#help-49
1 messages Β· Page 236 of 1
in your assignment though you needed to find (2A)^{-1} thats why I suggested it
2A * (2A)^-1 = 1
These are matrices now, so we get I, not 1
Do you know what I looks like, for a 2x2 matrix?
yes
yes
What does it look like?
ill draw it
Okay looks good, although we don't need to write out the whole matrix just yet
So we have this atm:
(2A) (2A)^-1 = I
yes
yes
divide both sides by 2?
Yes
(2A) (2A)^-1 = I
2 A (2A)^-1 = I
A (2A)^-1 = 1/2 I
Oki doki
Do you know about pre-multiplying and post-multiplying?
Okay
is that always the case btw
It's possible for AB = BA but most of the time it doesn't
oh ok
It's not guaranteed to be the case like with numbers
For numbers, ab = ba
But for matrices, it's not true
yes
This means that when we multiply both sides of an equation by a matrix, we have to be careful about whether we're multiplying at the start (pre-multiplying) or the end (post-multiplying)
If M = ABC:
Pre-multiply by D -> DM = DABC
Post-multiply by D -> MD = ABCD
okay
divide?
Divide by what?
A
How do you divide by a matrix?
they gave me a formula
think about the scalars
you can always multiply both sides of a matrix equation by a scalar
You don't need a formula
What we've discussed so far is enough
We're here at the moment:
A (2A)^-1 = 1/2 I
we want (2A)^-1
Which means we need to get rid of A, right?
right
i cant think of anything other than division π
What does I (2A)^-1 = ?
idk
What does multiplying by I do?
what if the RHS was just I instead of (1/2)I?
^^^
so (2A)^-1
oh nm you did that step already
How do we turn A into I?
multiply it by its inverse
Yes!
yesir
But we need to be careful which side we multiply it on
how do i know
You can think of multiplying by the inverse as being the matrix equivalent of division, if it helps
A (2A)^-1 = 1/2 I
So we have this
If we post-multiply by A^-1, we get:
A (2A)^-1 A^-1 = 1/2 I A^-1
Because the A and A^-1 are split around the (2A)^-1, we can't combine them
Because matrix multiplication is not commutative
So we need to pre-multiply by A
yes
Basically, if you want a matrix to go away, you need to put its inverse next to it
So we need to pre-multiply by A^-1
No
Right and left are both fine
Because A A^-1 = A^-1 A = I
That's not a given since matrix multiplication is not commutative
But it can be proved and it is true
yes
So A A^-1 and A^-1 A are both I
true
And that means you can put it on either side
I usually see it as the definition of inverse
for groups, matrices, etc, that it has to commute
Potentially, but if we've stated that matrix multiplication doesn't commute in general, then we should prove it works in this case. If you want to define it that way, you have to prove it exists. Otherwise, you have to prove that it's commutative.
So if we pre-multiply by A^-1, we get:
A^-1 A (2A)^-1 = A^-1 1/2 I
Right?
oooooooooooh
Although I would write the 1/2 before the A^-1
can i do this method whenever i wanna find any inverse
Well
The reason this is useful is because in Part A, you found A^-1 already
If you didn't know A^-1 already, this wouldn't be as useful
But if you know what A^-1 is, and they ask you to find a different inverse that is related to A^-1, you can do this
I suppose you can also use this method to find any inverse you like, but that's simply where the formula they've given you comes from
i dont jhavbe to prove it exists if it's defined as existing iff it's a right and left inverse
how about if i wanna find any inverse ?
more than one approach, but that's how it was taught to me and thats how I taught it to LNRD earlier
do i start with the fact that A * A^-1 = I?
The formula they've given you is the result of that process
for matrices 3x3 or larger there are algorithms, there aren't any formulations so nice and tidy as the smaller cacses
but isnt that only for 2x2
Yes
You could attempt to try to solve that equation for larger matrices
But it would be excruciating
You'd have a system of 9 equations to solve for a 3x3
But for matrices larger than 2x2, there is an algorithm to follow
That evaluates the inverse
there is a special case that is very easy and quick for large matrices, a very specific kind
diagonal matrices
Finding matrix inverses is somewhat painful, so being able to do some matrix algebra is helpful if you have to do more than one of them
that's when all the non-diagonal elements are 0
it's invertible if and only if none of the diagonal elements are 0, and the inverse is just you take the inverse of each number on the diagonal
Going back to here:
It makes sense that (2A)^-1 = 1/2 A^-1
Because we can pull out scalar multiples from matrices
So if we have:
(2A) (2A)^-1 = I
Then we get:
2 A (1/2) A^-1 = I
And the 2 and 1/2 cancel out
So we should consider that to be the expected result
Also, matrices are generally used to represent geometric transformations
And multiplying by 2 is equivalent to an enlargement by a factor of 2
The matrix inverse is the opposite transformation
So that should involve an enlargement by a factor of 1/2
To shrink it back down again
oh ok
Does that all make sense now?
i guess yeah
Oki doki
i mean i understand how to find something in that particular position
but not generally
for any matrix
3x3 for example
If you haven't covered that, don't worry about it
It's a complicated procedure
Hmm
Okay well you have to follow a procedure to do it
That's still 2x2
You could attempt to do that
can i do it to 3x3
Yes, but it would be difficult
But you could if you wanted to
You'd end up with a system of 9 simultaneous equations
That would work but there is a faster method to do it
what is it?
damnn
I can send you a link to another textbook that covers some matrix stuff if you like
If you don't like your current one
It isn't
But that is one method you can use
It's this
and this works for any 3x3?
Yes
That's not 3x3
Well they want you to use Gauss-Jordan Elimination for that one
But if you want to do it this way just to try, we can
does that method work for all 3x3?
Yes
There are 3 methods for finding the inverse of a matrix, and all 3 work for all 3x3 matrices
ohh
- Method of cofactors
- Gauss-Jordan Elimination
- Cayley-Hamilton Theorem
This is the method of cofactors
life would be 10x easier
The Cayley-Hamilton theorem one is a little bit more advanced so might not be useful to you at this point
The other two are standard methods for your level
If you have a test on Gauss-Jordan Elimination, it might be a good idea to do that one
You're nearly done
bro idk
im giving up
it looks like theres no way im gonna finish that ever
You're 2 steps away
(don't let the numbers sucking scare you off)
bro i feel like numbers are just gonna keep coming
You can use the middle row to finish the last row, and then the last row to finish the top row and you're done
youre right π
wait btw
are there 3x3 matrixes that arent inversable
invertable *
Yes
Any matrix with a determinant of 0 is not invertible
That's one advantage of the method of cofactors
Since Step 1 is to find the determinant, if it's 0 you can just stop there
the zero matrix
less trivially, any matrix which projects space onto a plane, intuitively because information is lost
in general though do you always just use intuition to eliminate the numbers?
like is there not a pattern
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
how does that work
The system can be written as
Ax = b,
If you know the inverse then after mulitplying on the left by A^-1 you get
x = A^-1 * b
whats Ax = b
A is the matrix describing the linear system of equations
x is the vector (x1,x2,x3) i.e. your variables
b is vector of the constants in your equations
In this case b=(1, -2, 4)
vectors? all i know is a vector has a direction and magnitude, idk how this is a vector
and also, can all linear systems be rewritten like that? and was that the only way to solve for part b? is to rewrite it in that way specifically??
Yes!
You could just solve it normally
In linear algebra vectors have a generlzition which using vector spaces.
For this context you can think of them as R^n, i.e. n-tuples of real numbers
So here the vectors are 3-tuples. And you can extract direction and magnitude from them given you have a correct notion of them
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Yes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@white moss Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with exercice 2
Can translate if needed
i dont get this
Show the equivalence of the following statements
thats not very helpful 
Yea
what does that even mean
that any parallelogram satisfying any one of (i), (ii), (iii) also satisfies all three
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1 but i missed the class where this was explained and its due in 1 hour soo
lol
usually in "the following are equivalent" proofs, you prove them in a little circle
(i) => (ii) => (iii) => (i)
no cheating
/j
so you only need to write three proofs, theoretically
Ig
start with i \implies ii
Do i jus say that since i says that its a rectangle ii is true because all angles of a rectangle and 90degrees
you can phrase it a little nicer, but yeah (i) => (ii) sounds pretty straightforward
Okok
... although how (i) saying "P is a rectangle" is equivalent to "one of the angles is right" is strange
Yea idk
it feels more like that blurb should be attributed to (ii)
or
idk
like the blurb of (i) should be the whole statement of (ii) and vice versa, that sounds slightly less trivial and more acceptable
it isnt
but whatever
a rectangle is literally just a ||gm with a right angle
sure but that at least requires like two whole lines of algebra to demonstrate
i think its a basic fact
it's basic but not immediate
You cant just write one line
in our geo courses we defined a ||gm first and defined a rectangle with that
You cant just sau because u know it
well provided there's a way to define rectangles independently of parallelograms, I'd say it's not immediate
Can i say that since we know atleast 1 angle is a right angle the rest are also right because the sum is 360
no, you also need to use the fact that P=ABCD is a parallelogram
π«©
you can make a quadrilateral with a single right angle that is not a rectangle
but if you ask that quadrilateral be a parallelogram, then it is also a rectangle
Huh
what's your definition of a parallelogram?
No but what did u mean by if u ask that """
I mean, if you subject a quadrilateral with a 90 degree angle to the additional constraint that the quadrilateral is also a parallelogram, then you can deduce that it is a rectangle
"ask that X has P(X)" means "if we (also) assume that X has property P"
sorry for the confusion
Im so lost rn
this is not sufficient, because this does not use the fact that your given object is a parallelogram
it is not sufficient because there is a quadrilateral with a 90 degree angle that is not a parallelogram nor a rectangle
Ahh
so somewhere in your proof, you need to include a fact about parallelograms
So ehat would i say for i
that's up to you
I can't tell you what to write, it's not my homework, and I'd be stealing the experience from you
my french is also terrible, I'm thankful the sentence structure is similar enough
Okok
@uneven relic Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
. @cedar pawn in case you don't know, preface a message with a . to avoid provoking the bot
Okay. The issue here was that some previous messages hadn't loaded yet
So I didn't realise there was a huge gap
But thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello can anyone help me find the period lol? i got 3 but i donβt think its right
What is the period of a function
Functions on LHS and RHS are different
which one are you asking for?
the right
2pi/3
yes, how did you get that?
Have you gottten the funciton of this graph?
If you don't have the equation then you can't really use the formula
B value can be acquired by knowing the period
but what you're literally looking for is the period
What does it show
Where did u get that?
and when i graph it on desmos im getting a different graph than the question
2pi/(2pi/3)
The function can be shifted, the one in your question has been either left shifted or right shifted, depending the the magnitude
Closed by @turbid karma
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
β
@turbid karma wait, lemme show you the function
Huh
Lmao
I'm picturing you frantically trying to switch accounts to reopen the channel before the bot banishes it to hidden
LOL
@turbid karma If you're curious, this is what the function supposed to be after you shift it
bro is going to modmail me π
.solved
Closed by @pearl hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Have a good one
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Heya, I am trying to figure out an equation and solve for X. The information I have is that the total value is 100,000. But to get 100,000 I need to buy X amount of units. Each unit costs 1,750. But every time I buy a unit, the price of a unit increases by one. Like 1 unit is 1750, but two units is 1,751 and so on. Everytime I buy a unit the total value gained is 13.
Well what have you tried so far
OP?
The person asking the question
I thought it mightβve been exponential
But I donβt know how to change e like value if it.
Because it wonβt be a sharp slope for mx+b so thereβs gotta be an exponent but Iβm stuck in the exponent that increases every value if x
Could you show us the original question
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
no i dont think it would be an exponential fn
u should use AP
Itβs not an original question, just a real world problem Iβve come up with
Well it isn't very clear here, cuz you want to generate 100,000 value. And every purchase gives you 13 value
So that gives you x directly
And then if you want to calculate the total price, that's just the sum of an AP
But every unit that gives me 13 value, I have to give 1,750 and every unit I buy of that 1,750 unit it increases by one. So like 1,750 X 1=13, then 1,751 x 2 =26 and so on until I get to 100,000
@lapis falcon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lapis falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\alpha( \alpha(x_1)) = \alpha (\alpha(x_2)) \implies x_1=x_2$. It is this one-one.
wai
its just that alpha is its own inverse
Canβt you say alpha is a bijection because there exists alpha^-1 which is alpha ?
hmm, does that work?
as long as invertible functions are also injective and surjective, yeah
One more question
Can I have a hint
Like I suppose I have to break it down
$\alpha^{5} = \alpha^{-1}$;
$\beta^4 = \beta^{-1}$
I suppose I can use this
wai
You can use that sign is a homomorphism
haven;t done that
$\alpha^{-1}\beta^{-1} \alpha^{-1} \beta^{-2} \alpha^{-1}$
wai
yea
but I don't know if \alpha and \beta are disjoint
it doesn't matter!
why not
just write each of them as a product of cycles
And the parity of the amount of cycles is the overall parity
We are not talking about order
right $\alpha$ can be written as the product of 5 transpositions
wai
and \beta 4
so alpha is odd, beta is even
Overall its odd
We haven't done homomorphims in class, so I can't use themπ
But you know the concept right?
homomorphism is an isomoprhism but not bijective
we usually start with introducing homomorphisms and then isomorphisms
I did isomorphims in LA
that's how I know thjem
in LA?
LIn ALg
yeah I know what you mean
but isomorphism are boring in linear algebra
since any two vector spaces of the same dimension are isomorphic
in groups they are a lot more interesting
wanna hear something cool?
sure
you know An?
The alternating group, yea
its a normal subgroup of Sn since its the kernel of the sign homomorphism. Now, for n>=5 its the only non-trivial proper normal subgroup of Sn
Its pretty annoying to prove this
do you have any more questions?
@twilit field Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Its asking for the current (I) across the "45" resistance
what I tried was the following;
I_45 : 45 = I_t : R_t
current across 45 / 45 (the resistance) = total current / total resistance
reducing whatever the fuck this is, R_t = 45
I_45 : 45 = I_t : 45
I across 45 = Total I
total I = 180/45
I_45=4
nope. its wrong
what went wrong?
Got it! ty for possibly looking and attempting to help π
.close
Closed by @slate ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please tell me what is wrong with this? I am trying to multiply 11 and 13 using add-and-shift algorithm, but I am not getting the correct result
do you have a precise and exact writeup of the add-and-shift algo
idk why my question was so pleonastic but whatever
it is not given in the lecture material, but let me see if I can find it online
not sure if it counts, but it is the best thing i could find
basically, the idea is that we check q0, and if:
- it is 1:
we add M to AC and then shift C AC Q to right (by 1 bit) - it is 0:
we simply shift C AC Q to right (by 1 bit)
also, it is Q here and not A
ah
figured it out
.close
Closed by @proud abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hm?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
misclicked sorry
sorry im new
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with 11
i tried doing the f(2+h) - f(2) / (2+h) - 2 thing for (a), i think im misleading myself tho
i know i need to find a triangle
i think
representing the difference between two points
2 and 2+h
Have you learnt other ways of finding the derivative
Apart from this
i know the derivative rule, but it was from outside sources and not in class
a^3 = 3a^2
the slope in other words
is kinda like the secant?
right
just needs to intersect the graph at two points
Slope about a point of the graph is the slope of the tangent about that point
so then how do i find the slope
To find the slope we first need the derivative
But we will also require the chain rule for this
whats that
It is basically a way of finding derivatives of composite functions
Let y= f(g(x)) now
y' = f'(g(x)) * g'(x)
Are you aware of the notation d/dx
a little
Nevermind that isn't really a good method
For now we just assume this is true
It might not be the best explanation so i would highly recommend looking it up online
aah alright
After you have done the chain rule and power rule the question will be quite easy
@green dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @green dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I just need a key
63+27 = 17+73 = 90
i have a feeling i have seen this exact question before 
Use sin(90-Q)=cosQ
cos(90-Q)=sinQ
SinΒ²Q+cosΒ²Q=1
Yeah!! That's why I said I lost the key
you should recall the identities that jay just conveniently posted for you.
That doesn't work @lyric charm had told me
Yeah! I know the identities
ok so apply them
Let Me do it
i also think that you may have misremembered me, or misunderstood me, or read me only partially, or all 3.
wdym doesnt work? I am not saying numerator and denominator are 90. I am saying the angles are complementary, and hinting towards what jayy explicitly stated
Ohh
I tried but the irregular number of angles bothering me
irregularity of the numbers is irrelevant here
ok lets start with just one application
and hope that you dont get an allergic reaction to it
focus on \textbf{only} the term $\sin^2(27\dg)$.
Ann
i claim you can apply one of the co-function identities to it.
A) sin(x) = cos(90-x)
B) cos(x) = sin(90-x)
work out which one, then apply it and say what you get. ONLY this term, i repeat ONLY THIS TERM and don't go back to the full expression yet. only this term.
instructions clear? @sage zodiac
Umm!! I'll try
this should not take you a lot of time.
The answer is 1 found it yet?
I already know the answer
Can you do it now?
Yeah!
But can I solve this by just using sinΒ²A + CosΒ²A=1
And SecΒ²A-tanΒ²A=1
CosecΒ²A-CotΒ²A=1
@gleaming hearth using the above identities?
Yesh
How?
I get it
But I didn't want to use sin(90-x)=cosx identity becuz this topic is cutted out @gleaming hearth
That's why I was stuck
Not allowed to use sin(90-x)=cosx?
Lol I don't know but is there a way to solve this without those identity?
I don't think so
wait what
cut out?
as in your teacher specifically said it's haram?
or just never taught and somehow absent from syllabus?
That topic is cutted out
@lyric charm tell me
This is all I have
Ο=180β° btw if you wonder
cos(x) = sin(90-x) @gleaming hearth these type of
Thanks for your hardwork I will save it
I sent it
trig identities are an open class
so there's no way to give you an exact count
especially because there exist plenty of identities that are learned in some regions/curricula and not others
Oh ohk
i dont think anybody gives a shit about the identity for cos(5x) even though it definitely is out there
Hm
Thanks guys
.close
Closed by @sage zodiac
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Consider a positive integer $a > 1$. If $a$ is not a perfect square then at the next move we add $3$ to it and if it is a perfect square we take the square root of it. Define the trajectory of a number $a$ as the set obtained by performing this operation on $a$. For example the cardinality of $3$ is ${3, 6, 9}$.
Find all $n$ such that the cardinality of $n$ is finite.
Triaengle
I am unable to prove that n=1mod3 do not work
@rare maple Has your question been resolved?
n=1mod3 does work as then n^2=1mod3 too
so there exists a way to continue to add 3 into n so that n becomes n^2, and the cardinality becomes finite
With the examples I have tried it doesn't seem possible
I have tried a lot of values and the pattern I am observing is that it of of the square roots is always =-1mod3
hmm
What I was thinking of trying was that the assuming we encounter no number n = (3k+2)Β²
The function is decreasing
And it will at some point go below 16
From where I can prove that it doesn't work
@rare maple Has your question been resolved?
I think we can definitely prove that with any n=(3k+2)^2 in the set the cardinality would be infinite
as k^2=1 or 0 mod3 only
Yes
We can use induction to prove that if the chain start with 3n+1 wil result in (3k+2)^2
then (3(n+1)+1) will result in a (3k+2)^2 to
How do I do that
@rare maple Has your question been resolved?
@rare maple Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
every number 0 or 1 mod 3 fulfills finite cardinality
Pretty sure not every 1 mod 3 does
Infact I am inclined to think that none of the 1mod3 work
I am unable to prove the 1mod3 part
"observation"
well
let's start with the fact that 4 and 16 are infinite cardinality
Since the only 1 mod 3 square number with finite cardinality from 1 to 16 is 1
That means every 1 mod 3 number up till 16^2, excluding 1, is infinite as well
And since the only finite cardinality square number from 1 to 16^2 is 1
that means every 1 mod 3 number up till 16^4 is also infinite
that's the idea at least
can write it formally but too lazy
Do you follow?
how do we conclude that
Let's say you have any number 16 < n=3k+1 < 16^2
The procedure is to add 3 to it until it is a square number
but this square number is less than or equal to 16^2 (It is guaranteed to hit 16^2 or square number below)
thanks for the help ]

Closed by @rare maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800> scam
yay casinos
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Are these right? Specifically the restrictions.
For the first graph I have my domain from (-inf,inf) and range (-inf, 7) and for the second graph (-inf,6] and range (-inf, 9)
why does the domain of the second function stop at 6?
The closed circle at 6,9
It doesnβt continue after the fact no?
If there was an arrow it would be infinite
But it doesnβt have that
if that's the case, your piecewise function should probably state the upper bound of the last definition.
Sorry can you dumb that down for me
I kind of notice the last restriction is x greater than/equal to 3
So the domain would be negative inf to inf right?
if you intend for the last definition to be applicable only up to x = 9, then the upper bound of the last definition should indicate that (right here).
The stuff on the sharpie is what the teacher wrote so now I know it wonβt be applicable to just x = 9 but beyond that
So it would be (-inf, inf) for the domain right?
that depends. are you defining the function based on the graph, or are you drawing the graph based on the definition?
which one is given first - the graph, or the definition?
The graph
then that means the graph takes priority, and you should respect the domain set by the graph.
So would the domain be from negative infinity to infinity
I don't see anything on the graph to the right of x = 9.
so negative infinity to 9?
yes, looks like it.
that's not a square bracket for the upper bound, right?
Correct. @ashen jasper was
in that case, I don't see anything wrong with the range.
hang on.
..?
your first question's domain looks to be incorrect.
look at the definitions of f.
Ah I see my mistake
pay attention to the first one, and especially notice that it has a lower bound.
Domain: [-8, inf)
yeah. range looks good.
Thank you boss take care
likewise.
!done?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @tidal ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone have a video or a text about 2d shapes that look like 3d when viewed from a specific point in a 3d system?
@grim coyote Has your question been resolved?
like this
@grim coyote Has your question been resolved?
yeah i think so
But of a 2d figure that looks 3d, optical illusion
anyone here play kirka./
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #βhow-to-get-help for instructions).
@grim coyote Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in the last line, y is substituted into y - x. since y is maximixed when x - q = 1, shouldn't y = p + pq be subbed in, rather than only pq being subbed in, as shown in the solution?
You suggest y=p(q+1), but q+1 is already x
Iβm not sure where youβre seeing pq being substituted in
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
i didnt see that
i thought i saw pq/1 rather than px/1
thank you
π
.close
Closed by @hoary hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what exactly is math?
Cause there are so many concepts, but what's their unifying definition?
Mathematics is a field of study that discovers and organizes methods, theories and theorems that are developed and proved for the needs of empirical sciences and mathematics itself. There are many areas of mathematics, which include number theory (the study of numbers), algebra (the study of formulas and related structures), geometry (the study ...
.close
Closed by @distant gulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well first, which two can you eliminate immediately based on tom's conditions?
know your multiples of 3
first and last
but then u still have to multiply the price of each one by 3
not just 3, i think
and then find out if he has enough for the supplement
cost per person doesnt depend on days
the cost for one person for one day is, say for the second one, 10 dollars
i suppose you can eliminate B in the next 5 seconds when you see 1200x3 is already 3600, he cant pay for his supplements
yeah its not just 3 but its mainly 3
so the cost for 1 person for 7 days is?
ah icic
.close
Closed by @balmy quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
left ghg^-1 be k in H
wai
I think double inclusion might be easier here
Let $x \in gH$. Then $\exists h_1 \in H : x=gh$. As $ghg^{-1} \in H$, it follows $xg^{-1} = h'$ for some $h' \in H$. So $x=h'g$. So $gH \subseteq Hg$. Similarly, $Hg \subseteq gH$. Thus we have $gH=Hg$
wai
looks pretty good, just watch your indices
you write h1 and then proceed to write plain h everywhere else
Got it.
Thanks!
Let $x \in g( H \cap K)$. Then $\exists h \in H \cap K: x= gh$. $h \in H \cap K \implies h \in H \land h \in K$. So $gh \in (gH \land gK)$. So $g(H \cap K$. Thus $g(H \cap K) \subseteq gH \cap gK$.
\
Let $y \in gH \cap gK.$ Then $ \exists a \in H : y=ga$. And $y \in gK \implies \exists b \in H : y=gb$. Then $yg^{-1}=a; yg^{-1}=b \implies a=b$.
\
Then $(a=b) \in H \cap K$. So $(ga=gb=y) \in g(H\cap K)$.So $gH \cap gK \subseteq g(H \cap K)$.
\
Thus $gH \cap gK = g(H \cap K)$
wai
Is the formatting and eveyrthing fine?
can be improved
you say $gh \in (gH \land gK)$ which should be $gh \in gH \land gh\in gK$
ExpertEsquieESQUIE
Also some missing parentheses
This first one would be fine if it was $\cap$, since you canβt and sets
BBMaths
@twilit field Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks everyone!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
540
bruh
.solved
Closed by @pearl hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't see where it says you can assume dim W > dim V
@digital basalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo can someone help w me with this question
yah
can we talk in dms if thats fine w u
no
okay find the pattern
What do the circles mean?
pretty sure its the number of times its used in the sequence
Where did this come from
i wouldve done it
uh
i think you start with 2 and then find what numbers 2 points to that adds up to the next number if that makes sense
That cannot be the case cuz you'd run out wayyyy before 1000
Yo yall i need help with understanding fonction polynomes
!occupied, sorry
2 points to 23 but the next term is 21
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #βhow-to-get-help for instructions).
21 - 2 is 19
2 and 19 point to each other
might be the nodes then
what channel do i use for help
Any of the available ones
ok
this is for something
the answer to this question anyways
Hmm could be smth like you move to the one with the most circles and add that
ye
Yeah that tracks actually
Start with 2, move to the one with most circles that 2 points to and add that
im a bit stuck on it after that
So we're looking for a loop
qait maybe
yea
the next one would be 29
which would have the most amount of circles, which is the same as 2, but u js were at 2 sooo
I mean you can follow the nodes 2 19 29 23 but then there isnβt a 48 node
Problem is, this doesn't work for 29 to 23
list all the nodes first
Did u got this from Matrix67?
maybe all the numbers it gives you is one full loop?
so once u know the loop u can figure out the whatever number in the sequence
it loops after the 12th im pretty sure
Itβs also not as if weβre looking at the greatest sum for n step path
not from anyone here
and if i solve it i get smth
Yup, definitely not
Where did you get it from
That breaks down almost immediately
someone
What do you get lol
Thatβs not helpful
its not someone from around here
hmm if we were to convert to usd id say about 200-300?
Thatβs not the point
Like from what source
Oh
idk where he got the question
Yeah no someone isn't just handing out money for a problem that's easy to solve
Or even is reasonable
So what do the circles mean
not money but an item worth around that much
the reason it doesnt work is cause
u cant get the 12th term
ill do the addition
wait
Observe it well and list the nodes
wait ill send
19+29=48
48+23=71
71+48=119
119+10=129
129+44=173
173+17=190
190+5=195
195+57=252
252+73=325
325+17=342
342+2=344 12th term
344+19=363
363+29=392
392+23=415
415+48=463 16th term
@subtle blaze @bold peak
and what i been trying is to
multiply the 12th term with an amount of cycles (which i cannot figure out)
maybe check the terms i gave and compare
cause ik this part of my working is right
from what i know this is something called a prime node transversal or smt
hold on i mightve solved it
ok so if you added all of the differences of the first 12 terms together 1000 times, i think ud get 344000
possibly
mayhaps
i just got 31200 smth
ππ
youre rushing it
i rushed it too and got 18000 smth
π
well is that the answr?? its under 30k
awe
im assuming its between 20k to 30k
lol
probably on the higher end
so 25k+
but below 30k
but estimating isnt gonna get me the answer is it π:
guess every number and eventually ull get it right /j
"is it 25001"
"what about 25002"
LMAOO
ππππ
I dont think its hard
because
u can do it if youve done algebra 2
π
thats what he told me anyways
i didnt understand much in my alg 2 class ππ
relearn i need an answe
π
ππ
shit atp ill find some math professor on discord
i want my items π
lmaoo good luck
have u seen one full cycle
from the start node
the arrows direct u
then u get this
ive even derived a formula
yeah but like
the numbers u gave are diff from the nodes
which seems to fail
or wtvr
u gotta add it
ive been given hints
and im still failing
π
i thought someone here could do this
cause
i think it takes 10 mins
bro needs to email a math professor
No i just need to find someone who can do prime node transversals
whoever made that name cooked
lmao
i would learn it cuz this problem is interesting but i have my own problems to figure out πππ
ππ
find me youtube tututorla
tutorial
π«‘u got this chat
what chat
they all took one look
and abandoned me
π
yea cuz like
what... in the world is that
Guess what
its a prime node transversal
π
whatever the fuck that even means
ywah idk bro
perhaps smth to do w prime numbers
i havent seen it integrated into any steps yet
probably

