#help-49
1 messages · Page 76 of 1
@spice scroll that questoin is too far ahead
also, thats wrong
stick with me because this gets convoluted
im struggling to follow
can we go over the goal of this function?
ok?
okay
can we start over?
we already have
i think i lost you
alright
this is the starting over
since we already started over, you now know what solving an equation by y'' + 3y' + 5y = 0 means
can you say it?
as in, literally the meaning
.
yes
the method to solve equations of the form y'' + (number) y' + (number) y = 0 starts with an educated guess
never true
we go with a different y than just y = e^x
you know we couldve also tried e^(2x), e^(-0.5x), etc.
so youve discounted y = e^x so far and we know that wont work
among the general "e^(rx)", lets see what happens when we plug that in
so we are looking for a form of "e^rx" for this equation, alright
to make this equality to 0 hold true
not that form necessarily, but thats pretty much it
or trying to use them specifically due to e^rx 's nature
as a deriviative
i think i understand
thats more like it, e^(rx) has conveniences attached to it that lets it be the only kind of "shape" involved here
yes
now as before, you can plug in y = e^(rx) into the equation, and see if you can solve for r
r^2 * e^rx + 3r * e^rx + 5 * e^rx = 0
brb
we can let T = e^rx
and then we have a polynomial fucntion of the form 2T^2 + 3T + 5 = 0
which is 2 complex numbers
but then T=complex number doesnt make sense, since e^rx is over the real numbers i think in our case usually
@spice scroll back
ysz
you likely dont expect that $\sin(x)=\frac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}$ and $\cos(x)=\frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}2$
mtt
not at all
but the fact that theyre true means we cant discount complex roots, because those roots can be used to combine otherwise complex solutions into sines and cosines
we'll get to that in a bit
you dont exactly have this be the polynomial
i understand
instead the polynomial is r^2 + 3r + 5 = 0
you can think of it as us dividing by e^(rx)
yes i understand
now lets say you solve r^2 + 3r + 5 = 0
so we will just solve for r
yea
yea theyre not, I didnt have the foresight to choose better numbers
try r^2 + r - 12 = 0 instead
(this would from trying y = e^(rx) on y'' + y' - 12y = 0)
now with r = 3 and r = -4 being plausible, that means what two functions can fit y'' + y' - 12y = 0?
are y=e^3x and y=e^-4x
yep those work
however those arent the only ones that can fit
if you look closer, 2e^(3x) and e^(3x) - e^(-4x) also work
in general, you can multiply a solution by a constant and also add/subtract two solutions together to still have solutions
this allows for any function of the form y = Ae^(3x) + Be^(-4x) to be a valid solution
y = Ae^(3x) + Be^(-4x) is "the" solution to y'' + y' - 12y = 0
@spice scroll stuck on anything so far
nope
i just had to go for a while sorry
yea np
since youre back, we can move on to the next point which connects us to solving this
great
so far we've gone over the solutions to y'' + ay' + by = 0
(if you get two real roots as a solution)
(one real root / two complex roots will result in these other cases)
this can be generalized as a linear equation of the row matirx (1 a b )x = 0 right?
not necessarily
we're going to use a different idea to solving u(n+2) = a u(n+1) + b u(n) instead
how can we solve for something of increasing indexes? i mean we can use recursion for decreasing indexes like G_n = 2G_(n-1), but i dont understand for increasing ones
increasing indexes just means you can replace n with n+1 or with n+2, then rearrange the equation to be decreasing instead
G(n+1) = 2G(n) is the same as G(n) = 2G(n-1)
What’s up
oh i see
yea
small world
Uhh are you guys doing like complex analysis or something?
I don’t understand what you guys are talking about
he found out a method he hasnt heard before to solve equations of the form un = a u(n-1) + b u(n-2)
we've gone through solving a very similar y'' + ay' + by = 0 so far
yes
nw
youre solving the equation for a possible function y where adding y'', ay', and by add up to 0
its a bit different than solving for values
I’m only calc bc rn 
yes but then in our case it isnt 0 but H_n right?
me too
Whaaa
not really
this is differential equation
because i dont either
so how the relation be created?
It’s fun though (but I haven’t learned any of it)
as in, we want to connect
y''+ay`+by=0
to
H_n = lambda^n
you can get from solve y'' = a y' + by to solve H(n+2) = a H(n+1) + Hn with a trick involving an infinite series
@spice scroll avoid looking at that lambda^n for now
now do you know about taylor series
alright
ive seen some equation regarding it but i havent learned it yet
we did do some series stuff although
whats important is that some functions can be written as a "power series"
so $f(x)$ can be a $\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^n$
mtt
i dont think i follow
i do understand this can be a function of course
yea thats all
now lets pretend that $h(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{H_n}{n!}x^n$
mtt
also here, can H_n+2 and H_n be swapped maybe?
not like that, we'll get to that
alright
now if you simplify h'(x)
same thing but without the sum symbol?
dont know what you mean but try it
now lets pretend that $h(x)=n=\frac{H_n}{n!}x^n$
you dont just erase the sum symbol
Ayanokoji (ALWAYS PING ME)
no not like that either
then i dont know how to integrate it
Im asking to differentiate it
i mean derivitate
what you hopefully meant is to do:
,,\dv{}{x}h(x)=\dv{}{x}\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{H_n}{n!}x^n=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\dv{}{x}\frac{H_n}{n!}x^n
mtt
i dont understand this
i mean you want to integrate it that way?
differentiate it that wya
d/dx is usually for that reason there
ik but why the notation
so that you know which part Im differentiating
,,\dv{}{x}\qty(h(x))=\dv{}{x}\qty(\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{H_n}{n!}x^n)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\dv{}{x}\qty(\frac{H_n}{n!}x^n)
mtt
oh wow
well usually in high school we just did (y)'=y'=...
yea seeing the ' in the corner I figured wouldnt be clear but I thought wrong
,,h'(x)=\qty(\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{H_n}{n!}x^n)'=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\qty(\frac{H_n}{n!}x^n)'
mtt
yes alright
so we deriviate for x
but i honestly dont know if i can keep up with this
yea you dont have to
alright
I can just continue from here, and youll eventually see how it all fits together
alright
the derivative of x^n is usually nx^(n-1)
i dont know how to do the differentiation, you probably know
that works for n=0, n=1, n=2, etc.
true
so (x^n)' should just be nx^(n-1)
yes
now Hn and n! are both constants
oh i get it
yep
so since its just a poly sum we can just change that
,,h'(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{nH_n}{n!}x^{n-1}
mtt
true
,,h'(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{H_n}{(n-1)!}x^{n-1}
mtt
now keep in mind that when n = 0, this is just 1
d/dx of that is just 0
,,h'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{H_n}{(n-1)!}x^{n-1}
mtt
yes
i dont see how this function leads anywhere yet but i get this part
mtt
you mean if we defrenciate again h''(x)=0?
why did you assume H_n+1 =n*H
_n
,,h(x)=H_0+H_1x+H_2\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_3\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_4\frac{x^4}{4!}+\cdots
\h'(x)=H_1+H_2x+H_3\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_4\frac{x^3}{3!}+\cdots
mtt
so I think this should be clearer
you d/dx each term and you end up with that for h'(x)
i think i see it
but then again this is an infinite series...
,,h(x)=H_0+H_1x+H_2\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_3\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_4\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_5\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\h'(x)=H_1+H_2x+H_3\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_4\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_5\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_6\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\h''(x)=H_2+H_3x+H_4\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_5\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_6\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_7\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
mtt
well i see what youre doing, and it is true
lets continue
yes
now consider h'', h', and h here
term by term, you know that H2 = H1 - 6 H0
then H3 = H2 - 6 H1
(so H3 x = H2 x - 6 H1 x)
but can we rally take n=0 to defined?
oh I forgot completely about that
the sequence begins at 1 instead of 0
alr thats a minor change
,,h(x)=H_1x+H_2\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_3\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_4\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_5\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\h'(x)=H_2x+H_3\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_4\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_5\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_6\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\h''(x)=H_3x+H_4\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_5\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_6\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_7\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
mtt
yes
there we go
so h''(x) = h'(x) - 6 h(x) and without an H0 anywhere
does that make sense
alright awesome
i dont really understand how we can say that
use Hn = H(n-1) - 6H(n-2)
im trying, but taking H_n or H_n-1 or H_n-2 into one side is kind of hard to try and make this equality with all sides
no i just dont see it
,,h''(x)=H_3x+H_4\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_5\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_6\frac{x^4}{4!}+\cdots
\=(H_2-6H_1)x+(H_3-6H_2)\frac{x^2}{2!}+(H_4-6H_3)\frac{x^3}{3!}+(H_5-6H_4)\frac{x^4}{4!}+\cdots
mtt
now you factor this a different way:
this i agree on
,,h''(x)=H_3x+H_4\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_5\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_6\frac{x^4}{4!}+\cdots
\=(H_2-6H_1)x+(H_3-6H_2)\frac{x^2}{2!}+(H_4-6H_3)\frac{x^3}{3!}+(H_5-6H_4)\frac{x^4}{4!}+\cdots
\=H_2x+H_3\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_4\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_5\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_6\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\-6H_1x-6H_2\frac{x^2}{2!}-6H_3\frac{x^3}{3!}-6H_4\frac{x^4}{4!}-6H_5\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
mtt
i dont understand the bottom line
I expanded it
when you say "expand" do you mean open parenthases?
yep, in english that is what it means
oh i understand now
yea
i was confused because i wouldve expected these to be side by side
as in i thought this was another "equals to" step with "=" omitted
i get it
isnt this what taylor expansion is?
no this is a power series
i think i once saw a video about something similiar
it resembles a taylor series and we'll treat it like that, but for now its just a power series
alright great
,,h''(x)=H_3x+H_4\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_5\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_6\frac{x^4}{4!}+\cdots
\=(H_2-6H_1)x+(H_3-6H_2)\frac{x^2}{2!}+(H_4-6H_3)\frac{x^3}{3!}+(H_5-6H_4)\frac{x^4}{4!}+\cdots
\=H_2x+H_3\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_4\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_5\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_6\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\-6H_1x-6H_2\frac{x^2}{2!}-6H_3\frac{x^3}{3!}-6H_4\frac{x^4}{4!}-6H_5\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\=H_2x+H_3\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_4\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_5\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_6\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\-6(H_1x+H_2\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_3\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_4\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_5\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots)
mtt
the next line is to "factor" the -6 "out of" the second row
i understand
then, finally:
,,h''(x)=H_3x+H_4\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_5\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_6\frac{x^4}{4!}+\cdots
\=(H_2-6H_1)x+(H_3-6H_2)\frac{x^2}{2!}+(H_4-6H_3)\frac{x^3}{3!}+(H_5-6H_4)\frac{x^4}{4!}+\cdots
\=H_2x+H_3\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_4\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_5\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_6\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\-6H_1x-6H_2\frac{x^2}{2!}-6H_3\frac{x^3}{3!}-6H_4\frac{x^4}{4!}-6H_5\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\=H_2x+H_3\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_4\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_5\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_6\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots
\-6(H_1x+H_2\frac{x^2}{2!}+H_3\frac{x^3}{3!}+H_4\frac{x^4}{4!}+H_5\frac{x^5}{5!}+\cdots)
\=h'(x)-6h(x)
mtt
i agree
nice
so we get
h''(x)=h'(x)-6*h(x)
yep
lets continue
so then h''(x) - h'(x) + 6 h(x) = 0
yes
now we know how to solve stuff like this
we assume h(x) = e^(rx)
to essentially get r^2 - r + 6 = 0
then we solve for r
but can we really? we saw it isnt neccsarily like that
or do i not understand e^x properly?
remember from earlier we made an "educated guess"
this is that educated guess
it is not the final h(x)
it is a guess
alright
you can also think of it as
yes
we assume rather? or check?
we check
in this case, not really
alright
in the most general case, we can have:
so it might not be equal to what we are subsitituing as?
yes
lets continue
,,y''-y'-12y=0\implies y=Ae^{4x}+Be^{-3x}
mtt
i dont know how to do this in between step
no Im just showing the final solution
alright
so ill not worry about the algebra of those mid steps? i think i could make do it with more time
but it could be hard
mtt
you plug in $e^{rx}$ to check when it can work
mtt
this results in $r^2+ar+b=0$
mtt
assume that you can get two different values for $r$: $m$ and $n$
mtt
so we now know $e^{mx}$ and $e^{nx}$ work
mtt
are you with me so far
now $Ae^{mx}+Be^{nx}$ also works
mtt
as in, equal to y?
yea
i mean i dont think thats the case neccsarily
it's like saying if both x=2 and x=3 are a solution for something like:
x^2-3x+6=0
then
2^2-3*3+6=0
youre not thinking about what kind of problem we're doing here
we know that $(e^{mx})''+a(e^{mx})'+b(e^{mx})=0$
mtt
also that $(e^{nx})''+a(e^{nx})'+b(e^{nx})=0$
mtt
now if you multiply one of the solutions by a constant, you can factor that constant out and still get 0
yes true
true
,,(Ae^{mx})''+a(Ae^{mx})'+b(Ae^{mx})=0
\A(e^{mx})''+Aa(e^{mx})'+Ab(e^{mx})=0
\A((e^{mx})''+a(e^{mx})'+b(e^{mx}))=0
mtt
yes
lets continue
this also works for Ae^(mx) + Be^(nx) as follows
yes true
,,(Ae^{mx}+Be^{nx})''+a(Ae^{mx}+Be^{nx})'+b(Ae^{mx}+Be^{nx})=0
\\text{expand}
\(Ae^{mx})''+(Be^{nx})''+a(Ae^{mx})'+a(Be^{nx})'+b(Ae^{mx})+b(Be^{nx})=0
\\text{rearrange}
\(Ae^{mx})''+a(Ae^{mx})'+b(Ae^{mx}))+(Be^{nx})''+a(Be^{nx})'+b(Be^{nx})=0
\\text{factor}
\A((e^{mx})''+a(e^{mx})'+b(e^{mx}))+B((e^{nx})''+a(e^{nx})'+b(e^{nx}))=0
mtt
i understand
nice
so you can see Ae^(mx) + Be^(nx) works since e^(mx) and e^(nx) do
in general, A f(x) + B g(x) would work if f(x) and g(x) do
you see how that works, right?
yes
yes
this property of the differential equation is called "linear"
this is a "linear differential equation"
like in linear algebra right?
great
very good
this also means e^(mx) and e^(nx) are your "basis vectors" for the solutions
we just started vector spaces so i dont really know "basis bectors" as a term
i mean i do know stuff like 2 reals
(1
1)
can represent a 2 dimensional space if i remeber correct, like y=x
its a similar idea to "any of A (1, 0) + B (0, 1) is within the 2D space R^2"
this i think i get
lets cotntinue
alr
didnt know thats what you meant by continuing
using what we learned, we know that the solution $Ae^{mx}+Be^{nx}$ works
yes true
well $H_n=7H_{n-1}-6H_{n-2}$ will mean that $h''(x)=7h'(x)-6h(x)$
mtt
yes
therefore
$h''(x)-7h'(x)+
6h(x)=0$
Ayanokoji (ALWAYS PING ME)
and we can do the same thing we did earlier
oh i need to find the values of r for this case too right?
yea
r= 7+-sqrt(43)
try doing that again
i dont see how it's wrong it's
r^2 -7 * 2r + 6 = 0
2r?
oh right
r= 6,1
yep
oh thats also the result they had
yea $h(x)=Ae^{1x}+Be^{6x}$
mtt
we're not done yet though
oh they did a similiar polynomial of power 2 with lambda instead of r
yes
now A and B need to be found
and A and B are actually these constants
but question would be how to get h(x)=H_n
how do we do it?
you just follow along what they did
for A and B they just took the base cases H_1 and H_2
yea its essentially a different method
but we dont know why h(x)=H_n
thats not true
thats not true at all
you are mistaking their method with mine
what we're going through is a justification that will eventually lead to their shortcuts
alright
lets continue
H_1 = 7, H_2 = 43
wait somethings off here
@twilit jetty im feeling pretty dizzy, i think i need to get some sleep
alr you can go for that
im very sorry for wasting your time
Ill try to figure out how the rest of this plays out, I forgot the necessary steps
you cant really agree on their method
you cant trust half of the stuff its written down, you have to think of it as scratch work
you can think of it as "we know how the solutions usually look, so we only write down the bare minimum to remember what we're doing"
as in this is just a a pattern people use for this problems?
yea
seems kind of weird to use a pattern we never understand
it is
especially in a class for mathemticians
well i dont know what to think
but i understand part of something
again, thank you very much for your help mate!
np
goodnight
cya
.close
Closed by @spice scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct?
i dont think so
du is incorrect, since your sin and cosine have different inputs
Closed by @tough jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help for this
Apparently it's not B
$\lim_{x \to 1000^{-}}$ refers to the limit from the left only
Civil Service Pigeon
you're right that $\lim_{x \to 1000} D(x)$ doesn't exist, but that's not what's being asked
Civil Service Pigeon
what's being asked?
) Use one-sided limits to determine the limit of D(x) as x approaches $1,000 and as x approaches $3,000. First, find the one-sided limits and the limit as x approaches $1,000.
Select the correct choice below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box to complete your choice.
thanks
i see
i thought the limit from the left didn't exist because it could be either x or 0.97x depending on where you are, right?
????
1000 is neither an endpoint nor included in the domain of the x part
I'm so lost
i might be reading this wrong, but, if we're coming from the left side of 1000, wouldn't either of the first two solutions apply?
ok
we're taking the one-sided limit from the left
meaning we're going from this direction
ok
now which part of the function does this correspond to?
"this" being the left hand limit
see picture above
isn't this also coming from the left?
I'm a bit lost ngl

Bro
because i was STRUGGLINGGGG
Pleaseeeee explain
Well what part of the function are we going along to approach x=1000 from the left
0.97 right?
ok
so that's the part of the function we take the limit of
$\lim_{x \to 1000^{-}} D(x)=\lim_{x \to 1000^{-}} (0.97x)$
Civil Service Pigeon
i think i was thinking about the limit going up as x goes up
k you guys lmk if you need me
damn
david is that the last problem?
this is the next one
Select the correct choice below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box to complete your choice.
A.
ModifyingBelow lim With x right arrow 1000 Superscript plus Upper D left parenthesis x right parenthesisequals
enter your response here (Simplify your answer.)
B.
The limit does not exist.
can you send a picture
it's easier to read that way'
never mind i see what it's saying
alright
so 910?
@small jasper would it be 950 or 910?
take this as you will
okay
try 950
That's not it
.
@small jasper We need your help bro
one sec
lol
im confused
yes
and i tried to follow the rules from last time
but it didn't work
unless i did something wrong
FRICK
I KNOW
IT'S SUPPOSED TO ME 0.95(3000)
NOT 0.95(1000)
TRY 2850
😭 😭 😭 😭 😭
okay
dne
i think
it's the same as last time
NO
NONOONONON
i misread it
type in 2730
nice job bro :O
thanks
this reg 3000
now
does not exist
np
If you want to stick around I am going back to understand what I got wrong on my other submissions
alright
nice I'm up to a 90% now
awesome!
thx btw
np
great!
i was kinda curious, whats the difference again between a shaded circle and an unshaded one in the graph?
the reason why i said it was graph c is because we know f(0) is -1
so the circle is shaded anyway
ohh yeaaa cos if it is graph a, -1 is not shaded, alr tyy
but since the limit at 0- is unshaded, it remains unshaded
because that's the actual value at f(0)
yupp, got itt
y = 1?
and it didn't work?
...
isn't y=1 the only horizontal line that passes through (0,1)
oh
type y=1
wait
yes
y=1
@golden mortar Has your question been resolved?
-3
y=1
C
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
we can't see the graph
what's your issue here?
do you know which part of the graph you should be looking at?
Idk what to look for no
do you understand the limit notation
it looks like you did a few similar questions earlier
I'm trying to understand but losing the main idea
the - or + when present in superscript
indicates the left or right side limit respectively
so here since there's a + in superscript ,
follow the curve towards x=-2 from the right side
I'm losing this
which part
the notation is the same as what you applied here
#help-49 message
English pls, also
This help channel is occupied, please don't talk in here unless you're helping Davisdavid
Idk bro this is my first time looking at this. I got online class
@golden mortar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
u js substitute it right?
@golden mortar Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @golden mortar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any hints?
write the general term as (-1)^n(n+1)^2 / 5^n
Yeah it’ll be an alternating geometric series
maybe you can find a taylor series or manipulate into a geometric series or something
They haven't taught us Taylor series yet
there isn't a fixed common ratio
There is
Should be n+1/5
Nvm I’m dumb
Forgot common ratio has to be just a number
Closed by @wide ore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a question regarding orienation in vector spaces
What does "arbitrary choice" of bases being positively or negatively oriented?
Our formal definition in our course in analytical geometry states
say e and b are two bases of some vector space V
e is positively oriented with b if det(A)>0 where A is the transition matrix from base e to b
does that mean that I just choose if det(A) is >0 or <0 ?
@strong pebble Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@stiff heart
@strong pebble Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
"Arbitrary choice" means you can decide how you define "positive". In your screenshot, it said that right-hand bases are typically assigned positive. However, you don't need to follow that standard. You can use the definition in your class to decide what is considered 'positively' oriented.
instead of the usual determinant, you could define a new function which you could call for example dit such that dit(A)=-det(A). then dit satisfies all the usual properties of the determinant. and then you could say stuff is positive if dit(A)>0.
like, for example, -det(A) is positively oriented?
see this
in other words: yes. Positively orientated doesn't need to equate to positive determinent. Just as in the screeen shot, orientation is just a cycle/direction it's turning.
@strong pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @strong pebble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i started off with p E 4k, 4k+1, 4k+2, 4k+3
and with some manual labour, it seems 4k+3 seems to satisfy the asked condition
the issue is with the options
according to my solution, B and C are correct
can anyone help (please ping while replying)
@last slateit all sounds wrong
i see
what's 4k+3
can you please explain
like why do you think 4k+3 is special
because it seems to satisfy the condition
yeah..
nevermind no idea
if it works for 3 it works for 4k+3 numbers
😭
thanks, i would appreciate some help
the options are very tricky
well the problem is 4k+3 is not (C)
huh?
C means 4k+3 always works, and 4k+1 always works and 4k+2 always works
B also doesn;t work
yeah i got it
i can;t do it in my head i just use calculator
its a specific case in those 3
question has beauty i must say
thanks for your help frog
.close
Closed by @ember sand
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you;re ignoring "sufficient"
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the system of equations has exactly one solution, not the quadratic
you're assuming that there is 1 root (x-int), whereas a system of equations is an intersection between multiple equations
ohhh so i only use the quadratic if its like intersect or something?
then what should i dooo
try to do some rearranging and see if you can solve a simultaneous equation
hint: substitution
that's exactly what i said... but he gave it away
so basically plug it in first before doing method
:(
thanks tho
also matching pfp kind of
@vast bone Has your question been resolved?
the graph needs to be continous, consider the functions when a is less than or equal to 50 and when a is greater than 50
function in option C does not cover all the possible number of points earned by students
when a is less than or equal to 50, what is the function?
uhh then thats 5a ?
? wait wdym
y = 5a, from 0 to 50 inclusive
i still dont get why its not C tho since we dont know how many students but you alr know the first 50 got 5 points each so the rest is just 50*5 + 3a
but when a is greater than 50, its y = 3a + c
mhm
the graph needs to be continuous or it would mean that the total points drop or increase after a is 50
ill show you;
okay
at a = 50, the total points drop which does not make sense in this context
well, you know that the first graph is y = 5a
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Here's a simple explanation for option c not being the correct option:-
According to the data for 50 assignments a student should earn 250 points,
now if you analyse g(50) for option C will definitely not going to give you 250
The only two options that give 250 for g(50) are B and D
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ohh
For an additional assignment a student earns 253 points, as given in question
so the required function will be that which have g(51)=253
got it?
yeah
@vast bone Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please help me
I have no clue how to find the equation of the ellipse
<@&286206848099549185>
please
i really
need help
asap
im not trying to be rude or anything
but im actually gonna be in a lot of trouble if i don't get help
please
😭
@whole wasp Has your question been resolved?
@robust cloak
PLEASE HELPERS
<@&286206848099549185>
PLEASEEE
PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEE
of the lines yes
but with the ellipse
idk how to
nope
I didn' t get the foci
L2 and L3= (17,-14)
no
L1 and L3= (1,2)
L1 and L2 are parallel
whats delta
the area of the triangle?
i mean how would the circumcircle help tho we need to find the ellipse don't we
right right
oh shiiit
i read it wrong
my bad my bad
would you be down
to help me
in other questions
they're all related to ellipses
its alright
thanks
oh wait no
i still need to know
the focus right
of the ellipse
which I do not know
we need to find the circumcentre of rqs
we dk rs
s is the focus
yes but we need to know the location of the focus don't we
to use the distance formula
alright
take your time
yes
yep
c=ae
right
but here
the ellipse
is oblique
there'll be an xy term in it's equation
so it won't fit the general form
how old are you if i may ask
its alright
are you in high school or college?
you seem to be pretty smart
thanks for
trying to help
@whole wasp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
<@&286206848099549185>
@whole wasp Has your question been resolved?
no
@whole wasp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
. The sum of the digits of the positive integer n is 123. The sum of the digits of 2n is 66. The
digits of n include two 3s, six 7s, p 5s, q 6s and no other digits. What is p^2 + q^2?
(A) 106 (B) 160 (C) 72
Bro I swear this was in help 3
yeah
honestly your best bet might be to just find integer solutions for p and q
based on the answer choices
maybe
yea that works
each answer choice only has one square, so its pretty straightforward
i dont get the "The sum of the digits of 2n is 66" part
ngl you don't need that
you can just cheese it with the answer choices
what is this for? competition or school hw
The digit x 2 then add all the numbers in the new digit obtained from multiplication by 2
k
random summer class thing
i still have no idea how u do it D:
r they
can you have a decimal number of digits?
its a very cheeky solution, and wouldnt work if there were multiple choices
theres prolly a legit way to solve it but they're all much harder
Closed by @steady rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
?
5p+6q=75, so the only possibilities are (p,q)=(15,0), (9,5), and (3,12)
It’s decently trivial to finish from here given the digit sum of 2n
Anyway I gtg 👋
Closed by @steady rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yea just same diophantine method with less cheese ig
also easier lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me get started here? Idk what the first step is :(
We are learning about area rn
Do I use area of triangle here?
But for which triangle
I think he's supposed to use triangle similarity
Try giving the vertices names (A, B, C, ...)
And finding two triangles which are similar
Then, use that to build an equation and solve for x.
@livid crystal Has your question been resolved?
is it marked as right angle by the teacher? if so you can find x with a^2+b^2=c^2
Yes
once you find x, take the area of a rectangle (base*height, not using the longest side) and divide by 2
What method are they using here? 🥲
the same one but for both triangles at the same time!
here they are treating the long side of the combined shape as the base and using x as the height
Ohhh
it looks like they solved for x algebraically by using the given measurements of the big triangle (3 and 4)
I see
@livid crystal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @livid crystal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can somebody fact check this
that would be my guess

