#help-49
1 messages · Page 44 of 1
LOL
do u think i should add 69 and 4 or just leave it as fraction
leave as frac
cause it said add x and y right
yeah
yeahh
ok ok
thanks bro
could u help me with 2 or 3 more or na
Closed by @runic thunder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me use FPI to guarantee convergence for the backwared Euler method? PLS
<@&286206848099549185>
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @latent acorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
i got no scoobs what year is this?
lolllll
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @latent acorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no idea how to start this one
I've tried approaching it two ways
both which took
a lot of time
and i got lost with
I let X' = (1, D_i, W_i', D_i (W_i - E[W_i])'
And computing E[XX']^{-1}E[XY]
and i got pretty far
i managed to invert E[XX']
but there was anothe rmatrix i had to invert
and i had such a complicated form for beta
and i had no clue how to use conditional unconfoundedness to simplify it
i then tried doing frisch waugh lovell, but i got stuck in the same way
@mint oriole Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@mint oriole Has your question been resolved?
@mint oriole Has your question been resolved?
@mint oriole Has your question been resolved?
@mint oriole Has your question been resolved?
@mint oriole Has your question been resolved?
@mint oriole Has your question been resolved?
What topic is this?
statistics
Should i skip Algerbra and go strait to AP Geometry
Actuall my asian dad said i should go to AP Physiscs any htoughts
do them all
Algebra, then take calculus and physics at the same time
why calc AND physics?
because a LOT of calculus is used in physics. they go hand in hand. even if you take a ap physics without calculus applications, calculus is still there because a ton of formulas are connected and if you learn calculus youll see how their connected
and to do calclulus, u should know basic algebra 😭 at least
for geometry... uhh... idk
It looks like you need to use conditional unconfoundedness to show both the (Wi - E[Wi]) and the Wi component are uncorrelated with the treatment, which means they have zero effect on beta when you calculate E[e’e]
@mint oriole Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mint oriole
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, im looking for someone whos familiar with Calculus Taylor Series questions
Im studying for an Exam and need recommendations on who to look for online who can teach me how to solve questions like the following:
if need help with a range of topics, try khan academy
Is that free
yes
I just need a dumb down version of how to solve problems like these
Khan academy is a great resource! Also organic chemistry tutor is pretty good for computational problems.
any other individuals on yt ?
Are you looking for a more intuitive/geometric intuition? Or a more computational approach?
Im sorry those words a too big for me lol, I have an exam tmrw I just need to note down step by step how to approach solving those style taylor series problems
Organic chemistry tutor is the way to go!
It offers easy, comprehensive explanations that are geared towards exam-like questions, instead of geometric intuitions.
Hope you ace your exams!
Thank you
@wide dagger Has your question been resolved?
Is it a volume of revolution question?
Its Find volume of solid generated by revolving the region about x axis
This is the only thing im confused about
from (2-x^2)^2 how do you get the 4x^2
Great!
thank you
Np.
So I don't have to do distribution of the ^2 I just do (2-x^2)(2-x^2) to get all 3 of those x^4 - 4x^2 + 4 ?
So you just foil out term by term.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
t
does f(x) = 3 - x^2 and g(x) = x^2
looks like they just used the formula to the right then
exactly what was done
my question is how'd get the 3-x^2 and x^2 inside the brackets
they just substituted f(x) and g(x) into that formula
@wide dagger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
It's the power rule simply
If you differentiate 6x³/3 you end up with 6x²
Will you always make it _x^3/3 ? for any problem ?
if you have x^2 yes
,,\int x^n : \dd x = \frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1} + C \quad n \neq -1
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
it's basically the power rule from differentiation but reversed
yes
in the next step how did they get 1/2 ?
and where did the 6x^3/3 go
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
They applied this
ok got it
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
if it was like the problem in my notebook ill send pic again how would that look like ?
You mean the bounds?
You do upper bound plugged in minus lower bound plugged in
not sure the terminology but like I know for as
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Sorry im writing all these notations down real quick before we continue on that example sorry, the prior example howd the get this second part
why is there no 1/2 for that one
I explained it before.
ok got it, im gonna write all these notes down, is it ok if I tag you once I note down all this if I have further questions about this
sure
ok and you said I could rewrite the expression eitherway for the -2(3/2)3/2 so does that mean it could also be -2(3/2)1/2 ?
this portion
,,\sqrt[a]{x^b} = \left ( \sqrt[a]{x} \right )^b = x^{\frac{b}{a}}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
You can apply these power rules
still little confused so what would you plug into that ?
like how would it look with everything plugged in
what do you want to do here?
im just trying to better understand how the (3/2)^3/2 you get
I know its (3/2)^1/2 when you plugin that formula you gave me
but how does the ^1/2 turn into 3/2
,,\left ( \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \right )^3 = \left ( \left (\frac{3}{2} \right )^{\frac{1}{2}} \right )^3 = \left (\frac{3}{2} \right )^{\frac{1}{2} \cdot 3}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
so what I said here was correct ?
You just have to do 3 * the 1/2
yes
ok
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
i dont understand your question
where is there no ^1/2 or ^3/2 on the otherside ?
they rewrote it
and dragged the minus out
it's this
still confused, why is there no ^1/2 or 3/2 anymore if its that
oh
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
so you can do it either way ?
yea
oh im sorry its the step below that it shows it
my bad
ok now I understand this form of solving the problem
@dawn dagger for this style of problem am I doing that part correct ?
I feel like i am missing something
step 5
uhm you missed the 2nd term
4/3 doesnt go into itself so how would I write that
,,\pi \left [ 4(1) - \frac{4(1)^3}{3} - \left ( 4(-1) - \frac{4(-1)^3}{3} \right ) \right ]
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
dont forget brackets
yep
question for the next step
does it always go to 2 pie ?
is the 2 pie represent the other half that was in the previous step ?
dont see things that way
use logic
the 2 comes from simplifying the other stuff
This simplifies to
,,2 \cdot \left ( 9 \left( \frac{3}{2} \right )^{\frac{1}{2}} - 2 \left( \frac{3}{2} \right )^{\frac{3}{2}} \right )
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
it's like having
got it
here it's like a + a which is also the same as 2a
and you can pull out 2
how do they get this portion and then the solution
whenever I input it into the calculator it gives me a decimal answer
what common factor can you see
3/2 ?
understood, but then what happens to the ^3/2 at the end on the far right
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
how would this be shown with the numbers inputted
still confused with how the 3/2 * 3/2 ?
what
the formula you gave above, what would that look like with the numbers from that problem implemented. The way you explained it before you sent the formula still confused on
they are rules XD
but like didnt the 1/2 go away because it was sqrt
so how would you input the 2(3/2)^3/2 into that formula
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
ok so 3/2^2/2 just equals 3/2
right
now once we reach this point, how do you get 12 pie ?
I understand the sqrt 3/2 stays the same
its 2pie * (9-2*3/2) ?
evalutate the things inside paranthesis
haha
lol I’m sorry I’m slow
nah it's ok
you should try more and experiment i think
that's all
so you discover stuff and get an aha moment
Yeah im running through different problem scenarios for my exam tmrw
@wide dagger Has your question been resolved?
@dawn dagger are you by chance familiar with taylor series
yes kind of
well you need to use the taylor series formula
calculate some derivatives at x = 0
and find a pattern that matches to one of the series
@wide dagger Has your question been resolved?
@wide dagger Has your question been resolved?
It is the form of complex numbers with euler's formula
e^i (angle) = cos(angle) + i sin(angle)
First (image)
then, sin(pi/4) and cos(pi/4) = 1/root2
if you multiply and divide by root2 it becomes root 2 / 2
thank you
the underlined value is integral(vdu)
Is it your question?
the underlined red portion the v is not there as its an unknown
underlined part was found prior to V
sorry for the delay
they have made the equation into x^2 . xe^(x^2) in order to integrate dv easily
how would I find v
integrate dv which is integrate (xe^(x^2))dx
Wowie that's a lot of independent questions
@wide dagger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
By using u = pi - x, what do you get
I did it up to this point but idk what to do after
Do you realise this is $\int_0^{\pi} \pi f(\sin(u)) \dd u + \int_0^{\pi} -u f(\sin(u)) \dd u$
! What the hell am I doing here?
yes i did that too on another page earlier but then got stuck
And also $\int_a^b f(x) \dd x = \int_a^b f(u) \dd u$
! What the hell am I doing here?
oh
I mean, the variable doesn't matter as long as it's the same integral, now does it?
thats right u and x would be the same either way
oh shit makes sense now
ty ty
.close
Closed by @neat sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lim n -> x [(pi * sum i = 1 to n sin((i*pi)/n))/n]
M8732
its not complex i just an index
@bleak pier Has your question been resolved?
ohhhhhh 🫣
@bleak pier Yeah forget about the second comment, it still looks like a Riemann sum though.
@bleak pier Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello! any idea on how to proceed with this?
$\lim_{(x, y)\to(0, 0)} \frac{\sin^2(x + y)}{|x + y|}$
protsac
I know it tends to 0
but I'm a bit at a loss on how to prove it
the denominator makes it so that anything over it will tend to infinity
not really familiar with multivariables, but is it against the rules of multivariable calculus to put x+y=t and go t tends to 0 here?
I would suppose so, yes 😦
the most I've seen is try and use polar coordinates, which is really helpful in x^2 + y^2 cases
as with x = r cos theta and y = r sin theta you get the trig identity
and it suddenly becomes single variable
I suspect this would be based on the squeeze theorem, but I don't know how
in fact, I just saw an argument that would allow to make that substitution
but it feels a bit sloppy
but I think I'll go with that, yes 😁
thank you!
.close
Closed by @midnight linden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
small angle approximation after polar coordinates
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
!rotate
thx
can ya see the mcq
abt the domain
the one having a quadratic equation inside the underrrot
yeah
the ans is d
you basically want to exclude values where it is undefined
what does the U mean there
union
ok what can you say about the domain of a square root function? and what can you say about the domain of 1/x?
its not something for which you should rely on tricks, but still if you insist you can always test some extreme values and eliminate the options which have them
for example you know the denom can be zero for x=1 or x=2
so the options including those if any can get eliminated
but this one is so simple that you dont need any elimination at all, just exclude wherever the things become undefined
but i have to keep track of both the factors of the quadratic
things get tricky there
i can solve other functions which dont have any quadratcics
theres the wavy curve method which can be applied to any factorised expression
for sign analysis
ig ill hav to skip this domain topic
why do you want to skip it
and js pray it doesnt come in my exam tomoro lol
i dont have time to study new methods
is solving (x-1)(x-2)>0 bothering you?
the wavy curve etc
its not too complicated tbh
wont take more than 10 mins
how do i solve it next
and for quadratics i wont even call it a 'method'
muliply it
what do i search on youtube
there are 2 terms multiplied to each other here
the possibilites are:
- one negative and the other positive
- both negative
- both positive
you want cases 2 and 3
yup
meaning x>2 (which automatically makes x>1 )
or x<1 (which automatically makes x<2)
not always no
it all depends on the problem
sometimes the domain can be just one set, or interesection of 2 sets
you can refer this
.close
Closed by @sturdy crystal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help? I found out that X_k = 16 for all k>31 but can't seem to do anything with y
@left pagoda Has your question been resolved?
@left pagoda Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This matrix should be orthogonal. How do I solve this?
Do you know what it means for it to be orthogonal
yes
I get 8 quadrics
4 equations in the form a^2 + b^2 = 3/12
and 4 in the form ac + bd = -19/84
g^2 + h^2 = 3/12
e^2 + f^2 = 23/84
c^2 + d^2 = 53/84
ge + hf = 3/12
gc + hd = -3/12
ce + df = -29/84
@dawn prism Has your question been resolved?
I would just find two other linearly independent vectors from these
Then you know that you have a basis of R4
Which you can reduce to an orthogonal basis using Grahm Schmidt
And then just normalize all your vectors
Might be the most straightforward way
.close
Closed by @dawn prism
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
testing something rq
.close
Closed by @hard shard
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Closed by @hard shard
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yeah
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Calculus 1 question about derivatives
I have this problem and it's a true or false
it says
If f isn't continuous at x=2, then f isn't differentiable at x=2
I'd say no because for a point to be differentiable, it has to be continuous right
you would be correct (assuming you mean that it isn't differentiable).
recall the definition of a derivative
it's a limit
but what is that limit
if you're saying that, then you're agreeing with the statement
yep
true.. I meant true
yeah
if it is a function like this, with the same derivatives from the sides
but not the same limits
it can't be differentiable
Even if it is continuous over R does not mean its differentiable.
generally, since [f'(x)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}], if f'(x) does not exist, then the limit for f(x+h) is different, meaning f is not continuous at x, or f(x) does not exist, which also means f is not continuous, or both.
fish
Closed by @wraith flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me approach this problem
Does CBA denote the angle between CB and BA?
yea
What are you thoughts on this?
i have no idea where to begin
i dont know what formula to use
i dont see how it could help me
its a non-calculator problem
you can try the law of sines
Try and relate to theta
but i dont have 2 angles to use it with
what liek this ?$$ \frac{\sin\theta}{BC}=\frac{\sin BCA}{2} $$
$$ \frac{\sin\theta}{BC}=\frac{\sin BCA}{2} $$
Jakey
Yes
You can simplify the pi part right?
Leaving us with an expression with only pi and theta
so its 3pi/4
The hint that I would give is: AC/sin(pi/4)=2/sin(BCA)
And just find AC in terms of theta
hm ok ill try
like this ? $$ \frac{\sin\frac{\pi}{4}}{AB}=\frac{\sin\left(\frac{3\pi}{4}-\theta\right)}{2} $$
Jakey
hm ok
what is that\
Sorry I mean angle sum
Yes
k ill see what i can get
$$ \frac{2\sin:\frac{\pi}{4}}{AB}=\sin:\frac{3\pi}{4}\cdot\cos\theta-\cos:\frac{3\pi}{4}\sin\theta $$
Jakey
theres no way thats solvable
3pi/4 is a special angle.
ive never seen it
is it on the unit circle
omg waut
im stupid
i got it lemme try again
ok i got part a
ill attempt part b
Sure. Do you need any help for part (b)?
Sure.
k thanks\
ok @stable owl i got this as the derivative
$$ -2\left(\cos:\theta+\sin:\theta\right)\left(-\sin:\theta+\cos\theta\right)=0 $$
Jakey
which means (cos+sin)=0 and -sin+cos=0
so i got the angles
$$ \theta=\frac{\pi}{4}\frac{3\pi}{4}\frac{5\pi}{4}\frac{7\pi.}{4} $$
Jakey
I don't think your derivative is correct?
Use quotient rule.
dont i just need chain rule
$$ -2\left(\cos:\theta+\sin:\theta\right)^{-2}\left(-\sin:\theta+\cos\theta\right)=0 $$
Jakey
Sure.
ok i expanded to get
$$ \frac{-2\left(-\sin:\theta:+\cos\theta\right)}{\cos^2+cos\theta\sin:\theta+\sin^2}=0 $$
Jakey
would it be ok to completly get rid of the bottom
cuz i can just times both sides by it
Just set its derivative to 0
yes yes
Also, consider the restriction to the answer.
what restriction
So, the answer above by setting the derivative to 0 gives us infinetely many possible solutions
The derivative has infinite number of roots.
im not understanding what your getting at
However, since we are restricted to a triangle the angle must be less than pi/2.
nvm
Yes I do think I can be obtuse
but your right it cant be more than pi
yes.
are you willing to help with another problem
Sure.
Which part are you struggling with?
part a, i dont know how im supposed to solve the function when i set it to 0
$$ \sin x=\sqrt3\cos x $$
Jakey
that doesnt seem possible
Yes it is.
unless im missing comething agian
Notice that, if you divide by cosx you can tanx.
Do you know the special triangles?
like 30 60 90 and 45 45 90?
Yes. Which one do we use now?
Yup. Let's use the convention of radians.
i think
For the sake of this question.
ok
So, let's draw out a triangle such that the tan(of some angle) is sqrt(3). What would it look like? What would be angle be?
the opposite would be sqrt 3 and adjacent 1
Yup.
Not quite.
Yup!
So, pi/3
Notice that, pi/3+2pik, for all positive integers of k, would give us sqrt(3)
Yes.
so those are the coordinates
Yes.
That is the x-coordinate
You have to include y as well
Give it in the form of (x,y)
Instead of just x=...
ok thanks
Do you need help with other parts of the question as well?
nah i should be good for this one
yeah on another problem im confused a little
but i still need to finish this one
do you want me to ask you my question anyuway?
ok for this one
when i am finding g(x) is it just 2.5 or 10.5
like
$$ 4\sin\frac{\pi}{8}\cdot\left(x-10.5\right)+12 $$
Jakey
i dont know if i am shifting a whole new function or just f(x)
cuz it doesnt say f(x) is shifted right any
i also need help with (c)
cuz i stopped when i was confused there
Which part are you struggling on?
(b) ii
the question is above
what im struggling on
@stable owl
😠
😭
its ok
.close
Closed by @dusk rover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it wrong ?
X^(1/4)
No
It’s correct
@gentle pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is he doing here
just balancing it
5 newtons
You can see it in the diagram
The resultant force is 14-9 which is in downward direction
ohh ok
i think of it as the 5n crosses out the 5n on the 10n as an equilibrium thing is that right?
just 10-5
ohok
Kinda, but equilibrium is when forces cancel each other out completely, here u have some left out force
yes
It's called a resultant
Closed by @normal plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please use induction to solve this problem, if possible. Prove that k^(2^n) -1 is divisible by 2^(n+2). K is an odd number
Start by proving the base case
wym
@small jasper Has your question been resolved?
the base case is n=1
.close
Closed by @small jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi is correct to ask for help here?
@uncut echo Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
All the questions?
Wait let me check
Ok thanks! I also need some help on some other questions after this one. Thank you so much
what?
Are my response in the images correct?
Here
Ah ok, how can I ask for help from people?
@uncut echo Has your question been resolved?
@uncut echo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@gloomy socket Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@gloomy socket Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@gloomy socket Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@gloomy socket Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @gloomy socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please help me, I am not sure I am correct...
pretty please,
@proven ice Has your question been resolved?
@proven ice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I have a problem with this limit
Can u help me pls?
@sinful socket Has your question been resolved?
question so big nobody even trying
:(
I'm in grade 10 so I won't even try
aaah ok, no problem bro
<@&286206848099549185>
@sinful socket Has your question been resolved?
@sinful socket Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @sinful socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$y=ln(tanx)$ where X $\in ]0,\frac{\pi}{4}]$ then $\frac{dy}{dx}$=
Joeller
now I know that the derivative of ln is $\frac{f(x)'}{f(x)}$
Joeller
but the answer is a lil different and I wanna know how to get to that answer
there are often many ways to express trig things
the answer is 2csc2x
and what do you have?
$\frac{sec^2}{tan}$
Joeller
\LaTeX{} tip: there are macros to properly format special functions, like \( \ln(\tan x)) \).
I tried something but got a different answer
well i don't immediately see how to convert one to the other, but let's just check if those are equal
Invariance
,w plot {sec^2 x / tanx, 2 csc(2x) }
they are
try converting to sin and cos
I tried something and ended up with sec(x)csc(x)
that also seems to be equal
hayley table
I'm still a little confused
i can try explaining if youd like
sure
sec^2 x is equal to 1/cos^2 x
yes
tan x = sinx/cosx
yep
yeahh
youre left with 1/cosxsinx
then multiply by 2 ?
then you can multiply by two and divide by two
yeah
to get 2/2sinxcosx
which is 2/sin2x
yes
which is then 2csc2x
yeah np
.close
Closed by @cunning bobcat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Because AT is perpendicular to plane of ABF
Closed by @red cave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is (3, 2) the point of inflection?
hi pixel
@wooden knoll Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wooden knoll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve b
You have to show that Un+1 > Un for all n
pirateking0723
but now i am thinking about how to show that dividing the rhs of this inequality by 2 wont affect the inequality
idk if this is the correct/best way to approach this problem
so if this isnt the correct approach then correct me please
and if it is correct then help me proceed into the next step
<@&286206848099549185>
@safe orioleYou can show that Un+1 - Un > 0 for all n
@worldly peak how
bro pls
how will i do this
@safe oriole Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
Square both sides
And note that if $0\le U_n \le 1$ then:
[U_n\ge U_n^2]
@safe oriole
Max
or you can just prove the function (sqrt(1-x)/2)-x >0 with all 0<x<1
both sides of U_n=sqrt(...)?
Yea
so $U_n\geq\frac{1+U_{n-1}}{2}$
pirateking0723
now because $u_{n-1}\le1$ make a lower bound. (Btw the left hand side should be $u_n^2$)
Max
why u_n^2 should be on left hand side i just substituted u_n^2 according to this so on RHS
so how can we proceed from here
@safe oriole Has your question been resolved?
Okay so squaring both sides gives:
[ U_n^2\geq\frac{1+U_{n-1}}{2}]
Then using that $0\leq U_n\leq 1$ we have:
[ U_n^2\geq\frac{1+U_{n-1}}{2}\geq \frac{U_{n-1}+U_{n-1}}{2}=U_{n-1}]
In short
[U_n^2\geq U_{n-1}]
The crux is realising that because $0\leq U_n\leq 1$ then $U_n\geq U_n^2$
[U_n\geq U_n^2\geq U_{n-1}]
Max
@safe oriole hope that helps
Closed by @safe oriole
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $x_1, x_2..$ be non negative real numbers such that $\sum_{i=1}^{2024}x_i=1$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Find with proof
the maximum and minimumvalues of the expression
$\sum_{i=1}^{1012}x_i+\sum_{i=1013}^{2024}x_i^2$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
This is suppsoed to be solvable by highschoolers
high schoolers better start learning about lagrange multipliers then
💀
This is probably just playing arounf and estabilishing boundaries around square terms and stuff
mind elaborating ?
I think the maximum is pretty easy to do
First find a bound, and then show it is satisfied by some specific example
how would I do that
Intutively, it's 1
When you square a number it will get smaller
What happens when you square a number that's between 0 and 1?
it gets smaller
So the total can't possibly be bigger then 1 using squares
I think for the min it's the same trick
||For min you would put all the sum in the squared terms||
Maybe spoiler that
between 0 and 1, right?
Yes, but there's something better
Not a constant
As we said, squaring a number thats between 0 and 1 makes it smaller
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
this line of thinking is not very good me thinks… if you were trying to minimize x + y^2 subject to x + y = 1, x,y >= 0, you wouldn’t put everything into y, would you?
Why not
A
Wait
Ok that's not what I did
with some weight on x
It's not similar mb
||x + y^2 >= x^2 + y^2 >= 1/2||
I meant its similar as in the idea of how you use the inequality
none of this makes much sense to me tbh
Ok so,
You have the number 1
You want to split it into 2024 parts, and then take the second half of the values and square them
To maximize the expression, it's best to give the parts you DON'T square more weight
That's because squaring makes the number smaller
If you want to write it down using variables, this is basically just:
hmm, so this is sort of like statistics
x_i^2 <= x_i for all 1 <= i <= 2024
So:
$\sum_{i = 1}^{1012} x_i + \sum_{i = 1013}^{2024} x_i^2 \geq \sum_{i = 1}^{1012} x_i + \sum_{i = 1013}^{2024} x_i$
RedstonePlayz09
Literally just replacing all squared terms with x_i
And what do you get on the right hand side?
1
i don’t think this is tight enough. the actual min of x + y^2 there is 3/4
What is a simple example that actually gives 1 as the value?
Is it not?
Can you give an example where it's smaller
Wait what
all numbers in the sequence but one are 0
well it should be on you to give me an example where x + y^2 is 1/2
