year onwards
i guess bc your courses are 4 each then about 5-6 classes, still a lot (more than i can ever do) but yeah not bad
we have an 18 credit cap
we have a 25 credit cap
the course labled CCC is for 1.5 though
all of the math classes are also 3 credit hours but most other depts have 4 credits
idk why math is unique bc i sure am not only spending 6 hours per class 
context
i’m also taking RA this fall too tho
oh, nice
that's probably the easiest course I have this sem atp
I'm going to hate probability
alg1 is hard
SOC will eb hard
oh im the complete opposite
and a 500 level course..
algebra was really easy for me
:ope

analysis is going to kick my behind
we like algebra, it makes sense
i think algebra is much easier than analysis, so it feels like instructors compensate by making the sheer content of algebra in a single course much more than an analysis course
analysis is 
ehh i disagree; maybe it’s bc we have more analysis ppl in our dept than algebra but our algebra hws are easier than analysis
also in quantity
it of course depends on the course
idk, not to toot my own horn, but maybe i was just too good
(joking obv)
toot toot 
for example, aluffi prefaces by saying he intends for his book to be over 3 semesters but its usually in less than 2. my undergrad institution did it in 2/3 of a year and move on to finish atiyah macdonald for the rest of the year
i think that pace is just insane and i dropped midway through
henstien is so hard :(
and chat has died

is this engineering 😭
Pure maths
oh interesting
It's going to be hard but fun IMO
its only hard if you arent doing math every hour of the day
just do better
Hi
I got an D in algebra 1 an A in geometry an A in algebra 2 a B- in UW precalculus
I haven’t done math in like 3 years I was wondering if I could get an A in calc 1 at UW
Yeah
Wow rlly
Hm
Thx
Yeah you got it
uw stands for waterloo right?
yeah its possible to get an A in calc 1, just practice and you'll be fine
it usually stands for washington
fair enough
<@&268886789983436800> another one
maybe im too canadian / east coast based
I live in the US but know UW (waterloo) more than I think about washington lol
bad question, but would. self studying RA and group theory at the same time be a bad idea
what's RA?
real analysis?
yes
Not much conflict between them, also common for undergrads ig
to be taking the courses at the same time
yeah, but I've done around a 1/4 th of what my first course in RA will cover
have just scratched the surface of group thoery
If you are in a rush and you need to complete a topic, then maybe focusing on one is a better idea
The
reaction usually means "I agree with this post".
The 💯 reaction usually means "I agree 100% with this post".
if he already agrees with the post
then why would he reply with 💯 again
he alr agrees with it
To emphasize his agreement, I suppose.
If you do choose to go ahead with the RA + Group Theory. Def possible, it shouldnt be bad, and also, because we used baby hungerford, we started out with rings and fields first which made the class kinda easy early on instead of the amount of things we couldnt take for granted in group theory
but if its just a personal study, just focus on one thing and it would probs make the start of the semester a little easier so you can take that time to get adequate with the other
hmm, fair enough
can somebody summarize this im not gonna read the whole Quidditch rule
Not about maths but I don’t know that this channel is that specific, does anyone have any experience with self studying a language? I want to teach myself German (I know the absolute basics, like A1 level) and I don’t really know where to begin for self study.
Like I don’t know where to look for books and stuff because all the ones I’ve looked at so far have been entirely in German, presumably because they were designed for a classroom context, but not ideal for me right now
Aside from that how do people study? Flashcards with vocabulary and grammar rules? Listening to music, TV, reading etc is all obviously helpful too but aside from that, how’s best to approach it?
Talking to people is also obviously helpful (and not doing so is by far the reason why I’m still so shit at Spanish and French despite doing them in school) but thankfully my girlfriend and quite a few of our mutual friends are German so German speakers is actually the one thing I do have access to
wow! now i get it! thanks!
There's probably dedicated subreddits for learning languages with exhaustive lists of resources
For german, eg here
(Sidenote, description says any discussion related to studying and studying methods is fine, not just math
)
@long hedge my bad, i saw chatgpt and ignored the rest of your msg
i laughed
hii does anyone have any links to good practice tests/study material for linear algebra or calc 2 (mostly linear tho)? i’m struggling to find some good ones myself 😦
sadly my classes r online so they don’t offer any😔
I'm studying German currently but not as active as I used to do when I was learning Japanese and Arabic but essentially I am still doing what I used to do but less frequently. I put my first priority to grammar and supplement it with vocabulary (use Anki decks). Read novels and stuff you are interested in like in my case I read about math and culture. Join discord language exchange servers and vc with people there
What I find out is that keeping track of these gets harder as you grow up because you have other things to do in life + extra responsibilities
Hello everyone
I eager to learn Math every time, but ending up with difficulties (trying from grade 8 itself) and score 58 of 100 in grade 10
Not mean I can't do... I do very slowly and with a lot of confusions.. but everyone other than me grasping as light. and me can't kindly help
This may be dumb, but I don't have any other hope other than this..
Hi, An English literature guy wants to self study math - contradictory I know. Any piece of advice?
I’m more interested in the specifics though, where are you learning vocabulary and grammar from?
I feel like I have an ok understanding of the studying aspect, I’m just actually unsure of where to find any resources that work for self study, like all the books I’ve found have been entirely in German and I presume this is because it’s intended for a classroom setting with a German speaking teacher
I just consult websites. Try to get your hands on standardized German learning books for A2/B1 or whatever level you are comfortable with. I find some of the vocabulary useful and some are useless but I use these as a guide through the grammar aspect most of the time
Do mock exams (or maybe even attempt standardized tests)
What's your background?
it would highly depend on the quantity of work you'll put into it and the path you're willing to take
math is such a vast subject with very obscure branches
first try to delineate precisely what path you're heading on
is it more applied math stuff? more pure and theoretical? more programming oriented? puzzle, problem solving, and competition kind of math? try to find exactly where you'd like to go and you can build a path from there
if you're looking for some proof oriented work, your go to essentials imo right out of highschool are: formal logic and types of reasoning.
you need to know how to prove or disprove a statement, valid techniques, and the fallacies u might commit along the way. this type of stuff includes truth tables, inductive reasoning, the contrapositive of a statement etc
imo after that u can tackle everything else depending on the path you wanna take
calculus, linear algebra, number theory, all that
basic algebra, Calculus (Differentiation rules except for exponential functions and logs + except for integration by parts and partial fractions + I only know the mother Trigonometric Identity (sin²x+cos²x=1)), no geometry, A little knowledge about how Trigonometry works
Kinda about problem solving and a little bit of programming
What are your goals?
Oh yeah, and some of probobilites
self study is hard with no clear goals
set them up and don't let it be vague
make sure they're targetable and attainable
i want to be able to <...>
i want to read <...>
To improve my problem solving skills, to be able to calculate quickly when someone wants help with calculations, to be able to build projects that require complex math, and to turn it into a hobby and remove the fear of math
When you say projects, do you mean programming wise?
yeah
^^
It should be a good starter
discrete math can be fun too
Yeah discrete math is okay too. You get an exposure to some fields
as for calculating quickly that's a training thing more than anything
unless I'm misunderstanding
cus calculating quickly seems like arithmetics
I had fun with integration and imaginary numbers
I see these human calculators calculate 746 * 123 in seconds
,w 746 * 123
yeah is that what you're interested in?
quick arithmetics?
there's some techniques you can learn but other than that most of it is memory and practice
lots of practice
and some ppl are gifted
so they hone it exponentially
oh I got it
I'm not, so I let the computer do that for me 
that's what most of us do
math is less abt calculating stuff and more about proving stuff and making sure they work
we don't do that a lot ngl especially after calculators
and computers
Back in elementary school I used to use long division easily, now I don't know how to do normal division lol
i haven't seen a number since i started uni 
Yeah, it's a matter of practice
skills regress if not used that's normal
practice
there's lots of really fun stuff you can do in arithmetics it's not a barren field
number theory and modular arithmetics are really fun
bezout and shit
one of my fav courses in uni was modular arithmetics
That British content creator who manipulates in numbers and says "noine" I forgot his name
He does alot of stuff in arithmetics
yeaah
and then u can combine two fields to do fun stuff
modular arithmetics and linear algebra can be combined to create neat little encryptions
tada u peaked into Cybersecurity and cryptology
idk state a clear goal and work from there
if you're doing it for projects then discrete maths and linear algebra are your best bet
discrete math just means any math that's not continuous
so ud do graph theory, probability, arithmetics and all that jazz
since when is probability discrete
some probability is discrete if done with graph theory iirc
i snuck into one of them discrete classes and found them doing almost entirely probability
chains of markov iirc
in my eyes probability is both
depends how u approach it
coin flips are discrete
i haven't done lots of graph theory so i didn't really study markov yet
every security definition in cryptography is defined in terms of a discrete probability space
im unsure if this would be the place to ask the following question, but does anyone know methods to improve non verbal reasoning?
can you elaborate what you mean by non-verbal reasoning?
@swift tartan you know what I think you’re right… after dealing with product topology I kinda got my confidence crashed
I probably will lightly revise on analysis and as much LA as possible..
I have been through a transition that I kinda wanted to understand one big theorem of topology to that I can routine produce basic proof of topology
Life isn’t a sprint indeed
At this point after decoding the product topology and index gymnastics, I kinda realized how unrealistic the goal really is and worse I even developed some resistance to topology as it got increasingly more abstract. Which has been genuinely very awful since I am drawn in this study voluntarily feeling I might love it, but the past couple days I have been avoiding topology.
Personal perspective I have for now at the moment is to study a ton of linear algebra since the study I haven’t got stuck conceptually except the proof for la places formula which I expect to be able to do it in a couple weeks since the main barrier is the permutation group..
Some light abstract algebra and some basic topology spread over days.
Maybe I should just in general, give up the mindset that I would be such a failure if delayed graduation by longer than 1 year (not easy though, I have never been competitive however I struggle with the mindset that I might fail myself, I don’t expect excellence, however the uni course work always made me feel I might fail if I didn’t do anything perfect)
Do you think it’s more realistic now? I mean previously my style was kinda solving any problems and prove every proposition.. now I only do this for linear algebra and analysis, for abstract algebra and topology I will just do some exercises on the book instead of forcing me to study again and again till I prove everything
im really referring to the opposite of verbal thinking. so thoughts that come in the form of a visual sketchpad as opposed to words
"Life isn't a Sprint"
-Neam starting Abbott, 2022, Colorized
what year of uni are you?
honestly, to each their own. I cant really say if something like that is unrealistic bc it just depends on what you can handle. doing like 4 diff studies at the same time is a lot, but ppl can still do it. most will probs feel burnout but its not impossible
thats really just for you to figure out what you think is important
and also math and perfectionism doesnt go hand-in-hand, you will never know everything there is to know
Let me still label it as second year so maybe I felt not awful though.. and I do have regret pill
I mean if we talk about total it should be the third year
I would think that but some parts are very difficult so even with good time management it’s quite impossible
Must have been a prophet…
To be honest it’s not really protectionism the whole other way around. I almost always think I am gonna fail if not working hard enough, I personally don’t have much expectation on grades though Econ was easy and it would be nice to have that grade but my main fuel is really fear of being a failure
I don’t really know why people can be optimistic all the time, I felt people are all good or better than me, and be anxious everyday if I am not advancing.. like uni is very stressful and coursework is often demanding, I kinda developed mindset of being excessively scared of myself failing that made me into workaholism.. perfectionism no, I don’t care it that much i mean perfect is good but without it it’ll still be fine but what I fear is failing 😢
given that you did transfer from econ into math, maybe you are feeling similar to how I did when I switched over to math and I felt like I had so much to catch up on compared to ppl who wanted to do this since hs or when they started college. For me its imposter syndrome, ive been told im pretty good at what i do, but at the same time i always feel like I have so much more to learn and do and frankly from what I understand, it will never get better
For even my professors who have also won awards and recognition at conferences and gotten distinguished titles at my uni, like if they have imposter syndrome too, idek if i can compare to how they may feel
its kinda just something you have to cope with and i personally look at it as a way like "oh there is so much more to learn and i can keep pushing myself to do better" and just bc you are cognizant of it doesnt mean that it will just go away
i know for some thats a lot to do and may sway them away, but i guess it just comes with the territory
I guess being tenacious is a merit of its own to a degree? idk if i am using that word right
but just stubbornly pushing forward
also lmfaooo you have so much time
if i could go back and just relax throughout my ug, i def would instead of stressing over falling behind and just constantly working at all times
i started my math major in my 2nd year, i also took calc courses my 1st year from Calc I onwards. And I finished the math degree in my first sem of my 3rd year and have been just taking grad courses and added another major on top of it
Switching from CS to maths for my final year and I am currently struggling with writing proofs. The course catalog for maths majors at my uni does not seem to explicitly have a course about proofs and I am a tad lost on what to do
Lots of excellent book recommendations exists - are there any other resources that would be helpful?
math major in general is pretty short comparatively to other degrees (at my uni which is more extensive than others we have around 24ish credits so like 8ish math classes?)
3 years here in Sweden
can i ask what made you drop the cs major in your final year?
Very few interesting courses, most seem to focus on applying concepts rather than exploring the theory behind CS
yeah and i condensed that down to basically a year and half for me 💀
damn
yeah tbf thats basically how cs is. If you had already taken algorithms + data structures, and ofc the discrete maths course that comes at the start for most cs programs, then i would just focus on trying to practice those proof techniques? You basically have all the ingredients and have applied some of them
The CS program just doesnt really care for super extensive proof writing
but it does matter for math, and also the diff proof techniques you learned from discrete like contrapositive, contradiction, direct, and induction; for cs usually youd only see induction, but for math you use all of them 10x-fold
I am trying my best to prove each theorem in my discrete maths book and logic but I feel like I am missing a foundation
Yep
also i was originally a cs major too but i switched out of it after 1st year, and just added it back this jan
Which is what scares me as my thesis will be on maths
big oof
I don't need to repeat a year which is nice
im certain you have already looked at or been recommended many different proof textbooks, but imo Book of Proofs by Richard Hammack (free and online by publisher/author), is a personal favourite
they instruct you on what you should technically be looking at when you are reading a math textbook
and also creating a kinda formulaic proof structure (which one might phase out of after getting comfortable)
Id say the formulaic proof structure might be a little more beneficial bc of your cs background, and it does a little introduction of diff ug math classes that one might take
also have you taken any math classes yet?
usually the point of ug math classes is to learn such skills, they dont expect you to be perfect from the start
I have not heard nor read about this book, I'll definetely have a look now
This is what I exactly need
yeah nws
I need baby steps, small baby steps before being a big boy and writing freestyle
thanks for the recommendation siracha
Sri*
You did that too? Switching to math as an advanced student? Did you manage to retain as a second year or start as first year completely?
Though it’s kinda hard to really be unstressed.. like imposter syndrome is stubborn
Personally perspective, it’s actually quite effective and efficient to memorize definitions and then construct the proof oneself. Usually pretty easy and then see how much it matches the book
I don’t know.. like when I was at the measure course they often force you to make argumentation as concise as possible it’s torturous process for my then strength also my current strength but it’s quite effective in helping you learning the crucial parts of math proof
I managed to retain my second year so I'll be starting as a third year
One minute I am proudly proclaiming "This is easy! I am the smartest man alive!".. then realize my answer is wrong and I loudly proclaim "This is hard! I am the dumbest man alive!"
yes
is this how I find out that you are my classmate? 🤔
SU?
nope
guess you are at UU?
rip
the Frescati campus is beautiful though
Albano is too brutalistic and modern agh
Lund?
🤔
Do you know someone called Solveig?
ah, she was a classmate of mine at high school
worth a shot, small world yknow
what's the exam?
is that not in the third year?
damn you grinding
I believe the course is read during the third year of maths at SU
the prerequisites are 60hp yup
Don't know, SU is kinda wacky with the names
Year 3, field of study in mathematics
At SU there is 3 major maths programs
One is mathematics, one is mathematics and statistical mathematics and lastly there is mathematics and computer science
then of course.. there are I think 3 more variants
It is really nice, professors are super social and helpful
Only bummer is the student life but if you manage to make a friend or two it's fun
I'll be reading this coming term now
I need it to graduate with a BSc in maths lol
I believe that the combinatorics course is recorded as well
If you have an SU account you can watch the lectures
same
The recorded lectures are not lectures per say but well edited videos, 5-18 min each
yours is probably better than mine
I keep getting lost at the campus trying to find the right seminar room
ha.. I avoid those
they give me a false sense of understanding... and I go around acting like I actually understand it lol
They don't have CS, only computer engineer
My friends study there, it is more or less the same courses as we read at SU, suprisingly
nice
Funny enough, I work as a TA at the CS and System science department and two colleauges have studied at LTH*
Most of them praise the school, others... nein
Yup
EU?
UK?
maybe scotland?
Australian!
I thought they were apart of Schewez thingy
hmmm
Ukranian?
what continent?
Switzerland?
omg
my eye doctor Jurg is from Switzerland
yes
dont know
EYO
He works at S:t Eriksögonsjukhus which is the only speciality eye hospital in Sweden
ok maybe I should not dox my doctor
Yes
Solna
not on days when soccer matches are held...
soo.
can anyone give me tips on Verbal Reasoning, Non-Verbal Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning, and Spatial Reasoning
for a cat4 test
exercise regularly and eat healthily long in advance. learn mental math. there are books that will teach you add and multiply 5 digit numbers (and decimals) in your head, those trivialize some of the quantitative reasoning exams.
finally, read regularly and write down a word you dont know each time you come across it to learn it
each of the above is good to do irrespective of any test you’ll take
Ty
hi excuse me, where is the discussion channel?
i think they’re just trying not to dox themselves by giving the course codes
wdym, you can’t see it?
u cant see the social channels when u have studying role
i can’t read, my bad. thought you were responding to one post above you
very worried for next years major exam
i need to have very high efficiency and accuracy in maths
for 2 hours straight
most literate math major be like:
real
so my course uses halmos and hoffman ( glorified LA), how cooked am I
You're gonna cook
🙏
no, I'm cooked
Gl
If you think you are cooked, you will be cooked
My LA course seems to use a very computational heavy book from Cambridge
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
I have been doing proofs, I almost never practice computation. I am almost half way proving laplace formula (after acquiring permutation group it’s probably doable). I will just dive into those intriguing trace based formula for fast computation

keep it on topic please
I had computational LA as well
It was supposed to be abstract but TA chosen to teach us computational things
A week on elimination method lol
Damn
We hardly did a few proofs
"in this world, it's either cook or be cooked."
The thing is I haven’t been practice for numerical arithmetics in context of massive determinant computation (probably not gonna be very hard I have a bit confidence with la now).. I almost do everything symbolically
So I am a bit scared
And it’s often very effective to use traced based formula for Linear Algebra arithmetics like characteristic polynomial , it’s a master formula and you just derive though it’s significantly more complicated if it goes beyond 3*3 matrices. A bit scared with it
Probably will be fine? I’m not sure, since symbolic manipulation can be mirrored easily
Unc couldn't take a joke
Das wassup my man😎
:/ who let the robloxers on here
anyone have notebook recs
last time i asked i got a rec for a rhodia dotpad and i really liked that
I have heard good things about Moleskine
We used a sligthly computational book, but being a coward I used axler
computational as in?
like I had to compute stuff aswell as prove stuff
like find the basis of a vector space
( axler doesn't ask me to do such stuff)
yeah
Some inattention will lead to unspotted mistakes
proofs are much easier in general
depends on the goal of the class....it wouldn't make much sense in a Pure Math setting
However usually symbolic method has logical chains easier for tracing back
I think the goal of these classes is to get you acquainted with basics of Proof writing, which you can later extrapolate to more advanced classes
I mean what kinda of proof in LA can exceed difficulty topologies and radon nikodym
I think it’s for foundational procedural skill though but essentially the same
Proof at basic level is more straightforward
I am taking a different route however. I am learning Number Theory as my intro to math with some basics of Propositional and Predicate Logic down beforehand.
Number theory is very hard
It requires a huge amount of algebraic tool to do arithmetics
I see. It reads very accessibly so far, although I haven't done much of it tbh.
Like use bare hand for extended Euclid algorithm is insane
You from brown?
no lol
Almost triggered my jealousy
I am new to math so hopefully it’s not that computational
I just happen to find out about the book by perusing Stack Exchange and related sites
lmao I don't have much experience with math (perhaps some seasoned folks here might be able to tell better) but writing proofs is very non-trivial at times. I find myself many times baffled at the inferential leaps in the proofs and try to re-create scenarios where I could have gotten the right instincts to make that logical leap.
with computational problems you can group certain problems requiring a certain algorithm/procedure and re-use the same computational patterns with wide variety of problems
so if you do a lot of them, you usually get a sense of how to do almost most of them
akin to how competitive programming or leetcoding is practiced by CS students
I just think in general computation is more exhausting and unnice
i think the opposite ngl
i think at some point long computations like an integral or solving a de/pde just become attention to detail
Chat, how does one git gud at maths
Practice. Lots of exercises. Use it constructively when you have to look up a solution -- that is, spend some serious time trying to distill it down toba strategy you could have found the solution with yourself.
Think a lot too, usually if you know where you have mistakes it would be very very easy
Proofs are the same, it’s just that you rely on prior established results to reach the first principle
Usually you want psychologists I believe
I do not know
Solve the exercises
In my opinion, it can be done very quickly
I don’t actually, provided I can’t even imagine how it’s not done.. sorry please ask someone else
As many as possible, if you are stuck, you can use this server for help 
sometimes i get this feeling too, although its nice to get a hint or whatever after some point. sometimes when im typing up my question i realize a solution lol
Probably relevant to what you said above
You are embarrassed asking for help online, I am not even slightly embarrassed when asking for help IRL, we are not the same
I kinda understand
but nobody is being forced to help you, so I wouldn't be too concerned
Online, people feel way more confident taking potshots at people for a perceived lack of effort of the asker's side as well.
Whereas in person the conversation goes
'Hi can you help me with x'
'What do you mean by x'
'I'm not even sure, sorry'
'Ok lets take a step back and work towards it'
or some such
People are generally actually pretty nice in this Discord imo but I see it a lot in other servers
idk
I feel like irl you would only ask in a place that's offering help formally
and they have guidance on conduct and/or you're paying for it directly or indirectly
if you mean just asking a peer in class, that sounds too ideal
Not to be 'nuh uh' but I think that's mostly rhetoric.
-
This server is ostensibly a place offering help (albeit implicitly), since both there are channels per topic and a dedicated question triage section. So I'd argue that while one should use those areas, it may be the case that a new (or socially awkward) user doesn't know to use them or simply forgets.
-
Experiences differ of course, but conversations in class are normally very respectful and work-oriented. I try to treat it like a workplace and I think most of my peers do too. There's of course exceptions: I remember one gentleman taking his shirt off mid lecture for seemingly no reason, and another class where three friends were all on their laptops Discord-messaging each other with audible giggles, so I'm not pretending unis don't have weird people out there. But it's the exception to the rule.
... ok then
good for you, I guess
Yeah I mean as long as you ask questions that make sense and aren't silly, I don't see a reason why someone here wouldn't help you
Unless you purposefully ask people to check your majestic Collatz proof
Or asking how to find the side length of a right angle triangle in #algebraic-geometry
did someone say COLLATZ?! 
usually if you ask a question people will redirect you to the right channel if it's not in the scope or focus. if it's high school homework-style you can use the help channels as you described before
if it's some other math question you can try #math-discussion
Hi! I’ve written a mathematical demonstration related to tilings and prime number within Pascal’s triangle, and I’d really like to get some feedback on it. Could you please tell me which channel would be the most appropriate place to share it? ( it's not short it requieres a good hour to read it )
Thanks a lot in advance!
Anyone wanna study mathematics together?
Depends on what kind of math
What do you study?
@strong tree welcome to the mathcord! 
your best bet is probably in #math-discussion, I think? 
but it may be overlooked due to its length
yep that's the problem it's kinda long so no one really want to read it and focus more on helping quick question this is why i wanted to know if their was any more appropriate chanel but thx i'll try
one by one
true
i like how
this is basically the only channel not on fire
because i don't think everyone has access to this one
Yep, we can talk about math and studying here.
I'm currently relearning Algebra 2. I know eventually, I have to learn how to divide polynomials by other polynomials again, so I hope coming back to that isn't too hard.
I know how to do it if there's no remainder, but not when there is a remainder. I forgot about that part.
Do you use long division or synthetic division? Its not too complicated, I can try walking you through it if youd like :)
Real sigmas would use this to chat as it has no time limit
I don't remember, but maybe synthetic division?
Type shi
A person who thinks all the time…
Synthetic is a shortcut that works really well when dividing by first order polynomials
You should prolly learn long division first
Okay, I'll learn long division (for polynomials) first.
One ping and suddenly half the server is vocal about their political opinions
Any recommendation to learn queuing theory? Although I have very phew time because my thesis is about that
Probably I said a wrong expression. Seems my English is not in its best shape now
I was trying to find out where a beginner would go to try to understand proofs (the way I phrased this can seem broad) for the first time but I suppose reading some of the pins here will suffice but I would like some additional insight too. The channels are a little overwhelming and that is probably on my end because I tried to look into a few channels but there's definitely a lot of stuff I don't understand apart from the calculus course I enrolled in during the summer so I need to start somewhere
I don't want to feel like I only wanted to bother with this server because of an everyone ping so here is a legitimate concern (do ping me if you reply because I have a feeling this will be lost within the messages)
hi guys im a high school senior and i want to take the SAT, what are some tips for somebody who is really bad at math?
im canadian so i never took the SAT, but ive taken other standardized tests so this is just general test advice.
do practice tests, all the ones that are available. figure out where your weak spots are; types of questions, concepts, etc. and tackle those. track how long it takes you, what questions you get stuck on etc.
do not go into the exam with a concept unclear. make sure you understand all that you need to know. if you need help, ask your teachers, ask in this discord, ask any friends/siblings/cousins in higher grades.
use online resources like khanacademy, organic chemistry tutor (on youtube), etc. to understand concepts
and for this last tip, idk if this is really relevant to the SAT, but one of the ways i improved a lot at math is dont just do homework. you have to UNDERSTAND whats going on, in order to apply those concepts
i have a hard time remembering concepts, i do well in class and i ace all my tests but i struggle with foundational algebra
what i mean by that last point, ill use the place i started doing it; with logarithms for my test. instead of just doing homework questions, i went on desmos for a few hours and just practiced every possible situation. my teacher only had examples of log(f(x)) where f(x) was linear. but what if its quadratic? what would that graph look like? what about a function in the form b^f(x), where f(x) is quadratic? what does that look like? and guess what, on the test, there was a question where it WAS quadratic that wasnt in the homework. i knew how to do it, because i spent all that time fully understanding the concept of logarithms and exponential functions
i have been doing that but i still struggle so much in math TwT thank you so much for the tips, im just not sure why I am so bad at math and if anyone feels the same way?
im really bad at math, thats why i decided to pursue a biology degree LOL
but ive got to a point where i can get through math 💀
^
you may not be able to get a good grasp on contest math that requires abstract thinking, but you can definitely get to a point where you can do SAT math problems with relative ease
thats what i mainly struggle with ^, contest math lol
Oh i see okay so practice things that arent on homework
i see
i think so too but im really good at geometry and trigonometry
yeah from what ive seen, this is often the problem with ppl who think they are bad at math
i tutored younger students in math last year
and many of them lacked foundational skills, which carried over as they tried to learn new concepts
im also really bad at problem solving too
problem solving can be challenging, but from my exp
if you do enough practice, it reaches a point of pattern recognition
a pretty decent time actually, i get stuck on it for a while, but if im completely blanked on what an equation means ill look really fast
and slowly, you learn methods to approach problems
so basically practice my heart out
this is real asf
blanking on a problem can be really time consuming but one of my biggest weaknesses was always that
i mess up a question and immediately check the asnwer key
because im too lazy to try to find where i went wrong
go to cb question bank and select areas youre bad at and solve those
ooo
a long time ago
in 9th grade
do you suggest i read it
meaning i shouldnt?
ooo
heres my results from my first SAT
ngl for the sat i assumed you just need to do a bunch of problems. thats how i aced the reading/writing section. i thought the consensus was the same with math. of course, you should gain understanding naturally by doing lots of problems. thats one way to gain mathematical intuition
i never prepared for the math section of the sat so i cannot give tailored advice
i didnt get perfect
I never practiced for the reading and writing section and I got a good score
But the issue was math for me, I recently worked out some algebra kinks and I did really well, I find my problem is now in Advanced Math lol
That I’m assuming I’m gonna have to khan academy, that way it’s not too hard for me
@rain patio welcome to the mathcord c:
What was your score
axkyn
Do you have any advice on planning to complete a problem book, similar to Engel’s Problem Solving Strategies? Also, how much time should I expect it to take?
If you are asking about general ug math texts, just read through the chapter and answer from a quarter to half the questions from the middle section to the end; that’s usually the best practice bc usually the first questions are like a sanity check when going through textbooks
generally a chapter and doing the questions ofc depends on the person but a course would probs dedicate a week or two to a single section/chapter but that ofc depends on the density of the section itself ofc
i’d estimate around a week to go through those select few problems you chose bc you don’t need to tackle all the problems just bc they are offered
yeah I was not thinking in "study for the test/course" but ,more into getting better at undergraduate mathematics as a topic. but yeah I think the main idea is to prioritize
if that’s the case, the more practice the merrier
Eh, similar advice tbh. Except this would be much easier to manage than a research project.
So have fun!
yeah, I was thinking on the "grind" of going trough all the problems of some "hard" books.
yeah for the harder textbooks, it’s fine even if the chapter takes somewhere between 2-3 weeks even it’s just a matter for how much you are willing to dedicate, but i would state that if it’s taking a solid 3 weeks of dedicated work you are likely doing something wrong and should try to reconsider the approach to the section/chapter
usually means that you understood the content wrong
that’s my rule of thumb that nothing more than 2 weeks of half effort work
half effort meaning doing it in my free time
Sri sorry to ask again, I'd like to get into analysis but I haven't done much proofs work (only up to calc 3), how should i begin?
thanks , I guess the hardest part will be more the psychological or something similar, but thanks again for the advice.
definitely the psych factor does take a hit sometimes but it’s a matter of diligence and it’s also completely fine admitting defeat but also more important to learn from that experience
it’s alright to search up questions if you have zero clue
but doesn’t mean to get into the habit ofc
yeah , I would say the loneliness of working on stuff no one rather than me will care on that specific moment will be the hardest part, but will be an interesting process.
i think nothing is better than just going into the content but maybe pursuing lighter material might help rather than jumping into the river
usually some unis offer an intro to RA as one of their intro to proof classes
MIT ocw does this for one
My uni does too
I'll check out ocw, hb textbooks?
beginner friendly ones, that are kinda intro to proof w/ real/compex analysis
I never really liked Abbott but that seems to be a favorite here, I liked Ross’s text , and Adams text for it both are available online for free
understanding analysis is a good one. for friendly real analysis
ahh lol, repeated answer
I'll buy them tonight and get started on them when im able
Abbott just seemed too surface level imo
true, but good for intro to proofs.
I am not particularly leading a reading group in RA but just tackling a couple of problems here and there of the Rudin text before my sem starts
yeah this is true
Literally not 
Rudin and Abbott have 85% similar content
oh gurl
no 😭
Perhaps I used the wrong word? But I still feel it doesn’t go as in depth with the content compared to Rudin and Pugh
I just pulled my copy up to verify and confirm what i felt
I looked through it during a reading group this spring early summer
Also cc @dim dirge
Maybe it could also be that I personally found that it was also a lot easier of a problem bank for me comparatively to that of rudin
Our uni uses Abbott for intro to real compared to real
My prof used Ross text and Adam’s text tho for my intro to real course
yeah that’s how i feel
I felt like it just touched the beginnings of each topic mentioned in Rudin but it didn’t explore too far beyond that
we have another prof in our dept who uses Abbott for intro to real so i’ll ask a friend and see what they took away
The proofs are just harder
Honestly this might be the reason why I feel such way perhaps
I do recall that I kinda zoomed through Abbott compared to Rudin
So who knows could def be a biased perspective
I liked Pugh though, excellent exposition imo and good questions
1150
thats why i use easy stuff
abott
hm are you a freshmen
You get stronger through practice and honestly this may sound annoying but there isn’t really anyway around it honestly. You learn proof writing from ways that the thm is written and once you finish a problem verification is important but also shows possible fallacies in your own proof
@icy beacon ^
Just because you do Hammack over and over again it wouldn’t help past the foundations or basics
Yeah I think my approach is wrong and I’m not active enough while reading. I thought about doing hammack alongside Shilov’s linear algebra which I’m currently using but I despise “how to” books for some reason.
;-;
You learn proof writing from ways that the thm is written and once you finish a problem verification is important but also shows possible fallacies in your own proof
This last part is esp true, and if you are in uni, your prof should def help if you copy down the proof or atleast the idea of how they prove things
The point of intro level classes is ofc to get introduced to maths, but at the same time, you kinda also subconsciously pick up diff proof methods and make it your own
For example, I learned induction differently in 3 diff intro lvl classes (proofs, lin alg, and intro to real analysis), but the prof who taught the last one made induction so uniquely easy
imo not really bc maybe ive gone too far that the problems themselves are a little too easy, but the methods they give lowk are more formulaic that it doesnt help too much in the long run
like hammack is a great text, but their proof method feels like im writing code
it helped out early on, but i like my style more now
This is also what i mean by its very formulaic, and each time when you input a then statement, you also add a thus at the end
Like nice idea tho
At some point it feels like writing an algorithm or a code. It gets very unfun
Yeah I like a bit of pizzaz in my proofs
You know what's really annoying? I have to take two courses that feel like this for my degree. Both of which come from the cs department
i cant wait until I use the most english words and have exquisitely picked out words from the dictionary
yeah dang
can i dm you something a prof this spring did?
the average math class is oike "yeah follows from induction" and these two classes feel like:
Proof:
......
....
...
Therefore ....
Therefore....
Therefore...
it was messy as hell
oh god
I like this tho tbh
skinwalker, get out of my head 
yeah, same!
u know, it's like dividing your thoughts into paragraphs and such xd
just looks cleaner
ESPECIALLY, for simple and short proofs like that
tickles my brain somehow
maybe because i'm into algos and TCS 
You say this till you realize you get docked marks for stupid things like "not following the procedure of the proof"
omg that class was a nightmare lmao
well that was the profs fault
it has nothing to do with this style being nice*
-# *for short proofs
It is nice and pleasant for the eye but it just feels too robotic if that makes sense
i meant his work in computer-assisted proofs
what the hell
I do this but with fibonacci tab unintentionally
Me writing an analysis proof, running out of the words that are synonyms with "therefore" be like
$$ \text{{shit happens here}} \iff \text{{other shit}} $$
emilia
i wanna try writing a complicated proof with absolutely NO words of explanation, just quantifiers and other logical symbols 
preferably so that a prof I dislike would have to read that 
I swear I'm literally just spamming "therefore, so, thus, it follows that..."
"since [...], we have"
Yes hence is a good one
I should make a list
C l e a r l y
trivially
Whence
ngl it annoys me when ppl say from whence
like it sounds nice, but youre just saying "from from where"
from whence did you get this annoyance?🤡
iirc it’s just a shortened “where hence forth” that’s more so what i get from it
it’s like a timeline / describing the origin of something
I need some guidance, and I thought that this might be the place to get it since I’m mostly isolated. Here is some context: this year I’m going to move from 10th grade to 11th grade. I did Calculus BC last year and will likely do Calculus 3 next year (US maths is not very advanced tbh). During the last couple years, I have gotten more interested in maths and have started watching and solving math videos (Mind your decisions, black pen blue pen, etc). Also, I attempted to do AMC 10 and got only 49.5 (damn). I want to do more math questions and get better at it, but I am not certain exactly where to start. I’m at the point where I’m too dumb to do competition math but also want to git gud. So, if anyone has any suggestions, it would be much appreciated. (Ironic how my last question was to just "git gud" I guess I backtracked hard)
Honestly, contrary to popular belief, competition math is just competition math its meant to just have fun
Sure you can do it, if you win that looks cool, but it relatively "improves your critical thinking skills" but I wouldnt say it makes you "better at math"
Since it sounds you are in hs, dont worry about whats going to happen in college or future. Just focus on what you have now and whats available to you and just try to be diligent and good at it
also mind you, competition math are generally topics from most common areas of math but comparatively easier than a ug or esp a grad course. Its usually a little more challenging bc most dont do proof writing in hs, but also familiarity of content material
yeah looking back at competition math like AMC made me realize (maybe just due to mathematical maturity) but its not that bad
But thats also why there is specifically collegiate math comps too tho
Its def a lot harder even for grad students
For one competition some may know from the US, called the Putnam Exam
But also recognize, if you took the classes that the Putnam Exam usually includes, youd have a pretty good chance to atleast get 2+ questions but also being able to have enough brain to understand is another thing lol
Thats why most seniors do well on the Putnam
this is not true
Can we discuss this in #math-discussion , id like to know more tho
we did not end up discussing 
LOL
Both are pre mid ngl
Actually I think it does compared to what most people do in school.
The basic thing of having ever tried problems where you weren't given the algorithm to solve them in advance is pretty useful
Having ever figured out how to solve a problem without already knowing in advance is rather unlike most early exposure to mathematics.
I have noticed that if you give something that is not instantly recognizable as one of the preknown forms of problem to even a good student in a stem field, they will often just... sit there... not seeming to do anything or think of anything... or give up immediately. Seemingly this is because they do not have the skill of how to work on a problem they don't know how to solve, or stuff like "play with it" or "try some small examples".
i’m at odds, some points i agree with and definitely changed my perspective but not completely. I think you are right that competition math does make them more adaptable at facing new challenges and overcoming them, which usually involves some sort of algorithmic approach. But, I can say this about almost anything else because people like to do what they are willing to put interest in. I have to say specifically for hs and lower level competitions it doesn’t provide anything beyond than just being able to memorize and use such calculations.
I guess to put this into context, for example being a programmer I can learn as many languages as I can and I can also output the right code for the program at need. However, if i wanted to be a “good computer scientist” and not just go into industry or apply myself, aka academia, then it doesn’t really serve me much help just because i know a little of everything rather than the theory. Ofc this last statement is purely subjective with a clear goal of academia in mind.
It’s a useful skill set for any point in life, but I think as a hs; i’d honestly just recommend trying to enjoy it and do stuff that’s fun for them instead of worrying if it makes them better at something
I hope this last part summarizes better what i was trying to say
Also we can actually move this to #math-discussion for the future of the convo and just tag me
how do i drop the study role
In #bots ,iamnot studying
ty ty
hs and below competitions definitely have problems that aren't just rote computation


It's done. Last exam over
One of the most brutal semesters ive ever had and school already starts next monday
Oof
Its over at least
Good luck for next sem

hiiiii
yey :D
omg really?
wow
this is impressive 
iirc previous time you were studying some like inf - inf categories
or omega categories something
mhm, that’s what they’re called
then I had an arc doing some more elementary cat theory
sure sure 
i would store that information for my future use--when i will officially learn cat theory 
Best of luck Pseudo

i would try to keep checking your arc, and i hope i will learn something new as well 
The main thing I’d like to share is a different notation
Which makes a lotta results visually transparent
TRANSparent?

we've got transparent, where's my cischild results
(probably) weird question: does anybody know of any platform/website/app/whatever that gives you random problems based on difficulty on determined math topics that also has solutions + explanations?
Ideally i'd be able to just open the thing and get a random problem to solve daily. Primarily word problems
At what level?
undergrad, grad, or hs?
Do you have a lot of samples?
I would argue that the best way to prepare to this kind of test is just by doing a lot of them
8 is good
When I am studying for my exams i'll do about this amount of previous exams
in the best case
I struggle w this exams because i know the math to solve it, not WHERE to apply it
And its very frustrating tbh
If you know the math, studying more the math itself won't be very useful for you
if the issue is to apply what you know
the best way is to try to apply, understand what is asked
if you make an error
why did you make this error
By solving the math, do you mean just the arithmetic, and not knowing when to use which arithmetic operation to solve a problem?
The only field where i'd like to learn the math is geometry, I'm weaker on that spot
i'm not sure. I'm studying math to get better at 3d graphics programming, and since i'm dumb it's going to take me a lot more effort to understand and remember
referring to this, sorry
Won't it be hard because of the language
If I sometimes struggle with my own language, I can't imagine with English 😅
Np
Wdym? Sorry if i do not understand
no worries you can always translate, or you can just try to do it
and if you're lost you ping me and I'll try to help
Ok
Are you from the US?
Cause idk if our time zones coincide in an appropriate time
My parents won't let me if it is too late
😔
Yeah no worries, I guess the better question is: What do you mean by you are able to know the math for the problem but not know when to solve it?
its based off of this message
It sounds like you have up to three distinct problems here:
- What you can't change: That admission to a serious institution of learning you want to enter is based on a math contest -- your example test explicitly identifies itself as a contest, and at some of the questions are clearly contest-style, e.g. number 18 and especially 22.
- Language: Without a good command of mathematical English you may end up wondering whether a word in a question that you don't recognize is a precise mathematical term or just a "flavor" word from the motivating story. There's probably no other way to improve on that than to get as many previous tests as you can and go meticulously over them and make sure you know every word, mathematical or not. Then hope that this sampling has covered all the mathematical terminology you'll need.
- You write "I know the math to solve it, not WHERE to apply it." That sounds like you might be saying you can only answer the question once it has been reduced to a symbolic form that tells you which procedure to apply. But if so, that means you have not really learned those procedures yet. It's not enough to be able to perform it; learning it also means you must intuitively understand what the procedure achieves, well enough to be able to recognize when that procedure is what you need. To remedy that, I think the best you can do is to be critical when you read solutions to this kind of problem: Don't feel satisfied just because you can follow the calculations in the solution; you must also for each such solution spend time understanding why those calculations gave the answer the question wanted.
^^^^
Yeah that third part was what I was trying to understand more of but thats really the main issue
Like for math, being able to be told "do xyz on this problem" is easy to do, but being able to recognize when to do it on your own is what actually shows proficiency
A lot of ppl I tutor struggle with this and they usually quickly pick up the content/material because once they understand that sort of "situational awareness" but to a math problem they usually are good to go and are chilling for the rest of the year
Practicing is really the key as youve been told before
I get what you said there on point 3. Which I believe is the closest way of describing my problem. This comes from my educational system. Specifically, from my school itself. We usually see exercises on exams where the operation needed is given explicitly unless it is an "extra exercise". Those are somewhat difficult only because they make you mix the concepts or make you deduce which concepts to use.
Obviously, none of this helps when you're doing an exam like this, and it's a pity my school (and lots more in Spain) teaches like this.
Per your recommendations, I'll try completing the exams, and giving you feedback if I struggle somewhere (if you'd like to help me further).
I don't know if this might be a good idea, but do you guys think that I could try using ChatGPT to ask how to resolve questions after finishing and reviewing the test?
And @halcyon wave, can I send you a DM in case we review exercises?
ChatGPT for math help should be approached extremely carefully. Sometimes it produces good and useful explanations. At other times it can make horribly wrong claims -- and it is very, very good at making its horribly wrong claims sound authoritative and convincing. So if you use it at all, you MUST be on the lookout for mistakes, and not trust anything it says unless you've really convinced yourself that you believe it because you can see for itself that it must be true, rather than because a bot on the internet says so.
Thanks for the help! Really appreciate your work 🫡 😊
yes
I am personally in the old school boat that I dont at all recommend chatgpt. I have seen it be used and also provide atrociously bad results (even the new one is still bad). Its just not great at critical thinking
So if you use it at all, you MUST be on the lookout for mistakes, and not trust anything it says unless you've really convinced yourself that you believe it because you can see for itself that it must be true, rather than because a bot on the internet says so.
At this point, imo, you might as well just do it yourself and learning via the textbook lol. Also google and stack exchange are good friends
But it is definitely the future, I just dont think its all there yet
I think GPT is great for many things but for most math you learn in school there's so many high-quality free resources out there already that I don't see what the point of using it is
I meannnn earlier real analysis proofs are easy to understand : D
so out of curiosity what is the best and quickest way to learn like college algebra
Like linear alg
(i've never properly studied so i have no clue)
what is college algebra
Um
Abstract alg then?
Troposphere can carry big
But
I think ur talking about linear alg and stuff
Maybe abstract alg
I think someone once explained to me that "college algebra" is a euphemism for "high-school algebra, but taught at a college as a remedial course".
So like algebra 1 
I don't know about "<topic> <number>" divisions.
uhh it's like linear algebra
remedial is a whole other class
apologies for being confusing i'm so tired
Does linear alg have at least some form of Galois theory 
I know it’s in abstract alg but still
i looked it up and it said yes
Ring theory?
i've got no clue



