#help-49
1 messages ยท Page 188 of 1
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
โ
note that this is the exact same proof as showing that the subgroups of Z are of the form aZ
can you tell me why its the same proof?
@twilit field
.close
Closed by @runic hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
โ
Because we want to show practically the same thing, everything is generated by adding or in this case multiplying the same element multiple times
yes
even more explicitly, Z is a cyclic group
so its literally an example of this lemma
yes
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
so
there were 4 black, 5 white balls in a bag. If u pick 2 balls randomly..
- whats the probability u will get 2 white.
- whats the probability u get 2 black
- whats the probability u get 1 black and 1 white
Absolutely crucial question: are you picking the balls with replacement or without replacement?
hmm
like the questions 1 , 2 and 3?
oh their complete different questions so with replacement
well, I guess the question implies you're picking them at the same time
okay, that's fine
What have you tried?
i mean like if u get 2 out of the bag at the first question, itll all just reset at 2
okay uhm
i tried like 2/9.. ๐
i mean ... what steps did you try to get the answer?
adding 4+5=9 is good
I don't think your next step makes much sense
Okay so ... what's the probability of getting 1 white ball if you pick just one ball?
it's not. it doesn't help to just divide whatever numbers I put in the question
here's a sanity check: if there were all white balls the probability of picking a white ball would be 1 (or 9/9)
yea
so like there are 9 possible balls you can pick, and 5 of them are white
not that either
so like 0.20%?
the probability should be bigger the more white balls you have, right? because the more you have the more likely you are to find one
yeah
1/5 is not 0.20% by the way
ok
I'm trying to figure out how to explain the intuition of how to work out these probabilities ...
Okay so let me list down all the events that could happen if you picked one ball
Let W_1 be the outcome that you pick the white ball number 1, W_2 the outcome you pick white ball number 2, ect.
Then here's the list of all possible outcomes if you pick just one ball
W_1
W_2
W_3
W_4
W_5
B_1
B_2
B_3
B_4
the total number of outcomes is 9
out of those 9 outcomes, 5 of them are picking a white ball
and black is 4/9
yes
you can also do like: total 9 balls, ways to pick 2 out of 9 balls is 9C2 so 36, you want both of them to be white, there are 5 white balls so the number of ways is 5C2 which is 10, so probability of picking 2 white balls is 10/36
whats C?
this is also true but I kind of assumed the choose function wasn't something ACE_Blade had been introduced to yet
and didn't want to introduce too many new things
im 14
the choose function (C) is notation for the number of ways "choosing" things
So 7C2 is the number of ways of choosing 2 items out of 7 options
ignore it
nope it's got a more complicated formula
you will learn it later
ok
so probability of getting 1 white ball is 5/9
What's the probability of getting a second white ball given that we already got one white ball? (keep in mind the number of balls in the bucket has changed since we took one out already)
almost
4/8?
yes
why
8 total balls, 4 of them white
ohh
because we took out one of the white ones already
because u picked 1 white ball already
yeah mb
okay so the probability of getting two white balls is
P(two white balls) = P(get white ball fist pick)*P(get white ball second pick | got white ball on first pick)
does that formula make sense/seem familar?
yes exactly
oh
there were 4 black, 5 white balls in a bag. If u pick 2 balls randomly..
- whats the probability u will get 2 white.
- whats the probability u get 2 black
- whats the probability u get 1 black and 1 white
so the answer is
wait
5/1
5/18
yes
oh
5/18 is correct yes
second one is the same, just with black balls
in third question you have to consider two scenarios
they are?
18
what
(which is equivalent to what Astar777 got with the choose method. both methods do essentially the same thing in different ways; it counts the number of outcomes that are in the event you care about and you compare that to the total number ouf outcomes0
uh
what is this for
in third question you are picking 1 black and 1 white ball
the procedure is same as the previous questions
2/18
the difference is
the order matters, so
- first white ball then black ball
- first black ball then white ball
you sum these two for final probability
so ... throwing out numbers isn't super helpful. it would be a lot easier to explain if you try to emulate the method we went through before for 1)
5/9
yes, now you have 8 balls left
now you pick 1 black ball
whats the probability of that
4/8>?
.
so you multiply both
yes, so 20/72
btw when it comes to probabilities
P(X happens and Y happens) means you're going to be multiplying
P(X happens or Y happens) means you're going to sum
now
this is for when u first pick white and then pick black
what about when u first pick black and then pick white
both of these are valid scenarios
so you have to consider both
u get the difference
why difference
oh nvm
both of these are independent, either 1st happens or 2nd
so you sum the probabilities of both
20/72 + 20/72
tahts the final probability
so add or multiply
.
multiply is when actions arent independent
so 40/72?
.
yes
like 20/36 = 10/18 = 5/9
thats by using choose function
thats different that what we did above
(I mean, not technically true P(A and B) = P(A)P(B) if A and B are independent. Not to get too in the weeds of it)
I think they just simplified 40/72
ye i did
so its correct
yeah thats correct
?
yep!
so part 2) is just by part 1) just different numbers but same method
okay
welp
yeah right
should've worded it better
yeah I thought you knew what you meant but it could be a bit confusing
I tried to avoid discussion of independence just so we could get through the question in a fairly intuitive way
@oak fable remember this instead of what i said about independence
oke
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @novel lion
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $x$ and $y$ be elements of a group $G$. Assume each of the elements $x$, $y$ and $xy$ have order $2$. Prove that the set $H ={1,x,y,xy}$ is a subgroup of $G$ and that it has order $4$
\textbf{I'm kind of confused at what the question is asking me to do, each element has order $2$ and there are 4 elements, so order 4?}
What a wonderful world !
do not confuse order of an element vs order of a group
We start by showing $H$ is a subgroup. To do so we check for closure, presence of inverses, and presence of the identity
\begin{enumerate}
\item Identity element : 1 is present, there is an identity in the group
\item $x^2=1 \implies x=x^{-1},;y^2=1; (xy)^2=1 \implies xyxy=1 \implies xy=y^{-1}x^{-1}=(xy)^{-1}$\We thus have the presence of inverses in the set
\item closure: \textbf{ how do I do this efficiently}
\end{enumerate}
\textbf{ To prove elements are distinct I was thinking of using uniquness of inverses, but that feels circular}
What a wonderful world !
this is the table I got [
\begin{array}{c|cccc}
H & 1& x & y & xy \
\hline
1 & 1 & x & y & xy \
x & x & 1 & yx & xyx\
y & y & xy & 1 & x\
xy & xy & y & yxy & 1 \
\end{array}
]
I guess I have to deal with xyx and yxy
check the table again
What a wonderful world !
We start by showing $H$ is a subgroup. To do so we check for closure, presence of inverses, and presence of the identity
\begin{enumerate}
\item Identity element : 1 is present, there is an identity in the group
\item $x^2=1 \implies x=x^{-1},;y^2=1; (xy)^2=1 \implies xyxy=1 \implies xy=y^{-1}x^{-1}=(xy)^{-1}$\We thus have the presence of inverses in the set
\item closure: We Prove this in the multiplication table attached below
\end{enumerate}
\begin{array}{c|cccc}
H & 1& x & y & xy \
\hline
1 & 1 & x & y & xy \
x & x & 1 & yx & xyx\
y & y & xy & 1 & x\
xy & xy & y & yxy & 1 \
\end{array}
]
However, $(xyx) = y^{-1}x^{-1}x = y^{-1}=y$
\and $yxy = yy^{-1}x^{-1} = x$
\ $xy=y^{-1}x^{-1} = yx$
\
thus the table is
\begin{array}{c|cccc}
H & 1& x & y & xy \
\hline /[
1 & 1 & x & y & xy \
x & x & 1 & xy & y\
y & y & xy & 1 & x\
xy & xy & y & x& 1 \
\end{array}]
\textbf{ To prove elements are distinct I was thinking of using uniqueness of inverses, but that feels circular}
What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
ignoring the tex you somehow managed to not see the nice thing about multiplication in this group
look at the equality xy = y^-1 x^-1 closer again
the inverse is the elment itself
It's abelian
yes
so therefore fuck all annoying stuff afterwards
and finally, what happens if for example x=y ?
I love Cayley tables
The group ends up having 2 elemets
hmm
the elements are distinct?
why are they distinct
you are only given that x,y,xy have order 2
the question said nothing about the elements being distinct
you have to show that
yes
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
- Let ( T ) and ( H ) be the subspaces of ( \mathbb{R}^4 ):
[
T = {x \in \mathbb{R}^4 \mid 2x_1 - x_2 + x_3 = 0; x_1 - 2x_4 = 0}
]
[
H = {x \in \mathbb{R}^4 \mid x_1 - 2x_2 + 2x_3 - x_4 = 0}
]
Find, if it exists, a subspace ( S \subset \mathbb{R}^4 ) such that ( S \oplus (T^\perp \cap H) = H ).
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
I'm learning Spanish, though an english math discord group!
are u from america?
so what did you try?
no, from HK, not important at all.
Go back to the question, though
status 1 I think
did you try and compute the subspaces that are mentioned but not explicitely computed?
for starters
you mean find a basis
(although there is an easy way to find a suitable S very fast)
why not
how? hints not spoilers
do you know about the property $(A\oplus B) \cap C = (A\cap C) \oplus (B\cap C)$?
rafilou is not not born in 2003
Conceptually, S will be whatever space was removed from H by the intersection operation. There should be such an S. And if we look at the dimensions of each space involved we see that it's probably 2 dimensional.
T: 2, Tperp: 4-2 = 2, H: 3, Tperp cap H: 1 or 2, but generally 1. So S is 3-1 = 2.
Hi yes excuse me but what does the + inside a circle symbol represent?
It's the direct sum operation
direct sum, sum of two subspaces with trivial intersection
Could you give an example
If you need an example please open your own help thread
Ok sorry
<(1,0)> (+) <(0,1)> = R2, no?
This is true
i dont know that, I guess I need to find a basis then
how did you figured T is dim 2? 4 unknowns 2 equations?
Exactly
Well, it could be 3 dimensions if the equations are redundant, but it's clear that they are not in this case.
(x4 only appears in one equation)
yeah
but I got lost on how you found that dim Tperp Cap H is generally 2
dim Tperp = 2
dim H = 3
but how is dim Tperp cap H generally 2?
anyways, I still need to do compute the basis of T and H, no?
because idk $(A\oplus B) \cap C = (A\cap C) \oplus (B\cap C)$
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
I would need to prove that in order to use it
My bad, it's generally 1 but can be 2, not the other way around
yes, now its more understandable
Which makes S generally 2 dimensional
what happens if Tperp Cap H is dim 2 tho? Tperp is entirely contained in H
are you saying if dim S is 2, and Tperp is entirely contained in H
S (+) (Tperp n H) = H
dim(S) + dim(Tperp n H) = dim(H)
dim(S) + dim(R^2) = dim(R^3)
ohh, three equations, 4 unknowns, thats why you say S is dim(R)
only if these hyperplane cartesian equations are not redundant
Sorry, let's take a step back. If we have Tperp in H, then S is only 1 dimensional, not 2.
And equal to T cap H
by Tperp in H you mean only one of them is in H or both of the basis vectors of Tperp (entirely contained)
Tperp in H means that Tperp is a subspace of H
Entirely contained
But this is not the common case
ok, yes in that case, dim(Tperp n H) = 2
and thus, dim(S) = 1
ok
the other case is dim(Tperp n H) = 1
In which case we have S = (Tperp n H)perp n H
In which case we have $S = (T^{\perp} \cap H)^{\perp} \cap H$
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
this u mean?
Yup
no idea mate
So we want S to be the part of H not in Tperp n H
We can think of the subspace of R4 independent of Tperp n H, this is (Tperp n H)perp
Then we want the part of this that is in H
(Tperp n H)perp n H
And this is S
Satisfying your requirements by construction
you lost me here, you mean
$(T^{\perp} \cap H) \oplus (T^{\perp} \cap H)^\perp = \mathbb{R}^4$
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
If V is any subspace of R4 then V oplus Vperp = R4
yes
but we dont know the dimension of the intersection between the orthogonal complement of T and H
because it can be 1 or 2
dim(H) = 3
dim(Tperp) = 2
Doesn't matter, the above is true no matter what, it's just simpler in the exceptional case
nah I think I get what you mean
because (Tperp n H)perp is linearly independent to (Tperp n H)
and we need S to be contained in H
S is exactly (Tperp n H)perp n H
but we still dunno the dimension of the intersections
but at least we found S
Doesn't matter, you figure this out as you perform the work
You'll know as soon as you find Tperp n H
I haven't put pen to paper, and unfortunately, I don't think I can right now, I need to go afk soon
,w nullspace{nullspace{{2,-1,1,0},{1,0,0,-2}}}
is ok, I think I am on the right track, I appreciate the help
you dont need pen and paper tho, I noticed from the cartesian equation of the hyperplane, the normal of a plane is the vector that is orthogonal to all the vectors that are living in the plane
but this dimension counting, we did was really helpful for my brain, ngl
(x1,x2,x3,x4) = a(2,-1,1,0) + b(-1,0,0,2)
(x1,x2,x3,x4) = (2a-b, -a, a, 2b)
H = {x1 - 2x2 + 2x3 - x4 = 0}
(2a-b)-2(-a)+2(a)-2b = 0
2a-b+2a+2a-2b = 0
a(2+2+2) + b(-1-2) = 0
6a -3b = 0
6a = 3b
2a = b
a(2,-1,1,0) + b(-1,0,0,2) = (2a-b, -a, a, 2b)
(2a-b, -a, a, 2b) = (2a-2a,-a,a,4a) = a(0,-1,1,4) ==> Tperp n H = <(0,-1,1,4)>
dim(Tperp n H) = 1
(Tperp n H)perp = { -x2 + x3 + 4x4 = 0}
,w nullspace{{1,-2,2,-1},{0,-1,1,4}}
S = <(9,4,0,1),(0,1,1,0)>
I guess we can throw a bunch of orthogonal complements at the problem XD
there was multiple ways to attack this problem
let me verify if my S meets the condition
S = {(9a, 4a+b, b, a) | a,b โฌ R}
H = {x1 - 2x2 + 2x3 - x4 = 0}
9a -2(4a+b) + 2b - a = 0
9a -8a -2b + 2b -a = 0
a(9-8-1) + b(-2+2) = 0
9-8-1 = 0
-2+2 = 0
so yes, S is entirely contained in H
aka $S \subseteq H$
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
Tperp = <(2,-1,1,0),(1,0,0,-2)>
Tperp = {(2a+b,-a,a,-2b) : a,b โฌ R}
H = {x1 - 2x2 + 2x3 - x4 = 0}
2a + b -2(-a) + 2(a) - (-2b) = 0
2a + b + 2a + 2a + 2b = 0
a(2+2+2) + b(1+2) = 0
6a + 3b = 0
6a = -3b
3a = -b
b = -3a
Tperp n H = {(2a-3a,-a,a,-2(-3a)) : a,b โฌ R}
Tperp n H = {(-a,-a,a,6a) : a,b โฌ R}
Tperp n H = <(-1,-1,1,6)>
S = <(9,4,0,1),(0,1,1,0)>
,w rank {{9,4,0,1},{0,1,1,0},{-1,-1,1,6}}
Closed by @tidal turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. I have the function f(x)=3x^2 - 2x + 1. I have to calculate the tangents equation in the point x=2. i already have an answer but i am not sure if i calculated the slope of the line correct.
Show your work
Oh sorry it is 2 but that doesnt change anything i think
It does
idk why i said that
it gives 10 not 31
Yep
thank you very much
Np
Are you allowed to derivate the function ?
It's easier than calculating the limit
you mean with a rule of derivation?
Yep
i am but i didnt think of that
$f'(x)=6x-2$
<rajel />
so thats the same with 3x+4 like what i got earlier?
but how is 6x-2 equal to 3x-4
The other one involves more calculus
They aren't equal
Calculating the limit would give you different values for different x
While derivating give you the expression that works for every x
so 6x-2 works for every x but 3x-4 only works with certain values?
only works with x being 2 , yes
Btw it's 3x+4
Closed by @crude totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What should I do next?๐ฅฒ
Thx
Are you not able to understand what to do after a^2 - ab - b^2 = 0?
@slate berry Has your question been resolved?
Yes
Hmm well does the equation resemble something close to a quadratic in any sense?
I tried but failed ๐
I see
Try to make it into a quadratic
Divide by b^2
You should see a nice quadratic
Got it?
,rotate
you simplified the middle term incorrectly
My bad I was blind ๐ถ
Closed by @slate berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$(A\oplus B) \cap C = (A\cap C) \oplus (B\cap C)$
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
wdym
is it true?
i think so
how?
just treat oplus and intersection as regular set operations
what of you had union instead of oplus
union of subspaces is not closed under addition
i know
so?
i am asking more like if you just had sets
you mean basis extension
artemetra
but its subspaces not sets. wtf
can u do a venn diagram
i can't rn, sorry
i am not well versed in set theory, I wouldn't know
how would I sketch a venn diagram out of this
which one is bigger?
in the case the sum is direct, then the sets are disjoint
the property is not true
but I cant provide an counterexample
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
R^2 A = {(x,0) | x in R}, B = {(0,y) | y in R} and C = {(x,x) | x in R} seems to do the trick
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
what?
the property is fake mate, is not true all the time
A = <(1,0)>
B = <(0,1)>
C = <(1,1)>?
A (+) B = <(1,0)> (+) <(0,1)>
A(+)B = <(1,0),(0,1)>
(A(+)B)โฉC = <(1,1)>
(AโฉC) = {0}
(AโฉB)={0}
whats the direct sum between two zero vectors
<(1,1)> โ {0} (+) {0}
<(1,1)> โ 0
ok, true, C is a line that passes through the origin
Closed by @tidal turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just a meta question for anyone familiar with quantum computing, is it required to have quantum physics understanding
from listening to a few others it doesnt seem like you need more than the basic ideas. like why you can do certain gates or something. but that was just my impression
I'm not doing quantum computing myself
Closed by @merry breach
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this valid/sufficient working for this matrix question please?
I havent checked for mistakes but the working looks good
great ty
could anyone help with this one?
im fully lost
i dont know what to do or check
Try to correlate with cayley Hamilton theorem and cube roots of unity
i have no idea what those are
ive searched up cube roots of unity which talks about complex numbers which is fine, its just it isnt really covered withinb the course matter and ide like to stick within it
so is there a simpler/other way?
Yeah
If you wanna find those values
Manipulate the given equation by multiplying A
And A inverse a bunch of times
No problem i just mentioned those to give a connection of sorts
per matrix rules ifi multiply the left A^2 by say the inverse of A, does that equal A^-1*A^2 = A^-2A - A^-1 I?
I don't understand what you mean can you write it down properly
for example
Yep
and then i assume for the first 2 i just do it with more powers
Yes
Don't assume
Solve it
ye
You can't use fractional indices in matrices
mmm oki
surely it is this?
and if so am i missing any working or justification
lol
But the answer is independent
Of n
Simplify the expression you've obtained further
i theorise its smth to do with the square of A-I always gives a standard value but icant figure it out
Yes precisely
Look at the initial equation
Multiply with A
Now observe
ahah i just keep coming back to a loop
like if i try look at the original equation then it just brings it back to what the A^x value
it is

when n is something
Substitute the value of A^2 from the previous equation
wait sorry which equation theres like too many now
A^3 = A^2 - A
A^2 = A - I
So A^3 = ?
i see
hence this??
You can just write A^3 as - I to make things easier ๐

I'm afraid to bring this to your notice... but we can further simplify the second answer into 1 term
= -A^2?
can it be argued that this is not simpler than I - A or is it just cuz ig you dont have any I value
just A
also thx
No id say more simplified would be less number of terms
Np
yea either way now i can point out both
@south heath Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @south heath
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Closed by @south heath
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! I got this question in exam I am not sure if I got it correct so I wanna check
There is 9 balls labelled 1-9,
Lee take 2 ball at random
She stated the chance the sum of that two ball is even is higher than the chance of the product of that two ball being even
Show that she is incorrect
,rotate
for even * odd you need to consider the possibility of drawing an even then an odd vs. an odd then an even
so it will give you 40/72 and not 20/72
Closed by @sour sierra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Limit x tends to infinity (sinx/x)^(1/x) should I apply
e^1/xlog(sinx/x)
Expansion of sinx
what you wrote works as well, its basically the same thing, but dont expand sin
Then?
L'hopital?
that'd work, or you could try to make it into the form ln(1+u)/u
Yeah but after that you gotta have to take Log or convert into e^ form right?
e^1/xlog(sinx/x)
This already is in e^ form
you can just move the limit into the exponent basically
exp is a pretty nice function, so it works

@molten bay Has your question been resolved?
yes then?
e^1/xln(sinx/x)
How can I convert without expansion of it
1+u?
no idea please explain properly not getting idea of your words
What is lim u tending to 0 of ln(1+u)/u
1/(1+u)
=1@fallen sparrow
Right
Now express the term inside ln to be of the form 1 + u
I have no idea@fallen sparrow
Uhh
ln(1+u)
Since sinx/x tends to 1 as x tends to 0
our limit is infinity+
Okh
<@&268886789983436800>
<@&268886789983436800>
.close
Closed by @molten bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$n^2 = a + b \times n + c \times n \times (n-1)$
rulzer.
where does this come from ?
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
you want the whole problem ?
ok what they want is
to calculate this sum
first we use the e^x sum
which is
$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^{n}}{n!} $
tf
$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^{n}}{n!}$
rulzer.
rulzer.
then we have to use the $n^2 = a + b \times n + c \times n \times (n-1)$
rulzer.
to decompose the n^2 then multiply it by e
then we get the sum but the problem is where they got this $n^2 = a + b \times n + c \times n \times (n-1)$
rulzer.
I donโt think we need to use this to be honest
We can just use clever manipulation
$\frac{n^2}{n!}=\frac{n}{(n-1)!}$
;(
@spark nebula Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$$\int 0 , dx = \int = C$$
$$\int = C \implies \int x^3 , dx = Cx^3 , dx$$
MARETU
can someone disprove this
โซ 0 dx = โซ
but โซ 0 dx = C
so โซ = C
โซ(x^3 dx) = C(x^3 dx)
idk how to show this is wrong
this is nonsense
Closed by @grim sierra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this
im used to having a vector < , > with two coordinates to find distance traveled
this is the formula but its one equation so idk how to do it
i think since the question only says "up and down" that is means 1 dimensional movement
alr so how do i solve that
oh ok
ok so is the thing i did wrong is that i didnt square v(t)
and didnt square root it
$\sqrt{v^2} = |v|$
riemann
|v| is not always equal to v
so i have to do the integral of 0 to 3 of the absolute value of v(t)
does that change these positive then?
or is it just the end result
nope
im confused on how to plug that into a calculator or do it by hand
you'll have to find the zeros of v(t) between t = 0 and t=3
,tex .abs def
riemann
use that to re-write |v(t)|
im confused
i have three x intercepts how do i rewrite it based on that
to the right side here
looks like there's only one x intercept between 0 and 3
|v| = -v if v < 0 etc.
what is v ??
you need to read this more carefully
surely you've seen things like |-3| = 3
is the x the x interecept?
so why is this confusing
what?
?
this is v
plug this v(t) into the definition |v(t)|
|v| = -v if v < 0 and v if v >= 0
this
for the t?
not sure what you're asking
the graph tells you
you're plotting v aren't you?
in here
a function y = f(x) is negative if y is below the x axis
if this is v(t) against t, then v < 0 means v below the t axis
what is confusing about that
everything what
if you understood this, it's identical
i really don't know what you're confused by
the graph of v is below the t axis yes
right
what is your confusion
bro how is the graph below the t axis
the graph of v some parts are below some parts are above
are you looking at just the t=0 to t=3
?
what is "it" in this question
yes that's what's given in the problem
correct the part you circled is below the t axis
i don't understand what you're confused by
so the integration of the parts below the x axis are going to just be positive
?
Okay let me break it down
we have this function
we want to find the absolute value of it
so you said look at the v on the graph from t=0 to t=3
this section right here
so now what we know that from 0-0.53 is negative and the rest 0.53-3 is positive
so how do we rewrite the equation or the integral
you have to rewrite |v| using the definition i gave way up above
plug in your v(t)
the right side
.close
Closed by @steel coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@narrow viper Has your question been resolved?
not sure this is allowed here (๐ค)
<@&268886789983436800>
Yeah, please don't use the server/help channela for this.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that the intersection $K \cap H$ of subgroups of a group $G$ is a subgroup of $H$,
\
Proof:
\
As $K$ and $H$ are both subgroups, it follows that $1$ is in both, and thus in the intersection. We now check for closure, each set is individually closed, thus we only have to check the case wherein the elements are from different sets. Let $x \in K, y \in H$. We then wish to show $x+y \in K \cap H$. To the contrary let $ x+y =z; z \notin K \cap H$. \textbf{ my concern is how do I deal with this is z \notin $K \cup H$}
What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
I was thinking of a proof by contradiction
but if $Z \in U \setminus ( K \cup H)$, I can't really do much, can I
What a wonderful world !
where U is the universal set here
wait, why are you considering x in K and y in H
isn't the goal to show that the intersection is a subgroup?
yea
i think you are confusing this with the sum of vector spaces?
so take two elements that are in their intersection (so they are in both K and H)
right, and then closure follows almost immediately
yea
in fact it's true for arbitrary intersections of subgroups (finitely many, infinitely many, even uncountably many)
by basically the same proof
Thanks!
yw
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could you translate it
yeah, is loading
beep beep boop boop
-
Let (S = \langle (3, 0, -1, 1); (1, 2, -1, 0) \rangle),
[ T = { x \in \mathbb{R}^4 / x_1 + x_2 = 0 } \quad \text{and} \quad H = { x \in \mathbb{R}^4 / x_2 + x_3 + kx_4 = 0 }]
be subspaces in (\mathbb{R}^4).Find, if possible, (k \in \mathbb{R}) and a subspace (W) of (\mathbb{R}^4) such that ((S \cap T) \oplus W = H).
-
Let (H_1 = { x \in \mathbb{R}^4 / x_1 + a x_2 + b x_3 = 0 }),
(H_2 = { x \in \mathbb{R}^4 / 2x_1 - x_2 + x_3 + x_4 = 0 }), and
(S = \langle (1, 0, 1, 4); (4, 2, 0, 3) \rangle) be subspaces in (\mathbb{R}^4).Find the values of (a) and (b), and a subspace (T \subset H_2) such that (S \oplus T = H_1).
renato
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
find the basis of T in order to find the basis and hence dimension of S intersection T, which will help you to deduce possibilities for dimensions of H and W
for 1)?
yes
renato
you follow?
ok, lets do your approach
I found basis of T
I still need to find the dimension of the SnT
to find S intersect T, let any arbitrary element in S be equal to alpha * v1 + beta * v2, where v1 and v2 are in basis of S
we didnt needed to find a basis for T
and then x1+x2 =0
yeah mb
will be cool if we find k first before intersection
S, not H
OK
one moment
this should give you alpha+beta=0
yh so dim is 1
SnT = <(-2,2,0,-1)>
now for H, if k = 0 then dimH is obviously 3
and if k!=0 then dimH is ..
ig still 3?
dim(R) + dim(W) = dim(H)
dim(H) = 3
1 + dim(W) = 3
dim(W) = 2
yes still 3
k does not determine the dimension
so dim W is 2
yh
idk why tho, denascite and rafilou2003 always say k = 0 is still dim 3
like it doesnt determine the dimension, idk why
we could plug k = 0 and check if dim(H) is still 3
yeah u can check it out mathematically as well but to get an intuition,
it will obv
it will just become like T here
we only have one relation
between 4 variables
yeah
yeah lets continue, dim(W) = 2
do you know how to find k?
,, (S \cap T) + W = H \implies \begin{cases} (S \cap T) \subset H \ W \subset H \end{cases}
renato
i am getting the feeling that there is no definite value of k maybe
because for a value K, i will get some basis of H. And i can extend basis of SnT to that basis of H
wtf?
did you read the latex I sent
W should contain the zero vector so if (SnT) + W = H then (SnT) โ H and W โ H
also SnT needs to contain zero vector otherwise is not a subspace
so?
yh this makes sense
it does already
nvm i was cooking some garbage lmao
is okay, this exercises are nasty
if we plug the vector of SnT into cartesian equation of hyperplane of H we get k
H = {x2 + x3 + kx4 = 0}
SnT = <(-2,2,0,-1)>
2 + 0 -k = 0
k = 2
yh makes sense
H = {x2 + x3 + 2x4 = 0}
now we just find W by finding the elements that we need to extend basis of SnT with to get basis of H
that will be one possible W
or just the orthogonal complement can do
either way is fine ig
XD
which one you prefer?
i prefer first one because it highlights that W is not unique
i said W is not unique
"find the elements that we need to extend basis of S with to get basis of H"
H is dim 3
yes so we need 2 elements, which justifies that dim W is 2
also since k = 2, we are guaranteed that SnT lives in H
yes exactly
we need two vectors in H that make a basis dim 3 with SnT
,w nullspace {{0,1,1,k}} where k = 2
H = {x2 + x3 + 2x4 = 0}
no
(0,0,1,0) not in H
