#help-49
1 messages · Page 235 of 1
iim supposed to use intermediate value theorem somehow but idk how
@obsidian cliff Has your question been resolved?
First, i would consider f(1/2)
uhh
ok
im going to cry and think about it for a bit ig?
im not sure where im gonna go with that but lets see
also i did not mean to say cry that was a typo i meant just go
sorry if there were any alarms raised
There's two cases.\
- $f(0)=f(1/2)$\
- $f(0)\ne f(1/2)$
SWR
Case 1 is easy. Case 2 is where you want ivp
ok
hmm
hmm
im just trying to articulate my words for ab it
ok now the question is
is there such a choice for L where i can get y = x + 1/2
(days like this i wonder if im good enough for a maths degree lmao)
uhh
maybe some kind of iterated process
That could work, but something simpler:\
let $g :[0, 1/2] \mapsto g(x)=f(x)-f(x+1/2)$
SWR
What can you say about $g$?
SWR
ok
well
im just gonna list off some things first
dk if they're relevant yet
g(0) = - g(1/2)
what are its bounds
Wdym?
ig thats impossible to determine since f doesnt have a defined range
Not relevant
yea ok
if i want to get to the end i need to show that
theres a point where
This is big though. How can you use this?
g(x) = 0
im going to think abt this

so
oh wait
so
g(0) and g(1/2)
have opposite sign
so
there exists $x_0$ with $x_0 \in (0,\frac 12)$ with $g(x_0) = 0 $
lifelong dumbass
Why is this true?
Practice. Experience.
you can apply intermediate value theorem on g(0) and g(1/2) again
pick one of them to be >0, say g(0)
Why can we apply it?
because its a continuous function defined on a closed interval?
Good enough
Everything seems to be in order now
sorry this just feels like i never wouldve gotten it
if it werent for the hint on g(x)
I had a problem like this back when i did topology. It's not something you can easily think of on your own. But once it's in your head, you just hope you remember how to use it when you need to
ok
(dreading uni in like a month)
hopefully it turns ok
im gonna try part b and c
with the following then
Good luck to ya
@obsidian cliff Has your question been resolved?
yea i got to $\frac{n-1}{n}$ distance apart but then having trouble like
lifelong dumbass
covering every point
so to speak
im trying to consider functions $g_k(x) = f(x+\frac{k-1}{n}) - f(x + \frac{k}{n})$
lifelong dumbass
This one is tricky. You can use induction to get you there. But the full path isn't easy to see
As an example, consider n=3. We know there is $x_2\in[0,1/2]$ st $f(x_2)=f(x_2+1/2)$
SWR
Now let $g(x)=f(x+x_2) -f(x+x_2+1/3)$
SWR
The details here are where things get tricky. Anyway, good luck
im gonna close this for now and save the msg thread for another time my brain is already mentally so tired
im sorry
.close
Closed by @obsidian cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sinx+sin2x+sin3x+sin4x+sin5x=5
If x lies in the interval [0,2pi], how many values of x exist?
Through bounding arguments, its clear that all of these terms equal 1
Does a value of x exist which satisfies this equation?
We want all these terms to be simultaneously 1
Feels as if there should be no solutions
you're basically there already
I am unable to prove if none solution exists.
each sin(whatever) must equal 1, so in particular sin(x) = 1
there's only one x in [0, 2pi] that makes this work
And it doesn't work for others..
Done lol
so 0 solutions
but you'll find that e.g. sin(2x) is not 1 for this fixed x
ye
.close
Closed by @pseudo owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, im currently studying sequences for cal 3 and I have a question for the boundedness. is there no specific formula for it? like do i just have to think of 2 numbers that can bound a sequence?
Basically yes, you have to "find it yourself"
ah so there is no way to show it mathematically?
Ofc it depends on the sequence, do you have a particular example you would have help with ?
Oh yes there is
two different things at play here
As in, you have a definition of what is a bounded sequence by in general
uhhh sure, heres one of the problems in my set
- why does your bound work?
- how did you find the bound?
only (1) requires mathematical proof
But when it comes to finding the bound, it's case by case basically
(2) does not have a fixed formula or algo
if im asked to find its monotonicity, im probably good, but i still cant grasp boundedness properly
so i can just give a direct proof for it for any of these two?
Okay, so you want to show this sequence is bounded right ?
One thing you can do is to see if it converges to a limit, in which case it will be bounded
is it increasing or decreasing or neither?
Are you required to find a specific bound ? Or just show it's bounded ?
alr lemme solve quickly gimme a sec
can you send more of the original question so we know what it’s asking?
in the set, just check for the bounded monotone theorem, but im preparing if the exams will have something like "check for bounded above / bounded below"
Okay, I see
if its just the bounded theorem i can just find the limit for the boundedness then just check for monotone then barabimbaraboom
but yk profs usually likes to throw curveballs
Okay so if you want to use bounded monotone thm it's good to practice finding bounds out of the blue indeed
One method that works for non-negative (≥0) sequences is to show they are decreasing
Because if it's decreasing and non-negative, it's bounded between 0 and the first term (cause the sequence never gets bigger since it's decreasing)
ah yeah makes sense
what about for alternating?
is it the same thing?
For alternating sequence you can look at the absolute value
then i can look from there?
Yep
The definition of a bound is a number which is always bigger than the absolute value of your sequence
A positive real number $M>0$ is a bound of $(u_n)_{n \geq 0}$ whenever for all $ n\geq 0$, $|u_n| \leq M$
Twenty
So for alternating sequences, you can basically "forget" about the alternating part and just look at the absolute value
ah alright i actually didnt knew about that
thanks
uhhh can u also do a quick help for physics? im fine with it i just wanna clarify something
Sure
ah nvm my brain is too fried rn to explain the entire problem and process lmao
thanks agian
.close
Closed by @ebon stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! I was trying to draft a lesson plan on multiplying fractions. I was told the answer is incorrect and that I messed up at alike bases. Can anyone explain this to me?
having different denominators is completely fine for multiplying fractions
$\frac a b\cdot \frac c d = \frac{ac}{bd}$
Denascite
you are thinking of addition if I had to guess?
Yes but, why is it bad if i give it the same deno?
$\frac a b + \frac c b = \frac{a+c}{b}$ where this time you need the same denominator
Denascite
you have to multiply top and bottom
not just top
so artificially increasing the denominators just makes every number bigger
for no benefit
I thought i did
writing $\frac25\cdot\frac32=\frac{4}{10}\cdot\frac{15}{10}=\frac{60}{100}=\frac35$ would be fine
Denascite
but really thats just way more complicated than $\frac25\cdot\frac32=\frac{6}{10}=\frac35$
Denascite
Well, i wanted to teach alike bases so that they get in the habit of doing it when needed
But this helps
Thank you!
.close
Closed by @opal hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
$\frac{2}{5}\cdot\frac{3}{2}=\frac{\cancel{2}}{5}\cdot\frac{3}{\cancel{2}}=\frac{3}{5}$
Allen
this feels better
yes but thats something you learn a bit later
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to compute this
3 is a fixed point of this
Hmm?
(14356)=(14)(43)(35)(56)
Would that be right
and (d) would be
(17)(72)(25)(54)(14)(42)(23)(15)(54)(46)(63)(32)
Or you can multiply them first
Or that
but yeah
I have to find this set
${(1324),(1342),(134),(132),(13)}$
wai
(1 3) (2 4) is missing
Maybe I'm mising something, but what does this mean
Do you know what it means for a permutation to be odd or even?
The parity of the number of elements in a transposition
no
Oh right
It can be expressed as the product of an odd/even number of transpositins
wai
no
why
Well, $\alpha^{-1}$ and $\beta^{-1}$ will be odd too
wai
and?
Then Their product would be of odd order, would it not
odd + odd = even
We just add them
yes
and the sum of 4 odd numbers is even
Right I was taking their product for some reason
🤦
Have you proved that the inverse of a permutation maintains the same parity?
if not, look closely at this pic
yes
Got it
Thanks!
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
who is doing alevels...
😭
just send
It's alright
@median apex Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
True or false and why: If a and b are irrational,
then a^b is irrational.
here, i was considering a^b as rational taking it as p/q
and then i have no idea
took log and im stuck
a^b may be rational may be irrational
are you allowed to use the fact that a = sqrt(2)^sqrt(2) is irrational?
for example, if you take $\sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}$, it is irrational
but if you take $(\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}})^\sqrt{2}$, it is rational
Suika
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
which class is this for?
this is an exercise on methods of proving
induction, contradiction and stuff
oh, like an easier example is e^(ln 2) = 2
yeah so for this class you just have to state the contradiction
right
you don't need to prove that ln 2 is irrational or anything
yeah if it's about intro to proofwriting or similar
Closed by @grave kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys, I need some help with combinatorics
The question is
Let f in {h : {1,2,3,4} -> {1,2, . . ., 50} | h is injective} be defined as f(x) = x for 1 <= x <= 4. Find how many functions g in {h : {1,2,3,4} -> {1,2, . . ., 50} | h is injective} satisfy that #(Im(f) \ Im(g)) = 0 or (Im(f) \ Im(g)) = 4
what I have done so far is
knowing that f is injective, then its image its of cardinality 4, #(Im(f)) = 4
same for g, we know #(Im(g)) = 4
so theres two possibilities right, that the set Im(f) and the set Im(g) are disjoint is one possibility
the other possibility is that they are not, in that case specifically Im(f) = Im(g)
yes
so, first of all, the number of injective functions f, such that the image has cardinality 4, in the interval 1 <= x <= 4 is something along the lines of 4!
because say for example
f(1) = 1
f(2) = 2
f(3) = 3
f(4) = 4
like order doesnt matter
f(2) = 2
f(3) = 3
f(4) = 4
f(1) = 1
is still describing the same function
yes
but, after this is when it starts getting messy
when we try to find the number of possible gs
wait a second dude
I got lost how we figured the number of possible fs are 4!
order doesnt matter, so its a combination of picking what ?
the domain of f is {1,2,3,4} but his codomain is {1,2, . . ., 50}
we're interested in the ones whose image is {1,2,3,4}
how many of those there are?
4P4 = 4!
but can you show a little example of fs that work?
f(n)=n
well for instance f(1) = 1, f(2) = 2, f(3) = 4, f(4) = 3
f(n) = (n%4)+1
the problem is dat
?
that doesnt follow f(x) = x
that's an injective function and its image is {1, 2, 3, 4}
right?
what do you mean "follow"?
that is indeed not the function f(x) = x
oh, right
but we needed that f(x) = x
well first I was trying to find the number of f
the number of f that satisfy what, exactly?
then we can get to calculate the number of g
there is only one f
yes, I think so too
just that f in the set of {h : {1,2,3,4} -> {1,2, . . ., 50} | h is injective} and that f(x) = x
what about g?
g with image {1,2,3,4} right?
yes
so either Im(g) = {1,2,3,4} or Im(g) does not intersect {1,2,3,4}
yes
this is where it gets tricky
Not really?
note that g cannot satisfy both conditions
(also, that's not what f is)
(f is just defined as f(1) = x1, f(2) = x2, f(3) = x3, f(4) = x4, where x1 to x4 are distinct whole numbers between 1 and 50 inclusive)
no, f(x) = x
ye
oh shit yh it's defined there
Then this is even simpler
You're then to determine how many injective functions g there are from {1,2,3,4} to {5, 6, ..., 50}
This should be simple to calculate
how
Okay, first, do you understand why, when im(g) = im(f), how there were 4P4 such functions g?
I divided into two possibilities, that Im(g) = {1,2,3,4} or that Im(g) subset {5,...,50}
yh ik I have read the above
ANd you've already done the first case
But do you understand WHY the first case's result is 4P4 = 24 such functions g?
do you feel comfortable with the first case?
kinda, yeah, since we are not restricted by g(x) = x
we can do
g(1) = 1
g(2) = 2
g(3) = 4
g(4) = 3
like I dont understand it completely, but I sort of have some intuition
another example...
g(1)=3
g(2)=2
g(3)=4
g(4)=1
yeah, but how 4p4
(Right, so you didn't understand it?)
yeah
so why claim you had an intuition
We have to pick four numbers for each of g(1), g(2), g(3) and g(4)
Starting at g(1), we have four such choices (in the case that im(g) = im(f))
Once it is picked, then we've only got three choices for g(2)
Then once that is picked, we've got two choices for g(3)
And by this point, we've only got the one remaining choice for g(4)
@tidal turret Can you see how this gives us 24? (there's a multiplication to do)
Yeah, sort of gettt it, is kind abstract though
It really isn't that abstract
It's akin to the question: "How many ways can you seat 4 people on a bench?"
In the first space (e.g. leftmost) on the bench you have 4 choices of person to seat
Then in the second, you have 3 choices left
Then in the third, 2 choices left
Then in the last seat, whoever's remaining
yeah
yeah, so it sort of means 24 seats, but then it gets messy as hell, when Im(g) subset {5,...,50}
46 P 4?
idk why you keep saying "sort of means" here
I mean, 4 ways of sitting the first dude
but why we multiplicate them
why not just sum them?
-# (the verb is "to multiply")
because they are all happenning simultaneously?
there are 4 ways of choosing f(1). for each of these, the number of ways N to pick the remaining three values is the same. so the total is 4N
there is an multiplication principle
in other words there are N ways with f(1)=1, N ways with f(1)=2, N ways with f(1)=3, and N ways with f(1)=4
so 4N, and not 4+N
4N = N + N + N + N
yes
sure, maybe you should change the variable
Can anyone help with 13 and 14
"Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see https://discord.com/channels/268882317391429632/488120190538743810 for instructions)."
-# thanks, me; have a cookie, me
how many ways of arranging ABCD there are?
4 ways of arranging A, 3 ways of arraining B, 2 ways of arranging C , 1 way of arranging D
sort of like that, all them happening simultaneously
it's the same problem
I mean, kinda get it, is tricky tho
yeah
Genuinely slightly concerned what here you're finding "tricky"
How they're the same problems? or the computation itself?
counting is tricky
the counting itself
4 ways of arranging the first letter
3 ways of arranging the second letter
Combinatorics is the mathematics of counting and arranging. Of course, most people know how to count, but combinatorics applies mathematical operations to count quantities that are much too large to be counted the conventional way. Combinatorics is especially useful in computer science. Combinatorics methods can be used to develop estimates abou...
Highly recommend you read through this then
that is so vague 
yeh that''s not more explicatory than what we've said
I mean, this multiplication principle
That's like if we told you 8+3 = 11; and you said "I understand it now because the calculator said 8+3 = 11"
It's honestly not functionally different here
i think this is a little different from the permutations
its the events happening one after the other
it's like saying how many ways can you arrange ABCD on one bench and EFG on a second bench
it's 4! times 3!
yeah I sort of get it now
but as I said, the counting itself, not about the number of ways to seat x people, but like counting in general is tricky
yep
i've had the moment of like "wait why doesn't it work if i calculate it this way?"
and seen others ask the same thing
well multiplication principle and addition principle is useful for simple counting
but then, if Im(g) subseteq {5, ..., 50} theres like 4! x 46P4 ways of this shit happening
you mean 4! for Im(g) = {1,2,3,4} and 46P4 for Im(g) subseteq {5, ..., 50}?
yes
that sort of tracks, but as I said, counting is tricky dude
no argument here
,w 1 + 4! + 46 Pick 4
huh
no
because every f gives another
yeah there is only one f
You said it yourself right here
the issue is that
is the problem mis-stated?
46 pick 4 is happening simultaneously with 4!
Do you understand what "nPr" means?
g is either of the first type or the second type
so the total number of functions g is the sum
yes maybe
right
Im(g) = {1,2,3,4} or Im(g) subset {5,...,50}
Right, so this rule applies
You have to add them
There's no further multiplication at this step
I might have messed up the translation
!xy is what I would say, but the bot is down
haha
Ejercicio 1. Sea $\mathcal{F} = {h : {1,2,3,4} \to {1, 2, \text{ } \dots \text{ } , 50} \text{ } / \text{ } h \text{ es inyectiva }}$. $\$ Definimos en $\mathcal{F}$ la relacion $\mathcal{R}$ como $$f \mathcal{R} g \quad \text{si y solo si} \quad #(\operatorname{Im}(f) \setminus \operatorname{Im}(g)) = 0 \text{ o } 4.$$ a) Analizar si $\mathcal{R}$ es una relacion reflexiva, simetrica, antisimetrica y/o transitiva. $\$ b) Sea $f \in \mathcal{F}$ definida como $f(x) = x$ para $1 \leq x \leq 4$. Calcular cuantas funciones $g \in \mathcal{F}$ satisfacen $f \mathcal{R} g$
Renato
this exercise was b) of this original problem
The translation then is correct
I mean, yes and no
because I proved the relation is symmetric, reflexive, and that is not transitive and not antisymmetric
but assuming that R is symmetric and R is reflexive
And that has to do with anything related to part b, why?
fRf is possible and fRg => gRf
A if and only if B
So any time you see the statement A, you can replace it with B
So you replace "fRg" with the definition there, # (Im(f) \ Im(g)) = 0 or 4
I see no problem, translation-wise
yes but if fRg holds then gRf aswell
In both senses of "translation" (mathematical and linguistic)
why are you bothering yourself with gRf
so #( Im(g) \ Im(f)) = 0 or 4
I think you are right
i.e. the number of functions g that satisfy # (Im(f) \ Im(g)) = 0 or 4
That's literally what you translated it to
Why are you doubting this
this is still the same two possibilities that Im(f) = Im(g) or Im(g) subseteq {5, ..., 50}
the answer doesn't seem right
it is not, but there is a note from the one who corrected it
[the green writing is the marking; it has the correction]
you and she is saying that the events are disjoint, but like the corrector is saying that each permutation gives a different function
Is tricky
no idea why is that even the case
but I think our analysis is kinda correct, like the number of possible fs is 1, and theres two possibilities that Im(g) = {1,2,3,4} or that Im(g) subset {5,...,50}
.close
mother fucking bot
the bot has me trapped as a hostage
anyone seeing this?
.close
.close
.close
.solved
.close
.solved
.close
mother fucking bot dude
.close
our reasoning is correct dude
the answer is just 4! + Permutation(46,4)
that is equivalent to 4! + 4! * combinations(46,4)
the answer that the dude who took this exam gave is wrong because they did 4! + combinations(46,4)
but like, 4! * combinations(46,4) = permutations(46,4)
I was just overcomplicating the problem, and I didnt explained myself correctly but you guys were right from the beginning
and the answer from the guy who corrected is right aswell
both of us were right
because 4! * combinations(46,4) = permutations(46,4)
generally speaking: k! * combinations(n,k) = permutations(n,k)
this was the huge misunderstanding
in this case the one who took this exam didnt recognized that order matters
order matters because we can have f(1) = 5, f(2) = 6, f(3) = 7, f(4) = 8, and have f(1) = 8, f(2) = 7, f(3) = 6, f(4) = 5 and both be different functions
both are valid permutations
anyways I appreciate the help as always
this one was a hardone, because I havent reviewed the basics of combinatorics
but in fact it shouldnt have been too hard
is just that I am behind on the material
I appreciate it
The bot is down
no shit
[This channel is available to anyone needing help now]
Hi
i'm confused on why combinations with repetitions and stars and bars problems have different formulas
I’ll pin this question, consider it a temporary occupation.
tyty
Say I have 5 different types of candies and i want to buy 10 candies
the number of ways to do that is 14 C 4
isnt this the same as saying numbers of ways to choose 10 numbers from 0-4 when repetitions are allowed
i have realized
i might be stupid
k in stars and bars is the types of candies
k in combinations with replacement is 10
they are equivalent
god bless me
.closed
Are you done with the question?
yep
- Dada la funcion
$$f(x,y) = \begin{cases} \frac{x^2\sin(y)}{\frac{1}{3} (x^2 + y^2)} &\text{ si } (x,y) \neq (0,0) \ 0 &\text{ si } (x,y) = (0,0) \end{cases}$$ (a) Hallar todos los $v \in \mathbb{R}^2$ de norma 1 tales que $\pdv{f}{v}$ $(0,0) = 3\$
(b) Decidir si $f(x,y)$ es diferenciable en $(0,0)$.
Renato
I need some help with b)
how do I check if this piecewise is differentiable at (0,0)?
sky you dont need to do this 😭 tho I appreciate you being a manual bot
LOL
,align &f(x,y) = \begin{cases} \frac{x^2\sin(y)}{\frac{1}{3} (x^2 + y^2)} &\text{ si } (x,y) \neq (0,0) \ 0 &\text{ si } (x,y) = (0,0) \end{cases} \ &\lim_{(x,y) \to (x_0, y_0)} \frac{f(x,y) - f(x_0, y_0) - \nabla f(x_0,y_0) \cdot (x - x_0, y - y_0)}{|(x-x_0, y - y_0)|} = 0 \ &\lim_{(x,y) \to (0, 0)} \frac{f(x,y) - f(0, 0) - \nabla f(0,0) \cdot (x - 0, y - 0)}{|(x-0, y - 0)|} = 0 \ &\lim_{(x,y) \to (0, 0)} \frac{f(x,y) - \nabla f(0,0) \cdot (x , y )}{|(x, y )|} = 0 \ &\nabla f(x_0, y_0) = \left(\pdv{f}{x} \ (x_0,y_0), \pdv{f}{v} \ (x_0,y_0)\right) \ &\nabla f(0, 0) = \left(\pdv{f}{x} \ (0,0), \pdv{f}{v} \ (0,0)\right) \ &\pdv{f}{x} \ (x_0,y_0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x_0 + h, y_0) - f(x_0, y_0)}{h} \ &\pdv{f}{x} \ (0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(0 + h, 0) - f(0, 0)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(h, 0)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\frac{h^2 \sin(0)}{\frac{1}{3}(h^2 + 0^2)}}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{3h^2 \sin(0)}{h(h^2 + 0^2)} = 0 \ &\pdv{f}{y} \ (0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(0, 0 + h) - f(0, 0)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(0, h)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\frac{0^2 \sin(h)}{\frac{1}{3}(0^2 + h^2)}}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{3 \cdot 0^2 \sin(h)}{h(0^2 + h^2)} = 0 \ &\nabla f(0, 0) = \left(\pdv{f}{x} \ (0,0), \pdv{f}{v} \ (0,0)\right) = (0,0) \ &\lim_{(x,y) \to (0, 0)} \frac{f(x,y)}{|(x, y )|} = \lim_{(x,y) \to (0, 0)} \frac{f(x,y)}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}} = \lim_{(x,y) \to (0, 0)} \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}} \cdot \frac{x^2\sin(y)}{\frac{1}{3} (x^2 + y^2)} = \lim_{(x,y) \to (0, 0)} \frac{3x^2\sin(y)}{ \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} (x^2 + y^2)} \ &\lim_{r \to 0} \frac{3(r\cos(\theta))^2\sin(r\sin(\theta))}{ \sqrt{r^2} (r^2)} = \lim_{r \to 0} \frac{3r^2\cos^2(\theta)\sin(r\sin(\theta))}{ \sqrt{r^2} (r^2)} = \lim_{r \to 0} \frac{3\cos^2(\theta)\sin(r\sin(\theta))}{r} = \lim_{r \to 0} 3\cos^2(\theta)\sin(\theta) \cdot \frac{\sin(r \sin(\theta))}{r \sin(\theta)} \ &3\cos^2(\theta)\sin(\theta) \neq 0 , \forall \theta
Renato
This one shouldve work
bot is broken it seems
I need some help with this
- Sea $\varphi(x,y) = \left(\frac{1}{\pi} \tan\left(\frac{\pi y}{x}\right), \sqrt{x^2 - 3\cos(\pi y)}, x + 4y\right)$ \\ (a) Calcular $D_{\varphi}(1,-1)$.\\ (b) Sea $f : \mbb{R}^3 \to \mbb{R}$ una funcion diferenciable tal que $f(0,2,-3) = 1$. \\ Sabiendo que: \begin{itemize} \item $\text{La derivada direccional de } f \text{ en la direccion } \\ v = \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, \frac{-1}{\sqrt{2}}, 0\right) \text{ es } \frac{7}{\sqrt{2}}$ \item $\text{La derivada direccional de } f \text{ en la direccion } \\ w = \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{10}}, \frac{3}{\sqrt{10}} , 0 \right) \text{ es } \frac{-13}{\sqrt{10}}$ \item $\pdv{(f \circ \alpha)}{t} \ \left(\frac{\pi}{4}\right) = -3 \text{ para } \alpha(t) = \left(\cos^2(2t), 2\sin(2t), -3\tan(t)\right)$ \end{itemize} Calcular la ecuacion del plano tangente de $f \circ \varphi (1, -1)$
Renato
what's sea
let
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
,w partial derivative with respect to x of (1/pi)*(tan((pi * y)/x))
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
!occupied please claim an available help channel
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
much better
Closed by @urban needle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
I am stuck
stuck where?
Between
between what?
,rcw
Ann
and first term, the ^2 is nowhere to be seen.
the first term should be $2 \times \paren{\frac52}^2$ \ and not $2 \times \frac52$
Ann
finally in the second term i am seeing an extra five pop out of nowhere
$\sqrt{3} \times \frac{5}{2} \neq 5 \sqrt{3} \times \frac{5}{2}$, surely.
Ann
@polar nexus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
My guy do you have a question?
Q 48
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. Could someone please assist me to solve part a) ?
This is what I did, but I am not sure if I answered the question
Hello. I need help please
Thank you. I have to run
.close
Closed by @deep grotto
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I prove this limit is 0
like, I have tried multiple ways
nothing really is solid
what is sen
sine (in some languages)
That works, nice job
btw you also could use sin(w^3) <= 1 instead of sin(w^3) <= w
ye
Oh wait nvm you can’t do that
you need w^3 so that it cancels with the w^2 on the bottom
shit is so nasty
That’s why half of it didn’t matter
any tips for basic calculus?
You’re doing good on basic calculus already
wdym
exam is in a week dude I'm cooked
care to elaborate?
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tidal turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ur so close, this is stuff you've most definitely done before
how would you solve something like
5p = 7
divide by 5?
both sides, yes
yea
exactly the same idea/principle applies here
so id divide by the -2x+4?
something was multiplied to the p you wanted to isolate,
and that's what you divided by
same idea for the y
yes
would I distribute the negative to the 1?
wdym
like when I put the y under the left side theres a negative does it turn the whole 2x+1 into -2x-1?
can you write down the whole equation you're getting
yeah
before the attempt at further simplification
that'd be wrong
okay so theres no negative 1 its just a positive
would still be wrong
oh
okay
do that first, because you're trying to do multiple things at once and ended up treating that as
-(2x+4)
keep the minus in the denominator?
yes
okay
the - in its current state applies only to the 2x
alrighttt
to be safe, chuck whatever you're dividing by in the denominator
worry about what to do after
okay what now then?
what do you have now?
yeah
that wasn't a yes/no question
I dont know would i have to subtract the numerator 1 over then divide the 2?
and ur done
this is it?
yes
Closed by @open dew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this guy
so if A (area) is so small (like in the wire) shouldnt R (resistance) be so large
Because rho (P) is very small
oh...
hm
so rho p in every wire is so small that dividing it by a super small value like A doesnt make it large
ig that makes sense
lets say we increased L ----> 10L
A will decrease to 1/10 A to make Vol constant
R got 10 times larger
or wait no
10/(1/10)
it got a 100x larger
so how is smth that is 100x larger still.... so small? is resistance in real life examples just multiples of 0.0000000000000000001 or smth
depends on the material, but yeah for metals it's pretty f-in small (table from wiki)
yeah i see that makes sense
You don't have .1 mm wires do you
I... dont think i do 😭
wires like copper or aluminum have an extremely low resistivity
even though the wire is thin the p of copper is so incredibly small that it keeps the overall resistance (R) of the wire close to zero
In general for experimental setups the resistance of the wires can pretty much be neglected
I seeee
For larger wires like power lines though, resistance starts to become an issue
ig we didnt get there yet
ty everyone!
.close
Closed by @slate ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yoo
how do you turn a matrix to its identity matrix
What do you mean “its identity matrix”? There’s only n by n one identity matrix for a given n.
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
?
Are you trying to refer to this?
or ...
i think i just didnt word it properly
i need help with part b
i dont understand what 2 is here
2 is 2
2 is an integer. You can multiply an integer by a matrix, which gives you a new matrix
Take A. You just multiply all of the values in the matrix by 2, and you have 2A
i just multiply by the inverse?
or by A then inverse it?
its the parenthesis
the parenthesis make it seem like you need to multiply 2 first
but the question says to use the answer in part a
so if i use the answer in part a then i just mulyiply the result by 2
If m is a scalar and M a matrix.
(mM)^x = m^x M^x
what even is c^-1
whats 2^-1 ?
oh
if you wish to think of it that way
you dont need to think of it that way but it works
of course we have that
[2]^-1 = [2^-1]
so that would be [2] * x = I?
not sure what youre asking
I being the identity matrix
wait nevermind
im confusing stuff
in general how do you find the inverse of any matrix?
other than that formula
plenty,but, what is your questiin here, youre a bit all over the place
i just dont think i understand the concept itself
which concept
inverse of matrices
let M be an nxn matrix
suppose there exists an nxn matrix N with the property that
MN=NM=I
then N = M^{-1}
that's the definition
same as the definition of a multiplicative inverse of a number x
suppose there exists a number y such that xy=yx=1
then y = x^{-1}
or "1/x"
why n x n and not m
it has to be a square matrix or else its non invertible?
interesting so you can only invert square matrices
you can have right-inverses and left-inverses of non-square matrices but they're not really talked aboutr as much because theyre not so useful
or important
so if you have an nxm matrix you cant find an inverse for it correct
if m!=n
right
and this applies for any nxn matrix right
any matrix thats able to be inversed
not all square matrices have inverses
oh
but it is the definition of inverse for all invertible square matrices
for example, look at the formula you have for a 2x2 inverse
if ad-bc = 0 then there is no inverse
division by 0
right
a 2x2 matrix represents a transformation of 2 dimensional space (by matrix vector multiplication). The inverse is just the transformation you need to "invert" the operation done by A
nu nu
if you first apply A and then scale by 2, to invert you must apply A^{-1} and then scale by 1/2 to counteract the 2 (or you can use the formula)
unless the matrix is also 1x1 🧑🔬
But it's 2x2 in this case
I agree it would be nice if everything worked nicely if you did it like that
But sadly it doesn't
so up to the person to prove that (cA)^{-1} = c^{-1}A^{-1}
Do you want them to prove that?
theyre not even here anymore i think
but i dont have a particular desire either way, theyre not MY student, but i think it would be a good exercise
Depends on the operation you're inverting. Think about it: the inverse for addition and multiplication are going to be different.
The "inverse of a matrix" is more specifically the multiplicative inverse
I wrote this above
The inverse A^-1 of a matrix A (more specifically the multiplicative inverse of A) is the matrix such that A A^-1 = I, the identity matrix.
-# Oh sorry I should have inferred multiplicative inverse from the context.
have you never seen the notation ebfore, like
what does multiplicative inverse mean
$9^{-1}$
gfauxpas
?
So imagine we have a number x
yeah but what is that
We multiply it by 2
ok
you didnt learn negative exponents?
The multiplicative inverse is the number that we need to now multiply it by to get back to x
the book says inverses arent exponents
Which is 1/2
this is a number
forgot if its the book or what
The multiplicative inverse of a number x is 1/x
9 is a number
here, did you miss this?
what I wrote in this part?
i just dont understand anything rn its that moment where the frustration is happening
okay
We have a number x
ok
The multiplicative inverse of x is the number we need to multiply x by to get 1
So in other words, xy = 1
y is the multiplicative inverse of x
We can write y = x^-1
For numbers, the multiplicative inverse is just 1/x
So y = x^-1 = 1/x
And we have x (1/x) = 1
Which is correct
Happy with that?
1 is our goal for all inverses?
1 is the multiplicative identity
So yes
An identity is something that leaves the original object unchanged
okay so an inverse of a number is a another number you multiply by the original number to obtain 1
okay
Yes
Well
It's slightly different with matrices
Because you can't do 1/matrix
But the principle is the same
So now we have a matrix M
We want M M^-1 = I
okay
right
ahhh
right
Multiplication is the primary operation you do with matrices
So an "inverse matrix" is the multiplicative inverse
And the identity matrix is the multiplicative identity
The multiplicative bit is just dropped because that's always the case
Yep
M = M * I
Multiplying by 1 leaves x unchanged
best not to use a symbol for matrix multiplication
Matrix multiplying by I leaves M unchanged
right
Greenie I think hes just about ready
yes
What is he ready for?
to prove:
if c is a scalar
and M is an invertible matrix
then
$(cM)^{-1} = c^{-1} M^{-1}$
gfauxpas
non-zero scalar*
i dont understand that
well let's break it down
