#help-49
1 messages · Page 102 of 1
i drew a figure and got two cases
can you show them
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
write conditions for a and check for triangles
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
hi
@last slate I would say 2
To see how just draw the larger side
And from one end a circle of radius equal to shorter side
(depends on the angle and which side it is opposite to but mostly 2)
Yes
two intersections
OK
.close
Closed by @humble meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
we may form a condition for which the ASS holds true
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
can anybody help me
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Sure
there number 2
dude why do you keep opening new channels
so the 2nd one for example, 12 is the number of digits after the decimal point
100 = 1 * 10^2, 2 zeroes after the 1, for example
so after you write down 0543, that's 4 digits
you need 8 more zeroes
what
which part didn't you understand?
2.0543 * 10^12 = 2.0543 * 10^4 * 10^8 = 20543 * 10^8 = 2054300000000
1.2345x 10^4
using the same logic, 2345 has 4 digits
but the 4 in 10^4 means we have 4 digits after the decimal point
so just 12345
we've used up all our digits
Just shift decimal places dude
shift the dot to right n times if it's 10^n
yeah
add 0 if theres no other digits
if it positive i understand
and left if it's 10^(-n)
but it negetive
then shift it to left
ah so when it's negative, you shift the decimal point left
if you can't shift the decimal point any more, just write down zeroes
can u give me an exaple
4.5 * 10^(-10) on your sheet for example
shift decimal point once to the left, so 0.45 * 10^(-9)
0.12
check how many digits there are after the dot, 2 in this case
you can write it down as 12 * 10^-2
then we need to write down 9 more zeroes to the left of the 4
so it
they need to convert scientific form to a regular number
0.00000000045
yep
yeah well just reverse the process
that's what they're having trouble with
it helps if you count out loud actually
so the 1.2345 the negetive one
every time you move the decimal point, or write down a zero, you add 1 to your total
will be
try it yourself!
12 * 10^-2
add a 0 and a dot
0.
then check the n of 10^-n (in this case 10^-2 so n is 2)
and make it so there are 2 digits after the zero, if the number is not enough to create 2 digits just put zeros before it
0.00004234
or you could check by shifting the decimal point 5 to the right and see if you get back 4.234
314159 * 10^-9
if i wrote 0.314159 it would be 6 digits after the zero so im just putting zeros before it for it to be 9 digits after the zero
0.000314159
for negatives you can count the digit count after the dot
2 * 10^-15 should have 15 digits after the "0."
for 2 * 10^(-15) you have an extra zero
there should be 14 zeroes then a 2
to make 15 digits in total
(excluding the starting 0)
what
so 0, then 14 0s, then a 2
but if i cahnge the o to 2 ill be only 14
yes and the last 2 makes the 15th digit
count the digits that come after "0."
0.1 is 10^(-1) for example
0.01 is 10^(-2)
it matches up with the digits after the starting 0
so what the anser to ur exp
is there anything else wrong
otherwise the rest look all correct
ok thank you
the one where u answered $1.32\times10^{11}$ is not quite right
Duh Hello
yeah I didn't count wrongly I'm pretty sure
it's 1.32 * 10^15
it was in a previous picture
not 32
oh jesus
here
no that's the same one
yea it 1.23
wait oh
oh
converting scientific to standard requires attention so make sure to not miss anything when counting
oh ok
counting bundles of 3 makes it easier imo
any positive integer (except 1) can be written as a product of prime numbers
example
what uve done is right
yeah
do i repeat number 2
repeat until its not divisible by 2
then move to the next prime number
example if its 230
230 / 2
115 / 2 -> cannot be divided with 2 so you move to the next prime number that it can be divided with
1 + 1 + 5 = 7 not divisible by 3 so you move to the next prime which is 5
360 is 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3 * 5, which makes it have prime factors 2, 3 and 5
fastest way is to find the product closest to the sqrt. for example 10*12 for 120 instead of doing 2*60, but doesnt really matter much. ull get the correct answer either way and going up the list of smallest primes is the most systematic
true but these don't really look like high school questions so i think it's better to follow just what teacher taught in this case
im solving
guys
37 divided by what
that is a prime number
heh
so 37 dive by it self?
treat 37 exactly the same way u do with any other prime
u could fine a nicer way to write it 
the thing is that the niceest
well i mean that instead of circling everything you just write
a) 120=2*2*3*2*5
b) 640=...
c) 2520=...
d) ...
below the question
what u have is right but there is some value in making things look readable for your teacher. but anyways its a small point, but worth giving a thought before you write down your answers
i gotta get on to doing my own stuff tho. gl with the rest
ok
ok
product of shared prime factors gives you gcf
Hello! Just want to point out that your answer for #4 letter d is not correct ‘cause I just double checked it by multiplying the factors you wrote and they’re not equal to 3,330
waht
then idk tbh
that my anser and i cannot find another way
here
my caculations
did you see 37 as 3 and 7?
Yes lol😭😭
Sorry 😭
it's correct don't worry
ok
oh
Yes, 6 should be your answer for that first question
also to check if the answer you found is correct, you can divide both of the numbers with the gcf you found
resulting numbers will be relatively prime if the answer you found is correct
72/18 = 4
90/18 = 5
in math consecutive positive integers are always relatively prime => 4 and 5 are relatively prime
are they correct
yes
basically dividing them by the answer you found should result in relatively prime numbers
the concept of relatively prime numbers is important for GCF
For question 5a , they are only asking for common factors of those pair of numbers , not all of the factors !
What you wrote is right but it’s only the first step to find the answers. those are not the final answers
the answers for question 5a should only be : 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12
oh
From the lists of factors you made for 24 and 36, you just have to look at the factors that are on both lists
Closed by @smoky meadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question: There are 5 red balls, 8 black balls and 4 blue balls in a box. If two balls
are drawn randomly, what is the probability that the first ball is not red?
My approach (supposedly wrong):
Case 1: None of the balls are red, so I have to pick two balls from the non-red balls (12)
P = 12C2/17C2
Case 2: The second ball is red, hence the first ball can be either black or blue
P' = (8C1 * 5C1 + 4C1 * 5C1)/17C2
Hence, the desired probability = P + P' = 63/68
Can anyone please tell me what went wrong here and what is the correct approach to
solve this problem?
isn't it just 12/17 * 16/16 = 12/17
,w (12 choose 2)/(17 choose 2) + (40 + 20)/(17 choose 2)
your approach looks fine though
is the answer 12/17 or 63/68?
mine looks kinda off ;-;
63/68 is a bit too large ig
yeah seems like you need to divide (8C1 * 5C1 + 4C1 * 5C1) by 2
thanks a lot
no worries!
cause if you compare with (8 * 5 + 4 * 5)/(17 * 16), that's a factor of 1/2 smaller
yeah cause in 17C2 you are assuming the order doesn't matter
when clearly it does: the first ball can't be red
@rare sluice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
gusy can anyone help me with this question, im stuck on solving
what have you tried thus far
is that sqrt(2) * x or sqrt(2x)
i think its sqrt(2) * x, not sqrt(2x), similarly with sqrt(3)*x
it looks like your x value is correct tbh, the question might be wrong
so the question is wrong?
bad typesetting imo
yeah I get it now
@ruby moat Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ruby moat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @keen slate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is equivalent to stating if for all integers more than 1 if $n \nmid p \forall n \in [2, \sqrt{p}]$ then p is prime
A dense set
The contrapositive would be if $p$ is composite, then there exists n in $[2, \sqrt{p}]$ st $n \mid p$
A dense set
right so far?
yes
We attempt to prove the contrapositive, which is if $p$ is composite, then there exists n in $[2, \sqrt{p}]$ st $n \mid p$
\
As $p$ is composite, it has at least 3 factors. Let the factors be $a_1,a_2,\dots p$.
\
It also follows that $4 \leq n^2 \leq p$
A dense set
I have to show such an exists such that $ \exists n \in [ 2, \sqrt{p}] \implies n \mid p$
right
given that p is composite
Let there not exist an $n$ in $[2,\sqrt{p}]$ such that this is satisfied. Then $p= nq+ r ; 0< r<n$
A dense set
I'm lost
you are overthinking
p being composite means that p=ab for some 1<a,b<n
can they both be bigger than sqrtp?
why not
yes
then their product would be greater than p
yes
Cool
thanks
one question
Formally, this is if $p \in \Z \land p>1 \land n \nmid p \forall n \in [2 , \sqrt{p}$ then $p$ is prime
A dense set
so the contrapsoitive would be if $p$ is composite , then $ p \in \Z \lor p\leq 1 \lor \exists n \in [2, \sqrt{p}] st n\mid p$
A dense set
p in Z, p>1 is the given setup, you dont include it in the part to form the contrapositive of
the statement is $\forall n\in [2,\sqrt p] n\nmid p \implies p \text{ prime}$
Denascite
the contrapositive is $p \text{ composite} \implies \exists n\in[2,\sqrt p]: n\mid p$
Denascite
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\lim_{x\to0} \frac{e^{-1/x^2}}{x^3}$
Good
Tried e ln, but didn’t get 0
do you know lhopital
Oh, lopital for 1/(ex^5)?
Didn’t work, tried it earlier.
how
Will this work?
No, you can’t combine the exponents like that
After applying, (-3/x^4)/(-2/x^3 * e^-1/x^2)
Using exponent x^2
So you get rid of -1/x^2
keep the exponents in their place
don’t flip it and do lhopital. if u flip it, the derivative x^(-3) won’t go to a constant number
My bad, forgot denominator.
-3x^-{4}
dont flip the x part, simplify, then apply lhopital again
also that should be e^(1/x^2)
$\frac{e^{-1/x^2}}{x^3} = \frac{1}{e^{1/x^2} x^3}$
Nacho Boi
do u see why those powers can’t be combined?
oh they combined them, i was wondering how they got x^5
yes
Wait, is $D[a^{f(x)}]=f’(x)a^xlna$?
Good
it would be $a^{f(x)} \ln a f’(x)$
Nacho Boi
bc of chain rule
let u = f(x), then $D[a^u, x] = a^u \ln a \frac{\mathrm du}{\mathrm dx}$
Yeah, after first time using lopital (1/x)/(e^(1/x^2))
Nacho Boi
Forget constants
it’ll be easier if you don’t flip the fraction because you want at least one of the individual f(x) to go away ie. approach a constant. x^-3 won’t
x^3 will
So lopital this?
L’Hopital this so that there is a function on top and on bottom
[(2/x^3)e^(-1/x^2)]/(3x^2)
Then combine the x?
you could do that yes
but it will make the lhopital never end in a sense
bc then you’ll have a x^5 on the bottom which is further from a constant than x^2
double check that derivative
but then yes u will do it once more
remember also that $D[f(x)g(x)] = f’(x)g(x) + g’(x)f(x)$
Nacho Boi
for the numerator
Isn’t it using the rule for fraction?
Numerator is a fraction.
the quotient rule? since it’s e^(-x^2) you could do quotient rule instead here but product rule will also work
I got this using quotient rule
$4e^{(-1/x^2)} (1-x^2)/(9x)$
Nacho Boi
$4e^{(-1/x^2)} \frac{1-x^2}{9x}$
Good
this is still slightly off, also the derivative of the denominator is wrong, d/dx 3x^2 ≠ 9x
yes
Closed by @alpine gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello am i right on the answer being b here
yep 👍
thank you
Yes
B is the correct answer
@rough breach Has your question been resolved?
This is how you solve the given formula for x :
yepp thank you and this would be d right?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Yes it is correct
thanks
@rough breach Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rough breach
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you use this factoring method for complex, like how you would for reals
or can you only use the quadratic formula
ur using it with real numbers anyways
a and b are real
factoring and quadratic formula are equivalent
ok
or -i
certainly this is not the only answer
if w is a square root of z, then so is -w
well that's wrong
Does sqrt here mean principal root?
yes
Meaning argument < pi?
I think sqrtroot has principal of -pi/2<sqrt(argz)<=pi/2?
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
this was the question I had yesterday
Im not sure how to compare its polar form
ill redo and send a picture
I don’t get it
honestly
im just gonna move on
how is this equation false?
they explain it right there
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I dont understand how my solution is wrong, because 2e^(ipi) is -2, and pi is ok because it’s -pi < arg(z) <= pi which satisfies principal branch
@obtuse totem Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @obtuse totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the expression is cyclic
so if you replace $a \mapsto b, b \mapsto c, c \mapsto a$, you get the same thing
south's secret twin brother
ohhhh so its like pretending they are the same thing?
yeah it's the principle of substitution
rightttt
you can let a, b, c be whatever since they are variables
for example, you can substitute $y \mapsto -y$ to get an expression for $\cos(x - y)$ if you know $\cos(x + y)$
south's secret twin brother
no worries!
Closed by @calm quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i f $f(x)=x^3$, find $f'(x^2)$
A dense set
Now I do know that I can simply derive the chain rule
but that involves treating the derivative as a fraction, which I don't particularly like
U don’t need chain rule for this?

Is that wrong?
I mean what’s f’(x) first off?
3x^2
Okay so what’s f’(x^2) in that case?
$2xf'(x^2)$
A dense set
?
So $6x^5$
A dense set
No
x becomes x^2
f’ is a function
I know
I know
the notation is a bit confusing, but i would interpret that as [ \left. \odv fx \right|_{x^2} ] rather than [ \odv f{(x^2)} ]
cloud
so just $3x^4$
A dense set
Yeah
Yes
That feels wrong
f’ by convention is f’(x)
pretty sure they're saying if g(x)=f(x^2), find g'(x)
f'(x) is just a function like f(x)
Or with the notation cloud used
if we were to write out the chain rule you could say
(f(2x))' = f'(2x) * (2x)'
so this comes out to an intermediate step in the chain rule
Inherently I think the prime notation is actually less confusing, as x here is just a dummy variable and should not matter
Lol, just read the footnote, spivak expected readers to make exactly this mistake
This becomes more evident once you deal with partial derivatives imo, as the fraction notation can be severely misleading
Which mistake?
If you’re careful about how to think about functions this is not ambiguous at all
treating f'(x^2) as (f(x^2))'
Oh right
Yeah so one way to see why they’re different is to write it as a composition
I see why they're different now
Nice, in essence the difference is this
f’(x^2) is just f’(x) composed with x^2
while (f(x^2))’ is (f o g)’(x) where g(x) = x^2
Got it
Now I'd like to prove the followinf
$g(x) = f(x+c) \implies g'(x)=f'(x+c)$
A dense set
We start by finding the derivative of $g(x)$, which is defined to be $\lim_{ h \to 0} \frac{g(x+h) - g(x)}{h}$. We also notice that the derivative of $f(x+c)$is defined as follows : $\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{. f(x+c+h) - f(x+c)}{h}$.
\
If the derivatives are indeed equal , it follows that $\lim_{h\to 0}( \frac{g(x+h) - g(x)}{h}- \frac{. f(x+c+h) - f(x+c)}{h})=0$
\
We now ask the reader to notice that, by definition, $g(x+h)=f(x+c+h)$ and $g(x)=f(x+c)$
\
it thus follows that we have $\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{0}{h}=0$
\
This concludes our proof
A dense set
Is this fine?
That substitution you speak of at the end could of been done in the very first step or two
@twilit field Has your question been resolved?
Hmm, okay
Do I also have to prove that if g(x) is differentiable, then f(x+c) is differentiable
I mean by assumption they’re equal to each other for all x, so if either is differentiable the other must be too
You don’t really need to bother thinking about they’re if differentiable or not. Their limit will be the same if it exits
And it’s just by substituting the thing you said at the end
A dense set
I've done this before, but I'd like to do it again
By definition $g'(x)= \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}$.
\
We also have $f'(cx) = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(c(x+ \frac{h}{c})) - f(cx)}{c\frac{h}{c}}$
What am I doing wrong here
A dense set
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help finding the value of the following expression
ren
A is a symmetric matrix (A^T = A)
note that this is essentially just the higher-dimensional analogue of the generalized gaussian integral
I mean it doesn’t need to converge as a start
Even in that case
why not?
Pick A = 0
Then pick b so that it doesn’t converge in a trivial way
such that A is a symmetric matrix not equal to 0I or -bI
What’s the XY to this problem
Well I mean again this need not converge
what now
diagonalize, split it up into several integrals. then you can also see whether those converge which will tell you whether the original one does
Couldn't you factor x and then have x(Ax+b) = (Ax+b)x ?
that
doesn't help much
yeah but i wanna figure it out for a general integral
could you explain if it's not too tiresome
Right I mean yeah
explain what part of it
i was gonna say all of it, but imma try it myself and let you know if i get stuck
yes, then sup y=R^Tx
then write out how the exponent looks in terms of the y_i
D is diagonal, so that is chill
(why is it chill?)
you will see
uhm
for convenience it wouldnt hurt to just look at the x^TAx term for now and ignore the rest
hang on i really need to revise my LA
??
well just so you dont have to write down the rest when that doesnt change for now
Maybe alt. it’s possibly useful to write A as the corresponding polynomials of projections 
wut
explain
hmmmm
Like from the spectral theorem you can write A as a sum of projections with its eightvalues as coefficient, but maybe that’s not useful 
Then nvm
really just a restatement of the fact that A is diagonalizable
Yeah
also you mean eigenvalues?
sub y=R^Tx
Oops yea lol
ren
we get exp(-y * Dy - b * Ry)
get rid of that x in b*x
if y=R^Tx, then x=... ?
Ry
and now this is just a quadratic in y, awesome
unless i'm tripping
never mind, i'm tripping
it was quadratic in x before and we did a linear sub, so not terribly surprising
*facepalm*
now write out y^T D y
?
in terms of y_i
yeah but i don't have the columns of D
eigenvalues of A, ik
open paint, draw D
starts at i=1 but yes
o typo
ren
exp( -(that sum) - b*Ry)
yes
so we can deal with the sum later
now for b*Ry
i gtg somewhere rn, thanks for all the help denascite! :D
really appreciate it
.close
Closed by @sinful trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need to check if im doing this part of my review right
hi
This one is 180 degrees about the origin
This would be good if ur reflecting across y axis
Almost there
oh? what do i need to change
whats wrong with it? (explain pls)
One of the points is wrong, when you’re reflecting across the y axis, each point becomes (-x,y)
is it point (8,2)?
What is (8,2)
oops sorry i meant (8,-2)
I think you are looking at the wrong image.
What MoonCaik said seems to be in regards to the first image (reflection across the y axis), not the second image
I’m not sure what you’re talking about 😭
There is no point at (6, 4)
dude
sorry i keep hitting the wrong keys, theyre right next to eachother
i meant (5,3) 😭
this one
(5, 3) is in the correct location.
It is the reflection of the point (-5, 3)
So the wrong one is one of the other two points.
If you reflect points across the y-axis, the y value stays the same and the x value gets inverted.
So a point (x, y) reflected across the y-axis would be at (-x, y).
A point (-5, 3) reflected across the y-axis would be at (5, 3)
With that in mind, look at the points you have been given and see if the points you put in are at the correct locations.
so would it be (3,-2),(3,-8),(5,3)?
sorry if im not picking this up right, math isnt my strongest subject
No worries.
The given triangle is the Grey one, right?
Try just writing down which points make up that triangle first.
Almost.
You took (-x, -y) for the last two points instead of (-x, y)
The y value stays the same for that
That's correct!
For the other one you actually reflected it across the y-axis
If that was the task, it would have been correct, but the task says to "rotate 180° around the origin"
The origin is the point (0, 0)
What you need to do is imagine you put a pin into that point and rotate the entire graph like that.
But because it is 180°, you can do something easier.
Because it is rotated 180°, the new points are basically (-x, -y)
(-3,8),(-8,-2),(0,-6) so those would turn into (-3,-8),(-8,-2),(0,-6)?
(i found writing out the points given helpful lol
Not really.
You just put a - in front of every number.
But if you have a negative number to begin with, it would turn positive
ohh so it switches
It's (-x, -y), so if you insert the values x = -3 and y = 8 for example it would be
(- (-3), - (8))
. - (-3) is the same as positive 3 and - (8) is negative 8, so the point (-3, 8) would be (3, -8)
That looks correct to me
ahh
alright, thats all though
thanks for the help. I understand it better now
WAIT
i have one more if thats ok
I'm glad to be able to help
Sure
i sent it
That also looks correct
If that's all, you can close it
.close
Closed by @solid pilot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find he intervals over which the graph of f is concave upward or concave downward
i dont understand how its increasing from (0, infinity)
when the critical point is -2
and not 0?
your function is only defined for x >= 0
finding the domain of f
try calculating $(-2)^{5/4}$
kaue
for which values of x does f(x) make sense
in particular you'll find that x^(1/4), the fourth root of x, is pretty difficult to obtain with a negative number x...
i know its undefined if f is less than 0 but
shouldn't we able to find it analytically??
not if f is less than 0, if x is less than 0
oops yea
find what analytically?
the conditions for f to be defined is "everything that appears is well defined"
so x^(1/4) has to be defined
condition for even root to be well defined: x >= 0
same for x^(5/4) = (x^5)^(1/4)
x^5 >= 0
or x >= 0
soo
everytime theres like a fraction as the exponent
x has to be greater or equal to 0 ??
if the denominator of the fractional exponent is even
x^(1/3) = cube root of x has no limitations in domain
(-1)^(1/3) = -1 is defined
etc...
Closed by @glossy compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
haha this is cool
Yeah how
Inf
Yeah
1
limit n*pi/(n+1)
no
it's just pi times this
so the limit is pi
so the whole thing is cos(pi)
Steel
@twin kernel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I want to find the surface area of a circle of equation:
you guys are too noob, this is litteraly very ez
OK
then what, ik that this equation contains a
all real numbers
no imaginary part
then I can't, move on
@tight pagoda then help
the answer of module of z at power 2 + module of z + 8 + (z + z ) +zz =8
is
z=0
dummy
it's8 × (z+z )
dummy
@tight pagoda you speechless
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @faint nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@mossy glade u there
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that ( f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} ) is continuous if and only if for every ( X \subset \mathbb{R} ), it holds that ( f(\overline{X}) \subset \overline{f(X)} ), where ( \overline{X} ) is the closure of ( X ).
Halex
Let ( y \in f(\overline{X}) ), then there exists ( a \in \overline{X} ) such that ( f(a) = y ). Since ( a \in \overline{X} ), we have that there exists a sequence ( x_n \in X ) such that ( \lim_{n \to \infty} x_n = a ); this and the fact that (f) is continuous implie that ( \lim_{n \to \infty} f(x_n) = f(a) = y ) and thus ( y \in \overline{f(X)} ).
Halex
Is this right
@meager ore Has your question been resolved?
@meager ore Has your question been resolved?
looks right for one direction
thx, kinda stuck in the other direction
might be easier to use the topological definition of continuous
what is that definition?
Oh if you didn't learn it then don't use it
@meager ore Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know how to do long division but i keep getting the wrong answer with like triple fractions
try showing your work so far, maybe theres a small calculations mistake
ok ill write it out on paint rq
yk what i think i figured it out
i forgot minus negative is addition
maybe i should use paint to double check my work
.close
Closed by @autumn fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
okay ahahah
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Show that $f(x)=\frac{1}{x^3} e^{-1/x^2}$ is differentiable at x = 0
Good
So I'm just suppose to take limit of $\lim_{x\to0}f'(x)$?
Good
Not exactly
What are the conditions that say a function is continuous at a point?
There are 2
I just came up with continuity.
? Sorry, could you repeat that?
What do you mean by "came up with continuity"?
Oh wait, my definition is stupid
yes sorry
I meant
Oh, I thought you asked what conditionss for differentiable.
Yeah that's what I meant to say
mb
What are the conditions that say a function is **differentiable **at a point?
That the functions is continuous and monoton?
Monoton?
Strictly increasing/decreasing.
Not particulary... at least, not how I 'm interpreting it
From what I know, it needs to be continous and smooth
pardon my spelling
Alright, how will this help?
is it undefined at 0?
there is 1/0
This is the function, where first expression is defined $x \neq 0$ and second is defined $x=0$.
Good
Will that help?
Okay...
yes
We need to make sure that the limit at x -> 0 is the same as f(0)
for continuity
Yes, I did lim f(0), it was 0.
okay, that's good
so we know it's continuous
now we need to prove that the slope is smooth
do you have an idea on how we might approach this?
Not at all.
hint: we have derivatives
okay
Well, what if teh derivative going towards is the same as the derivative after?
would that make it smooth?
Yeah, I tried it, but after first time lhopital, it became a big fraction.
okay
We shouldn't need lhopital here
but let's derive the $x^{-3}\cdot e^{-x^{-2}}$
Oreo
I made it into exponents so we don't have to do like quotient rule and that fun jazz
Yeah, I got the derivate as $e^{-1/x^2} \frac{2-3x^2}{x^6}$
Good
uhhhhh
let me derive it for a sec
one min
So in a blob
I got
$-3x^{-4}\cdot e^{-x^{-2}}+x^{-3}\cdot e^{-x^{-2}}\cdot-2x^{-3}$
Oreo
So let me simplify that
Yeah...
i don't think I got hte same thing as you
could you show your work?
$$\frac{\frac{2}{x^3}e^{-1/x^2} x^3-e^{-1/x^2}3x^2}{x^6}$$ using quotient rule
Good
Oh god
Did I made a mistake?
Let me look over it
So
from what I can see
we derive the e^{-1/x^2} first
and multiply that by x^3
so does $\dfrac{d}{dx}[e^{-1/x^2}]=\dfrac{2}{x^3}\cdot e^{-1/x^2}$?
Oreo
Yeah, isn't it?
$D[-1/x^2]=-1\cdot -2 \cdot 1/x^3$
Good
oh yes
sorry, I'm a bit frazzled
okay
and the second one is right
huh
do we need lhopital?
Yeah no, I did it already, and the answer would be $lim_{u\to0} \frac{12}{e^{1/u}}$ where $u=x^2$
Good
.close
Closed by @alpine gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you take the slopes of complex cartesian points, and the negative reciprocals will show the two line segments are perpendicular?
cause dot product for sure works
but just wondering if negative reciprocal also works
yes, in general, 2 lines are perp if ab = -1, where a and b are their slopes
if u can show one is a scalar multiple and rotated by 90 degrees of the other it also works
ie, if a, b are complex numbers
and a = i * k * b
perfect! thanks
where k is a scalar that is non zero
then it also works
actually negative reciprocal should work even for complex numbers
lmao cause I just did that on an exam but all of my friends used dot product
the fact that its C doesnt really matter, since C is isomorphic to R^2
Closed by @obtuse totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone please help me with a differential equation problem?
if only it were possible to read
because your handwriting is illegible
<@&268886789983436800>
type .close on its own
@dim pilot Has your question been resolved?
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
