#help-49
1 messages · Page 222 of 1
Yea mb
True
But
Including prim recursion
Will give you more than presburger?
if you work in lambda calculus then I guess you can do it without the usual notion of recursion
yes, in the sense that multiplication is definable
Oh how so? (I'm yet to get to the lambda calculus)
defining naturals as church numerals allows you do simulate a form of iteration
which allows addition
(and multiplication)
Closed by @hallow meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone tell what a,b,c, delta are?
a, b, c, are side lengths, delta is the area
if you're doing comp math, potentially. for school math, I'm not sure
oh wait
i learnt a formula R=delta/S where S = semiperimeter
is that the same thing?
yeah
Closed by @woeful turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this probably isn't the best starting example to understand it
try define like, the indicator function of equality or something simple first
what do you mean by "work"?
I mean what exactly is the function "searching" for
It's iterating over y's that's for sure
yeah
It's finding the first y for which ? is 0?
the first y such that the function is defined for all values below y, and the function is 0 at y
What function
whatever function you're doing unbounded search on
it's like primitive recursion, you need to put some functions in first
Okay so theres this computable function g
Which takes in n+1 args

Ah so it's n args and one y arg
And we iterate over all ys
Checking at what point g becomes 0

what are you stuck on
Wtf is f
like, is it what the resulting function does?
f is the resulting function
that you obtain by applying unbounded search on g
What exactly is the resulting function
f(x1,x2,...,xn) returns the least y such that g(y,x1,x2,...,xn) = 0 and g(z,x1,...,xn) is defined for all z<y
we say that f is defined by unbounded search on g
So g is taking in x1,...,xn,f(x1,...xn)?
no
y is essentially f?
g is an n+1 arg function, yes?
it takes arguments (y, x1,...,xn)
we define a new function f, on n arguments
such that when we pass in f(x1,...,xn), it tells us the smallest y makes g(y,x1,...,xn) = 0
x1,...,xn to f
So that function simply points to the first y which makes g = 0
yes
I'm just not able to fit this into my understanding of semidecidability/RE
example: say $g(y,x) = |x-y|$ (where - is truncated subtraction). Then, unbounded search on $g$ gives a function $f$ such that $f(x) =$ the least y such that $g(y,x) = 0$.
Desync
We are enumerating over ys
if $y=x$, then $g(y,x) = |x-y| = 0$, and if $y$ is any smaller, then $g$ is not $0$, so $f(x) = x$ is the identity function
Desync
it's RE because the result is generally partial
if you want to think about it more in terms of computability, we can just plug in each value of y starting from 0
since g is computable, we can find whatever the result is
and move on to the next y if it's not 0
since we only demand that it's semidecidable, it's ok if we never find a y; it just runs forever
Yeah, I'm asking if this doesn't accidentally end up defining an uncomputable function
Whats the guarantee on that
well, think about how that could happen
we start with a computable function g
and all we're doing is computing it at input 0
(the other inputs are fixed)
Yeah if a minimising input exists well eventually find it..
then computing it at 1, then 2,...
yes, and that's all that's required for RE
Hmmm
if it's not in the set the machine does not have to halt
that's the point of semidecidability
So for a given function g
Oh ok yeah sorry
Dumb question
I'm trying to learn functional programming
I keep getting diverted into things

Thanks tho
I think I kind aget it
Uh hope this is relevant to lambda calculus?.
yes, moreso than turing machines
PR functions/lambda calculus/FP are much more closely related
Yeah..
turing machines are more related to procedural/imperative programming
Yeah
❤️
y is nothiing special ig
It's just one of the n+1 inputs of g
Which we search over
And f, takes in the other n inputs and spits the first value of that remaining input to g,
Whivh makes g0
yup
it takes some inputs x_1,...,x_n and asks "what is the smallest y that makes g(y,x_1,..,x_n?) = 0?"
So in terms of halting problem, the function g could be taking in M and x (machine and input tape) along with some y which is it's expected number of steps in which it halts
And iterate over y
If it never finds such a y it means the machine never halts
And otherwise it finds a y and M halts on x
you need to be a bit clearer with your encoding, and what g is actually doing here
you can indeed construct a halting-semidecider
Let $\varphi_e(x)$ denote the $e$-th partial computable function, and define
\begin{equation*}
h(e,x,y) = \begin{cases}
0 & \text{if the computation of } \varphi_e(x) \text{ halts in exactly } y \text{ steps},\
1 & \text{otherwise}.
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
and define by unbounded search:
\begin{equation*}
H(e,x) = \mu y [ h(e,x,y) = 0 ].
\end{equation*}
then, $H(e,x)$ is the number of steps until the computation halts, and if $\varphi_e(x)$ does not halt, then $H(e,x)$ is undefined.
Desync
you can't just say "put in a turing machine", because they're not really what we're working with; you have to phrase it in terms of PR functions

I suppose all possible partial functions are countable
Since TMs have finite description
So you are attaching number e to this particular partial function
it's more than countable; it's effectively enumerable
you can do this via godel numberings
whats the difference
countable just means there exists a bijection to N
doesn't mean that it's constructive, or if we do know it, that it's computable
effectively enumerable means there's a computable bijection
So this function h is the equivalent partial function of halting problem, takes in equivalent partial function of some turing machine, and its equivalent input, and iterates over ys
for an example of the difference, take the set of godel numbers of turing machines that do not halt on input 0
this is countable, since it is a subset of N, but is not effectively enumerable, because computing the bijection would give a halting oracle
yes
Computing the bijection means listing out all turing machines that do not halt on Input 0
yup
Yeah and all possible inputs is also a enumerable set
Hmm

Uh
NGL still kinda confused but
I'll choose to move on
Thanks a lot for the help

.close
Closed by @hallow meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
oh, actually, you can do this even more directly
.reopen
✅
just add a wrapper around the programs and make it take 0 as an input
so given $\langle P,x\rangle$ (program and input), we can construct a program $Q_{P,x}$ that ignores its input, and simulates $P$ on $x$.
Desync
then run the 0-oracle on Q_P,x
Q_P,x(0) halts if and only if Q_P,x halts for any input, if and only if P,x halts

basically, on any input $y$, $Q_{P,x}$ ignores $y$ and simulates $P$ on $x$ such that if $P$ halts, then it also halts
Desync
since it doesn't depend on the input y, it'll halt on any input if and only if it halts on 0
Ah
and it halts if and only if P halts on x
so we can decide if P halts on x by checking if Q_{P,x} halts on 0
and the mapping from (P,x) to Q_{P,x} is computable, because it's just simulating another machine
kinda not understanding
So now we are dealing with this subset of Turing machines which all take 0 as input and ignore it and then do what the turing machines would do on inout x
ok, we want a halting oracle
so given a program P and input x, we want to decide if P halts on x
given P and x, construct a new program Q_{P,x}
that, when given an input y, ignores y, and simulates P on x; if P halts on x, then Q_{P,x} also halts
Ahh I get it now
So if you have a way to list all turing machines which don't halt on some input, then you include those which ignore that input and simulate all possible turing machines, and don't halt
Giving halting oracle
yes; the point is that, to check any given program and input, we can construct a new program that can be checked by the specific-input-oracle, since it ignores its input
this is a pretty common trick for computability reductions
Hmmm
Where else have I seen this
I guess in some sort of "emptiness is undecidable" result
Anywhoo
Thax a lor
here's another if you want to practice the trick btw
and here's a similar proof
@hallow meteor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
let $a,b$ be positive reals such that
$$\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}\leq 2\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}} \text{ and } (a-b)^2=\frac{4}{25}(ab)^3$$
find the maximum of $a^2+b^2$
ihave<skissue>
xy just in case (ignore what i answered)
ok, so i squared the first inequality, since lhs and rhs are positive then there wouldnt be any problems
$$\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}\leq 2\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}$$
$$\frac{a+b}{ab}\leq 2\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}$$
$$(\frac{a+b}{ab})^2\leq (2\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}})^2$$
$$\frac{(a-b)^2+4ab}{(ab)^2}\leq \frac{8}{5}$$
$$\frac{\frac{4}{5}(ab)^3+4(ab)}{(ab)^2}\leq \frac{8}{5}$$
$$\frac{4}{5}(ab)^3-\frac{8}{5}(ab)^2+4(ab)\leq 0$$
$$\frac{4}{5}(ab)((ab)^2-2(ab)+5)\leq 0$$
ihave<skissue>
x^2-10x+25 is always >=0, so the bottom inequality is <=0 when ab<=0, but we have that a and b are positive reals, which would be impossible for ab<=0
why did i get a contradiction?
squaring should be fine given both sides are positive, and sending stuff over (like the (ab)^2) is fine given positive
$(a-b)^2 = \frac{4}{25}(ab)^3$, you put $\frac{4}{5}$
haseeb
hmm but that would give $(ab)^2 - 10(ab) + 25$ which is nonnegative
haseeb
@viral dagger Has your question been resolved?
oh oops
$$\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}\leq 2\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}$$
$$\frac{a+b}{ab}\leq 2\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}$$
$$(\frac{a+b}{ab})^2\leq (2\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}})^2$$
$$\frac{(a-b)^2+4ab}{(ab)^2}\leq \frac{8}{5}$$
$$\frac{\frac{4}{25}(ab)^3+4(ab)}{(ab)^2}\leq \frac{8}{5}$$
$$\frac{4}{25}(ab)^3-\frac{8}{5}(ab)^2+4(ab)\leq 0$$
$$\frac{4}{25}(ab)((ab)^2-10(ab)+25)\leq 0$$
the last step should also change, because different factoring
unfortunately, the quadratic you get is still positive or zero
ihave<skissue>
that's all i see for now, unfortunately :/
hm by cheating the graph looks like this
lol we pulled up the same thing
so there are definitely solutions, and the max is proabably that cusp
i wonder if you can do this via calc 🤔 or are you supposed to just do manipulations?
i think calc is allowed, just discouraged
also wouldnt you need like laplace multipliers or smth i havent learnt that yet
Let $s=a+b$ and $p=ab$. Then, $$s^2-4p=\frac{4}{25}p^3$$ $$\frac{s}{p} \leq 2 \sqrt{\frac{2}{5}} \implies s^2 \leq \frac{8}{5} p^2$$
Now, consider ||substituting the second inequality into the first equation||
As a check, the sum of the digits of the answer is 3.
is it not $\frac{4}{25}p^3+4p\leq \frac{8}{5}p^2$
ihave<skissue>
oh wait wrong one
$$s^2-4p-\frac{4}{25}p^3\leq -\frac{4}{25}p^3+\frac{8}{5}p^2-4p$$
ihave<skissue>
actually wait what why do you have s here
Civil Service Pigeon
Yes
i just realized ab=5 works here
it really was the 4/5
i swear i did this problem like thrice now and i think every time i used 4/5
alr ty!!
.solved
Closed by @viral dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ok so i understand this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VBQnR2h8XM
Practice this lesson yourself on KhanAcademy.org right now:
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/trigonometry/less-basic-trigonometry/angle-addition-formula-proofs/e/understanding-angle-addition-formulas?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=Trigonometry
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/trigonometry/less-basic-trigonome...
Right but Its hard to kinda imagine whats happening under the hoot
So we start at a point that is on the unit circle
we can form a triangle of x and y components and that x and y are the cos and sin of say alpha
cos a and sin a right
ok so lets image that we want to rotate once more by B
To do that wed want to stack another angle on top of a
and to do that then it means that the hypotenuse of the first triangle would become cos B that would be its base
So like Im kinda trying to visualize how x and y (cos a and sin a) get scaled as its rotated by B
So yea then the height of the triangle B sorta creates a slant
Yes
It looks kinda weird but im trying to visualize how the point cos(a), sin(a) gets scaled
what part of this diagram are you having trouble with
Ok so its kind of weird to imagine how the hypotenuse would be cos B
why
does it mean that we rotated a then we technically have a new starting point on the circle and then rotated b more on it
hold on
let me make it clearer
@fallow scarab
Ok this is the first rotation
So now we can think of cos a and sin a as the starting point
what is the question
Maybe this helps answer why it's cos B?
I said I'm trying to learn how cos a sna sin a scale when rotated by b
that's still not a question
if this diagram didn't answer your question, ask more specifically
Yes it is
Huh??
How do cos a and sin a scale when rotated by b?
That's a question
So is the base of the red triangle cos B?
Yes, because it's a right-angled triangle with hypotenuse 1 and angle B.
these values aren't scaled, they're rotated
(Oh, the labels didn't come through)
so cos a and sin a dont reach the unit circle?
then what is that bigger traingle?
Thats has the same ratio
I know but can you describe what rotation does? Like how when you scale you multiply each point by a magnitude
I meant how it transforms cos a and sin a
so then how would its hypotenuse*** be cos B
you multiply the starting vector (x, y) by the rotation matrix R(theta)
e.g. take (x,y) = (cos(a), sin(a))
Sorry @drowsy ferry I meant hypotenuse
theta is the angle from vector a to vector b in the diagram
So how is that rotation matrix derived
Why is it the way it is
there's also this proof which may be simpler than using matrices
@nocturne harness Has your question been resolved?
This doesnt help me really
again this is not showing why you need to multiply cosb and sin a or cosa and sin b
the steps are given in reverse
Yes I did
so what more do you need?
It all comes down to this
This is probably better
Let me get one i had before
yes i shared a similar picture earlier
Ok so what i dont understand is
yes i agree that one is better
basically how cosa*cosB,sina x cosB wouldnt be touching the unit circle
define "touching"
Nor would its hypotenuse
On the unit circle
well it does if beta = 0
Huh
B = 0 implies cos(B) = 1
Because cosine of 0 degrees is 1 right?
No
do you know the length of the hypotenuse formed by these coordinates
Wdym
We could use phythagoreas to solve for it but if ur talking about it it shows its CosB
Yes
does that answer this then
Ok wait so that proves that
when you take a rotation a
?
i don't know what you're asking. anytime you have a hypotenuse of 1, you can rotate it to align with the x-axis
So what happens if we take rotation a cos and sin output and use that as the starting position
Ok this is what i made
Wait wrong labels
it would technically be cos(a+b)
and sin(a+b)
@fallow scarab
So how do i go further than this
go further to do what?
if you're still trying to prove the sum formulas, this image has all you need.
Help me with this
just follow the diagram you shared earlier
.
remember the hypotenuse of both triangles is 1
I'm saying i dont understand it
so when finding the sides of one triangle you can basically ignore the other
which part of the diagram
Im saying i dont under stand the way its formatted
wdym?
So we are looking for the opposite and adjacent side of the a+b triangle right
In this graph
yes
i assume we're finding sin and cos a+b
Yes im trying to derive how the formulas for them come
which part exactly?
i think we're both confused as to what specifically you don't understand
why don't you try explaining your understanding of the graph from the beginning until the point you get stuck
Ok I dont understand why the blue triangle is scaled by cos B i mean it looks weird to imagine it in a box for me id rather use a unit circle
cause the hypotenuse is cos B
but yes we can use the circle too
do you understand that cos(B) is a number between 0 and 1?
So we split it at where cosB stops
Yes i know but the graph makes it seem like cos B is 1 so it looks weird
i don't see why you think so
Oh i see where that comes from
cos(B) is the side of a right triangle whose hypotenuse is 1 so cos(B) is < 1
specifically the red right triangle
yeah
Ok so im less confused its overall from the fact of how sina * sinb gets subtracted from cosa*cosb i can see it but its weird
How would you desribe that why does sina*sinb affect the x
Like how would you describe that
draw a lilne from the top of the red triangle straight down to the bottom of the rectangle
why are we subtracting sinasinb from cosa cosb
the length of the top side of the rectangle is equal to the bottom side of the rectangle
Let me just use the unit circle its hard to visualize that
So this is the box method on the unit circle
@fallow scarab @nimble leaf
Alright and so
yes?
yes
To get what sin(a+b) would be we need to find those 2 purple lines at the right end
the one on the top and bottom
yes
So we scale our original traingle by cos B
well i guess you can say that, we're using the same box setup
Yes its just more easy for me to see now
Ok so to get the y value of a rotation
and the x value
we scale down our original points by cosB
Then lengths of our new triangle would be
cos(a)cos(B) and sin(a)cos(B)
So we can say the first step is to scale the original values by the cosine of the angle your adding
Ok then
We now know the first portion of sin(a+B) will be sin(a)cos(B)
Ok and they
then*
now you need to find the lengths of that top-right purple trianlge
Yes
Let me draw some right angles
@nimble leaf
Wow that took a bit
Anyways the next step is to figure out that other purple portion so we know that we first scale by cosB which give us the first piece, sin(a)(cos(B) then we find the other piece by understanding that we still have to add on the y from B so instead of only scaling by cosB we also add on a piece that takes the cos(a) and scales it by the sin(B) So basically the y part on A is scaled by the x part on B and the y part on B is scaled by the x part on a then these two Y pieces add up to give you the sum of sin(a+B)
@nimble leaf
Is this right?
Because it seems like the y part on a is scaled by the x part on b and the y part on b is scaled by the x part on a then its added
so in the end you get sin a+b = sina cosb + cosa sinb
yes
its not every day you see the roblox font in a diagram
omg it finally clicked
Multiplying sin(a) by cos(b) basically gives you how much the original Y when rotated stays vertical
So for example
i think you're getting towards intuition that will help a lot when understanding matrix rotaion
you should check out 3b1b's essence of linear algebra series
it's not too advanced and i think you can solidify some of what you're saying mathemetically
OH I SEE IT OH MY GOSH
Wait i can visualize it omg
as cos(B) gets smaller since that is what we first scale by we can see that that first part will get smaller so year sin(a)cos(b) basically gives how much the original y stays vertical when being rotated
and sliding across cos b you can see it
and then cos(a)*sin(b) well that gives how much the x gets affected and turns vertical
so
First scale down the deep blue dot
We get our first value, sin(a)*cos(B)
since we know that the scaled down triangle is a right triangle then its other acute angle is 90-a
which means 90-a+90=180
180-a=180
So the missing angle to add is a
Ok now we know after scaling down by cos(B) that we now move up by cos(a)*sin(B)
@nocturne harness Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have a geometry worksheet i need help with
sure, could you send an image
please show the worksheet!
it's to find the gradient using the first derivative
,rccw
oh sh sorry i didnt know
thanks
it's from the help with the teacher but i actually didn't understand anything
well they applied the power rule for the first one
no
i see
i dont know calculus in general anything at all
i guess we should start with a crash course on how to take derivatives using the power rule
yeah sure
do you know what a derivative is though at least?
no😥
the simple explanation of a derivative is that it is the tangent to the curve at a particular point
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2PpRnFqnqY&t=246s&pp=ygUUZGVyaXZhdGl2ZSBleHBsYWluZWQ%3D. I think it's best you go first learn what a derivative is from this video, to understand it.
Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing—and saving your progress—now: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-calculus-ab/ab-differentiation-1-new/ab-2-1/v/derivative-as-a-concept
Why we study differential calculus. Created by Sal Khan.
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-calculus-ab/ab-derivative...
the curve of a function*
but i agree that you should probably understand what a derivative is first
ok ill watch the video to understand even a little
bruh how does your teacher expect you to do this sheet
bro i skipped half the grade now im Back again and don't understand a thing
yeah that's a problem
i'm not gonna ask how you managed to skip half a grade
but let's work with what we have rn
lowest in my grade fml 😭
anyway take a look at the video first
time to grind
ok i watched the video
im sorry but no i didnt understand anything
oh dear 😅
do you know the formula?
nothing at all, the only thing in maths i understand is adding subtracting and dividing
hm.
What about stuff like pre-calculus
nope
algebra and geometry stuff
do you at least understand algebra?
you shouldn't really be doing calculus then
i used to but forgot everything
dont really have a choice it's my school work and i have to take an exam like next year
It is best you go visit back to those basics of algebra, geometry and trigonmetry before you do calculus
nope i quit everything for some time and came back
You're going to struggle a lot though
and you jumped to calculus without the basics?
i'm surprised they let you jump grades then
I know I know
because you seem to need a crash course in algebra
i didnt the teachers dont know that i have 0 knowledge of this stuff
did you tell them?
yeah but they dont really take it seriouslu
actually, do they not make you take some sort of assessment test when coming back
nope just jumped straight into calculus without any idea of how i can do it
this is... not good honestly.
to understand what a derivative is, you need to know what limits are
and to understand what limits are, you might wanna understand what functions are
well, whats done is done, but since you got time in hand rn, you should focus on learning algebra/pre-calc stuff for now before starting these exercises
and to understand what functions are, that's algebra
so you'll need to quickly brush up on algebra
learned algebra in like 6th grade but forgot every single thing
i have to have this worksheet done by this week
yea you might wanna revise that then
if you want to learn calculus you need to at least do: (they are involved in calculus)
- algebra
- functions
- coordinate geometry
- indicies and logarithms
- sequences and series (probably)
- trigonometry (probably)
- limits
probably some other stuff
i don't even know what the power rule is😭🙏🏻
it's the simplest rule of taking derivatives
and I assume you also don't know what exponent rules are as well?
your safe to assume i dont know anything because i don't
$\frac{d}{dx}x^n=nx^{n-1}$
ImOakley
sorry OP, but this... might be a lot of trouble if you try to tackle it right now
no offense to you meant, but you really ought to quickly brush up on algebra and ask if you have questions
but again you first need to do the other stuff
https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves
you can refer to this site for open-source texts
i mean i think i know how to find dy/ dx
if you do and you insist on trying without the basics, do question 8
i think that's the simplest of the remaining 3
there's only one term
How's that possible??
a friend explained a bit to me
if you don't understand that... yeah, please start from the basics
dont even know the times table..
That's really serious!!
like how to multiply and divide?
yeah definitely go back
mind you im in grade 10
maths is a ladder you need to understand one thing in order to understand the next
i know how to divide and maybe do long divison
what about multiplication though
And you don't know the times table??
how do you know division but not multiplication
wait i forgot what that is
.....
3x2=6
i use my fingers i dont know it at the top of my head
oh dear.
You can't do anything then...
fr🙏🏻
oh so you can multiply, i guess? you just don't know the name
ok one more question
ok sure
have you heard of and used negative numbers?
what
oh.
numbers can go below zero
Is english your native language?
😭🙏🏻
There might be a language barrier maybe
nope maybe that's why i didnt understand the derivative explanation video
i see
negative numbers arent that bad, if you had a car with a negative speed like -10 it just means its going backwards
oh yeah that
so have you heard of them? have you ever used them in math?
but question 8 involves a negative...
ok, since you said you did question 8
could you please show your working?
if youre worried about not completing work in the required time you can just tell people about this
i did tell my teacher but im too embarrassed to say i dont understand anything at all
and you want to get stuck in this cycle of torture where you get tossed increasingly difficult stuff?
You did say your teacher didn't take you seriously
i mean i know people who spent ages on simple 3 digit addition problems even though they had been doing maths for years
,rccw
it should be -6x^2 for dy/dx
and then you'd substitute x = -2
wait what
yeah, that's how derivatives work
you multiply the equation by the exponent and then reduce the exponent by 1
1.) dy/dx = -6 xand a small 2
2.) x= -2?
A small 2??
small 2 = to the power of 2
the small 2 just means raised to the power of 2
Don't you even know what exponent means? 
...yeah😥
oh, dear. oh my yellow fox.
he said before he that he didn't know exponent rules
do you know how powers work?
do you know what powers are?
it's like this √?
that's a root
that's a square root
close, thats the opposite
but that's the opposite of what we're looking for
isnt that how Power works
Yeah I remember, but this was the confirmation 
ok, what IS a power?
$x^3=(x)(x)(x)$
ImOakley
is when someone has authority over something or idk
you can think of powers as repeated multiplication
in the mathematical sense
we meant in maths
in mathermeyical sense i don't know..😭
ok
2³ = 2•2•2
This is a power @summer venture
so do you know how multiplication is repeated addition?
oh yeah wait it's 2 but 3 times?
it says 8
Three times as you can clearly see
it is 8
What is 2•2?
4
And 4•2?
There you go
so 2and a small 3 means 8?
yes 2 raised to the power of 3 is 8
Yes.
ok im smart
Small number = EXPONENT
ohhh
I do think this may be some language barrier problem though
And number with an exponent above to the right is a POWER
since you said english isn't your native and you struggle
Maybe, but ...
nono im fluent
hmm ic
either way we're kind of at an impasse atm
yeah true
having you jump straight to derivatives seems like a very long stretch
we'd have to cover god knows how many years of material in one help channel
no it's ok i won't bother you guys
plus it looks like you might have to self-teach it all
Yeah it's like not knowing the whole alphabet and writing a dissertation
atleast now i know what a exponsinet is
Or I guess hire a private tutor
i think right, OP
am i op
Exponent, though
yes OP just means original poster
oh yeas
anyway, hit up that site i gave you, plus khan academy, plus other resources you can find online
ok exponent is the little number at the top
yes i will look into it
then, practice with those resources, and if you have questions about those, ask in this server
i think i'd rather have you scaffold back to calculus
rather than doing this task right now
thank you for your help tho ill just ask my teacher and embarrass myself
you cant be embarrassed by a teacher
if a teacher embarrasses you
i don't think that's a teacher worthy of being called one
source: i'm a teacher
anyway
a teacher is literally paid to help you
see what you can do about it
you need scaffolding and assistance
no shame in signalling for help
i think the first thing i need to do is learn the times table
is that like 2x6 and stuff like that
yes
i need to count with my fingers
maybe i think
i don't care what you use
if you are able to multiply two numbers, and you understand the concept of multiplication
imo, the multiplication table is the least of your worries right now
i dont even know the full 2 times table
you don't really need to though
if you are allowed a calculator then definitely prioritise algebra and stuff
oh yes i can use calculator
right now, i advise you to learn the following
ok
fractions, decimals, exponents, radicals (including how to work with them, and their laws/rules)
if you already know these, you can go to algebra. if not, you might wanna master these first.
i think i did a bit of fractions and decimals can you give an example
3/5?
then, what is 2/5 + 1/6?
17/30
8/9
4/3 divided by 2/3?
2
yeah i remember fractions actually
but exponents - that one you need to work on
exponents are just the small number on top of X or any number?
to the top right, but yes
this channel is about to cover an entire high school maths curriculum
world record
wait didnt we start with a derivative problem
and now op says he struggles with arithmetic? or sth?
we did, but turns out OP skipped ten thousand miles
im dumb
can't say that when you quit for some time
and not really productive to say that right now
time to start the grind sir
i think for the time being, grind your basics
then come back to this later
I'll try my best 🫡
i mean im pretty sure 90% of the world wouldnt be able to add and multiply fractions first try after not doing anything for ages
i'm that 90%
anyway, i think you can close this channel first, then reopen another one if you get stuck anywhere in your grind
no no i did a lot of division and multiplying and fractions before so i kinda remember all of that
ok sure i dont even know where ill get the help ill try
remember the two sites i mentioned?
https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves
and Khan Academy
khan academy?
oh yeah ill check
thank you everyone who tried to help my slow ah
godspeed sir
do remember to close this channel and claim a new one when you have a question
see you around if you have nothing else to ask
.close
.close
Closed by @summer venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
it was fine the first time
id switch axes first because when one function has top and bottom its confusing
actually thats dumb
So if I int with respect to X from O to C I always take the + x axis right ? Like the 2nd quad here?
If let's say curve was not symmetrical is there any way to int such that I wld want it in the 3rd quadrant
the first thing to do is find the points a c and b
Because curve is symmetrical we are able to take bottom area=top area from O to C right but technically when we integrate we are getting the area in 2nd quad not 3rd
I alreadly did it
ok good
Js some conceptual clarifying yea
i think just take a regular integral from C to O, then the area of that top triangle
then one from O to B and subtract the empty triangle
That's not my qn bro 😭
If it were me I’d actually find A first and transform the whole graph such that A lies on the x axis
Like move it all down
Then integrate the bottom line equation in the relevant bounds to find the area under the graph, take the mod of this
Then subtract the right triangle with hypotenuse AB
@dry ore Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dry ore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@visual summit
??
?
Type .close
why bots??
And why did you make him claim a help channel?
U get out of here
I did not
@timber rampart you can type ,iamnot studying in bots to remove the study role
Oh m
Close this these are for math help
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @past jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1.i
Trace back value of T(k+1)=T(k)+k+1=T(k-1)+k+(k-1)+1+1=...
Huh
What's wrong with this
i was trying to do this originally and uh
yeah i struggled
ok im noticing it's a series formula
1+2+...+k=(k+1)(k+2)/2
!noans 
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
(n^2 + n)/2 ?
so it's just (n^2 + n)/2 > 100 which is a quadratic?
Yeah sum from 1 to n is (n+1)(n+2)/2 if iirc
i mean you can test it
(1+1)(1+2)/2
(2)(3)/2
3?
It’s n(n+1)/2
Isn't it n(n+1)/2
why didnt you just check if it worked bruh 💀
I'm rusting
You can prove this via mathematical induction btw
yeah you can
but im not going to rn because i'd like to save time
for the later questions
Yes, but you don’t need to solve the quadratic. Just approximate values of n given the inequality. Even by the problem statement, you can tabulate values of T(n) and find when it’s greater than 100.
that’s good
T(k)=n(n+1)/2+n, no?
How? And also you mean T(n) I’m pretty sure
T(k+1)=T(k)+k+1
=T(k-1)+k+(k-1)+2
=T(k-2)+k+(k-1)+(k-2)+3
.....
=T(1)+[k+(k-1)+....+1]+k
T(k+1)=T(1)+k(k+1)/2+k
im pretty sure there's no +k in the end
it's just (k)(k+1)/2
That’s correct. However previously you wrote a formula for T(k) in terms of n which is completely different
It's a typo lol
Okay then you’re good
+k comes from the k +1’s. He basically backtracked the formula all the way in terms of T(1)
@jade magnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did you draw a picture
If a triangle is inscribed in a circle with one side as diameter, then the angle opposite to the diameter is a right angle
put the points
of origin
and another ones equal to area
oh what
i didnt know this property
this is what my sketch was looking like
u got like any graph with ques
huh?
yeah i named them
put them equal to area
oh u mean t1,t2
and solve using section fromula
yh like dat
ik it but how to use it here
yeah
do it -
bro i cant understand what ur saying 😭
its also u can find zeroes??
hindi m baat kro
h par konsa function ka zeroes alpha,beta?
u can also find the area using thales
what is thales :(
..
first could u confirm that POQ will be a right angle? is it a property of parabola?
that tells you that POQ is right
not a property of parabola, rather a property of circle
yea yeah got it
was just being dumb
ok now that its a right triangle
how to find P,Q?
oh ok m1m2 = -1
i'd try to introduce some variables
that is one condition
and another condition i can get from area in the determinant formula
that should do it right
i mean sure, if you wanna work with coordinates....
working with side lengths might be easier though
you can very very easily get the side lengths
oh yeah right
and then computing the coordinates is easy, though a bit tedious
yeah ur right
sorry im at the end of my solving for the day
so im making mistakes like this
i think ill get it now
thank you!
@last slate thanks bhai
:))
@woeful turret Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I need to prove C (a 2D ring) is an open set, but can't find a suiting radius of the neighborhood for all points inside the region, so I thought of dividing the ring into two rings (A and B), and then proving the points P0 (in A) and P1 (in B)are in C. Is this valid? is there an easier way to prove this?
how would you do it for the interval (2,4)
there are also other options like considering it as an intersection of two open sets
or as the preimage of an open set under a continuous function
@half tangle Has your question been resolved?
This was my first thought too
You can look at the closed disk with radius sqrt(2) and take its complement, and intersect that with the open disk of radius 2
If you wanna do the basis constructoon you could just make the radius of each ball < the min of the two bounds you found
instead of having to do any cases
if you wanted to directly prove that it's open from the definition and find an open ball around any point in the set, you could also look at the ray from the origin through the point, and look at the distance from your point to the edge of the sets
then you can find the radius of the open ball from there and proceed via the triangle-inequality
You mean something like this?
mhm yup
But the problem is that there are 2 distances, you could measure the distance to the inner or outer circumference depending on which one is the smallest
yes, just take the minimum
second inequality to first equality?
