#graduate-applications
1 messages · Page 16 of 1
My uni requires two sems of each, plus a sem of complex analysis
my uni requires 9 proof based courses
thats a lie
9 upper division courses
not even proof based
oh but you see we only require one of them www
Well the full list of my uni's undergraduate math major requirements are:
At least 13 courses including
- Either three calculus courses or two proof-based calculus courses
- One course in partial differential equations
- One course in proof-based linear algebra
- Two semesters of analysis and algebra, each
- One semester of complex analysis
my uni doesnt even have an undergrad pde course
and the grad one isnt offered every year
Yeah it seems to be uncommon among schools, my impression is that it's probably just offered to appease the engineering schools because most of the students in it are engineers or physicists, and the problems are just applying the same few techniques over and over again to various PDEs; there's also another undergrad PDE course that's more designed for math majors but I have not yet figured out how the two courses differ (probably just depends on the professor)
damn imagine having a grad program at your school
Yeah I'm glad my uni has a grad program, I learned a lot from grad students and grad-level classes
without grad students i would not be here
they're the basic versions of the classes
all focusing on classical stuff
so it's not as crazy as it sounds
but regardless - my point is that I doubt the US schools are as behind the japanese schools or Chinese schools they would have us believe
It's a list of textbooks that may or may not have been used in a class of yours as far as I understand - bizarre that they require this twice
Well US schools are more prestigious despite being easier
In addition to what hap's stated, a lot of developing countries prefer US doctorates when it comes to faculty selection and policy making
As I've stated earlier, a US doctorate means immunity to a lot of academic garbage that takes place in Pakistan
Thanks a bunch for the kind sentiments
It is what it is, unfortunately
I've been cooped up in my house to avoid getting into any scuffles
Situation's mostly clear now, minus some internet oddities
SDSU and UC Irvine are launching a joint phd program in computational sciences
If I understand correctly, they will be accepting 20 students
Not the case in southeast asia.
Interesting!
Perhaps, only in Phillipines where it only accounts for around 16% of SEA in terms of population.
Indonesia, the biggest country in SEA, does not prefer US graduates.
I can say this with certainty because their new government scholarship policy discourages people to study in the US.
do you have an article or something? Sounds like an interesting read
I only have confindential letters written in Indonesian.
Ah! I see
The tldr is like
They put a strict limit now on how many years you can go abroad to do your PhD.
Unfortunately that would just make pursuing PhD studies in the US impossible.
I see
Unless you can graduate with a PhD in the US in 4 years.
is it on scholarships provided by the state?
It doesnt matter. Even if you get fully funded from a US university, they will kick you out from your home uni if you don't come back after 4 years.
What do you mean by home uni? Place of employment?
Yes. Most Indonesians who go abroad to study PhD are employed by their indonesian uni.
I see
I can't comment on Indonesia specifically since you're certainly much more aware of the situation there
There's similar policies in Pakistan (restriction on years studied, dismissal if PhD exceeds four years), and despite it being the case it is overwhelmingly clear that there's a certain bias to select US doctorates for most academic posts (unless it is political in nature, which is a separate issue)
Ah I see.
Well in the case of Indonesia, the bias doesnt exist.
That is fascinating
would you say this is consistent
or is this more of a new government thing
The bias exists in the university rankings
But even that, it doesnt really matter much because its like
As long as it is within the top 300 according to QS
They dont really care
The bias didnt exist back then as well, but the old government was more lenient with the amount of years you can go abroad and study.
I'll certainly keep an eye on it if more news of it gets public
And back then people actually chose the US not because of prestige
But it was more like they can bring more money if they save US dollars and bring those back to Indonesia.
That's fair
Statistically, you can see that despite being a country with almost 300 million people, its presence in the US is almost negligible.
Compared to Phillipines which is not even half of Indonesia.
Well the philippines was also an american colony for a bit so....
Indeed, which I wouldnt find it surprising for them to put US schools on high pedestals.
Other places that were not US colonies do so as well though
Oh yea, they do.
Math in Pakistan is in an odd spot where you don't see anything interesting or legitimate
there's one professor here who's famous for publishing two papers a day in numerical and fluid (paper mill stuff)
Well.. its probably a way to cheat through the system, I guess?
oh for sure, bunch of absurd policies in higher ed here that made it a huge publishing game
I know one guy landing an alg top paper in the annals that's jobless right now
but eh, jumping into detail on the situation here is a big tangent
Mathematics admissions in the US is tedious in my opinion.
If you apply as an international
That means you need GRE + GRE Subject + English Certificate.
Probably not an expensive amount to pay for high income countries but
I agree - I'm pouring in all my savings into the process right now
thankfully I've gotten a job though
At least in Indonesia that is years of live expenses.
I was looking at the grad school program @ The University of Cambridge. 3.5 GPA minimum
in some cases possibly higher, depending on where you're from
you have to meet their first class standard usually
Yeah I can’t meet them in the middle there 😂 Life is a straight line @ The University of Cambridge apparently
To remove my bias, I question the method they utilized for this grading criteria: https://www.postgraduate.study.cam.ac.uk/apply/before/international-qualifications
If you have international qualifications, get guidance on the requirements for postgraduate study at Cambridge.
which country are you from?
United States
ah
yeah these are tough requirements
I'm applying there with two high 3.9s, and the requirement is at least a 3.8/4.0 for Pakistan
knew a friend who was applying for a 2:1 degree and was rejected despite being well over the threshold
I am genuinely interested in how they determined their metrics. It seems a bit excessive. I could apply to MIT or Carnegie Mellon University domestically.
likewise
I think it's in part due to how the Tripos is structured there
if you check out the curriculum for Part I or II, they seem to be doing nothing but math for all three (four if you count Part III) years
but yeah
it does seem excessive
I was unaware of the tripos system there. Just looked it up. I just pulled up their alumni and people tied to the university. Yeah just Isaac Newton and Charles Darwin
c'mon, don't forget Atiyah
Idk if this is a sad thing to say but that is not a common name here in the states 😂
are you looking at Cambridge for maths or something else
ah
alright, so dumb question
how do you folks refer to a specific textbook within your statement
do you just go by the author? full name of the book? etc.
I don’t understand the framing of the question
Full name and authors
Full name and title of the book I guess idk
do you mention the title of the author or not
or do you just use their name
Just their name
Is this for publishing research?
We have publishing guidelines and formats like that for academic papers
No it’s for graduate school applications, as the channel name suggests
thanks a bunch
Why would you need authors and textbook titles in grad applications
I’m slow oh statement of purpose and purpose statements 
there's also the dreaded textbook list
I’m pretty lucky in my bachelors program. I can choose math in grad school or branch off somewhere else
Afaik from brief research online. It is really just theoretical and applied math that interests me for a doctorates
that's neat - have you thought of any specific fields to get into
I saw pure math and abstract math but that just falls into theoretical no?
wait
To be frank, I'm not sure you're really at a point in your mathematics education to be considering grad apps
theoretical what? math or physics?
My senior year of my undergraduate degree is next year
Math
Well, at least I've never heard the term "theoretical math" used by graduate programs
the traditional division is pure vs applied but if youre applying for grad school you should hopefully have a more specific idea of what youre targeting than that
like algebraic topology or w/e
My major is data science with a minor in psychology. As far as math goes. It all goes from a data science point of view
I totally understand how technical this can get from a mathematical point of view
Well not totally. Theoretically speaking 😂
Totally agree. I’m just planning ahead for foreseeable options
Well my original major was civil engineering. It’s a long story. We should have a channel for these sort of discussions. Could be helpful in the transitions from high school to undergraduate to graduate level studies
It’s been fun need some sleep. Have a great day or good night y’all 👋
yeah I just submitted two textbooks that I used for research
this makes a lot more sense now, why you consider a 3.5 an ok GPA for graduate school if you started off in engineering
you have a unique background and you should leverage that as you apply
but just so you know, the vast majority of us math graduates who go into the top schools (including Cambridge p3) have a very high GPA since it's almost a prerequisite at this point
You don’t have to only apply to top schools. 3.5 is probably fine for a number of very decent schools especially if you’re not international
It also depends where you got that GPA
If you have straight As in your math classes but struggled with some civil engineering classes, then you probably are all of the sudden ok even for some top schools
Generally PhD at cam requires 4 years of undergrad because theres no taught elements
so thats why their gpa thing is high
Would you mind sharing what PhD programs you are applying to?
@mossy niche So there are U of Cam postgrads in here? Whoa. That is a big deal. I guess because of my path in formal education I see math from a different lens but don’t we all? There would be no progress in this field if we all thought the same. I see math from an abstract and concrete lens, theoretical vs applied. It may be based on my experiences throughout life. I am very much a big supporter of this field. It has been my favorite subject since I first learned to count lol
This is why I question U of Cam’s metric and barrier of entry. But after pulling up their history I can see part of it is bureaucracy. This could be a good thing this could be a bad thing. Only time will tell
does anyone know of any type theory/logic PhD programmes in the UK? or other places in europe -- I've been looking at amsterdam and utrecht as well, at least
most of the names my supervisors have given me are retired or aren't taking students this year 
Ask to be added to the logic mailing list if you haven't. Idk who manages it tho
that's one of the 2 I've applied to so far 😭
I emailed one of the group leaders 3 weeks ago, waiting on a reply
I'll probably send another a week before the deadline to make sure it wasn't lost
the programme looks good though
and is closer to home than my current place
You wouldn’t want to study abroad? I kinda wanna check out Portugal. Some unis have dual grad programs tho I’m not sure in the scope of just pure and applied math programs
@cloud sphinx if you find any in the scope of pure and applied math please do tell. Send me an inbox 🙏
It’s because of my major field of study. I study data science. It’s a super broad field
a PhD application for a geometer is very different from that of an analyst
you should at least grab a couple of interests
I know people who are applying for PhDs specifically on classifications of 4-manifolds, and others on cohomology of 2-stacks
the topics can get very specific
Me and Diff were just talking about U of Cam. They have a doctorates program in applied math and theoretical physics. So probably something along those lines. I can niche down the focus from there
you're supposed to write a research proposal before you apply (for UK universities) -- you'd just submit it to the applied math and theoretical physics programme to be considered
I think you'd benefit a lot more from the US in that the doctoral programs there take a ton of folks that have yet to decide a specialization
a doctorate in the UK or most of EU expects you to have studied a masters and come in with a concrete research problem
I'm applying to Cambridge for Part III, not the doctorate
Does Europe and the UK have BS to PhD fast track programs? We have that here or it is offered as an option
some PhDs have a master's rolled in to the first year as a taught year
where you do exams (oral exams, at least at my uni) at the end of the first year and test if you are ready to continue to the rest of the PhD
and you can still apply to PhD programmes with a BSc and no MSc in any case
you'd just have to think about your research proposal more
We have an en-route masters in lieu of your progress in a doctorates program. There are a bunch of options out there
Well I’m not sure for pure and applied math tho
this is the norm for the us
Btw if anybody has questions about PhD in cam dampt you can ask me as long as its not too long of a question (im not a current phd student but I am currently part III, and I'm currently filling out application forms...)
why do you keep saying pure and applied math
For either probably.
Idk Namington told me. #graduate-applications message
I said theoretical and applied math and apparently that is not the distinct line that is drawn in abstract vs concrete math. It’s pure vs applied math
it is pure vs applied
I think the question is why you didn’t just say math
(to which it’s whatever for me)
oh. I’m trying to encapsulate the whole field of math into a formal description of a doctorates degree where I can apply to a university that’s offers the program and do studying and research lol
So far I found U of Cam but the barrier of entry is tough. Anyone know any universities plz ping me 👍
In case anyone else is down this road. There’s Cornell, Columbia, Harvard, MIT iirc (?)
You'll find it difficult to get into any programs if you don't first have an idea of what you would want to specialize in and what you might want to research
You should talk to math professors at your uni whose work you're interested in and ask them for advice
the formal description is math
I actually got lucky. I am doing computational modeling research in the spring. My research professor his background is all math. He is a Harvard and MIT alumn. Got his doctorates in applied math
this is very common among math professors
You should ask him for advice for specific research topics and programs to apply to, he will know your interests better than any of us
Yea he’s like super old mb older peeps. MIT c/o 1975 💀
So he's like 70ish? He'll have good advice. Also ask around for other people in the department's opinions, like his colleagues or any collaborators. It'd also be good to talk to his other students about your situation and see what he has to say.
I don't see what his age has to do with this
Maybe his advice about specific programs will be out-of-date, but his overall advice will still be valuable
I agree. The old timers know a thing or 2
There are plenty of phd programs that are just math and not pure/applied.
PhD research is incredibly specific. To illustrate, a data science-ish example is doing research on the convergence of derivative-free gradient descent methods.
Obviously, one does not need to deeply specialize prior to PhD. However, one needs to at least know a specific area of interest to craft a good personal statement/cover letter/research proposal.
@merry geode I will take this into account. I really appreciate all of the feedback. Especially from the math community
Best of luck 
You too, eh? One of my recommenders is class of '73
Ask him about it
Should definitely have some solid advice
Does Rutgers send emails to you when your recommenders submit their letters?
Most schools do
Idk about Rutgers specifically
Though, not all schools do. EG: neither MIT nor Santa Barbara do (personal experience)
You should still be able to double check the status on the portals
Yep me too
It’s pretty funny how shitty the portal of the Massachusetts institute of technology is
I've gotten two letters in, but I'm having issues with my third one - does not having all three by the deadline result in a desk reject?
doesn't mit list a reason for why they do manual email lor requests
I didn't read it tho since I didn't really care about the reason
there is a bit of leeway for the lor
I know, that's why I asked. Also in the portal there doesn't seem to be a place where you can see the status of the letters
Oh my god I hate MIT
Although, I don't remember having to send in LOR mails on my own. Maybe it's different for the neuroscience PhD portal.
your portal is very different
the math portal is vanilla HTML looking
like early 2000s type
we don't talk about apply web
Got another mail for logic PhD position: We invite applications for a four-year PhD studentship on the Leverhulme-funded project "ECUMENICAL: Proof-theoretic semantics for non-classical and modal logics”, led by Dr. Elaine Pimentel, Prof. David Pym, and Prof. Luiz Carlos Pereira at UCL Computer Science, UK.
tyty
I'm doing intuitionistic and modal logics in my project this year so that sounds great
is it a good idea to mention professors at a university which that im applying to? like mentioning that there research areas align with my interests and stuff like that?
I don't really know how of my personal statement I should spend talking about it
1 sentence
Really? 1 sentence seems really small
I disagree w Cat I wrote a paragraph
So did most other people I’ve talked to
At the bare minimum it signals some effort put into the statement so they can see it’s not purely copy pasted from other apps
And it can contribute possibly also
It also gives the committee some confidence that you won't get there and then realize you don't like anything there and drop out
I mentioned profs by name in a paragraph about why specifically I was interested in that program
i second this
I didn't necessarily say "Person A does this which I'm interested in. Person B does this which I'm interested in" etc
Because I don't know enough about (in my case algebraic combinatorics) to speak intelligently about "hm yes I'm interested in the connections between algebraic combinatorics and Hodge Theory and thus I would like to work with Eric Katz"
I just more or less said "ya these 3 people do algebraic combinatorics in a variety of settings and as such I am interested in attending this university"
Hello I know that this is a really specific question but does somebody know why can't I apply for M1 in the ENS of Lyon? I am in the cadens website and I can't select it and I don't want to enter the second year of master. I am a foreign student
this is the sentence i mean
i dont think you can realistically spend more than a sentence really talking about it unless you really know what you want to do or you really know the university
Ideally you have something different to say for each prof
Eg: shoutout a major theorem they proved
Shoutout some aspect of their work you’d like to learn more about
you can do that, sure. my advisor told me that i should have very little idea of what i want to do and that it is most genuine to just mention a couple of people that i might want to work with, but beyond that its mostly just to list down names of people who the committee might want to ask about your application
aka names that your letter writers know...
fundamentally he also told me to not go overboard on essays because there are much better things in life to worry about, like doing actual math
considering it still took me 3 whole days of editing just to submit all my applications, 1 sentence is already a lot to worry about, and probably a minimum. but if you're able to write more then it will certainly be better
Can you send out an application early and have your letter writers upload their recommendations after your submission?
Is this mostly school dependant or nah?
I’ve been editing on/off for 4 months
So I agree you can definitely go overboard lol
Mostly this is fine
I also wrote a paragraph entailing all 3 professors, around 200 words ish.
that too mostly coz i had a 1k word limit
if not, i would have written a bit more
I'm not sure I understood if you're trying to apply to the Diplôme or not (i.e. auditeur de master)
Do I need to fill out the "relevant coursework" part when applying to UCLA? All this info is already present in my transcript.
Just fill out whatever they want you to fill out. Don't give them an easy way to take away points from your app
Then I'd put the most "advanced" and "relevant" courses there. You can ask them what's up though.
I don't like email exchanges. I wrote down the "big man" courses.
figured it can't hurt
also will need to completely rewrite my sop because ucla wants 500 words max
and will need to bullshit my way through the personal statement because contributing to diversity etc is not really a thing in my country
damn ur applying to PhD at 20?
Fairly normal for US unis, masters and PhDs are kinda rolled into one over there
I mean you might be 21 by the time you finish, but I don’t think being 20 at this point in your final year is all that uncommon? Maybe not the norm but certainly not unheard of
@light tide yeah, I want to apply for the first year of master M1
As auditeur, right?
I'm sorry but what does this mean?
Like there's a difference between applying to the "Diplôme" or just the Master ("hors diplôme" = auditeur)
oh I did not know that but I suppose yes, as an auditeur
So you're saying you can't choose the orange option?
no sorry, not auditeur, I do want the diplome, so I want to choose the first option. I can only choose Master 2 in the orange option
the orange one is the only one I can click
I want Diplome, Niveau M1. When I click the second option I can only select Master 2
I don't see how you can do this unless you somehow have enough background as an UG to actually understand these theorems. Otherwise you're just skimming papers and finding a named theorem which like what's the point
this is how I feel precisely. if you go overboard it might even feel a bit pretentious
thats fine
Wait let me ask some people if it's possible to get into the diplome without redoing an L3
Also are you an EU citizen?
So apparently it should in principle be possible with the last changes
But it may depend on the dept
So I recommend emailing them
(sophie.bonche AT ens-lyon.fr)
same
For my statements I listed the broad areas profs work on and told how i have some problems which would be compatible with their experience and knowledge
I don't wanna say I loved their paper from 2022 on arxiv when I don't understand things done in it outside of the title lmao
thanks!
The thing is that the website does not let me select even L3, so I cannot even redo L3
Yeah idk, these websites are glitchy af so I suggest just emailing them to ask what's going on
Good luck with your application! 💪
thanks! Could I DM for some more questions if you don't mind?
Go ahead
ja cause I started uni at 17
yeah more or less this
well my thought is like (1) I try to understand a little bit more than the title before I write that, but (2) even if I don't: you can study it when they ask to interview you lol
if there's no shot I could understand it at all even with studying then yeah I wont put it
I think it can come across as disingenuous if you name drop things you dont really understand
True, I’m not name dropping stuff I completely don’t understand
At least in the field I’m interested in (low dimensional topology) I can usually get the gist of what people are proving in papers even if the proofs are above my head
Possibly this is just a benefit of my field though
that I can see
i can't understand any of the papers in my field. the only one I have been able to partially understand was because the professor who wrote it visited my uni and explained it to me
Makes sense
Guys I’m sad there’s basically 7 schools I’m guaranteed to not get in to because my subject GRE is too bad
be optimistic bro
(58 percentile. UCLA stats website says on average their accepted students are 80th percentile lol)
focus on what you got
I imagine the others are similar
Dont submit
ig we can say that ur GRE is a "weak" point in ur application
I’m not for non mandatory programs
Yeah tbh I think the rest of my app is quite strong
Which is the saddest part
yeah cool bro like be optimistic
any app has strong/weak points
dw about it 😄
Or dont apply to those places
Ok thats fine then
I guess 16 not counting masters
These 7 are just like “eh whatever I’m rich and maybe I’ll get in”
But I’m still kinda sad abt it because the programs are cool
Youre applying to ucla stats for low dim topology?
The people are doing interesting research
Nah for that app I mentioned other stuff and I didn’t name dropping papers
I mentioned K theory (they have quite a lot of profs in it)
And one guy in low dim top
I am interested in topology vaguely - not hard set on low dim top
I would be happy doing something more algebraic
Low dim top is what I did my research in tho
So if they have people in it it’s what I mention first
thank you for funding our mathematical research 🫡
the normal USA timeline is 18-21 so it's pretty normal?
maybe 22 if your birthday is during the school year
sadly
not normal but not unheard of
most people ik graduate at 22. The vast majority start at 18 and finish at 22.
if you have just one major and are locked in it's pretty easy to graduate fast
you just don't have to
so most ppl dont
I know someone who graduated in two years at 19
the summer holiday is 1/4 of the year after all so on very rough average I think it would be 1/4 of the people who graduate at 21
You said the normal timeline is 18-21…
I'm 20 and applying rn
I'll be 21 soon though
hey guys
I am from Latam
to apply for graduate programs in North America and Europe, you can/should send 2 GRE's subject scores(math and physics)? Or you have to choose one?
are you applying for math or physics
mechanical engineering
I highly doubt they require subject gre for that
No it's 4 year bachelors I am graduating next year
2021-25
Hi everyone, I live in Australia and there's no places that administer the GRE mathematics subject test. All the places I'm applying to say a GRE is optional but I'm wondering if it's truly optional or the other kind of optional where it isn't
Majority of applicants don’t take it now
So even if they liked it they can’t really do anything at this point
Therefore it mostly truly is optional
yea
if you got good grades and some research exp i dont think there is any need to bother with GRE
is this true for international? I would be skeptical
the rule of thumb seems to be in order to get accepted as a international you need good grades research exp good gre good rec letters AND luck.
for math, australian universities are relatively well known compared to the rest of international community
would unis care about pass failing every ge (usa)
I have like 10~15 fucking ge requirements
Most will not care too much
I doubt GRE is that important for anyone
Depends where you’re applying but again, most students even most international students don’t take it
Thus if a university is dead set on only taking gre students they’re limiting their options a lot unless they make it mandatory to apply
That said, you’re right that it’s much harder for international students
(Though as a domestic student, I will selfishly say that’s a good thing)
it's very important to meet whatever cutoff and after that it's not at all important
The context is whether it’s important to submit or not
For optional schools
I said likely not
very true, unless you are applying for a school explicitly saying that the score is strongly recommended (e.g. UT Austin and Maryland) in which case you should treat it as required
but maryland also strongly recommends the normal GRE and I really hope they don't care about it
You uni allows you to pass/fail all of them? That's rather surprising to me, I don't think my uni allows me to pass/fail any requirements
I can only pass fail one per quarter granted
A private uni in the US
my school has around 20 gened requirements none of which are allowed pass fail
I ended up only taking 8 general education requirement courses, due to some double-counting and being exempt from the foreign language requirement
I still take plenty of non-math courses though
I am officially $2000 poorer than last week
18/18 I am finally fucking free
Let’s fucking go
bro...
Damn, 18
Is that typical for math?? I applied to 10 neuroscience schools and that seems like it was on the higher side
I think 10-15 is the typical range
Also, I've asked this before but I can submit my application before my LOR writers submit right?
European Masters?
On every site I've been to, yes
The school probably has a little FAQ about it
15 for math is a pretty normal number
i know someone who applied to 80
WHAT
That gotta be cap
ainnoway any letter writer accepted the task of submitting to 80 different places
For post docs, the numbers are higher as well
Postdoc and faculty is different
I think applying to dozens of schools for faculty positions is the norm
Maybe I should just quit now, that sounds exhausting
there is some application where you can ask for a letter to be uploaded to this platform, and then you can use that as your letter of rec
out of all my schools I recall there was only one school that explicitly said you could use this method
Ridiculous waste of money
so basically the letter writers only did the process once
Lol do you know how many they got accepted in? Like what's the point, you can only go to one school anyways
There arent 80 schools id want to go to
they went down the top schools from 20 to 100 and got accepted to the 50th
Lmfao
btw this is a current postdoc at my school who didn't have the greatest undergrad experience
That's crazy lol I can't imagine going down a list like that
I'm glad they did, since they're an awesome professor
that's also essentially what my advisor told me to do for 1-20 lmao
Youre saying they only got into one school.
idk what schools they got into
Thats not comparable
i feel like the probabilities to get into a school might be comparable. at one point the undergrad GPA was low 1.Xs
For anyone wondering, it's called Interfolio, and I think it's from ElSevier
mathjobs.org also allows you to upload once, and apply to many
Mostly European that I saw
Like 1.5/4.0? idk how that happens
usually people with such gpas are put on academic probation and then kicked out
actually, my prof got kicked out then got a second chance later on
the problem is not the well known of your school - pretty sure there are much more well known schools in europe and england. the problem is if you are an international student you are "more expensive" for the school (the tuition they cover etc is higher)
relatedly, I learned that this year the comp bio programs at stanford and mit are rejecting international applicants regardless of qualification
and this is true for other "small" departments also, but idk if it is true for math
cus of govt not giving money for internationals or smthn?
I don't know. The exact statement passed to me is "smaller programs this year at stanford and mit are losing grants and thus will be rejecting intl applicants regardless of qualification"
visas fees etc are expensive for the universities
ah
took an intro cs class which was required for my math major and seriouslt fucked up and missed the final exam today and thought it was next week, so i will fail the class presumably unless it's somehow possible to take it later. this is a non-math class but is this going to screw up my chances of grad school
Cs has higher chances than other things to be harmful but it should still probably be fine
Especially if you’re not doing applied math
well, on the not so negative side, you now have something legitimate to put in the external circumstance box and how you learned from the experience
i thought it was thursday not wednesday so i didnt actually miss the exam im fine
Why are you talking about APs
Sorry for the late reply but I'm applying to a couple of programs in the Midwest so Purdue, Wisconsin and Madison. I have a few typical reaches where I don't really expect to get in. I'm applying to a few 'lower' ranked schools like Tennessee, North Carolina State and Emory
Who doesn’t love a double fuck up that works out in the end lol
this is why i should still pay attention to the easy classes because if i dont im gonna actually fuck up next time and miss the final
purdue and madison are very strong in analysis!
I have kind of a conundrum as to who to ask for my PhD references. I already have one out of two I need.
The choices are, essentially:
a) Lecturer very well-respected in my field, but low contact with him apart from 1 quarter-semester module despite actively trying to work with him on an internship multiple times.
b) Lecturer in pure maths but different field, 2 quarter-semester modules over the last academic year. Probably the main reason I had gone through higher level analysis unscathed.
c) Lecturer, pure maths, related field but not the exact same thing. 3 quarter-semester modules total including a module I'm doing right now. Great guy, but extremely disorganised.
d) The supervisor of my summer internship last year. Very much related field, generally very well organised person, but I have been very bad at keeping in contact since, on top of overpromising and underdelivering a decent bit.
My main ideas are b) and c) as of now?
This is not for this year right
Depending on where you apply, you may need 3 references
I'm applying to the UK, places there tend to need 2 references, and those usually being explicitly academic
Ok then b and c
Thing is, b) or c), because I already have one letter from my masters project supervisor.
Yeaaaa I was thinking of doing this
Kind of unfortunate that I am super busy with exams rn and the deadlines for stuff are waaay too soon
But it should be doable
Yes the UK classic of all your deadlines for applications being in the middle of exam season, so they don’t have any results to base their decision on and you have no time to write a good application
I’m really glad I can’t afford to apply here because just wtf actually is that about, very silly
I mean, I am applying with grades from over a semester's worth of masters level modules, I think that counts for a lot
Even if the current results aren't included, it counts for a decent bit
The main problem for me is that the most likely source of funding has application deadlines around uhhh
End of next week.
Everything else is much later
its the same in the us unless your school ends particularly early
Does your uni show the grades of courses you’ve not sat the exam for yet? My exams aren’t even until next week
I’m mainly looking at Europe and the deadlines are a bit later which is nice
Yeah I mean that’s why I was asking mine are all 80-100% so it just kinda feels weird sending off apps now
Mine doesn't
Only grades for first three years of classes
Yeah no same here, I just think it’s a bit odd with masters applications in the UK because it means they’re largely judging you on a single years work (only honours, final 2 years, counts towards your degree classification) and you’ve not done your project yet
The deadlines in Europe are all a bit later so you should at least have sem 1 results
guys i will apply for a phd in about a year or two from now, any pointers on what i should do, i am currently working to get some money and doing research on the side with a professor on Deep Learning algorithms, for my phd i would like to work in computational complexity theory, any universities that i should look out for? any advice would be helpful. Thanks in advance
In general how many people make the decision whether to accept or reject your application? For those who have gotten their graduate applications accepted
Yo. Sounds like we have similar interests. Where are you based out of
what do you mean when you say based out of ?
This is not known to applicants
I've heard that at some places masters admissions are through an entire different process compared to PhD admissions? Wherein that your application isn't reviewed by a committee but by someone akin to an admissions officer
Is that true for Math/CS research based masters programs? If so that's a bit worrying
Masters admissions vary a lot more
I was talking to a professor and he made that distinction clear when I was talking about masters opportunities
I understand that's clear obv but it's not a committee then in this case
Which makes sense ig since masters students aren't necessarily offered funding so offers don't have to be as rigorous
Some places do research masters admissions in the same way as phd admissions though
Man, I really don't want to do a masters to compensate for my lacklustre undergrad exp😭
My institution, a large US research institution, for example
My main worry is that I won't end up getting an offer for funding whether it be through a TA'ship or not which kind of sucks
ig it would be a conflict of interest if your LOR writer is part of the admissions committee right? (if I'm applying to my undergrad institution for grad)
They will recuse themselves
This varies by institution
Yep. I found a few institutions which offer some guarantee for students like Florida and Wake Forest. Not much more than those places
Michigan has a funded research masters which can transition into the phd program
I don't meet the requirements (not first gen etc.)

I should probably study for my midterm that's in an hour rather than worrying about research programs
😅
Where do you live 😂
I may apply for a joint PhD next year. It depends how the year goes
1: take grad classes
2: see if you can find an REU to do for a summer (research exp + rec letter)
3: closer to when you want to apply talk to profs at your university who do computational complexity theory for recs of schools to apply to
to find schools you can also look at the affiliations of authors of complexity papers you think look interesting published in STOC, FOCS, CCC and maybe some other tcs conferences like approx/random, itcs.
Hi! Does anyone have any advice for uploading a writing sample to a graduate program? Up until a few hours ago, I had no idea what that was, and the prompt was given without a description. After some digging on the internet, I found that its probably related to academic writing/research one may have done. I have done an REU and helped co-author a paper which is now under review for publication. This is the only real evidence I have for mathematical writing, other than my own personal LaTeX notes and homework. Any helpful input would be appreciated :)
you can upload it ig, or maybe the sections or chapters you wrote (assuming your REU advisor would allow you to do so)
If I have an opportunity to ask some questions to a lab member of a potential advisor, what would be good questions aside from technical ones?
how often they meet with their advisor, what the advising environment is like
👍
i can do the first two but the problem is the third one, there isnt a professor who does complexity theory at my uni...
Do what jek said then
No one who does CS theory or anything related at all? Either in CS department or math department?
is it good form to email potential phd supervisors before you apply?
Do you have specific questions for them?
in the us
i have a general idea of what their projects are from reading their papers
my impression is that if you email
you'll get one of two responses
1: no response
2: "damn that's crazy. you should apply"
as such I don't see a point in emailing
what about for a 4/5 month research internship as a Master's student?
considering an internship in the US as a European
is there still an application process, or can you just send a mail and talk with them -> internship agreement and that is that?
No idea, never applied for those
Lmao this is true even for most profs in the UK as well
But in all places I think it's good to make sure that the prof u wanna work with at least is open to taking students, and not idk retiring or leaving any time soon
Sometimes they say something about your background and tell yoj that they will alert the committee after you apply (this is good because I hear that most applications aren't being read carefully at most schools)
Some encourage you to apply and express the possibility of mentoring you
well yea, but that's different than hundreds of applicants saying please let me in during application cycle 
Yeah, from my exp out of all 6 people I've contacted, only 1 I had a mini chat with, others either ghosted me or just told me to apply lol, so that's why I said most
Stupid question, but how exactly should I write a cover letter?
It should be roughly one page long if not slightly less, first paragraph should clearly state who you are (e.g. a major in mathematics) and the purpose of the latter (e.g. applying to a graduate program). Then the following paragraphs should briefly explain your motivations, how they fit with the school/department/employer/etc.'s interests and some concrete accomplishments supporting your fit for the role
a statement of purpose is a slightly different but related kind of document, here's a possible structure for one https://writeivy.com/statement-of-purpose-for-phd-admission-a-universal-formula/
(among the search results for that kinda thing; there's lots of resources and sample letters online)
fundamentally a cover letter should answer the question "why is Eduardo León fit for this role", clearly and concisely while based on facts (= your accomplishments, current goals and interests and those of the institution you're applying to)
there are no stupid questions, by the way 
Thanks!
How important are gpa and course difficulty in grad app?
They are important
how many are good enough/impressive
because i think normally students complete undergrad with all upperdivision finished right
and they take algebra/analysis in junior year
so there isnt like time to take grad courses
Tbh, I think most of the students competitive for top PhD positions probably took these as <= sophomores
Not that you had to have done so to be competitive
But probably most of the competitive ones have done so
I think taking algebra/analysis sophomore year isn't too suprising
dang thats fast
imagine someone taking these as freshman year
thats kinda insane tbh
what about extracurriculars
as compared to undergrad app
There is a current freshman who im friends with carrying my ass in all 3 of my grad classes
He’s actually in a 4th also
so he took algebra and analysis before college?
Yes
Dual enrollment
He’s on this server so Serkan if you’re reading this check the ego buddy
Don’t get a big head
I know someone who took graduate algebra in HS through dual enrollment
Dual enrollment kids get an unreal boost ngl
I so wish we had this here
same
Is there a significant difference between auditing a class versus taking it for a grade admissions wise?
Yes
shoot, need to consider whether I should underload or not then
if you audit a course it will not appear on the transcript
Are you considering this for your last sem? It really doesn't matter lol
your 8th sem courses are not gonna change anything about your application
if you can save money underloading, may be worth it
Does anyone know whether caltech's low-dimensional geometry and topology department is strong?
this is mainly true for schools where this is a precedent (berkeley and the very top schools)
i didnt take algebra my sophomore year because of a schedule conflict, but no one in my year took analysis and algebra in sophomore year
berkeley is a very top school lol
Yeah tbh I do wonder how much of a bubble my experiences are
oh
So fair
you mean for ugrad
Yeah
then yeah its not as good as the top few
:(
actually, in all the grad school panels at my school, it was repeatedly emphasized that to be very competitive you need to take the honors undergrad analysis and algebra sequence, and get all As, and anything else is merely a bonus
i mean
that is partly because other schools select for math preparation
in ug admissions
its not really about wealth tbh
Sorry I will refrain from SchoolSpiritPosting
yes
that is not enough though
but yes that is the bare minimum
for the very top schools it is a bare minimum
it is not enough
for the very top
not even close
you need to learn topology and geometry
or have a very strong research interest and coursework and/or research to back it up
if your application literally just conveys you took 4 courses
then like
good luck lol
do you go to harvard or something
i cant imagine why a school would tell their students this
unless they had a ridiculously overinflated view of their ug curriculum
no
t10 private
but not t5?
Bruh this is such a high school ass conversation
Do you not have a little bit of shame to utter the sentence “but not t5?”
Like that’s so sad
Lol

i dont give a shit about rankings
but it does matter and anyone who says otherwise is naive or lying
its easy to feel like youre above it when you're at one of the top schools e.g. berkeley
the point is like
prestige is correlated with the status of the professors
and the past outcomes of the students
from the pov of the admissions committee, if they see an applicant from harvard who took 2 semesters of honors analysis/algebra vs. the same from an unknown school
both with As
I mean I guess I would say
they have a much easier time of gauging what that actually means for the harvard studnet
I agree that 4 classes only is not enough for an app
because theyve seen hundreds of harvard applications before and admitted many of those students and seen their outcomes
and similarly for rec letters
if the writer is famous then it makes it more likely the adcom has a feeling for what the letter actually means
It doesn’t matter if you’re doing 4 classes only it’s not enough at any school pretty much
yes obviously
And then once apps start getting a lot of other factors
Then the school ranking matters a lot less than your individual situation
Sure it helps, but many small schools have very big name professors
yes the ranking is irrelevant if you can build a good application
the point is just
you need to recognize that this is a reality
and find ways to shape your application accordingly
like doing the bare minimum will never work, because someone can do the bare minimum at princeton and therefore have a strictly stronger application than yours---not because princeton is inherently better, but because the adcom has a better sense of what the bare minimum actually means at princeton
the reason i asked about rankings is because
i think at the very top ugrad institutions, there is a bit of a sense that they are above this
even at the level of the faculty
like i think harvard students/profs have an insanely overinflated view of math 55
so i can imagine profs at a small handful of schools deluding themselves into thinking that their students genuinely only need to take 4 courses to get in anywhere
i got a lot of shitty advice from profs in ugrad
many of them have no idea how admissions works
except perhaps at their own school
also math phd programs have gotten orders of magnitude more competitive in the last 10 years
so they also may just not know what it's like nowadays
I am but I'm also considering the fact that I probably will be reapplying if I have to take a gap year
the other reason ranking matters is because it correlates with the strength of your peers, but that is not something most high schoolers can understand or think of
|| Karthek is teaching Mixed Integer Programming and I really want to take it and not audit😭 ||
that'll be a good class, I say take it
|| My class choices as of now are potentially 500 with Dunfield (de GOAT) and a special topics with Jeff. So I have to optimize accordingly if I want to underload||
maybe in terms of number of applicants, not in quality from my experience
where are you
Sweden
lol
in the us i think it is a lot different
actually i am sure it is a lot different
not from what i have heard from colleagues. but sure, might be different in different fields and places
in top institutions
like the very top few
i think it would be unheard of for someone to be admitted
without taking many graduate courses
or equivalent level of independent study work if they went to a liberal arts school or smth
at minimum
because enough people are doing this so as to completely saturate the number of slots available at the top few programs
the other way is to have an extremely strong research portfolio
which is like virtually impossible for undergrads
so i think the vast majority get admitted off of coursework and rec letters alone
if only because most schools just dont have a deep enough course catalogue for undergrad math
Say 50 people apply to a spot, then at most two are viable applicants. Those two are viable at many places. Low accepance rates mean nothing. You can not imagine how many pointless applications that are submitted.
i didnt say anything about low acceptance rates
i said the standards for admission
are effectively higher
[cn]
ok lol
my source is i attend a top 5 phd program
and know people at all the others
and have talked to many many students and professors about this
and applied for grad school a lot more recently than you
I was in my first admission committe in 2008 so I have seen a few applications
in sweden lol
and in us and in europe
ok where in the us
also 2008 is too long ago
the competition ramped up in the ~5 years after the 2008 financial crisis
from what I understand 50 is like 10x or 20x underestimate
because the govt gave money for sciences
of US PhD positions
and then it dried up
that was just a number
it was like 2 orders of magnitude off
whatever you do you, good luck
i did me
im trying to paint a realistic picture for those who are still navigating this
the situation is a lot different outside of the top 20ish schools which i would guess is where your experience/second-hand information is coming from
but that was not the discussion topic
and relying on rankings... have you ever been part of doing those. it is a joke (eg QS)
not literal rankings
but there is a general agreement about what the top few schools are
How difficult do you find the graduate course track at Berkeley? @pearl isle One of the professors I know is Berkeley alum and mentioned how the courses themselves weren't particularly difficult. It could be a bit biased since he's a control theorist and may have taken more engineering courses but he elaborated on how grad students there are effectively focused on research only and it's not as course centric
i think you are taking the most uncharitable possible reading of what i wrote
and ignoring the several places where i explained the role of “prestige” in admissions
nobody is “relying” on rankings
I’ve only taken 3 (and I’m taking them this semester) and 2 are extremely hard, 1 is a free A bc the professor doesn’t want to grade anything
For context, the algebraic topology class I’m taking right now is the first level algebraic topology class, and is covering:
fundamental group, covering spaces, higher homotopy groups, fibrations, stable homotopy groups, singular/simplicial homology, cohomology rings, classification of principle g bundles, Morse inequalities, obstruction theory, characteristic classes
In the first fucking semester
Actually it’s pissing me off the class is hard to the point of being genuinely unfair
The graduate courses vary a lot in difficulty based on the instructor
Another class I’m taking is doing standard differential topology material but just like very fast & very very long homework’s. But I would say that one is fair at least just a frustrating amount of homework
right the assumption is often that the grad students have seen things like that
because they select for that in admissions
which ofc makes things brutal for undergrads
I’ve seen a lot of that already
And despite that
It was still ridiculously hard
Is
I haven’t finished the final yet
yeah i dont mean they did a good job calibrating the difficulty lol
Gotta speed learn characteristic classes
Idk this is just like Russian guy
Kinda my own fault for taking a grad class with a Russian
Givental?
Like I probably shouldn’t say something like that but it’s true
no that is wrong
the problem is their standards are informed by their soviet education
At any rate, the applied math grad courses at berkeley are all pretty reasonable
where students were selected from like age 10 to do math
Yeah despite that this guy is just genuinely bad at teaching
He doesn’t remember his own proofs, his board work is terrible, his explanation of everything is just really shitty pictures
And I like proof by picture normally!
being good at math has no correlation with being good at teaching
It's giving wodzicki
Fun Wodzicki lore he is a polish count
Anyway most of the profs I’ve had at Berkeley have been great tbf
I did the funny thing where you convince yourself that the infamously bad professor is just hard not bad
And it turns out he’s actually just bad
Which is like mostly my own ego fault
i think thats the correct ballpark
the number i saw most often was 400
yeah
that would check out with my institution then
i recall brown saying they have 15 acceptances for 400 applications
oh thats what you mean
then yeah
I'm talking about the increase from 2023-2024 to 2024-2025
It's a jump of 1500 applications for Natural Sciences (PhD)
The reason it’s so many is bc of international students
Master's admit rates are even worse
I'm not getting into MS CS at Princeton💀
Dude before I get admitted I swear my views on immigration are harsher than Trump’s
After I get admitted then I’ll go back to being pro immigrant
That's a crazy opinion
Please accept my application Bernard Chazelle🫶
green portals 
It's too blackpilling. My GPA is already fricked so I stopped caring to check
Math gre has famously never helped anyone
There's something oddly fascinating about seeing the mathgre site
what site is that?
The less you know the better
it's like 4chan but for grad apps
no
not quite, it's not healthy to partake in that site admittedly
somehow it feels like >>50% phd students are intl though, they must just get funding elsewhere
The 30000£ tuition fees are not very encouraging if you plan to self fund :D
I Studied for the math gre this term and it definitely was self harm 😭 and I got a 690 and wanted to do better 😭
It’s still good :motivation emoji: don’t feel to bad about it
i just dont wanna take it again 😭
I'm going to take it next April in case I have to apply during the next cycle💀
Ik right me too 😭
I got a 720 and then took it again and got a 710 lmfao
It’s a hard test
You have to study for it a lot and I just didn’t have time
Ufff doesn’t sound nice
I ll keep doing motivic homotopy instead
Then it ll work for sure🙂
that test is only good at identifying innate mathematical problem solving talent under time pressure, so studying a lot for it might only improve your score a little. studying too much is worthless anyways
i didnt know it even existed till a month before the test date, and im currently in analysis and dont have to take complex analysis or topology for my school and and dont remember the calc and had a terrible calc 3 prof
then how do we improve at it?
i did a lot of research and i think the consensus is that it doesnt really test for anything important tbh
the first 40 questions i can do pretty easily
it was the ones after that that were like nooooo
luckily the complex analysis questions are always very similar
but i feel like not taking complex or topology is shooting yourself in the foot for graduate admissions, if you're thinking of applying
if you can do the first 40 questions pretty easily then you should be easily breaking 80 percentile
i only sorta agree - I think it's worth doing at least a month or so of studying
especially if you've forgotten stuff
like I had
It could be worse. I studied and got a 550. There are a lot of test optional schools (unless you are trying to go to a top program)
Well on the old practice tests I was getting over 40 right and on the scales score I was getting like 700s with percentile like 75% and then on the actual test I got a 690 which was 52% and I’m normally a good test taker 😭
I was like non stop studying but I think I overworked myself and then I was so tired by the test. Plus I ran out of one of my medicines and had a 2 week headache because of it 😭
Eh I’m not trying to I don’t like the competition
I’m applying to cuny grad center, nyu and Rutgers
I live in the New York area
We have April to improve 😭
i was more meaning 40 on the current exam
i could only do half the exam myself
the exam is getting harder, and since less people are taking it, usually the people who are still taking it tend to be higher percentile leaning since they have prepared. as the exam is no longer required, the skill will rise across the board so it means higher difficulty to get a good percentile
oh, Rutgers is really good
What are you applying there for?
I did the 2 practice tests of the current exams they released. I didn’t do any tests before they changed it in like the 90s or whatever
Idk yet
I just wanna learn more math
I would do a masters program but I have no way to get it funded
I think I have a good chance getting in the cuny grad center tho bc I go to cuny and know some professor who work there
Some places fund masters, especially if it’s the highest degree they offer
i still think those are easier than the actual exam
They have a lot of different areas of specialty at the grad center
I'm a horrid test taker so that has also to do with it
Booo but those are the tests they posted 😭 and they only have like 3 which is crazy
cuny is good but they require both GRE scores
They post one like every 10 years
Yea I took the regular one that was easy
I mean the English was hard af but I don’t think they care that much
I scored much better in the practice too, but they also came from prep books published prior to 2020
that's actually the score that matters more for math phd
Vocab flash cards helped me a lot. I’ve heard most schools don’t care much about verbal
most schools don't care about the general GRE in general
Is a 160 good?
if you submit it they usually care about a good English score because their assumption is everyone gets a good quant score
😞
i have no clue
i never took it but the multiple grad panels I attended emphasized this about the general gre
I am a first gen college student and I literally know nothing lol
Like I didn’t even know these tests existed
Like u said Rutgers was good and I’m like oop I just heard it existed a month ago 😭
If I don’t get into grad school I’m gonna apply for the cuny pipeline program to help me out
The entire process is complicated. Figuring out even basic things like what tier of school you should be applying to is more difficult than I expected
it can be difficult to navigate
I don’t even know the tiers 😭
There's a few tiers people could be referring to, but it's usually like Top N in some university ranking websites, or this tier system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_research_universities_in_the_United_States
Its not black and white. The specific subfield of math you’re interested in matters.
Even then it’s not obvious. How do you compare schools with one very good faculty member in your area to a school with 3 good faculty in your area.
Most people have a rough idea.
What if I don’t know yet 😭
Usually if you don't know what type of math you like, it's recommended that you go to a large institution
Oh all the ones I applied to is r1 I guess that is good
Well good 😊
@inner grove did you have to take the gre when you applied to phd programs? i know you already had a masters when you were applying
I am applying to UCB gradschool and the application page is asking for a SoP and a personal history. I am not sure what to write in the personal history. It's asking for personal struggles, issues on racial or gender inequality, and stuff like that
The problem is I am a middle class Asian male, and these characteristics are overrepresented in STEM. I have nothing to write that doesn't seem overdramatic and maudlin.
I agree (and have heard myself) not to write about struggles you don't have
from what I understand - those lists there are just suggestions, at least for berkeley's statement
the prompt of the personal statement itself
is just to describe some formative experiences that have created your interest in math
some suggestions: show off your passion. Talk about times you've independently studied math on your own, talk about work you've done to share that passion with others (volunteering?) - make the committee see you basically nerding out about math
if you do this be careful not to do the thing everyone does "when I was 5 I liked numbers". More recent = better, they honestly don't care about you when you were five
alternatively, you can talk about how you used your situation to help others. EG: as a privileged white male, I talked about my extensive teaching history
I talked about my teaching philosophy and gave specific examples
I didn't frame it explicitly as "using my privilege to help others"
bc that just is hard to make it sound good
but that is a place to put stuff like that
Wow those are great suggestions. I'm just gonna do a mix of those. Thanks!
np!
I think pretty much everyone has something in their background that makes them "nonstandard"
I agree, I would imagine they also want something that gives them an idea of the type of person you will be upon attending the school. Will you be a hermit that doesn't talk to anyone?
Yep. Though secretly I agree with Andrew
I don’t really think Math professors are on average the type of professor to give a shit about diversity statements
Maybe Berkeley professors specifically do
But in general I think it probably isn’t getting read lol
I mean there’s a lot of old fashioned math professors
And non American ones
No not really
I would say that like a lot of the old farts on admissions committees aren’t bigoted but also aren’t progressive enough to like things like diversity statements
That’s kinda vibes based though
The other thing is tbh, once you start doing grad level math the diversity statistics are pretty bad lmfao - so it’s like while it can probably help you, you honestly don’t have that much competition who has better diversity statements than you even if your statement isn’t that good
It’s like if everyone is either a rich domestic white male or a rich international student no one’s diversity statement is very good so it’s not gonna hurt you too much if yours isn’t either
No idea actually
Probably most of the top places are trying to promote diversity
I don’t think white males per se
But also rich international students
I guess you can count them as diverse if you want lol
No one is looking at your parents income sheets
No idea
I also didn’t mention it on any of my apps
I’m a poor first gen female student 😂 so my diversity statement is gonna knock socks off
Nice
Doesn’t surprise me at all
That’s also Yale….
How late (after the deadline) do programs accept LOR's from professors?
I'll be submitting my apps due on the 15th soon enough but I think one the letters will be sent a few days after the deadline
They should not be too late
yeah the exact deadline can vary from place to place
but it's usually a few days after your application is submitted
Got it. The professor mentioned they're going to get them sent before Christmas but I'm hoping they're able to get them done earlier by the 19th/20th latest
is the ddl of recommendation letter which the letter provider received the same as the application ddl ?
i've been lurking this channel for a bit but now that i'm in my third year i think it's worth asking: what would be my best course of action to be grad school viable?
- very high GPA, double majoring in appmath + piano; relevant bc this severely constrains my course options
- coursework besides irrelevant lower divs like calculus, computational linalg (we didn't even get past diagonalization 😭): basic discrete math for CS, combinatorics, elementary NT (no abs alg), probability theory, mathematical stats (ie a theoretical approach rather than purely computational), real analysis I (ch1-4 of rudin)
- planning to take real analysis II (a few more chapters of rudin?), numerical methods, + abs alg or ML
- no relevant research experience
- don't really have a good handle yet on what my specific research interests would be
- extensive experience writing problems for high school level math contest (difficulty comparable to AMC 10/12)
sry if this is overly generic/insufficiently detailed but any advice would be appreciated, many thanks in advance
Do you want to do applied or pure
I would say if applied: try to get in a lab somewhere, do some coding projects & take coding classes
If pure: take as many upper div & graduate classes as you can
Apply for REUs this summer
Actually you should do that whether you’re pure or applied
I have just started ny final year of UG. Can I still apply for grad?
Like there are international scholarship in Italy
You have 4 days for this app cycle at some places
Some places deadlines have passed and a few you have 2 days
Can you apply - if you already have letters, possibly
But the timing is very tight
some places have deadlines in january so those are possible
europe deadlines would come in pretty late
US is probably not possible now (especially the top programs), many deadlines have passed or would pass on the 15th.
check with each program
some would have same deadline, some would give 1-2 week of wiggle room
what's the difference between a princeton senior thesis and a uk/commonwealth honours year thesis
Well the deadline for me is upto june 2025
(it shows 25 june 2025)
If you are applying to EU, I'm not sure about countries other than the UK, but you may want to look at the funding deadlines
Someone said they got admitted into Texas A&M two years ago even though they didn't submit a mgre. Do y'all think it's worth a shot if I also don't have it? The program would be a good fit for me...
UK deadlines are usually between the end of the month and the middle of January and European deadlines are typically a bit later around like April or may so if you want to stay in Europe you definitely can
I think I’m probably applying in the April batch now so I can get my semester 1 results back and maybe submit my UG thesis too
https://scholarshiproar.com/italian-government-scholarships/?amp
In particular i am talking about this. They are offering 900 eru per month as well
Funding might have passed, I had to apply for a scholarship in Berlin by like 2 weeks ago
Oh I see, I am checking this scholarship as well (sent the link above).
Their normal application deadline is like April but for funding it was early December, so you might need to be careful of that
My UG will complete like in November or December
