#help-49
1 messages · Page 96 of 1
no
what's the limit as x -> -1 of (x^2-1)/(x+1)
-2?
it existing?
That is one
So if x=d
First condition is f(d) exist
Second condition is the limit of f(x) as this approaches to d exists
And the third condition is that f(d) = lim x->d of f(x)
Do these conditions hold for yoir exercise at x=-1
As you can see, as x approaches to -1, f(x) approaches to -2
No because at f(-1)
The function is defined to be -2
ohh
i get it now
i thoight there was a jump discontinuity
causing it to be discontinuous
If that were true
Then the third condition would not have hold
Cause the limit could not be equal to f(d)
@winged wedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Looking for help with a math question, not even really sure where to start. My teacher talked about how to find domain, but none of here examples were anywhere near as complicated as this one
What difficulties do you see?
What happens when t=2?
What happens when t=-1/2?
@ancient dragon
hi Samuel
@ancient dragon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a sylow p group of say 2^2
does it mean we have a group that is Z4 or does it just mean we have a group of order 2^2
but we are not sure of the structure
i believe its the later. just after i wrote out this example..
do anyone know why no one is coming to help in my channel its been like 20mins
A (p)-group is just a group of order (p^k) for some (k). A Sylow (p)-\textbf{sub}group is a maximal (p)-subgroup
Invariance
there's no such thing as a "Sylow 2-group" on its own
it's Sylow because it's a subgroup
and a Sylow 2-group of order 4 can be any group of order 4
Closed by @worthy kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
is my work right so far
i boxed where i left off
is cm^3 to m^3 valid thing to do
you can convert between cm^3 and m^3
hi, i am brazilian (so sorry if I write something wrong because I'm not fluent in English) and i don`t no if this server help with problemes like this "A car manufacturer announced that it offers its customers more than 1,000 different car configurations, varying the model, engine, options and color of the vehicle. Currently, it offers 7 car models with 2 types of engines: 1.0 and 1.6. Regarding options, there are 3 possible choices: multimedia center, alloy wheels and leather seats, with the customer being able to choose to include one, two, three or none of the available options.
To be faithful to the disclosure made, the minimum number of colors that the automaker must make available to its customers is
" i don`t understood anything please help me.
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
okk
@naive flint Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
pls help I'm not entirely sure what to do
uh
im jsut gonna give you the conversions
1N = 10^5 dynes
and 1m = 100cm
so just plug that in
ohhh I see thanks
@mortal blaze Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think I just proved the opposite of what the question asks 😭
if x < 0 then 0 < e^x < 1
but then if y=-1/1-e^x, and if 0<e^x<1, then y would be a negative number
the last line is wrong, y = -1/(e^x-1) does not simplify to -1/(1-e^x)
oh wait why 😭
you multiplied the denominator but not the numerator by -1
OH
wait omg thank you
🙏
I think I got it then
thank you so much I didn't catch that 😭
.close
Closed by @dusty stream
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no 😩 just plug in this y now
and verify that it works
girl I'm so sorry I was confused but I figured it out now 😭
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wait i need help on this again bc i skipped doing it earlier since it would take too long
okay so i know the derivative when x is positive is 1
for the numerator
and then the bottom its just 1/2(2-x^2)^-0.5(-2x)
Then use quotient rule
am i doing anything wrong
i did it like twice and i got diff answers than the answer key 😭
126
oh that one again
bacc
bacc
wait how idd it become x^2
x*x
but you are evaluating f'(1) right
yeah
hmm
bacc
no we can do this
1+1
divided by 1
so 2
funny thing is
even without the x^2 but only x you should have gotten the same answer
answer key says the function is y=2x-1
function?
yeah
find equation of the tangent line
OHHH
Now it goes through the point (1,1)
bro im actually slow
i thought it was the equation 😭
it's always so happy
😂
bacc
nice
@vast bone Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vast bone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did i do 1a and 1b correctly?
@lofty cedar Has your question been resolved?
@lofty cedar Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
yeah?
bruh shut up
<@&268886789983436800> troll
bro got the wrong role
please don’t post off-topic messages in someone else’s help channel.
<@&268886789983436800> spammer
@lofty cedar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wow
using the ln or the root as dv it still is a huge expression
is there any method easier to do it?
after the u-substitution ax + b, this becomes an integration by parts problem
well, i thought i could use 1/(ax+b)^1/2
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sand talon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Whats the probability of neither a or b when: P(a) = 0.01, P(b) = 0.5?
are they independent?
Should I use: 1 - p(a and b)
not really, that would be the probability of not a or not b
you seem to want not a AND not b
could just be miscommunication though
yep
also, you really don't need to specify that the or isn't exclusive. That's pretty much the default assumption when it comes to or
Closed by @fleet flume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quik notation q: if I have f(t) = M * (dv/dt) - ie newtons second law - and I wanted to represent integrating both sides on interval (-inf, t] for some t>0, should I swap the variables inside to something else (e.g. tau)?
followup, after I integrate say $ \int^{t}_{-\infty} \frac{dv}{d\tau} d\tau$, should I write the result as $v(\tau)$?
jack
no, the tau gets integrated out and the result will be v(t) because t is in the bounds
Closed by @dense bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no, presumably the problem asks you to solve for x and “4x = -5” does not answer that
Makes sense
Thanks!
.close
Closed by @amber island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
what
4 cancels out on the left
and on the right, if you divide by 4 as well?
-1.25
-1.25 as a fraction is -1 1/4
"-1 1/4" is a bit misleading
it deserves at least some parentheses
"-(1 1/4)" would cut it
wdym?
x = -5/4
not this
1 1/4 and 5/4 are the same thing
1 1/4 = 4/4 + 1/4 = 5/4
-(1 1/4) = -5/4
if i put 1 1/4 on a test that would be correct?
with parentheses and a minus sign it COULD work
but definitely pick this way of writing fractions
over this one
im still so confused
how do I get this way
how did you get 1 1/4 in the first place?
from the decimal
well
divide by 4
hey, whats hey
$\frac{4x}{4} = \frac{-5}{4}$
rafilou2003
so $x = \frac{-5}{4}$
rafilou2003
BECAUSE RHE 4 CANCELS
answer is -5/4
we have 5 left
so
-5/4
wooo
praying i get into honors geometry
gonna be easy
thanks guys
@amber island Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
by the segment addition postulate, GE + EO = GO, and EO + OM = EM, by substitution, GO = EM
Thanks
@last slate could you possibly help guide me on another one
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
im sorry
what does the 2nd line say
angle 2 and angle 3 form a vertical angle
do you mean angle 3 and angle 4
Yeah sorry 😅
idk
what i would do would be to use the correspondign angles converse to prove that the two lines are parallel
then by the correspodning angles theorem angle 2 is congreunt to angle 4
Ok
One last one sorry
i cant see it
@fading shadow Has your question been resolved?
@fading shadow Has your question been resolved?
@fading shadow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I start number 20
conjugate
Oh okay
I forgot sorry
Can someone check if I did this right
oh wait nvm
solved
.close
Closed by @cold plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Wat have you tried?
Ok so what do u know about an open dot on a number line like that
it dosent include that number
equal to ones
Ok so if u were to turn this into an equality what do you think it’ll look like give it an attempt
No so u would have to include an absolute value sign
On the x
It would be
5 < |x|
Sure
Ok good
Now
When ur solving an absolute value
There’s going to be 2 answers for x
oh yes case 1 case 2
So first answer u can solve for just by solving normally
So pretend the absolute value wasn’t there and solve through
-5 and 5?
No no
Do this
Just solve normally one time
U should get just one answer
And say whole thing like t> 29 or whatever
What did u get
No ur good but u need to put those two separately and u forgot the x
So lemme show u the work
Ok u see what I did
In the first way I kept everything as positive
And solved through
I understood the way 1 at the beginning but way 2 stumps me
I get what you did though
Yeah so that’s the case because absolute values have 2 answers that will work
Yeah and u have to make it negative
And do u see what u did with the sign
The arrow point
I flipped it
Do you know why
I remember the teacher talking about why but I forgot
It’s because when u multiply it divide by a negative across an inequality
The sign switches
Doesn’t matter if it’s an equal to one or not
oh ua
But it’s only switching if u MULTIPLY or DIVIDE
U can add and subtract however u want
Just switches if u do these by a NEGATIVE specifically
Hope that makes sense
Ok so u have these two answers
away from eachother?
How would u say them verbally
Yes but u have to know why
the signs are different
The first one is said “x is GREATER than or equal to -5”
And second one is said “x is LESS than or equal to -9”
So it’ll be numbers -5 AND all numbers bigger than it
ok
While second one is -9 and all numbers LESS than it
ohhh
Another hack is to just go the way the tail is pointing of the inequality sign
If it’s pointing left go left
Closed by @remote owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If (\sum a_n) is absolutely convergent and (\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = 0), show that
[
c_n = \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k b_{n-k} \to 0
]
Halex
as a_n is absolutely convergent, lim |a_n| = 0
|b_n| >= 1 only finitely many n
why is that?
but would't that mean that |b_n| < 1?
eventually yea
🤔 how can that help me prove c_n converges to 0?
sorry that wasn't right
(deleted)
say that for all i >= N, |b_i| < 1. say you choose a large n. the first N terms can be made arbitrarily small (by picking a large enough n) because lim a_n = 0. then the rest of the terms are bounded in abs value by sum |a_n|
now this isn't very helpful
but
if you pick a small epsilon and then say that for all i >= N, |b_i| < epsilon
then...?
@meager ore Has your question been resolved?
also do you have a simpler proof
? that wasn't as helpful as i initially thought because we need to prove that c_n converges to 0, not just converges
this problem looked easier from the very start haha
c_n can be bounded by a constant + sum_n a_n
This is part of that constant
@meager ore Has your question been resolved?
hm this is incorrect but i'm not going to bother editing again
i think it was right at some point in the past
fix $\varepsilon_1>0$. since $\lim_{n\to\infty} b_n = 0$, there exists $N$ such that for all $i \geq N$, $|b_i| < \varepsilon_1$.
to write this in long form to make it easier, for every $n$ we have $$c_n = a_1 b_{n-1} + a_2 b_{n-2} + a_3 b_{n-3} + .. + a_{n-1} b_{1} + a_n b_{0}.$$
we can pick $n$ so large that
$$|a_1 b_{n-1}| + |a_2 b_{n-2}| + .. + |a_{n-N} b_{N}| < \varepsilon_1 \sum |a_n|.$$
now fix $\varepsilon_2 > 0$. since $\lim_{n\to\infty} a_n = 0$, we can also pick $n$ so large that
$$|a_{n-N+1} b_{N-1}| + ... + |a_n b_{0}| < \varepsilon_2 \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} |b_n|$$
layla is not harper
that is my edit
"also pick n" might sound a little sus because the N from earlier depends on n
but it's ok. the same N will work for a larger n
you wouldn't write the proof like this. but it's an idea
well it pretty much is the proof, other than some details not being proven
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
chemistry :(
you're given some directions under the FEEDBACK, check that thing
maybe you'll find the problem
@green grail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help so bad I got to -root 7, 4- root 7, -4 root 7, and 8 as the remainder but idk how to write the answer
What method did you use? Long division?
Also if you can show your work that would be better
I will try to understand
That's your r(x)
(x²+(4-√7)....) is q(x)
Ohhh
What is this then
Well if your remainder is 8 then r(x) will be 8
This is q(x)
Remainder in term of x, but you don't have x term in remainder
So it will simply be 8
Suppose you had 2x+3/x
So it would have been x * 2 +3
3 would have been r(x) in this case
2 as q(x)

@brisk crag Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brisk crag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
,rotate
Help please
@graceful ferry Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
you want to find another linear combination of those vectors that gives 0, other than the null 0+0+...+0 combination
so suppose you did have one
so $\lambda_1,...,\lambda_6$ being those coefficients, not all of them being 0
rafilou2003
start by showing that it's impossible for $\lambda_1 = 0$
rafilou2003
and then without loss of generality, you can assume $\lambda_1 = 1$
rafilou2003
(just divide by lambda_1 if it's not the case)
then find the values of the other coefficients...
Why ?
I also don't understand why we are multiplying the vectors by lambdas when i need to find the values for alpha
Do you know what it means for a group of vectors to be linearly dependent?
Can you please tell me i'm not sure actually
Theres many different definitions just sayimg the same thing
so a group of vectors is linearly dependent if
there exists a linear combination of those vectors that gives the 0 vector
and not every coefficient in that linear combination is 0
for example, the group of vectors ${\vec 0,u,v}$ is linearly dependent because $1\cdot \vec 0 + 0\cdot u + 0\cdot v = \vec 0$
rafilou2003
Okay
so
IF this group were to be linearly dependent
there would exist such coefficients
such that lambda1 * (1+alphax) + lambda2 * (x+alphax^2) + ... = 0
now our objective is
supposing that they do exist
what would they be, and what value (or values) of alpha allows that?
so this is what I recommend first
and then assuming lambda1 = 1 will simplify your computations
@graceful ferry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@visual swan Has your question been resolved?
its ez
I dont know how to do it
i got my two equations for the second one
8v+9b=228
4v+5b=124
so you did the first one but can't do the second?
what is the problem according to you?
It's simultaneous equations right?
I think so
yeah, he just needs to link stuff up and take out values, but let him figure it out himself
so I am multiplying the bottom equation by negative two
and I now got -8v-10b=-248
8v+9b=228
hm
and now I know I got b=20
if you are confident, then you can add those 2 to seprate v out
maybe subtract both equation like 8v+9b-(4v+5b)=228-124
is that right?
so where are you stuck then?
I am not sure how to find v my teacher said there is a fast way but I forgot it.
that will work also
use elimination mehod
Substitution is my go to method for system of equations
Elimination might worj
Work*
but it can get legthy
Ehhhhh
try elimination first
well, if your problem was to find the right method, apply it and see if you can finish up
yeah im putting it back into the equation right now
8v + 9b = 228
4v + 5b = 124
4v = 124 - 5b (choose the simpler one first)
v = 31 - 5b/4 (remember this equation for later)
put v in the first equation
8(31 - 5b/4) + 9b = 228
243 - 10b + 9b = 228
243 - 228 = b
b = 15
now use the equation i mentioned before. you do not have to start from beginning for v.
v = 31 - 5b/4
v = 31 - 5*15/4
ok, i think i did a mistake. i am getting a decimal: 12.25
@visual swan Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @visual swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, i am trying to come up with a way to calculate pi and so far I've succeeded but i have a few questions
İ tried to Turn f(n-h) 's into just N's doing some kind of substitution but i am not sure if i can even do that according to limits
and another question is
whenever i try to put in sqrt(1-x²) in place
the answer is always wrong
At least according to the way i made c# calculate it
and another thing is
i tried to use this formula as a means of getting the length of a function over a range but Wolfram alpha doesn't evaluate this
integrals of f(x) minus f(x)(1-h)
Integral with respect to what variable
f is meant to be any function, I'm trying to find the length of functions over a period
but it's supposed to be the area of f(x) minus almost itself but not
which is supposed to give a line
why doesn't it work?
@pine vine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do this
,calc 3 - 13
Result:
-10


It happens to everyone sometimes 
True
.close
Closed by @tight jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
🫵
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ig so
for me
maybe i'm wrong
id factor first
oh
okay ill try that first
i factored it and got (rt2 - 1)(rt3 + 1)
so the conjugate is
(1 - rt2) and (-1 - rt3) ?
what about the rt6
will that stay positive
or negative
honestly i'm lost id better shut up 😭
$(\sqrt{6} + \sqrt{2} + 1) - \sqrt{3}$ Therefore conjugate is $(\sqrt{6} + \sqrt{2} + 1) + \sqrt{3}$
sorry u cant really factor
icannotdoanymorecauchy
wait how did you get that
you sure it's $+1$ instead of $-1$?
cause $\sqrt{3} \sqrt{2} - \sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2} - 1 = (\sqrt{3} + 1)(\sqrt{2} - 1)$
higher's secret brother
yeah i made a mistake there
wow
so how did you get this?
ignore that
this is easier to do
the conjugates are $(\sqrt{3} - 1)(\sqrt{2}+1)$
icannotdoanymorecauchy
${(a-b)(a+b) = a^2 - b^2}$
icannotdoanymorecauchy
also delete your messages
@buoyant prism Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @buoyant prism
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone know what to study for a test to go to algebra 1? The test is mostly on pre-algebra. But I was doing math 7 last year. So I don't know any Big part in pre-algebra that I have to study well? The test ( kind of similar to final exam) is tomorrow. So I am studying right now. Any kind of help is appreciated.
Nobody here would know your specific region and school district. Just go watch Khan academy algebra 1 lessons
the organic chemistry tutor is a great youtuber as well
do you not have a syllabus?
and now I am on math 8
my guy we won't know the specifics of your curriculum
And I want to go to algebra 1 and I will do a test tmr
you must have been provided with a syllabus
ask yo teacher bruh
Yo how the hell is my teacher suppose to know I asked her twice
she's supposed to know because she's your teacher?
She doesnt make the questions or do the test
she is just teaching math 8
surprise, nobody here does either
go study yourself and come back when you work on a concrete math problem and you get stuck
Closed by @lethal hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you do this question? It wants me to find T and V but I can’t get the answer I think I did something wrong while plugging in the values but I don’t know what
@novel gyro Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @novel gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I use the degree rules to evaluate the limit as this function approaches infinity?
I'm specifically referring to this rule:
The numerator isn't visble
Degree of e^x ?
the numerator is 2e^x
Specifically I've never been exposed to degrees that are other than the form ax^n + bx^n
You can factor and use propreties calculate the limit
So that rule only works with polynomials which have variables?
Yes, with polynomials you can do this
But it doesn't say much about the limit value
Just that its converging or not
ahh i see
I'm assuming in this case I would have to now just factor out e^x from the top and bottom?
and then directly evaluate the limit as x approaches infinity?
Indeed
You're welcome
.close
Closed by @keen solstice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I use the degree rules for evaluating functions as x approaches infinity for this: t^(1/3)+12t-2t^2
I first rewrote the function in standard form: -2t^2+12t+t^(1/3) then I applied the rules and got infinity
Theres no denominator?
Then its -ve infinity
how though?
I thought the degree of the numerator was greater than the degree of the denominator, thus causing it to be infinity?
Yes and the degree of the denomnitor is 0
what's causing it to be -ve infinity?
so in addition to that rule, if the coefficient of the largest degree is negative, the answer is negative?
Yes
Thinking of it like this
(Infinity)^2 is greater than Infinity
So we if subtract (Infinity)^2 we'll get a negative answer
With polynomials, the limit value will be the limit of the greatest monomial (the terms with the biggest power)
Since its -2t^2
t^2 goes to +infty
Multiply by -2 and you get a negative infinity
Think about derivatives definition if you deals with 0/0 form
With sqrt you can sometimes use conjugates
I haven't learned derivs yet lol
Ah then you good to go with factorisation and basic rules for now
The degree rule say nothing about the sign of the infinity
So yeah
Just a method to know whether diverging or converging function
so if this was approaching -infinity instead of infinity, it would still be -infinity, correct?
^^^ this is just in response to what u said here
Yes
(You could have do it by factor out the t^2 from the whole expression and use proprety)
It would have lead to same result
Its a parabola in fact
So yeah it goes down both sides
@keen solstice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
conjugate
show your work
well i’m looking at your final answer and seeing something wrong immediately
did you just get green or did you have the not very people role?
I think just now
what do you mean by this
how is the denominator 90?
the denominator should be a difference of two squares: 36-(-81)
from the conjugate
how did you get 81
yep
how’d you get 72i?
standard form so yeah
it’s standard to write it in a+bi though
@lapis fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need desperate physics help
This spool is attached to hung from the wall
The only information thats given is the mass of the spool, and g. Using that, I am to calculate the normal force, and the tension in the cable. But really all I need help with is the tension.
Normal force exists because of spools horizontal part doesn't it?
Yes
but the issue is calculating tension
You know the angle, can't you just create a 30-60-90 triangle
I thought about doing that, but I wouldn't be able to find any of the sides since the part of the cable connected to the spool is not directly above the middle of the spool.
That makes me uncomfortable too yeah
i just dont even know where to really begin
it doesn't really matter where the cable is attached for the purpose of calculating the force exerted by the cable.. all we need to know is that the tension in the cable is in the same direction as the cable itself
but how does that help determine the magnitude
if the magnitude is T, then one of the components should be T*sin(theta) and the other should be T*cos(theta) for the appropriate directions and an appropriately chosen theta
Understood, but figuring out the value of T is the problem at hand
well if you balance forces, T should be the only unknown in one of the directions
In the x direction theres the normal force and the x-component of T
in the y direction there is gravity, friction, and the y component of T
the only one I've been able to calculate is gravity by just doing mass(g)
I'd say friction is 0 if there is no limit how much spool can lift
That doesn't make sense either since one of the things the question is asking for is also the coefficient of friction
I simplified that by saying im just attempting to compute the normal force, because after that its easy
well the torques from the spool and friction would also have to cancel
But to go about calculating the torque, id also need to figure out where the spool is connected to the cable relative to A since its not directly above
it would have to be tangent to the circle / perpendicular to the position vector
position vector?
ahh
i think i see
so your making a relative coordinate system rotated 60 degrees from where it normally is
I'm lost on finding the torque due to gravity with that model tough
gravity has to come from the center of mass
any vector pointing directly to or from the center must exert 0 torque
then what torque is balancing out the torque from tension
well normal force is a similar story
so the only other force exerting torque is friction
but I'm not given friction
well it's also perpendicular
friction points straight up, the line pointing from the center to the point of contact is horizontal
I dont see how I can find that torque without the magnitude of friction
you can find the torque exerted by both forces in terms of their magnitudes
I see that, but those very magnitudes is what im trying to find
3 equations & 3 unknowns at this point
its asking for coefficient of friction, and tension
but really they go hand in hand
so just tension
the torques have to be equal right
yes
torque of gravity is 0
but how do i find the torque from the other forces?
okay so the force of tension upward has to be equal to the force of gravity
but i dont know where to start for even finding tension
i'd have to do something like
cos(60)T to find the vertical component
but I dont have T
friction only creating torque right
yes
but the only thing im given is the weight and that angle
and the measurements of the spool
yeah so just assume the friction is only creating a torque
then you can find tension
i think i see
wait
but id need the magnitude of either of the 2 torques
to figure out tension
oh i’m finding it without using torque
just force in the y direction
but honestly idk if that would work
ive tried that
it doesnt
aaa
its okay
i think
ive spent enough time on this problem for tghe day
maybe i should talk to my prof lol
it’s a good problem
Closed by @hushed glen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys help
4x^2/y^8
i dont want the answer i wanna know how to do it
i have a test and i dont wanna fail
you need to review your algebra rules
i know how to do i just dont know where to start
cmon bruh
Cross out 3x^3from both numerator and denominator. Move y^-1and y^-5to the denominator, flip the sign in their exponent, giving:
4x^2/y^5y^2y^1 = 4x^2/y^(5+2+1) = 4x^2/y^8
@grave whale Has your question been resolved?
ty!