#help-49
1 messages · Page 29 of 1
i did
Lhs you get |10-2y|
RHS you get e^{x+ln(6)}
Which I trust you can simplify
Bro I’m going brain dead
I remember I did like 13 ap frqs in one day
Cuz I waited till the last day
ew oh m ygod
i was super sick so i decided to leave everything
and im left with this 😭😭😭
We move cuz if you don’t know absolute value
Im@not bouta teach you
Sorry
Bro stop 😭
😭😭😭😭
I’m still tryna find hamidur on Reddit
im sorry if this sounds stalkerish but we have a mutual omg
How do you know gabe wtf
Gabe saved my life
omg 😭😭
Basically we were both in Columbia and this guy was tryna mug me
And then gabe gave the 2-3 mayweather
Guy ran away
OH he asked me if i wanted to join you guys like a while ago
DAMNNNN
go gabe
🥳🥳🥳
im not super close with him though i just talked to him for like a little bit
You should get close
And do his hw
yale and cant do algebra 2 😭😭😭 cooked
isn't he doing linear algebra
hellllllllll no im struggling with AP CALC 😭😭😭
Anyway we focus on the last q
alralr
Do NOT sell
i will TRY
nah i had to decline
i didn't get a scholarship
decling yale. insane.
Insane where you going now
Nah go to Yale
im not getting any financial help so i can't afford it
Financial aid office go and beg
im gonna be eating sugar soup for breakfast lunch and dinner
I DID AND THEY SAID NO 😭😭😭😭
OK ANYWAYS
Give me 30% of ur income for 30 years and I’ll pay for 2 years of Yale
Income after taxes
for the particular solution y = f(x) found in part c, find lim x-> inf f(x)! 🤓🤓
ok sharktankkk
idk yale sstill on my list but 😭😭 ill see eventually
Nah im not helping you if ur throwing away ur future
You could go to uni with Gabe!
he mgiht not even go to yale
bro is thinking of doing 6 majors
crazy
and i only got in because of my ECs and essay so like i wouldn't be able to compete with other people
Aight let me help you with ur problem
And I’ll have a lil chat
ok thank you 🙏
Y = - (e^{x+ln(6)} - 10)/2 and the positive one???
Should be like 5 or -5
Mhm
oops
where did it go wrong
2y-10 = e^{-x+ln(6)}
oh thank you
If you went to yale, you would have got a tutor who would catch that mistake
STAWP
Anyway you go to yale
you're right but i just cant afford anything 😭😭😭
Make a lotta money and donate it to the math server
smart
I’ll pay the tuition for %
👎
bad risk for you
i feel like i wouldn't have enough motivation at yale either so i wouldn't do very well
Aight
Say good things about me to gabe and Neil
I’ll cya
Alright cyaa
@radiant gorge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @radiant gorge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
From this drawing what can x be
A)10 B)20. C)40. D)50. E)110
b
Actually it’s b
has to equal more than 90 but less than 180
Because 180-5x is an angle in that other triangle
90 is a square
n that angles bigger
180 is a line
n that angle is smaller
@kind sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The first condition tells you that Adrian's favorite number contains 5 digits, all odd, and that none of the digits are repeated. Meaning that the number is just the digits 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 arranged in some order. That should be enough to get you started, then you can use this information in combination with the next two clues to figure out which order the numbers have to be in.
okay thank you
.close
Closed by @magic orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me do 7 fully
idk how to start or how to do any steps
a/b=c/d thereforr ac=bd
whats a b c d
representing the equations
?
the linear and quadratic equations in your question
Also you should notice how x^2 - 4 can be factored into (x-2)(x+2)
so like i said earlier idk how to do any steps and idk what a b c d
how did you solve the questions before this?
<@&286206848099549185>
you have to do something called cross multiplying
how would 1 do that
any time you have two fractions equal to each other you multiply the denominators to the numerators of the opposite side of the equation
someone has already labelled a picture with a b c and d for you
who?
.
to cross multiply you shuold have a x d on one side and b x c on the other side of the equal sign
or you just can two diagonal arrows if it helps you better visualize without thinking of letters
ok i did axd and bxc wat would i do next
now that you dont have any fractions you can bring everything to one side of the equals sign and make the other side 0
so rearrange your equation to get a quadratic
and then factor to find roots of x
u lost me
what do you have
how do i this cause i have axd and bxc
cause there 2 diffent things
multiply the bottom left with the top right
and the bottom right with the top left
thats called cross multiplying
ohhh they equal each other ok
yes
what do you wanna do in this equestion? find value of x?
thats where i was lost
this isnt my question but i assume yes find x
just say slove rational equations
cross multiply the equation first
then on the right hand side you'll find (x2 - 4)(x + 1)
2^2 = 4
(x2 - 2^2)(x + 1)
im caught up to here
or 3(x+2)(x-2)=(x^2 - 2^2)(x+1)
yea it makes sense
on left hand side use identity x2 - y2 = (x + y)(x - y)
how would i do that since it has a x^3
where?
This math video tutorial shows you how to factor trinomials the easy fast way. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems for you to work on including factoring trinomials when the leading coefficient is 1 (a=1) and when it's not 1. This video will also help you to solve quadratic equations by factoring and by using the quadr...
wait lemee send you my solution
these are all x^2
i forgot wat it called but ik how to get it down to x^2 just kinda a pain
is it okay?
I think it is
pretty sure you hve a mistake in second line
.
no
tbh its not very good to solve these kinds of questions like that
you really should be bringing everything to one side, making the other side 0 and then factoring to solve
you are crossing out the factor (x+2) and pretending its not relevant but it is
hence youre missing one of the roots x=-2
well if the equation is easy to solve then it's stupid to make it hard
the way hes been teaching me has been super easy
(disclamer:- dont use this advise on your maths test)
that's nice
bro
just factor by grouping and solve for x
if you havent learned that in class then maybe dont worry about it and just ask your teacher
but with these questions just cross multiply then simplify and sovle
ight would the answer just be 2
no it shuld be -2 and 2
right right i forgot x^2-4 could be 2 or -2
.close
Closed by @ivory stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what no
same chapter of yours
do you know the calculations of log?
do you get 4 —> 2 and increase the power by 1
not allowed to use log
pure algebra
IGCSE
3
you sure?
yes
Okay
what's 4^2x? do you know how to transform it into the form of 2^a?
well
a^2b =(a^2)^b
this is a required skill before this question
for example
16=2^4=(2^2)^2
Okay that makes sense
try it
One second
ping me when you're done
yeah, you have to try to transform 4^2x into the form of 2^a
so that you can combine the seperate terms
I don’t know how else to do this
4 is 2^2
yes
also, you missed the coefficient before x
which is
uhh, dont you wanna try it out?
No I’ve been trying these two questions since the morning
it’s 7PM now
4^2x=(2^2)^2x=2^4x
that doesn’t make that much sense tho
it does
use the first formula
here
so 2^5x??
👍
2^5 is 32?
yeah
Next?
find the value of x
how 💀
so.. I start guessing??
that's what you do without log
yeah, start from 2
There’s gotta be a more efficient method than guessing 💀
Also how is the examiner gonna accept that 💀
yes there are
and
transform 128 into 2^a
forget this, I just realized x isn't an integer XD
yes
yeah 💀
solve x
How
you have everything you need
bro, do you write down what we have done so far?
it appears that you have written down nothing
yeah, you have 2^5x = 2^7
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @jolly storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
hello
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to make it C = f(C) so I can solve it by the iteration method ?
multiply both sides by C and divide by v(t)
yes, it's the same thing as i was saying
you get $C=40\cdot(1-e^{-(C/68.1)\cdot 10})$
artemetra
@frozen tree Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frozen tree
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the degree of this equation?
Can we transpose the sin x then take the arccos of both sides
<@&286206848099549185>
can someone please assist me with this question
Not defined
Because it canr be expanded as a polynomial
arccos(cosx)=x only when x lies inbetween 0,π
So that equatiom wouldn't be completely accurate
For all x
if i define it say piece-wise? is that allowed?
i mean if i add or subtract pi or pi/2's multiples? is that something we can do?
i'm not sure tbh
Even if you do it'd be outside of the range
no like if i say dy/dx = arccos(everything else) + npi
Best of luck for boards btw heard you guys have only 3 days for maths
yeah thanks
Yeah that's right, but again in the equation they've given us, how they've written it matters
If it were in this way Id say pick 1
okay
im just confused how this is different from ln(dy/dx) = x+ y
Another book said arcsin(dy/dx) = x + y has a degree of 1
@half granite Has your question been resolved?
so they take sin of both sides
oh yeah i forgot about that
how is degree defined then??
power to which the highest order derivaive is raised
@half granite Has your question been resolved?
@half granite Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i properly and mathematically divide the 13 by the 6/5 ratio?
hey so when you wanna divide 13 by 6/5 you're basically flipping the fraction and multiplying so it's like 13 times 5/6 do that and you get 65/6 which rounds to about 10.83 if you wanna keep it super simple just remember dividing by a fraction is like multiplying by its opposite
Ah ok
Closed by @final sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let ( A = \begin{pmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \
a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \
a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33}
\end{pmatrix} ), such that ( \det(A) = 7 ).
\bigskip
Calculate the determinants of the following matrices.
\bigskip
i) ( \begin{pmatrix}
a_{11} & 2a_{12} & -a_{13} \
a_{21} & 2a_{22} & -a_{23} \
a_{31} & 2a_{32} & -a_{33}
\end{pmatrix} )
\bigskip
ii) ( \begin{pmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \
a_{21} + 3a_{11} & a_{22} + 3a_{12} & a_{23} + 3a_{13} \
ka_{31} & ka_{32} & ka_{33}
\end{pmatrix} )
milanesa a caballo
@past aurora
What have you tried?
Do you know about some properties of the determinant?
I have tried nothing, I have 0 idea.
does one property comes to your mind?
Do you know what happens to the determinant, if you perform row/column operations on A?
For example, what happens if I multiply the first row by a scalar
How does that affect the determinant? Do you know that?
No
I'm assuming a is the matrix
I suggest capitalizing the letter when it's a matrix
But also that's not true
k * A where A is a matrix is multiplying EVERY entry by k.
det(A*k) = k*det(A)
Again, that's false
Are you learning using a book maybe?
If you do have a book, it should clearly states the ways the determinant is affected
A' is the resultant matrix after multiplicating one row of A by a scalar K
being $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$
milanesa a caballo
Right
what now?
So you understand this?
spanish . . .
Yeah I assumed so
So you understand that multiplying one row by a scslar, also multiplies the determinant by that scalar
Meaning, if B is the matrix you get after multiplying a row in A by a scalar c, then: det(B) = c * det(A)
Okay,
Now in the first exercise we have something similar
yes . . .
Notice the differences, we multiplied the second column by 2 and the third column by -1
But those are columns and not rows
So what can we do to turn them into rows?
?
Try to think
not sure
I am not following.
Well just answer this...
I really don't think I'm asking for much
Does it mention anything about columns?
2 talks about swapping rows
3 is just summing a multiple of one of the elements of A so called A' then same determinant
im confused.
[
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & 2a_{12} & -a_{13}\
a_{21} & 2a_{22} & -a_{23}\
a_{31} & 2a_{32} & -a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{21} & a_{31}\
2a_{12} & 2a_{22} & 2a_{32}\
-a_{13} & -a_{23} & -a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
]
RedstonePlayz09
Do you see why this is true? I just transposed the matrix
So the determinant stays the same
?
I dont see why is this true. but I can accept that $det(A) = det(A^t)$ and live with it.
milanesa a caballo
Okay, that's enough for me
Later you can go over the proof for this if you feel like you want to
Okay, so I'm gonna continue:
. . . please continue . . .
RedstonePlayz09
So again, you see what I did?
The theorem in your book says, that if you get A' by multiplying a row by a scalar, then det(A') = c * det(A) where c is that scalar
It doesn't say "every" row
Just a single row
Soooo we continue:
. . .
[
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & 2a_{12} & -a_{13}\
a_{21} & 2a_{22} & -a_{23}\
a_{31} & 2a_{32} & -a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{21} & a_{31}\
2a_{12} & 2a_{22} & 2a_{32}\
-a_{13} & -a_{23} & -a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
=2
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{21} & a_{31}\
a_{12} & a_{22} & a_{32}\
-a_{13} & -a_{23} & -a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
=-2
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{21} & a_{31}\
a_{12} & a_{22} & a_{32}\
a_{13} & a_{23} & a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13}\
a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23}\
a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
]
oh its because its too long
. . .
RedstonePlayz09
can you elaborate
$\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & 2a_{12} & -a_{13}\
a_{21} & 2a_{22} & -a_{23}\
a_{31} & 2a_{32} & -a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{21} & a_{31}\
2a_{12} & 2a_{22} & 2a_{32}\
-a_{13} & -a_{23} & -a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
=2
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{21} & a_{31}\
a_{12} & a_{22} & a_{32}\
-a_{13} & -a_{23} & -a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}$
$
=-2
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{21} & a_{31}\
a_{12} & a_{22} & a_{32}\
a_{13} & a_{23} & a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13}\
a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23}\
a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
$
. . .
WHY IS THERE A MINUS
RedstonePlayz09
that property about the minus sign, I am confused.
good enough
only one row is multiplied by -1 . . .
?

the determinant gets multiplied by it aswell
what about ii) now. . .
anyways you gotta transpose it back
transpose, take out 2 and -1, transpose back
and u get -2det(A)
so -14
Ok?
milanesa a caballo
elaborate.
Where?
oh, first of all.
take a look at second row, this means we can whipe out the "+ x"
because the determinant doesnt change at all in the second row scenario.
yeah
You can subtract -3 * the first row
and it reverts whatever they did
and determinant doesn't change
what now.
[
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13}\
a_{21} + 3a_{11} & a_{22} + 3a_{12} & a_{23} + 3a_{13}\
ka_{31} & ka_{32} & ka_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13}\
a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23}\
ka_{31} & ka_{32} & ka_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
]
RedstonePlayz09
ok?
yes.
Can you try to continue from here?
k * 9?
Look again
And I'm pretty sure you aren't supposed to find k, there is no way to find it. Just take it as a parameter.
,,k \cdot \begin{vmatrix}
a{11} & a{12} & a{13}\
a{21} & a{22} & a{23}\
a{31} & a{32} & a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}
milanesa a caballo
What you have now is just k * det(A)
yes.
yes
Closed by @past aurora
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Np
cya.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How should I approach c?
Closed by @prisma swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i work out 19.a
Closed by @echo grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I have proven that when the geometric mean is maximized, it it is less than or equal to the arithmetic mean, does it follow that the geometric mean is always less than or equal to the arithmetic mean? I can provide my proof of the first part if needed.
Would like to see your proof
I think I made a mistake in the proof now that I am looking back at it but here it is.
The problem was to prove that the geometric mean is leq to the arithmetic mean for postive real numbers x_1, ... x_n with Lagrange multipliers
I actually just switched the less than or equal at the end to equal, so my question is now if I have proven that the geometric mean is equal to the arithmetic mean at the geometric mean's maximum, is it always less than or equal to the arithmetic mean?
Should I also prove that the minimum of the arithmetic mean is geq the geometric mean? (unsure if this would validate the proof or if its necessary)
@stable dawn
Try pinging helpers,I'm not that familiar with this proof.
<@&286206848099549185>
Sorry
All good!

@craggy cosmos Has your question been resolved?
Didn't realize this section was for pre-university math questions lol, don't want to occupy a spot so i'll close it
.close
Closed by @craggy cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is possible for anyone to solve this?
@waxen needle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @waxen needle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am looking for an explanation/proof(?) for something regarding square roots.
when it comes to division of square roots there is a rule stating that √16 / √4 = √16/4
why does this work? why is it true? I've tried rewriting these expressions and breaking it down into its "simplest form" but i still can't wrap my head around it. Also is there a name for this property of square roots?
$\frac {\sqrt a}{\sqrt b} = \sqrt {\frac ab}$
Stephen
this right
well you can think of roots as fractional exponents, then the rules just follow the rules for addition and subtraction of exponents
yeah
$(a^n)(b^n) = (ab)^n$
Soosh
right? and (a/b)^n = a^n / b^n you can distribute exponents over multiplication or division, are you comfortable with that idea already?
i do understand what you are saying about exponents, however i dont quite get how you could think of a square root as a fractional exponent? what would say the square root of 9 look like if it had a fractional exponent?
$\sqrt{9}=9^{\frac{1}{2}}$
Soosh
ok just take this and like square both sides, that can show you why they are equivalent because on the left when you square, the ^2 exponent can be used on both the numerator and denominator individually and you get a/b, while on the right you square and you get a/b
@old lark Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @old lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would I prove $x^3+x^2+4x$ and -sin(2x) only have one sol
Why am. I here
it's obvious that 0 is one sol
but how would I prove that's the only sol?
by proving their difference is never 0(so by taking the derivative of their difference and proving it's monotonic?
that question is not properly constructed.
A polynomial has no solutions. It has roots.
Do you mean x^3 + x^2 + 4x = 0?
start by factoring. What do you get?
do you mean x^3+x^2+4x=0 or =-sin(2x)
=sin(2x)
should have been clearer, sorry
you could compare the derivatives
how would that help?
If it's strictly increasing or decreasing, only one solution
Why am. I here
Yes
now the minmum value of this derivative is 2
so it's an increasing function
thanks
it's a cubic. It covers all reals
I know
yeah, thanks!
Its still important during other problems
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i approach this?
<@&286206848099549185>
consider logarithm
Closed by @half granite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where does x^(i-1) come from?
@next sluice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i just show an example, k = 1, so n = 1 which is not divisible by 3 or 7?
thanks
yes
Closed by @modern marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
been stuck for a while on what looks like a basic geometry problem : OIA is equilateral with side 1, OB = CD = 1. i want to show AD = cbrt(2).
i've shown AID is a right triangle, this implies BI = sqrt(3)
there must be some similar triangles around but i can't figure out where
@hot fox Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> if anyone has a clue
hint: ||menelaus' theorem||
Closed by @hot fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello can someone please recommend me good videos or books for Clifford algebra?
@uneven sandal Has your question been resolved?
@uneven sandal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @uneven sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uh well
still can't figure it out
i've tried applying the theorem to OAC, which gives
$\frac {BO} {BA} \frac {IC} {IO} \frac {DA} {DC} = 1$
Gio'
good
well i know $ID = \sqrt{1 - AD^2}$
Gio'
but not much about IC
i would need angle IDC
it looks like i'm going to have the same problem since i need to show IC = 2^(2/3)
there are still more equation you can make
hmm
my bad it's AD^2 - 1
so the altitude from D to OC has length $\frac {\sqrt 3} 2 \sqrt {AD^2 - 1}$
Gio'
i really don't see how i can show this
which ones were you thinking about ?
you have two option here
at least imo, that i think are fairly nice
- ||menelaus theorem again||
- ||law of cosine||
well i've tried 1. in AIC but i would need an extra point on (AI)
about 2. there's an angle i'm missing
i know nothing about IAC
which triangles would you apply these in ?
@feral sedge
for menelaus approach u have exactly 1 remaining option
for loc approach u apply it in a triangle where u already have the central angle
hmm
triangle ABD ?
i get AC = sqrt(3) / ID
is correct equation
wait i think i've got it
AD is solution of a polynomial equation of degree 4
gotta factor that out
and i'll be good
it works !!
thank you so much @feral sedge you saved my day
.close
Closed by @hot fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi!! I need some help using the solver function on my calculator, I am trying to solve this equation (I will send a screenshot with my teacher's notes) but when I input it into solver I get -3.33
is that 35 or 3s
3s
,w solve 4*10^(-38)=s(3s+10^(-7))^3
sure
let me get my ipad rq 1 sec
I did extra parenthases when normal parenthases didn't work either
it's negative btw the black square covers that
see its at the top
how do I get the solution that I need
what parameters can you input
curious what happens if you choose x=1
hm, im honestly not sure
thank you so much btw
Closed by @wide flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
multiply by (a+b)/(a+b)
you have a-b for reference
should be able to work some magic after
ohhh
can i send pics here
i wana send u it so ik if i got it right
its alot of writing lol
thats good right
i got stuck on this one now
i hate when the limits have trig stuff in it
the limit
oh im high
nvm me, youre good
what do i start out with
@silk grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct?
Yes
what rule is this?
Walk us through your thought process. Why are you getting this?
U differentiated the exponent , and put infront
okay well
He's using the x² method prob lol
well the +3 should be multiplied by -t
making it -3e
and the -t should be reduced 1
to -2e
So this is how you'd differentiate a polynomial. But this isn't a polynomial
oh
Know the derivative of y = e^x?
Bingo! We can use that, and the chain rule, to get the derivative of e^(-x)
Yea
We're differentiating e^(-x) with chain rule.
As always when you do chain rule, you want to identify:
- The outside function
- The inside function
What are they here?
@strange barn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
having major trouble w calc!
im not sure how to take the integral with two boundries
because i need to put a boundary on the y axis at y=1 and i also need to put a boundary on the x axis at x=e but I can only use one set of variables in the integral
fs
for sure
.close
Closed by @gilded spire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help yall i got -14/3u+1/3v…answer must be in decimal or integer form so i answered in decimal form but its still incorrect
@fair tangle Has your question been resolved?
@fair tangle Has your question been resolved?
@fair tangle Has your question been resolved?
Well just from looking I think your answer is wrong
-14/3 u would point way off to the left
Just redo the calculations
these are my calculations
bruh
that was a stupid mistake
do you notice anything else wrong with my math
okay i just redid the question it’s correct thank you
@fair tangle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you find the limit at inf here 🧍♂️
for $f(x) = x^x$ ?
tobi
They want the limit of f’(x)
As x goes to infinity
Which clearly goes to infinity
yeah
.close
Closed by @dim totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find the number of triplets $(a_1,a_2,a_3$ that exist such that $a_1+a_2\cos\left(2x\right)+a_3\sin^2\left(x\right)=0$
Why am. I here
I solved it by using the fact that $-1+2sin^2(x)=-cos(2x)$
Why am. I here
and then saying then using that fact that this is still true if the whole equation is multiplied by a non-zero scalar multiple
however, my book has established relationshipse between $a_1,a_2,a_3$
Why am. I here
why is that needed
what kind of relationships
like $a_1=-a_3/2=a_2$
Why am. I here
that seems to be roughly in line with the identity you wrote down
can you post your whole solution and the solution from the book?
well for the whole equation to = 0, you need the coefficients of the sin^2 x terms to equal 0 and also the coefficients of the other random floating terms to = 0, seems like what you used is a good start
I may get into legal trouble for that, so I'd rather not sorry
that's pretty much it
there are some additional statments, like the conclusion
but that's all
for posting a picture?
so you can rewrite using what you said as:
a1 + a2(1-2sin^2x) + a3 sin^2 x = 0
now you have
a1 + a2 - 2a2sin^2x + a^3sin^2x = 0
for this to be 0 you need
a1 + a2 = 0
-2a2 = a3 i guess, this seems to be what the solution is
yeah, I'm very paranoid, sorry
got it. Thanks!
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
sorry again
nothing wrong with “being paranoid” but it should be noted that realistically nobody is going to get you in trouble for posting a page out of a resource you don’t own (people do this all the time in this server)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone verify whether my approach for showing that this is an equivalence relation is transitive is correct. The equivalence relation is defined on the group (G,*) Two elements a and b in the group G are considered equivalent if there exists an element h in G such that h * a * h’ = b. Suppose we have h * a * h' = b and h' * b * h'' = c. Can we equate these expressions as follows:
h * a * h' = h' * b * h''
Then, by left-multiplying with h' and right-multiplying with h, we get:
h' * h * a * h' * h = h * h' * b * h' * h
Since h' * h is the identity element e, we obtain:
e * a * e = b * e * e
As the neutral element e does not change the expression, we have:
a = b
Given that b is equivalent to c and a equals b, it follows that a is also equivalent to c.
you need to show that if a is equiv to b and b is equiv to c, a is equiv to c. i.e., show there exists g in G such that gag' = c
also, you cannot assume that the h such that hah' = b is the same as the one such that hbh' = c. those values may be different