#help-49
1 messages ¡ Page 3 of 1
Closed by @haughty pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why do they set the x and y equation to y
could you just as well choose to set-up with x
you said it yourself, they could just as well do it with the other variable
its whatever they chose to do
Closed by @acoustic junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can i have some help with this question pls
@spring meadow Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
First it travels $d$ to go to the floor then $2\left( \frac{41}{50} \right) d$ when it first bounces and goes back to the floor then $2\left( \frac{41}{50} \right)^{2} d$ etc
black_couscous
When you write it down you get a geometric series
ik its a geometric but idk what to do with that after
You've got $d + 2d\sum_{n \ge 1}\left( \frac{41}{50}\right)^{n}$
black_couscous
sorry i dont mean to ask alot of questions but how have u gotten that
actually dont worry
i understand
Don't worry you're here to understand. I just continued this
Then this is equal to $d + \frac{82d}{50}\cdot \frac{50}{9}$
black_couscous
how do you find this out?
I used the geometric series
i havnt done geometric series using sigma notation
would u mind explaining how to work it out quick please
$1+ r + r^2 +... = \frac{1}{1-r}$ if $-1<r<1$
black_couscous
oh yh
@spring meadow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @spring meadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yo a brother need help
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
in what way do you wish for this help
Closed by @terse spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok so
i assume the first thing i do is 2(sqrt x + 11 - 2) on the top
i know usually for a square root you would multiply it by its opposite self but i havent seen something in the practice questions of a 2 variable sqrt before so im not sure how to go abouts doing this
In this section we will discuss the properties of limits that weâll need to use in computing limits (as opposed to estimating them as we've done to this point). We will also compute a couple of basic limits in this section.
2x + 22 - 16 / x + 3 ( sqrt 2x + 22 - 4)
not sure what u mean
is the issue is ur unsure about how to rationalize the numerator ?
Closed by @plucky canopy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How much should you deposit in a bank paying 2% compounded quarterly to accumulate an amount of P80,000 in 5 years and 9 months?
isnt there like a finance thing on ur calculator to this?
been a while but there's like PV PMT FV thing?
Yeah there is.
$A = P(1 + \frac{r}{n})^{nt}$
Bestower
@dawn crescent
In this case it would be easier to have that $A = P(1+r)^t$ given that t = quarterly periods
clip
@dawn crescent Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dawn crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is number 11 â30/âź??
@topaz willow Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@topaz willow Has your question been resolved?
@topaz willow sqrt(30/pi), yeah
Closed by @topaz willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
they are not
Closed by @viscid bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
computing residue of $f(z) = \Gamma [z] \Gamma [l-z], l \in \mathbb{N}$
so i got residue at $a \in \mathbb{Z}, a \le 0$ as
wtf square brackets
$\frac{\Gamma(l-a)}{\prod_{k=a}^{-1}k}$
\prod not \Prod
can i simplify this? or its decent
i'd rewrite the product in denom as (-1)^a * |a|! ...
match the gamma function in the numerator with a factorial
$\frac{\Gamma(l-a)}{(-1)^a |a|!}$
hm?
so what do i do :c
do u think i just calculated it wrong n i shld show how i got it
lol
you want to like
shift the gamma functions out of the region you're trying to calculate the residue
so that it's holomorphic where you're taking the residue
and then in the process of shifting you should get a bunch of factors in the denominator
oh ok
$(z-a) \Gamma(z-a+1) \Gamma(l-z) / [z(z+1)(z+1)...(z-a)]$
rewrite the numerator as
a factorial?
and cancel maybe
but then
it doesn't necessarily make it better
you can probably just leave it
oh yea
i can rewrite it as a factorial
ok so i guess the final form is still ugly either way?
cuz you get part of a factorial popping up
is this any better
also is prod vs factorial any better
or either is fine
in terms of simplified anw
ans
factorial is smaller in the denom of a fraction
wdym
that's probably one benefit lol
like
if you write the product symbol
it's massive in the denom of a fraction
so either you do a ^-1 exponent
but isit considered simplified or nay
or you write it as a factorial
well
depends
if you can write it as factorial it's probably better
this mayb
that's a factorial
yeah
this
(l-a)Pa
y r u talkin abt permutation rn
im so confused
ok well
my main dish has been served
so
.close
Closed by @flat halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
send your question
Ok
Hmmmm
That's it?
I believe so
After 15m I should ping helpers?
idk but that's what it says
Ok.
Yo
This one
So close?
-4/3
Ok
Anything else?
Hmmm wait.
Here
Need a walk through?
Aight
It's not easy for me yet.
So I think âwhat factors of -27 add up to +6â
Which number?
âThereâs -1 27 to get 26, -3 9 to get +6, oh wait thatâs the answerâ
...
And then I rewrite it as (x-3)(x+9)
A little
Ok
Yes I think
(x-3)(x+9) = 0
Expression is zero if either factor is zero, so x-3 =0 and x+9=0
And solve for x
Now u all good?
Anymore problems thatâs bothering u? Lemme atâm
will this channel get removed?
ok
If it times out yes
If u do .close the channel is also removed
It times out after 15 minutes of no activity I think
But I gtg. Later bro
@keen turret Has your question been resolved?
@keen turret Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @keen turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is a question from an exam I had a few days ago
I was not able to solve it, what kind of series test should have I done?
Integral or?
I need to find out if the series converges or diverges
@earnest prawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Want a refresher on how c would work again
i suppose it is when they are identical, but how would i relate that to here
You do want both lines to overlap (lines in the x1 x2 plane ofc). Therefore you want the same slope and a shared point
hm so
ah i guess this means
h is 2
okay thats that
k is 9?
Yes
Another way to see it is indeed to make the equations the same, i.e. show they're equivalent
oh interesting, it also has NO solutions for any number that is h = 2 and not equal to k = 9
Because parallel lines
ah i see
All concepts that are further developed in linear algebra btw
same slope, different intercepts would indicate they are in fact parallel, same for both would be just both being overlapping thus having infinitely many solutions
fair enough
which is the course i am taking right now đ
very fun, just building up my basis again
If you want I can somewhat expand on this
Though preferably knowing kernels already would be a +
ah yes, i would like to prove it mathematically
Linear algebra is this field of studying complicated properties of simple things
Linear applications are indeed very simple
You only need to know how they act on a basis to know how they act on any vector
Did you see kernels yet ? I'd assume you haven't
Ok actually, due to being in an affine vector space, almost all of linear algebra doesn't directly apply lol
But the concepts still carry over
oh funnily enough
apparently it is one of the few fields of maths where you could say that is 'fully understood' from what i read
kind of shocked me to a degree, but it is interesting
Nope, i can show you our syllabus
It's much easier to study in finite dimension, but the existence of a basis for any infinite dimensional vector space makes it manageable
this can be counted as an introductory course, so yes
just exited the lecture an hour ago, just talking about null spaces for now
so thats as far as my knowledge goes
I see
To try and apply linalg to this problem, I think it's fair to ask "could there be finitely many (but > 1) solutions" ?
that sounds like a contradicting statement for the layman i won't lie
how can something that could be anything be represented finitely?
Why can't there be exactly 3 solutions to this equation?
Is what I meant
You mean for our original question problem?
Yes
hmm
3 solutions would suggest that they would intersect at three different points
that's not really..possible for simple lines, i am guessing?
Yes
interesting analogy, i like it
It's not an analogy
yeah it is the stuff itself, more like it
These equations define lines in the x1 x2 plane
To be able to apply linalg to this, I'm just going to shift the coordinate space around, say shifting the origin 3 units to right. That way we have x + hy = 0
Where x and y are our knew coordinates
Also, I find it interesting how you can construct problems for things above 3 dimensions even if you can't really...represent those dimensions, right?
makes sense
You learn to either take your examples in 2 or 3D, or you just do away with such visualizations. With enough habit you just don't need them to understand the nature of stuff
Which is fortunate, because having an exam that is equivalent to the study of a 9D cone would be rough if we could only rely on visualizing it that way
yeah exactly
what would 9 dimensions even be..
it is so astonishing how you can represent things in maths that the human brain definitely cannot feel or see
Then the 2nd equation becomes 3x + 6y = k'. Since it's an equation, we divide it by 3 to get x + 2y = c (and we need to find c)
It's 3^2. That's how the 9 came up. A linear application over R^3 is represented by a point in 9D space
In the exam I'm thinking of, we were considering some of these applications, and it ends up being a cone in the 9D space in which you can represent them
We want to find x and y that verify both equations. Clearly c = 0 is the only solution (working backwards you'd get k=9 back)
But then, every point on one line is on the other, because they're described by the same equation
So there has to be infinitely many solutions
In linear algebra, that generalizes to the intersection of null spaces
If instead I had f(x) = g(x) = 0, where f, g are linear in some n dimensional vector space
Which you can just think of as R^n basically without loss of generality
Then the vectors x that are solutions both to f(x) = 0 and g(x) = 0 are therefore in Ker f and in Ker g (by definition of the null space
That means x is solution iff x is in Ker f intersected with Ker g.
But an intersection (even infinite) of vector spaces is a vector space
Therefore the set of solutions is a vector space: a point, a line, a plane, etc...
Therefore as soon as there's a nonzero solution, because the equation is linear, all of its multiples are and there's infinitely many solutions
Sorry, currently unable to read, but i will make sure to read this in my free time if you don't mind
For example, a plane is described by an equation, like x + 2y - 3z = 0. This is actually a consequence of the fact hyperplanes (in finite dimension, these are n-1 dimensional subspaces of an n dimensional space) are null spaces for a linear form (that is also unique up to a multiplicative constant) (a linear form maps a vector to a scalar). In this example, the linear function is f(x,y,z) = x + 2y - 3z
That's hinted at by the fact that all kernels are subspaces
Now of course, all of this is total overkill for your exercise, where it is sufficient to divide the 2nd equation by 3 and notice x can only be a solution to both if the constants are equal (exercise: why is that?)
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Pls halp ;;;
Whatâs the whole question?
i think that is the whole question
it's implied that what follows is a blank to be filled in
anyway drawing a position-time graph might help
Thereâs something written in the next line
Wait
Hey guys, has anyone seen that problem on Irodov's physics problems... in fact the first problem, its kinda the same....
irodov 
i see 
that a jee popular book 
Holy jesus jee PPL here?
@thick parcel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Write the following as an inequality.
x is less than or equal to 5 and greater than
Use x only once in your inequality,.
8
Anser
try using these to solve the question
@obsidian sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Give answer plsđď¸đď¸đď¸
Do not insist the helpers on simply giving out the answer.
@obsidian sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
shouldnt this be -2/3 since modulus of -i gives you i and when you square it you get i^2 which is -1?
|-i| = |i| = 1
Modulus of i isn't the same as i^2
|i^2| isn't the same as i^2
Nonetheless it's 1
I think because |z|=sqrt[a^2+b^2] for z=a+bi
Yes
@shut bronze Has your question been resolved?
oh, yh got it, modulus of a complex number is sqrt(real_part^2 + imaginary_part^2)
thanks
Closed by @shut bronze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well if the number you're multiplying by doesn't have the base as a factor you can't simplify it anymore
or if the base isn't simplified fully
like a square number
for exmaple
Closed by @stoic hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
HEELP
PLSSSSSS
if i have a ramp and i have a car, how can i make the ramp so the car has a high speed but low acceleration
also how do i make it so there is low speed but high acceleration
What feature of a ramp would cause a car to accelerate really fast?
@opaque drum Has your question been resolved?
Idk
I was thinking of maybe sharp turns
Cuz even if speed stayed constant it accelerates?
@keen herald
I don't think you'd need to go as far as to have the ramp change instantaneously
I imagine a very steep ramp would have higher acceleration than a very shallow ramp
@opaque drum Has your question been resolved?
this feels like it's both high speed and low acceleration
or maybe it would be considered low speed, because it loses speed with time too
if we keep it as simple as we can, the speed is proportional to height, the acceleration is the slope, the shape is just a line
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where does the p come from?
They multiplied and divided with p!
(p+1)(p+2)...(p+n) multiplies all integers from p+1 to p+n
but (n+p)! multiplies all integers from 1 to n+p
so to remove all number from (n+p)! to get to (p+1)...(p+n), you have to divide by all 1*2*3*...*p, which is p!
Closed by @normal citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I havent come across a problem like this before
I know sin(A+B) = Sin(a)+Cos(b)
but we have 2 cos so we cant really use that
<@&286206848099549185>
i found a formula for this it might help
cos(x)cos(y) = 1/2(cos(x-y)+cos(x+y))
i think you carry the 6 for the ride
@broken wren Has your question been resolved?
so we would get like 3(cos(27s-2s)+cos(27s+2s))
yeah i think so
well that was wrong
@broken wren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in b why is f' 0.4? shouldn't it be negative
realisticaly yes
or in my mmind at least
but there are weird cases where increasing the price of a product makes you sell more
@torn marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @torn marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@solar dragon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @solar dragon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello I'm having a problem with an image
Find the area of the (square?) - find the area of the circle = answer
I know both already
Why do you minus?
To get the blue area
Never mind @crude dune can take over
Ok thanks
You got it?
Yh I just wanted to why minus
Cause most classmates was telling me to add
But thanks
Np
Any suggestions what to say?
Oh
Yeah
Is the sqaure or circle shaded reigon
First
Im assuming sqaure is shaded
Cause if circle is shaded you just do pi r sqaured and ignore sqaure
It is
<@&268886789983436800>
bruh
Just say the shaded region is definietely the sqaure because it wouldnt make sense if it wasnt
Thanks lad
And if you were looking for whole area it is just the square ignore the circle
Cause I asked like 4 helpers the same question and they're doing minus so I don't know who is wrong...
.close
Closed by @void widget
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so for b)
it would just be t distributed with n-1 degrees of freedom right
i feel like thats too easy though
or am i paranoid
@steel night Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @steel night
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I go about solving this?
by hand?
i need a step by step on how to answer
oh yeah sure
Kinda confused on how to go about this
$\frac{1}{1.67 * 10^{-24}} = \frac{1}{1.67} \frac{1}{10^-24} = \frac{1}{1.67} \frac{10^0}{10^{-24}} = \frac{1}{1.67} 10^{0--24}$
what the hell
are you using LaTex?
trying to haha
Gijs
$= \frac{1}{1.67} * 10^{24}$
Gijs
so 10^24/1.67?
yes
how would that look without scientific notation
,calc 10^24/1.67
Result:
5.9880239520958e+23
this isnt eactly scientific notation though
i think my math teacher will accept it
oh for sure
.close
Closed by @real ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what seems to be the problem here?
My answer aren't in the choices
@pearl fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
An isosceles triangle has hypotenuse of 15, determine the length of other 2 equal sides
I want to know is hypotenuse only exists in right triangles?
Or in isosceles triangles itâs just the different leangth side
I donât want exact answer I want some hint
@dark fulcrum Has your question been resolved?
@dark fulcrum Has your question been resolved?
yeah, hypotenuse only exists in a right triangle
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Finally
.close
Closed by @bleak hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I have a/b = 2^m where m is an integer
Then do I know for sure that a and b are themselves integer powers of two?
they can be or they may not be
but there are many ways that we can assemble them to be
Ahh, darn. I thought I was on the right track
I'm trying to show that if a/b = 2^m, then b/a = 2^n is also true (m and n are integers)
Would you care to share so that the slower students in the class can follow along? XD
b/a = (a/b)^-1
yeah
@fresh crow Has your question been resolved?
Rockin!
Closed by @fresh crow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for the forward direction, i'm not sure what linear transformation to choose
i wanted to go with A(h)=0
but i dont think i can pull out absolute values like that
A is a linear transformation. that means A(x) = mx + b for some constants m and b
Right
I understand that
but how would you pick a smart A(h) such that the limit is 0?
any hints?
write f as its taylor series
kawaii_pear
only up to quadratic terms are needed
kawaii_pear
i may have messed up something its been a while
yea that's wrong. look it up in a book or wiki
this is correct
wait
i think i found another way of doing this
A(h)=f'(a)*h
since we can manipulate the definition of f'(a)
that's equivalent if you taylor expand f about a+h
Ohh i see
okay
what about for the other direction then?
nvm
i got it
thank you
.close
Closed by @toxic scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I'm doing ParabolaVertices-VertexFormula
I would like to know if it's correct so far and the steps to solve it
My problem is when substituting the X as a fraction and solving it
@mint carbon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mint carbon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
or can you only use the squeeze theorem to prove a sequence converges
@steady sandal Has your question been resolved?
@steady sandal Has your question been resolved?
Hi
@steady sandal Has your question been resolved?
it oscilates, it doesnt diverge
diverge was the correct answer though
if a sequence oscillates doesnât that mean it diverges
i mean itâs oscillating between -1 and 1 i think as n approaches infinity
so it definitely diverges
no, -1^n doesnt diverge. mb, the numerator oscilates between negative and positive infinity
so ig u say thats diverging
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if we want to get the sin expression
do we multiply by x and devise by 2
or like the 2nd expression (as the teacher did )
multiplied by 2 and devided by x
im confused
Yes
minus the fraction not only the exponential
yes we put it outside
to have 2i in the denominator
we have to multiply by x/2 right ?
Ok first of all do you mean to say e^(ix) + e^(-ix) in the second line?
what
Is this a fourier transform btw
you don't need this
here
would the sign be there if it was x/2
We wanted to get the sin expression
thats why we need to multiply by x/2
but its 2/x
do you do physics?
yes
second line is zero
omg ignore the sign
hmm
correct
i don't think so
when we want to get the sin expression
we multiply by x/2
and then 2/x
thats why at the end we got
consider using equals signs
alright
i give up on this
i'll come back for another integral
stuck on some basic maths
thanks
.close
Closed by @hollow geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let ABC be a right-angled triangle with \angle A=90. If AB=500 cm and \angle C=30, BC=?
I didn't learn it
I have.
can you show your diagram
$sin(30)=\frac{1}{2}=\frac{500}{BC}$
Its just right angle trig
Tech support
@vital nacelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone help me? My answer is indeterminate 𼺠should i consider the fact that my function has asymptotes? I dont know how to approach this problem đĽšđĽš
U sub is the way to go
This is rhe same question isnt it
They asked to integrate it to pi, function isnt even defined at pi
Ah
mhm it isn't even improper integral
but
Technically you can still get a complex answer but I donât think thatâs what youâre looking for here
it's possible to solve it over complex
Is splitting integral not possible? Like from 0 to 1 then from 1 to pi?
Im pretty sure the answer there can be found using complex process but i dont know how to
this is even correct result (according to WolframAlpha)
Coz they wont be giving that if itâs not answerable
Just plug in pi and 0
Yup but the answer is indeterminate
Thatâs my problem
They want definite answer đđ
The answer isnt valid at least in real number cuz the argument for sin inv is greater than 1
It is possible over complex
it's complex number then
How can i solve it? Like the process. Coz i really dont have idea
Use the complex definition of sin
@carmine narwhal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
Just post the question
Dude you're breaking rules
Chill
Is there a typo
Is it supposed to say "BD bisects ABE"?
Well with the information given, it's not possible
i think it is
just assume it is please
Well then it should say BD bisects ABE
he makes typos a lot
3 and 4?
What else
You don't have to ping me every goddamn secon
But yes
But now let's look at the first question
sorry Iâve been stuck on this for 45 minutes
yea
So set up that equation
ok
They give you equations for m3 and m4
9x+10?
What, no
Just set up an equation
m3 = m4
Legit substitute with the information they gave you
ok
4x + 10 + 5x = ??????
4x + 10 = 5x*
@last slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I have a question
How to prove that the vector 0 such that for every vector x, x+0=x , is a unique vector
??
assume there is another zero vector 0', then using this axiom and commutativity of addition, can you show that 0=0'?
Give me a sec to do this
I am stuck
I think that I am stuck because I am stupid
So for now I assumed that there exists 0' different than 0 such that x+0'=x
start like this
0 = 0+0' = ...
Ok so if I replace 0' by x+y where x and y are additive inverses
no no, no need to introduce any x or y
Then 0=0+(x+y)=(0+x)+y=x+y=0'
I think I have a mistake here
Since I can't say x+0=x
just look at 0+0', whys it 0'?
i mean, why is 0+0'=0'?
Bc 0 is the vector such that 0+x=x and in our case x=0'
so,
0=0+0'=0' right?
Ok I have a question is 0 here already defined to be the vector such that x+0=0
Bc if that's the case then we can do this
yes, we assume
x+0=x and
x+0'=x
But in this case 0'=0
just as a tiny detail, i would add
0=0+0'=0'+0=0'
Oh ok
But I have a question
Can't we work it as follows
x=x+0'=x+0
By assumption
So x+0'=x+0 then 0=0'
yes that should work ..
but you gotta show why 0=0' follows from this
just substitute x=0 i guess
subtracting x from both sides would work yes, but doing it axiom by axiom is a bit of work, depends how detailed you want it
Or in other words add the additive inverse of x to both sides call it y
Actually I am studying linear algebra and this is the 2nd section of the first chapter so I probably do it using the axiom
if you just put x=0 it will work out much easier
But if I plug x=0 isnt that just working in a particular case
Oh wait nvm
To obtain 0=0+0' where 0' is the vector such that x+0'=x I plug x=0 to get the first equation
we have
x+0'=x+0 for all x, so in particular it works for x=0 too, and everything that follows from there is true too
the result 0=0' doesnt depend on any x
Oh okk
Tysm for your time and sorry if I annoyed you
Have a very nice day
.close
Closed by @heavy falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np, thx
â
I have another question
If I want to show that y such that x+y=0 is unique then I do a similar procedure ?
yeah assume x+y=0 and x+y'=0 and show y=y'
hmm i think that wouldnt work in this case because y depends on x, like you would get
x+y=0
=> 0+y=0
Oh ok
but instead of plugging x=0 theres another thing you can do to get rid of the x
Add y on both sides
Is that right
If I do this then I get x+y+y=x+y'+y then 0+y=0+y' which means that y=y'
yeah, like
x+y=x+y'
y+x=y'+x
(y+x)+y=(y'+x)+y
y+(x+y)=y'+(x+y)
...
thats lots of work again unfortunately
theres also the "smart" way
y=y+0=y+(x+y')=...
can you see how to continue?
But right after the last step you wrote comes y+0=y'+0 and y+0=y which is the same for y'+0=y' then y=y'
Yea =(y+x)+y'=y'
yeah, for these kinds of problems theres always the short path, but sometimes its hard to think of it
It's nice to think of the short path
You helped me a lot tysm
Self studying is nice but needs effort
These are simple but I am stupid atm
that will come over time, once you have much more complicated concepts this will be easy
Self studying isnt hard it's just harder than studying in the class
That's why it needs more work and effort than studying in class
These concepts should already be too easy but idk why I was stuck at them
Maybe because I didn't even think about them before since I saw them as pretty much obvious ideas which don't need to be proved
but now you learned them
Yea thanks to you
I am grateful for you
You gave me from your time
I gtg sleep gnnnn and have a very nice dayyyy/nightttt bc idk whats the time in your country rn XD
Cya
bye
.close
Closed by @heavy falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Number 9 down
Am I able to add the x to the power down and remove the lnx2 with lnx4 to have 1/lnx2
@umbral cradle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @umbral cradle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
that is the only issue I am having with this problem why is it not -(x+s)^3+x- (x^3+x)/S
.close
Closed by @carmine ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What does it mean for something to be an orderd field
@uneven sandal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @cosmic storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is the bigger power negligible ?
if there is a more simple explanation i would appreciate that
What's the confusion exactly
When x gets small larger exponents go to 0 faster
I can't really explain it simpler than that without knowing what exactly you're stuck on
if its x^6 and x^5 if x=1 they both will be 1, so wont they reach 0 in the same speed ?
but in a graph representation, how will they go to zero faster if they are both x^m and x^n
thats the defn of it anw
so basically they will hit 0 at the same time, but limit here is for the area before literal 0 right ?
in which case u get some this with a>0
Yeah what matters is the behavior close to but not at 0
duh, exactly = 0 when x=0
but this
hit 0 doesnt matter
like it can literally never hit 0
thats not what we are concerned about here
we are concerned about this ?
yes
Well the goal is to help us evaluate limits
so we just some deleted neighbourhood of the point we are evaluating
so the larger the exponent, the faster it will go to 0 when x is decreasing to 0
which makes the bigger exponent negligible
Yeah basically
um vanish faster
but when x tends to infinity, the smallwr is negligible if the limit is 0 because it grows slower ?
