#graduate-applications
1 messages · Page 18 of 1
is that not just a phd program
if you’re guaranteed to get into the phd after the masters
Basically yeah. I think it's only structured like that for funding reasons
Does anyone know whether or not research classes and research are measured equally when it comes to research experience?
what is a research class
Like basically what I mean is a class where you participate in a project that is supposed to be akin to research
Versus research in an actual research group
that just sounds like research
I mean I guess? Im just kind of worried about whether or not grad committees with judge harshly where my research is coming from
Im at an R1 but it’s been hard to get into a group where a prof had time for undergrads
you aren't supposed to join a group unless you're a really strong undergrad
more often its just individual with profs
Really?
Ehhhh depends on the field
research labs / groups are uncommon in math
whereas in engineering and the sciences, formal groups and labs are quite ubiquitous
Even if there is a research group it might be very loosely defined like. Eg in my case there is an “optional” (the advisor wants everyone to go but won’t care too much if people miss) once a week meeting where we have lunch and talk about what we’ve all been working on. But collaborations are negotiated individually and not everyone is working with another person in the group
(And frankly I cannot imagine an undergrad being a part of this working group)
This is very unlike other STEM subjects
in my undergrad, one of my mentors ran a good working group for his research area (algebraic combinatorics)
and there was an associated seminar for the group (open to anyone) and frequently afterwards there would be group discussion on math and other stuff
as an undergrad it was really nice to be able to sit in and I learned alot of math by listening and asking questions (he encouraged undergrads to come and try to learn stuff)
but I have never heard of any other similar thing
which is a shame but also it seems hard to pull off
Im math phys
but Im wanting to go into theory and math phys
that sounds cool
Depends on the institution
I'M STRESSED
Do you know of any software for Windows that solves mathematical problems? If so, what are they?
Probably not. Also, i wouldnt focus on graduating early. Focus on doing a good phd.
not really the right channel for this, try #computing-software and be more specific
Not sure why it would make doing a phd harder.
I will say I know people here at the phd program I am in who did a masters before coming and and who did not do a masters before coming here
and it seems like in either case they will take 5-6 years to do the PhD
Same here
Of course depends if you are in US or Europe or elsewhere
This is the standard thing to do in the UK so I wouldn’t see why it would make it harder or easier. Everywhere has a slightly different system but I don’t see why it would make a huge difference anywhere
Are there fields/sub fields in pure math that have disproportionately more/less PhD applicants compared to open positions. I am trying to get a rough idea about fields that are relatively more/less competitive to get into grad schools. And I am not really concerned about post docs.
I know a few people who speedran quals cuz they already knew things, either from being a very strong undergrad or doing a masters. But if your goal is academia there isn't really a benefit to graduating earlier
I don't get the point of this question
do you not care what field you study?
To a good extent, yes. I want to specialize in algebra I think. I have taken some courses in combi and algebra, and I like most of them. I am basically at a point where I am to specialize in a certain subfield (maybe polynomial methods in combinatotics, representation theory, but idk) . I would want to avoid fields that are extremely competitive.
And I do not, atleast atm, want to go into academia. I am going to do the PhD almost entirely because I like studying maths. But if I can get into a more "prestigious" or whatever uni, I'll be probably more employable.
i don't see how you can optimize your proposed field of study for grad program prestige while applying
that would have to be done early on in university, when choosing courses to take/professors to talk to/summer programs to do/...
(and isn't really worth doing imo)
i think the competitiveness of admissions for a given field at a given university is very hard to gauge, and anyway the optimal way to pitch your application to a given school is purely a function of their faculty's research interests & willingness to advise you
also imho from the standpoint of enjoying your phd, working in competitive areas can be a lot of fun even if you dont want to continue in academia
bc there will be a lot of exciting activity, conferences, other students to talk to, etc., not to mention that many people will be interested in your work
I should have clarified this, but I am probably going to do a master's first(starting next year). So, I still have a couple of more years before I start applying for PhD programmes. I just felt this is the most relevant thread to ask that question.
I see. Thanks for the response.
tbf it probably depends which countries youre applying in
what i said might only be true in the US
got it
What should an academic cv look like?
Like what should it include/leave out?
DMed you my CV, anyone else who wants to see it is welcome to DM me
My current CV is very close in formatting and content to whatever I applied to grad school with
Also a lot of academics will have their CV on their website, you can look at what they have
There are a lot of good templates on Github!
I've been looking at a few (esp in the areas I'd go into) and it's surprisingly fewer than I thought
Like you'll easily find stand-alone lists of research output, but not really cvs
There are certainly examples out there though, like more than a few, which should hopefully be enough
I've got a handful now, fortunately enough to give me a good idea
Although professors' CVs will look different from the CVs of undergrads applying to graduate school, so beware
The examples I'm working off are all in the range of "just about to start PhD" to "just finishing first year of PhD"
That’s fair but as far as inspiration goes I think it’s fair
I don’t exactly have much to put so really the only difference between my academic and “normal” cv is that I remove the waffle about what I did in my jobs for my academic and add a bit of waffle about my interest and some more notable results
#dynamical-systems would be your best bet if you’re looking to talk about them
Any advice for writing a personal statement for PhD apps?
I know that it's supposed to be more about research interests and what I'm good at than personal stories, but I'm not quite sure how to structure it
here are a couple examples it helps you figure out a structure: #graduate-applications message
math/music double major here (as a result have had little to no time to pursue math research opportunities during my undergrad, certainly nothing substantial or publishable); how should i generally approach my statement of purpose without it sounding like i'm trying to weasel my way out of not having much experience?
even if you haven't done research before, if you're applying to grad school, then there's some reason you want to go. discuss whatever that is, e.g., previous academic experiences and research topics/areas you're interested in/what you might want to specialize in during grad school
adcoms dont take excuses
they want to see you really are committed to doing math
so just focus on what you did do
Thank you so much
noted ty
Also, most of the math I know is from self-studying, not from coursework. I go to a small liberal arts college and there isn't a good course selection here so my transcript will be relatively weak. Is there any way to overcome this in my application?
I've heard that the math GRE is helpful for people applying from less well-known programs or programs with fewer math courses
Re: self-study, can you have your recommenders vouch for you about that?
Is an 820 good or should I retake?
I think that's great! The DGS at my undergrad institution told me to submit if and only if your score is ≥ 800
What percentile
Yes. Mention that you self studied. My advisor gave me that advice, they have your transcript, they know you took classes, but tell them what they don’t know, show that you have a drive and passion for maths
you should have at least one of your recommendation letters attest to this, probably more is better
the fact that you self-studied i mean
ideally you would have done a reading course with a prof and gotten a letter from them
you can also demonstrate knowledge of a topic by showing you studied stuff that comes “after,” like if you self-studied point-set topology and subsequently studied differential geometry (as evidenced by a rec letter), it’d be implicit that you had indeed learned point-set topology
just generally having your rec letter(s) highlight your preparation for graduate studies in ways that implicitly address any gaps in your transcript would be good
Have a small weird query about CV formatting. Along with my degree, I have also been taking courses from a different uni (around 18 including present courses). Though I generally submit the non-degree transcript under additional docs, I never explicitly mentioned about me taking non-degree courses on CV. Do you people think it is okay to include a line about this in my CV under education or should I not include it?
Yes, especially if the courses are advanced math courses
Does the McGill MSc program have rolling admissions? The information isn't available online as far as I can tell
are yall familiar with anyone who transitioned to Graphics Programming research from a Math background?
How are you guys preparing for GRE. If anyone has taken the test in past, how did you prepare?
Any suggestions would be really helpful
in the paragraph of my statement of purpose where I talk about why I want to be in a certain program, is it worth mentioning the fact that I like the city it happens to be located in?
(I have a much stronger reason for applying, but like,, would they appreciate me saying something nice about the city too or should i not bother and keep my word count down hahaha)
I think It is generally not recommended, only if it ties into your reasons for applying like access to industry hubs. Focus primarily on academic, professional, and program-specific. Make your word count carefully.
Good luck on your letter !
Chat what would applying to Chinese schools as an American look like?
You still have a few months left. You've got this
(assuming you're applying in the US; idk what application timelines are like elsewhere)
this but for japanese schools
in canada
so applications will open in like half a month ish for most schools here iirc
Japanese schools are a big pain. A lot of beaurocracy. Many even require general GRE while it has been abolished or kept as not required in most other places. Lots of documents are needed while the deadlines are often very short. Many require you to take tests in person in Japan while some might ask you to send notarized documents through post or in-person. You will also need to pay for a PhD unless you get a scholarship (MEXT, departmental or university).
Deadlines for many schools are usually in May or June, so you might already be late for quite a few.
You will also need supervisor approval in many places before proceeding with the application, so you need to mail few profs and see who can take you in.
Hi, i am from singapore and planning to apply for a phd program in mathematics. I don't want to do a Master's before the PHD so my options seem quite limited to either staying in Singapore or applying to programs in the US. In singapore, the PhD only takes 4 years while in the US, its around 6 and I find it very hard to justify applying to the US but I wanted to hear what others think. Would going for a shorter program in a less prestigious institution make sense to you?
I get not wanting to move abroad. But, it isnt ideal and what you should do depends on your goals.
Doing a shorter phd doesn’t help you. It’s less time to do research.
Yea
Probably reasonably common
There just isnt a big incentive. That one extra year can make a big difference.
would you all think there is a large difference in terms of opportunity?
oh i see, im surprised
Ya
What is the rush
just trying to understand abit more
If you want to go into industry it could make sense to graduate early. Thats why it depends on your goals.
i see, it seems like doing a longer phd is a good idea. I originally thought that maybe finishing earlier might give me more options and singapore is my home country so life would naturally be abit easier for me there
Once again thats why i said it could make sense
I know a few people that graduate after 4 just bc they had jobs lined up.
What's the appeal of grad school? Isn't the AI just gonna learn it all for us anyway?
It feels like there's a wave of compaction coming, fewer students and more experts, or more expert students at the bleeding edge, directing AI learners?
it has no actual "knowledge"
it's just clumsily trying to probabilistically predict the next word in the sentence
which is uh
not conducive to anything mathematically coherent
People like doing math and want to do more math
Doing math and having something else do math for you are not the same
Writing a personal statement is fun because every time I look up examples it's something like "During my 5th REU that summer I had the wonderful opportunity to collaborate with Terrence Tao and Srinivasa Ramanujan on a major unsolved problem in inverse motivic inter-universal Teichmuller theory" and I still have no idea what I'm supposed to write
"in my math 69420 course i solved 50000 big open problems please let me into MIT 😁"
felt 😭 i have nothing by comparison
my personal statement had 1 sentence about the 1 reu i did
i didnt remember anything i did that summer nor did i perform particularly well
the one i went to was too short for me to get anything substantial done and i was fumbling around in the dark with no prior experience
do i even list it
Yea
i feel that man
i got no clue where to even begin
@wheat grove @viral idol
I make no promises it's a good statement but I can send you my statement if you want just DM me (this offer goes for any and all people in this channel). I got rejected from some schools but also got into a few so it can't be all bad I think? But also Google personal statements, there are plenty out there for you to get a rough outline of.
^ same here!
Either it is or isn't serious and in any case it doesn't deserve any attention
(Also those who DMed me I see it I'm just not at my laptop rn so I can't send stuff)
Hello guys, I'm looking for someone who study at UniTo, because I'm interested in applying to the PhD program next year.
I'd like to know some details about the application and how it is to live in Italy, since I will be an international student
Turin?
Yeah
would it be appropriate to email the listed email address for grad admissions comms about whether the math program at the university is a good fit for students with interest in probability alongside more pure areas of math
particularly, i dont wanna do a stats program because i am interested in areas of math that i wouldnt get to study as a part of that
but i would ideally like to do a math program that allows me to do a good amount of probability (which i think is most programs, but some programs i understand house their probability in a stats dept)
Does having a 4yr UG + 3 yr masters create a negative impact on my grad applications especially for the very top unis even if I have done lots of grad level courses/reading projects? As far as I have seen, everyone got into PhD immediately after a bachelor's in these top unis [say the top 10 math departments in US]. I don't have much hopes from these unis though.
Also, how much do they care about unrelated upper undergrad/grad level courses if let's say I am applying for commutative algebra but I have courses in analytical number theory and pde.
My understanding is that if you do a masters in between UG and PhD
then your standards for admission are higher
i.e. they expect you to have used those 3 years productively
so if you did alot of grad courses, reading projects, maybe a masters thesis, good letters, a paper, whatever
should be ok
if you just spent 3 years twiddling your thumbs doing little more than passing classes then it may not be ok
this is what I was told when debating the same thing when I was applying to grad schools
you should be able to figure this out by looking at the department website
yup yup.
very helpful, thanks.
How do you deal with the case when one of the people you may ask to write you a letter of recommendation is also someone you will be applying to do a PhD with?
They will recuse themselves from consideration of your application
Useful context here: where are you?
I have a very strong suspicion that the UK/EU answers to this and the US answers to this are not the same
i think the european answer is that they already know if they will take you as a student and it comes down to whether they can get funding for you
Can you indicate in your application that you have interest in working with more than one faculty member? I don't mean co-supervision, I mean that you do not indicate exactly one faculty member. From an adcom's perspective, does it indicate your mind is not sufficiently made up if the faculty members are in different fields?
Context: this is for applications to a canadian MSc
Yes, applications usually allow for listing multiple potential supervisors
i listed like 4 different profs when i applied to my current institution
Cool, thanks
im not applying to grad school till next year but i noticed that UCSD doesnt require the GRE anymore, just recommends the subject test. kinda hype
"recommended" is basically a euphemism for "required to be competitive" no?
basically, unless you are very competitive already, yes

i know someone who was a final candidate for a top 10 mgre requiring school without submitting for example
those are very rare
yeah but personally im just lazy to do the normal gre too
if im to do it at lal
all
general GRE is worse than useless in providing any useful info to an admissions committee lmao
then why does ASU math ask for it 😭
If you do bad at general GRE math section then that is a big red flag
What is a good enough gre score?
On the general gre math section?
perfect
arguably easier than SAT math
if you’re not acing that section consistently then that’s a major problem
Isn’t that like less than GCSE lol
Yeah
If you aren't getting close to perfect scores on general gre math, that's a red flag
math subject test
FWIW, the grad director at my undergrad institution would tell people to submit if and only if you got ≥ 800
Interesting. That's like around 55/66 right?
Oh for the subject test, some schools (the obvious suspects) wants 80+ percentile
I am very paranoid about silly mistakes. I wish the paper was a bit harder with lesser problems.
Yes well, it is what it is
Fortunately it's a lot less widely required than in the past
since so fewer people take the mgre these days, you'll need around 850+ to break 80 percentile
what are the obvious suspects 😭 i know ucla says 80% but others schools are so opaque
liek uc berkeley says 50 percentile or higher and i know that's a lie
the wait to get GRE scores is so agonizing 😭
Berkeley Harvard mit Stanford
Ah i see
I remember hearing that some of those want higher than 90/95
Particularly Harvard
they want people for which the math gre is "not too hard" in the sense that 95 percentile is completely reasonable, easy even
I’m curious how you all know this
In general it feels like there’s such a lack of transparency for PhD applications, whereas there’s CDS and tons of info out there for undergrad admissions
Also how do people stop worrying abt grad admissions stuff 🙏 I’m going through it feeling stressed all the time
for me, just meeting with my advisors/professors often to talk abt the process
well, for grad admissions, its even easier, all you need is 3 outstanding letters of rec from 3 fields medalists
If I did summer research freshman year that didn't result in any new discoveries should I still mention this in my personal essay?
Yes, undergraduate research rarely leads to to new discoveries. It's something important to talk about and definitely worth mentioning if it helped you solidify your intent to apply to grad programs
I'm planning to apply to graduate schools next year (not this year), so have some time to prepare. I have a good amount of natural talent, but have been beset by mental health challenges that have dragged my grade quite far down (3.24 GPA, but it might improve to 3.5 or so if a petition to retroactively withdraw from one quarter goes through) and caused me to take quite a while to graduate (my tenth year is coming up).
I'm still hoping to apply to some top schools, especially MIT, since this is where a lot of research I'm interested in is happening (complexity theory).
I've been able to secure good recommendations in the past, but it's been a while and I think for reasons I won't go into most of those recommenders would not write as well about me again. Still, I have one from an REU six years ago, and another that I'm writing a paper with now who isn't at a very prestigious college but would probably write a more recent/positive letter. I also have a year to prepare and find a professor to potentially write a third letter (not sure if more is better or what the cap to letters is?).
I'm also willing to put a lot of effort into anything that would help my cause. I've found myself becoming very high functioning and self-motivated once my mental health struggles were conquered, so it's fine if something involves a lot of work like having to learn a new subject on my own, but I don't have much time and want to be as competitive as possible, so I'm wondering what the best way for me to do this would be?
In the US, pretty much every program will ask for 3 letters. Several may allow for a fourth, but 3 is the number to go for
Another thing I'll recommend is to discuss your extenuating circumstances on your application to help explain your grades, but framing everything as "medical complications" over mental health challenges
As for the last question, have you asked your advisors/current professors/recommender for their advice?
Also, I feel like this might be a case where a strong GRE math subject score (see the discussion from yesterday) would be really helpful
I think the best way for you to be as competitive as possible is to get into contact with the professors that you're on good terms with, and ask them what they think. Also, they'd be good at identifying schools that would be a good match for you.
From what I've seen in the graduate game, who your letter writers know can make a world of a difference
That's a good point, I'll ask them as well.
Talk to faculty you know well on where to apply. Feel free to apply wherever you want but with your profile I'd apply very broadly. Places like MIT are insane for theory. Also, idk if there is that much complexity theory at MIT right now. I think the main people are Ryan Williams and Dor Minzer. But Dor Minzer mostly works on PCP stuff which is a much different flavor than what Ryan does.
do people email prof they want to work with for the school they are applying?
They do if they have valuable things to say
i know some people who just email profs saying they are interested in certain topics when theyve just read the abstract of couple of the profs paper. Dunno if thats helpful
No that isn't
Mention how it peaked your curiousity in math and why it compelled you to pursue a career in mathematics research
For Applied Math profs in countries where direct PhD is rare
What (if anything) should I infer from the fact that most of the previous masters students a prof has advised have gone into industry (I think without going to a PhD program)
seems normal for applied math
TBH if this is a prof you really really want to work with
i.e. you'd only apply to work with them or maybe one other person
doesn't hurt to ask directly something along the lines of "I want to go into academia. Do students of yours end up going into good academic positions if they want to?"
idk there's probably a better phrasing
but profs are chill in my experience about this kind of question
question, i have 2 probably strong rec letters (one from a prof I was doign research with) and a third letter that i was originally gonna get from a prof i did an REU with, but tbh that reu wasnt very productive and im worried that letter is pretty mid. Even more evidence is that a teammate in the same REU submitted that same prof's rec letter to an REU this past cycle and they gave him feedback saying the letter "wasn't doing him any favors". I doubt the letter is saying bad things, but its probably not saying anything excellent either. Should I try and work closely with a professor this quarter that im taking grad topology with to see if he can write me a letter, or should I stick with the reu letter? Im also wondering if its too weird if I attended an reu but dont submit that letter. any thoughts or opinions
You have a lot of reason to be skeptical about the REU letter. If possible you can ask if they can confidently write you a strong letter. If they answer no, or have some hesitation then you have your answer.
An instructor that you take graduate course work is in a great position to speak to your ability to succeed in graduate coursework (which is a big part of graduate school!) If you already have a good letter from an REU mentor, then that letter will speak for your research ability/potential. I wouldn't worry about not having two research letters.
What is the etiquette/expectation wrt emailing professors who you might want to work with before applying for PhD in Canada?
do you have a masters?
I will have (I start my 1 year masters in the UK in a couple weeks)
except for some professors who explicitly say not to it seems like most are open to getting emails from students ahead of the deparmental applications coming in
or they even prefer it
at least from what I heard
(actually I just heard back from a prof in my masters search)
good luck by the way!
madrig
pls keep this chat to graduate application questions please! 🥶
that is generally useful, but you also need to identity funding sources
the university should have some, and there might be some external ones via scholarship schemes and the like
I would think that is extremely rare. It would not matter if people had funding, it would typically just be a time sink for me. Personally I have never heard about such a thing. I do occasionally accept people doing a undergraduate thesis, then I get compensated with 1% of teaching (not really worth it).
Maybe this is a thing at other places?
It depends on where you are
It’s very common in the US, and not unheard of in the UK, from what I know
how do you tell if you're cut out for pure maths. i'm mostly looking at departments/profs doing applied research but do think about pure research sometimes (most likely in quasi-applied analysis fields like probability/stochastic processes/pdes/numerical analysis/calculus of variations)
thing is i've struggled in most of the pure math courses ive taken
there are various grant-funded positions that you can apply for with a professor (or sometimes the department already has a quota they can fill and has their own internal application)
and yes emailing a prof also works
sometimes your school will have its own hiring platforms which will include RA positions for undergraduates (mine does)
including the ones i'm taking now in measure theory and measure theoretic probability (and it's still early in the term)
in the US there are things called REUs (research experiences for undergraduates) where professors do exactly this; i.e., they think of unsolved problems that can be attacked by smart undergraduates. In official NSF programs they are given grants for their efforts but at good research universities many professors are up to work with undergraduates. As an example, i research under a professor as an undergraduate and he does not get paid for it
REUs are typically time limited right? not a "position"
REUs are yes, but for me ive been working with my professor for almost 2 years
also nowadays top US universities honestly expect undergraduate research from competitive applicants
either that or like other exceptional things
(Sweden)
ah yea makes sense, in the US as im sure u know undergrads can go straight to phd but its definitely difficult, way easier to go ms then phd
scrolling back and I'm a ug in this situation (ie british) looking to apply to US universities. do you think the research component of my integrated master's gives me a shot at us unis?
For sure, I don’t think MMaths are as common over there but they do a masters as part of their PhD typically anyway, I don’t see why not
I'm wondering if they'll see me like a productive ug or a msci who did very little
from the former pov I look decent and from the latter compared to people who do years of paper writing etc i look pretty bad
depends what you mean by cut out. the only way to really know is to try grad school and see if you do really good research. Before that id say doing really way in courses provides some indication
for math there are 3 things I would say
1: Look at REUs (this is the most obvious answer)
2: profs you've taken classes with an enjoyed, ask them to do some directed reading where you read through a textbook or something under them
this is probably more valuable mathematically to you than a toy UG research project and you can still get a good letter out of this
3: if you have skills such as programming or whatever that can apply to other sciences / applied areas, maybe look for UG research in those areas
I did UG research in control theory in the aerospace department and it was alot of programming and graph theory stuff
I’m taking GRE there you go
How do I deal with feeling like I need to do some more reading around the interests of people I’m applying to for PhDs (and especially the ones I want to work with more so - note this is in a Europe context where you’re applying to the supervisor from the start) with the fact that I kinda feel like I might be burning out a bit?
Like it feels like “if I don’t do enough reading I’m less likely to get the PhD so [insert all my brain’s catastrophising around not getting a PhD]” so I can’t not
But also if I keep doing so, I’ll burn out even before term starts?
Usually the summer between undergrad and phd is spent recovering from burn out
I’m currently in the summer between undergrad and (1 year) masters
Probably? but rn that very much feels like too little too late
And preparing yourself for more
That message feels fairly tone deaf given my original message
I think burnout is pretty dangerous
So I’d lean more towards avoiding it
Yeah
I especially know with term coming up
But also PhDs
But term
Etc
Good luck
does anyone feel like the princeton review 4th edition gre subject practice test harder than the actual gre?
the princeton review practice is actually much easier than the actual gre
wtf i nailed the gre subject practice test but took too much time for the princeton review
im cooked
the older practice tests are easier than the modern gre
idk why they dont give us more new gre tests
to leave students in the dark and extort more cash from them
also is lame some schools still take it
skillset hardly overlaps at all with research
i even find the recent one (gr3768) to be much easier than the princeton review. but either way if princeton review is much easier then its joever
yeah i just plug integral into wolfram and be happy
literally
OK pretty sure princeton is much harder
is there a way to access that practice test without buying princeton review
Sail the open seas of the internet
i am going to my associates degree in like 8 months, is it just math i need to do, if not tell my what it is i need to do
ian coley website
they write up their solution too
and a note
those are a better representation of the actual exam than the princeton review 4th edition (cracking the gre subject math). Based on my experience with an actual gre, princeton much more difficult for some reason
even the older practice exams?
older practice exams trend easier
WAIT I KNOW THAT GUY
Funny to see his name mentioned
this isn't really the place for that; this channel is about applying to graduate school
ohhh
i thought it was graduate level applications of math lol
field ?

it still aint that much off imo
pure math ?
anyone here from TIFR Mumbai or ICTS?
This isn't a good place to have this conversation, move it to one of the discussion channels
i just finished undergrad and am looking for some advice for applying to grad school. is anyone around willing to answer a few questions?
Might be easier to just ask your questions
Then if people can answer they can just do it and ping ya
fair enough
i am interested in theoretical physics, but not sure if that is what mathematical physics is for, or if i should apply to a physics program
put it like this: i can apply to a mathematical physics program this fall, as i just graduated with a pure mathematics degree. if i wanted to apply to a physics program, i would need to take some physics courses first and i wouldn’t be able to apply until next fall
however, i want the problems and content to be more of a physics flavor than a pure mathematics flavor. so if mathematical physics is highly divorced from the physics, i may be less interested in it
What are some schools that are good in Model theory and Algebra and Number theory (both alg and analytic)? Not limited to any region.
ucla probably
anymore in europe? they might be a bit easier to get in 
im just basing these suggestions based off of julia wolf at cambridge and caroline terry at uic
oh i meant more like good in all those area (mainly because im pretty undecided)
i figured but im not sure what schools are "good" in all three of those areas. Take a look yourself and decide whether they're "good"
yeah im doing that rn but also want some input from others.
Julia Wolf is at Cam, but I wouldn't say that Cambridge is very strong on model theory type things, Oxford might be better?
Do y'all have any thoughts on schools that care a lot about math GRE subject test scores? I got a score that should be a benefit to pretty much any school I apply to, but I imagine some schools weight it more heavily than others
I have heard that UCLA cares about mGRE scores through one of the professor's websites, but other than that I don't have much insight, and most material online is for the converse case
i dont work in model theory so i have no idea. The only two people ik that work on it are julia wolf and caroline terry so i mentioned them.
Anyone here's who's doing a PhD in Paris-Saclay? I'm slightly confused about the requirements to get in for a PhD. It seems like they want me to have a thesis topic and a professor before I send in the application? So am I supposed to just contact professors directly for this?
I'm not in France nor have I applied there, but the impression I got was that to get in it's strongly preferred to do M2 in France, so that you're "in the system" so to speak
M2 being a 2 year masters?
So in France a masters is 2 years, but you can do the two years separately
Called M1 and M2 resp
so to get into an M2 you need to have done one year of masters
I want to say yes
(I don't know about Paris-Saclay specifically, also I'm not in maths, but if the application form says you need a supervisor then that's probably it. In any case applying directly to professors is not uncommon)
I see, thank you!
Is it a very bad look to not have a letter from a prof you worked with? I did a short summer project with a prof and we published something out of it, and he has given me a soft rejection for a letter.
I don't have much in the way of advice, but I think it would be relevant to also mention whether you have other letters.
I would guess that if so, it shouldn't be a big deal, but others will have better judgement having been through the graduate application process
Also, I don't know if it matters too much whether it is "bad" now if they have already rejected you - what more is there to do?
Well it was a soft rejection and I am not sure if I should prod further and make it an explicit rejection, also if it weakens my application it affects which places I apply to.
Yes I do have other letters
But no other publications
Ah that makes sense; others will have more input than me
Oh I read that they didn't publish anything, wow yeah that is surprising now that I read it again
Ah I'm not sure if it's a good idea to give the exact wording of the email
I can tell you on dm though
maybe the prof is, say, a postdoc and thinks the letter is not worth much
No he isn't a postdoc, but he does have a reputation for being a bit strict in terms of who he writes for and how many letters he writes
Ive heard it can be
Id take a soft rejection as a rejection.
what is a soft rejection
replied on dm
Getting a reality check is always fun
Is there an emotional support group for grad apps
Maybe a discussion channel
so
its hard to make any conclusion without more details. There are situations where what your friend did is stupid and others where it makes sense.
i dont know how to draw that conclusion from your original statement. I assumed you were making a statement about the competitiveness of grad school and people doing things that are somewhat superficial to maximize probability to get into a good grad school rather than out of interest.
colleges send out spammy emails to every student who attends one of their events right
or rather, the colleges that do it, do it universally
Usually not for graduate admissions
i see
there are a few universities who have been sending me emails but they're also like... hard to get into so i don't really want to take it too seriously
uchicago sends me some stuff post-getting a fee waiver from them and uc berkeley keeps sending me stuff after one of their admissions events
Oh yeah they do that
also im not clear on whether getting a fee waiver from them is a good sign, since they say its "competitive" and i also didnt actually check off any of their given programs
U Chicago just wants to boost their applicant count to reduce admission rates, even for phd programs for whatever reason
i have no research, awards, or independent study
i want to research and teach foundational logic in the future, but im genuinely at a loss on what i should do
obviously berkeley and harvard have good logic, but no way in hell im getting in there
this leaves like bloomington, notre dame, iowa
but i really doubt ill make it there
any school that actually teaches this stuff seems completely outside of my reach at this point
im also at a nobody undergrad school lol, none of my professors can vouch for my logic knowledge
first, can i actually get into schools like iu bloomington, notre dame, iowa, etc?
what schools have what im looking for that i can actually get into
second, what can i actually do right now to try to get into a logic school?
im taking both gre in october, and i cant get a glowing letter about my logic self-study, but i can get good letters
how much would these letters even matter tho, if i dont have any concrete statements like "this student can study on his own, and do research"
because literally every single professor in my math department i spoke with didnt even want to look at the self study cause they 'dont know anything about it'
i can send my self study to the colleges, sure
maybe write it out in sop
idk, its hard to consider all at this and not think im genuinely ngmi
u should probably consider masters programs
they are easier to get into and as long as u take advantage of the 2 years u can have a better cv for phd apps
ill look into masters
ive heard there are not many masters in logic that actually fund
do you think theyll particularly care about my self-study?
a lot of the professors told me to email anyone i can find online and just pray someone reads it
by self-study u mean you have been working through a textbook or something? yea i mean its probably a good thing to say it in an sop if nothing else but yes a letter from a professor corroborating that u truly did self-study and know it well will be much more impactful
yeah to the textbook
but the point of masters programs is as far as im aware its much more possible to get into one as long as u have good grades and u took advanced classes
and you could maybe aim for schools that have a professor in logic
i made the mistake of going to nobody college lol
the only prof i took with this was undergrad intro proofs
and he didnt even like it lol
and none of the profs actually want to read it
theyre all referring me to each other lol
even the department head didnt want to read it
i mean it makes sense, its all very fragile and specific, you have to be incredibly careful, how do you write a letter for a student if you cant verify it
what are they reading?
i did model and proof theory of propositions and predicates
like algebraic provability logics etc
im going off gabbay and guenthered's handbook
so are you asking them to check ur answers or something
im asking them to read it or check or literally anything
i see, yea if they arent like well-versed in the subject already then that would be a hassle. Unfortunate that nobody is willing to help though
still, mentioning it on an application to a master program may be enough along with good grades and coursework n such
I don't think self study, unless it was actively performed under a prof, is usually mentioned by a prof on a letter
Like, you sort of just have to accept it's for your own longterm learning there's not a good way to have it "verified"
but idk what else to do, the only thing they offer here is intro proofs for undergrads
You're at a 2 year uni?..
right that was the intent, but i have nothing else to go off, so i was hoping to have any leverage
4 year
You should still mention the self study and the specific subject
u mean that was ur only "logic" class?
Is this not the US?.. what do you mean by "the only thing"
surely not ur only proofs class
I've been to absolute bottom of the barrel unis, there is so standardization and they all have to teach certain things, even if very poorly
they have graph theory too but thats different
so they dont have real analysis, abstract algebra, etc..?
foundational logic
Mathematical logic is just one field
right, its just my particular passion
did u take other upperdivision math courses?
Yes so it's unfortunate your uni is like that but in terms of graduate applications (not so sure about Europe) they're not going to look for whether you've specialized already
You can just look to do your study of logic at graduate school
i took some courses which were cotaught with the grad courses, but not strictly
wdym upper div exactly
as long as u took other difficult math classes and did well in them that may be enough for certain masters programs, which as they said will hopefully be enough to allow u to study what u want
i took a few which are upper divs for my undergrad degree
This is a nobody college but it has a grad program?..
I've been to a nobody college, there is no grad program there
its a 4 year city uni
You mentioned graduate courses
i never took actual grad credits
but matrix theory was literally taught with the 6000 course
I mean, is there a logic grad sequence
i havent had time to fit grads cause i made the silly choice of double majoring
so im maxing out my schedule for requirements only lol
I mean, if you don't have the time to study it why are you upset about that in the first place
Sorry I joined in the middle maybe I should scroll and see the question
im not upset at it
i just self study in my free time
i just think its highly relevant that i havent taken anything besides that intro proofs course wrt this topic, and im trying to get into an actual program on it
like that definitely doesnt look good, if i had to guess
Okay yeah from what I read it seems it's already been answered, you don't need to study logic now to get into a good program to study logic. But you do need to verifiably study something, so you should be taking grad math courses if you really want a good chance at teaching logic in the future
Also choose something the profs at your school do know about, learn that, and ask them to vouch for you on it in rec letters
That's at least for American system (idk if you've responded yet with whether you're in America), non-American is very different
im already a senior, ive literally never had time to fit grad level courses in my schedule because i hit the maximum allowed hours almost every semester
i can ask to do more hours, but i think i would die
Sounds like infernic's advice was good then
ill look into masters programs
do you think i can reasonably find a funded program knowing this?
No
right
Does it need to be funded?
Maybe partial funding, I just know full funding is much less likely
i figured so
I'm not super familiar with financials, others will be much more helpful with that
All I know is that if you're already worried about being a weak candidate funding is probably less likely
maybe blow the gre out of the water
Are you applying this fall?
Maybe if you'd asked a semester or two ago I could say something more, but I think what infernic offered is the best advice so far.
For the rec letters just make sure they are good; they don't have to be profs that you did self study or research under, and it doesn't have to be logic stuff.
If you can fit in some sort of program or build a relationship with a prof from any field that would be great, but it does seem hard to do in 2 months.
thats bleak
Depends on if you can afford the masters because that at least buys you two years
I guess the word "buy" here is really pulling weight 😂😅
But I don't know much about financials, hopefully someone else will have better news
if you really would like to be a logician, then it may be smart to consider the option where u go into industry and save up money for a masters later
because even if u could get into a meh funded phd program right now, a not so good phd will block u from ever getting a job as a researcher
"Wait, having money and still getting to use my brain is a pretty good deal, even if everyone around me thinks pi=3"
yea i mean and u can always study logic on ur own time too
right
until you can save the money for a masters program from which u can get into a good phd ideally
i was just really wanting to do research and teach it as well
something like that anyway
yea, lots of people do thats why the apps are so competitive 😅
and not many spots
ig ill just try to apply to good programs and go engi if i dont get in
save for a masters
could i do independent research and leverage that while im outside college?
If you haven't published anything before, publishing independently is basically impossible
Even if you have it's very hard
yeah it was worth asking
thinking of questions is some peoples jobs lol
but u may be able to contact professors and sit in on grad classes at some school or do an independent study with a professor, youd probably have to cold email a lot tho
if ur lucky theyll write u a letter
thanks for the advice
its definitely possible, just gonna have to be persistent and stuff. good luck
we all need it
On masters I’m pretty sure you can get some covered by TAing but I would look into this more
Also if u have the money to apply or have fee waivers it doesn’t hurt to try applying to some schools which have nice logic programs! You can mention in your application that your program does not have much for logic but that you were super excited by it so you studied it on your own and are excited to go to a program with a robust logic dept
oh im definitely applying lol
like TAing in masters? do you think i have a shot anywhere that has a math logic program?
yes theyre saying it is possible to get some funding by being a TA during the masters
Is that really the case?
getting a phd from a 'meh' school wont block you from being a researcher, but its much less likely
Academic or industry research? I've heard that it would block you from academic positions since prestige is a pretty big factor
I guess it depends what you mean by industry research. Being a researcher at most of the big tech research labs is as prestigious as being in academia.
Its not like there is just tons of math adjacent research being done in industry.
That's fair. I don't think you'd be as locked out at getting a scientific researcher role at Oak Ridge Labs by going to a smaller school as compared to applying for tenure track roles at T10 institutes
im not familiar with government labs
Networking is a lot more important for getting a job at government labs
But also having research that aligns with current national funding priorities
i believe you can get a phd through ornl at utk
this is probably the best way to get into the lab itself
Yeah, I'm just making what I perceive to be a relevant distinction since it seems 'easier' to get industry jobs in comparision to the networking factor
makes sense when you live in a society
But also compounds inequity which isn’t fun
You can say that no matter what
If it wasnt based on networking just exams people would say thats unfair to people with test anxiety etc
ucsd is not taking any phd applicants this year 
dude im so sad abt that
I don’t think it’s only ucsd that’s gonna have to do so this year
website says they accepted too many people last year
just a matter of time before more schools announce similarly
but still definitely is related to funding issues
its ok guys dont fret because in 2027 phds will be completely eliminated
“we fully expect to resume admissions in 2027” and other lies to tell yourself when going to sleep at night
i hope my institution takes students, they skipped a year recently
funding is not looking good
it was hard already, this is just tragic
ucsd took too many students aprtially because so many trickled down from the smaller cohorts across the board
now the trickling continues
europe gonna be flooded with american international students in like 3 years i swear
maybe masters
most american phd aspirants arent strong enough for a european phd when they graduate
if they dont have a masters, then by requirements they cant be right
in europe you have to have a masters before a phd iirc
Nah, I think that this overblown to a great extent
it’s just one school
this has happened in many recent application cycles
maybe things will get worse but seems super premature
math departments will have money to hire TAs even without NSF funding
Yes but definitely at a reduced rate
When was the page updated with this announcement? I dont remember seeing this last time I checked
has to be within the last 2 days cuz i checked a couple days ago
sad, i had already looked at the professors i wanted to work with
just hours ago
The MS/MA program is open, so if you don't already have a MS/MA you can try to get in and transfer to the PhD program
thats hella money though
Yeah, I didn't do a MS/MA at a UC for that reason. CSUs were much cheaper, but had more limited research opportunities. It was difficult in going from the MS to PhD at a CSU, whereas for UCs that offer the MS/MA, it seems that if you do well, then it's not so difficult to move to the PhD program.
But ofc there are no guarantees
I think they got hit pretty hard with federal funding for them being cut completely this year
How the hell do you even get into princeton
Be good
I dont know enough Princeton people to say. The people ik there are what you might expect: top student at top ug with good research experience and other accolades like imo.
preferably be a child genius or publish in a top journal
Go to ivy as an undergrad
in turn, youll need 36 act, 4.0 gpa from highschool, and many ap courses for ivy undergrad
You dont have to but thats not enough. You still have to be a top student at the ivy
right
I mean im already in undergrad
I dont go to an ivy but my school has some pretty good mathematicians
Top 50 school i think
At least in math
top 50 maybe
still a hard ask
plus they look at your gpa and courses down to high school
I mean yeah its princeton lol
Oh if they want high school then im cooked
No they dont
This doesn't get you into any ivy anymore
Seems ridiculous that they'd do that
But irrelevant to this channel
idk about princeton specifically, but my sisters hs transcript killed her from harvard
Focus on doing your best. There are good schools in the top 50 where you can get a good education and be competitive for top schools.
I dont remember submitting my hs transcript to harvard.
oh i see, i apologize then
Yeah, none of the Ivies ask for high school data
I think i may have had to upload transcripts of college courses i took in high school
maybe thats what she meant idrk
Yeah i for sure have been doing that
Honestly its not that i want to get into any specific ivy
Itd just be cool to be doing frontier research in an area of math i love
its much more important to go to colleges that specialize in that field than trying to get into ivy
at least from what ive been told
your high school stats stop mattering around the time you step onto your college campus
Yeah
But princeton being the best math school and all its interesting to think about what it takes to be competitive for it
I mean its probably 90% a lottery but still
i feel like princeton is much less a lottery than other places
you probably know if youre getting an offer
every second u spend thinking abt how to optimise getting into [school] is time u culd spend doing smth productive
True
But it was just a quick curiosity of mine
it really depends on the pool tho, if nobody applied this cycle, youd have an easy time getting in :P
Heh fair enough
our place is kinda screwed
cause it sent out acceptances in early jan + committed to not cancelling
so we had like twice? as many this yr than usuals
so i strongly beliebe there wont be a lot of spots for this yr
i think places like ucsd are being nice
they could still have an application process and just admit 1 student
it makes sense ngl
.
the answer is we dont know bc theres not enough reliable datasets
ppl give u anecdotes
Should I write my personal statement/statement of purpose in the same style as when i did it for undergrad?
I’m just worried about sounding robotic if I just go down the list of things they want
absolutely not
this is not undergrad admissions where you try to sob story your way in
*US undergrad admissions
true

but for a grad statement focus on why you’re interested in grad school and how your experiences have informed your interest etc
UT Austin wants the GENERAL GRE and the math is optional!?!?!?!?!?
im going insane. i only registered for math subject gre, because at the time that i registered to take it UT's requirements for this year hadn't updated and they didnt even require it at all, only berkeley and irvine did out of the schools im applying to and they wanted the subject test. if im applying to UT, i have to submit scores by their deadline right? so then I have to take it like... soon with minimal prep 😭
i mean i hear the general is pretty easy both on the math and non-math questions but like. that's just additional stress i have to go through and money i have to spend. grrrrrrrrr
what makes you say that?
ut austin will be losing out on a lot of talent, then
the test is like trivial if youre a native english speaker
that is unfortunate
it might still be worth taking it just for UT, depending on where else youre applying and how strongly you’d consider attending if accepted
i took general gre for just 1 place i applied, where i was very interested in attending
didnt get in but i dont regret taking it at all
idk this could just be some complying with some new demand from graduate school leadership
also i thought mgre started losing popularity during pandemic
noted!
ASU is also requiring it and i was considering them at some point
especially if this actually reduces the number of applicants there
the test is really easy
assuming some english ability and familiarity with sat/act style questions
you might want to review some of the writing prompts
i glanced through them the night before i took it to get a sense for how the essay part of the test would go
maybe just do a few practice problems to build confidence
Hey
If the only places you apply is requiring gre general like this, should you take the math one too
I am international and idk what I'm doing
general is worse than useless at giving any actual useful info to an admissions committee
if they're requiring the general over the subject then that raises serious questions about what their priorities are
bruh
One of the points in their "Main criteria" literally said (and still says) "Performance on the Mathematics Subject GRE, and (less importantly) on the general GRE."
Shot in the dark but is anyone here currently in or is applying to U of T math grad programs?
wait how the hell did they pull that off
ah. so even though strictly speaking they had an incomplete application their reserach experience was so good they got in just off of that
well
i wish i had that problem lmao
i do have some research experience but it's nothing exceptional
i did my undergrad at a very bad school but i got a masters (in statistics) from a T25 in the US (but i want to do a math phd not stats)
yeah
ye
well and it looks like you can essentially take the general gre whenever, its not like the math one where there are only a handful of dates in the year and you have to register for one
xd
grfp solicitation says you have to be a first year grad student in your first grad program to be eligible... so if i have master's im SOL??
it would seem so
🫠
there are already exams for gauging english proficiency lol
gre general isnt going to do anything wrt that
im pretty sure no math department would ask for it if given the choice
it’s occasionally required some places bc the university imposed general GRE as an admission requirement for all of their graduate programs
So how are PhD applicants in general going
I know last year there were way less acceptances because of the funding cuts
(U.S.)
Will it be the same this cycle then?
probably will be the same. Doesn't seem like things are really better. The NSF didn't go away.
Darn
yea this cycle is probably so cooked
I want to ask one of my professors who taught a course that I really liked and did well in for a letter of recommendation but I don’t think he knows me that well. I spoke to him a couple times though. Is this socially acceptable and the right move or not ?
1: do you have anyone better you could ask, better as in they know you better?
2: The thing to ask would be something more along the lines of "would you be willing to write a strong letter" or "good letter" or something
I think this is the socially acceptable way to ask "can you write a letter + do you think it is a good idea for you to write a letter for me"
it's not great that they don't know you that well, hence why I asked question 1
thank you that is good advice
I don't think I know anyone better that is in a field I'm interested in sadly kind of sucks im trying to get to know people but not sure how to in a way thats not vapid
just got to do what I can
this really is an elite tier emailing strat lol
They don't have to be in a field you're interested in necessarily
My 3 letters were
1: math prof from REU I did
2: I did some applied graph theory stuff with a guy in aerospace, got a letter from them
3: I was a TA for a course in the CS department, got a letter from that prof
In a pure math program, no interest in applied math or graph theory either
what do you mean by field here
different math topic or something besides math?
sorry i think its a mistranslation
i think the proper english term is area
or discipline
all of these are vague
and my clarifying question applies equally to all of them
i think as long as theyre mathematicians it’s fine
I am interested in abelian varieties this person is doing research on abelian varieties this is what I meant
they can be nonmathematicians too but there are more ways for such letters to be bad
Oh I see the confusion
Yea I see lol
what course did you take with this prof?
a course on elliptic curves
do not restrict yourself to solely seeking letters from your specific research interest in math
generally you should get letters from people from whom you learned advanced material and also formed a semblance of a relationship with them
I see
ignore my horrible grammar
that makes sense I wasnt aware
also not all your letters have to be outstanding
ideally some of them will be from profs who know you well and can give substantive evidence of your preparation for graduate school beyond your transcript
but it’s also ok for some to be more like “did well in my class”
you can also talk to letter writers who dont know you as well about your application to give them more to say
yea I mean here were my letters lol
yeah the first two seem fine
the third seems quite suboptimal
but idk what being a TA entailed
I don't know know any proffesors well beyond talking after class and I'm not sure how I can get to know people well ahah kind of a psycho thing to type im not a robot i swear
He knew me very well, I TAed under him for 6 semesters
yea
so he knew me very very well
need to get my statement of purpose drafted and revised a bit before i can show it to my reference writers 
but we never did research or anything together (he only taught, no research)
thats good then
but I wager it was a good letter
but my point is that you don't have to only look at profs who do your area of interest
yes thank you
I am going to think about who to approach and try to get to know people somehow
going to office hours or doing reading courses is a good way
Two people have adviced me to send out emails to people whose research I find interesting in order to find phd positions (eu). What would be a good way to phrase such an email? Feels like asking for a PhD position is not usefull and possibly socially undesirable.
you may as well ask people if they can write strong letters
socially undesirable?
isnt that how it works in europe?
I wish I knew
are you not european
Yes
idk exactly how it works but some people on this server certainly will
but if you got that advice it might be good lol
you could ask people you know to forward you the emails they sent when in your position
Yes you are right it just feels kind of weird to write such an email.
In Sweden you do not need any letters of recommendation
Good to know
And here Ph.D. positions are most often just a normal job application for a specific project (there are alo other types, but less so) then you just contact the person hiring if you want to in advance
these positions are posted publically ?
yes
ok good
ty
(you need a masters)
Yea Im in masters degree rn
This is also common in basically every field in the US
If not more common than UG -> masters -> PhD
👍 it is technically possible, but I think it is pretty rare, personally never met anybody. like you say maybe for more applied fields
What's common in CS is people who work in industry getting a course-based masters
Thesis based masters is quite rare
Yes very common for people in math to go UG to PhD
Here PhD is longer, you get the masters “on the way”
Your first 2 years of phd in US are mostly reading and courses
Oh uh, maybe? I didn’t do one
UG thesis is like 50/50
I think
Probably less tbh
most fields feels like 2nd year start researching mostly
exception is alggeo
yes
at my institution, they isually graduate in 4
yes it common to go straight to phd. Seems more common than not unless you're an international student.
but funding is guaranteed for 5 and you can stay longer if you want
where did you pull these numbers
those teaching numbers are criminal
some profs want 80 hour work weeks from their students, dont work with them
they say this to justify paying you
its never 15 hours unless its finals week or something
i feel like 10 hours is a high upper bound
no point in making such a blanket statemnet
it depends very strongly on the university and the course instructor
I work 55 hours a week on average according to my time tracking stuff
This counts teaching, self study, courses, seminars, meetings
Sometimes that grows to 60 sometimes that's closer to 40
i have never worked less than 10 hours a week as a TA
usually more like 12-15
again what is true for you might not be true for others
Yea my teaching takes 12-13 hours a week
And I'm pretty efficient with my prep and grading
(maybe this is why no one comes to my office hours 😭)
Maybe at a top school but this is not universally the case (in particular, I would guess 5-10% at my school for math max)
All the schools I've been at have have had no option for undergrad "thesis", it's definitely not common
It depends what you mean by common. Its certainly not 50/50 but its definitely common.
Many schools offer them
In the US? I've been to 3 separate schools with no mention of them, so assumed they weren't. Do you have an estimate on the percentage that offer.
should I write short articles summarizing summer research results/what I learned and post them somewhere?
just so in grad apps they can link to that
I did do summer research during my undergrad, though I didnt end up publishing
two of them were more learning than trying to solve a problem and the third we're still messing around a bit
That sounds like a great idea! If your advisors are up for it, you could ask them to take a look too and see whether they think this portrays your work in the best light
But also I guess it’s worth considering that some schools explicitly say they won’t read attached papers and some have space for you to attach work
Hey all, I am planning a 1 year masters in stats and data analytics, and after some convos with my advisor it seems as though I need to decide most of my workload and what I want to take up. I have a bcs in comp sci and came here to ask if anyone has advice about interesting problems and areas to look into considering my background + the masters, some areas i should research deeper and other things you might want to share that could be helpful. Thanks in advance!
Which channel should I look for people who are interested in participating in an event (more specifically CIMPA School)?
It's a big thing in US honors programs and liberal arts colleges.
Idk about outside the US
depends on the honors program and the university
I remember at ASU you had to do a thesis to graduate in the honors program, but you could also just not do the honors program and it was only a small number of people who did the honors program anyways
I'm not qualified to actually help, but for the people who are qualified it might help to specify European/American system. If you're asking about "problems to look into" then I'm guessing you're also doing a masters with a thesis, but one year feels far too short for that to me (again not really qualified to speak about this though). I don't know if you should expect to do much research but maybe in an applied area like data analytics it's different.
Also, what are you hoping to do after the master's?
Thanks for the advice, it's a European system. Yes most programs have 2 years masters, but my faculty offers a 4+1 combination (4 undergraduate years, 1 master). A combination of research and application is what I assume is required
Okay that makes a lot more sense then
I'll be applying for a TA, and do see myself working as an assistant and going into research, but I'd be lying if I told you what my goals further down the road are
In the US it is not very common to go into masters knowing what you want, but that also makes me even less qualified
I'm curious enough to ask about things at least I suppose
that's totally fair
Yeah that's something where a backup plan is probably warranted for sure XD
So you're doing the 4-1 at your school? That narrows it down at least to professors there I assume?
correct
I think it makes sense then to try to find something that aligns with the research of faculty at your school then
Have you looked at recent papers by people there?
that is a great idea actually, I should definitely see that, haven't yet
Sometimes I'm able to offer good advice, at least that's a more universal thing that's not restricted to the American system
But maybe another person here will have further comments that are more helpful to the specific situation or to correct anything incorrect I have said
however, for stats and data analytics, the number of students enrolling in that program is very small, so doubt I'd find exact papers on that, but exploring surrounding areas should provide me with some guidance
definitely, thanks a bunch!!!
I'll have a look at papers first thing in the morning
Would a 160 verbal, 166 quantitative, 3.5 writing score on the GRE be a positive on an application for most math Master's programs where score reporting is optional? Or should I not report?
I studied Applied Mathematics as an undergraduate and am now studying art as a graduate student. I would like to study math as a PhD student.
I'm thinking about how to find letters of recommendation for my graduate school application (I want to get a PhD in pure math). I need one more letter. I'm also wondering whether any mathematicians would be willing to regularly meet with me regarding the thesis for my current art degree, which will either be based on proof assistants/interactive theorem proving or based on the work of Tom Head (I haven't solidified my decision yet).
I could take a year off between my current Master's degree in art and the next PhD application cycle, but I'm not sure what I would do within that time frame. I would need to secure funding for any possible Master's or post-bacc program completed during that time period.
Do you guys have any advice? People are generally encouraging me to apply this cycle, which is interesting. I think my application is weak, though.
Who are your current letter writers?
My undergraduate research supervisor, and my mentor (we are doing a directed reading program together).
Are they the ones encouraging you to apply this cycle
My undergraduate research was unfortunately in data science and not math. Hm, I haven’t asked them whether I should apply honestly…
Ok so it's your current drp mentor?
Who is a faculty member and not a grad student right
I talk to a ton of people about my application, all the time. One PhD student and one professor I talked to encouraged me to apply this cycle. My DRP mentor is absolutely a grad student, I didn’t know that was a bad thing.
Ok a grad student writing a letter of rec for a phd program is not great in all honesty
I see. Well, then I’m really out of letters.
Have you regularly talked to this professor
Obvious attempts, on my part, to gain research experience have been unsuccessful- research experiences enable you to build relationships with mathematicians who might write letters for you! However, I did not succeed doing that.
No, I met him on a platform that is essentially my university’s private LinkedIn.
I am open to a break that would beef up my application, so to speak, but I’m not in the place to do an unfunded Master’s or something.
Ok the only benefit of a break in my mind is that you can get a letter from whoever will supervise your thesis
Essentially my opinion as well. I don’t mind strengthening my skills or just being in school forever, without any end in sight, so another Master’s wouldn’t really bother me. I only found one funded Master’s in math, sadly (from a school I would want to attend).
Funded masters in math tend to be somewhat rare
I think that’s true.
i know of a funded masters at clemson university
Hm… if tuition is the only barrier, I might be able to do a Master’s in math. There are kind of more funding options than I initially thought, but I have to do more research. Would that be helpful for my PhD application, though? My end goal is to do research and become a math professor at a research university.
Yes it would be helpful
In canada masters are funded
I considered applying there but didn't end up doing so. It def seems worth it for those who're looking to get a bit more experience before a PhD
I want to, ultimately, become a math professor at a specific Ivy League school I have in mind. My bachelor’s degree is from a different Ivy (but I got bad grades), my Master’s is from a less selective but decently respected school, and I can see that my current options for the next school look terrible. Essentially, I would be attending schools with worse and worse academic rankings over time.
During my undergraduate studies, I got bad grades because of long-running personal issues that only subsided once I had graduated.
I wonder if, at this point, I could genuinely just go back to school to get a B.S. in pure math (instead of Applied Math) and stack up REUs. If I weren’t teaching math, I don’t know what else I would want to do with my life. I want to be able to become a professor, even if it takes me more time than the average person.
A problem - some schools actually don’t let people with a preexisting B.S. go back to school and get another one at their institution. This might be an exception to the rule, though.
i don't think going for a second bachelor's is worth it?
note also that getting faculty positions at the ivies is insanely competitive (and elsewhere due to the fucked state of academia in the US)
be realistic in your expectations
Not worth it in what sense? I want to have a more competitive academic profile.
if anything do a MS instead
a second BS is just a waste of time and money retreading shit you’ve already seen before
you are severely underestimating your competition
There are people from outside of top 50 institutions in math PhD that get postdocs at Ivy leagues, or their like. I'd say if you're looking to pursue mathematics further, and you already have a MS degree, the options are to get another MS degree or to move forward with a PhD.
It's great to have a goal in mind, but life happens. At the end of the day, it's about learning and doing mathematics. Having an ivy league undergraduate is a huge accomplishment, even with subpar grades. And pushing forward towards a MS shows a lot of tenacity. Keeping going forward into a PhD program, and who knows where you'll land afterwards. Good research is done outside of ivy leagues. Who knows when or where you'll end up in your longer term career, or what results you'll prove; but it's clear getting hung up on prestige or going back to fix things is a step backwards, not forwards.
Guys, I have a quick question. As a student studying mathematics in an online degree program, how can I secure letters of recommendation from professors? What I mean is, since there aren’t many professors in my math department—and they usually don’t interact much with undergraduates—how can I forge meaningful connections within academia?
I’m asking because I want to apply to REUs as an international student living outside the US, which means the competition is going to be, well, insane. Presumably, letters of recommendation are meant to show my “ranking” within my cohort, which is why they need to come from professors (not just lecturers), and why I’ll need several of them.
I did contact one professor in my department to ask if he’d be open to supervising an independent learning project, but he said he’s too busy with PhD supervision. I’m not sure what the best next step is…
Grad / research stipend and ta work
I’m finding it difficult to research this directly on websites belonging to Canadian universities. I would definitely like to know more. Do international students get the grad/research stipend + TA work opportunities?
Not unexpected
Can’t tell if this application cycle or last application cycle will be more brutal
makes sense given the situation at harvard
how are you determining this? not trying to be snarky im genuinely curious
these are among the schools that have been hit the hardest by drumpf’s bullshit
how necessary are letters anyways
most of my upper division courses were taken under two professors, one died, the other retired
i only have one professor left that ive taken upper div under
i did research with my diff eq prof, but that kicked my ass on top of school, and i think she thinks im lazy now
also, the work i did wasnt good, and didnt make it on the paper, so i dont even have my name on it
im trying to get into a school with a good logic program, but the only ones with actual programs are very competitive
other than that i take my gre in less than two weeks
im hoping i can get in on that, but im not sure
i got a C in matrix theory and upper stats, so its looking rough
ive taken 6 upper division math courses
my gpa is a 3.6, im a double major
i need an honest call, like lets say i do well on the gre, maybe top percentile
what do you guys think my shot is at actually getting into a good grad logic program
ive heard letters and research experience r like most important
then gpa and coursework
even with a double major? like theres no way in hell i can do research on top of constant 20 hour weeks
obviously rough outline but idk, if you wanna get a rough idea of your chances (i guess) u can go to mathematicsgre.com to see what it looks like to get into top programs
cuz some people will post what theyve done and what schools they got into, obvously doesnt show letters of rec or sop but yk
i tried and got a C in matrix theory and stats, because i was too busy learning what the hell a spectra of a diff eq is than studying
🤷♂️
school is hard man
for everyone so
js do ur best on the apps and idk, only apply to schools you would go to but also apply realistically
thats kind of where im stuck, i could get into like my unis grad programs, but i want to do logic, and im looking at like iu blooming at the easiest entry
is it just over for me
i mean try looking at other lower tier schools if your concerned about ur app
surely some lower tier schools have at least one logic prof, thats all you need to be ur advisor lol
but i mean sure shotgun apply to higher tier unis too ofc, reaches are a thing and maybe u get lucky yk
matrix theory - my algebra credit
and stats
i took the other stats and got an A
both grad level
idk ive heard gpa after like 3.5-3.6 dont matter that much
but also at the same time if you look at the people who got into top programs they be having 3.8+ anyways
but that could js be correlation like students who have those kinda gpas have all the other stuff u need too yk
also, i spoke with my professors on campus and they said only the letters and upper divs matter, research isnt too important
but this entire channel says otherwise, so im not really sure what to think
i mean you look at the people who got into the top programs and they typically have at least one REU, or research experience at their uni
right, but top is like harvard etc
ye true
i know im not getting in there
well they have everything there
research signals that your not just talking out of ur ass that you want to do higher math yk
but things like independent readings or taking grad classes can show that too
yk not just doing the bare minimum basically
they wouldnt be more sympathetic with a double major?
i think i would die if i had to do independent readings on top of everything else
and im only partially joking
i mean it will help sure but idk how much yk
i see
like for me i work part time job
could i have done more if i didnt have to work? ye
but it is what it is yk, i did my best
idk use ur sop to leverage ur strengths whatever those are
i think for gre the main thing it does is if u came from no name school it shows ur education was at the level of good schools
so yes that would help but yk gotta leverage ur other stuff
good luck
probably low. Meh gpa and only 6 upper division courses, not much research. Do you have a strong logic background?
nothing other than self-study
id say your odds are not great
especially bc you don't seem to have strong letters to make up for other parts of your app.
idrk what top logic programs are but id say your odds arent great for top 50-40 phd programs.
just my honest opinion based on my experience and people ik
top logic is like harvard
def not getting in there
the most realistic are schools like iu bloomington, and even then im not sure
ive yet to find a school with a lower bar for entry with an actual logic program and a sequence in provability
does anyone know how strongly upward trends are actually considered, my overall is like a 3.5 (between cc and uni) but my first bit at university was relatively rough. I took a fairly long break and have only been getting A's so far. fwiw the classes that I did relatively poorly in were all lower div my upper div math gpa is like 3.85.
You should write convincingly about it in your personal statement
Different schools will look upon trends differently but it's generally a positive
okay word I've been trying to figure out how to weave it in w/o it being like a sob story
or rather without it feeling like im trying to tell a sob story
Emphasize the personal growth
I do think like professionally I have put in a lot of legwork outside of just coming back and doing well in classes, like in the same span of the trajectory I also got a preprint + developed strong bonds w faculty
I think narratively building around that and how it's impacted my ability to take those actions is probably my best bet
^^^ It doesn't have to be a sob story
I am very curious about how positively is a second MS degree seen? Are the applicants supposed to have much more mathematical maturity(when compared to their usual competitors) because they have spent a lot more time than their peers( consider students applying out of their Bachelor's) . Also is age a factor when applying to the more prestigious grad schools?
I'm feeling kind of pessimistic about my chances now. Grades just aren't there and research experience is in a different field. Could have a better chance in e.g. engineering, but IDK. Anyway I'm probably aiming for a research masters as opposed to direct PhD which might help but who knows especially with the current funding environment in the US
It can be good if you're changing fields, or doing it for employment. But largely, getting two MS degrees in mathematics is a waste of time
Also curious, in the "academic culture" of math and adjacent fields are grades or relationshp with profs more important
e.g. if I wanted to go into Physics, then enrolling in a MS degree in physics might be a good idea, especially if an employer will help cover the cost
relationship with profs as ive been told
considering thats what leads to good letters

