#help-49
1 messages · Page 234 of 1
You post your question along with any work you’ve done so we know how far along you are
as I said, I only verified the base case
because when trying to assume n holds and then doing the n + 1 Idk if I can do it
I am . . . stuck
but is fair, if you dont want to help me, is okay, I am not only stuck I am also kind of like disappointed with how things have went this week, I have so much classes daily and I get back to home just to sleep or do homework, sorry it feels like I am demotivated sometimes or non enthusiastic
university life has hit me hard, like killed all my motivation I had from before, topics are covered very fast, too many classes, too many people in my classes, from monday to friday my classes end at 10.30pm and I get home by 11pm
is not like I am venting, is just that I understand you despise me, I also despise myself, things have been rough this past weeks, and as I said, I have had like a complicating time just not giving up, at this point I just want to deenroll and do something else or something, is hard when things dont go well at the start
It's not that we don't want to help, but I'm too tired right now to get into this. My guts tell me that the proof must be similar to that of the binomial theorem, if you want to get into it. You can ignore the weird binomial notation.
Sam
well, combinatorics are covered later in this class, it might still be possible without them
Yes, my point is that the binomial theorem uses methods to prove that might translate to your case, but do feel free to ignore the combinatorics and treat them as some magical coefficient that just works.
And I might be wrong, but it is a good example of proof by induction in general.
Also, do take breaks from working. You can't solve problems efficiently when you're tired.
Do you need help with proving the general formula or the binomial one
Nothing to do with binomial, check the pin for the initial problem.
So just the classic yes?
All I was saying is that I feel, at a first glance, that both proofs are similar. I'm going to sleep, so I won't really be helping more than that.
proving using induction
Okay
Something to do with geometric series formula by induction.
Do you understand how induction works?
yes
We proving this?
well
I mean, that just first look looks way harder than the classic, but still doable
we need to use this to prove that is equivalent to the classic geometric formula
I mean, from this sum we need to derive the geometric formula
I think it should go with something along
Proving that this holds true
And then setting b to some arbitrary value
that works ig
a little bit of help is appreciated
Renato
I mean
There is certainly a way to do it
By multiplying the sum out with the a b
And showing that the terms cancel out
But there has to be a more clever way
what?
cant I divide by (a-b)?
U would go like
Wouldnt help really
dude
Just change the sum into
,, \sum_{i=1}^{n+1} a^{i-1}b^{n+1-i} = \frac{a^{n+1} - b^{n+1}}{a-b} \ \sum_{i=1}^{n+1} a^{i-1}b^{n+1-i} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} a^{i-1}b^{n-i} + \frac{a^{n+1} - b^{n+1}}{a-b} \ \sum_{i=1}^{n+1} a^{i-1}b^{n+1-i} = \frac{a^n - b^n}{a-b}+ \frac{a^{n+1} - b^{n+1}}{a-b}
a cant be equal to b
(ab^n-1 - b^n) + ……. + (a^n - a^n-1* b)
Thats fine
Isnt even induction lol
Eventually showing that all terms cancel out except for -b^n + a^n
we need induction
This proof works just fine as well
But if your strict on induction
This would be
😂
Well
But does this move you somewhere?
I think this is the type of induction where u just add and subtract the same term
I see a slight mistake however
If the sum upper bounds is
n+1
The b should have n+1-i in the exponent
Renato
I suppose ab^k probably helps
wait
,, \sum_{i=1}^{n+1} a^{i-1}b^{n+1-i} = \frac{a^n - b^n}{a-b}+ \frac{a^{n+1} - b^{n+1}}{a-b} \ \sum_{i=1}^{n+1} a^{i-1}b^{n+1-i} = \frac{a^n - b^n+ a^{n+1} - b^{n+1}}{a-b} \ (a-b)\sum_{i=1}^{n+1} a^{i-1}b^{n+1-i} = a^n +a^{n+1} - b^n - b^{n+1} \ (a-b)\sum_{i=1}^{n+1} a^{i-1}b^{n+1-i} = a^n(1 + a) - b^n(1 + b)
Renato
I need to use induction dude
I can write it down on a whiteboard
Okay, so
I was thinking that I could use a term that I add and subtract to make it easier
And something ideal would be
That would leave me with the original a^n + b^n
So I could use the early assumed formula
Substituting the formula back
Thats the smart word for it ye
Okay
So
The a
U put it into the sum formula
As its essentially just a bunch of a^0b^n etc
And u make it
a^1 b^n
a^2 b^n-1
Yes
It is correct I believe
The first and last term are correct
As it stands
The first term being a^0 * b^k
And last one being b^0 * a^k
?
Its right
elaborate
Uh, well
U add one element to the sum
b^k* a^0
Currently the sum goes from a^1 * bk-1 to a^kb^0
it doesnt make any sense
What exactly?
it doesnt make any sense whatsoever
Wdym
It just added one term into the sum
Wait lets get this straight
Is it the first row thats confusing?
Or the second one
Renato
I dont know what to say
Does the last term change with the adjustment?
Just write out a few terms
First and last
your claim I dont think its true
first term is a^0. b^n, last term is a^n . b^0
Good
from the lhs
RHS now
lhs, first term is ab^(n-1) last term is a^nb^0
no
😭
Which side is missing that one please?
the rhs
U sure?
you add a^n . b^0 to the rhs and it becomes lhs
yes
So u say the summation on the right does not include a^n* b^0?
oh, my bad
maths surely are tricky
ye
Ggwp
math is tricky my guy
🤨
u from america?
i appreciate the help
No problem
i lowkey had a good time with this one
the fk?
On the whiteboard
you get taught basic proofs at hs level there?
Uhhhh
We did
Induction is not a standard here generally
Until uni
I am CS tho so I get to use mostly that
No problem, maybe someday again
Closed by @tidal turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the TSA
for this
dyk how to find tsa?
yep i got 1690.84 but idk if that is correct
okay walk thru how you did it
$\frac{2\cdot\pi \cdot 14.65^2}{2} + 2\cdot 14.64 \cdot \pi \cdot 16.2 - 29.3 \cdot 16.2$
Flatus
so people can see it betteer
so is my answer right
i didn't get your answer when i subbed it into my calculator
can you explain
how you got your solution
why did you subtract 29.3x16.2 ?
that's the area of the base it should be included in the tsa
so it's open at the base?
wait it says open on one end
wouldn't that mean
one of the semicircles
is gone
yep its openeed at the base
oh jokes?
idk are you in radians?
wouldn't change a thing?
we're not dealing with trigonometric functions
wait so is my cacultor right or desmos
or do i have to change the settings somehow of my calculator
well if it's open at the base subtracting the base doesn't give you the tsa? you just dont include it in your answer
and instead double whatever you get
im pre sure
it's kinda like, you're subtracting air?
unless you did the working out differently
jessberry
kinda random but js a heads up
discord keeps tagging you as a likely spammer for me
but I wld find the area of the long stuff on top, then the 2 half circles
and then double it
so i just ignore it
omg 😭!
oh me flipping lord
i assumed no open sides and got that answer
would you like me to run you through the solution or guide you to the solution
so i add the rectoangel instead of subtracitg
yes
you wouldn't ever subtract it though
if it was open
wait lemme figue this out
no it just isn't included
yeppers
except in this case
you do need it
Yuh
?
okay just try do it knowing that it's actually closed now
so basically
add the half circles faces
add the rectangle
add the curved face
bc I think you know how to do it
but isnt it asking for half the cyclinde r
essentially, yes
you could do it that method
find total surface area of a cylinder
half it
then add a rectangle
noice
so we caculate the whole cylinder, divided it by two and add the rectangel
but it said one open end
am i tripping
yep
question's trippin
Hi, I'm new here. Anyone want to take the IMO test here?
BUT PLUS IT
no thanks
🙂 really
ye dude. i am doing math
wait what
Let’s see the whole question maybe
Well it’s a “closed”half cylinder
I think it’s a misprint
See how it says “cylinder with” then just stops
I think it’s mesnt to be “cylinder with one open end”
Close half cylinder one open end doesnt make grammatical sense lmao
Rip..
Closed by @vale charm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so instead of multiplying by 5 I multipled by 10, but won't i get the same answer anyway?
hey jess 😭
hm
4+72 isn't 80
ah lol
Closed by @fiery onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800> baldi trolling again
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
I guess that tweet did draw in some attention 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Problem Statement: Given a string s, return the longest palindromic substring in s (without using dynamic programming). how do i start with this one?
i would try choosing each letter/pair of letters as center of palindrome and check whether if you expand it in both sides, would it be palindrome
time complexity here would be O(n^2), right?
also would doing it recursively an easier option? or no?
@proud abyss Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @proud abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to prove this sequence converges
Now calculations hint at the limit being 1
so I first want to prove the seqeunce is positive
Why if I may ask
Well, I thought it would come in handy to prove the seqeunce is monotone decreasing
Anyhow's I have proven it is positive , so I'll move on to that
I'd start by sketching the proof of it being monotone decreasing and then you'll know what will be handy and what will not (in this case, i dont think it'll be very handy)
hmm
I mean $a_{n+1}-a_{n} = \frac{1}{a_{n-1}}-\frac{1}{a_{n}}<0$. Which follows directly from the inductive hypothesis that $a_{n-1}<a_{n}$
wai
Oh, I guess this works
I now have to show the infimum of the sequence is 1$
Let there be a greater lower bound( let' call this $l$, let it be the supremum of (a_n)
wai
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
what level math is this
seems like basic real analysis, so like first (or 2nd) year uni
seems complicated wow
you probably mean infimum btw
if you want a hint, lmk
yea
is it actually that?
,calc 2-1/1.5
Result:
1.3333333333333
,calc 2-1/(4/3)
Result:
1.25
ok, no CE from the first 3 terms, it looks like.
So $\forall \varepsilon \exists a_m : l<a_m < l+\varepsilon$
I think that wai's argument is correct, base case is trivial and the induction step seems to work, given that the sequence is positive
wai
Right so far?
it might work, but it's not the simplest approach
what;s another approach
consider what will happend with the equation a_(n+1) = 2 - 1/an for very large n, given it converges
and specifically, what happens to a_n+1 and an
and what happens in the limit
the difference goes to 0
(an) goes to 0?
Yeah, so in the limit they'll be equal
So you're essentially saying argue for cauchy convergence
if you expand lim |a(n+1) - an| = 0, you should be able to find the limit
u know it converges, dont you? It's monotone and bounded from below (since its positive)
you only need to find the limit
I don't get it?
Well, we know that the sequence (an) converges (it's monotone decreasing and bonuded from below by 0)s
so we only need to find the limit
say the limit is a. What I claim is a = 2 - 1/a (because in the limit, an+1 is the same as an)
sure, but I have to prove that
to rigorously prove it, you can use this
replace an+1 with the defn
and apply few limit theorems
$\abs{a_{n+1}-a_n} =\abs{2-a_n-\frac{1}{a_n}}$
wai
we can even get rid of the absolute value and just write an - an+1, since its decreasing
then take the limit and apply algebraic limit theorem, until everything is in terms of lim(an)
then you have an equation and you can solve for lim(an)
lim 2-a_n-1/a_n = 0
you do
how
the sequence converges, therefore its cauchy
a_n is not yet known to converge is it
that's one way
It's monotone bounded
we know its bounded from below (wai proved its positive) and we know its monotone decreasing
Sure, it's cauchy, but how does that tell us , this is 0
the difference of consecutive terms must tend to 0
I'd have to prove that then
if $\lim a_n = L$ then $\lim (a_n - a_{n+1}) = L - L$
Ann
a_n+1 is the same sequence just shifted, so it must converge too and converge to the same value
lim(an - an+1) = lim(an) - lim(an+1) = L - L
Why is [ a = \lim_{n\to\infty} a_{n+1} = \lim_{n\to\infty} 2-\frac1{a_n} = 2 - \frac1{a} ] not rigorous enough?
thats another way to prove it without refering to it being cauchy
kheer257
(an) = (3/2, 4/3, 5/4, ...)
(an+1) = (4/3, 5/4, ...)
Do you understand why these have the same limit?
yea
okay so we can use this
a = lim an = lim_an+1
thats how the first step is justified
yea, then the limit is 1
yeah, right
the 2nd step is just defn of an+1 and the third one is algebraic limit theorem lim(2 + 1/a) = lim(2) + lim(1 / a) = 2 + 1 / lim(a) = 2 + 1/a
this is how recursive limits are usually computed btw, so this approach is worth remembering (and understanding ofc)
I know this method 😭
I just need extreme rigor and formalism for this course
I see, well, do you now understand how that method is rigorous? Each step can be justified by some limit theorem
alr, great
This is rigorous enough
You can unpack the definitions to make it rigorous
I mean we do still have to do cauchy convergence in class, but should be fine soon
this doesnt need cauchy convergence, it was just the first and simplest justification that came to my mind
lim(an+1) = lim(an) is really all you need (and this is obvious, its the same sequence, just shifted, it can be said it follows from lim(subsequence) = lim(sequence) if you know that theorem)
thanks
yea, I've proven that
One more question
Checking the convergence of this
the limit is 3/2
u sure?
uh, no
I forgot this was recursive
I'll first determine if it's increasing
Well, it is increasing
the question is how to prove it
Let $a_{n}>a_{n-1}$. Then $4+3a_{n}>4+3a_{n-1}$
wai
And $3+2a_{n}>3+2a_{n-1}$
wai
the issue with this is that you'd need 3 + 2an < 3 + 2an-1 in order to put those together
If you think it’s increasing just try to prove a_{n+1} > a_n directly
It’s especially easy when a_{n+1} is defined purely in terms of a_n
you might need to prove a lemma or two with induction in the process, but it's prolly the easiest way
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Find a domain in which (4+3x)/(3+2x) > x, and then prove a_n always lies in that domain
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello!
How do I solve this one?
I tried e^ln
And tried to fish some L hopital
But I got stuck
the obvious first step imo is to put $t := \ln(x)$ so that you get a limit as $t \to 1$
Ann
salut romania
@idle dirge Has your question been resolved?
Salut boss!
@idle dirge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to calculate lim (x->+oo) e^(-x) * ln(x)
$\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{ln(x)}{e^x}$
Good
What do you expect when you solve the limit?
just think e^x grows way faster than x
are you required to show your work, and can you use L’Hopital?
@umbral scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anybody help me find a, b and c ?
what did you try until now
last question, is there any constraint given like, a,b,c is any real number or restricted to integers?
it's an 8th grade problem, so no. and i see now it asks me to find the angles as well
i don't know how i should approach this
Is it asking you to prove the inequality?
no, just: find a, b and c (the sides of the triangle) and the angles of the triangle
if its 8th grade then I am assuming all a,b,c are integers, so in that thought process atm just plug in whole number a,b,c in the second equation and keep the combo which satisfies the triangle inequality and you might see a pattern
i see a pattern but i have no idea how to work it out from under the radical
find the lowest value of each term
you'll be able to work out the lowest value of the expression and see something quite peculiar
ye continue
then b = 3sqrt3, c = 3 remains 2+1+4=<7 true then it's a right triangle
and the angles are 90, 60, 30
^
what would be the lowest value
yeah
it has to be >= 7
but the problem asks us to find values for a,b,c so that it's <=7
which means only one thing can happen
because we were trying to find the lowest value for the expression
please keep explaining, maybe it will click if i see the whole picture
I think you would agree with me that (a-6)^2 >= 0 right?
yes
and from that where do i go
you notice that the problem asks us to find a, b, c so that the expression is <=7
yes and a, b and c cannot be other then 6, 3sqrt3 and 4 because the expression will be bigger then 7
which means the only thing that can happen is if the expression is exactly equal to 7
we found the lowest value which is 7 so a, b and c cannot change the values because the expression will be bigger then 7 and that contradicts
ok i got it
thank you very much
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @safe shale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont know how to do this at all question 8
Yes
But in hexagon no
I can do the triangles,parallelogram
This is the first time I came with a hexagon
isnt a, b, and vector AB just a triangle though
Js consider that AOB is a triangle and find AB
Ok lemme try
Would FA, BD, and AC not just be equal to AB?
Also magnitude of a and b r prolly supposed to be same
That's magnitude,that would be equal
But the vectors differ ig
its a regular hexagon, so all sides are equal though
But only for FA and AB
Is AB
b-a?
BD and AC r not sides
Oh I see
Yes
you're right
Magnitude is equal,yes but direction isnt
so BD is just 2AB and AC is just 2AB aswell
AB is the vector from A to B on the outside
lowercase a and b are their own vectors respectively
Ok
Honestly i dont think this is right
Im sp confused
Cuz the direction of vectors matter as well
I have the answer sheet
Care to share?
Yeah thought so
So far AB is correct
Notice that FABO is a parallelogram
Yess
So u can say that the parallel sides r equal
b-a makes sense
I forgot that direction matters 😞
Yes
Issok
If you draw the tail end of a from the tip of b and then connect tail of b to tip of a
that just gives AB right?
The direction of FA would be from F to A
So FO+OA?
Yes if they were free vector
Yes both in case of magnitude and direction
you can make them free vectors for the sake of finding AB value
right?
That would be the case if O wasnt mentioned
They rnt free here
They r bound
you can always stick them back together after finding the values
OOHH I GOT AC TOO
If u r told that the position of A with respect to O is a
Then how can u say that the position of A with respect to B is also a
Good one!
Closed by @analog torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Number of odd integral solution of
x+y+z=21
so all of x,y,z are odd?
Yes
Any other condition
set x=2a+1 etc
Like postive integers?
Yes
No
All integers
It is
z=21-x-y, pick your favorite odd integers x,y, you get a z
Or find the number of integer solutions to a+b+c = 9
Is it infinite?
Then ig, positive odd integer
wdym, guess
then you could follows what denascite said
do you have a question in front of you
No, I had a test and a question like this appeared
Don't have the exact question now
So u r asking it by memory
Yeah
Was it distinct integers too?
No
Yea than do it by what denascite said
I'll do it now, thanks
Wait I have another question
There are n objects out of which p are alike. How many ways are there to arrange these n objects in a circular combination?
.close
Closed by @tardy bloom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the fact that ""false statement implies true statement" is a true statement" a convention thing, or is there some reason why
the way I like to think about vacuous truths is to use an explicit example and then think about when the statement is a lie
i think it's fine to consider it convention
for example, let our P => Q statement be "if I go outside today, then the world will end tomorrow"
now, when is that statement a lie?
okay well
if I go outside today and the world ends tomorrow, I told the truth when I said this statement, agreed?
and if I go outside today and the world doesn't end tomorrow, I told a lie
but now, if I don't go outside today, and the world doesn't end, I didn't lie!
Yes
for all we know, the world could've ended if I went out
so the statement cannot be false
hence it's true
likewise, if I don't go out today and the world still ends, I also didn't tell a lie
Yeah
so it's not false there either
Hmm 
hence true
I was thinking about it
In context of the fact that
We can't do a proof like:
- Start from statement to be proven
- Develop by deductions
- Arrive at a true statement
Does this relate to the vacuous truth scenario
?
I mean why exactly is this kind of proof not valid
well I mean, you can prove that -1 = 1 doing this
assume -1 = 1 and square both sides to get 1 = 1
the latter is a true statement, so the former must be too by this logic
hello arohi 
Yeah, and this is the case because we can start from a false statement and go to a true statement
Like
Idk how to put into words
but you can prove all sorts of wrong theorems if you allow this, is my point
if this is a valid proof technique for a true statement, then you also get consequences like -1 = 1
That we can go from a statement that is always false
To a statement which is always true
Through deduction
We can't do the thing in the inverse case
We can't go froma true statement to a false one
hm, I'm not sure if I know the answer to that 
if anybody else is watching, feel free to chime in 
@neat sun Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am stumped on where to start with this one, but I think it involves the formula (vector) = manitude(cos(theta))i + magnitude(sin(theta))j
if if m = 4000
CA + CB magnitudes = m?
@junior wedge Has your question been resolved?
they don't add up to m in magnitude
in order to be in equilibrium, all the forces (CA, CB, the weight) should vector sum to 0
@last slate this could be a good exercice for you
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, have a maths exam tommo, looked thru an old test anf saw this, was wondering what the correct way to approach this would be( proper to a gcse/igcse markscheme)
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
ah shit mb my ass read that as 10😭😭
bro why do I have helper role
😭😭
like I didn’t even choose the option to help people
(Well one time I had to help someone because no one was answering but then I figured out the answer was right..)
Lmaooo
yeah nah.. if I have this exam I’m cooked
Im lucky I live in a other country than you
..😭😭😭 shiii
,rotate
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
yuhhh, I mean.. other people can help 🤷
,rotate
bros like: OHHH MYYY PCC—
🙏🙏

Gtg gonna showr rq
simplify from there
Wym decompose?
break apart
Closed by @echo bronze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
indeed
i unintentionally claimed this channel too
type .close
.close
Closed by @hard mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo
these are my teachers notes but shouldnt for positive be (-infinity,5) not 5]?
what am i looking at
yes
?
also for increasing
should it be (-3,2.5) or [-3,2.5]?
im having a stroke reading this
()
interval of increase is a concept
but why
-3 is at 0
and you increase from 0 to 150
man what
youre going infinitly close to the point
because at the point
the roc is 0
at 0 or 150?
for both?
bro what
your just going close to it
and positive and negative is always ( ) ( ) too
assuming the x is real for any real number
and assuming it goes through the x axis
Increasing means $x_1<x_2 \implies f(x_1)<f(x_2)$. Take that as you will.
Civil Service Pigeon
youre including the point 0
like for this example it should be (-infinity,5)
(-infinity,5], not that
because 0 isn't a positive numebr
alright i think i got it
yeah
i think ur teacher just did it wrong
also if the local min and local max is known as those
wouldn't they also be the absolute min/max?
no
this is within a specific part
you only have part of the graph
ok
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @drowsy urchin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do you know what an inflection point is?
Closed by @odd solar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
oh
are thou present?
what if it was
that instead?
i get out to solve that using coefficent comparison
but i dont get how to do if if it is a bigger polynomial
like that
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
i kjnow but our teacher wants us to use that method
idk why
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i used the product rule for absolute value to get that f times sinx is 3, but cant go past it
∣f(x)sinx∣≤∣f(x)∣⋅∣sinx∣<3⋅1=3
do you think there are any more upper bounds you missed?
i dont believe so.. i dont know what to do with the four
this part you already handles well
something about handling the absolute value and the 4 etc
can i do abs value of four plus abs value of −f(x)sinx?
that is the idea, but think about how you would go from |4 - f(x) sinx| to |4| + |-f(x) sinx|, what very common and famous inequality for absolute values will you use?
The one where if you add them, you also add the inequalities?
that is known as the triangle inequality
Ah I see
|a|+|b| >= |a+b|
But then how would I get the collective inequality from that? All I get is
This
well you use the inequality
can you tell me what a and b would be for the terms |4 - f(x) sinx|, |4| + |-f(x) sinx|
a is 4 and B is -f(x) sinx
yup, plugging those in you get your desired inequality
And f(x) sinx after taking abs value
How so?
Let's write what we have so far
Peter
this is obvious right?
Yes
ok, we want to simplify i.e. bound the RHS further, |4| = 4 so no complications there
|f(x) sin x| you bounded before
what was its bound?
^
although the <= sign should really be =
are you following so far?
if something doesn't make sense we can go back to it, just mention it
Where did the negative sign go? Did you get rid of it because it's in the absolute value signs?
Why is it equal to 3?
Question says it's less than 3
correct
I never said it's equal to 3?
Yes
perfect, well by bounding |f(x) sinx| you have a bound for the original expression
I'll write it out more neatly
give me a second
\begin{align*}
|4 - f(x) \sin x| &\leqslant |4| + |-f(x) \sin x| \tag{triangle inequality} \
& = |4| + |f(x) \sin x| \
& = |4| + |f(x) | |\sin x| \
&\leqslant |4| + |f(x)| \cdot 1 \tag{since $|\sin x| \leqslant 1$} \
&< |4| + 3 \tag{given $|f(x)| < 3$} \
&= 7
\end{align*}
Peter
absolutely (no pun intended)
If f(x) is less than 3, why would we use it and not a lower number? Because we are finding the upper bound?
overall considering all inequalities above, we have
|4 - f(x) sin x| <= |4| + |f(x) sin x| <= |4| + |f(x)| < 4 + 3 = 7 or |4 - f(x) sin x| <= 7
f can be as close to 3 as you want
precisely because of that, we are trying to get as close to the upper bound as possible
Ohh, okay thank you!
it sounds contradictory because we are trying to find the lowest UPPER bound
but we need to make sure that the expression |4 - f(x) sin x| at the end of the day is bounded by this value for all x
would 8 still count though?
yes
yes
\
ohhh
to do that we need a case where the function is as big as possible
right that makes sense
it's a bound, but it is not the optimal per say
however the question asks
all bounds
not just the tightest one
@uneven minnow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @uneven minnow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I is the converse
II is the contrapositive
and I'm pretty sure III is equivalent to I
well thats what i thought anyways
but apparently it isn't
i thought for something to be sufficient it means the converse is true
i picked F but the answer was G
"only if" in isolation...
"A only if B" must be read as "if A then B".
i can tell you as somebody whos done, like, Serious Math™ that fucking nobody says just "only if".
you only ever hear it as part of "if and only if"
@jade magnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
