#study-discussion
1 messages · Page 4 of 1
i saw a video on various ways to stop doing nothing
support the channel on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/thisscience
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/basically_him/
merch: https://thismerch.com/
this
it's about procrastination
but tbh it works for just getting into work you know
By the way how old are you?
i feel like it should work for it too
same as you but born in january
Oh nice.
Let me see this video first.
@flint bobcat good night man.!
good night to u too mate

You should differentiate yourself, NOW
yes
Wow. So true. I await your ban 🙏
why?
Why should I get banned?
Im just stating that harvey shrek is beatiful in its own way
what did I come to
Is free speech banned?
it's just disturbing
You apparently didn't read that this channel is called #study-discussion
"discussion"

<@&268886789983436800> 
imagine thinking this server is the american govt.
please submit your taxes to me
@solar cipher go shitpost in #chill
actually no u were already warned a few hrs ago. take a day off
like 6 hours? But diff textbooks tho
but what if I live and work in Europe?
-# America: "nah, I need ur taxes anyway" 
This is true, famously Europe does not have freedom of speech
hello, if i want to learn how to do tasks like these, where should i learn from? Or what exactly to look for because i didn't find anything similar anywhere so far
The task is to simplify them, yet whenever i do that i end up making them even more complicated 🥲
There's some useful things in Paul's notes https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/Radicals.aspx particularly the last few examples and the practice/assignment problems, though these are a bit too basic and what you really want to learn is how to multiply and divide fractions with radical expressions. (A quick search for "fractions with radical expressions" doesn't seem to immediately return problems like these though)
The key here is to recall the properties of the square root and common algebraic identities like (a+b)(a-b)=a²-b² to simplify, or rationalize the denominator and numerator as you evaluate the expression, so you could also look into online resources that teach rationalization of fractions involving radicals
How do we ace our maths test
gotta do practice problems
from the homework, the textbook, any exercises given in lecture, etc etc
and you have to actually understand all the definitions and results, be able to give examples and counterexamples where necessary
even if you won't be asked "give an example of this result," thinking of such examples helps build intuition and understanding
and then of course if you can't do homework and textbook problems while you have time and leisure at home, you won't be able to do them under a time pressure
any more specific advice would need more information from you as to what you specifically struggle with
Knowing your teacher helps too. At least, my college math professors either hinted or fairly blunt what type of problems were on the tests themselves. So you can usually practice those to guarentee a passing grade
I wouldn't count on it.
I remember after my honors analysis class in UG I found an old AMC 10 and self administered it to just see how I’d have done. I think I just barely did well enough to have qualified for AIME that year.
I was not “an average pure math student say who just graduated”, I was still in my degree, but I did have zero Olympiad experience
Chmonkey, the above average pure math student
Neamesis, the eternal cat gamer pfp
Hello peeps, i am preparing for jee advanced, and i need help with maths, its taking a toll on me, right now I dont have any specific questions, but if you could guide me how to study maths, i would be grateful for your help, i can say its difficulty is around Bsc level
As someone who has written JEE adv and is perusing a BSc degree, I can say that last bit is false
the right word would be "competition math", which is different from the math you may encounter in a degree. you cant really compare their "difficulties" (whatever that means)
Idk, when my coaching teachers explained the difficulty they said its bsc level
Oh, i dont know if i could define that way
How do i prepare for maths? Please any advice
Will coaching modules suffice?
Because whenever i encounter a new problem, i cannot solve it, i am unable to build concept and problem solving skills
Mostly should, if they are good
I am studying in allen
In 11th I pressume
I am in 12th, i keep shifting between Bitsat and jee advanced
I have been practicing a lot for that
I feel i can crack jee but i am not utilising my potential
So practice, not under time pressure at first
later under time pressure
I have to prove something, will just prove that, and be back
Ugh i need to get better at finishing exams fast
BSc is a bit complicated than jee maths imo
Ayo what?
no idea
I gave this years advance
Which is why I can say BSc level math is a bit complicated
it's not
that's kinda obvious no
less questions= more time to each
Yea
That is very much a misconception here
Normally less questions = more time yes, but jee advanced questions are never meant to be solved in a specific time
Chemistry is acceptable (30-45 minutes) but if the paper is very lengthy like 2022, your doomed.
Physics is again moderate (1 hour)
Maths is where most ppl fuck up tbh. It is very tough, and almost all questions need atleast 4 minutes (certain exceptions are there)
Time management is very essential for this, since losing time in one subject means you have to compromise in another
Which is of no point unless you getthe exact idea
Many questions are very specific in the concepts they use, even if its taken from multiple topics
I know
<@&268886789983436800>
I apologize for bothering the chat again but could anyone who completed a bachelors in pure math at an american university weigh in on how this curriculum, specifically following the 0.2 Field of study, compares to the average pure math degree from an american univerisity https://en.math.uoa.gr/fileadmin/depts/math.uoa.gr/uploads/Archeia_Proptychiakoy_Programmatos/Course_List_2019-20.pdf
Don't post the same message to every channel
Yes lord discord mod Sir!
that person is not a mod
and considering that you apparently did post the same msg to every channel
<@&268886789983436800>
Please be understanding of those who are new to the server.
Ppl getting so pissed for what
Makes them feel powerful for half a second on discord
let's not snipe back and forth either.
I respectfully asked you to not post the same question to 5 different channels - it's against the rules, and it's annoying as heck. If you're new here the least you could do is look into the rules and not get all defensive when people try to remind you of them
😹 👍🏿
👑
@stable valve the rules are the rules for a reason. And other users are trying to help you. Please be respectful. While it's not a big deal that you posted a question in multiple locations if you didn't know any better. I would ask that you keep your questions to a single channel in the future.
👍🏿
Blowing them off with laughing emojis isn't a good way to win friends and influence people who you are asking for help
I understood the first time
I don’t know what else you want me to say
I explain that I posted it in 2 channels and was redirected here
Do I beg to their ancestors for to graciously accept my apology
yes, I understand that. Just no reason to engage with people prodding.
@olive geode please don't prod.
I’m not engaging
If they choose to get mad over 😹 👍🏿
Their problem
I won’t do it again
Don’t know why it’s been half an hour and anyone is still on this
Yeah sorry, I just got a bit pissed by the response, but I'm over it now 👍
@stable valve to answer your direct question though, I'll have to pose another question, do the numbers in the document correspond to course numbers that are similar in form to US course numbers, where the first digit corresponds to the year that the material will be taken?
So 400 level courses are for seniors?
300 are for juniors, etc?
So 800 for 2nd semester seniors, 700 for 1st semester, etc?
Ect
Oh
I thought it was the physics one
It seems so but I can probably place out by the time I go
I don’t know how much they are willing to place me out
I will have calc 1/2/3 along with ODE PDE Lin Alg Point Set Topology and diff geo
Possibly an algebra class
I’m just asking if overall the content covered is more or less the same
- anal 1/2
So if what I said above is true, this is somewhat more advanced than a standard pure mathematics course curriculum in the united states at a "normal" (not pure math focused) college. I selected my alma mater for the comparison, which is Georgia Tech, an engineering college.
It's not a super highly ranked college in mathematics.
That’s what I thought
My other options are stony brook or city college
It does appear to me to be more advanced
anyway, I need to get back to work. 👋
Thank you
SPIKE!
How would you prepare yourself for an exam at the level of JEE, if you were starting from scratch?
I'm actually prepping for MEXT but if I prepare for something harder then I'll undoubtedly pass
I think
Talking strictly about mains:
Well the portion for jee is large, so you'll need to set a structured course, especially if you have no one to teach you in that order. For Chemistry there's a book called NCERT in ind, that's what most Jee mains questions are from, see if you can get that wherever you are. For math you're just gonna need to develop speed, I don't really think it matters where you study it from, and prioritise getting faster each time you solve a specific thing. Physics hm, there's two books by HC Varma, or you can get DC Pandey (i prefer HC Verma cause it's more in-depth). Also, find some way to get pyqs, and solve them after you're done with each chapter- either a pdf from somewhere or a site like room.examgoal.com(tbf, this is paid, and idk if its available outside ind, but its extremely cheap). You should solve topicwise/chapterwise part tests about once or twice a month of everything you've done until then. I'd say for actually starting to grind full pyq papers you should start about 3-4 months before whatever exam you're giving. And always try to first understand the concept and solve the problems without a time limit, and then move on to solving questions by timing yourself. There's a lot of other stuff you could think about, but ig this is sufficient.
Of course, all this is kinda like the dream, most important of all is that you need consistency, even if your studying hours per day drop, you shouldn't stop and do a little bit everyday cause once you stop you'll just get into a rut.
Compared to JEE those questions aren't hard tho 

What are these
Question from the mext scholarship exam
U have to fill in the blanks the answer
Ic
Btw set a clear goal either prepare solely for mext or do jee and study those topics which are in mext but not in jee
Don't keep switching targets
Same stuff, different levels ig then
Calc 2?💀
Idk what mext is so cant comment on that
Do kiddos there finish high school at 30 yo?
Yeah we complete i think half calc 2
Calc 2 for undergrad applications or for grad only? 💀
Calc 2 is not actually full nm
I think like
Half
Dont sweat it tho its easy if taught by the right people
I swear this is common in most places, isn’t calc 2 just like integration and extremely ODEs
Most of what I've seen is derivatives and integration
yeah that's basically all there is to calc2
Is it
What abt the polar coordinates stuff and taylor series
Isnt that calc 2 as well
Wherever i go to look it up people give different answers 
i can't speak from personal experience bc my school was on the quarter system but i think the topics covered in https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/ are typical
Welcome to my math notes site. Contained in this site are the notes (free and downloadable) that I use to teach Algebra, Calculus (I, II and III) as well as Differential Equations at Lamar University. The notes contain the usual topics that are taught in those courses as well as a few extra topics that I decided to include just because I wante...
O nice
Yes
That isn't much material though
Is it possible to study the exam I am curious

heyyyyyyy
mann i am pleading , like can anyone have me to understand integrals and derivatives with just the bases of them and also how to make use of them. We are required to use that presently in physics but knowing how vast a topic it is i often times need confrontation on doubts i have like , "yeah you'd study up that later "or ," theres a reasoning behind it too" , and "thats wut it does"
Have you checked out this https://www.khanacademy.org/math/calculus-1
what do I do when I lose motivation
like RA is becoming so hard for me I'm starting to regret chosing maths
Discipline. Pushing through with or without motivation; whether you like it or not.
Of course I am not saying that you have to keep pushing through math even if you have other viable options such as changing streams that could be more beneficial to you in the long run. That's up to you to properly reflect upon and decide.
So uhm, where do y'all get your problems to solve? I have to study a lot of mathematics to get into uni and need practice. I currently use chatgpt, is that fine?
no
Ok so where do I find them?
Why has it become more difficult
perhaps addressing the core issue directly might help you get better at real analysis and eventually become an analysis god 
But yes ^ don't rely on motivation, develop discipline
Analysis God 
textbooks
This is a pretty common problem, it’s well acknowledged in research and you simply just have to push through. Real analysis is typically the first major hurdle people encounter and learning to deal with that is an important skill to learn
You’ll also find the rest of maths “easier” because you will be more comfortable with 1) what proof based mathematics looks like 2) being stuck and lost and powering through anyway
In my personal experience, no particular field of math has been a hurdle, everything I've learned/am learning, real analysis, group theory, linear algebra have been equally challenging and fun
The major and only hurdle I ever encounter is myself 
thank you
I mean you’re an adult so
please don't post unsolicited forms in this server
Zan (鹿乃 #1 Fan)
(unsolicited form)
A good way for reading books I have found is to read the books instead of being on discord all day long 
Fr
Gal
Hello everyone i need some help.
am a grade 8 that can do grade 3 math, I have dyscalculia and dyslexia so it makes math quite difficult, I need continuous help in math as I try to understand, I don’t understand anything further than average addition and subtraction, it’s quite embarrassing.
that’s not embarrassing at all, everyone has their own level they work at and their own pace that they improve at, always feel free to ask for help in the server 
That reaction emoji, is that from a Detroit Become Human server?
Connor and Hank hugging?
YES
OMGOHS
YOU KNOW THEM TOO
DBSKKDBSKSKDI
sorry- I don’t find many fans out in the wild
It’s actually from Bryan decharts official server! (He’s the one that acted Connor)
Oh nice
Detroit Become Human is so peak 🗣️
ye I know Dechart acted as Connor that's why I asked since the name of the emoji was "Dechart Hug"
Hehehe
But anyway yes I think you will find this server quite helpful
I hope so
Nothing has been able to help me
especially this
I can’t use that bc I don’t have a specific question
No, I mean
When you are learning math and face issues due to dyscalculia and dyslexia
"Trash" 💀
💔
We are never instructed problem solving and neither I'm good at it. Following OSSU curriculum of CS and mathematics courses come with word problems. Can't help myself with those and see the solutions is only I can do. Ain't confident enough. Any advice from where to start and whether should I still continue the course provided no problem solving background?
Show an example of the types of word problems you are stuck on
May be basic but as I mentioned we ain't taught here. I don't know if regional background must be taken into account but it's a fact, even a CS graduate as I asked some failed to understand this.
I think the correct answer is "eieieo!"
I may complete the course like traditionally we do here. Just see the solution and try to understand it.
a question for you all: when you're writing a test, do you completely solve a problem before moving on to another one, or do you have a different method?
my method as of rn is to pick a problem, solve as much of it or make as much progress as I can on it until I get stuck for over 2 to 3 minutes, then select another one and repeat
and do this until most to every problem is partially solved
and then come back to finish off whatever I can
I think it helps me pick up partial marks a lot, but I also think it throws me off balance
as in, I have too many problems on my mind to think of at once, and also makes it hard for me to keep track of where I was on each problem
does anybody else do this? if so, any advice?
if not, what methods do you employ for test-taking, and what makes them work for you?
i am a big fan of starting from the back and then making my way to the beginning (if it’s meant to get harder from start to end), it’s something my chemistry teacher told me to do in high school and i’ve been doing it since
it means the test gets progressively easier and even though the beginning is tough, it means you’re not scrambling for marks on difficult questions when your time is nearly up
the problems on the tests I write have, in my experience, not been in any order of difficulty 
oh really?? every one i’ve done so far has been structured like that
well i guess even then just start with the ones that look the most difficult, and then move on to the easier ones
sure, but I almost never solve them in a timely manner
so I move onto other problems, but then I have all the issues I mentioned earlier
ahh right yah i see the problem
mine r usually strucuted in order of difficulty somehwat
but
earlier questions do catch me out more than the harder ones sometimes
never ask me "why the model wont work" for 1mark, i wont get the mark 😂😂😂
I do basically exactly what you described but after I've seen every problem I don't keep cycling through. Once I've seen them all I tend to put my focus on the one that seems most easy to crack.
From there I just kind of alot time based on whether or not I feel like I'm going to make progress.
If I get stuck too long I'll poke at whatever seems next easiest and so on.
If they all seem hard I'll just cycle through them cyclically I guess.
It's kind of a shitshow no matter what you do on hard tests.
I'll try this next time
I think one thing I try to avoid is getting caught in that trap where you're just staring at the paper scratching your head.
It still happens but I'm always looking for something to tangibly try or to calculate.
thanks Doot c:
Bro? Re:Zero enjoyer in the math server?! Based 
If we get partial points I do this, if we don't get partial points(which is literally half of the time lmao) I try to finish all the exercises I know as carefully as possible and then for the other exercises I just write as many things as I can :|
🙏🙏🙏
oh i js realsied u know icarus too
Yoooo
Okay let me see
yoooo
Re:Zero gang represent!
real
does this look nice a time time table for next sem ( courses I'm planning to take)
like am I taking on too much
you need at least twice as many courses (maybe even thrice)
my credit limit is 25, this is 23 credits
you're /j or /srs
bro the fuck u learning on friday
😂😂😂😂
and monday
Are you talking about RA1? I would assume it stands for Real Analysis 1
no bro
the
folk music in india/ climate change/ game theory
😭😭😭
what an absolute lineup of classes

add your tutoring hours
I didn't even notice 
That's a 1.5 credit course
still that's quite a title
it's 3 courses kek
no clue what a credit is
Oh I see okay
those are 3 options lol
I'm not sure which one I'll get
Offered by a sociology prof
how do you get rid of study role 😭
go to id:customize and unselect the role

this one in particular
or do ,iamnot studying!
it won't work in onboarding if you did it through ,iam
unless you select it and then deselect it
thank you thank you THANK YOU!!!!!
You'll be cursing them soon after being fed up with the discussy brainrot 
Btw, welcome to the server! 
Seems good to me. I'd replace differential geometry with algebraic geometry and maybe macroecon with ring theory idk
i don't think algebra 1 means what you think it does..
Can someone give me a youtube playlist that covers all of factoring please
I am planning to replace macroeconomics with operator theory
If I'm able to get the time table fixed
based
Yeah engineers know wtf is a pro-Galois group
Egg in ear
If I can get some time table issues sorted out
I hope you realise this is for a 2nd year math major
You can't take ring theory as a 2nd year?
that's in my 4th semester
this is my 3rd
~~ terrible if you are not doing topos theory on 1st year of undergrad you're cooked~~
I'm planning to do a PhD course in year 3 
just that I don't have the pre-reqs rn
i took your mom in my first year
oh this is study-discussion
but honestly i dont think its constructive to be like "I did X when I was only Y years old", it just makes things seem unnecessarily competitive. And no one's in a rush here either
(I took a PhD course when I was 2 years old)
Oh sorry I didn't mean it this way
I was just curious about how is it like in other institutions
Some do let you take courses even if you don't have prereqs
I finished my PhD when I was 1 btw (using Arch)
I think it varies from "There are no electives, you're gonna shut up and take the courses we tell you to take" to "Do whatever you want, take whatever courses you want"
SAILOR MOON LOOKS DIFFERENT http://bit.ly/HY7MB2
LIKE us on: http://www.facebook.com/collegehumor
The news every father dreads hearing... without his friends around to also hear it.
See more http://www.collegehumor.com
FOLLOW us on: http://www.twitter.com/collegehumor
FOLLOW us on: http://www.collegehumor.tumblr.com
what
I have to respond with something just as outrageous
I'm just so tired of home 😔
NEED UNIVERSITY
but at the same time I feel this atutude will lead to burn out
What's the motivation for replacing diff geo with alg geo without further knowing what the person wants to study?
(Maybe they mentioned it before, idk)
Deltoid hates diff geo and wants to make sure diff geo never sees the light of day
Replacing macroeconomics with ring theory indicates that it's just a shitpost lol
Not sure if they mentioned it before
I feel like you'd benefit more from AG. That was the case in my experience
Burnout sucks
I wouldn't say easier. It's more enjoyable
The content gets harder, but you get better at learning - like how to spend your time reading, taking notes, doing exercises - plus you have more experience to draw on, so it's easier to put what you learn in context
Wouldn't that be heavily dependent on what the person wants to do?
Sure
I'm just biased towards AG
😂
Even with stuff like lie theory
Im currently going through Hartshorne myself actually
On Sheaf Cohomology
Yeah it's really fun
Also it's finally super elegant to prove De Rhams theorem with sheaf cohomology
I do agree that learning it algebraically is super nice, but a lot of my working intuition for this algebraic stuff works so well because I learned smooth manifolds before hand
I eventually want to get to moduli space stuff tho
Hmm, maybe you'll be more productive, but if so the workload increases proportionally, because I think very few people spend less time studying as they progress. But it's hard to define workload objectively, so I don't think I have a definite answer
What if you could be biased towards both AG and DG
I wish
AG has so many good stuff it makes it hard
Deltoid is not a hater of DG lol
I AM the hater of DG
What did DG do to you
Drainnnnn ganggggg
?
I don't even think AG is being offerd RN
I don't have the pre-reqs and there's no demand rn, though I could get it offerd soon
Fractal geometry sounds fun lol
Yes study fractal geo 
Let's see, been 5 years since it was offered
last offered
I can get it offered IMO
honestly, should I take diff geo or operator theory
LA2 is an option too
just so confused
How would you do either of those without linalg2?
idk, it will either be made simpler or they'll teach whatever's required
like we've done linear maps, inner product spaces, eigenspaces and the spectral theorm ( this without proof) in LA1 amongst other things
shoulnd't that be enough
honestly it might be
My linear algebra class didnt even talk about spectral theorms i had to learn that shi in functional analysis
In that case what do you suggest I take
both sound fun
just so confused
Any of the two is good i dont think it matters
i encourage breadth in undergrad
U can try diff geo maybe and see how geometry feels
Operator theory is more analysis + linear algebra
hmm
hey guys
hi
would doing both be taking too much upon myself
I also do RA1 next sem
also what is this channel 😭
I never seen this shi till today
Worst mod award goes to
@mooderators
Happy birthday
do you know of politico?
Ty
Maybe. is it the thread in somewhere i forgot where
For political discussion or sth
i never go in there
Practice
Your professor may have taught that course/topics in the field many times to get comfortable with the types of questions in it, which in turn was practice for them
Diff geo
Damn
Any ISI student (Indian Statistical Institute) here🤞
i need guide and help
pls contact me if possible
Pleased to connect
which one do you want? i have both written in latex(latex is tiring btw) and handwritten on ipad 
some samples
hand drawn diagrams in LaTeX, absolutely based
instead of trying to TikZ everything @eager halo
yeah tikz is annoying lol
too much work
way too much work and way too little gains
TikZ: annoying and unatural
hand drawn: beautiful and has a certain vibe to it
Do you have a drawing tablet?
yes i got an ipad for a reason
Oh you have an ipad okay

OK. So, you can use Khan Academy and start where you're at. Just grind, do a lot of practice problems (like on AoPS's alcumus), and if you have any specific math questions, you can open a help channel.
Tried lmoa
My brain just shuts down
Prob since I moved to homeschool
Well, in what way?
I'm homeschooled too
and I have no idea why you're experiencing this
I've started homeschool since 6th, whenever I didnt understand smth in public, I would've needed a teacher to explain it to me so I would understand logically
mhm, ok. So, if you don't understand a specific thing, you can open a help channel here.
There will be people who are very happy to help.
I've met a person here my age who's helping me rn, but she has a different time zone
Whenever you have specific questions, you can ask on here. Many people are online, especially during this time.
Must be embarrassing to say, but I finnaly understood rearanging formula last week
Being in 11th 😭
That is OK, if you work hard, you'll be able to do it.
Again, you just need to grind, and by that, I mean a lot.
Idk even know what im supposedly to learn to get back
You said you tried Khan academy. They have a curriculum there, no?
They dont have a testing area to check your knowledge to set
do you do gcse or wht?
What is gcse
ok nvm sry
By what you're saying, I think you should start by looking at the 6th grade section. (no offense btw)
💀
you can see what you know and don't know; if there are too many things you don't understand, you can go back one grade; if you understand everything, you can go up one grade.
and just grind from there
I'm sorry, but this is really the only way.
Bro I finished undergrad and I still don't understand it
I think it's just cuz you never heard of it mentioned this way
I think you understand
Anyway, does that make sense?
But im going to public in 2 months
tbh yea I don't know what the "rearranging formula" is
iirc it's just adding the same thing to both sides / multiplying the same thing to both sides
Ik what you mean and im not trying to be rude, but I need someone who can help me along the way, like I said it isnt a small thing im asking
Oh yea that's trivial
shame on you for not understanding
There are many people who can help you here
jk
and they'd be glad to help you Wonder, because they simply like math and helping other people
You can open a help channel like you just did if you don't understand a concept
And good luck!
😭
I'm sorry, but again, that's the only thing you can do. I wish it wasn't.
So there isnt a person here, who can guide/teach me along the way, "no offence btw appreciate all of yall advices"
There are many!
However, most of us probably can't teach every concept to you (because honestly, we aren't professional teachers)
But if you have any questions you are more than welcome to open a help channel or DM me.
Ty, for that appreciate all the help I can get
Yeah no
I'm pretty sure that mixing hand drawn diagrams in TeX is considered bad typography
hand drawn is fine if you are actually good at art, otherwise learn to tikzpicture and quit bitching
Or inkscape
I’m in the process of painfully learning tikzpicture since I’m writing notes for my calc 3 class
Pain
tikz is good for the soul
I’m eating my veggies
how do you format it
and your hand writing is super neat
Yeah well-drawn inkscape looks as good as TikZ, at least to my layman eyes.
format what? in latex it should fine but for handwritten takes a little bit time but it could be also easy
thanks
How do u do latex
np
pinned messages in #latex-help
you can get started with these resources
Nvm it’s alright I’ll stick to iPad notes but like i don’t have any structure
there are good apps i wanted to try but most of them are paid
so far i use freenotes and note+
those might be great ones imo
have u tried Microsoft one note
yes but personally I dont like it 
why not
because i hate microsoft
why do u hate Microsoft
its shit and always have problems if it makes sense im a linux user 
but i wouldn't say onenote is too bad its up to you
seems fine
what is Linux
fair point
google exists
you are google
linux is just an os
if it helps you then sure 
hello eveyrone
i graduated highschool in june 2022 only VERY recently have i decided to go back to school im attending the university of washington now but between those years ive obviously have not done any math
i was just wondering if doing algebra 1 geometry algebra 2 trigonometry precalculus ap calculus ab & bc multivariable calculus and differential e quations and liner algebra is good enough
to get prepared
literally starting from level 1
so basically
doing everything from that screenshot but skipping integrated math series statistics college algebra
the three at the bottom aren't well handled by khan academy
Khan Academy's Multivariable Calculus course is GOATED 🔥
Most of the videos (and articles too I think?) are done by Grant Sanderson (3Blue1Brown guy), they're super useful
is khan academy really that good? for following the path of learning math without skipping smth etc
khan is quite bad imo
pick up an analysis textbook
a what
What math are you studying?
For high school level math it's fine iirc
yes yes high school level
Then yeah you should be fine
“proving inequalities” rn
Though I think it's a bit lacking in later highschool material
Could be wrong though
idk i just made an account 2 days ago
You won't lose anything from doing it, you'll definitely gain a bunch
But I don't know if it can replace a full highschool curriculum
also need to work on my factorising
For that it should be fine
murica is really advanced
idk i live somewhere else
Same
how do you guys stay motivated? i found this video already https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZhoeSaPF-k
Get 2 Months Free On Skillshare: https://skl.sh/improvementpill5
Join The Mailing List For The Habit Builder Challenge:
http://improvementpill.net/programs
A lot of people ask me questions about how to stay/be/get motivated. Today I'll tell you about a very interesting study on motivation that will you you a lot of insight on what you actually ...
i think that i do best when people validate my efforts / reward me anyone else studying maybe we can encourage each other
also found this video, seems like this is a really effective way to study https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WHbaEQZ6pU
My example deck
Research
- Summary of research on spaced repetition: https://www.gwern.net/Spaced-repetition
Others methods
- Using Anki for Mathematics: https://www.lukethorburn.com/anki/
- How to use Anki for Mathematics and Physics: https://unhewn-thoughts.org/anki/ankimaphycs
- Thoughts by a co...
I used it for intro to abstract algebra. Pretty good, but it takes a lot of overhead to do good slides.
it'd be kind of neat if a teacher added to a deck as students learned and then had the students take turns answering the slides so that they socially could see how others answer questions and learn together
is this not js class
mb if that was rude, it js sounds like regular teaching
Take a break and reevaluate your life circumstances.
You will not be productive if you are in a bad mental state.
@tacit sapphire
very true, I actually made very awful life choice for being addicted to math.. and whenever I look at my current grade sheets I just want to curse
And it actually is harder than I expected in many ways😢
Though I am thinking of studyint quantitive finance or something to utilize my learned skill if I can’t manage to study math however I don’t think if they actually need such knowledge I learned… almost completely out of real life applications
Guys can i ask a question? why AM-GM so hard?
Idk, why is it hard for you?
You're addicted to math , i badly want that
boy if you think thats hard
also wait are you talking about inequality or just arithmetic mean and geometric mean
is there a way you folks orient yourself to be able to sit down to do math? I know this sounds like a very odd question but I basically do this as a hobby and sometimes I become a bit too complacent to be able to follow up to whatsoever progress that I have made
In essence, I am struggling with commitment and consistency and was wondering if there are any ways to mitigate the issue
I have a part time job which isn't too intense, so idk if I could shift the blame to any form of excuses like exhaustion or being overwhelmed by work
in any case, I'd love to hear yall's inputs
I kinda just forced myself to sit down
That was a joke
But
I kinda just
Shift my minsset
Especially on some annoying and hard topics
I usually focus on something cool
Whether it be trivial like integrals
Or advanced as manifolds and general topological shapes
mathematics comes across rarely as "cool" to me 
to me it's just definitions, theorems/lemmas, proofs and exercises
Well, are you really learning math correctly?
What math do you study
rn I am trying to do Number Theory and Real Analysis
Hm
Real analysis is like
Studying calc stuff
In an analytical way
Yeah it's a more proof oriented course
But if you look at what those definitions and theorems are saying, it's so PEAK though 🗣️🔥🔥🔥
and quite beautiful
Yes 
Finance is such a joke of a field, holy shift
Especially the beginner stuff. Trying to calculate some WACC nonsense that is literally wack and I am 99% sure there is some circular reasoning going on here
Maybe it is just gpt (o3 latest model) screwing up, but at least it managed to be somewhat precise. The school book's 600 pages is basically just a handwaving marathon
Try doing cfa
Is that to say CFA is better or worse?
I'm starting to read through an Intro to Stats and Probability textbook. I want to review some concepts and learn others. I will work on some problems from each chapter. Should I focus on the odd numbered ones so I can check my answers in the back? Maybe complete the even numbered ones for extra practice?
Should I take detailed notes on each chapter? What about the definitions and terms explained in each chapter?
The thing is to sit down and crunch through at least some problems daily in your free time, whether you feel the motivation or not. You may take a few days rest if you are not feeling productive at all while doing math. I personally take at least one rest day per week.
One can memorize/prove the definitions/theorems, but how to apply them and reason comes from problem crunching. Do at least one problem a day, or you may even extend the duration of solving that problem to many days till you understand the underlying concept(s) in your free time. You're doing math as a hobby, so don't take much pressure.
As for progress, select some small questions that serve as a revision of the previous topic(s) whenever you get back doing math, and gloss through them if you want. But solve, that is very important. And go through a variety of questions, not just crunch on the same type. It's training one's mind to think about a problem in multiple ways and finding the best/reasonable solution, in my opinion.
And, if this helps, form a small habit of appreciating the upsides/advantages of the theorem(s) you have learned about. This in turn may help you to get an idea where the theorem(s) can be applicable.
As a general caveat, everyone learns differently and learns at different paces. Part of developing as a student/researcher in any field is to find what works best for you.
With that out of the way, i would suggest that (depending on the amount of time/patience you have) you try to work through as many problems as you can after reading a chapter. This is really the single best way to learn and gain intuition for what you are reading. If you only really have time to do half of the problems then sticking with the odd problems in the beginning may be useful insofar as to make sure you are understanding the core concepts. As you progress, you should be able to pick out problems that you feel will help you the most.
If there are things you are reviewing, simply rereading the material is often sufficient. For new material, I would suggest writing down the big theorems/lemmas and then adding your own personal notes on specific points which give you the most trouble. Ideally you will revisit these notes. Writing down definitions is often tedious, but may again be helpful in the beginning to get used to the material/concepts. Lastly, consider what you want to get out of the book. Textbooks are hundreds of pages long and unless you have hours and hours of time to study the material, you really should skim the next chapter’s material to see if it is worth pursuing. That said, if you are new to probability/statistics you may not know what to exclude. In that case, you should consult a syllabus or ask someone before you just skip a chapter. Best of luck!
Thank you!!!
im talking about AM-GM that usually show up in math competition
Same
🫂
Yes I understand
It makes up a lot of questions in imo
They pull out some bs inequality
My approach has been to first try to understand why I want to be better at math and why it feels important to me. Then I try to create a routine for it. I try to also pay attention to what distracts me and is of less importance and also try to figure out how I can remain focused. So far having a screen time limit on my phone has helped with a lot of the distractions and physical exercise helps a lot with focus
It is a struggle tho and i do have setbacks from time to time, but having a very concrete routine on things is of great help for me
often times people being bad at math is because they are trying to learn higher level stuff without having fully mastered the basics. If you try to learn odes without having a good understanding of derivatives and integrals first then it is going to be harder and a whole lot less fun
And sometimes people are bad at math because they spend more time asking for book recommendations than actually reading the books 
It does take courage to slow things down and go at your own pace, but if you rush things then you will end up just memorizing the method and that knowledge wont stick around with you for much longer than 6 months (at least in my experience that is). The ideal thing would be to find some problem you want to solve and see if you can break it down into smaller problems and you dont move on to the next problem before you have fully understood the solution of the current one
It does take courage to slow things down and go at your own pace
This must mean I have the most courage in the world
not me taking 2+ years to learn basic analysis 
but i do get that academia often doesn't allow you to spend this much time on one single problem
that is often the case for me
You can ask for hints if you are spending too much time on a single problem
yeah you can, but i really dislike asking for help. That's my issue
I prefer to figure out what kind of problem it is, check if it is a well researched one and see if there are solutions out there of similar problems that I can use as hints
what kind of analysis you learning btw?
#1059828221887135774 introductory real analysis
looks like measure theory to me
Lol there was just a conversation about the Lebesgue integral, I myself haven't yet started MT
insert catking
I see, that's explain everything
Thank you
Thank You @glacial raven @main lodge for the suggestions. I appreciate it ❤️
I actually went out of my way and rented out a Library space where they allot you a cabin where you can work.
It has helped tremendously, I must say!
Can I join you in that space 
I have a question regarding those who are studying math in university. What math should i study to make myself ready?
I've already studied linear Alagebra and multivariable calculus.
should i study anything more?
Those are typically subjects you're supposed to learn at university ...
"Proofs" is what all of mathematics is about.
what about having fun 🥺
That's an excellent idea. Pick some math you have fun with, and play around with that.
if you have alr done a course in LA
its prob the best place to learn proofs imo
loook [here](#book-recommendations message) for some books on a second course
The hardest thing about shaking off my math rust (for context, I'm going back to school after dropping out for 3+ years) is that I have a natural tendency to speed through everything. Feeling like I need to play catch-up isn't helping either
i'm in a similar position, i'm starting with the aops prealgebra book
it's nice cause the challenge problems are hard
i'm using anki to schedule reviewing the problems. so far it's effective but i've only gotten the problems from the first section in anki so far
Hi everyone! 👋
I’m interested in learning some essential math concepts that are useful for executive-level decision-making, especially in fields like finance, strategy, and analysis.
Here’s a list of what I want to learn:
• Ratios and Proportions
• Percentages
• Basic Algebra
• Fractions and Decimals
• Mean, Median, Mode
• Standard Deviation
• Variance Analysis
• Probability
• Time Value of Money
• Simple and Compound Interest
• Rate of Return
• Discounting
• Net Present Value (NPV)
• Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
• Sensitivity Analysis
• Scenario Analysis
• Linear Programming
• Mathematical Modeling
• Area, Volume, Graph Interpretation
If anyone is teaching this or has resources, please let me know! I’d love to join a study group or get some guidance. 😊
I’m 14.8 years old girl and I want to learn thus Because I want to become an executive leader at Aramco. , im new
My advice is to just cut down the number of subjects you want to learn into something that you can actually juggle in the short term, in the meantime, as for resources, Khan Academy (to my knowledge) covers almost every single one of these, anything you can't look for there, Google is your friend
Heyy, should I learn how to use theorems in statistics or should I also learn how to rigorously proof them?
I'm so close to completing all of High School Geometry on Khan Academy.
After this, it's time to learn Algebra 2 again.
nice
Does anyone else get surprised when they finally learn something they never thought they could do before?
Thank you!
me 
Is anyone studying stats, probability, or calc just for fun? 🙂
Hi
I barely started with stats cause I might need it to my degree just in case don't wanna get cooked 
as for calc, which one are you referring to?
hey guys, are there any recommendations for someone in middle school who wants to get into college with like a math major? i literally don't know anything about college and stuff but I wanna start off early.
maybe you can start with calculus or linear algebra
alright! im not sure if its a start but I've been practicing matrices
I am cooked, the uni i wanna apply for master requires basic knowledge in probability. I have to revisit it ahhh
idk what exactly you are practicing in matrices.
But in order to have a clear path it is recommended to have a textbook
gulp... do you have any textbook recommendations? im going into 8th grade in August btw if that helps. I'm practicing multiplication of two matrices
since i have never studied any calculus book properly so i cannot recommend any
\
oh, sorry i thought you were talking about university
real
OH
mb 
its alright
well, i guess using math textbook for next class (grade) would work
idk if there are fixed books
no clue 😵💫
in our country, from grade 1 -- 12 the books are fixed. So everything comes from there, exams lectures etc
Is it better to train one self to write slicker proof when it does not obscure the main logic?
How to write proofs that are self contained? Like if I study algebra then I can write proofs using algebraic method instead of other not that painfully?
I would suggest you give an example to illustrate this, if you can...
Sure
Here are two examples, one is similar ball arguments, one proof I did with every detail spelled out another I just did symbolic manipulation though I don’t find black box but it’s harder to decode? I don’t know the math departments’ standard
Another is on page 3
One question I proved it twice, one with formal induction long and hard to write (you need to type) but details are spelled out, the alternative proof is one liners
The way to achieve the slickness is always through symbolic manipulation than explaining because if you explain you have to illustrate the inequality with more inequality despite its basic fact and more words too
[so, just to point out - there are proofs for three separate things here]
Yes but barely I’ll do twice. For the first proof I can actually make it more slick but I felt since it is my note I need it comprehensive
[But assuming your question is whether to use different algebraic approaches to simplify the logic]
That should be fine, as long as the logic remains sound
I think I would need to see an example of what your slick version is to make a judgement call on it
By "formal induction" I assume you're referring to this section specifically?:
Another problem is some argument despite used as facts are hard to prove, sometimes I had to appeal to another branch of mathematics
Yes that’s a lot more wording
I kinda want my note to be self contained however this little lemma turns out way harder
So they've written everything out to be very explicit; it's already self-contained to a point
The alternative proof is an example
But essentially this boils down to "do you understand how to write an inductive proof?"
Oh, as in avoid induction altogether?
But the proof I wrote is exactly how the induction is done in basic analysis book define property basic case and hypothesis then implication
In this case, yes you can, since you're actually using induction implicitly
Because the logic is sound for any given n, it will also work if I add another U in there
So the alternative is still induction?
It's implicit, you wouldn't even have to state that that's what you're doing
Is the alternative proof for the third claim an actual example? Because I think iam quite in short of that logic
Admittedly, that's me claiming that this is still induction; others may argue otherwise
This, right?
Yes
This is less about logic per se, and more about exploiting a definition
It's mentioned as much: "Then by definition of the open sets, for any arbitrary..."
If you want I can give a brief explanation of what that proof is actually doing
Is the second proof in this case considered better for math department or the fully spelled out induction?
"better"?
If I were to write either of them I'd get full marks
It's worth trying to make sure you at least understand both
Because for every open set x in B we have epsilon > 0 such that B(x,epsilon) contained in B so if I take the minimal epsilon then immediately it contained in the intersection
I'll briefly explain this one so it's a little clearer what's actually going on
Since it’s finite so it’s minimum no need to consider the infimum so the property of closed under intersection holds is the base logic
I think for the proof
The induction is essentially the same though
Only details spelled out?
Take a point x in the intersection of these U-open-sets
As each U is open, I can draw a ball around x, say with radius epsilon_i that fits inside each U_i
Let's make a list of these epsilons
Now consider what would happen if I take the smallest epsilon_i (call this just epsilon) [this certainly exists if n is finite]
Then B(x,epsilon) is certainly inside B(x,epsilon_i) which is inside U_i, no matter what i I use
So in fact B(x,epsilon) is in all the U_i's
i.e. this ball is an open ball inside the intersection of the U_i's
i.e. we've just drawn an open ball in the intersection - so we've proven the intersection itself is an open set
The induction proof is a sure-fire way to approach this question if you don't come up with the above; the mechanism behind induction gives you the groundwork/requirements you need to formulate a proof
Yes! That’s my logic I think. Only it won’t hold if it’s not finitely many open sets, Becasue if we take infimum over epsilon it might as well reach 0
But this proof also exists
Correct; if n is infinite you might need a greater condition
I must say you’re right it’s actually very nice to draw I learned it from someone from this server
It helped me a lot with understanding this
Another issue I face currently is
And in fact, it is not generally true, if n is infinite - as a counterexample, consider the sets U_i = (-1/i , 1/i )
Each U is open; yet the infinite intersection is {0}, which is non-open
Many basic facts used in my current subject, aren’t easy to prove this turned out to be very hard
In particular this
This seems to be very easy and elementary fact but it is completely different thing.. I tried many times I couldn’t prove it
At all
I know fubini tonelli but it’s not self contained anymore it’s my note for abstract algebra
I tried using basic argument and I just can’t prove it
And this tonelli fubini makes my note completely not self contained
You can look these up
Specifically see if you can keep them in sigma notation rather than integrals, if that makes it easier to grasp
But that’s still measure theoretic
True
But these index sets are finite, so they're Lebesgue integrable; that's all we need
I want an elementary proof, this fubini tonelli proof I wrote it myself I just find it too abrupt to my note
Since it’s quite elementary abstract algebra note and I bring in tonelli
And the elementary proof for the lemma is really hard actually
Ah I see you're arguing that using Tonelli or Fubini is a little overkill
You can argue as much
Specifically the sets I and J are finite; you could just make a counting argument
I just find it weird why those facts used almost routinely so hard to proof
The more elementary something looks, the less clear it is how wild the proof is
Some things fall out as natural consequences
Others you have to go out of your way to demonstrate
It's why things like Fermat's Last Theorem having a proof hundreds of pages long are a thing
True, but it somehow makes me so annoyed especially I thought it would be an easy argument
And I spent an entire afternoon giving up on it and used tonelli
Ah - have a look through
https://web.math.ucsb.edu/~cmart07/fubini.pdf
...It doesn't embed oops - but this is essentially what this is about: the Discrete version (discrete because we're counting discretely (Sigma), not continuously (integral)) of the Fubini Principle
This is the theorem in question
It doesn't list a proof, but you might recognise this as "adding up all the terms in a matrix"
Thanks so much though this lemma actually made me quite sad yesterday for that I couldn’t prove it
I just can’t accept it’s basic and assumed…
This proof in fact, was like a spiral somehow and it became more and more complicated. So but yesterday there was a person who mentioned double induction and I am gonna watch some vid to learn it
Yeah it is just a counting argument
I know I've asked this before, but just want reassurance , is it normal for RA to absolutely destroy one
yea
I've written proofs before
a lot of them ( I used axler for LA1)
I'm particularly having trouble with the huge number of defns I have to work with at once
Well, there's a new source of proof shock in analysis, in that it becomes much more common just to pull estimates out of a hat, with no compelling reasons why those particular estimates.
That could be a sign of having done too few exercises about the early definitions. Or a bad book that doesn't offer those exercises, Iunno.
I'm basically self studying( using my prof's notes from my seniors) and having my friend who has done this course give me problems
Hmm that might be a situation where you face a dearth of simple exercises (perhaps your friend is wary of boring you).
Perhaps, the exercise have mostly been interesting results.
I do have a copy of abbott, but I feel that too is mostly interesting exercises. Would Tao's analysis be a good book to supplement it?
Fubini - Tonelli is waaay overkill for finite sums
Indeed it smells like induction of the size of I
I'm not able to comment on particular books, unfortunately.
I'll ask in #book-recommendations , thanks for the help!
Actually maybe even better and more general, you can prove that the double sum is equal to a single sum over the Cartesian product
How many chapters of Abbott have you gone through?
~3
I've to do cantor's argument
and hiene borell
You'll get there
You've barely just begun
So it's only normal to feel like analysis is destroying you
If you feel like you're not good enough, just do more exercises
use the theorems and lemmas in the book as exercises
Yea, which is why I was thinking I could get a copy of Tao
I do that
Tao? Are you doing every single exercise in Abbott? 
I try to ( If I've done the theory)
Like I have not done cantor's yet
so that leaves a few good problems
Wait Cantor is chapter 1

Don't skip the project sections of Abbott(thr final section of every chapter), they're very good andn instructive and often contain very nice results
I'd recommend Rudin for more problems
My course hasn't started and I've probably done a month's content, I guess I could redo it from scratch
Lilke I've done fields , sequences, and am currently doing toplogy of R
What happened
Nah Rudin's problems are basically like Abbott's
just with more general metric space stuff
Just baby riding and Abbott for real anal
so it seems difficult on the surface
Baby rudin*
should I do this?
Like even after working on a problem for a day, I can't solve it at times
You say you're doing almost every problem in every section you do in Abbott, you seem to beb doingn fine 
and at times I get a problem only after a final nudge
I'm missing something small but important
that's normal especially at the beginning but try taking a break after a few hours, move on to the next problem, or take a walk, then come back to the problem you were working on. You can also re-read the section to get a better idea of what tools/ideas to use to solve the problem at hand
I remember spending several days on a single problem 
This one problem is from a friend 
The walk is the important part here
Give your subconscious mind some time on the problem
True but temporarily moving onto another problem is also helpful
Indeed
Show $\overline{A^C}= (A^{\circ})^C$ was the problem
wai
I'll do that
Its okay to skip/ask for a hint if it's a problem from a friend, especially this early into learningn analysis
it took me around 1 year to finish 3 chapters of Abbott
(mostly due to my own slothfulness
)
I believe this is mostly an exercise in unpacking definitions
It is
which I'm working on
I'll send this in a help channel with my current working?
You can try #real-complex-analysis
capital C for complement 
complement
No, comlement
bar for closure
yea
sotrue
A^C = X \ A
Lma
A^c
Capital C is more common
Be sure to give the textbook's defs of closure and interior
Not that bad imo 
Me during May 2023: by January of 2024 I'll finish chapter 7 of Abbott and start learning measure theory
Me during Jan 2024: Doing chapter 4

Actually tragic
oh, just wanted to share this ( unrelated), I'm doing differential geo next sem
that is this coming sem
Good luck
of curves and surfaces?
yea
Based
The prof taking this studied at ISI, CMI, TIFR.
I'm cooked
Oh you're from India as well
yea
I keep forgetting
Based
Have you learnt multivariable calculus? That's quite important
for diff geo of curves and surfaces
yea, had 2 courses of it
the first course covered sequences and multi var calc upto differentiation
the other course focused on space curves and integration
Oh okay cool
Finished the Geometry section. Now it's time to move onto Algebra 2!
congrats
Just an intro for now. Reviewing a few things before I get into more advanced stuff.
oh i just barely started :D
which book are u using?
I have this book:
https://www.amazon.com/Calculus-Early-Transcendentals-James-Stewart/dp/1305267265
I'm reading and working through an Intro to Probability and Stats book now. Haven't read the Calc book much yet. I want to very soon.
James Stewart's Calculus: Early Transcendentals is widely renowned for its mathematical precision and accuracy, clarity of exposition, and outstanding examples and problem sets. Millions of students worldwide have explored calculus through Stewart's trademark style, while instructors have turned ...
oh nice
I'm reading this book and skipped most of the sections I already know, except for statistics and other topics listed on the last page since they're new to me
this is just an introductory topics from 1st year bme they gave me, which I still don’t know well for upcoming years lmao
i probably wont doing advanced stuff who knows ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Oohh that looks like a good book. Expensive! Do you have a hard copy or pdf?
I do have the pdf yeah and i can dm u if u want
Sure if you want to.
I tried to add you as a friend but I cant. Add me!
I wonder about thinking of mathematics not as beginning or advanced, but more like concrete versus abstract.
You observe a phenomenon called it A
You observe the pattern of A
You make a conjecture about the pattern of A
You conclude by proving or disproving A
Though not necessarily, i think it’s also possible that
You know something called A
You extended A so there exists B
You study the nature of B and then make a conjecture
You conclude by proving or disproving B
Principle of mathematical induction
Is to see the base case
Make hypothesis
And the inductive step implied by hypothesis
However this is deductive reasoning
So Galois purposed the framework of group theory and later mathematician work on it to extend the theory into Galois theory and modern algebra. These are abstraction to abstraction that’s deductive reasoning (I personally think it this way)

can someone pls explain this so i can solve it
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
What should i say
- Every discrete space is a Hausdorff ...
- Every discrete space is the Hausdorff...
this question is kinda related with english, rather than Math 
first (you can remove the a though, like in the image, "every discrete space is Hausdorff", or "every discrete space is a Hausdorff space")
what would "the Hausdorff" mean?
There isn't a unique Hausdorff space
What is written is fine, Hausdorff is an adjective so you can just say the space is Hausdorff
This makes a lot of sense
Noted
Thank you Capybara and Chmonkey 
chbara
Champybara

Thinking about the space


