#help-49
1 messages · Page 110 of 1
@untold oyster Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @untold oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
How?
Do you know how to multiple two products?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
you could find the pattern
oh hi
Hi
找 pattern
the wha??
I only see multiples of 6
indeed
and there is a reason for that
lets say you finish the first hexagon
now you put six rods around the hexagon
Ok
just see if you can find a pattern with the number of surrounding rods to be attached for each n
for 1, it is 6 as we did now
or you can even count and figure it out
Hmm
36
over here
12
18
Ye
if we take n = 3 as an example we can see that there are two different types of hexagons
there are six hexagons at the corners
which need 3 more rods to be completed
and six hexagons at the sides
which need 2 more rods to be completed
and now for n = 4
we still have 6 corner hexagons, but now we have 12 hexagons at the sides
can you find the formula for the number of side hexagons for a given n from this?
Ye
and it is 6 at n = 3
so,
n = 3: 6 * 1
n = 4: 6 * 2
n = 5: 6 * 3
and so on
can you find a relation between n and the number we multiply with 6?
N-2
yes
6 * (n-2)
is the number of side hexagons
and the number of corner hexagons is always 6
so how many rods do we need to complete all corner hexagons?
yes
for now we have 6n surrounding rods and 18 corner rods
so how many rods do we need to complete all the side hexagons?
@kind coyote Has your question been resolved?
Doesn’t it vary depending on n
yes
so here
you can just multiply the expression by 2
so 6 * (n-2) * 2 = 12 * (n-2) rods to complete the side hexagons
and now we finally can say how many rods we would need to go to n from n - 1
can you figure it out?
we have 6n surrounding rods, 18 corner hexagon rods and 12 * (n-2) surrounding rods
and you need to add them all up now
48
Little
12n -24
18n-6
ok
so thats the total number of rods you need to get from layer n-1 to n
wait
no
i think its 6(n-1) instead of 6n
we need 6 rods to go to n = 2
so we just need to add 6n - 6 instead of 6n
to get 18n - 12
to go to n = 2 from n = 1 we need 18 * 2 - 12 = 24 rods
okk
Ok
now finally
we can make an expression for the number of rods for a given n
say we start at n = 1 (6 rods)
and we want to reach n = 3
so first we will go to n = 2
which needs 18 * 2 - 12 = 24 rods
and then go to n = 3
which needs 18 * 3 - 12 = 42 rods
so totally we would need 6 + 24 + 42 = 72 rods
for n = 3
so to reach a given n
we can start from n = 1
and then go step-by-step
6 + (18 * 2 - 12) + (18 * 3 - 12) + ... + (18 * n - 12)
giving us the total number of rods
hmm
@kind coyote Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @kind coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not really a true math question
I know that, well, if there are some x white balls and y blue balls
The probability of taking out a white ball is
x/(x+y)
Now if I take out a ball, without observing what it is
and then a second ball is picked
the probability that the second ball is white is still x/(x+y)
but what is the logical reasoning to this?
this is very counter intuitive and also relates to the double slit experiment
but can't really understand the logic to it
if there is one
for what i understood that picking without observing is the same as not picking could be wrong
yeah i mean i had the same thought too
like its as if youre picking it up for the first time
but i didnt know if it was really correct or not
.close
Closed by @grave kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does this look
The set ${v}$ is a linealry independent set, we know that any linearly independent set can be extended to a basis set, thus any non-zero vector in a finite dim vector space is aprt of a basis
then why are you writing spanning set instead of basis
A dense set
here will a single counterexample in $\R^4$ suffice
A dense set
yes
Let $v_1,v_2$ be basis of $U$. We also first extend this to a basis of $V$; ${v_1,v_2,v_3,v_4}$ consider another basis of $V$, $v_1+v_3, v_2+v_4, v_2+v_3, v_4$. Clearly none of these vector are a basis of $U$, nevertheless they span $V$. Thus the statement is false
A dense set
why are none of these vectors a basis of U?
none of them lie in $U$
A dense set
why not?
$U$ is spanned by $v_1,v_2$ Let $\alpha_1v_1+ \alpha_2v_2 =v_1+ v_3$, that would imply that $v_3$ lies in the span fo $v_1, v_2$ ,which is clearly not possible
A dense set
similarly $v_2+v_4$ can't either
A dense set
@twilit field Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question:Determine a base for this vector spaces a)
Can someone give me a hint or something like that ?
i thought of giving "random" values to x y and z such that i get 3 different vectors , since its R^3 i have at maximum 3 linear independent vectors , but since i am under some restrictions i can have less Linear independent vectors right ?
and then i will check for linear independence
but i think this is not the right process
giving random values is indeed pretty much never the right process
on the first one, you have the vector space defined by three equations in R3.
Your first step is to determine if the equations are redundant or not. Gauss method should help there.
For b and c, you have the linear space generated by 3 vectors. Since first and 2nd vectors are not proportional in either, they are independant. Check if the 3rd is dependant. If it is, the base is the 2 vectors. If it isnt, the base is the 3 vectors.
tyyy
I was a little bit confused about b) and c) cause i was like "If a vector space is generated by 3 vectors doesent that mean , that they form a basis" , but now that i said that outloud and with your text,i think that i got why , it means that at maximum it is generated by 3 linear independent vectors , but if some are linear dependent of each other that reduces the amount of vectors in the base right ?
My english is not the best i am sorry for that
no, they form a generating system
a generating system lets you get all the vectors of the space. A base is a generating system with the minimum amount of vectors, aka, all of them are linearly independant
to get a base from a generating system, you remove all the linearly dependant vectors
yeah exacly!!! maybe i didnt express my self quite well in the previous text , but thats the ideia i got
and btw in the first one i found out by the Gauss Method that the 2nd line and 3nd line are redudant equations
so that means that i can write the vector (-2,5,-3) as a linear combination of (2,-1,1) and (-2,3,-2) right ?
it might be a language issue, but only one of these is redundant. Assuming your next line is correct, the 3rd would be the redundant one
because you can write the third as a LC of the other two
your vector would be (-2, 5, -3) tho, btw
i am doing this on paper , sorry for my handwritting here "online"
thank you for helping btw
yeah sorry for that
(-2,5,-3) = (2,-1,1) + 2(-2,3,-2)
now it is correct
i think
.close
Closed by @chrome ibex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
which derivation is correct? the second one is the derivation my teacher used in her solution. she ignored the the digit in without x "x" in the product rule but in the third derivation she uses the digit without "x". so she made a mistake either in the first or third derivation.
Images are preferred over pdf
$f(x)=1+2x^2 e^{-0.1x}$
no 1+2x²
SWR
ir0nfly
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
why is there -1.2 ?
can you translate to eng?
this
it's an exponential function for bacteria growth in x minutes.
assignement a: how many bacteria are there after 10 minutes.
assignement b: when will there be most bacteria.
assignement c: when will be slowest growth
that's my progress so far. but my third derivation looks different than hers
i tried editing for better visibility. is that betterm
e^-0,1x
ohk
$f(x)=1+2x^2 e^{-0.1x}$
ir0nfly
yeah 1.2 is incorrect
$f'''(x) = -0.002x^2 + 0.12x + -0.8$ is correct
Wumpus Man
ok perfect thank you very much
@plucky atlas Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @plucky atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone know the electrical potential energy in electronvolts of an electron subjected to a potential of one volt?
surely 1
it's E = qV
yes sorry
V the potential
but you also agree that q of an electron is -1.6 * 10^-19 right
pourquoi E n'est pas égal à -1 du coup ?
why is E then not equal to -1
if the charge of the electron is negative
$E= q_{e-} * V$
Poposagrado
cause $W = -\Delta U$, work done is negative of change in potential energy
south's secret twin brother
work done by a conservative force is negative of dU/dr
so this is correct
it's the same reason that when you lift a weight you add potential energy to it
but how do i correct the formula
i dont understand the link with the work
potential is kQq/r i think
work done by pulling an charge q from infinitely far away to the point in the centre of the field
i dont understand
its negative because the forces opposes the motion, otherwise the charge would accelerate
U=1
q(e-) = -1.6 * 10^-19
E = (U * 1.6 * -10^-19)/ 1.6*10^-19
so E = -1
idk myself i was just saying that W = -delta U is correct
maybe it is something with the formula ?
E = | q * U| ?
does it still work for a proton for example ?
i guess it would
ok but the formula
E = q* U
@grim vector tu peux m'aider ou pas
stp 😢
<@&286206848099549185> anyone ?
@umbral scroll Has your question been resolved?
this is the relation between electric potential
and electrical potential energu
wait no
bro can you tell me what E and U are
i think they are the same thing
ateast have the same units
sory
E is the potential electric energy
and U is the potential (in Volts)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
<@&286206848099549185> ?
@umbral scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that the perpendicular bisectors of the sides of a triangle are concurrent.
what have you tried?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
hint -> || prove that the perpendicular bisectors meet at the circumcenter of the triangle ||
I think that is an axiom
Idts
No need to prove
suppose I didn't know that circumcentre existed
also we're not allowed coordinate geometry
use perpendicular bisector theorem
you can assume that there exists a circle passing through 3 points
a unique one at that
what you want to do is to let some points, call it O, be the intersection of two perpendicular bisectors
your goal is to prove the third perp bis also goes through O
it helps to draw a picture
yes, I also suggest that this link is helpful to prove the concurrency of the perpendicular bisectors of a triangle (has diagrams too): https://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/EMAT6680Fa07/O'Kelley/Assignment 4/Perpendicular Bisectors of a Triangle.html
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Find the area of shaded region
@last slate is your doubt still there?
hi
hi
This ur question?
wait what question is this
Look at the bottom triangle ..now that we have proved the congruency for all three triangles
We get all three sides are equal
Hence equilateral triangle
Interior angles are hence 60
U got it till now ?
Look at the congruent triangles
Is this any random triangle?
The question it is said perpendicular bisector of sides right ?
yes
Okay so what I did is I assumed a random triangle ABC ...and then took 2 triangles within triangle ABC to prove congruency
Konsa class hai yeh ?
but this would imply AB = AC which is not true for every triangle
man
the altitudes of a triangle don't bisect the sides..
and the medians are not perpendicular to the sides
you just proved it for an equilateral triangle
I would suggest go check the question
.
bro you assumed perpendicular bisectors pass from the vertex
which is not the case for any random triangle
any way you look at it you're assuming something that's not general to all triangles
yes
bhai tune hi question galat samjha h no offence
just intersect 2 of the bisectors
Kaise bhai
and then prove an altitude from that point to the third side is also an bisector
of that side
How can a side be bisected and perpendicular..if it is not from the opposite vertex
yeah this is the traditional proof i've seen for this
why should it?
the only time that happens is either for isosceles triangles on the non-equal side, or in an equilateral triangle
otherwise the perpendicular bisector of a side necessarily cannot pass through the opposite vertex
dekh bro, MN perp bis h but B se pass nhi kar rha
Oooh
sirph equi triangle mai vertex se pass karta h
you can conclude you've done something wrong when you get AB = AC
(aur iso mai ek perp bis pass karta h baaki dono nhi)
@last slate you can also prove this by proving that a point lies on the perpendicular bisector of a line segment if and only if the point is equidistant from both end points
be careful though, you need to prove both sides of the theorem
Consider F to be the point of intersection of any two perpendicular bisectors, say the bisectors of AB and BC.
(These two must intersect as AB and BC may not be parallel)
Then by the theorem above, F is equidistant to A and B, and F is equidistant to B and C. This means F is equidistant to A and C, which means F lies on the perpendicular bisector of AC, hence proving all three are concurrent at F.
Closed by @humble meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lads
i cant even begin solving this cursed limit
some context, b part
my work till now
i feel like there is alot of wrong here
@wanton vault Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wanton vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find out what t is equal to when A and B meet? i used trial and error to get my answer although im sure there is a much more efficient way
what's A's x-value as a function of time?
what's B's x-value as a function of time?
when will they be at the same x value?
Closed by @nova coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm doing this so wildly wrong
@tranquil lily Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil lily Has your question been resolved?
@help
<@&286206848099549185>
I keep trying to use cartesian / cooridnate geometry and I just get F is 0,0
Which it isn't but idk where I've gone wrong
Closed by @tranquil lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Hello can somebody help me with a difficult math equation?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so ive been trying to calcutate the farm value with this
and these are the numbers ive gotten Farmvalue = 30000 * (1.1) x (10000000) * (230000000000/300000000/13800000000000) * (1+6627000000/100) * (130-4)^0.25 * 13 * (300000000 (930000000000/230000000000) + 0.2 * 1 + 5670000000 * 0.6 + 0.25 * 2046000
ive tried doing them in multiple parts but i'm not sure if that's right, and even AI couldn't solve it
@echo heart Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @echo heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would you apply the divergence theorem here? because S isn't closed
we can say
(integral of side surfaces) + (integral of caps) = (volume integral)
Close it maybe?
TRUE
ah ok
so evaluate all but integral of side surfaces
tysm :)
.close
Closed by @frozen igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don’t know how to solve question 14
Translate?
We can construct a sequence of whole numbers by adding to each number, the double of the sum of the numbers composing it. (Look at the example). So how many numbers from the start that are less than 2025, let us get 2025 using this equation?
Yeah was just doing that
well the sum of 4 digits can't be more than 36
when the number is <2025 it can't be more than 28
so we only have to check from 2025-2*28 to 2025
that's still annoying, so the next step is to find another way to rule out numbers
Which is look at the value on each side mod 9
ok
um idk if its important
but if you look at the last digit of each origingal number, and compare it to the last digit of the new number, you can possibly conclude that you take the last digit, multiply it by two, then add it by 2 from its orginal form.
For example
1008 gives 1026 in the example
(8+2) + (8+2) = 26
and also
1002 -> 1008
which is (2*2)+(2+2) = 8
<@&286206848099549185>
anyone?/
<@&286206848099549185>
@fair plume Has your question been resolved?
@fair plume Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @fair plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
To solve this I suspect I have to find the values of $x$ for which $a^x-x$ has a solution.
\
To do so, we apply the intermediate value theorem, for $a>1$, it follows that for a sufficiently small value $a^x-x$ is negative, and for a suficiently large value , it's positive. It Thus follows that it has a solution
A dense set
why is a^x - x negative for small x
I thought IVT at first
but then I realised a^x>0 and -x>0
But for $a<1$ this argument works for $x>0$
A dense set
and there is trivially a solution for $a=1$
A dense set
so in Q18, $A(\theta)$ is the area of the triangle - the area of the arc?
A dense set
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve y < 3x - 4
5x - 2y > or equal 7
so true
LMAOOOOOOO
how do without graphign
it's actually relevant though!??
i get to use this once a month or so ehehe
how do you do it without grapghing
well y < 3x - 4 and y <= 5x/2 - 7/2
I guess try to imagine the graph lol
why would you not want to sketch it
i would say the graph would help you understand the solutions better
Closed by @vivid fjord
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Use quadratic formula
yeah it's not factorable
my question says find (y-2)^2 given that x-3y=5 and 2x-2y=y^2-5
,w x-3y=5 and 2x-2y=y^2-5
indeed your quadratic equation is correct
there should be a smarter way though
y^2 - 4y + 4
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ahh im so bad with sequences
dont even know where to start 💀
yeah so try using induction
the base case is $2 > 1$
south's secret twin brother
So an>an+1?
you want to prove that
@strange ravine Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @strange ravine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what's the pattern here on the denominators? are the next few terms like these for the denominators as follows 2^9×5, 2^10×7, 2^12×7 et cetera?
It looks like if numerator is odd = 2k + 1, the denominator = 2^(3k) * (2k-3)
If the numerator is even = 2k, the denominator is 2^(3k - 2) * (2k - 1)
@zealous dirge
Closed by @zealous dirge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185> pls help
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Okay
thnks
but yess u know i hadnt give proofs but i had proofs
m i correct?
what is even going on in this entire solution?
assigning a finite value
also by using ramanujans summation
in this thing u have circled using series simplified
wait, you learn zeta function regularization in class 8?
nope
@loud geyser wait pls take theta equals 45 degrees
i didnyt mentioned mistakenly
i get
pls take theta equals 45 degrees
actually trigonometry wasnt even studied
i studied maths myself
u know ramanujans summation i used that
here
i didnt use riemann zeta regularisation here
btw
does the question specifically tell you to solve with these methods? why are we overcomplicating the solution; this series diverges
ok
i got it
u know this q\a come to my mind
and i solve using these methods which i know
btw u r correct it diverges as bcz of its
coefficient is increases
@loud geyser but i m trying to give it a finite value
u know where this series can be seen and using its solution ? @loud geyser
@thorny remnant did u checked bro
Monkey
who??
Monkey
i didnt understand
Why tho?
i solve this by using this technique ik
yuppp riemann zeta regularisation??
when i solve it i didnt think its very much long
i dont know it as i dont studied it
Why do you have zeta regulisation in 8 grade bro?
bro we dont even studied trigonometric functions in ou school and i m in cbse boards trigonometry taught us in class 10th and i know this bcz of i had passion and wanted to know more about maths
thats why i dont much abhout it as i am studying myself
8th
yupp
they teach maths very slowly they covers topic which is best for average maths student but it bores me
Hm
i dont get it
woho self study i see
ya
How do you have cbse board? Aren't they in 10 and 12 classes
aiming for any competetive exam ?
they had but i m in 8th grade and cant go to other grades
i had just passion for maths
Ok...
Anyway can't help you im in medical
💀
Holduo
Are you doing this from a book?
i just want synopsis of elementary results in pure and applied mathematics but cant get as i get less marks
Or maybe a reference sheet
Ahhh
r u indian
Yuh
naah
i also
haha thought so
nope even i have sometimes borrow books from my frnds who have his siblings in iitjee prep
u r from pcm or pcb
pls can u check it
i had borrow trigonometry book of cengage and studying it
woahh thats gud
all in that pdf just check that
and i come to know that i had to get some patience for studying inverse trigonometry
using that series which i had mentioned
take theta = 45 degrees
yupp ramanujans summation i used here
woah bro that is not used till pre university
im not sure about it
idk about university
ohhk.
but u will get iit for sure
u get in pdf
yea my goal is nit suratkal tho
i had mentioned the concept of 0th dimension in last page and wrorks on pi has been given also
jee mains u r prep
i dont know that
arithmetic geometric progression
i told u that i m studying myself
i have listened
you have to divide sum by 2 and subtract by initial sum while shifting the first term in sum/2 giving infinte sum Geometric progression use that to solve
i dont know where to start and end as i have any book for studying
how can i go i havent any book to prep and
i get less marks in all subjects and thats why this is happeing i cant see
i dont know but when studying in pdf i dont get what it says
but i m studying synopsis book through pdf
yupp i like that always
ohh
i can barely see that bcz my mom only says to watch and study my own class
ah too bad
even i m studying from vmc online as a online student but they are teaching sst and english today
and other i cant
pls check works on pi also
highscool boards arent much useful btw
like my 10th percentage barely mattered
just fees concession
sure
yupp but who can tell my family
haha real
you know that moderation in 10th and 12th boards
pi=3.14 wasnt it?
yess
where u see
in ur pdf
this is multiplied with the other series i mean this is multiplicand
and giving 3.14
yea yea thought so
but how do yk that tho?
i doubt 10% in my class students might know that
that series notaion i had used?
when i see ramanujans magnificient value for pi i saw that there
see
i didnt get what r u saying
ooh
idk
about those results
used in infinite
contiuned fraction
also most of it
lol
ohh
np
@flint trellis can u just tell me aboout differential and integral calculus and other types of calculus like multivariable calculus for me
i will grateful to u
wait I'll tell that in direct msg
kk
umm add me
accept
have u checked bro
bot is broken
ooh what should i do?
dont panic
kk
@cunning dragon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to rewrite this equation $y(t) = 1.11 + 0.441 \ln(t)$ into a form like $y(t) = A(1 - e^{-at})$
ahtrader
@bright grail Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bright grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I integrated (ax+b)² by substitution and got (ax+b)³/3a
Which becomes [(ax)³ +3b²(ax) +3(ax)²b +b³]/3a
Then I integrated (ax+b)² by expansion and got a²x³/3 + b²x + abx²
Then I multiplied a/a with it to have a similar form like the substitution method then I have
[(ax)²+ 3b²(ax) + 3(ax)²b]/3a
These two are not equivalent b³ is missing from the expansion method can someone help me
Hey can I add b³ in it from myself to factor it into (ax+b)³
yes
Thank you 🙏
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brisk salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
how do we decide the limits
find where they intersect
so that means a cos theta = 0
or theta = pi/2
yeah and then you have to see which function is closer to the origin
but like idek what the graph looks like
so you can figure out which function is on 'top'
😭
but then sec theta is 1/(cos theta) and cos theta is positive in that region
so sec theta is also positive
ah I think they are assuming a > 0 then
wait
ah so thats why a(sec theta+ cos theta) is upper limit?
yeah when a > 0 at least, this is bigger than a sec theta
okk
ah it's cause -2 sec x = 2 cos(x + pi)
anyway it turns out that this is true for all a not just a > 0
how do i get an idea of what the graph looks like
bcz the solution says its 2xintegral
but if i didnt know what it looked like i wouldnt know that its 2x
it's hard to know the graph unless you plot points and join them up
ah
no just integrate normally
$\frac{1}{2} [a^2 (\sec^2 t + \cos^2 t) - a^2 \sec^2 t ]$
south's secret twin brother
then id just end up doing this
this integral
without 2*
how do i know to do the 2*
oh wait right sorry yeah I see what you mean now
yeah so the asymptotes bit, basically you have to realise that both curves are even functions w.r.t theta
so yeah theta is not only pi/2 but it can be -pi/2
o ok
so we are integrating over an even interval, -pi/2 to pi/2 in the outer integral
and so halve it and multiply by 2
no worries!
Closed by @hexed elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So we first try to find the nullity of this linear map
$BA=A \implies B^kA^k =A^k \implies O=A^k$
now what
A dense set(Ping when reply)
We pre-multiply both sides by $B^{k-1}$, such that $B^k$ is $O$, so $O= AB^{k-1}$
A dense set(Ping when reply)
is that first implication right
no
which is why I switched to this
It's B^(k-1) A because it's noncommutative
Or at least, not far enough
Cause this = 0 is useful, it tells you im(A) subset Ker(B^(k-1)), but that's not {0} so you can hardly deduce A = 0
You lost information about A because B is not invertible
yeah
Instead, consider the equation in A
M = BA-A = (B-I)A
Is there a solution for all M?
Yes
Why?
Yeah I just rewrote the question, just in an elementwise, equationistic version
this is where you take a leap of faith and blithely use the geometric series formula 
That's not the simplest way
$BA=A$, we know that $B=I$ satisfies this equation
A dense set(Ping when reply)
Consider L(A) = (B-I)A
We want it to be surjective, i.e. to be invertible
What would that entail?
But B is fixed
input dim = output dim, which is why I used surj <=> inv
I recommend reviewing your linalg basics if you doubt that
We were never taught that
Well, the issue is I don't know null space is 0
rank nullity implies that
that's assuming it's surjective
which it must be
Yeah we're making you prove under the assumption that input dim = output dim
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What should be the solution to this problem?
The limit doesn't exist or -pi/4?
is that the greatest integer function?
it seems like it is vidveshana abhichara😭
no idea what to accept
then the answer should be limit does not exist
because when you approach from the left hand side of limit you get arctan(-1) which is -π/4
and from the right hand side you get π/2
it is not pi/2
1/0 is not defined
approaches infinity
but it is in floor function
so it will be exact 0
approaches infinity so arctan approaches π/2
if you say so then sure... but the limit still won't exist
the sided limits differ anyway
The limit from LHS will be -pi/4, no?
yeah
it is simple
when you approach the limit from the left you get a different answer than from the right
and the limit from RHS doesnt exist
so the overall limit doesnt exist
yes sir
,w lim x to 0 of arctan(1/floor(x))
Yeah
erm okay ig
my teacher told that it will be -pi/4
but wolfram alpha disagrees that's why I asked
But I still can't wrap my head around that my teacher could be incorrect in maths😭
but he was talking about the both
you too
Closed by @fallen aurora
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just need help understanding the process to solve the questions
given that the figure is a parallelogram, what relationships can you draw between the angles?
opposite angles are congruent
yes. can you express that as equations?
for DEFC maybe /_D=/_F and/_E=/_C
Im not sure do you mean like the DC = 180 degrees
yes, so how could we express that as an equation?
/_D + /_C = 180degrees?
Yea 110
@shy knoll Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @shy knoll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please, help me
Two blocks of masses m1 = 200 g and m2 = 600 g lie on a smooth table, connected by a light inextensible thread. A horizontal force equal to 4 N is applied to the second block, directed horizontally to the right. a) With what acceleration will the bars move? b) What will be the tension in the thread? c) What will be the tension force of the thread if you apply a force to the first block and direct it to the left?
.close
Closed by @full obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to find the equations of the asymptotes of the graph of f(x). I wrote cosh() and sinh(x) in terms of the e^x version, but i don't know how to continue. I know I have to take the limit of x to infinity of the function to find a horizontal asymptote, but i also don't really know how to compute that
@daring lark Has your question been resolved?
@daring lark Has your question been resolved?
Hello 👋🏽 , could you show your work?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Only using introduction/elimination rules?
yes
@stone shoal Has your question been resolved?
@stone shoal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Not sure how to start
probably you have some idea for (a) and (b)
Sooo apparently
Someone told me that
Domain is R^3
And co domain is R^2
How do I do c)
The problem has gave you the definition of T, just insert the numbers in.
In the right matrix?
How do I do d)
write it out a system of 2 linear equations, and solve the system
RREF?
sure
And the augmented side will be -3, 21?
