#help-49
1 messages · Page 87 of 1
yes
exactly
so 1 = root x^2 +y^2
or
OG
OH
hold on so
if i do
ln(re^i theta)
then the real part is ln(r) and the imaginatry is (e^i theta)?
omg wait is this like the log rule where if you multiply something inside the log u add it outside
then the i comes out
OHH
ok its coming together lol
tysm
.close
Closed by @heavy lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone please explain this
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
.close
Closed by @heavy lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let n(x) = x^2 - 4. The average rate of change of n(x) over the interval [c, 5] is equal to 3, where c is a constant. Find the value of c.
my work:
(n(5)-n(c))/(5-c) = 3
(21-n(c))/(5-c) = 3
21-n(c) = 3(5-c)
21-n(c) = 15 - 3c
-n(c) = -6-3c
n(c) = 3c + 6
@mystic salmon Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
you can use n(x) to find n(c) in terms of c and then solve the quadratic to find c
yeah i tried that while i was waiting
and it simplified to
c^2 -3c-10 = 0
which i solved and got c=5, c=-2
can't be 5 bc other side of interval is 5
so has to be -2
but i don't get how it can be -2
oh... lemme check
I'll try it my way to see if i can get c=-2 too
oh nevermind i got it
when i was trying to see if the slope between (-2, 0) and (5, 21) worked, i was using a slope of 1/3 instead of 3
ok ty for clarifying
cheers!
Closed by @mystic salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you too
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi isnt this supposed to be 4sinxcosx?
Cause there was already a 2
So sin2x is 2sinxcosx
yes
Closed by @tardy patrol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Which is the odd one out"
all of them seem to be polygons except a certain shape...?
B???
yea
Well, google regular polygon and you get C as odd one
circle isn't a polygon though?
it is as n goes to infinity
I must say What a profound question of math 
This question was ffom our school exam
U take the exam to get accepted to the school
dude that looks like a elementary school question though
fair
It is
Nvm u dont get the sarcasm 
Its for 6-7th graders
People going to 7th
yea I can see that too
A group theorist might say the answer is C
just realized that this sounds aggressive, i didn't mean that lmfao

Is the answer b??
(cries in passing uni but failing 6th grade)
I mean, it can just be A for not properly aligning with the another answer. I kinda hate this kind of question.
Should be c since rest of the shapes are symmetrical
Or rather -c
My friend said d cuz all other shapes are 360 degrees 😭😭😭😭😭
the person who designed the question might as well have ocd and consider C as the answer for not being neat-looking
LOL
😭
I mean that ain't wrong either
Yeah so it might b A for not having a reason 🥶
was thinking that only
your safest option is still probably b though
Case 1 should be circle since it has infinite sides
Case 2 should be trapizium since it's not symmetrical
Case 3 should be triangle cause it's the only figure with angle sum 180
Case 4 should be triangle because it is placed a little above (misprint)
Case 5 should be A because it's the only one not being noted down in any of the 4 cases
What is a trapizium? And i actually didnt know circles had infinite sides we didnt leadn that 😭
it must be a millennium problem
(because most likely they want you to be thinking about geometry, and polygons are, well, a huge chunk of geometry)
Trapizium is quadrilateral with atleast 2 of the sides being parallel
Case 6 should be circle since it's the only implicit curve here

what language is this by the way?
Kurdish
Oh
Thanks
Letters and writing looks really similar to arabif
arabic
they have like 20 of the same letters
I think
yeah I figured it's kurdish but was surprised they were allowing the language on exams
didn't mean to get political on a math server though
Wdym?
wdym allowing the language on exams
😭
sent u a dm, if anyone else is reading this sorry that this got off topic 
Thanks for the help everyone
gonna report this and then u will get banned and then u won't be able to get math help ul fail uni and then ul go into depression and then commit suicide

What's the final answer 
my career is over
Idk i wouldve chosen B
LOL
Indeed it is
U mean -B
ima be using this server alot starting in sep
LMAO
its js like that cuz like our writing is the opposite way of english's writing
english left to right ours is right to left
they usually put abcd in our language too idk why they did it in english this time
ohh
@timber tartan Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im rlly bad at these types of qs where i gotta use trial and error
cuz i dont rlly know where to actually start
Well if you use the smallest denomination, 3, to get to 8, you also need 5, and if you add another 3 you can get to 11 as well.
Now to cover the rest (9,10,11), you only need an additional 4.
(unless it's a trick question and you just buy 9+3 to get 12 which covers 12 and everything under)
ohh so 3+5+3+4 so 15
was thinking this asw
but it means exact values
this is such a simple quick method, starting from the lowest and working to eac hvalue thanks
.close
Closed by @timber arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The question also kinda proves it works because it certainly cannot be 12 (any combination that only gets to 12 can't also get to all the other ones), and the next choice is 15, which works
.close
Closed by @shell wigeon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Other channel closed due to inactivity so Im asking this again
How did they guess T(n) = O(n) here
I asked other ppl from my class and they arent sure either
Idek what the recursion tree would look like for something like this
saying floor(n/2)+1 is approximately n/2, using the recursion you would have T(n) = n + n/2 + n/4 + ...
so I should draw the recursion tree for T(n/2) + n?
how did you get this
also if I do this then the work done each layer would be just n right?
or would it be 1
Im getting O(n log n)
coz we have log_2(n) layers and work done on each layer is n
so n log_2(n) = O(n log n)
it's not n on each layer
T(n/k) is not n + ...
I dont get it
what do u mean by this
you have log_2(n) layers sure
but the value of T on each layer changes
it's not n+n+...+n log_2(n) times
but arent we making one recursive call each time?
so I thought the work done each layer would be the same too
?
say we start with T(n)
right
then we write it as T(n/2) + n (oversimplifying the recursion in T)
then T(n/4) + n/2 + n
then T(n/8) + n/4 + n/2 + n
each recursive call you make, you make it on a smaller and smaller number
up to k-1 but yes
so now I pick k = log_2(n)
oh ye
so what would I do after this
i suggest n = 2^k - 1
n + n/2 + n/4 + n/8 + ...
what does this look like
idk
approximately n?
oh geometric series?
n/(1-1/2) = n/(1/2) = 2n
and now I can ignore the 2 so I get O(n) ?
so if we had floor(n/2) + 100000
it would still be the same
right
the constant inside wont make a diff
wdym
if the recursion is T(n) = T(n/2) + constant
now each layer adds the same "computation time"
For a large enough initialisation, i would say yes probably
Also one more question. This was from my midterm and this is how I was doing it. I dont understand the issue with T(floor(n/4) + 1) + n/2 + n here
am I not expanding it in a similiar way as u did
well all of the remarks are in there
as I said I was oversimplifying T(n) recursion
I wrote it as T(n/2) + n instead of T(floor(n/2)+1) + n to avoid some problems
your question was how to get the intuition
but thats allowed right? i just wanna be sure incase something like this pops up on my exam tmr
if you wanna prove it formally, show it for some form of n that actually consistently simplifies floor(n/2)+1
here you gotta use n = 2^k -1
that's what I would do
or could I just do all of that somewhere else to get the correct guess and instead just do what my prof did here
coz you dont have to show how you got the guess when doing questions like these right
yeah there is nothing wrong with tweaking the question a bit to get the correct intuition
but for formal proofs you gotta be as rigorous as can be
Im gonna be honest I still dont understand where exactly Im suppose to plug this n + how you got n = 2^k - 1
well the teacher uses a different method of "we have the guess, so prove it by strong induction"
that should be fine too right
@real pivot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @real pivot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help with this pls
@drifting root Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Just my thought
You could apply the law of cosine
And get two expression with cos(theta) and r
Then you should be able to find the r by solving them
?
ohhh
i see your vision
Sure
Do you have the answer
If so, I might give it a shot to do the calculation
ans is 20
ye it works
thanks mate
No problem
i think ill wait to see what the dude is typing tho lmao
Call angle PAB by θ.
Cosines rule on PAB gives us-
4h²=16h²+90²-8h•90cos(θ)
Cosines rule on APC-
9h²=16h²+120²-8h•120cos(θ)
These are two equations with variables cos(θ) and h.
From the first one we get-
cos(θ)=(3/2)h+90
Substituting into the second equation we get-
9h²=16h²+120²-8h•120((3/2)h+90)
Which is a quadratic you can solve for
He seems to got a big brain plan
i just set for cos instead of subbing in
dealing with expanding is a pain lol
thanks for the help
.close
Closed by @drifting root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
question c
I started with the coefficent matrix
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1& -1&2&1\
1 & 2 & -1&1&1\
2&3&-1&2&1\
4&5&-2&5&2\
\end{bmatrix}$
f(why am i here )= I don't know
Then $R_3-2R_1$
f(why am i here )= I don't know
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1& -1&2&1\
1 & 2 & -1&1&1\
0&1&1&0&-1\
4&5&-2&5&2\
\end{bmatrix}$
f(why am i here )= I don't know
After a few more operations, I arrived at
$\begin{bmatrix}
1&1&1&1&1\
0&1&1&-1&0\
0&0&0&1&-1\
0&1&-6&1&-2\
\end{bmatrix}$
f(why am i here )= I don't know
f(why am i here )= I don't know
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i guess bro just needed a space to work
I didn't think of something 
I wrote down all my steps
but didn't think of interchanging a few columns
we dont normally do that
we only exchange rows..
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the reflection of $e^x$ about $x=2$
f(why am i here )= I don't know
so this basically means f(x)=g(4-x) intutively
But how would I solve this more rigourously
Like I'm not sure how to explain myself
but what I know is that the graph should be a reflection so it will be $e^{-(x +a)}$
f(why am i here )= I don't know
f(why am i here )= I don't know
,w graph e^x and e^{-(x-4)} from 0 to 4
f(why am i here )= I don't know
and a plane mirror at x=2
I have to find the equation giving it's reflection ( Of the virstual image)
It is.
But that was based off pure intution.
I was hoping for a more conceptual approach
Again, just a hint, please
Wait, do you have an alt on this server.
👍
OK, let me think a bit more then
OOh
I can think of this in this manner.
Now I know that $e^x$'s reflection is $e^{-x}$
f(why am i here )= I don't know
now I want the reflection about x=2
So, I shift the origin
Now, I want e^{-(2-a)}=e^2$ at x=2
that gives me a=4

Thanks !
.coose
i think u messed it up bud
I have another question
Find the reflection of e^x about y=4
-e^x +a =e^x
so a=4
oh
right
I thought it was $-e^x - 8$ for some reason
f(why am i here )= I don't know
,w graph $y=-e^x and y=-e^x+8 from 0 to ln(4)
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is physics related but this part of it is more maths how do you figure out the proportionality of two different things? I never really got the hang of it
related formulas
you don't need to know what they mean but since star 2 has 2x the lifetime of star 1
how does that effect it's proportionality?
is it really 1/2*(star1)^3?
what does the k stand for here
A number
ah, so since the lifetime is 2T
I assume move 2 to the other side
so it's 1/(2*M^3)
oh make m the subject
M=cuberoot(k/T)
right?
but what is k in this specific situation
An unknown constant
You can call it "constant of proportionality" if you wish, I don't care
ah
We don't know its value because it's not given, all thats given is a proportionality relation
Anyway
Yes
Now these M and T are for the first star
We want M_2, and we know T_2 = 2T
We know it's the same k
So same formula
M_2=cuberoot(k/(2T))
Now since you don't know T, you need to use M (or rather M_1) instead
u huh...
What would be M_2/M_1?
cuberoot(k/(2T))/cuberoot(k/T)
Yes that's not T_2
That's M_2/M_1
,calc 2.250 * 0.7937
Result:
1.785825
Yeah, I guess it's 4 significant digits
The question says "approximately" anyway...
yea lol
how did you know to put Mass 2 over mass 1 btw?
why not mass 1 over mass 2?
That doesn't matter
or equate them via equations

going to quickly review this then close
If you want to check your results, a question to ask yourself is whether it makes sense that M_2 is less than M_1, and also that it's more than half of M_1
Closed by @waxen silo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
You don't have to, it just comes from the given proportionality relation
Closed by @waxen silo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain me what is a unison sign
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
how does it look like i mean
U mean union
$\cup$
BoiledAnchovies
Intersection
yes
$\cap$
Skill_Issue
Closed by @frigid turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what have you tried?
this is fun problem
i tried saying smth about the midpoints in each side
but like
you cant really say the diagonals intersect at where the midpoint lines intersect right
so im stuck
try writing in terms of vectors what u said
in order to show that the diagonals bisect eachother
is to show that u+v/2
and u-v/2 in that diagram are the same location
but since u-v/2 does not start from the origin
aka A
you need to add something to it to make it start from the origin
uhhh idk what this add smth is, but can i just say DC=AB in a parallelogram and for the other side too
also, how does this work
to bisect is to say that it splits it in two
which means that the intersection of the two has to happen at u+v/2
and u-v/2
if u-v/2 were to start from A
yes
or am i getting smth terribly mistaken
o
lol
i get that part now
i just have a hard time actually proving it
You want to show that (u-v)/2 if it were to start from A instead of where it starts now is the same vector as (u+v)/2
In other words
the intersection of the diagonals
is where some multiple of the diagonals is equal
apart from the fact that again u-v does not start from the origin A
and so needs to be translated to the correct starting point
first
ok wait a sec
lemme
absorb
if i say that those are equal, arent i saying that AP = DP?
no
that would be saying the lengths are equal
what you want to say is that the vectors are the same
you want to say
if i go from the origin
along u+v
for some time
i will come across u-v
at some multiple of u+v
a(u+v)
and if i go along u-v
etc etc
v + b(u-v)
that make any sense?
this is gonna take a while and lot of repetitive q from me sorry
so
for no reason at all
i thought |u+v|=|u-v|
but theyre vectors
so theyre not equal
but if this were a rectangle or smth, then it would be equal?
and this is why i got it mixed up with (u+v)/2 and |(u-v)/2|
a square
this thing
if im travelling down u+v, and suddenly half way i come across u-v where its 1/2 way, its bisecting
oh youre right
so back to this
it doesnt start from a, so how can we still say theyre equal
look back at the drawing you made
you start at A
and you want to go along u-v
towards the intersection\
without lifting your finger/pen or whatever
woundt that make it go off the drawing?
like
down
what do you mean
Take u
and add -v to it
and draw a line from A to that point
the direction of that vector is from D to B
oh shit i wrote this wrong
whoops
okok
so working back from what we wanna prove
once we say that theyre equal cause AP, AP, and we say theyre 1/2 each other, theyre bsiecting
this sisnt even working backwards idk why i said that
so how do we start proving this now?
a(u+v)
v + b(u-v)
by showing that when these are equal a and b are both 1/2
a(u+v) is the red line
and v + b(u-v) is the orange line
i forgot where the v+ came from sorry
in order to start travelling along u-v
you first have to travel along the entirely of v
so to get to P
ah
icic
so v + b(u-v)
yes
that's the idea
when they are equal it means you're at the intersection of u+v and u-v
why does it feel illegal?
wait
how did you go from a + b - 1 = 0 to a+a = 1
did you do the left first?
yep
sorry should have said sub it in or smth
it feels weird to just say u(…)= 0 and v(…) = 0
you should remember that you can only say ku + lv = 0 => k = 0 & l = 0 if u isn't a multiple of v
cause theyre not unit vectors or perpendicular
yea
it is not illegal
it is a property of linearly independent vectors
actually a defining property
i learnt a good chunk of vectors by myself cause i missed my lessons sprry
how can we tell if a vector is linearly independent
a set of vectors $\left{ v_1, ... , v_r \right}$ is linearly independent if and only if the equation $a_1 v_1 + ... + a_r v_r = 0$ has only the solution $a_1 = 0, ... , a_r = 0$
Katharine
a vector itself doesn't have the property of linear dependence or independence
a set of 2 or more do
in this case u and v
are a set of 2 vectors
and since there is no other solution to
$k v + l u = 0$
Katharine
Katharine
ok
i have some other vector q’s
could i get confirmation on this one
ill send a pic
i think it works
also
guessing that you've defined the length squared of a vector as the dot product
between itself
right
yes
|a + b|^2 = (a + b) . (a + b)
i know the dot product is commutative
but if you're explicitly writing both terms
try to remember that the second one is b.a
ic
in this case it doesn't matter
for 2 reasons
but in other things it mighjt
anyway
is there a case that you can show where it might matter?
matrices
(A + B)(A+B) = AA + AB + BA + BB
and in matrix multiplication
it isn't always commutative
meaning AB is not always BA
ic
also uhhh im really sorry to be bothering you with the same type of question but theres another one
this is a matrix
PH THIS THISNG
PH?
oh
ah
multiplying two of these
two sums of these
as in (A+B)(A+B)
gives AA + AB + BA + BB and AB is not BA
sometimes it might be
but generally no
anyway
did you try drawing this?
from here
i forget how to relate b back
alsp
i wrote this wrong
there
man
i wrote this
really wromg
@vague seal is this one alright?
that seems good
alr
one more q to go
is a because
i find AP
and AC will be a constant*AP
its smaller than AP so its between 0 and 1
for b tho, how would i prove concurrent
mmmmmm
find OR first?
you show that the intersections of AP and BQ and AP and OR have the same point
that would show the lines are concurrent
you get BQ and OR for free
so don't try to prove all three combinations
?
If you prove that the intersections of AP and BQ as well as AP and OR are the same point
then you don't have to prove that the intersection of BQ and OR also is the same point
and vice verse
oh iv
proving BQ-OR and AP-BQ have the same point means you don't have to prove that AP-OR also has the same point
Can't he use the proposition that the segments that go from one vertice of a parallelogram to the opposite one intersect in the middle point as a lemma?
I mean, that should save him quite a bit of work, and it's a pretty well known property of parallelograms
Oh, nvm then, for some reason thought it was a parallelogram
My bad, haha
Same thing still works for the orthocenter in a triangle though, if I'm not mistaken
ok
so this
yea but they want a vector method
im stuck on showing the intersections have the same point
i can find the ratio
i think-
i hope this is the right way
@vague seal this is what i have, but it doesnt feel correct enough
what am i missing?
it doesn't
it proves that the ratio of OR to OC and AP to AC is the same
In order to prove concurrence
you need to show that OR-AP intersect at C
and also
OR-BQ intersect at C
lets call the intersection of OR and AP C
that's a 'given'
yep
then you need to prove concurrence by showing that the intersection of OR and BQ is also at C
that would show that three lines are intersecting at 1 point
which is concurrence
since the q gave that BQ and AP intersect at C, are we allowed to do this?
use that one
the intersection of BQ and AP is C
then prove that the intersection of OR and AP is also C
ignore what i said about C before
The goal is to prove that the equation you used in you ratio thing is valid
that you can in fact say AC = AO + OC vector wise
that OC is a thing
Lets call that equation OD
to not confuse ourselves by using something that implies we know for a fact it's concurrent
ook
so if you can show that OD + AO = AC then you have proven concurrence
as then you have proven that D and C are the same point
vector addition
btw
for OD + AO = AC
yes
ahhh i got it now
D is the intersection between AP and OR
and that happens at some lambda_3 multiple of OR
i was playing a game too :D
Closed by @drifting root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lets take a topological space X. Is it possible for $A , B \subseteq X $ , $G_\delta$ sets to have that $ A \cap B = \emptyset$ but $\overline{A} \cap \overline{B} \neq \emptyset$ ?
whitefang
Closed by @fallen heath
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lets say we have an infinity topological space X and an equivalence relation on X with [x] being an equivalnt class for $x \in X$. what requirements we need for the equivalence relation (or the space X) so that this implication would be always true for $ x,y \in X$ if $\overline{[x]} = \overline{[y]}$ then $[x]=[y] $
whitefang
By $\overline{[x]}$ you mean the closure of $[x]$?
Bequi
@fallen heath
@fallen heath Has your question been resolved?
Yeah the closure
If we have that there is a equivalent class which is dense on X then it fails
But no dense equivalent classes is enough to ensure it?
Not necessarily. Consider if you had the equivalence classes {0} and R\{0} in R. One of them is dense but your condition still holds here
And no dense equivalent classes also won't be enough
Oh actually yeah you are right
You could have an equivalence relation containing the classes (0,1) \cap Q and (0,1) \cap Q^c in R
Neither of those are dense in R
but their closures are still equal
This is kinda tautological but what you need is that for every closed set X there is at most 1 equivalence class which has X as closure
Sorry right now I am not in a position to check if I understand it but I will check it later
Thank you

@fallen heath Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Consider the metric $d(x,y)=\max{d_1(x_1,y_1),\ldots,d_n(x_n,y_n)}$. Obviously, $d_k(x_k,y_k)\leq d(x,y)$ for all $k$, hence convergence in the product space implies convergence in the component space. But how can I show convergence in the component space implies the convergence in the product space? I know how to do this for the Euclidean metric, but here I am stuck. I feel like I need some upper bound to $d(x,y)$.
psie
you need the following basic observation:
d(x,y) < epsilon if and only if d_k(x,y) < epsilon for all k
ok, that was helpful, thanks 👍
.close
Closed by @inland patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why?>??
i understand everything before it
why is current through A and B 0.10 A and curernt through C 0.20 A????
The current is split so that voltage is equal on either side
I don't get it
the equivalent resistance of the top line is 120 ohm
by using V=IR, we know that the top line has twice the resistance and therefore must have half the current
oh okay that makes sense
but why is D = 0.3?
is there a way to show it mathematically
or like through an equation
do you mean I?
and wont C = A and B?
I?
oh D
current across like indivisual lod or whatever it is
are you familiar with kirchhoffs laws?
umm no
eh thats fine
like i thought, at D there was 60 resistance right? so
60/100 * 0.3
Me when garlic garlicks
bruh
that doesnt make sense
IM SO CONFUSED
like how did they get their values
0.1, 0.2, 0.3, for the indivisual lamps
mathematically, is there some sort of process or steps i can follow?
the current flowing through a circuit must stay constant unless it splits at a junction
right
or if two currents converge at a junction
you can imagine the first three lightbulbs as a single resistor with 40 ohm resistance
which makes this easier to think about
because then you have one loop with no junctions so the current must be constant throughout
right, makes sense
electricity problems is a lot of fiddling around with things until they make sense to you
ive got an exam on all of circuits tomorrow
20 more pages in textbook
and i cant understand the part which was supposed to be a given
🦾 🦾 🦾 🦾
keep practicing and youll get the hang of it
ITS 3 AM 😩 😩 😩
Closed by @thorny oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm not sure exactly why i'm getting this wrong
is this SAT stuff?
Can you go through how you did this
Nice
ok for the first answer i just multiple the mean by day by the # of days
so
247 * 10
ugh hold on
okay yeah
go on
Is it refering to total distribution or distriution of food and lodging
Daily standard deviation: $60 ----> Number of days: 10
multiplying the daily standard deviation thing by the square root of the number of days the standard deviation of the overall cost over a period of days.
that's what i'm trying to figure out 😭
this is above my math level sorry 😭
i swear the answer should just be ^2 b (which should be 360k)
no worries i might just drop this question bc this is so aids 😭
never taking stat
@cunning loom Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cunning loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone
@naive sleet Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
wsp
multiplying f(x) by a constant only scales the output of the function, not the input
since the output is y, it only scales the function in the y-direction
which is the same direction as the y-axis and hence parallel
can you
make me understand
my showing me this
by drawing a grap
thing is
i understand it
but i cant visualize it
,w graph sin(x)
,w graph 10sin(x)
,w graph sin(x) and 10sin(x)
but why is it "parallel"
cause its getting stretch only vertically
so its getting stretched "relatively" from the x-axis but parallely from the y-axis
THIS IS MY ISSUE I CAN VISUALIZE IT BEING STRETCHED RELATIVE TO X-AXIS
BUT THE PARALLEL STATEMENT DOESNT MAKE SENSE TO ME
yea im trying to also figure out how to explain the parallel part
thank you <3
yes
yes
now lets stretch sin(x) by a factor of 10
okie
notice how the line parallel to the x axis stays the same lenght
but the line parallel to the y axis get stretched
thats what it means by being "stretched parallel to the y axis"
is it clear or do you need me to explain further?
yea
ahahaha thanks
Closed by @naive sleet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
my fav is obviously chocolate chip (maybe with some vanilla)
send aaaadddddddddddreeeeeeeeees
xd
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does basic nbhd means nbhd basis ?
@fallen heath Has your question been resolved?
Hello everyone, this is video i made about why does the area under the curve of 1/1 + x**2 equals PI, the proof is visual and uses concepts like probability and geometry to respond the question https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2gv-BP9SpU
The video intuitively explains why PI is under the curve "1 / (1 + x**2)" by slicing the unit circle into segments and mapping their areas to bars under the curve. Summing these areas visually reveals PI. Additional insights are provided on the derivative of the tangent and the Cauchy distribution, connecting geometry, calculus, and probability....
sorry probably you posted it in wrong channel
@fallen heath Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Express the function $\frac{1}{\sqrt{x+\sqrt{x}}}$ As the composition of 3 functions
f(why am i here )= I don't know
I was thinking $f(g(h)))= \frac{1}{\sqrt{x+\sqrt{x}}}$
f(why am i here )= I don't know
ye
f(x) =1/x
i was about to say 1/2sqrt(x) lmao
$g(x)= \sqrt{x+\sqrt{x}}$