#help-49
1 messages · Page 114 of 1
It’s right except the first y you could just leave that as x
ah alright
(y-7)(y-2)
Good now substitute x^2 back in for y
One more step 🙂
And don’t forget the x at the beginning
Yes but the brackets around aren’t necessary
You’re welcome
Does the problem expect you to factor out x^2 - 7 further?
lemme js screenshot all this
lemme check
How would you factor that further?
nope it doesnt
7 isn’t a square number
Yeah but couldn't you use square roots
have u been in this server for 6 years 😨
I don’t think anything would require you to do that if B isn’t a perfect square
Unless it explicitly tells you
Closed by @hearty nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to calculate when theres two singularities enclosed in a closed loop
I understand for the case where theres one singularity that is outside the loop, you would include it in the f(z)
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
You just sum the residue separately
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
@fallow scarab what should you do if the curve is clockwise and traversed two times?
for clockwise, I’m assuming you just take the negative integral of counterclockwise
i’ll send the question
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @obtuse totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find the function for this graph
a(x+4)(x-1.5)(x-2.9)
is the trick I learned
0/3.1
3.1= a *4 *-1.5 *-2.9
a60/29 = 3.1
divide by 60/29
1.498333333333
It just isn't quite it
i have no idea how to explain this but this isnt a third degree polynomial function
So my trick only works on third degree?
it is
basically how do I do it with 2nd degree and anything above 3?
im not really sure, someone else probably knows, sorry
@olive herald Has your question been resolved?
@olive herald Has your question been resolved?
@olive herald Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me with a ? im trying to solve using first order approximations
have you got the total resistance?
yeah
which is?
in series 790
parallel 59,97
thats simple
the confusing part is finding the tolerance
find the min and max resistance for each resistor
overall tolerance
basically each resistor has a range of possible resistances, ie an interval
add the min and max for each interval to get the range for R
100 ohm -> 95 - 105, 220 ohm -> 209 - 231, 470 ohm -> 423 - 517
i add 95 209 and 423?
@dense arch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find pmf
@flint anchor Has your question been resolved?
@flint anchor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me with transportation problems
@spice perch Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @spice perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
After splitting apart an integral like: $5\cdot\int(2x+3x)dx$, the number infront has to be multiplied across everything like this: $5\bigg(\int(2x)dx+\int(3x)dx\bigg)$, right?
dingypine
@hardy shuttle Has your question been resolved?
right
Closed by @hardy shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you do this?
@austere quest Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @austere quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @austere quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i think that the domain would be the intersection of the domain of both
because we need both to be defined at the values x's
then we can add as usual
@neat canyon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for part a, i think its true, but im unsure how to prove
as I reach the point where -e < bn - Lb < e
and -e < an -La < e
but i cant show that an < ab from La < Lb
i am here
sorry i was looking at problem
oh ok
how so?
no.
nevermind
it means that there lmit of the sqeucne appraoches a value
hmm
but epsilon must be greater than 0
are you saying choose two differnet epsilon?
It's similar to how you prove that a limit can converge only to at most one value.
No
i get an - e < La
this question quite literally has nothing to do with GPs
im just lost on how to do this inequlity. Liike since epsilon is always positive i cant really show an < bn
perhaps one should draw a picture
The idea is that both sequences approach a different value, so they eventually aren't close to each other. You should try a sketch
yes... but this is what I am getting |an - La| < e and |bn - Lb| < e
like i see it intuitevly
but stuck on how to show using epsilon defintion
how big should e be so that they're separated from each other?
how big is the gap between La and Lb
shouldn
shouldn't it just be Lb - La?
since Lb > La
yes
hmm that doesn't seem to work tho
so to separate Lb from La
you need to keep the an terms on the left half of that gap
and the bn terms on the right half of that gap
notice how i said half
half of gap... wait hmm
but the problem is the bn terms could be on both sides of the gap...
i think
that's not how limits work
if bn were consistently on the left half of the gap, they would be no limit
yes but e can be any positive number
as small as you want
yeah
and all bn past a certain point must satisfy that inequality
all -e < bn - Lb < e
so all bn past a certain point must be as close to Lb as you desire
for example, closer than half the gap
hmm, im not quite seeing this in terms of inequlities tho
set e = (Lb - La)/2
-e < bn - Lb rewrites into (La + Lb)/2 < bn
an - La < e rewrites into an < (La + Lb)/2
hmmm wait a sec
hmm but how come this doesnt work with generalized values of epsilon?
like any epislon > 0
it works for any epsilon < (Lb - La)/2
and that's all that matters
you only need one good choice of epsilon to do the proof
wait but how come when i plug in epsilon for an - e < bn + e i dont quite get the same answer...?
You do the reverse.
a_n < a_n + e < bn - e < b_n
ig, what was missing whwen i just directly did an - e < La < Lb < bn + e
but i end up with an < bn + 2e
not very helpful is it
yeah
which is why you should be using the other side of the inequalities
hmmm, like which side again sry
as was just mentioned by azyrstufficantspell
oh hmm
right here
yeah i dont see how a_n + e < b_n - e
well that's the point
you need to choose some good values of e so that it is true
i did that for you earlier
right about here
dang okay. I hmm. Like did you figure that out from looking at a number line?
well what could you possibly choose
i explained what you have to do here
im not sure. Im just confused on how to even figure that out
and all i did was put that into symbols
yeah. Ig i didnt really see hmm
all you had to do was draw a picture and look at it
it doesn't even have to be 1/2
you could take 69/420 on one side
and 351/420 on the other
or take 69/420 on both sides it doesn't matter
as long as you divide the gap into two bits that don't overlap
like the gap is between La, Lb
yes
Lb - La is the gap
make the an terms be stuck on one half and the bn terms be stuck on the other
now they'll never see each other ever again
oh like the epsilon needs ot be so that La + e < Lb - e?
yes
ohhh wait. Because i only had the condoiiton that e > 0. But i needed anotehr condition that e < Lb + La /2 ?
therefore i didnt have enough information to make a conclusion
i gave examples here
hmm. Is that the ratio of La to Lb?
or wait, do we need to chose differnet epsilon i think for a_n and b_n?
you can
but you don't have to
if you choose the same epsilon, it had better be at most half the gap
like how would it worko with 351/420? Because we are using the same epsilon im not seeing on the diagram how that would owrk
but if you use different epsilon, you can choose them to sum to at most the gap
an < La + 69/420 (La - Lb)
Lb - 351/420 (La - Lb) < bn
ah, so the 351/420 (like any number not 1/2) would require two different epsilon
yeah, it seems the epsilon need to be difernet
since one extends 351/420 of La - Lb
while another extends less than that
oh wait. If i choose two differnet epsilons ohh wait... number line really helps i see. Since as long as the epsiilon less than Lb-La/2
as long as any epsilon chosen so it doesn't intersect like you said then it works. However i was wondeirng, is there a way to do so without number line? Or like figuring out with inequality? Im just curious in case there coems a times when i can no logner use number line
well
that's like asking "can i do geometry without drawing diagrams"
like yes but good luck
oh dang alr. sry i ddint know much. Its cuz i plan on taking analyssi in the future
but manifoldy stuf
but like i see the diagrams for that
and i am jsut confused
also for part b this is my proof
i think its false
because if the limits can be equal
then i can find a number n for all N in naturals such an > bn
sure
so proof seems alr then
ye
@crisp obsidian Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
implicit differentiation
what I did was cancel the dy/dx on the 8 since the y is gone when you derive it
but I assume that is dumb so idk what to do
what how
I skipped a bunch of steps but its just deriving everything and then moving everything to one side
oh the y is not really gone
dy/dx(8y) = 8(dy/dx)
well, time to re do it rq
Drei-kun
yeah I got that
Drei-kun
after this, you factor out the dy/dx in 18y and 8
the final ans? not quitee
hhmmm
soo try thiss
oh
then after that, you divide both sides by 18y + 8 to get your dy/dx
lmk if u got it or u got confused on smth
I GET IT WAIT WAIT
NICEEE
🔥
i forgor abt factoring
thats what was confusing me
thats how you turn it all into one
yup all the dy/dx remains on the left side
then js factor it
Closed by @near hazel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i set up the equations pls
@opaque kestrel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It’s not given that KRU is 90 degrees
You can even see in the diagram that there’s a little tilt (though you shouldn’t be going off the diagram(
It can be a scalene triangle
(and is)
Which again you can see visually, but you shouldn’t be going off of the diagram. It’s just a clue in
If it was isosceles you’d be correct
dude he is trying his best
be grateful someone is trying to help you
because i have other stuff to do...?
we arent obliged to help you
wtf?
hi ren
camarozzz please do not ping moderators because you are not receiving help
yo
like death here said, we are not obliged to help you
and just because you didn't instantaneously get the assistance you required from a helper doesn't mean you call them out to mods of all people
please be patient
@spiral ravine Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fallow scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Got banned
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please help with questions 11 and 11
,rotate
Ooh
But how second quadrant? X>=0
Yaaa
Sorry didn't see that
Does the region have finite area and it doesn't extend forever
It's bounded
This one is bounded
Welcome
.close
Closed by @low tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
Dumb me, I need help with the next question too pls
Determinants
Yea
Are numbers associated with square matrix
Accosted?
So c
Okkk
Because determinant can only be calculated for n×n matrix
Closed by @low tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
chatgpt told me is
[
\text{Total Arrangements} = 5! \times \binom{6}{4} \times 4! = 120 \times 15 \times 24 = 43,200
]
Mushfiqur
but I have doubt with this answer
@abstract cape Has your question been resolved?
i would also not trust chatgpt for math, but what is your specific doubt with this answer? (I have not yet confirmed if it is right or wrong)
chatgpt is correct
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I started by assuming v is an eigenvector and a is the corresponding eigenvalue
so $(T-\lambda I)(v)=0$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
so $av -a\lambda v =0$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
A dense set(Ping when reply)
you know how p(x) = det(T - x I) is a polynomial?
no idea
this is from axler so you can solve it without any mention of determinants
A dense set(Ping when reply)
equal to the dimension of $n$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
false
Why does it only have a single eigenvalue
Tv = 0v = 0
$\lambda_2 v - \lambda v=0$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
that doesnt answer the question
T could have many more eigenvalues than just 1
the crux of this question lies in determining how many there can be
okay so you know there are only finitely many
now you are given α
where will the eigenvalues be positioned relative to α
they can be less than or more than or equal to
do you know that F has an ordering?
when it's C , no ordering, no
where can the eigenvalues be placed relative to α?
No idea
yes
so can they be arbitrarily close to α?
no
because?
there's no measure of closness without orderiing
false
you have the absolute value
you can certainly measure distances in C
lets say the eigenvalues of T are λ₁, λ₂, ..., λₙ, and for now assume that α does not coincide with any of these
how close can the eigenvalues get to α?
arbitrarily close
the λ₁, λ₂, ..., λₙ are fixed, and α is also fixed
your job is to show that you can find a small disc around α that doesn't contain any eigenvalues
Yes
so thats what you're supposed to do in this problem
λ₁, λ₂, ..., λₙ, and α are given
find a small disc around α that doesnt contain any λs

Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is the solution for the first D.E
very readable mhm
i feared it
what's the second bit
1 min i will write down myslef and send it
ren
i hope this is readable
ll
lol
solution for the second D.E
solution for the first D.E
Then he said Homogenous solution
there is no problem in adding a 0
yep
compute this for both the left and right term
one of them is solution of the driven equation
so it's gonna be equal to
the other is solution of the undriven equation
so it's 0
Newton notation wow
when you add a solution of the undriven equation, the total drive doesn't change
because its 0 anyways
what does he mean by homogenous solution over here?
adding solutions of 2 different D.E's ?
but this can't be a solution for the undriven D.E
why so ?
isn't it supposed to be like this ?
i saw a similar process while using complex numbers for proving smth else in SHM
hehe too many questions sorry :P
i just had to look up what homogenous solutions are 😅
.solved
Closed by @gleaming geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
the physical interpretation makes much more sense
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question 18
Please ping
@low tiger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help with question 18 pls
,rccw
Whatt did u try?
Is it's a line joining a and b its b- a right?
Yep
Yes
So b?
Yes
But y not c?
I took the coefficients of I, j and k as Dr's and taking 2 and lambda
Okie thx
Anytime
That is what I was confused about
Okk
Bye
Bye
.close
Closed by @low tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Sketch the graph of a function that is increasing between
points (0, 0) and (3, 8) and decreasing between points (3, 8)
and (9, –3) how to draw it
@everyone
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
let $log_2(3)=x$. Then $2^x=3$ , so $2^{\frac{p}{q}} =3$ Thus $2^p=3^q$ which is absurd, as $3^q$ is always odd, and $2^p$ is always even, thus $x$ can't be rational
why is that absurd
A dense set(Ping when reply)
p=0?
That would require q=0, which isn't possible
you can just directly assume that p and q are natural numbers considering that x>0, and therefore the LHS is also even whereas the RHS is always odd in the equation 2^p = 3^q, therefore a contradiction and showing x cannot be rational
mhm
Thanks!
no problem :))
I think contradiction works here
Let $x= \frac{p}{q}$ be a solution. where p,w are co-prime
$\frac{p^3}{q^3}+ \frac{p}{q}=-3$ so $p^3+q^2p=-3q^3$
\
We start by dividing across by $q^2$
\
That would mean that $\frac{p^3}{q^2}+p=-3q$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
that would mean $q^2 \mid p^3$ which isn't posible as p,q are co-prime
we have thus arrived at a contradiction
A dense set(Ping when reply)
yes, this looks correct
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
We thus wish to show $3 \mid a^3-a \implies 3 \mid [ a(a-1)(a+1)]$let $a= 3k$, in this case we're done as $3\mid 3k$, let $a = 3k+1$, we're done here too as then $3 \mid a-1$. Lastly, let $a=3k+2$ then $3\mid a+1$, and we're done.
A dense set(Ping when reply)
Is this fine
@twilit field Has your question been resolved?
Yes, this looks fine
thanks
I’m pretty sure you can just say that by pigeonhole principle, given this factorisation is the product of three consecutive integers, there must be one of them that is divisible by 3.
That's smart
ngl
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Q = 1?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to calculate this
you can also observe that 6^(n + 4) dominates in the numerator, and that 11^(n = 1) dominates in the denominator
hence the limit equals $\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{6^4 \cdot 6^n}{11 \cdot 11^n} = \frac{6^4}{11} \cdot 0$
south, just south
i figured out it's 0
dominates as in when you divide the numerator and denominator by the leading terms, the other terms in the numerator and denominator will go to 0
but I need formal proof
no need
these exercises just want you to calculate it
I know
@rose steppe Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rose steppe
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so here T,S^-1TS have different eigenvalues,?
What have you tried so far?
I thought their eigenvectors were the same
No
ah
No, but they can be expressed nicely
I would actually try to do b) before a). Try to find an eigenvalue for S^(-1)TS if v is an eigenvalue for T
This shouldn't be so hard. The second thing I tried worked
hmm
Would the eigenvectors of S-1TS just be ||Sv||?
A dense set(Ping when reply)
S^-1(T(v))?
yes
I mean it works, but since T(v) = some scalar multiple of v, why not just use v?
oh
also if v is an eigenvector for eigenvalue 0...
A dense set(Ping when reply)
so that gives us $S^{-1}T(v)$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
so $S^{-1}(\lambda(v)) = \lambda S^{-1}(v)$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
Do you mean S^(-1)v?
I don't think so
so the eigenvector of S^{-1}TS is S^{-1}(v)?
i think @carmine void agrees with you
but I got something different for some reason
Let $v'$ be an eigenvector of $S^{-1}TS$ with eigenvalue $\lambda$, then $S^{-1}TSv'=\lambda v'$ or $TSv'=\lambda Sv'$
kheerii
so Sv' = (constant) * v, where v is a corresponding eigenvector of T with eigenvalue lambda
oh wait yeah
my bad
my method matches
Now this shows they have the same eigenvalues
does it
yes
hmmmm
interesting
because we showed a one-one correspondence between the eigenvectors?
I think so
that's pretty sick
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
No clue how to start
Yes
Did nothing
f(k).f(3) <0
Kya kar lunga iska
Ha
Itna hi hota hai
Exactly one root ka condition
D > 0 lagake intersection lega fir pata chalega D>0 useless hai
Already isme aa jata hai
Closed by @manic bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Aa gaya
how
Condition diya hai usme wo f(4) + a hai
hm
Waise karke usko f(3) + kuch convert kar
f(3) + 8a + b?
Nah
then?
Hame f(x).f(3) pe comment karna hai
f(3) ko -(8a+b) likh sakte hai
yess
Ha
now?
alright
f(5) = 25a + 5b + c = 8a + b, ah
.close
i used IVT and reached $\operatorname{sgn}\left[(k^2-17)a+(k-4)b\right]=\operatorname{sgn}(8a+b)$ and got stuck lol thanks
@chilly adder
seems intuitive to compare the coefficients but thats not rigorous
.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Quick question to anyone familiar with mean sea level. Is mean sea level a point on a vertical datum, or a surface
There are a lot of asterisks about the term "mean sea level." But the surface itself is called the geoid. The mean sea level is just a standardized value applicable to a specific coast
I hope this answers your question, but let me know if I misinterpreted it.
@last slate
.close
Closed by @civic sorrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The newly revised Second Edtion of this distinctive text uniquely blends interesting problems with strategies, tools, and techniques to develop mathematical skill and intuition necessary for problem solving. Readers are encouraged to do math rather than just study it. The author draws upon his ex...
Does someone know where i could find a french translation of this book
or know where i could find a book that explains math problem solving and math in general that could recomment me ?
any book about math you recommend ?
i love you : )
@umbral scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey everyone i am on section d of this question.
I have plotted A and B on my circle however i cannot figure out where the point O comes from?
is the perpendicular bisector of AB and where that meets the circle point A?
Origin I guess
Like point of origin
@exotic beacon Has your question been resolved?
that didnt maker a triangle though
oh wait maybe
ill try both
Closed by @exotic beacon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm studying the continuity of
$f(x,y)=x+y+\frac{x^3y}{x^4+y^2}$
Miguel
And 0 if not defined
I checked continuity, it's continuous. I calculated partial derivatives (1 and 1)
So for derivability I need
$\lim_{x,y\to (0,0)}\frac{f(x,y)-x-y}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}$
Miguel
$= \lim_{x,y\to (0,0)}\frac{x^3y}{(x^4+y^2)\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}$
Miguel
And I don't know how to calculate this limit
I feel it doesn't exist, but I'm not sure
Oh, they're also asking me if the directional derivatives are continuous, but let's check this first
the limit is 0
How do I prove it?
I've not studied L'hôpital with multivariate
I gotta do it bounding it by something that tends to 0
@radiant remnant Has your question been resolved?
@radiant remnant Has your question been resolved?
it might help to notice that since $(x^2 - y)^2 \geq 0$, $x^4 - 2x^2y + y^2 \geq 0$, so $\frac{x^4 + y^2}{2} \geq x^2y$. then if we multiply both sides by $x$ and take absolute values (to preserve this inequality), we can write $\frac{|(x^4 + y^2)x|}{2} \geq |x^3y|$
higher!
then $f(x, y) \leq x + y + \frac{|(x^4 + y^2)x|}{2(x^4 + y^2)} = x + y + \frac{|x|}{2}$
higher!
and the RHS goes to 0 as (x, y) \to (0, 0)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help confirming that one of these is invariant
I am having a really hard tracking the substitution
say we take xy'' = y y'
and lets call it x -> az where z is the new iv
but i know this is wrong
d/dx(f(ax)) = df/d(ax) d(ax)/dx = a f'(ax). No?
im not sure what you mean. why are you looking at f(ax)?
True, sorry
i know the answer is supposed to be something like at least $\frac 1a \dv{y}{f} = \dv{y}{x}$
jan Niku
but i cannot get that to come out
@floral apex Has your question been resolved?
it'd help to think of it in terms of $x \mapsto ax$. $y(x) \mapsto y(ax)$. $y'(x) \mapsto ay'(ax)$ from chain rule. $y''(x) \mapsto a^2 y''(ax)$ can you write the entire equation in terms of before $x$ and after $\mapsto ax$ ?
riemann
before: $$xy'' = yy'$$ after: $$ax \qty( a^2 y''(ax) ) = y(ax) a y'(ax)$$
jan Niku
why
because its not invariant
divide both sides by a
sure, you get $$a (ax) y''(ax) = y(ax) y'(ax)$$
jan Niku
oh your after you multiplied by a onto x
i dont know what that means
that a shouldn't be there
yea but you don't have it to start
what do you mean
im not sure i follow
maybe you have a suggestion of another way to write this
Try $t = ax$ so that $x = t/a$ and abuse $\dot{y} = \frac{dy}{dt}$ and express $\dot{y}$ in terms of $y'$ etc.
riemann
your "equidimensional" ODE should be the same with just dots instead of primes
oh, I'm just dumb
man I'm having the thickest brained few days here
sorry riemann, appreciate it
.close
Closed by @floral apex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
all good! i didn't really express it well until the end
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does this look right? the answer im supposed to get is -5/8
im given that dx/dt = 10
Well you know the value of y at x=8 right?
Yep!
.close
Closed by @paper owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay.
do you know how to proceed
If I recall this correctly…
It’s solving for a number in the upper and lower bounds, subtracting them, and adding them all together right?
Hello, I am wondering if any of you could solve this problem, it's a function: "3x+1" and x times 2. if the number is odd, you multiply it by 3, add 1, if the number is even, you divide it by 2. Have fun 😄 (you can start with any number you wish)
Um…
bruh
This is for MY problem.
im not really sure what you mean
you need to split up the integral now
Yeah that’s what I mean.
One other thing.
wdym "bruh"?
You’re in the wrong chat room.
just ignore them
woops
whats ur q
sorry, im new here
turn $\cos^2$ into something easier
rain
Lol what?
How would I do that?
well do you know the antiderivative of sec^2
That would be 1/cos^2x right?
@obtuse willow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @obtuse willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this two column proof
Hey @void rose
hi
Since 5 and 6 are equal
3 and 4 will be equal too
Correct?
yeah
And LR is common side for both triangle
And is hence equal for both of them
Is this enough of a hint?
I think you can manage it from this point on
uhh yeah i got it thank you
Closed by @void rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
What part of the problem are you stuck on?
tension part
im not really good at physics so i cant really tell the difference between the magnitude and the tension
Are you trying to find it via vectors or component method
i dont know 😦
funny i just had an exam on this and forgot but i can help. so youd want to split the triangle into 2 right angle triangles
so then youre able to find tension in AC and BC seperately
you can use trigonometry to find the tension in each cable
so the hypotenuse gives the T in AC or BC
oh wait we dont have an angle
oh but you have two sides
@hard karma Has your question been resolved?
@hard karma Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hard karma
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I would like to prove that $gcd(a,b) = gcd(a+nb,b)$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
I was thinking that induction would be a good idea
not really necessary, you can do a direct proof
hmm
show that if d divides a and b, then it divides a + nb
then show that if d divdes a+nb and b, then it divides a
that's all you need to do
can let d be any divisor
sure
the argument i sketched shows that {a,b} and {a+nb, b} have exactly the same set of common divisors
therefore they have the same gcd
we then have $d \mid b$ trivially . We also have $d \mid a \land d \mid nb \implies d \mid a+nb$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
we now prove if $d \mid b \land d \mid a+nb \implies d \mid a$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
try expressing a in terms of b and a+nb
$b=dk$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
$a+nb = dk_1$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
so $nb=ndk$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
this tells us $d\mid a$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
@twilit field Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
