Channel closed
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 271 of 1
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't really understand this function
Anybody could give me some tips and pointers on what to do?
what’s the problem at hand? 
this is a piecewise defined function
are you being asked to find its value at x = 2, or determine its continuity?
It's says here "Analyze the following functions and find their parameters"
Sorry, English is not my native language -
sorry no other messages had loaded apart from the first
It's fine, don't worry about it
Im quite literally stuck and the first assignment and really confused
not sure what the question is asking exactly
maybe send the image of the original question
someone else will probably be able to figure it out
Oh yeah, but it's in Spanish btw
Wait, gimme a sec
Analyze the graphs of the following functions and indicate their parameters (Parameters: Domain, Range, Roots, y-intercepts, Intervals of Increase and Decrease, Sets of Positivity and Negativity)
I just would like an explanation of How to do it, I really don't get it
ohh
do you know what each parameter means?
Blue dot for transparency
Domain and Range yeah, I don't really get roots tho
roots is basically where the function is 0
i assume you can find the domain and range
Yeah
where is the functions in the graph zero?
@gilded raptor Has your question been resolved?
Oh yeah, btw I just encountered my teacher and he's helping thank y'all sorry for the trouble
Closed by @gilded raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well (0,0) is an obvious one right
how i find the others
@twin kernel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please can someone give me a clue how to start
for the 15(a) use the sin(2x) identity
2sinxcosx
okay, now try factoring it
Take a common factor of 2cosx?
Let it =0 too?
i mean you are solving sin(2x) + 6cos(x) = 0
So 2cosx=0
so ofc it's = 0
And sinx=-3
yes
@glossy spindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
. This solution is rejected though because it is not possible
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Trying to get some late night reps in. Am I working this problem down correctly? I know I have to get this problem down into the quadratic equation. Once I get it there correctly I get the question right 100% of the time. I just struggle to actually get it there
The quadratic formula actually overkills this question.
Since you're solving for y.
From line one, you move everything to the Right Hand Side.
In which you'll obtain $7y^2 = 3 + x - 2x^2$.
Restarter
Then you can divide both sides by 7.
And Square Root both sides.
Rationalise the denominator if required.
Okay, so looking back with your notes.
I messed up when I was moving things over to the right hand side. I ended up with a negative 3 because I put it through the same procedure as the numbers on the left. (“Moving it “unnecessarily )
While I’m right that -7 doesn’t belong with Y. I’ve actually over complicated what I need to do. I divide both sides to get rid of 7 and then
Can you explain why I’m square rooting please?
I’m going to put the things I’m typing in this help channel into my notebook, so I can reread and tell myself why I got this problem wrong. Then tell myself the correct things to do
bcz we r solving for y not y²
Okay now, if this problem were asking for y^2 what would I be doing in that case?
if tht was the case, this could be ur final ans
after dividing both sides by 7
Closed by @fair crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can I have a hitn
Hint 1: ||Recall the definition of delta(S)||
Hint 2: ||Break it into cases||
Hint 3: ||Two of the cases are trivial; there is only one you have to worry about||
I tried hint 1 and hint 3 earlier 😭
What is δ?
Hint 3 relies on Hint 2 so idk what you mean
Diameter?
the supremum of the distances between any two points in that set.
Triangle inequality
That was going to be my Hint 4 
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ are independent, are then $t^{X_1},\ldots,t^{X_n}$ also independent? I know the collection ${f(X_i)}$ for some measurable function $f$ would be independent because these are all $\sigma(X_i)$-measurable, but I'm not sure what the function $f$ is in my question. The context is probability generating functions.
psie
well the function x \mapsto t^x is measurable innit
Yes. So you fix t?
Or do you perhaps mean (t,x) \mapsto t^x?
that's what i understood you to mean
@inland patio Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @inland patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A straight line passes through (8,2) and cuts the positive co-ordinate axes at P and Q. Find the minimum value of |OP| + |0Q| where O is the origin.
wdym positive coordinate axes?
perhaps, look at a line with varying gradient/slope and then see how the intercepts change according to this
positive x and y axis
negative slope then?
yeah
yep
i did
Have you covered differentiation
a lil bit.
Are you allowed to use it for this problem
yes
Cool
okay, now, look at the quantities you are trying to minimize
can you write them in terms of what you know? how do you minimize this?
that’s what I thought
I think you should find like the bare minimum x and y values if you can’t do diff.
the only relation i could get is 8Q+2P=PQ
ok
So OP, OQ and PQ form a rat
rat?
right angle triangle
oh yes
. . .
One sec I need to draw a diagram myself
what was your equation of the line?
I think this is the one?
where p is the x intecept and Q is the y intercept
so 8y + 2x = xy
that’s the equation op is talking about I think
there are multiple lines that you can get with what we have
?
x/P + y/Q = 1
Ok
slope yes, gradient no.
ok
suppose the slope is m, do you remember what the general equation of a line passing through a point is
i do
spit it out
y=mx+c?
through a point
like if we pass through a point (p,q), do you know the equation of the line given that the slope is m
one point form?
yes
yeah
...
but apart from that, it is ok
yep
now, from this information we can find your P and Q in terms of m
why are we doing this? because we are trying to minimize |OP| + |OQ|, so if we have it in terms of one variable, it is easy
wht abt intercept form ,since theyre given
?
right but the problem is that you don't know the intercepts yet
you have expressions for them and a relation for them
wht is the quotient rule for finding the derivative/
you're trying to optimise
minimize |OP| + |OQ|
and since P and Q are positive,
that'll simply beP + Q
wait ok ch3rry what step are you on
lemme try minimizing using calc
and you can then use
8Q+2P=PQ
to express that in terms of P or Q depending on personal preference
okay, i will let you finish helping then since maybe your method will make more sense to her
yes, i got the same
There's another way
?
that's what she used at the start
Oh okay
so, 8/a + 2/b =1 and use titu lemma inequality
we have 8/a + 2/b = 1 >= 18/{a+b}
done
wut😭
that's it, really
hvnt studied tht~~~
You can derive titu's lemma from AM-GM
youd need to teach me TT
I kinda forget how to do so, gimme a min
k
i think, this is not very informative
AM and HM inequality can also be used
unfortunately, my syllabus was quite different back in highschool so i'm unsure what method the others were trying to get at
but maybe instead of pulling out a random inequality you haven't learned, you should see if you can follow their lead instead
I think we overcomplicated a simple question here
Oh I see
can someone explain this one?
No idea what that is
my teacher used weighted mean
okay found the proof
Kinda weird with AM-GM tho, people usually use Cauchy-Schwarz to prove it
It also has a different name which is Engel's form of Cauchy-Schwarz 
so, (x^2/a + y^2/b )(a+b)
expand this
We'll get x^2+y^2 + bx^2/a + ay^2/b
Use AM-GM
bx^2/a + ay^2/b >= 2xy
Hence x^2+y^2 + bx^2/a + ay^2/b >= x^2+y^2 + 2xy = (x+y)^2
or
(x^2/a + y^2/b )(a+b) >= (x+y)^2
therefore x^2/a + y^2/b >= (x+y)^2/(a+b)
This's titu's lemma
which nos did u use am gm on?
bx^2/a + ay^2/b >= 2xy
ohk
doesn't Titu's give 8/a + 2/b >= (sqrt8 + sqrt2)^2 / (a + b) though?
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh i got itt
i still need to know how am hm inequality with weighted means can be usd here
remind me what AM-HM is again
arithmetic and harmonic means
I mean the formula...
yeah, tbh I barely use Am-HM
am>=hm..hm=2ab(a+b)
Like this ig
I had never used AM-HM before, this's the first time and it's pretty weird lol
Looks right
It's a+b >= 18 also
i need u to explain TT
hmm I thought it's pretty obvious
So
8/a + 2/b = 1 right
mmhm
inequality with weighted is a technique where you split the term into more terms in order to obtain the extrema we desire to find
what we want: a+b
ok....
Okay this's hard to explain 🥀

if we apply AM-HM directly, we get 8/a + 2/b > 9/(a/8 + b/2)
but we can't obtain a+b from a/8 + b/2
Notice that if I divide 8/a into 4/a + 4/a
ok.........
Then if we apply AM-Hm 4/a + 4/a + 2/b > 9/(a/4 + a/4 + b/2) = 9/(a/2 + b/2)
= 9/(a/2 + b/2) = 9/((a+b)/2) = 18/(a + b)
You see, now a+b appears
This's what we want in the first place, to obtain a+b
we got the ans
I hope you understand, inequalities are weird ahhhh
inequalities are fine
yeah basically
weighted means is a very first technique to deal with inequalities, there're tons of techniques
IInequalities As in?
In what you just did, or olympiad type of inequalities
Are we still on the same question
Ah cool, was just wondering if smth needs pinning
you're worry too much,and I have helpful in my different account anyway
In my defense I have no idea who your other account is 
Fair 
Either way, is differentiation one of the methods that was covered
Yeah, I believe so, and it's the the first one to use also
Cool cool
xavier is orange now
It feels weird yeah
cool i got 4 methods for the ques now
non of those are geometrical 🥀 sad
yikes geometrry
thnx everyone
.close
Closed by @wooden badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
😂
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to do this
Yea sure
how many times does the function cross the x-axis between 0 and 4?
4
and f reaches a maximum between each point where the function is zero, right?
maximum and minimum right
yes sorry
what's the derivative at each local maximum and minimum?
0
so how many times is f' 0
3
(mean to be clearer, at least 3)
ye
f' crosses the x axis at least thrice
ye
2?
so how many zeroes does f'' have at the least
2
similarly, can you tell me how many zeroes f''' has
1
yep
now we have to use rolles
we know f''' is zero at least one point c
f'''(c)=0
how would you use rolles to write that in terms of f''
shit I've to go I'm really sorry
bruhh
I'll try to be back in a couple of minutes
😭
forgive me once again:')
@woeful turret Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @woeful turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello is my method correct
not quite
very close, though
the perimeter is 20, but remember that the longest side must be the hypotenuse
how many marks would i get
0, unfortunately
20-4-7
and thats the hypotenous?
correct
ok thanks
np
.close
Closed by @night gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does a continuous extension of a function have to be unique? Like what exactly is a continuous extension, I find it to be a very loose definition of what it is
I don't know exactly what you mean, what definition do you base that on?
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/553347/1153468
have you checked this out? i find it to be a pretty good explanation
I have. But it only talks about evitable discontinuities
Is it only for evitable discontinuities?
yes
Then I get it
if the discontinuity is inevitable, well, it's inevitable, you can't do anything to get rid of it
Closed by @prisma egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't know where to begin
<@&286206848099549185>
Do you know what amplitude means? Like the amplitude of a sin function?
I don't know what amplitude means
On a sin function, its basically the max height of the function
the height is infinite though
Yep, so no amplitude is a valid answer
hmm
What about the period?
Like time, period is "how long" it takes to repeat
In this case, how far along the x-axis does it take to repeat
i noticed some limits
Yep
so (-oo, -270) U (-270, -90) U (-90,oo)
That would be the whole domain of the function, although the bounds toward +/- infinity isnt quite correct
What do you think happens if you were to look further to the right of the graph?
For bigger values of x
Also, I should probably ask, do you know what function this is a graph of?
nah
i think there might be another limit if we look further
Its some form of tan(x), not sure if youd know unless you were shown it
Yes, youre right, vertical limit that is
oh yeah, i didn't learn it yet
It'll repeat like that forever, just like any trig function repeats
So, for the period, bow far does each x value go before it repeats
oh okay i see
i counted and it spans 180 units
text unfortunately
so for the period, do i just enter 180?
it says for the format of answer to enter an integer, so i just entered 180
Text inputs in myopenmath is a travesty
Yeah should be fine, im not sure what it would want for amplitude
Sometimes they define amplitude directly as the coefficint $a$ in the expression $a\cdot\sin(b(x-c)) + d$
Coolempire93
let me see if theres anything in formula sheet, not sure why i would check that tho
So whatever comes before your tan should be it
lol nothing
wait what
(which is stupid for trig functions other than sin and cos mind you but some people do it)
And then the function we know is a transformation of tan(x). Normally, tan increases as x increases (before repeating), but its flipped vertically.
well tan is decreasing in this case while x is increasing (edited)
how is this related to what we are talking about
<@&268886789983436800>
Bot or scam
both
Or both lol
both!
Yeah so to flip a function across the x-axis, you just negate it
And that should end up being your answer, no extra transformations needed
so its just -tan(x)?
but what about the period
Oh, if you notice its tan(0) = 0, so its already at the origin, it doesnt need to be shifted
oh yeah i noticed, thank you ill plug that in now, f(x) = -tan(x)
And the period of tan(x) is naturally 180, so it doesnt need to be stretched or anything
ahh i see, teacher gavve no lessons for chapter 1 saying it was easy lol
If you have to put a number for amplitude, maybe try 1, since it isnt squashed vertically
This makes the amplitude 1 by the way (if undefined doesn't work as an asnwer)
What weaboo said
can u guys teach me why 1 should be amplitude
Well normally amplitude is the distance from the middle to the top/bottom of a sin or cos graph. Basically, it describes how stretched it is vertically. But tan doesnt have a top or bottom cuz it goes infinitely, but you coukd describe how stretched vertically it is (which would be like multiplying by some number). In this case, the graph isnt stretched vertically, so its like multiplying by 1
<@&268886789983436800>
why did u call mods
I clicked on one of those by accident, and I think i heard of people getting a virus just from clicking an image so I got scared lol
Another scam
virus from clicking an image?
I could be mistaken
i think he means from clicking an attachment link?
Maybe an image link
i hope those scammers rot
Like to a website
ok i get the multiplying by 1 thing, alright well thank you for your help so much

!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @rough wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i wanted to say bye to weaboo
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have a confusion in this....will it be complete like 0 is a limit point and the cauchy sequence does converge to 0 but in whole space 0 doesn't even exist...and it's not like the whole space is subset of a bigger one too so...and like whole metric space is closed too I'm not really getting it
Wdym by "0 is a limit point"?
If a sequence in X is cauchy (with respect to d), then it would have to converge in X
That is if X is complete
i mean if I tend x to inf then it would converge to 0
and what would y be
any other term
There's some idea in this, but we need a clear sequence
So x_n = ...
And then compute |x_n - x_m|
already youre thinking of a sequence if youre saying "tend x to inf"
you just gotta mention an example of such a sequence
i mean shouldn't I look for a case where it would kind of disprove completion
we're doing that arent we
That's literally what we're doing
yes
for the record, do you personally believe (X, d) is complete (mb)?
Well... give us such a sequence
Did you omit "complete"?
including 0 isnt exactly clear rn so we're going to leave the exact 'form' of 0 out
You think adding 0 to X would make it complete?
yes ig
if you dont have an exact idea of what form this 0 would take, then we can find out what it exactly looks like later on
at least, you dont think this "zero" would be in X
so you dont believe (X, d) is complete?
yes it is cauchy as xn.xm would tend to increase but idk about convergent
(X, d) is incomplete, so we'll have to look for a counterexample Cauchy sequence that can show that
okay
lets try something first
okk
yes
it can be really simple
identity fn
[1,inf)
f(x) = x is not a sequence though
for one, youre allowing for any real number index
since you said [1, inf) is the domain
i meant in a sense taking all values as it is
for example, I can say the 4.45th term is 4.45
yes in that way
just list the terms of sequence
okay
sequences usually only have 1st terms, 2nd terms, 3rd terms, 4th terms, etc.
your sequence currently has an uncountable number of terms
you should just settle with the sequence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...
okayy
now before we continue,
heres how you would say this sequence your way
we have $f(x)=x$ as before but we have the domain be the positive integers
mtt
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ...}
we read this function as f(index) = term at that index
so f(7) is the 7th term (which is 7)
another example of a sequence is f(x) = x^2 with the domain of positive integers
okay
this would represent the sequence 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, ...
the 8th term is f(8) = 64
make sense?
yesyes
alr be sure to choose the correct domain next time
alr we've got our identity sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...
now lets match this with the usual notation:
okk
Define the sequence ${x_n}_{n=1,2,...}$ as $x_n=n$
mtt
okk
now you were mentioning something about Cauchy about this sequence
yes
especially with stuff like this
so what do you want to prove about xn
that after some N dist between xn and xm will be less than epsilon
n,m being greater than N
well you technically never said you wanted to prove that xn is Cauchy
you gotta mention that
okok
but yea we gotta show xn is Cauchy
ok
alr go try this out
remember your distance is d(x, y) = |1/x - 1/y| instead of |x - y|
yess
you should be able to figure out an N
N which is really large
have you done epsilon-delta proofs before
yes
you always had your delta be some function of mainly epsilon, right
yes
now this isnt really showing that a sequence converges, just that its Cauchy
so instead of "epsilon-delta" we have "epsilon-N"
that only changes the delta to an N really
so in place of a delta, we have xm and xn with m, n > N
now as before, you should try and find an expression for N based on epsilon
where when m, n > N, its always the case that d(xm, xn) < epsilon
N= n2 . epsilon?
kind of lost touch with epsilon delta proofs
n2?
n is any term
usually when you write n2, that means $2n$
mtt
and n^2
it means n^2 if you never learned the ^ symbol ebfore
youre not at that age anymore
you need to use ^ for power
okay sorry
go write it again with the ^
N= n^2. epsilon
yess
the n^2 . epsilon doesnt exactly make sense
since you have to start with an epsilon then pick an N
oh
think about it like if you have |x - a| < delta,
you wouldnt know what the x is
same thing for the m and n
that being said youre a bit close
lets take an example
lets say epsilon = 1/2
now the requirements of a Cauchy sequence are:
,,\forall\epsilon>0,\exists N\in\mathbb N,\forall m,n\ge N,d(x_m,x_n)<\epsilon
mtt
compare that to the epsilon-delta version:
,,\forall\epsilon>0,\exists\delta>0,\forall|x-a|<\delta,|f(x)-f(a)|<\epsilon
mtt
hmm yes
(this isnt exactly how you write it but I made them look similar)
okk
now as before, you begin with epsilon and a
and then you figure out a delta based on that epsilon and a, right?
yes
this time you just have epsilon
that being said you did square the n
yes
where did the squaring idea come from? it could work
because both terms are greater than N so took x= n and and other would be n+N and then ig I just assumed N to be small so I ignored it
okk
I dont know if youve done this before, but maybe youve heard of epsilon-delta as a game
I say epsilon = 1/2, you say a (positive) delta where |x-a| < delta means |f(x) - f(a)| < epsilon
okk
now instead of that, we're doing this for a Cauchy sequence
okk
so I say epsilon = 1/2, and you then need to figure out an N where m, n > N would mean d(xm, xn) < 1/2
now as before, you should try simplifying some things before trying this out
what does d(xm, xn) < epsilon simplify to?
(2.m)/(2+m) \leq n
you need to mention the other requirement
for epsilon = 1/2
2m / (2 + m) < n isnt the only equation you were supposed to find
go show your work on how you got 2m / (2 + m) < n
n \in ( 2/m(m+2), 2/m(2-m))?
go show your work
also thats not what youre intended to find
youre skipping quite a lot
this would not be useful to find an N
you should show more work to leave more of it useful to get an N from, ok?
you should be showing all of your work actually
ok
so this time go show your work
how did you get this
I know youre not going to show a screenshot, so Im going to ask you to explicitly show the steps you write down
instead of just "yeah uhhh heres what I was doing"
opening the d(xm,xn) \leq ep
okk
instead of just "yeah uhhh heres what I was doing"
Im going to ask you to explicitly show the steps you write down
okk
picture works if you wrote it down
it should be really quick to send your work over, like 15 seconds quick
its just wherever you wrote stuff down
okk
alr remember what youre trying to find
N?
you need to find an N where m, n > N would always guarantee that |1/m - 1/n| < 1/2
yes
now what you wrote down isnt exactly useful for that purpose
for one, this is negative
oh yeah
we'll need a different idea if we want to get this to work
okok
nbd of this?
sorry I'm used to using neighbourhood as nbd
then thats not correct either
ohk
tell me what a neighborhood would be then
yes
the definition of neighborhood is instead |this - x| < r
r is fixed, and the x where that is true would be in the neighborhood
okok
okkk
so |this - that| represents how far apart this and that are
yess
now the this and the that are 1/m and 1/n
now lets think, what would be a lower and upper bound of 1/m and 1/n?
alr, so 1/m and 1/n are always numbers inside (0, 1], right
yess
now if we require that |1/m - 1/n| < 1/2
that would mean the 1/m and the 1/n are less than 1/2 apart
yess
now do you think that would be possible if 1/m and 1/n were in (0, 1]?
yes if I take both n,m greater than 2
just > 2 is ok
ok
look at that, you found an N
oh
the N (which is 2) is based on the epsilon (which is 1/2)
now where did you get that 2 from?
okay
just keep elaborating until I think youre good
since the distance has to be less than 1/2 if I take m large enough and keep n constant at max i.e 2 since it has to be less than 1/2
then after then I generalized n too
since the absolute diff will be stay less than 1/2
for eaxmple, where did you get the "max i.e. 2" part from
i just thought that if n is 1 (since n is natural) it would not work for every m...so to generalize n=2 works...so triangle inequality ig
thats good enough
if you had m or n = 1
then |1 - 1/3| > 1/2
however if you have m, n > 2,
yes
what would a new upper bound of 1/m, 1/n be?
1/2
and since 1/m and 1/n are always in (0, 1/2],
that assures us that |1/m - 1/n| < 1/2
right
yes
now we've got something good
lets try this for any epsilon
first, lets say epsilon is always 1 / natural number
what would you assign N to be?
and remember for epsilon = 1/2 you came up with N = 2
epsilon
and from before, 0 < 1/m and 0 < 1/n
so since 0 < 1/m < epsilon and 0 < 1/n < epsilon,
yess
yes
now that would be the whole proof, so it remains for us to prove that
essentially you need to prove that:
x, y in (0, epsilon] => |x - y| < epsilon
this is more of algebra than anything real
if you want, you can do (0, epsilon) instead since it seems you were taught m, n > N instead of m, n > N
Closed by @ivory peak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np, but I was just waiting for you to tell me whether you figured out the proof or not @ivory peak
.reopen just in case
✅ Original question: #help-49 message
I did figure it out but I just realized I need to work more on my basics and tomorrow I have an exam so kind of time bounded...but thank you again
ok thats good
were still sort of not done because of some details about this proof
the major one is that this is not at all a proof that you would expect at first
you can ask another question any time, but for now lets focus on how this proof went
you know the way you proved this is sort of familiar to how I used to do things
in high school you usually learn a list of problems and a list of methods
then you just connect the dots, method to method, until any problem can be broken apart into methods that solve them
usually the problem makes this clear, you get more used to what a method can do and how it can be used as you move on
does this make sense so far?
yes it did
now youre presented with a proof, which unfortunately is a lot more open-ended
for a proof, you also need to allow intuitive ways to do things in as well
hm yes
for example theres no way the algebra way of solving this (which got you those two bounds on n) wouldve figured this out
we had to take a different perspective into things
thats also why I figured what you mentioned at first could be useful
yes
you mentioned theres a "zero" that was supposed to be in X but isnt?
ig I will reopen .reopen
it was already opened
oh
I did .reopen earlier
thanks
I want you to try and take a guess at what this 0 should be
heres a hint
X is [1, infinity)
but the distance does 1/ the number before doing |this - that| on them
its |1/x - 1/y| after all
yes
so what would you include in X here?
it may not be a number
think about where the numbers of X become after you 1/ them
i what sense
theres no other sense than including an extra element in X to make (X, d) complete
that element isnt a real number
what would it be?
so we need to include an element which isn't real ?
its not complex either
its not considered a number
remember from earlier?
whats the definition of complete?
every cauchy seqn in X is convergent in X
alr, and 1, 2, 3, 4, ... is a Cauchy sequence, right?
what does 1, 2, 3, 4, ... converge to?
it doesn't I meant in 1/n sense
it doesn't converge
it doesnt look like youre opening your mind enough to new ideas
wait wait
its not in X, but X is every number 1 and above
we know it doesnt converge to a number of any sort
if only we had a symbol for it
1, 2, 3, 4, ... is said to diverge if we cannot find something it converges to
yes
but lets say we include things that arent numbers
then 1, 2, 3, 4, ... will converge
what does 1, 2, 3, 4, ... converge to?
inf?
yes
okk
we can use the extended reals
([1, infinity], d) would be complete instead
the easiest way to notice this is:
d always does 1/ the numbers before measuring the distance the normal way
so instead of X, we can consider 1/X, the version of X that d only seems to use
1 / [1, infinity) is (0, 1], isnt it
yess
and (0, 1] isnt even closed
so it cant be complete
for example, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ... -> 0
and 0 isnt in (0, 1], right?
yes
now we consider the X version
we have 12, 3, 4, ... -> infinity
and infinity isnt in [1, infinity)
if we were to include infinity in the set,
then 1 / [1, +infinity] = [0, 1]
and that way we can be certain itll be complete
yes
keep in mind this defines 1/0 = infinity and 1/infinity = 0
ok
this isnt always the case you know
so far we stuck to only working with positive numbers for our problem
if the numbers were also negative, 1/-infinity = 0 too and we'd be in a bit of a problem with 1/0
yesd
so we're only using infinity in the extended reals to represent an element that would be the limit of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... and any other otherwise diverging sequence
yes
now naturally youd have to confirm again that this new (X u {infinity}, d) is still a metric space
to be honest, it might not even be a metric space anymore
okay
now regardless of whether we consider infinity or not,
the fact that 1 / [1, infinity) = (0, 1] which is not closed is important
that alone is what showed me where to go in this problem
the distance function always does 1/
and in the 1/ version, we end up with numbers that arent in a closed set
1/m and 1/n can get as close to 0 as they like but never 0 itself
yes
noticing a thing like this is not easy, and I dont think it can be taught
you notice more convenient patterns or even more abstract promising details over time
the usual algebra ways wouldnt have shown any of this
hmm okay
now finding those facts on the spot may not be easy, but you could settle with the next best thing
you consider them as tricks, then you remember them as extra methods you can use
you add to your 'dictionary' of methods you try out
okok
each new trick you see, you try and use and see the point of doing
then that way, now you can use the same trick just as they used it
sometimes the problems in your homework/test will be structured this way:
1(a): identity or fact that seems a bit general
(b): harder problem that uses 1(a) as a trick
its trying to get you to recognize, then use, something useful
okay okay
where I am confused is
that how should I even imagine space like X
that
the result distance function gives
should be in space or not
the result distance function gives is a distance
X is just where the points are
X does not include how far apart they are
that would be d(X, X)
for example, d(1, 2) = 1/2
1/2 isnt in X, doesnt have to be
1/2 is in d(X, X), the set of all distances you get out of X
d(X, X) doesnt need to have anything to do with X
so the reason it's not complete is because it leads to inf so 1/inf leads to 0 and 1/x can be never be 0?
you can view it that way
you can also view it like "the distance function is the same as |x - y| for 1/X, and theres no way |x - y| for (0, 1] is complete"
ohhk
either way works
youre essentially saying that 0 shouldve been in d(X, X) for that sequence but it wasnt
0 is in d(X, X) though
you can do d(2, 2) = 0
so what if I take another metric space and the sequence converges to a certain number that is not in space...would it still be complete...( not talking about dist )
by definition it would not be complete
complete spaces mean any cauchy sequence will always converge to something in the space
you find a cauchy sequence that converges to something outside the space, its not complete
like whole space is rationals only no reals subset or anything then I form a seqn converging to root 2
yep
so basically if in a metric space I'm left hanging it's not complete
yea
just as before, you were looking for hanging things
1, 2, 3, 4, ... is Cauchy because the distances -> 0
but what ic vonerges to (infinity or no number at all) isnt in X
Closed by @twilit jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
dont leave a space between the . and the close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Quick question in part (2). That's just Z mod 2 right
$Z /2Z = {a + 2\Z \mid a \in \Z }$
wai
yes
I suppose instead of multiplying it first and then modding each term by 2 I can do it beforehand?
yes
so p(x) mod 2 is really x^2+1
as -3mod 2 is 1 and -5 mod 2 is 1
and 7x^3+33x-4 is x^3+x
if you have multiplied it out in (a) already then just reduce afterwards...
I didn't do (a) as that's just regular poly multiplication
1 help channel is crazy
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is 92 half of 99?
why are you becoming the very thing you swore to destroy
<@&268886789983436800> troll
these guys were playing the game run escape, im so confused
1+1=2
nobodys here, so im enjoying the empty space
no
Cool
Yes ofc
I'm pretty sure it didn't but wanted confirmation
It does
@shadow scaffold lying
Wth

Rude



