#help-49
1 messages · Page 61 of 1
which matrix
1 min
i will send the question again
$A^, = A^-1$
This is how i did it
Assuming $B^-1AB = X$
And applying DET on both sides
I would be left with $"IAI=IXI"$
Cnidarian
so
skew symmetric means A' = -A not A^-1
Yes but my question is about inverse
oh right sorry youre saying A' means the inverse of A?
Can we can A is skew symmetric if X is skew symmetric
ok
$\mathrm{det}\left(B^{-1}AB\right) = \mathrm{det}\left(B^{-1}\right) \cdot \mathrm{det}\left(A\right) \cdot \mathrm{det}\left(B\right) = \mathrm{det}\left(B\right)^{-1} \cdot \mathrm{det}\left(A\right) \cdot \mathrm{det}\left(B\right) = \mathrm{det}\left(A\right)$
is true
Acman
but i dont see how that helps with skew symmetry
for a skew symmetric matrix DET A is 0
why
are you saying, ignoring the question and just you want to think about if any of these statements are true if its B^-1 A B instead ?
yes
right ok ok
we can say that B' A B is skew symmetric iff A is skew symmetric
but we cannot say for sure anything about the symmetry of A or B' A B
what you have written there is not totally correct
oh do you mean for IAI to be |A|
right yes ok
it is always true that det X = det A
this is all you can say
actually sorry no thats not right
1s
you can say that if X is skew symmetric A has determinant 0
and conversely if A is skew symmetric then X has determinant 0
For a matrix having Det 0 doesn't mean its skew symmetric ?
not necessarily
oh
$\begin{vmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 \end{vmatrix} = 0$
Acman
Determinants of every skew symmetric matrix is zero
Okay,that clears it up
But other way round is false
Closed by @gleaming geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is one of the final parts of the problem, i need to find k for which modulus will be the lowest, what does that mean?
In theory lowest modulus is 0 right
why cant i just say k = 0
i got the answer, k = 3/5 but im not sure why
@steep quest Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
why not just convert it to cartesian right away
Bob l'éponge
so $r^2 = x^2 + y^2$
Bob l'éponge
you need to get rid of r and theta entirely
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yep
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so I was thinking of starting with $z= e^{i \theta}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
so I have $e^{-i\theta}-e^{2i \theta}= i(z^{-i\theta}+e^{2i\theta})$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
now I know that multiplying by $i$ rotates the number by pi/2
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
so I have
$e^{-i \theta}-2e^{i \theta} = e^{\pi/2 - i \theta)}+ e^{\pi/2 -2i \theta}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
let $e^{i\theta}=u
so I have to find the number of solutions to
$\frac{1}{u}-2u=\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{2}}}{u}}+\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{2}}{u^2}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
$$ \frac{1}{u} - 2u = \frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{2}}}{u} + \left( \frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{2}}}{u^2} \right) $$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
now what?
wow
this is from JEE adv 2022
you could solve it by quadratic
my way would have been to take z= x+iy making the solution really big
yeah
that's the problem
,w \frac{1}{u} - 2u = \frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{2}}}{u} + \left( \frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{2}}}{u^2} \right)
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
solutions are (e^pi)/2 and 1/2
how?
where did r go?
I assumed r=1
you can prove it
rewrite as
[ \f {1 - \f {z^2} {\conj z}} {1 + \f {z^2} {\conj z}} = \f {1 - w} {1 + w} = i, \quad w = \f {z^2} {\conj z} ]
by the calculation we did earlier
ah
(1 - w)/(1 + w) is imaginary iff |w| = 1
yes
with this, you can rewrite the original equation into
[ 1 - z^3 = i(1 + z^3) ]
you can make quick work of this
so that gives me $z^3=-1$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
probably not
$1-z^3=i+iz^3$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
ah
yes
anyway its a cubic so its most likely just 3
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
snoseph
mogged
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\frac{\left(a\sin\left(x\right)+\sin\left(2x\right)\right)}{x^3}$, find the value of a that makes this function continuous at $x=0$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
No value of a does that
The function is undefined no matter what value of a is chosen
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
$\frac{a\left(x-\frac{x^3}{6}\right)+2x-\frac{\left(2x\right)^3}{6}}{x^3}$
so a=1 works
no?
That is not the right Taylor series
,w taylor series of sin(x)
ah
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
it should, though the question is still pretty poorly defined
If you're allowed to add a point (0,c) wherever you want then it's still continuous
@junior flower
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
start with n=2, cuz you need n-1
oh yeah
3
There is no induction to do here
Ah you do still need the n=1 case
Hey let him try induction
I want to see how it goes
yeah but what's a_0?
1, which isn't exactly useful
like showing a_2 is divisible by 3a_1 will not help you to show a_3 is divisible by 3a_2
oh yeah. i'm silly
like you could use base cases to find a general proof though
the derivative of a_3 is 3a_2 /j
ok, so I'll have to prove 2 things here
firstly that the number is divisble by 3
and secondly that it's divisble by $a_{n-1}$
i don't like where this is going
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
yeah
prove 111111111 is divisible by 333 without brute force
took me about 6 seconds
like there is only one thing to realize
no spoilers please
$a_0=1\a_1=111\a_2=111111111\a_3=111111111111111111111111111\\vdots$
no
no
no?
ah
3^n isnt 3n
Flappie
there
sure
Incredible
if you see this its trival 🤓
$a_4=111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111$
Flappie
This is amazing
what are you doing
What’s the next one
Ok but seriously, the first one he sent actually should make sense
This one
from here you should start to see where its going
$a_5 = \foreach \n in {1,...,243}{1}$
yeah, Ive played around with the numbers a bit, getting a rough idea
thewizardofOU
hahaha
@hard umbra u gotta come see this
but if you squint enough, I think with this next one you'll really understand what happens
$a_6 = \foreach \n in {1,...,729}{1}$
:( I cant help without nitro
rafilou2003
@twilit field the question is claiming that every line is divisible by the last one * 3
yes
Can you at least see that it’s divisible by the last one?
I have a conjecture
Ignoring the *3 part
,tex<pgffor>
\gdef\n{111}
\foreach ~ in {1, ..., 5} {
$a_~ = \n$ \
\xdef\m{\n\n\n}
\xdef\n{\m}
}
$a_{6} = \n$
POINT AND LAUGH
Haha snow failed latex
my favourite resolution
$a_{n-1} \cdot \Xi =a_n$
'some natural number'?
How can you tell
I feel like perhaps we shouldn’t use n here
its kind of like placing the previous term back to back 3 times
if they meant k instead then that's the wildest conjecture ever
Quite a valid conjecture though
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
this better?
this is a pretty wild assumption
I feel like they meant like it’s some natural number, we haven’t yet figured out which one
But that’s the conjecture
I've played around with the numbers a bit using WA, seems to work
try looking at a few terms and seeing what theyre divisible by
they're all divisible by 3
like a_3/a_2
"Show that a_n is divisible by 3a_n-1"
"guys I have a conjecture"
or a_4/a_3
This is a definition of an is divisible by an-1
so
have you tried computing a_n/a_n-1 for some values of n?
and see if a pattern arises?
Unironically look at this
And if you can’t see it look at it a bit more
$a_n=10^{3n}+10^{3n-1}....1$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
$a_{n-1}=10^{3n-1}+10^{3n-2}....1$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
are you sure?
uh
with this
one minute
the first one looks fine
$a_{n-1}=10^{3n-3}+10^{3n-4}....1$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
How many digits does this have?
3n?
3n
oh wait, n is used twice
neither is correct then
i thought n was some newly introduced variable, nvm
it shouldn't
It should have 3^n digits
yes, so upto $10^{3n-1}$ would be the place value
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Why?
3n?
where are you getting 3n from?
have you looked at $\frac{a_2}{a_1}$,$\frac{a_3}{a_2}$,$\frac{a_4}{a_3}$ yet?
It seems like it's a bit all over the place
Flappie
not yet
yeah do that asap
always look at that first
Now would be a good time if you still haven’t figured it out
it's like a key to understanding
try doing the long division algorithm instead of using calculator btw
That's if you divide by 111 i think
yes
others are gonna be bit different
Why not?
you mean 1001001?
yes
there's an extra one
that's if I divde by 111
oh
right
yeah, it's 8
so using this I can argue $a_n|a_{n-1}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
though not sure how I'd formally write it
you mean the opposite
well
uh
$a_{n-1}|a_n$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
ah there we go
$\underbracket{123445}_{lol}$
thanks
Flappie
$\underbrace{1...1}_{3^n \text{ times}}$
Flappie
so $\frac{\underbrace{11.......11}}{3^n \text{times}}}{\underbrace{1...1}{3^{n-1} \text{times}}$
$\overbrace{1...1}^{3^n\text{ times}}$
Flappie
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
$\frac{\overbrace{1...1}^{3^n\text{ times}}}{\underbrace{1...1}_{3^{n-1}\text{ times}}}$
Flappie
$\frac{\underbrace{111 \cdots 1}{3^n}}{\underbrace{111 \cdots 1}{3^{n-1}}}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
spoiler boi ||try long division (unironically)||
,rotate
,rotate
not quite with that top part
that's 3n-2 if it wasn't clear
Yeah it was clear, just wrong
idk if anyone mentioned it but it simplifies a lot if you do 111...1 (3^n times) = 111...1 {3^(n-1) times} + 111..1 {3^n - 3^(n-1) times} * 10^(3^(n-1))
one sec let me latex it
should it be n-2 times
No
$\underbrace{111...1}{3^n} =\underbrace{111...1}{3^n - 3^{n-1}} * 1\underbrace{00...0}{3^{n-1}} + \underbrace{111...1}{3^{n-1}}$
artemetra
you get what i am talking about
$111,111,111 = 111,000,000 + 111,000 + 111$
Frosst
yeah exactly
This is the crux of what you should be seeing
yeah, I had that idea, didn't think it would go anywhere, is it actually useful?
yes
It is the main part of the proof
Write the right side in terms of 111 * something
Show that the something is divisible by 3
That’s this
there are 3^n 1(s) so it will be divisible by 3
Then you’re done
wait, what
Well no, this is wrong
Do this
I have to prove $a_{n-1}$ is a factor too
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
You can't just show a_n is divisible by 3 and a_{n-1} and call it a day
My bad I misread
Do this step
Write it out
you mean the left side?
I mean the right side
you should be able to show that $a_n = a_{n-1}10^{2n}+a_{n-1}10^n+a_{n-1}$
Flappie
idk why but i think LTE would work great here
LTE?
3(37000000)+3(3700...)
lifting the exponent
lifting the exponent
$3(3710^6)+3(3710^3)...$
why not show 3a | 9b where a is 3a_n-1 and b is the other
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
If we multiply our string of 1s by 9 we get 10^(3^n)-1
yes
Can you do this first
i dont think thats useful here
(1009009....)(11)
ok it is, ill brb
It literally says * 111
I didn’t pull 111 out of my ass, it’s the last in the sequence to 111 111 111 which is on the left side
111(10^6)+111(10^3)+111(10^0)
Now factorise
$1111(10^6+10^3+10^0)$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
The inside is 1001001
yes
This guy has 3 1’s and the rest are 0’s
which is divisible by 3
The digit sum to 3, it is divisible by 3
We are done
111 111 111 = 111 * something divisible by 3
It should be obvious how this extends to the n case
111111111 111111111 111111111 = 111111111 000000000 000000000 + 111111111 000000000 + 111111111
it will become $111(10^{3n}+ 10^{3n-3}+ 10^{3n-6}....10^0$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
You should be able to extend to this as your general case
No it will not
We want to factorise out the last number in the sequence
yes
We don’t always care about 111, only in the case of 111111111
$\frac{\frac{10^{3^n}-1}{9}}{3\frac{10^{3^{n-1}}-1}{9}}$
use diff of cubes
i forgot the -1s, one sec
the grind
lol that’s a more algebraic approach
i think its simpler
I imagine this as solitaire
But you’re cheating, taking a back portion of a stack out
wait,so $\frac{\frac{10^n-1}{10^{2n}+1}10^n}}{3 * 10^{3n-1}-1}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
$\frac{10^n - 1}{10^{3n} - 1}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
wait
I messed up my Tex
$\frac{\left(10^n-1\right)\left(10^{2n}+1+10^n\right)}{3\left(10^{3n-1}-1\right)}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
why does 3^n keep turning into 3n over and over and over again
this is like the 6th time you've done that
I'm using an external Tex editor, sorry
But this is wrong because you then proceeded like the exponent was 3n instead of 3^n
yeah, my bad, correcting it now
ok, I'm lost, how do I divide this using difference of cubes, I see no cubes here
._.
write 3^n as 3^(n-1)*3
ah, so I have $\frac{\left(10^{3^{n-1}\cdot3}-1\right)}{3\left(10^{3^n-1}\right)}$
?
ok, so that would be
$\frac{\left(10^{3n-1}-1\right)\left(10^{2\left(3n-1\right)}+1-10^{3n-1}\right)}{3\left(10^{3n-1}-1\right)}$
$\frac{\left(10^{3^{n-1}}-1\right)\left(10^{2\left(3^{n-1}\right)}+1-10^{3^{n-1}}\right)}{3\left(10^{3^{n-1}}-1\right)}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
is that right?
Still on this? How
Why not use this?
$\frac{10^{3^{n-1}}\left(10^{3^{n-1}}-1\right)+1}{3}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
I thought an algebric approach would help more
it made more sense
sorry
Sure
could you help from here? have I made a mistake?
What are you trying to show with this
proceeding from here
This is wrong
you did diff of cubes wrong
You did sum of cubes instead of difference of cubes or something
this is the formula I have to use, right?
ah
I see my miskatke
$\frac{\left(10^{2\left(3^{n-1}\right)}+1+10^{3^{n-1}}\right)}{3}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
is this right?
yes
is this supposed to be an easy problem? Feels like the most mindbending thing i've ever seen
i feel like you need someone to wave their hands in front of a blackboard to demonstrate this to you
I guess now I can just say , the ones add up to a number divisible by 3, and thus this is divisble by 3
what do you mean
the solution is supposed to be quite simple but you need to draw it out and stuff
ah
youre familiar with 3|digit sum <=> 3|that number
yes
whats the digit sum of three powers of 10
that's what I've written here
thanks so much everyone!
any resource suggestions?
funnily enough, the polynomial question I asked a few hour ago, was from the same paper 
alcumus on artofproblemsolving
,, \replicate3{\underbrace {111\dots1}} = \underbrace {111\dots1}(1000\dots01000\dots01)
its a good contest math trainer
i think thats whay frosst was trying to say
that's what everyone was trying to say 
yeah, but frosst was trying to do the whole factor out the 11...11
that's also what everyone was trying to do
sorry, I didn't really understand what was going on
can you at least see this
yes
the bracketed thing is divisible by 3 cuz there's 3 1s
yeah, got it
bruh thats literally what i had
you gotta be more visual
I didn't realised, sorry
just written differently
visual
gotta use LTE
lose the experience
Lifting the exponent lemma?
v_3(10^(3^n) - 1) = v_3(9) + v_3(3^n)
ah
so 10^(3^n) is 1 mod 3^(n+2)
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i differentiate this
product rule
how to differentiate the 10cos^2x
@normal plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @normal plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you get the radius
draw it out
we have the following info:
- (-4, 5) is the center
- (-8,8) is a point on the circle
how do we get the distance between two points?
@wraith oriole Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why am i getting 1/4 here? wolfram alpha says 1/2 but im sure i did everything right
do u=x/2
and then you tell me why
you forgot to compensate for that 1/2
this too
wait, cant i just use this formula and replace x with x/2?
no
remember substitution
or how to integrate by substitution
i think i spelt it right
hm ok, i see now, why it is 1/2
remember when you replace dx
you find the relationship between your differentials dx and du by differentiating
i mean, i know how to integrate with subtituion
ig i didnt know how to work with formular in the table 😂
there's no point telling me you can do it if you're not doing it buddy
Closed by @dense tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, im wondering why you post this. You are so close to the answer. Try to use that y>4.
🙂
Yeah so I’m stuck what to do with that. The answer key plugged 4 into the top equation
But I’m confused because since y is anything above 4, can’t you use 7,8, or any number above 4?
Yes you can. But you search for every x s.t. x satisfies the system of equations. for every x > 3 you can find a y so that its true
4x-8>y>4,therefore 4x-8>4
Uhhhh
You used 4
My question is why not any number above 4
hm?
yes
And 4x-8 is bigger than y
yes
Ah I see
so clearly 4x-8 is always bigger than 4
and then solve for x
@grizzled gazelle I had another question for u btw
sure
Is it true, that in every finite-dimensional C-Vectorspace V, if i have a linear map y with y: V-> V with dim(Ker(y))=0, there exists a base of V with eigenvectors of y?


😭😭
He asked that question somewhere lol so I was just messing around but seriously what the heck is that
I don’t understand a word
i know i know
Anyways thanks so much for your help guys I was stuck on this for so long
Have a great rest of your day
Or night
.close
Closed by @wraith oriole
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I'm having a bit of trouble conceptualizing and setting up direct comparison of infinite series and would like help with an example
how do I type latec here
$$
I just sent a photo
okay, so I can see that this respembles a p-series, specifically the divergent harmonic series correct?
so If I where able to prove that the form lets say.... $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2n}}$$ is lesser than or equal to my original series then the origial series diverges
it didnt work
nvm
\infty
ty
穴熊
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Am I taking the correct approach?
well i'm not sure that you'd have to prove that this new series is less than or equal to your first one
but showing that this new one diverges is pretty sensible
I'm trying to do direct comparison
try comparing with 1/n instead of with 1/(2n)
oops wait, that might not work
okay
hang on, i was doing something in my head, might be wrong, lemme write it out haha
sure
can't I just make a tautolgy with 1/(2n)
oh yea 1/(2n) works too, since you have (2n-1) in the denom, not (2n+1)
yea, that works since all those manipulations are reversible
but idk if this is correct
it's correct, your series is termwise larger than those of a divergent series (with all terms positive)
so I found a series that is less than my original series, and it is divergent, therefor I can conclude my given series is divergent. Right?
yep
Closed by @runic wraith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got an answer but it’s 3 times less than the answer given
I have done 9.8x10^-4=(9.0x10^9xq1q2)/.1^2
How do u put it into a picture so it’s easier to read
,calc 0.00098*0.01
Result:
9.8e-6
Times 0.1^2 on both sides
,calc 9.8/9
Result:
1.0888888888889
Then I’m not sure what to do after
Sqrt?
read the start of the second sentence of the problem
wdym
Equally charged so square root to find 2 equal values to get 1.0888…x10^-15
It is 2
$3.3x10^-8$
Storm09
,calc sqrt(1.0888 * 10^(-15))
yea that looks right
Closed by @young spire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i think you can use this, y*cos(30°)=12
how
The cosine of an angle in a right triangle is defined as the ratio of the length of the adjacent side to the length of the hypotenuse.
In this case, the angle you can use to find the value of y is 30°, Cos(30°)=12/y
if you multiply al of this by "y", you get "y*Cos(30°)=12"
y=13.86?
yes
Closed by @uncut topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
did they write cos(x-d)?
then its fine
nopthing else should horizontally shift the function
the thing the teextbook wrote?
yes
if d was -5 then its cos(x+5) which is a left shift by 5, ie |-5|
id d was 5 then its cos(x-5) which is a shift right by 5
im fully aware of that, your point being?
so its less then 0
this is the general case for all functions
so it sohuld shift right
yes
I know
c is negativ
I was saying
when c is negative
it sohuld shift right
and when its positive
oh right
periodic functions are neato like this
wdym
-90 makes it shift to right
but there d is 90, not -90
hm
if it was cos(x+90) then d is -90
what?
cos(x-(-90))
they are defaulting to writing cos(x-d)
so d=90 is a a shift to the right 90 degrees
thats implying
there is a negative sign infront
by default
but isnt d negative
since -90
x--90 is x+90
(x-90) is a shift right, yes d=90
(x-(-90)) is (x+90) a shift left d=-90
yes
thats not contrary to anything, im not sure what the see is for
x-d is a common form but you can do it however you want as long as you understand it
in the one above theyre doing x+d
i most commonly see x-d, but youll likely get a mix
Closed by @pastel dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
10
what's 10
10 is a weird case then...
i would include 0
$0 \leq g(n) \leq 9^{\gamma}$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
ye
I have to show this hold true
9^gamma?
$\gamma$ is the number of digits
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
so say 9999...
that's not 9^4
oh
yes then its true
using powers of ten definitely... Maybe this would be better with an induction argument...
the problem with this idea is that 9^gamma is not always less than your number
you mean more than?
right
so this
i mean the lower bound on n is 10^gamma right
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
it is?
ok, so the inductive argument would be that $g(n) \leq n$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
I have to prove that $g(n+1) \leq n+1$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
mmhm
note you can factor out 10 from most of the digits of n provided n is large enough
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
similarly for 1
the problem is proving this when n+1 ends in 2
I don't think induction is the way here
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
10^gamma(gammath digit)+10^(gamma-1)(gammath-1 digit)...=n
we're trying to bound g(n)
yes
first digit is x10^(gamma -1) i believe
i made the same mistake above lol
so more accurately,
to find the most elegant proof i imagine what i would do if it asked me to prove it for every base
and that made me stop trying to brute force the problem and figure out that you should induct on the number of digits
actually
strong induction on all n fixing gamma?
