#help-49
1 messages · Page 176 of 1
riemann
okay
so now i have $\frac{162*6^x}{\ln{6}} + C$. is there anything i can do after that?
Krish
i just checked the answer key it says $\frac{27*6^{x+1}}{\ln{6}} + C$, which is the same thing. which would be considered more simplified? or does it matter which one i put as the answer? keep in mind this is practice for an integration bee i am participating in
Krish
It really depends on how you define 'simplified'
If u prefer only x's for exponents, then yours is right
If u prefer all constants to be sucked up by the exponent, then the book one is more simplified
yeah true. what do you think they would ask for in an integration bee?
I'm not sure about what is the standard for mathematics though
or do you think they would care?
because imo theyre the same level of simplification
I don't think they would care. Both of them give the same answer after differentiating again
I too think so
thank you, and thanks to the other ppl for the help
i do have one more that im a little stuck on
$\int_1^2{(x^{x^2+1})(2\ln{x}+1)}dx$
Krish
i tried using integration by parts but how would i take the derivative of x^x^2+1
haha yeah 2xlnx looks a lot better
$x*x^{x^2}$
Krish
Yes
Krish
would it be 2x*x^x^2?
You know how to differentiate x^x²?
not really because theyre both functions of x
im used to doing derivatives of x^2 or 2^x, etc. but x^x is weird
Suika
We want $\frac{dy}{dx}$
Suika
yes
lny = xlnx?
Mb
Suika
Yes
ok cool yeah
Suika
$\frac{1}{y} = \ln{x} + 1 + C$?
Krish
There's the chain rule on lhs
Suika
And there's a trick...
so you just substituted y back in for x^x right?
<@&268886789983436800>
For $x^x$, if the exponent were constant, you would do $x\cdot x^{x-1}$ right?
yeah
Suika
If the base were constant, you would do $x^x\ln{x}$
Suika
i see
so definition of derivative of $x^x = x^x(\ln{x}+1)$
Krish
Yes
Krish
No
$\frac{1}{y} * y' = 2x\ln{x} + \frac{x^2}{x}$?
Krish
therefore $\frac{dy}{dx} = x^{x^2}(2x\ln{x} + x)$
Yes, that's right
Krish
okay im getting it now
Or u can use that little trick there
yeah i was just about to look at that, i didnt open the spoiler because i wanted to do it myself first
If you're confused,
Treat the exponent like a constant, differentiate, treat the base like a constant, differentiate, and then add
thats still a little bit confusing ill start using that once i get more comfortable with it, but for now ill try the long way
Now we've already reached your required answer 😅
now since the derivative of 1 is 0, we can say that $\frac{dy}{dx} (x^{x^2+1}) = x^{x^2+1}(2x\ln{x} + \frac{x^2 + 1}{x})$. is that correct?
Krish
theres your 2xlnx that you like so much lol
I don't think u would need this
This is ur question itself
wdym?
.
thats 2xlnx + x though, not 2lnx + 1
$\int x^{x^2}x(2\ln x+1)dx$
Suika
Suika
Krish
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
so the integral is just $x^{x^2}$ from 1 to 2
Krish
Yes
so 16-1=15
ok that makes so much sense thank you
No problem
.close
Closed by @violet dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let ${u,v}$ be an ordered basis in $\mathsf R^2$. Then it is called right-handed if $u$ can be rotated counterclockwise through an angle $\theta$ ($0<\theta <\pi$) to coincide with $v$. Define the orientation $\operatorname{O}$ of ${u,v}$ to be $$\operatorname{O}\begin{pmatrix}u\ v\end{pmatrix}=\frac{\det\begin{pmatrix}u\ v\end{pmatrix}}{\left |\det\begin{pmatrix}u\ v\end{pmatrix}\right|}.$$
I'm working the following exercise: ${u,v}$ is right-handed if and only if $\operatorname{O}\begin{pmatrix}u\ v\end{pmatrix}=1$. \
I think I've managed to prove the forward direction, using the fact that a rotation counterclockwise by angle $\theta$ is given $\mathsf T_\theta(a,b)=(a\cos\theta-b\sin\theta,a\sin\theta+b\cos\theta)$. I don't know how to proceed with the backward direction. If $u=(a,b)$ and $v=(c,d)$, then we have $ad-bc>0$ since $\operatorname{O}\begin{pmatrix}u\ v\end{pmatrix}=1$. How do I proceed?
psie
backwards direction assuming O(u,v)=1?
indeed
maybe you can do contra and cases? hrm
actually no cases
assume theta over or equal pi
ok, so prove if {u,v} is not right-handed, then O(u,v) equals -1 (since it can only equal 1 or -1). But what does it mean for {u,v} to not be right-handed?
clearly if u,v is a basis for R2 then neither is 0
so both have an angle in a meaningful sense
so it must be that angle(u) - a = angle(v) for some a
you can reformulate this into either (u,v) is righthanded or lefthanded
with ...is chiral the word? maybe mirrored definitions along the domain of the rotation angle
does that make sense?
well, I don't understand what you mean by
you can reformulate this into either (u,v) is righthanded or lefthanded
it must be u can be rotated SOME amount to overlap v
if that amount is between 0 and pi, its righthanded
if its between pi and 2pi its left
ok 
but sorry if I'm silly... where did you use that O(u,v)=1?
you dont, you assume its not 1
right, we are doing the contrapositive
and show its ~(right handed)
we need to show O(u,v)=-1 though, right?
theres some edge case stuff i think
i dont think so
but you could
just use abs defn right
the piecewise one i mean
so you are not proving the contrapositive then? because the contrapositive of O(u,v)=1 implies right-handed is left-handed implies O(u,v)=-1, or?
contrapositive is assume O(u,v)!=1 show (u,v) isnt right handed
the contrapositive of A -> B is not B -> not A?
if you do the edge case and some defns and stuff this is O(u,v) = -1 implies (u,v) is lefthanded
oh wait
did i get mixed up
yes lol
youre right, assume left handed
sorry its been a day
so {u,v} is left-handed if u can be rotated in an angle theta (pi < theta < 2pi) to coincide with v? My book only says that a right-handed coordinate system is when u can be rotated in an angle 0 < theta < pi to coincide with v, and otherwise it is left-handed. So it doesn't give a definition really.
But it makes sense if this is the definition of left-handed.
.close
Closed by @inland patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have this matrix, how do I solve it for V1, V2, V3 from the matrix. Also please tell me generally how to do it, I need to show the calculations. The k’s are the magnitude kilo. If you can’t read something lmk.
by hand??
🙂
I buit the matrix
so you multiply each row of the first matrix with the coloumn of the second matrix and then add it
like $0 = V2 * ( -1/(2.2k) + 1/(2.2k) + 1/(3.9k) - 1/(3.9k))$?
unrushed
i did one of it
i feel like this is a back step from my equations
uhh you have to solve for v1,v2 and v3 so youll have to do this
you want to solve these equations right?
so why make a matrix?
ohh i think i know what you mean
that process would be lengthy tho
That is kinda how the prof taught it that I would not need to solve the matrix, but to just make the matrix. Now I need to solve it to solve for another piece of the puzzle
I'm open to any solutions
youll have to first find the inverse of the first matrix
so lets say the first matrix is A, the one with v1 is V and the last matrix is B
ohh
yeah then just solve the equation from here
it would be faster
my first thought is replace all v1 with 5
set each other equal to each other
then we'll have 2 equations with 2 variables and ten we can solve it
yeahh
but youll have 2 variables
so it wont do much good
cause we'll need 2 equations to solve
my other thought is solve for V3 of the first equation and place it in the second for V3
i started to do that earlier, but got scared of the algebra
yeah
this is better
the fractions are a little scary yeah?
convert them first
like common denominator?
yes
and also remove the decimals by multiplying the numerator and denominator with 100
the numbers are bad lol
what's k?
kilo
where'd you get this from?
ohhh you are doing the third equation
i suggest you do the second one
cause it would be easier
8.58k
find v2 in terms of v3 and plug it in the third equation
i think you think my k are 4's
Aria
over 8.58k
i see
and 8.58 is not equal to zero, thus the numerator has to be 0
now solve this, and derive v2 in terms of v3
you can also derive v3 in terms of v2 but it would make it difficult for us as the third equation has more no. of v3 variables
$V3 = (3.9k(V2-5)+2.2k(V2))/(2.2k)$
unrushed
Aria
im not writing k for now
yes
Aria
ok
90.7335
Aria
just make sure my calculation is correct or not
and multiply by 1000 here
giving
$19305(v3-5)+23265(v3-u) +27495v3-604890=0$
here u is our value of v2
yes
this is so bad ughh
who gives calculations like this:((
anyways put the value of u and solve that too
do you understand the context?
uhh its a physics question no?
i never have seen this much difficult calculations in physics and thus its making me wonder if we are correct
its a circuits class
Aria
VL is the final bit of the puzzle
Do you know the AX=B method for matrix?
i thought solving this would have been easier but now we'll have to use matrix
Do you know how to find inverse of a matrix?
no
This might help.
https://youtu.be/UfwXTMygeVs?si=zR2c5WY0UNmB_682
Visit http://ilectureonline.com for more math and science lectures!
In this video I will find x=? y=? z=? of systems of 3 linear equations using Cramer's rule.
First video in the Matrices series can be seen at:
https://youtu.be/pSgaeGFyLH0
Ok thank you
Ok thank you
But the calculation is still gonna be lengthy
yeah it has some pretty bad calculations
Closed by @fringe cairn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain what they did?
which line
after they expanded the determinant
expanding along R_1 means they took the coefficients of the first row and multiplied them by the sub determinants
the factor, then the homogenous expression of degree 3
yes dude i know how to expand a determinant 😭
then what's your question
after they expanded the determinant
and got 0
what did they do to prove that its equal to the rhs
did you simplify this
its just 0 right
does that answer your question
i dont think u understood
my question
this part
and just because the determinant = 0 how did they prove b+c and c+a are factors?
$a+b$ is a ``factor" of $\Delta$ when $a+b = 0$, then $\Delta = 0$
riemann
just like how $x+1$ is a factor of $f(x) = (x+1)(x+2)$ because $x+1=0$ implies $f(x) = 0$
riemann
oh so they did the samething for b+c and c+a and that also yielded determinant = 0 so thats how they are the factors?
,w det{{r-1,-1,-5},{-2,0,3},{-6,0,6}}
,w det{{r-1,r-2,r-6},{2r-4,2r-6,2r-11},{3r-9,3r-12,3r-18}}
@woeful turret Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @woeful turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
Back at it with this annoying question
Solved it but there has been a dispute. The highlighted part in yellow is where the problem is. My friends are saying it’s 11 - 4.9 and others including me are saying 10 - 4.9
Which is correct? Is it 10 or 11?
11
How sure are you?
Negative 5 to positive 5 is ten
It says there -5.5
Woah
I mean am I missing something or
Even though the curve itself intersects x=5
The whole area includes the rectangle from -5.5 to 5.5
Yeah I said woah cause ive been seeing 5
maybe casue the intersection or wtv
Just wanna get confirmation that this derivative result i got is correct, no need to check anything else
just look at the dn/dt
@woeful badge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey how do i solve this kind of problem
Area of a triangle is
$A = (1/2)ab\sin(C)$
doaby
Closed by @lusty cave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the combination of linear and rotational movement is throwing me off, what's the first step?
you can conserve linear momentum to find his linear velocity and conserve angular momentum to find his angular velocity
really?
I'll try it
It worked
thanks
.close
Closed by @green mesa
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
without graph is there any method?
i havent done this before, but i think intuitively the answer should be 2
because theres 3 parameters. its the points connecting each function that are not differentiable (unless the function happens to smoothly transition to the next one)
My prep-school math teacher always recommended using graphs for questions like these
can i use one thing here is that if i make equal three of these functions
so i got three points
x=1,7/4,-9/4
there can be more than 2 transitions by the way, like consider max(x^2, 1)
oooh i didnt think of that
one of the functions can be put between a single function.. thats kind of annoying
yup
idk how you would solve that rigorously
the best way to do this I think is to just calculate when 2 of the 3 are equal
please show
the easiest way would be to see where the graphs are intersecting
since that's where the function would get a sharp point
yes i was saying same thing
i was right but for the wrong reason lol
ah, I see
lmao
If you wish to do it without making a graph, just equate the equations
9 - 4x = 2x^2 + 3
start with that
then verify with 9 - 4x = 4x + 1 and 2x^2 + 3 = 4x + 1
what happens if one of the intersections doesnt play a role either though
wdym?
something like this
well if one of the function is not intersecting, you can't really get the maximum properly iirc
I mean, y is a function of the maximum of those three equations
if i put them in the max function it just spits out the parabola lol. i guess its obvious in this case but it might not be in other cases
yes, that'd just become y = x^2 + 10
lmao I just realized that I had this question in a test two years ago
so... do I just close this thread or...?
whatever your heart desires
@regal barn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A cabinetmaker uses cherry wood to produce 5 desks each day. Each delivery of one container of wood is $5000, whereas the storage of that material is $10 per day per unit stored, where a unit is the amount of material needed by her to produce 1 desk. How much material should be ordered each time, and how often should the material be delivered, to minimize her average daily cost in the production cycle between deliveries?
I don't know where to begin
gotta create formulas, then find derivative, then minimum
@earnest forge Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @earnest forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
howw
I tried doubling the lengths to get 2 diameters but then I am lost
The answer is A but how
call the radii of the circles r_A, r_B etc
then AB = r_A + r_B
BC = r_B + r_C
and so on
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Consider a trapezoid with diagonals with length 5 and 3. If the length of the line connecting the bisectors of the parallel sides is 2, what is the area of the trapezoid?"
i have no idea what to do..
okay so
ive been stuck on this for a bit
i draw BE parallel to AB
and another line parallel to the line connecting the midpoints at B
and this line bisects DE as well
also ive noticed that BDE and ABCD have the same area
so all thats left is to find the area of BDE
how do i do that?
<@&286206848099549185> ?
@chilly cobalt Has your question been resolved?
@chilly cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

🔺️FEB'
½ • 2 • 3 = ½(x + y)h
Trapezium area
= ½(2x + 2y)h = ½ • 2(x + y)h = (x + y)h
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
!nosols .
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
@cedar mason that guy is OP
here
Oooh
oh it's closed
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
.close
Closed by @cedar mason
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i approach this problem
im guessing i should use the root test but how would that even work with the n^2
what problem lol all you gave is a summation
are we proving it diverges?
can you write out what you need to work out for the root test, without worrying about how that would work
just apply the test as-written without thinking about how to simplify it
conv or div
well when i do the root test
you could use the root test its a fools errand tho
why not check easier requirements firs
honestly not sure how to
whats a fools errand
waste of time
like check nth term, or do a naive comparison first
well it obviously diverges right
yes ofc
i mean i can see it divs
we can take log right
not sure how to
Closed by @gusty flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no problem bro
✅
sure what does it look like
so you get $\lim \qty( \frac{n}{n+1} )^n$
jan Niku
right
this is $\lim \qty(1- \frac{1}{n+1} )^n$
jan Niku
i had to do some approximating from here
this is $\lim \qty(1- \frac{n}{n+1} + \frac{n(n-1)}{2(n+1)^2} - \dots )$
jan Niku
approximately, as long as 1/(n+1) is small
what a weird problem
yes
like $\frac{n(n-1)){(n+1)^2}$ is just 1
jan Niku
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Pretty sure you can't do this when the exponent is variable
so this is actually $\lim _{n \to \infty} \sum \frac{(-1)^m}{m!}$
jan Niku
ahhh yu might be right
i was thinking all this approximation is not needed
its a known limit
im sure of it
Yea just take log(exp(...)) and youll get that I think
yea
yeah weird problem
@gusty flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can I isolate a variable here -3x+4y=2
Use rules of equations
but then I would have y=3x+2/4
Parentheses...
y=(3x+2)/2 ?
4..
/4
this is part of a bigger question btw here is the full question I basically have to get this to y = something and use that to solve and get the factors
Give all the solutions for the nonlinear system.
^ that is the instructions
oh yeah mb
here a hint. it's supposed
4y = (3x + 2)
the parentheses is important
but then I would have y unc I would just have an equation
"unc l"?
unc=uncle
He’s calling you old

It’s the whole point anyways.
tbh i still don't understand
You can just subsitute into the first equation, no?
Yes
but where would I put 4y=(3x+2) if I dont have x or y ?
move the 4
y=(3x+2)/4
Well, isolate y (which you did already), then plug it into the other equation.
to the right side
sorry typo
congrats 🎉
unc I just fucking had that and u told me not to use it ?
!volunteers
Helpers are just people volunteering their time to help you. Be polite and patient.
Just be warned
tbh i don't really understand his point
I was being respectful just a question
I get it, it’s just rubs off as rude
Anyways, yes, you had it right.
because this isn't same as
y = (3x + 2) / 4
ahh ok thanks
ngl now im confused again I have x^2+(3x+2)/4=5
do I multiply by denominator ?
(Second term is squared!)
Yeah.
It ends up being a bit nasty, but not too bad.
Closed by @sweet shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
What's ur question
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
The Gauss Markov assumption of random sampling
Does it imply Cov(Yi,Yj)= 0?
Where Yi, Yj are dependent variable values from the data
nvm idk
,w Gauss Markov assumption of random sampling
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
In statistics, the Gauss–Markov theorem (or simply Gauss theorem for some authors) states that the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator has the lowest sampling variance within the class of linear unbiased estimators, if the errors in the linear regression model are uncorrelated, have equal variances and expectation value of zero. The errors ...
Random sampling assumption states that we are working with a completely random population and only one population
If there's any clarification needed pls tell me
<@&286206848099549185>
It feels like it should be true that if we have a random sample, then it's individual Y terms are uncorrelated
Hlo
Reiterating clearly: The Gauss Markov assumption of random sampling, Does it imply Cov(Yi,Yj)= 0? Where Yi, Yj are dependent variable values from the data.
It feels like it should be true that if we have a random sample, then it's individual Y terms are uncorrelated.
But then that implies autocorrelation by itself. Which seems wrong that one GM assumption would imply the other.
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Huh
.close
Closed by @icy zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Anybody check this solution
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain this to me?
I've watched 6 videos on the subject and tried reading the textbook, but none of them have even come close to telling me wtf this beta thing is, let alone how to find it.
.close
Closed by @twin ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Test
Yep it’s fucking dead
<@&268886789983436800> Don’t know if this is the right ping but the bot is down right now
Sorry if I shouldn’t have pinged
Aa
Closed by @dusty portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Ain't no way bro is meta tester
?!
Me and bonk noticed it
I was just seeing if it was really dead
Bot needs rest too
Nothing bad to this
you dont need to do this much testing to see that the bot is dead
just try a few commands and thats al you need lol
Nah I’m like that
Paranoid
and pinging mods is unnecessary
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is my calculator broken? Here's what I'm looking at
But I keep getting 40.814.....
(actually, my problem uses 2.75 instead of 2.8, but still)
,calc 1/2 * pi * 3^2
Result:
14.137166941154
,calc 4 * 3 / (3 * pi)
Result:
1.2732395447352
oh you didn't use parentheses in your calculator probably
and similarly for the last term with 3pi in the denom
I've tried with and without parentheses.. tried each operation individually instead of all on a single line..
then you're inputting the parentheses incorrectly
follow this
Closed by @raven hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$I = \int_\mathbb{C} d^2z \, \omega(z) P_j(z) \overline{P_k(z)} z$
tobi
can I evaluate this for general orthogonal Polynomials with weight w?
because the z term is kinda annoying and I dont know how to deal with it
found some recursion formula on wikipedia
.close
Closed by @uneven sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
angle a?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
rn u cant do sine rule
wait so then u have b already?
or did u that using sine rule
nice
then use sine rule now
to find A
wait hold on
no use cosine rule again
both works
ah
ok
yeah
so its like
recall how a sin graph works
it goes up to 1 at 90 then goes back down to 0 at 180
correct?
so if ur value u had was like 75
on the other side of the sine graph, 105 would also be a valid value
smth like this
so it honestly depends if the question was asking u to find an acute or obtuse angle
but a better way to bypass that ambiguity is using cosine rule
since cosine goes from 1 to 0 at 90 then 0 to -1 at 180
no overlaps
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yeah we'll continue here
would u agree that sin(75) and sin( 105) would output the same answer
like if y=sinx, it would be the same y value
so thats why our calculator is a bit confused
it gives the value closest to 0 instead of what we want
so imo i'd rather use cosine rule as it removes that confusion
always
cuz angles in a triangle can never get past 180
and from 0 to 180 the cos graph is never symmetrical
np
Closed by @tall lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $p$ be a prime number, $k \in \mathbb{Z}^+$, and $G$ a cyclic group of order $p^k$. Prove that $|\text{Aut}(G)| = p^{k-1}(p-1)$.
Halex
I know $p^{k-1}(p-1) = \phi (p ^k)$ is the number of generators of $G$
Halex
And also, $f \in \text{Aut}(G)$ implies $\langle f(g) \rangle = G$ where $\langle g \rangle = G$
Halex
Do you know what the automorphisms of this group look like?
That's probably the best place to go next
Every element in G is a power of g. The image of g under some automorphism of G is also a generator of G
Is it wrong?
No that's right, that's just a rephrasing of this
You can be a bit more specific though
How so?
As in that's just a property that every automorphism has
What you want to try and do is find all of them
Yup, I want to get a relation that allows me to show they are $p^{k-1}(p-1)$.
Halex
Could you give me a hint please?
Sure
See if you can prove the converse to this
or a converse, I should say
it would not be surjective?
Wdym
for the converse, if we assume < f(g) > ≠ G, then | f (g) | ≠ p^k = | G |
Okay I'm dumb
depression
Nw it's easily done
The contrapositive is just the same statement but written differently (assuming TND at least but let's not go there)
if f an homomorphism by hypothesis?
Yes
Took a while
Let $y \in G$. Since $\langle f(g) \rangle = G$ it follows $( f(g) )^k = y$ for some $k \in \mathbb{Z}^+$, which is the same as $ f(g^k) = y$ since $f$ is an homomorphism. Thus $f$ is surjective
Halex
Assume $f(x) = e$ where $e$ is the identity of $G$. We will show that $\text{Ker}(f) = {e}$. Since $x \in G$, we have that $x = g^m$ for some $m \in \mathbb{Z}^+$. $$f(g^m) = (f(g))^m,$$ so $m = |G| \cdot k$ for some $k$. Hence $$x = g^{|G| k} = (g^{|G|})^k = e^k = e.$$ Thus $\text{Ker}(f) = {e}$.
G is a group, not a homomorphism, so ker(G) doesn't really mean anything
Well done though
my bad
it should be fixed now
You're still talking about ker(G)
G does not have a kernel
Your logic is good though
Halex
So now can you finish the proof of this?
There's no need to prove that f is an automorphism then < f(g) > = G?
Oh sorry I thought you were done with that proof
As in I thought you'd proven that already
Yes you need it
well, this implication is a little bit harder than the previous one
how do I show < f (g) > = G?
I'd do it by contradiction personally
But you don't have to, you can do it directly as well
I thought you had it already because you said so here
it was by intuition haha
By way of contradiction, if $\langle f(g) \rangle \neq G$ this would mean that $f(G) \neq G$ which contradicts the fact that $f$ is surjective?
Halex
Ummm... yes but you haven't actually specified why this means that f(G) =/= G. You just said there's a contradiction and left it as an exercise for the reader haha
Sorry if that sounds mean but I'd probably give half marks
Really focus on the fact that g generates G
I'm a bit confused now
$\bigl\langle f(g)\bigr\rangle$ is the group generated by the element $f(g)$. $f(G):={f(g)\mid g\in G}$ is the setwise image of $G$ under $f$.
They are not the same
a priori
depression
So one not being equal to the whole group doesn't necessarily mean that the other isn't
If that makes sense
Let $a \in G$, it follows $a = g^k$ for some $k$, then $f(a) = f(g^k) = (f(g))^k$.
since $a$ is arbitrary, $f(G) = { (f(g))^k : k \in \mathbb{Z}^+ } = \langle f(g) \rangle$
Halex
since f(G) = G as we get our desired result
Now, how does this help me prove this?
Not sure how to conclude
result 1
$f \in \text{Aut}(G)$ if and only if $ \langle f(g) \rangle = G$ with $ \langle g \rangle = G$?
Halex
Good
That tells you exactly what the automorphisms are and what they look like
You should be able to count them now
For simplicity fix a generator g
I might be missing something, but I do not get the relation with the totient function
It was one of the first things you said
.
Yep, but I didn't say I know why it is the order of |Aut(G)| 😔
Ah okay
That comes from this
There is one automorphism for every generator of G
May I be missing another property of Aut(G)?
That's what that statement means
Because homomorphisms are determined exactly by what they do to the generators of a group
Do you see why that's true?
There are $\phi (p^k)$ generators of $G$
Halex
Yes there are
Halex
Is this wrong?
Okay, I see the point now
What I don't get at all is how we can make the conclusion in a formal proof
If $x = g_1^{a_1}g_2^{a_2}\cdots g_n^{a_n}$, then $f(x) = f(g_1)^{a_1}f(g_2)^{a_2}\cdots f(g_n)^{a_n}$ for any homomorphism f
depression
That's why
if g_1, ...., g_n is a generator set
You've got all the pieces already
You've just proven that the automorphisms are in bijection with the generators of G
This is the bijection
G has $\phi(p^k)$ generators and every generator $g \in G$ determines an automorphism. So $| \text{Aut}(G)$ has $\phi(p^k)$ elements
Halex
I get the point. But is it clear enough? Like how do I write it in a formal proof?
That sounds formal to me
If two sets are in bijection, then by definition they are the same size
I didn't prove it was unique did I?
That's from this
A homomorphism is uniquely determined by what it does to generators
Ok
I didn't know that 🤔
Okay maybe I shouldn't've said it then haha
but for a cyclic group it's pretty clear
Because all elements are of the form g^k
so f(g^k) = f(g)^k
The only thing that matters is what happens to g
I am a bit confused
Do you know what a homomorphism is?
Yes
What is it?
A function f:A->B satisfying f(ab) = f(a)f(b) where A and B are groups with some binary operations
I know the product <x> determines a subgroup
Yes
But in this case, $G$ is a cyclic group, so {\sl every/} element of $G$ can be written as $g^k$ for some $k\in\mathbb N$
depression
What I don't get is the uniqueness
Okay
Let's say $f$ and $h$ are two different homomorphisms such that $$f(g)=h(g)=g^k$$
depression
Since they are different, there is an $i$ such that $f(g^i)\ne h(g^i)$
depression
What is the contradiction?
Weren't we talking about automorphisms?
automorphisms are homomorphisms
but with extra conditions as well
f and h can be automorphisms if you want, it doesn't make a difference
This is a more general result
An automorphism is just an invertible homomorphism from G to itself
Why does such index exist?
They are different and all of the elements of G had the form g^m
if $f$ and $h$ are different, then there must be some element $x$ of the group such that $f(x)\ne h(x)$
depression
So there's at least one value where they differ?
depression
What does this exactly provd?
Uniqueness?
.
An endomorphism of a cyclic group is unique
Well no not exactly
There are quite a lot of endomorphisms
But we're talking about endomorphisms such that f(g) = something in particular
That something in particular are the homomorphism satisfying this
No, that something in particular is any generator of G
Could you tell me what the statement is again please?
I got lost
Your question was whether there was a unique automorphism for every generator of G
And I just showed that the answer is yes
If you suppose there are two different of them, why you assumed f(g) = h(g)?
That's what we're showing isn't it?
We're trying to show that there's a bijection between automorphisms of G, and generators of g
.
For any homorphism f, f is an automorphism if and only if f(g) is a generator of G
So for a fixed generator of G, there is an automorphism f such that f(g) = said fixed generator
And this shows it's unique
Look it's been 3 hours and I have stuff to do
But I have given you everything
Ping helpers if you need any more help
Yep, thank you for your patience
@meager ore Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uh help?
how did you get 1000 as the number of terms
hmmm
or am i understanding the question wrongly
i dont think they would have expected you to do that
you were instead expected to use the alternating series error bound
ie that the error in a finite approximation of an alternating series is at most the magnitude of the first term thrown out
wait what
was it not brought up in class 
for a series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^n b_n$, with partial sums $S_n$ and true sum $S$, you have $$|S_n - S| \leq b_{n+1}$$
Ann
@copper ginkgo Has your question been resolved?
