#help-49
1 messages · Page 127 of 1
just need to proof ab is rational
the proof is there lol
after proving ab is rational
let a=m/n and b=p/q
a+b=m/n+p/q=(mq+pn)/nq
and that is a whole number divided by whole number
thus rational
Thr problem is you're assuming previous knowledge about how addition and multiplication works in rationals
I suppose we can assume how they work
$mn^{-1}+pq^{-1} = mqq^{-1}n^{-1}+pnn^{-1}q^{-1}=(mq+pn)q^{-1}n^{-1}$
Axe
Yeah this was what I was thinking of
You will also need a^{-1}b^{-1}=(ab)^{-1} to end it off
aha
yes
because we need to show it's the product of an integer and the inverse of an integer
Yep
sure
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
because that's asking about what's happening around that location
and not the function value itself
What does the red dot above supposed to represent tho?
Also look at th graph given on teh side
Yeah i see that
the dot indicates the function value
Well isnt the function 2 when x approaches to negative 2?
Don't dots show that the function is undefined tho?
f(-2) = 2
My apologies if I am wrong
yeah the function is 2 when it equals -2
but we are infinitely approaching -2
not AT -2
Ohhhhhh
it just says that f(-2) is not -1 and it has a value somewhere else
like the [x] function
but
we are approaching that 1 value infinitely
againt we are not AT the -2 point
and if we are appraoching x=-2
we will get infinitely close to 1 first
before going to 2 AT -2
np
!close
for the limit, you're considering
(btw never learned calculus lol, only heard of some basics of it XD)
Ah
pretty sure it is .close
put a . not !
Closed by @modest flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
👍
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! if anybody is familiar with mathematica/wolfram (i have never touched it in my life), i just wanted to know if its feasible to graph something like this on the app? /how hard would it be/how would i do it 😔also would i need just wolfram engine or actually mathematica bc i dont wanna buy it
,w contour plot cos(x)sin(y) x from 0 to 25, y from 0 to 15
@drowsy hawk Has your question been resolved?
oh thanks!
Closed by @drowsy hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For how many values of the digit $A$ is it true that $63$ is divisible by $A$ and $273{,}1A2$ is divisible by $4$?
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
just try all of the digits with A | 63
there is not too many of them
which numbers are divisible by 63?
63 must be divisible by A
63 is divisible by e.g. 21
but 21 isnt a single digit
so you dont even need to consider that
what else is 63 divisible by?
by 7 and by 3
there are 2 more possible digits
You could just start from 1 and try every possible digit and see if it divides 63
so e.g. 1 does divide 63
2 doesnt
3 does
4 doesnt
5 doesnt
6 doesnz
7 does
...
Divisibility Rule of 4
If the last two digits of a number are divisible by 4, then that number is a multiple of 4 and is divisible by 4 completely
And you can easily test that 12, 32, 72 and 92 are all divisible by 4
so that's it
now just look back at what the question asks for and answer it
Closed by @tidal turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what have you tried?
you basically solved the damn thing
since EBC is an isosceles triangle (angle CEA = angle CBD = 20deg), you know that EC = CB
you now are able to prove the triangle ECA is congruent to triangle BCD
the rest is obvious
wait have you learned congruent triangles?
like sas and stuff?
yeah
oh wait is it angle side side

Closed by @fierce canyon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this?
1st question
I'm stuck here
And 2nd question
I'm here
@anyone 😃
I did 2b
But idk how to do 1) and 2)-a
.close
Closed by @median arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If $x= ( 1 2 3 )$ and $y = (1 2 )$ find $x^2 y$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Make a map of what each number maps to. Do you understand how multiplying permutations works?
Not entirely, but I'm working on it
when you multiply permutations, you take each element, and see what it maps to under the rightmost permutation. take this new value. you then work your way left, and see what this now maps to on the second rightmost permutation.
continue all the way until you reach the leftmost permutation
so I effectively have to find $(1 2) (1 2 3) (1 2 3)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
well when we write $(123)(123)(12)$, we first do the rightmost one, and then middle and then left
Arnavutköy
so it would still be written as $(123)(123)(12)$
Arnavutköy
although a more intutive way of thinking about it is we apply $(12)$ first, and then we apply $(123)$ twice
Arnavutköy
so ( 1,2,2,3) is what I get
which is (1,3)
I suppose I could break it down and see what I get
tell me what $1$, $2$, and $3$ go to
Arnavutköy
1 goes to 3
no. can you work through the steps of what you did to get that so i can see what you are doing wrong?
so under $(12)$, where does $1$ go to
Arnavutköy
Arnavutköy
similarly, where does $2$ and $3$ go?
Arnavutköy
under the first cycle 2 goes to 1, under the next cycel 2 goes to 3 and under the final cycle it goes to 1
3 goes to 3 under the first cycle, to 1 under the second cycle and to 2 under the final cycle
well under the first cycle $2$ goes to $1$, but then we should care about where $1$ goes for the second cycle because that was the result of the first cycle
Arnavutköy
what
wait so like when we plugged in $1$ we had $1\to 2 \to 3\to 1$ right
Arnavutköy
but now, we plug in $2$
Arnavutköy
you did $2\to 1$
yes
Arnavutköy
yes
but then we need to use $1$ next, as that is what we are at right now.
Arnavutköy
so it would be $2\to 1\to 2\to 3$ in fact
Arnavutköy
I still don't follow
in the first cycle it's 1
in the second cycle it maps to 2
and it maps to 3 in the final sycle
oh
right
so we have in the end, $1$ goes to $1$, $2$ goes to $3$, and $3$ goes to $2$
Arnavutköy
you will see that this is always a permutations, no $2$ terms will ever go to the same thing under the product of a bunch of cycles
Arnavutköy
no, $1$ goes to $1$
Arnavutköy
not to $3$
Arnavutköy
yes
don't put the commas by the way
the lack of commas indicate that it is a permutation
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $S$ be a set with an associative law of composition and with an identity element. Prove that the subset consisting of the invertible elements in $S$ is a group
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
So I have to show 3 things
wait
isn't this a group by definition
The law of composition is associative, it posses an identity elements, and all elements in the set are invertible
yeah so associativity is inherited
the identity is also inherited obviously
so all which is left to show is that the law of composition is well-defined (i.e. closure in the subset) and that the inverse is in the group
well first of all what is the definition of invertible we are using here
$a^{-1} a =1=. aa^{-1}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
right
yeah so then if $a$ is in $S$, so is $a^{-1}$ right?
Arnavutköy
you agree that $(a^{-1})^{-1}=a$ (set-wise right?)
Arnavutköy
yes
therefore both $a$ and $a^{-1}$ are in the set. we now just need to show that in the group $a$ and $a^{-1}$ are actually inverses
Arnavutköy
okay, so i will refer to $a^{-1}$ as $c$ because we don't actually know they are inverse in the group yet and its getting confusing
Arnavutköy
so we have that $ac=e$ and $ca=e$
Arnavutköy
so now, take an arbitrary element $b$ in our new set of invertible elements.
Arnavutköy
actually, ignore that
we have that $e$ is the identity in our new group right?
Arnavutköy
and $ac=e$ and $ca=e$ are literally the definition of inverses in the group
Arnavutköy
yes
so this implies that $a$ and $a^{-1}$ are acutally inverses
Arnavutköy
closure is non-trivial
we need to show that the product of two invertible elements is also invertible
we also need to show that if I take two arbitrary elemets, it's in the set
do I not
we need to show that the product of two arbitrary elements is also in the group yes
so suppose we have that $aa^{-1}=a^{-1}a=bb^{-1}=b^{-1}b$.
Arnavutköy
Show that $ab$ is also invertible
Arnavutköy
Hint: Show that $(ab)^{-1}=b^{-1}a^{-1}$.
Arnavutköy
I already have
oh have you showed this? then ur done
you have shown all $4$ properties
- Closure and well-definedness of set (If $a,b$ are invertible then so is $ab$
- Identity (Inherited)
- Associativity (Inherited)
- Inverse (The inverse of the element in the set is also the inverse of the element in the group)
Arnavutköy
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
Is this correct?
lim x-> infinity x root2 root(1-cos(180/x)) = pi
no
Root2?
yes there is a root 2
yes
180 not pi
i think it was intended that cosine was calculated in terms of degrees instead of radians
assuming that cosine is calculated in terms of degrees this is still right though
in the presence of calculus and no degree symbol,
i'm going to assume the original value is in radians regardless of how special it looks
it probably should just be clarified
Must*
ok thank you
so, can this be called a formula for calculating pi?
?
sure, but i mean calculating cosine without using pi is pretty nontrivial
you would have to use taylor series expansions
@summer ravine Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @summer ravine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $G$ be a group. Define an opposite group $G^{\circ}$ , with law of composition $a \ast b$as follows, The underlying set is the same as $G$, but the law of composition $a \ast b =ba$ Prove $G^{\circ}$ is a group
\
Proof: As the underlying set is the same the identity element belongs to the group $G^{\circ}$
\
\
as $a^{-1}a = aa^{-1}$, the group is closed under inverses
\
$a \ast ( b \ast c) = a \ast (cb) = cba$
\
$(a \ast b)\ast c = ba \ast c = cba$
\
this prove its law of composition is associative.
\
It is therefore a group
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
@twilit field Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
4
thats not what closed under inverses means
and just because the identity element of G is still in G^° does not mean that it is also the identity element under the new operation
the part where you show associativity is correct
cool, thanks
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
I suppose I could start by determining what $a \ast 1$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
$a \ast 1 = 1a =a$. Thus It has a multiplicative identity
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
thats not the (full) def of multiplicative identity
I also need to verify that $1 \ast a=a$, which is similarly true
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
$1 \ast a =a1 =. a$ Thus it has a right multiplicative identity, which is equal to its letf multiplicativ idenity
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
that shows 1 is a left identity in G°, not a right identity
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
yeah
I'm not too sure what closure under inverses means tbh
i think what you have to show is closure under *,
and the existence of inverses
these are 2 different things right?
you have to show for all a, b in the underlying set,
a*b is in the set
We already know that in $G$ $ab$ and $ba$ are both in the set .
\
$a \ast b = ba$, which is in $G$ and thus in $G^{\circ}$ and $b \ast a = ab$, which is in $G$ and thus in $G^{\circ}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
👍 it's not necessary to show both a*b and b*a
where
Oh
nvm
Thought I had
as $a^{-1}a = aa^{-1}$, the group is closed under inverses
here
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
you need to show for all a, there's some element b with a*b = b*a = 1
this should be done only after showing 1 is an identity of G°
ah
I see
so $a \ast a^{-1} = a^{-1}a=1$ should come after I show $1$ is an identity in $G^{\circ}$?
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
yeah
you should also say a^-1 * a = aa^-1 = 1
yeah
i think that's it
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with geometry, pyramids to be exact, well i got a hypothenosis and one other side of the base triangle and i got the s and i need to calculate volume, how can i get the height of the pyramid?
a=6cm
that is the other side of the base
and c=10cm
that is the hypothenosis
i already calculated the b and it is 8cm
i also calculated the area of the base and it is 24 square centimeters
i can get the apothem but how do i get the height
but how?
longest side of a right angle triangle
i'm not native in english sorry
oh hypothenuse
the other sides of the triangle
yes!
so its a triangular based pyramid?
yes
whys there an apothem then
that would be helpful thanks
Trigo, law of cosines
Oh man i got a test tomorrow and we haven't learned that
Law of cosines?
No
what informstikn do you have
i dont think that will help here
I have all sides of the base
and the s
is it an equilateral triangle?
are the sides equal
i just used this as a reference
one side is 6cm, the other is 8cm and the hypothenuse is 10cm
the s which is 13cm
I tried literally everything i could think of
is the apex of the pyramid directly over one of the vertices of the triangle?
here is the reference again
i tried but i couldn't get another side to use for pythagorian theorem
the height falls 90 degrees on the base
so if i get some line on the base that has the height on it
i could calculate it
but i don't
If i could get the R i could calculate everything
I sketched every side but i see no way to calculate this
<@&286206848099549185>
@midnight plank
@craggy sequoia Has your question been resolved?
no!?
@craggy sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I find b and a?
I got c = 0 and d = 3 pretty easily
but now i did f''(1) = 0, but thats only getting me 0 = 6a + 2b
Show your whole work
ok
i tried doing a system of equations at the bottom there
with the equation i got from the second derivative
but a != -1
nvm i think im stupid
Where does the bottom equation here come from
yeah
uh
the origianl function
but the next step is wrong
after that
cuz i wrote 2 = a+ b
should be -4
Closed by @vocal briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i swear
im not trippin right???
u1=1/6 and u2=0 doesnt work
cause -12(1/6)+0 !=2
yeah maybe its supposed to be -1/6
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
@tribal temple hii
Hiii
(kinda sleepy but wanted to say hi cause I saw you
)
oh my goddd
smth is wrong
againn
wtf
my work, i’ll redo😓
ahh eigenvectors are wrong
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
ok imma take a short walking break
but ike damn ive got so much to review still
okok
lockin
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
The vector (2,1) has slope 1/2
The eigenvector has slope 2 from the graph
yup!
I got it, thank you
also I feel alot better now
when I first looked at the practice final it was OVER
but now Im just doing each question slowly and looking at solutions, reviewing stuff I didnt review before
so its actually alright, for now
i have a question about c)
but I can say y=Vo^4/Vo^2 - R
oh wait its not squaring entire term
its not (2gR)^2
this makes sense, cause denominator cant be 0
but this doesnt
Do you know what g and R represent physically
oh wait
nono makes sense
why doesn’t this work?
@fallow scarab
wait i found roots wrong
Closed by @obtuse totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the potential energy when the ball is at 40m 40x9.8x0.04?
change in kinetic energy is same as change in potential energy
so at the 40m
it should be 40x9.8x0.04 right
yes that would be the potential energy at the top
what i did is i calculated 10x9.8x0.04
but
actually yeah it gave 196
so v initial is 14 right
and 40x9.8x0.04
but we are only calculating change in kinetic energy from A to B
we have no need to calculate the initial kinetic energy or anything
yeah but A goes from A to the peak to B
it would just be the change in potential energy from 30 meters to 0 meters
yeah, so it gains potential energy and then loses it
it doesn't matter what path the ball takes assuming the energy is being converted to heat or friction or anything. only what matters is the beginning and end for potential energy
okay so 0.4x9.8x30 thats like
118 or smt
x2 and /0.04
588
= v^2
it doesnt rly add up i think
it should be 0.04 not 0.4
and that gives 11.8
yeah no need to calculate speed
wait let me see if i can do it using the method i was using earlier
whihc is individual E_k
okay yeah so basically what i did is U_k of 10m is like 3.92J therefore v initial would be 14m/s
and U_k at 40m would be 15.68
but if i put 15.68 = 1/2mv^2
the v would be like 28
wait
what am i doing
why am i calcu.ating speed again
again, this is te whole point of kinetic and potential energy
they didn't want you to calculate speed, that is hard
Closed by @keen seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My book says the klein four group, consisting of the four matices $\begin{bmatrix} \pm 1 & \&\pm 1 \end{bmatrix}$ is the simplest group that's not cyclic
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
this is not a rigorous definition
i just think they mean it is the easiest example to come up with
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do c
😦
Did you draw a line of best fit 
If so, "the usual way", e.g. pick two points from the line of best fit and use those
yeah i did
but look at the answer
How can it be 1.32 when
X moves less fast than y
Well if y moves faster than x, you’d expect the gradient to be more than 1, which it is, no…
Unless you meant to say the other way around? (In which case,
)
It would[n’t], but it doesn’t here 
E.g. at x = 1, you’re less than 1, about 0.6, but at x = 2, you’re more than 2, about 2.2
So y increased more than x does at least there
Yes y increase more than x here
So why is c) 1.32 aka more than 1
That’s what i wanted to know
Oh wait I just noticed what you said, no not this 
It would be less than 1
Yeah….
(e.g. think about the line y = 0.5x or something)
Well how exactly do you mean “x moves faster than y” here? 
For a fixed change in x, you have that y will change more than that, and that makes the gradient more than 1
If it were the other way around, for a fixed change in x that you have y changes less than that, you’d have the gradient being between 0 and 1 (assuming positive change of course)
In this
@keen seal Has your question been resolved?
Turns out
I always thought for slope it was x2-x1/y2-y1
So that means
I finished calculus
And linear algebra
Without ever realizing
It was the contrary
………
How in the universe
Did that happen 😭😭😭
Closed by @keen seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wait is it even possible for a rhombus to have diagonals 1000 and 0.001?
😭
why not
there are none
Closed by @gusty falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find the first
why this extra thing
if it said I on top combines the inertia of two disks
@keen seal Has your question been resolved?
parallel axis theorem
uh

but it said that I there was made of two disks of different size)
so doesnt it incorporate both? supposedtly
also
theres not even the mass of body
they didnt give
@keen seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @keen seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wave 9 guys, can i clear it?
it doesn't make sense to me
does this mean
$$log (12) = log (3) \cdot log(2) \cdot log(2)$$
Jaeger
$$\log (AB) = ??$$
JustToPro
no , its just to spot ur mistake
log 12 = log (3 * 2 * 2)
and u said log AB = log A + log B
Then how did u write that equation as log 3 * log2 * log2
dude log has so many traps wtf
do you know answer to 1?
ofc
yeah then show me what i need to do
basically
i know all the rules and still dunno how to act here
$$\log 12 = \log (2 \cdot 2 \cdot 3)$$
$$\implies \log 12 = \log 2 + \log 2 + \log 3$$
$$\implies \log 12 = x + x + y$$
JustToPro
simple stuff , no need to break log rules
lol what is up with 200 i can't think of a common multiplier where 2, 3 and 7 become 200
yeah i got no clue myself xD
- is 2z - y
probably make it 2 * 10 * 10
but idk what they wants from us D:
- y -x
- is crazy i think it is x - x -y
@elder zephyr wave 9 is crazy
- log (2 *7) /log 3
so z+x - y
4 should be in theory
log (2/6)
so: log 2 / log (2 *3)
x - ( x + y)
but it is wrong i guess
yeah no this is complex stuff
.close
Closed by @eternal pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi!
if i need to prove that for all even n i can find some k st k(2^n)+1 is composite
can i proof it like this
i assume k(2^n)+1 is prime and then i prove that if it is prime i can make a definite modification to k to make it composite?
like basically i proved that if i find k such that this sum is prime i can find a k for which the sum is composite by adding 2 to the original k for which it is prime
i would just look at the residues mod 3
well aside from 2 and 3 yes
what i proved is that if this number is ≡ 1 mod 6 or ≡ 5 mod 6 for some k, i can make both of these ≡ 3mod6 by increasing k by 2
and any number ≡ 3mod6 can never be prime right
in essence the same thing
i feel like this is just false
wait lmao this was a case i took where n>=4 i proved for n=2 separately
@jovial crest Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\lim_{(x, y) \to (0, 0)} \frac{y^4}{x^4 + 3y^4}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
I have to determine if this exists or not
I suspect not
we first approach along the x-axis , in which case the limit doesn't exist
we then approach it along the y-axis, in which case the limit is 1/3
That’s it
0/0 at 0
yes so it's undefined at (0,0)
but as you approach (0,0) it's 0
0/x^4 is 0 for x!=0
If it didn't exist then that would automatically be enough to say the whole limit doesn't exist
[
\lim_{(x,y) \to (1,0)} \ln \left( \frac{1 + y^2}{x^2 + xy} \right)
]
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Here, I was thinking we approach it along x=-1 and the x-axis]
you can't approach along x=-1 but you can approach along x=1
the line must intersect (1,0)
okay
right
so approaching it along x =1 , we get $\lim_{y\to 0} ln(\frac{1+y^2}{1+y})$$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
mx plus b
y=mx+b?
tried y=x-1, it gives the same limit
Sorry, I've got to sleep now
thanks for the help
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\theta \in \mathbb{R}, n \in \mathbb{N}$ calculate the remainder of the division of the polynomial $(\cos{\theta} + x \sin{\theta})^n \in \mathbb{R}[x]$ by $x^2 + 1$
isomorphic to god
is it $\cos{\theta} + x \sin{\theta}$?
isomorphic to god
i did the calculations in $\mathbb{C}[x]$, dividing by $x-i$ and $x+i$ and since the degree of the remainder is 1 or 0 we can find it in $\mathbb{C}[x]$
isomorphic to god
<@&286206848099549185>
@proud scaffold Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
cmon helpers, easy question
helpers of mathematics when they see a question that isn't about calculus or probability: 😱
maybe don't be a dick
useless comment
answer my question or get off
useful because volunteers don't want to help people who are dicks
ergo, don't be a dick
no it’s cos(nθ)+xsin(nθ)
use the complex trig identities and the remainder theorem
you’re welcome. now act your age
@proud scaffold Has your question been resolved?
if it's an easy question then why are you here asking about it
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone got a video on how to solve these
Ik the limit is x--> 0 but idk what the F(X) exists is supposed to help me with
means the limit to 0 from left and right is the same
Wym left and right
going to 0+ and 0-
Oh
U got a vid on how to solve these tho? Going through the entire process
What do I search on yt
All I know is that these are piecewise calculus limit questions?💀
Dang
Ight ty
.close
Closed by @noble jewel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For this equation I am starting by making the common denominator across the equation 4x which is getting me 6x^2 - 4x + 16x = 52 - x - 6x^2 but I'm wondering if that isn't what I should be doing for the first step since I find it difficult to complete the equation after that.
@fringe vector Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fringe vector
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do ii?
,w diff x^2 * log(2x)
U must integrate by parts
solve for x log(2x) in part i) and then integrate both sides
$\int \frac{dy}{dx} dx = y + C$
riemann
Skissue ping4response
like this lol?
$\int 2x\log(2x) dx = \int \lp \frac{dy}{dx} - x \rp dx$
there should be a 2 though as a constant multiple for the left side
oh i left a 2 out yes
so it becomes $y-\frac{x^2}{2}+C$
Skissue ping4response
?
riemann
yea then divide everyone by 2 and convert y back to what it was
divide everyone by 2
$\frac{x^3\ln(2x)}{4}$
Skissue ping4response
wait
why is there an x^3
ln(2x)
ugj
close though
Skissue ping4response
🤌🏻
,w int xlog(2x)
0 points. forgot to factor out x^2
.close
Closed by @viral dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
bonk
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this solution wrong? i thought the derriv of cosx was -sinx
where did sec come from?
from the derivative rule
division rule
and then the composite function derivative rule
yes, basically
you can rewrite $f$ as $f(x)=\cos(x^6)\sec^5(x)$ and then use the chain rule, product rule and the fact that $\frac{\dd }{\dd x}\sec(x)=\sin(x)\sec^2(x)$
derivada.schwarziana
@fluid bronze Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help solving A-D please step by step
what have you tried?
Oh wait sorry it’s multiple choice so
I haven’t try anything since I didn’t get it
do you know how to use a unit circle
Nope
do you know what it is
jan Niku
Yeah I heard of it before
so you know what it tells you
I’m not sure how to use it
it tells you sine, or cosine, of an angle
Right what do I look for then?
jan Niku
Yeah
jan Niku
Yeah
so if we can find $\frac{-7\pi}{4}$ on this unit circle we are basically done
jan Niku
thats positive
Ohhh
all the angles on the unit circle are nonnegative
so we need to make -7pi/4 into ap ositive angle
How do we do that?
This trigonometry video tutorial explains how to find a positive and a negative coterminal angle given another angle in degrees or in radians using the unit circle. It also shows you how to convert radians to degrees and degrees to radians. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems.
Trigonometry - Free Formula Sheet: ...
if you are totally new
basically: you add 360 degrees / 2 pi
Yeah
Would it be D then?
Wait can you show me how you would solve it please? I’m a visual learner so 😭
Mmmm
No sorry my bad I’m multitasking rn
I think I got it tho I’ll js watch the video
sure sorry
i cant really understand it for you
you have to interact with it, youll get it
@grave creek Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how are the coordinates (2acostheta,0) and (0,2asin theta)
what
It’s makes a right angled triangle
With hypotenuse 2a and an angle θ
sin(θ)=opp/hyp=opp/2a
Multiply by 2a
2asin(θ)=opp
cos(θ)=adj/hyp=adj/2a
multiply by 2a
2acos(θ)=adj
my teacher said to solve via parametric
do yk how to solve it by parametric?
Not sure about that sorry
@barren onyx Has your question been resolved?
.
.close
Closed by @barren onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

