#help-49
1 messages · Page 15 of 1
negation of (4 does not divide a and b)
hmhm
is (4 divides a or 4 divides b)
yh
"and" becomes "or"
yh
wdym with "yh"?
i don t know english very well, but i think its a compliment
basically i let you know that i read your message
imma send a pic of the proof i wrote, tell me what you think
this lokks fine
but idk if the first statement is the converse of the second one
so
the first statement is original
the second is converse
the third statement is the assumption for the converse
the first statement is clearly false
yh
4 does not divide 2 and 4 does not divide 2 but 4 divides 2*2=4
hmhm
2=a=b
oh
i didnt give a counterexample where i had 2 = a =b
i did a =6 and b =2
but yh all is good
the first statement is true only for prime numbers
really?
Closed by @glossy pagoda
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im guessing the answer is E since the graph of k/x has an asymptote, not sure if my thinking is correct here tho
well what if the x-1 were to somehow cancel from numerator and denominator
is that possible with some c?
if we set C equal to 3 then we'd be left with 1/x tho
and that has an asymptote at the y axis so the limit doesn't exist since the limit isn't the same from the right and left
I see, so it's just 3 then?
yes
.close
Closed by @leaden matrix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why are these wrong
Because its just slowing down until v=0 and after that its accelerating in the inverse direction
slowing down means that the absolute value of v is decreasing
so for the first image, youre saying that the particle is actually speeding up on (0,1) and (2,3)
and its slowing down on (1, 2)
.close
Closed by @graceful olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not completely sure what I did wrong here
can you show your work so we can tell what's wrong?
@zenith raft Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @zenith raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
Ello
so\
,rccw
What you wrote so far seems alright from what i can see
yes but idk where to go from here
it gives me an impossible sqrt
5 in the index, √96^2
and there's nothing you can do for multiply the index by it
liek idk what to do
i get that 96^2/5 and u have to turn it into the sqrt
so i did that but
The helper made a mistake, you did it wrong
You don't raise to the 2/5 before dividng by 3
please do tell
Because it's 3x^(5/2) = 96, you want to isolate for x
Yes
then mult by 2/5 right
Not multiply but to the 2/5 power
When you solve for x, think about reverse PEMDAS
Or BODMAS
You work backwards to isolate for x, you get rid of addition/subtraction first, then multiplication/division, then exponents, then whatever you would have in parentheses
Oof i apologise for that blunder on my part
pawn to c3
help please
i have aother one
what did you have before?
well, i knew that 25 went into 100
so i figured, why not 8 and 25
but there's no 3 pairs in either of those
bc 2√2 is 8 simplified, right
this is sensible
and the 25 simplified is simply 5
its cube root, not square root
so idk what to do
you have $(8\cdot25)^{\frac{1}{3}}=8^{\frac{1}{3}}\cdot25^{\frac{1}{3}}$
AℤØ
try simplify that
wait but why is it 1/3
cube root
i assume we are looking at the left one first?
AℤØ
ahhh
\i see what you did there
you reversed it
okay okay i see your logic
continue pls
when it asks you to simplify what is is generally asking for exactly? Exponents of prime numbers?
or just simplified surd?
just simplified essentially
okay, lets just write this as
$\sqrt[3]{8}\cdot \sqrt[3]{25}$
AℤØ
is it?
yeah, cube root of 8 is 2
OHHHHHHHHH
IM STUPID
thats right
2 times 2 times 2
2 times itself 3 times
is 8
you have $2\sqrt[3]{25}$ or maybe written as $2\sqrt[3]{5^2}$
AℤØ
thats about as simple as it can be
well, you can, just not an integer
i suppose not bc is multiple of 5 right
so it wouldn't really
wait but also
does 25 just simplify to 5
when doing what?
oh wait nah ur right
bc the 25 cant go anywhere
then there's nothing inside the uhh thingy
i suppose?
okie dokie
@iron cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
hello
idk how to start
yeah $\sqrt[4]{25}\cdot\sqrt[4]{8}$ just simplify those
AℤØ
but 25
oh wait
wait a minute
i dont get it
8 simplifies to
just write 25 and 8 as exponents of primes and simplify
dont put surds in surds
roots
25 is 5^2
the fourth root of 5^2 is the square root of 5
thats a simplification
but the root is 4 tho
i said that
$\sqrt[4]{5^2}=\sqrt{5}$
AℤØ
wait hold on
how did u get that tho
cuz simplifying 25 givew you 5
5 goes outside of the radical
but in this case its still inside the radical
what? no
wdym simplifying 25 to 5
i just square rooted, the 5 is still in the sqrt
because its a fourth root
$\sqrt[4]{5^2}=5^{\frac{2}{4}}=5^{\frac{1}{2}}=\sqrt{5}$
AℤØ
shit
i forgot that rule
the flippy reverse radical
that's what makes that possible
i need to write that down
i guess, you dont need that to see it though
its intuitive that the fourth root of 5^2 is the sqrt of 5
yea
but i always saw it as
there has to be smth multiplied by itself 4 times or such
otherwise its impossible
so 8 just simplifies to 8 1/4, right
id just leave it as $\sqrt[4]{2^3}$
AℤØ
how do i solve one with a variable in it
such as?
^4 √162x^11
just focus on the 162
theres nothing you can do to it
because its uneven right
yeah
ahhh right its coming back to me
if you suspect there's nothing you can do with it and you cant divide it into 4
then you leave it as is
so that means its
3^4√2x^11
i got a lot of studying to do
yeah
my test is tomorrow
but im not failing that
also btw
um there's this symbol
a + and -
and i think the teacher said it had to do with an even root or something
can you help explain that
pls
do you have an example?
like 2^√25
he said "the answer can be either positive or negative", so we use this symbol
you mean $\pm$
because -5 times -5 equals 25
AℤØ
the sqrt function will only return the positive value
but indeed if you were asked to solve x^2=25, then x can be either 5 or -5
so both are included in the answer
AℤØ
i wrote solving x^2=25 gives x=5 or x=-5
if i saw just x=sqrt(25), x would only be 5, at least in my eyes anyway
be mindful of that
@iron cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @iron cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo
can you get the equation of the 2nd graph?
@south rampart Has your question been resolved?
Idk how to do that
the graph on the right is a straight line
@south rampart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question 1
Exercise 5.10
Answer says y = -5x + 8
I got y = -5/x + 8
Is the textbook wrong?
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
that equation is not a line
yeah if y=ax+b // y = a'x + b' , a.a' = -1
Pls
you don't need to take reciprocal of x
u can prove this pretty easily
the slopes multiply to -1
What is m1m2
An equation of a line can be expressed as y = ax + b
I used m to represent slope
Yeah
But what is 1 and 2
$m_1m_2=-1$
WhereWolf(ping if needed)
so lets call the undefine line y1 = a'x + b'
Yeah
Just a variable
Yeah
Yeah
lets keep it there
Wait
oh wait
Where the x/5 go
sr im dumb
Yeah
Yeah
oh my bad yes
right so
Wait
wiar it’s clicking
Just the gradient becomes reciprocal
Not x aswell
X/5/-1
We can calculate a' = -5, plug that here and get the answer
@lofty walrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why limit to inf an is not diverge? Or do i forgot to add something to my answer?
is it not diverge? And is it infinitely osculate between 1 and -1 when n is even?
The limit does not exist yes
If this is your work then you likely got marked wrong for writing $-\infty / \infty$
ΣΑCu
@primal heron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's sin theta then
Can you express r from here
Can you move things around
So you get
r=...
(yes)
why would you do that
sin theta = r / r+a
cant it become r+a(sintheta)=r
(r+a)sin theta = r
rsin theta + a sin theta - r = 0
r(sin theta - 1) = -a sin theta
r= -asin theta / (sin theta - 1)
then its in terms of r
sin = r / (r+a)
(r+a) * sin = r
distributive rule
Thays why thats not the end
im still in rational function in pre calc i thought id try 😭
oh right my bad
try this
Ok now move r to the left side
uhm
a+b=c
then we cant follow with
a=b/c
that is what you did there
we have r * sin + a * sin = r
move everything with an r to one side
and the rest to the other
using the inverse functions
to move a summand to the other side, we subtract
dont dividee
good
So now factor out the r
now use the distributive rule again to factor out the r
ab+ac=a(b+c)
works in both ways
good
coorect
in case you wanna make it even smaller, you can change the fraction on the left
but definitely not needed
but i am 99.9% sure you are not supposed to do that here haha
Closed by @steep lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@fossil fossil Has your question been resolved?
@fossil fossil Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fossil fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain me what's done here:
I assume they use the double angle identities.
Well they're showing the double angle identites using complex exponentials
but why can they cancel the isin(20), thi sis the part i dont understand
They're just comparing the real and imaginary parts on both sides
sin(2 theta) = 2 sin(theta) cos(theta).
Ah I think I understand this
So, cos(2 theta) + i sin(2 theta) = cos^2(theta) - sin^2(theta) + 2i sin(theta) cos(theta)
So, that's how the finish the first equation.
I already see it, Thanks (:
Oh, OK.
they're doing it the other way around
Oh, I see.
Closed by @hasty bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Shouldn't the phi go to pi?
@unborn loom Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Which angle is phi
Azimuthal?
Actually both of them should be 0 to pi
So yes you're right
Why is $\theta$ from $0$ to $\pi$? We have $0\leq x\leq 4$ and $0\leq y \leq \sqrt{16-x^2}$.
Zander
That's the first quadrant
@unborn loom Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @unborn loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help with this question??it's trig and I cannot figure it out. ty
"hence" what's the part that comes before that?
Can you use half angle identity?
Comparing to double angle might help a bit in this case(!)
I used this for d
wait how
cuz pi/16 is not on the unit circle and idk how to solve it
Look at what you're working with here, $\frac{5 - 5\tan^2(\theta)}{\tan(\theta)}$
@tribal temple
Do you remember the tan double angle formula?
2tanx/1-tan²x
Ye, that's tan(2x) - now compare that to what you're trying to find...
is that inversed??
Yep [reciprocal], but also two other changes too... 
Yep 
Actually wait one moment
that should be 10/tan(2x)
But yep 
Closed by @weak idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
G is a commutative group. ord(<x>)=3 and ord(<y>)=5. z=xy. How do i show that 3 divides ord(<z>)?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
big hint: z^2 = xyxy = x^2y^2
(z^3)^5 = (y^3)^5 = y^15= e so it means that ord(z)=15?
yes
ok but now we immediately found ord(z)
shouldn't i say that ord(<z>) divides 15 instead because y^15=e doesn't mean that ord(<y>)=15?
is that wrong
you can also just go by the argument that
like
z=xy, and x has order 3
idk
ord(z) = lcm(ord(x),ord(y))
well it divides both 15 and 3
15/15 = 1 ✅
15/3 = 3 ✅
Hmm, not sure how to solve in general, I think you are right in saying ord(<z>) divides 15. If you would have something like z^4 = e, then x^4y^4 = e -> x=y, which is a contradiction. You can do similar things for other powers below 15, but that's probably not the quickest way
does this formula only work in commutative groups?
i think so
if a group isn't abelian then xyxy ≠ x^2 y^2, generally
so this argument isn't applicable
so is ord(<z>)=15 or we just know that its order divides 15?
yes it makes sense
if ord(<z>) divides 15, we can only say it's either 1, 3, 5 or 15
Yeah
you might have to prove that as well though
and 3 does not divide 5?
z^5 = e would imply x^5 * y^5 = e, or x^2 = e
so it would mean ord(<x>) = 2
I feel like the proof might involve bezout's lemma
there's something i don't get @fresh sparrow
yes to what?
second one ord(<z>) divides 15
No, I think we might even still have to prove that ord(z) | 15
because it hasn't really been proven
the seond quastion in the exercise was show that 15 divides ord(<z>)
z^15 = e, suppose z^k = e with gcd(k, 15) = 1, then by bezout z^1 = e, so that's some progress
Oh, wait
suppose z^k = e, with gcd(k, 3) = 1. then z^1 = e
so 3 | k
nvm, that just works for x
does gcd(k, 3)=1 mean that 3 divides k?
i don't get why the order of z isn't 15
it is, but we have to prove it
z^15 = x^15y^15 = e*e
yeah, but how does that proof extend to other integers than 3?
yeah so that would'nt work for 5 either so it's 15
does it have to
z^k = e only when x^k = e and y^k = e, which happens for the first time for k=lcm(ord(x), ord(y))
why does it ask me to show that 3 divides ord(z) and then that 15 divides ord(z) if we can immediately know that it's 15
i feel like i am missing something very simple but i genuinely don't see what's wrong with my approach
why does z^k = e only happen when x^k = e and y^k = e?
x^k = e and y^k = e imply z^k = e, but does it go the other way around too
so a possible counterexample is when y=x^-1 right
y^l = x^-1 for example
but it must be 15 in our case because it's already a product of 2 primes
y = x^-1 won't work because y^3 = (x^3)^-1 = e
You can probably go down the list of 1 ... 14 and show each one individually with a bit of algebra, but that's not the intended solution I think
so essentially your argument boils down to the fact that for some m and n, both respectively less than ord(x) and ord(y), x^m y^n may be e?
I think so, m = n in this case
i see

Hmm, weird argument but: suppose z^k = e, with gcd(k, 15) = 1, then 3 and 5 don't divide k. And z^k = x^k * y^k = e, then raise both sides to the 5th power, so x^5k = e
that gives a contradiction though, since 5k can be reduced to something less then 3 by subtracting 3 multiple times
Oh suppose z^k = e and 3 doesn't divide k, then x^k * y^k = e, x^5k * y^5k = x^5k = e
same contradiction
yeah
I'll go step by step
suppose z^k = e and 3 doesn't divide k, then x^k * y^k = e
right?
yes
And x^(5k) * y^(5k) = e as well
yes
i don't understand this
x^(5k) / x^3 = e / e = e
i prefer not to use division when we alrady use the multiplicative notation
so it's x^(5k)*x^(-3)?
x^(5k) * (x^3)^-1 = e * e^-1 = e * e = e
yeah
ok
so x^(5k - 3a) = e, right? (a is an integer)
yes
but 3 doesn't divide 5k - 3a, suppose it would: then 3 | 5k -> 3 | k, but we assumed 3 didn't divide k
3 doesnt divide 5k - 3a because 3 doesn't divide k?
yes i see
so for some a, 5k - 3a = 1 or 5k - 3a = 2
and x^1 = e, or x^2 = e, which are contradictions
so i do the exact smae thing with 15 in the second question?
for (1) you start with z^k = e and "3" doesn't divide k
for (2) you start with z^k = e and 5 doesn't divide k
ok
so you can conclude that 3 | k and 5 | k which would mean 15 | k
ok thanks and in the last question it says: show that G has a subgroup of order 15. So we now 15 divides ord(z) but is lagrange theorem enough to say that a subgroup of order 15 exists?
by the way, do the 2 questions imply that ord(z)=15? if yes, why?
(1) implies 3 | ord(z), and by replacing all the 3's in the proof with 5's you can get 5 | ord(z)
so yes
Maybe you can use the subgroup generated by z
since we know that z^15 = e
the subgroup will have order 15
Closed by @oblique torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
i also asked to someone yesterday and they disnt give me the answer but they told me to use $<x> \cap <y>$. Do you know how it could've worked out if we used it?
lilisworld
i mean the first question, not the last one
@worn halo
@fresh sparrow
<@&286206848099549185>
No, not sure
Closed by @oblique torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any idea of how to solve this ?
Find 4 paths first :
- One that goes from 0 to 1,
- One that goes from 1 to 1+i,
- One that goes from 1+i to i,
- One that goes from i to 0.
so is it always z = x+iy correct?
so should I integrate from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0?
Have you found the paths yet?
those 4 paths
you can name them f1,...,f4 or anything else you'd like
yes sure, but are you not asked in question a) to explicit the path as a single one?
I thought it meant to be like find the four sides of the square aka the 4 traces
because what I have done in the previous exercise was something similar but English wise better explanted
@nocturne oasis Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @nocturne oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I start this
sin+cos=1?
sorry typo
than u multiply by 2 and move it on the other side
u will have a quadratic equation, just solve it
?
correct
yeah so u get sin^2 x +sinx -1 =0
can i do this for the quadratic formula
why 2u
2 sin?
yeah 2u^2
does sinx = 1/2 and -1?
is this right
actuallu
i did that wrong
u cant sqrt a negative number
wait
nvm
-1-3 -4/4 = -1
im looking at my professors notes and she got postive 1
so idk what i did
oops
wait
i wrote it here
isnt b 1
1^2
is 1
oh
the +
ik thats wrong
when i rewrote it
i subtracted
+1 FOR WHAT
for the other sin value
IF WE CHANGE COS^2(X) INTO SIN^2(X)
1 + SINX = 2( 1 - (SINX)^2 )
AND IF WE SUBSTITUTE SINX = 1 INTO THAT WE GET 2=0
WHICH IS WRONG
MAYBE UR TEACHER MADE MISTAKE
IT IS CORRECT
I WAS JUST CHECKING YOUR TEACHER'S ANSWER
YOUR TEACHER SAID SINX = 1
I SUBSTITUTED THAT INTO THE ORIGINAL EQUATION
AND GOT 2=0 , WHICH MAKES NO SENSE, MEANING SINX = 1 IS WRONG
@bitter tartan Has your question been resolved?
Ohh i see yeah i was wondering how she got 1
lemme send u her notes
wait
Was it cuz she factored and i did the quadratic formula ?
does that change anything
<@&286206848099549185>
SHE FACTORED WRONG ON THE LEFT SIDE, SHE FACTORED CORRECT ON THE RIGHT SIDE
CORRECTION:
Damn she fr uploaded the notes like that😭 it was making me confused ty tho
ALSO, FACTORING AND USING QUADRATIC FORMULA ALWAYS RETURNS THE SAM ANSWERS
Closed by @bitter tartan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't really know where to start
i mean i know an upper bound can be established by doing x^3/6, right?
@red marsh Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@red marsh Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
i found p4
just fjnd the largest (absolute) value for |x|<0.1
like the 4th derivative evaluated at x = 0 is 24. Thus the 4th term of the polynomial is x^4, right?
wait why isn't it important? I thought the error must be less than the next term?
idk idc
so the error is the same as the original function?
no…
the error is defined as the difference between the polynomial and the original function
oh i see. So im just seeingwhat value of 0 < x < .1 in which the value of p(x) - 1/1-x is the greatest?
but isn't the error going to be greatest at x= 0.1 since that's the furthest from the center?
i don't really understand this. in this problem, e^x - (1 + x + x^2/2) for x = 1/3 is 0.0067 and x=-1/3 is -0.0057. But why is the answer in the problem 0.0123?
<@&286206848099549185>
@red marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
can you send a better quality pic
nvm
not that
Ethan has a points card for a movie theater. He receives 55 rewards points just for signing up. He earns 12.5 points for each visit to the movie theater. He needs at least 150 points for a free movie ticket. Write and solve an inequality which can be used to determine x,the number of visits Ethan can make to eran his first free movie ticket
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
okay
let x be number of visits
yea
we have 55 points initially
uhuh
we get 12.5 per visit
correct
so it's 12.5*x per x many visits
for the inequality
$55+12.5x \leq 150$
artemetra
there's your inequality
ok
now, how would you go about solving it
yes
not ≤
^
ok is it the other one?
so =
not ≤, not ≥
it wont
let me put that
then ≥
ok
also it's ≥150
i made a typo, sorry
np
you too
Closed by @pseudo vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to calculate P(X>2) when my cumulative distribution function is
Well what information does a cumulative distribution function give us?
the probability accumulated to that point ?
@naive lily Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i understand the idea of the taylor series but i just keep getting it wrong, and i dont understand what the problem is asking
sorry I should probably use this one as there is better work for it
@kind finch Has your question been resolved?
You entered 5 terms
Idk if that’s the only error
@kind finch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please could I have some help with this differential equation
I tried dividing through by 2ylnx to try and use the integrating factor approach but I have a function of y and x on the RHS, so that doesn't work. I don't think separation of variables will work either as I've tried that
I just did scribbles it isn't very readable
I'm confused because all I've been taught is integrating factor and separation of variables so it would have to be one of those methods I would assume
Integrating factor should work
notice that d/dy(y(x)^2) is 2ydy/dx and d/dx(ln(x)) is 1/x, you can simplify the LHS with this
The question then is how I can get rid of the 'y's so they don't end up on the RHS at all
But since there are two of increasing power I'm not sure how, I've tried factorising it but it leads nowhere seemingly
Notice that the LHS is a disguised application of the product rule where y is a function of x
@atomic magnet that's a good point
if you notice this you wont have to deal with the algebraic pain of integrating factor
Let me try that
good luck!
I'm struggling to do it, do you know a method to "reverse the product rule" I suppose in this instance?
in a formal sense, that is what integrating factor does - consider what happens if you take the derivative of y^2ln(x) with respect to x, where y is a function of x
You would get 2yln(x) dy/dx + y^2/x
Ohhhhhh
Hahaaa
I forgot I could differentiate a function of y with respect to x
yes!
haha thats okay uve got it in the end which is important
well its somewhat just understanding the equation as a whole, i noticed how the y terms (2y and y^2) were related and the x terms (ln(x) and 1/x) were related too
and then one realises that its just the product rule
Ohhh I managed to do it
what were your steps
yep cool
Is that something I can do everytime
Wait a minute I have a two in there I'm not supposed to have
Maybe my method doesn't work
oh yeah so sorry didnt notice that, it should be d/dx(y^2ln(x)) = e^(-2x)
No no worries at all it's my mistake
the u = y^2, du = 2y, v = ln(x), dv = 1/x
So would you just take two very obvious differentials and say they are the the u and du/dx, so for instance the ln(x) and 1/x in this case
And then you know what the remaining terms have to be

