#graduate-applications
1 messages · Page 8 of 1
Nobody wants to talk about that because it breeds nothing but toxicity. This channel is now basically only breeding toxicity
idk man i think its just the way people are not cool
For some reason I don’t understand people are obsessed with stressing themselves out getting as much information about what schools are doing X and who is going to Y and blah blah when it’s past the point when you can do anything
im sure if u were to have a disussion with one of your mates on the topic it would be different
or anyone
seems normal man its like when ur out of a test and ur trying to review ur answers
like its just normal to stress about just like stressing about ur grades
its just natural
When this channel was being used before applications were due it served a functional purpose to help people unfamiliar with the process but now it’s just people arguing about how little or how much any particular thing affects your graduate application
Realistically this channel should probably be locked until admissions are over
if ur reviewing your answers u can do something about it
back in the good ole days one of the profs here did a masters in a random state school and got into columbia
Maybe till like till June or something
undergrad wasn't related to math at all
yea john the logic is correct we all know that its bad to think about something u cant change but i am saaying its NATURAL
Except this makes you stressed for 1 hour, this process drags out for months
now lol
yeah i dont disagree, maybe the existence of this channel is encouraging ppl to stress out more
we all do it
idk i dont really care about what the server decides. Ill keep answering stuff like when ppl ask about schools for operator algebras or w/e if this channel does survive
if people were just more chill it will survive
instead of trying to be online judges
of wether one deserves or not
the fuck lmao
Highly off topic what is operator algebras I saw it when I was looking at stuff at TAMU
Remember chm how I repeatedly recommended we lock it by now lmao
No, lmfao
i can tell u in #advanced-analysis
I'm sure the channel would be a lot nicer if not for the people who just show up to pile hate on it ...
,,,sowwy
On that issue, there's nothing in the rules about why mgre forums is toxic. It just is and we're supposed to accept the dogma.

ig the chancing paragraph would probably contain it
i just enjoy reading this channel and seeing what people have to say
It’s almost like some people have seen firsthand over multiple years what happens when you gather a lot of people applying to grad school at the same time who are constantly checking such places
makes more sense
We should have 2 channels then, 1 about how to apply and another about the nature of applications and decisions. The problem is many of us are past how to apply, that's simple stuff so all that remains is conversations like these.
Answer: it becomes insanely toxic and everyone is depressed and stressed
but by the way people talk i’d think they serve on the admissions committees
exactly
this is the main problem
everyone just thinks he or she knows everything
instead of just being uplifting they try to like evaluate lmfao
We don’t even want to have people talking about results for the most part. Do that on your own if you want, but it just spirals out of control incredibly fast
is it regular to receive emails from professors and a school without being accepted yet
I got quite a few, in my cases I think it meant I passed an initial round and they wanted to talk and mainly just ask me like what I want to study, with who, and how likely I’d be to accept an offer. Then they let me ask questions about the program
okay that was basically what went on, asked ab research interest and future plans ect
they didn’t ask who else i had applied to or if i was likely to accept an offer or not though
¯_(ツ)_/¯
fwiw I think you hit the nail on the head throughout 👍
"toxic positivity" requires toxicity, that is to say a downside to the positivity
My initial comment was targeted to the specific circumstance of someone who had already sent out applications, and all that was left was not driving themselves crazy
"it's a bunch of somewhat correlated coin flips and you'll probably get in somewhere" is good advice in the specific circumstance of a qualified candidate awaiting responses.
And if someone applied to Harvard, Princeton, UCLA, etc then they're probably a qualified candidate
Could be they're just overconfident, but that is irrelevant at this point since applications are in
what do you guys think of putnam
ie is scoring a say a double digit score would be a good thing to shoot for to add to one's application?
No harm in adding it, I doubt it is too useful though
would it be if one is not even a math major
Having a good score can help. idk what the threshold is though. idk if having double digits is worth mentioning.
For the most part it would just show your 'smart' not that you necessarily know a lot of math.
I think you want to be at least top 500 for it to matter
double digits isn't good enough
yea ig there are too many smart people but i just thought of it as a way to show any aptitude for problem solving really
as im not even a math majro and i have nothing to prove that i indeed know the basic math other than rec letters
Who does it hurt by adding it?
theres some cases where i think it might be harmful
for example, I got a higher score my first time than later tries (bc i stopped caring about comp math right)
so i only mentioned my first score
i think mentioning my second score might have been more harmful
in any case these are like
very very small + or - afaik
In general there's such a thing as damning by faint praise, and it is natural to worry whether you'd be doing to that yourself, if you don't have a strong sense of how impressive the achievement you're looking at is or isn't.
For context, any score above 20 (two questions completely correct) typically gets one into the top 500, so that's a good baseline to aim for
is it ok/normal having done a master in europe and looking to do part III ?
if u do the exercises
then its more effective lmao
if u dont then its worthless
ig with the course u have the prof where like u can have discussions and so on
but even if it wouldnt really amtter much u can just ask here
almost all good students study ahead
most of the time yea but i meant questions as in "intuitional" questions
not actual problems
but yea
it's kinda pointless if ur going to take these courses anyway?
well yea
it is
or not pointless but
if its free time then its good cuz ur goign to be much more prepared when actually taking the course
- the main thing of anything is actually to have fun
so if its fun for you then its a win-win
then do that , 100% your grades and understanding will improve
cuz also if not for the contents
if u read hard books
ur increasing you "mathematical maturity"
if that makes sense
congrats
dont you have the final tho?
how much is your final worth if i m ya ask
may*
cool!
that shouldn't be a problem
do you know how many courses do students take per term and how many will be examined on if we do a thesis?
Depends - if you want a distinction you should take between 17 and 19 "units" to exam, where an essay (not a thesis) counts as 3 units, and other courses are either 2 units (16 lectures) or 3 units (24 lectures)
When I was doing Part III, I took 6 courses to exam and did an essay, and also attended lectures for another 2-3 courses
If you're aiming for a distinction while you're there, I would say take 3-4 courses per term
thanks for the reply, did you take courses in the last term too?
There are no courses in the 3rd term
It's exam term
I think they might actually have some in the 3rd term from time to time, they might have actually had 1 when I was there?
But most of the 3rd term is revision + exam prep
are you on your own reviewing for the exam or is there a review session for each course?
anyone applying/applied to the uchicago reu? do they not have topics and just cover what u say u want to do in your research statement?
I applied
yeah i figured it out tho
I talked about just general areas I am interested in and why I want to go to UChicago's REU specifically
I wish they talked about projects but I used the extra space to talk about the math and algos club that I run
If you get accepted, keep in mind almost all projects just follow a textbook and don't end up with any original research. The disconnect between the apparent prestige and actual quality is striking, I was surprised when I found out myself.
I mean
being honest I just want a rec letter out of it 💀
Ive heard they produce a lot of good survey/expository pieces
sounds higher quality than pretty much any other reu.
I think I'd rather do a reading project that's run well where I learn something hard rather than a toy research project
Didn't the U Chicago REU get into trouble with the NSF?
aren't most REU just that?
I occasionally read some U chicago reu stuff bc they are good brief expositions on topics
honestly it will probs be a v good exp for anyone attending
they wut
Didn't they not get NSF funding this past year
Ye i heard that
Absolutely. Some people don't want to do surveys so it's a fair warning.
No, many REUs have students prove something new even if it's a small problem. Professors find problems for which it's easier to get through the research prerequisites, plus the usual picking students with tons of prior knowledge.
One group in my REU found the c-covering number for K_m x K_n for all m, n, c as this was open. Quick to start, nice to present all the way up to the meat of the construction proof, and everyone walks away happy.
I did the baruch reu and they have produced many really good papers
Do undergrad seniors normally apply to REUs? I wasn't planning on it because I think my opportunity's passed (I won't be an undergraduate anymore in a while) but if it still makes sense to apply I'll give it a go
There are some REUs that exclude senior undergrads and some that allow senior undergrads so yeah if there are any that catch your eye and that you are eligible for then you should
Of course, there are other things that you may want to spend your summer doing, like studying for prelim exams or not doing math
the VAST majority of REUs as far as I can tell do not take people who would be in the REU the summer after they graduate
so if you're a current senior your options are very limited
holy smokes! this was a big open problem!
What's a good place to read about c-covering numbers of graphs? Or maybe just what paper has the complete bipartite graph result?
try the annals of mathematics.
It's a Cartesian product of 2 complete graphs, and nothing fancy was used in the proof so there's no "place" to start.
Ah, I misread the graph in question.
Yeah they only have needs based funding this year iirc
How competitive are the 'top' grad schools? Like if you get one or two bad grades, but have good letters, and good grades for the other classes you have, is that fine? And I assume they'd want like an REU/ or like a paper?
Also, is there any more 'prestige' to going to a top school than just any other good grad school
(specifically for combo/graph theory)
They are very competitive. It depends what you mean by bad grades, what courses you got bad grades in, and your overall coursework. Having good letters and research can definitely make up for it.
Im not sure what you mean by is there more prestige to going to a top school. Obviously top schools have more prestige associated with them. How much that prestige actually matters depends.
Like, are your opportunities out of grad school (i.e work in industry, getting a postdoc, etc) somehow easier having gone to a top school, than say a different school
And like is access to 'interesting' open questions, and good advisors/academics better at said schools
there are many benefits to going to a prestigious school. But it's not the only thing.
At a better school there may be more resources, more well known faculty, etc. This can help with getting good postdocs. The average grad student may be stronger and push you to be better. It depends on the specific school though.
Guys does anyone study at Czech Technical University ?
what are some other things you should consider for your grad school
besides cost of living in the area
Research area is the main thing if you have a good idea what ur interested in
And there’s also more to living in an area than the cost, you wanna know their environment and if you can do the things u want to there
The environment of the department is also important, certain schools can have an elitist environment that maybe isn’t best suited for everyone to learn in for example
And maybe some school is known for being super supportive etc in its environment
https://www.math.uu.se/research/cim/announced-projects/ applications opens next week or so (you apply for one or more of the projects)
Utlysta CIM-projekt
Ummm
I mean presumably you have questions about the program
That you are interviewing for
At least at my institution, the interview is really intended to be a two way interview, so the faculty is interviewing you to see if you are a fit for the program, and you are interviewing the faculty to see if the program is a fit for you
most of the mentors are grad students, though there are a couple postdocs and profs as well
how your experience is may depend on what mentor you get as well, as well as if you are going to the apprentice vs full program
apprentice is generally rising 2nd years, full is most people (anyone who has taken analysis+)
Oh god I just spent an hour trying to interface with all of my different applied schools' various crappy websites in order to find my application status only to find that all of mine are still under review. Honestly the only good thing about rejections is that's one fewer horribly designed website to try to use
That being said, if Peter likes your paper, he will most likely agree to write a letter for you (incorporating comments from your mentor)
If you do go the REU, make sure to sign up for the talks at the end of the program
Also, remember that these talks aren't meant to show the audience how smart you are. On the contrary, your goal should be to make what you did over the course of the REU seem easy and effortless
At least that's how I approached them
good point, though i would say that im not sure how a rec letter like that would compare to a rec letter from a prof who you actually knows you well
can 7 pointers get Grad positions in US
I would say it turned out well for me
Though I did get rejected from Chicago for grad school
Which, in hindsight, was probably a good thing
perhaps i should have asked peter for a rec letter then lol
oh well
the chicago area is uh sketchy
peter who,peter scholze?omggg.
Sure but that's not why I think being rejected ended up being a good thing. I feel like since I really enjoyed the REU, I was viewing Chicago through rose-tinted glasses even though my research focus didn't align that much with anyone there
i see
No, the cooler Peter
that's certainly important lol
who who who
Peter Sarnak?
very good point
No he isnt at uchicago
Meter Pay
This seems like an insane way to approach giving talks imo
I never try to make my work seem that way, even expository things
Generally not a great way to approach REUs
i ddint read the second half of the sentence lol
Hmm? I'd say it sounds like a good ideal to strive for. If your exposition is so good the audience ends up thinking, "cool! I could have come up with that proof too, if only I had the idea to look at it that way", it's much better than if they think "wow! They must really be a genius if they can keep all those concepts and bizarre definitions straight".
when giving a talk you def should try to think of some things for the audience to take a way and not just sound smart and make it seem complicated
especially in an REU talk most of the audience doesnt work on your problem. Think of concrete things for them to take away that they may actually remember.
(Of course it's only an ideal if you don't achieve it by dumbing down your result to the level of facile analogies and handwaving).
Oh I don’t think the point is to make it be like “oh I’m so smart either”
But making things seem easy/effortless is another way of making yourself seem smart
I don't think so. It's about making the audience think they are smart.
Perhaps
Rather what I think is true is that when someone tries to present in this way
What ends up happening is their exposition doesn’t match up to their goals
And so the audience is under the impression that this should be easy for them to see but they’re not smart enough / this person is a genius
I have heard ppl say multiple times that it feels infantilizing to pretend math is easier than it is by giving talks this way
Trying is not the same as succeeding. But of you refrain from trying to be comprehensible simply because you may not succeed, then ... you've lost before you even begun.
You can be comprehensible without making things seem easy / effortless
Also sometimes you do just have to do a hard difficult laborious calculation
It seems insane to me that one would deliberately keep good ways to think about the problem/solution secret from the audience because we wouldn't want them to think it was too easy.
That’s not what I’m saying?
It sounds to me like you're advocating trying to make it sound more difficult than it really is.
How not?
You're saying it's a problem if the audience ends up thinking they understand what you're saying, and they will feel infantilized if, by accident, you happen to communicate an insight to them.
This is the most ungenerous reading of what I have said
It fits that complete inanity of advocating for deliberately not trying to be clear.
- identify the relevant definitions and context
- identify the questions being asked and the intuition for why these are good to questions to ask
- talk about possible approaches that don’t work and where standard techniques fail
- talk about a key insight or idea that makes the problem easier, and how my research team came to it
- reinterpret the problem through that lens
- guide the audience through how one could solve the problem@with that
That is not what I said
Your exact words were that it is "an insane way to approach giving talks".
If you do not communicate that there is difficulty in doing mathematics and where the difficulties lie you are doing just as much of a disservice to the audience
Specifically I meant the second part of the paragraph and should have clarified
I thought the first part being fine was implicit
That doesn't make it less insane to me.
The absolute apex of communicative success is if your explanation succeeds in enabling the audience to reproduce what you did.
No
The apex is going beyond
And one cannot do that without knowing where the hard parts are and why they are hard
It’s telling a fairy tale to make everything seem easy
It's wasting the audience's time if all you say is "this is so hard that you'll never understand it, nyah nyah".
That’s not what I’m saying
.
The only way to reach your goal of keeping the audience bewildered is if is you hide from them how you solved the hard problems.
talk about a key insight or idea that makes the problem easier, and how my research team came to it
By the way, why is that even part of your plan if your goal is to avoid the audience getting the idea that anything is easy?
I never said that was my goal either…
I’m going to stop talking
If you would like to see how I give talks I can send you a recording of one
You have explicitly said it is bad and "insane" if the presentation leaves the audience feeling the result is easy.
As far as I can see it the only reliable way to achieve that is to deliberately withhold the ideas that could make the result seem easy for the audience.
Yes, because that is often a lie. And gives a false impression of what mathematical research is like. You identify the difficulties explicitly as well as identify the ideas that make it approachable and easy
You're saying you don't think the audience is worthy of learning the insights that enabled you to solve the problem. You'd rather they stay in awe that you managed to do it.
???
I literally explicitly included them learning those insights
In my Outline
Christ I’m gonna make lunch
But you don't want that step in the outline to succeed to the point where the audience thinks they can follow you.
No? I do want them to think that?
I think you are assuming a lot about me and this is getting toxic
(Has been)
I'm reacting to your own words.
i mean this should be clear to anyone who has given a talk that you have to strike a balance between making ur talk understandable and doing the material you are presenting justice, and I think thats what Faye is saying
like clearly you can try to make it "too easy" and then the audience doesnt wanna listen to it
and you have a limited time so depending on how you present it you might skip over details that might make it "hard" or w/e, which maybe isnt ideal
this is a seriously uncharitable reading of what faye said
You mean this?
you dont even need to go that far
there are different levels of dumbing down the result
without going to that extreme
But clearly Bananas was not advocating for any amount of dumbing down the result when they stated an ambition of making the audience feel they understand what they're doing.
reading over the previous convo I think the confusion is this: the audience dont need to think a problem is easy for them to follow ur logic
I do think if you are trying to convince your audience "the problem was easy and effortless" it is dishonest, although i am sure its not what banana meant
infact you would often outline your research and point to the parts which are hard and which are easier to give the audience a better idea
"this lemma is the main ingredient and it requires tools from this stuff and it gets verty hard, we wont go over it in this talk"
or smth
If he had had a way to do that rather than write several hundred pages of paper, do you think he would have chosen the several hundred pages?
this is definitely more helpful then being like "oh yeah just use technique xyz for lemma and you get your result"
even if maybe this makes it seem "easy and effortless"
"just use technique xyz for lemma and you get your result" sounds like the opposite of making it seems easy and effortless.
It doesn't give the audience any sense of what's actually going on (unless you can rely on the audience already being familiar enough with technique XYZ to repeat that step in the proof).
Not everything can be easy and effortless in the first place, but assuming you're in the fortunate situation of having a way to present your argument in a way that makes it easy and effortless to follow (without cheating, as I've said) -- then I don't see any reason not to follow that way instead of a more obscure presentation.
I dont think anyone was arguing that though??? The idea is that if you are presenting research most things you cannot show to be easy and effortless, and its better to let the audience know which part is difficult rather than trying to find a way that would make the problem seem easy artificially.
Again I am certain this is not what bananas meant, but I think its good that faye pointed this out for the inexperienced talkers, you dont want someone to try too hard to fit their talk into this box and either have a dishonest talk or a handwavy one.
That is a much more qualified statement than the original
Sorry that happens when I’m texting in the middle of class lol
anyhow to whoever was asking about the REU talks or w/e
what i wrote above is probably a more complete version of what bananas wanted to say, that while you should make the appropriate part as digestable as u can, you should know that not every part of what you did was easy and its fine to point out to the audience when you are blackboxing parts how difficult it was and what u did etc
Perhaps a reasonable synthesis would be that one should have a, hmm, "bimodal" detail level. What you can explain in a reasonably easy to follow way, within the time constraints, do so. But if there are parts you cannot explain easily, then don't attempt to make up for it by filling slides with obscure details nobody will be able to follow; instead explicitly say you won't be able to cover that part and just skip directly to when a conclusion that the audience will understand pops out of it.
yeah sure
I was talking about the end-of-REU Chicago talks specifically. Basically, I wanted to say that since these talks are aimed at undergraduates and are expository, you shouldn't get too much into technical details. Here is what I would focus on
- Why people should care
- What the philosophy behind the approach is
- A (very brief) overview of technical issues
- A few easy examples of your topic in action
For example, if I was talking about motivic homotopy, I would focus on
- Homotopy theory is a powerful tool in topology and we want a similar theory in algebraic geometry
- It is better to work in a good category with bad objects than in a bad category with good objects
- Instead of considering circle spectra as we do in normal homotopy theory, we now need to consider circle and Tate circle (G_m) bispectra
- P^n/P^{n-1} (whatever that means) behaves as the n-sphere in motivic homotopy theory. A bit more difficult example would be realizing algebraic K-theory as a consequence of motivic homotopy theory (this would probably not be a good example for general undergraduates, but a lot of people at the REU were learning the basics of K-theory so it could have worked)
For general talks, I have heard that 25% of your talk should be understood by the entire audience, 50% by people working in adjacent fields, and 80% by experts in the field
Whose the other 20% for?
^
Most professor's I've talked to have said that only the speaker (and maybe some close collaborators) understand all details of research level talks completely
At least initially
It might work out that way in practice, but I don't think anyone should be planning a talk with the intent that 20% of it will be lost on everyone in the room.
I dont think they have to be lost but not everyone is going to completely understand every detail
Sure. What I meant by that is even if no one understand 100% of what you said, that doesn't mean that the talk was bad
You should aim for it to be as clear as possible (with the time that you've been given)
You should also just say less if you can’t be clear and say everything in the time.
The rest is like this yo, 1% luck, 2% skill, 1.5% concentrated power of will, 0.5% pleasure, 5% pain, and 10% reason to remember the slides.
Lmfao
i think all of those are off by about a factor of 10
No, they add up to 20
went right over my head
Guys how do I look at research interests for different schools
I am interested in optimization and statistics
most schools have a "faculty research area" page or something like that
Research at Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University
for instance
and you can see who works in the area and what they specifically do
You also might want to look specifically at statistic departments as well and if you like OR then business departments too
If you like optimization look into cs and operations research too
Depending on the dept they can have a decent amount of optimization
Also aerospace or ECE (specifically control theory)
my research rn is with an aerospace prof, lots of optimization work
Hey all,
The graduate application season is over, and schools are returning results. As #graduate-applications has served its purpose, and as we wish to ensure the server's culture does not become too strained by the return of results, we will be closing this channel until next application season.
If you have any out-of-season questions on the graduate application process, consider asking elsewhere in the server, such as in #advanced-lounge . If you would like to be informed on what schools have posted results/what sort of applications get in/etc., this server is not the place for it — please go elsewhere.
(To clarify, this was always the plan for this channel and was not the result of any specific incident or conversation. As mentioned, we're planning on bringing it back for the next application cycle, probably around August or September.)
Hello.
This channel has been reopened for the 2024 application season.
I'd like to stress to try to prevent discourse becoming too pessimistic, bitter, or toxic. We would like this channel not to negatively impact server culture.
Feel free to ask questions relating to the application process. We'd rather avoid topics like "chance me" or "what's the minimum to get into X", however — the reality is that any such claims made on this server are unsubstantiated due to the obscurity and unpredictability of admissions panels, and may promote an overly competitive culture. If you'd like advice on where to apply, we'd recommend asking an advisor or experienced professor who's familiar with your experience!
whats a good way to ask a prof for a letter of rec over email specifically
i know how to do irl and thats how i usually do it
but email paralysis
keep it short
"Hello [professor],
I was a student in your [whatever] class and worked with you on [bleh].
I am applying to graduate schools for a [target degree name] in [field] this fall. Would you please be willing to kindly write me a letter of recommendation? I can provide a list of schools I'm applying to [on request/at a later date/etc.].
Regards,"
something like this
just explain how you know them so that they know what to write about, what your goal is, and ask nicely
if you know your deadlines it might be good to include those as well, but most profs know it's roughly mid-december
kool thank u
For people in the US, you really should start working on your NSF GRFP applications now
sheesh already?
Yes
will taking a gap year, while e.g. teaching and maybe working in a small project or two, affect my eventual grad admissions at all? What are grad schools' impressions on this, is it a common sight etc.
(I'm kinda convinced the answer is "no" if I can write a strong application regardless, but I guess I'm looking for concrete, if a bit anecdotary evidence here)
oh for context I'm finishing a MSc and considering PhD anywhere in US or Europe (undecided). Considering a gap year due to burnout, mental health and economic issues
Taking a gap year is pretty common
There are two ways to go about it
The first is to just apply the next cycle
The second is to apply this cycle and defer your admission a year
Which one you choose to do is up to you
Working on small projects may make for a stronger application but your letter writers may also forget some things about you
yeah I've read about this but apparently some schools are a bit reluctant to defer admissions, applying later sounds like a safer bet considering I'm still undecided about things basically
Most schools I know deal with deferred admissions in a reasonable way in that they expect some people to
And they let them
I see
I'd ask them in person first ig
if its possible
Not possible they are in minnesota
sobbissimo
Every reu student forgot to ask and now we all have to do that
How common are defering offers? This seems to be my plan this year and I am a little bit worried my defer request gets rejected
As stated above, depends on where. Where I am it would not be possible more than a few months at most. A year would never happen.
(EU)
I am assuming it is more common in the U.S. right ?
I wouldn’t say that it’s common, but at my institution one or two people defer every year
In EU, I know at least 2 PhD students who worked in some firms for a few years, before quitting to do PhD
It's not the most common, but there are cases
I'll recommend talking to your referers about your intention, so that they won't forget you. Of course the letters won't be as strong, as they can only testify your abilities while you're in school. But one year won't make a huge difference.
I'd also recommend reading papers in your area from time to time, just to be informed, so that you won't forget everything when you decide to do a PhD afterwards.
ohwut
man
Due in <2 months
Its common to start apps in summer
Yes I should say that starting now is considered late
Currently building my list of schools. My interest is in geometry and topology, so I've mostly been looking at schools ranked by US News and checking how many people are working in certain subfields of geometry and topology. Is there a better way to do this?
Look up NSF grants for geometry and topology.
Oooh good idea
How should I approach the research statement if I haven't done research?
You write about research you plan on doing
Past experiences all go in the personal statement
The research statement is a plan for research
So you should explain a research question, some related work, and potential techniques you might use, as well as why the question is interesting
There is no requirement to do the research though
Right, sorry, this is my main concern
Like, how should I pick a question or know what tools to use? That's all way above my level
Seems like I'd need a PhD already to answer those questions
Ask your letter writers
I've been doing mine from AMS idk if this is good though
Wdym from AMS?
Ah, right. I looked at this too. I searched for the Geometry/Topology speciality and then investigated schools I was vaguely familiar with.
what consists of a good application for applying to good public Universities in Germany?
@dreamy vale
not sure honestly
letters or recommendtaion are important obviously, apart from that in my experience the master thesis is highly valued because its a pretty good indicator for how someone does math
I am sorry I missed out an important detail
I am an undergrad and I will be applying for a masters program
@dreamy vale
oh well, i dont know the experience for internationals, but in general the goal is to accept everyone
there are some uhh technical requirements but those mostly consist of classes taken in [subject]
example:
Minimum requirements for admission to the Master programme Mathematics International are the following:
courses totalling at least 70 ECTS credits in the following fields of mathematics: Analysis (differential and integral calculus in one or several variables) ordinary and partial differential equations, vector analysis, complex analysis, linear algebra, algebra, number theory, geometry, discrete mathematics, functional analysis, numerical mathematics, stochastics, financial mathematics, operations research, optimization, mathematical modelling and scientific computing,
courses totalling at least 10 ECTS credits in the aforementioned or other fields of mathematics,
courses totalling at least 30 ECTS credits in any field of mathematics or in subjects which apply mathematical methods (e.g., biology, chemistry, geography, computer science, aerospace computer science, physics, economics).The number of ECTS credits corresponds to the estimated workload associated to the course (including time solving exercise problems and preparation for the exam): one ECTS credit corresponds to 25-30 hours.
a masters isnt like a phd; the uni spends no ressources on having more masters students (at least in mathematics...), in fact they get paid for having more students
at least thats the story for nationals at most unis (maybe not at Bonn...), i am not sure how its for internationals
I need to get on this - want to apply to a master's program
dumb question - what is the average number of programs that people apply to per cycle?
I'm applying to 15 💀
I applied to 15
Also normal
fuark
Yeah a lot of people apply to double digits especially if they want to do multiple fields like TCS and Math or such
5
But it depends on where u wanna go and what your profile is
There is a threshold in EU, where no school, and I mean literally no school, would say no.
Lot's of people are rejected from the master's programs here.
Everyone in my circle has not been rejected from any uni
I think we have about 30% acceptance rate. I know of programs with less than 10%.
😄 even 10% is not that low. There exists a threshold of profile for that.
Maybe I happen to find myself with a lot of geniuses. But those figures have never been our concern.
i dont think the bragging is necessary, the numbers speak for themselves
I was told to ask here: How much on the putnam is enough to make a difference for graduate applications?
big fish in a small pond. those people never succeed and always blame everybody but themselves when they fail after a few years of postdoc...nobody wants to work with them
Some schools will care more than others
Like MIT will definitely care
∀ ϵ>0 ∃ δ>0 such that...
What is the point you are trying to make?
All I'm saying is the number of applications should be case-dependent, and there's little point in asking the average of number of applications. It costs as hell to apply, so if you're absolutely confident you'll get in somewhere, there's no need to shotgun to double digits.
should I take the gre subject test? some programs strongly recommend it such as Rutgers, which I really want to get to, although I don't have a high gpa, average rec letters and no research exp. I wish I knew about them, I applied to one but it was too late. I think I will do ok on the gre but analysis is not my strong point, and i read that most of it is analysis, I like more algebra.
My goal is to apply to 15+ schools, regardless
Most is calculus but yes you should take it
If you do bad you can always exclude it or retake (time permitting)
there are only a few schools that require math GRE now, a list of them can be find on google.
How much time would you spend preparing for it
Are you applying this year
Do you think you will get 75th+ percentile
Keeping in mind that it is mostly calculus and the most difficult thing is the time constraint and not the math
Everyone will tell you there's no good answer but that seems like bullshit to me
yes it's case dependent, but there's gotta be a ballpark and also how do you know what case you are?
I think the answer to this is 10ish
I think I applied to 11 and that worked out for me
I am very far from an expert on this, but imo if you apply to at least 10 you're probably fine. Applying to fewer is fine too if you want something more specialized and there aren't as many programs that fit the bill.
Yeah apply to at least 10 unless you absolutely cannot
you live in france...
What does that have to do with anything? 😄
A good way is to ask people who share similar profiles as yours: possibly alumni, similar experiences, GPA, research interest, etc. They know you much, much better, than we some strangers on internet do, and can give better advices
Yeah this is good advice
Also to be clear I applied to programs last year, I was just low-key ranting about how difficult it was to get a straight answer for how many programs to apply to
If anyone wants to make a website, this is one option: https://github.com/academicpages/academicpages.github.io
actually, do y'all think it's good to have a website?
My peers and I, we applied without, but by no means it was a good sample
Hi, I would like to ask two questions:
-
Is it a big burden for professors to write you a letter and send it to programs? I do not want to bother them, but I need letters... :S
-
If some personal tragedy has happened to me during my studies, which hindered my performance, should I mention something like "I have overcome X situation...", or is it better not to mention it?
If you need letters, then you have to ask for letters.
they will just write one and attach it to each application which will take a few mins each
as long as you give them plenty of time and don't send them 30 reference requests an hour before the deadline you shouldn't worry
& it's sort of just part of their job xd
Is e-mailing them 2 months before deadline good enough?
My prof agreed last year to write me a letter, but I haven't had any contact with him since he retired, he became an emeritus prof since then. I don't have a large faculty and the other 2 profs I didn't do so well with them, 1 is stats and the other topology. Stats(got A and C) I simply don't see the point, and topology (got C) b/c i didnt study, i was focused more on group theory (i love group theory) but he's a nice prof, we had many good talks during his office hrs, even invited me to see a presentation w his research peers, although i wasn't really interested about the topic (k theory of Z/pZ and 93 connected subsets of the cube) I didnt know what k theory was at the time, i know a little more now however still baby steps. Finally, I'm not sure if I should ask either him or the retired prof about a rec letter?
Note: I already have 2 profs where I did well (algebra & dynamical systems), the whole question above is regarding the 3rd rec letter.
it's not bad. I think its a good idea as a grad student.
ask the retired prof
yea that's good
Usually, 2 weeks to a month should be enough already. However, each prof is different, and you should ask for their preference. What I did was when I decided which profs I would ask for reclets, I talked to them months before the deadline - when they were in no rush, and not in the flood of requests from others - where I asked how long before the deadline I should ask.
Writing rec letters is part of the job description for professors. As long as you ask respectfully and don't wait until the last minute you'll be fine.
ive heard you want to ask at least a month in advance
if you have actual work to show then sure -- it's definitely not a must for applicants or early grads but from what I've seen people tend to make one once they've published some things and have more or less clear interests
it's kind of like an extended CV + repo for preprints, notes, blogs or whatever you want to share
I was thinking of creating one, just to have my notes somewhere, b/c you never know these days even w/ a personal laptop or memory device.
If it serves anyone:
For full transparency I had a strong application getting admitted into Berkeley and Columbia, but I still planned to apply to 15 places and ultimately applied to 12.
Unless you’re omega-cracked in which case unless you have a stupid amount of impostor syndrome you’ll know you can go anywhere you want, from my understanding there’s a large part of applications that are a crapshoot. I was advised to cast a wide net, and so I did.
If it helps to see the spread of universities I applied to the list was:
Harvard
MIT
Columbia
Berkeley
Brown
Princeton
Stanford (didn’t apply in the end because I mixed up deadlines)
UMich
UCLA
Duke (didn’t end up applying)
UIC (didn’t end up applying)
UW-Madison
UW-Seattle
Stony Brook
UUtah
I agree. I think when you’re below cracked/prodigy but have a very strong application its a crapshoot. You could get into amazing schools or you can get super unlucky and get in nowhere.
I had two friends that had good apps and are very good. One got in nowhere (only applied to like 5) and one applied to 12 similar to your list and got into UW and got into an ivy off the waitlist in early April.
how do I reach out to profs
like say there's a prof I'm interested in working with and I'd want to be their PhD student and really the only way I'd go there is if (among other things) they were my advsior
how does that work
Dear Professor Lastname,
I'm a prospective PhD student at SUNY Podunk, and I think your research is interesting. Can you please let me know whether you'll be taking students in the next few years?
Thanks,
@smoky jetty
If they reply with “yes i am taking students” how do you reply? Do you try to establish any connection or you just say thanks and hint that u r applying for their dept ?
This seems a little curt, but probably is okay for a first email (you don't want to waste time on first contact)
If the reply is "yes" I think the assumption is that you now have room for a longer email detailing research and further conversation. In most cases since specific professors won't be on admission committees or, even if they are, I'd think they are one voice, you'd still need to get admitted to their specific university
i didn't unless they said "please let me know when you apply" which a few did
(i think two such requests were at unis I got in to, [another two or so at unis I didn't] third one none of the profs I contacted replied to me but still got an offer)
Mine was I'm currently a maths student at [...] and I'm looking to study a PhD in Mathematics starting Fall 2023 in the area of [...], especially [...]. I wanted to ask if you were planning on taking on PhD students from the Fall 2023 class.
make sure the first [...] is something they actually do
oops should've applied to the person above xd
i'm not sure i would worry about talking about the specifics of their research unless you're at a level where you can understand it on any non-superficial levle (which I'd imagine most non-cracked people won't be)
This is a better email
i think the important thing to show is that you haven't just bulk emailed every prof in the department the same thing and are thinking how they would be a good fit for you
Why next few
Why not next fall?
Because you don't commit to an advisor, you commit to a program
Once you arrive and pass your quals and take classes then you start talking to your prospective advisor
So usually you finalize your advisor your second or third year

Wait what if I wanna work with Prof X and when the time after quals comes around, Prof X is busy
?
thats why you should ideally apply to schools where more than one person could possibly advise you
(all but one of mine, which was a crapshoot anyway, had at the very least 2 if not 3 or 4 in my area)
like I took no as a no (and this actually made me avoid like 2 choices) and yes as a "not no" rather than any kind of commitment on their end
taking no as a no is definitely a good idea
yeah the ones that said no were either retiring, (at least 3) moved out of the research area, or were over-committed and very unlikely to take on anyone
so it wouldn't even theoretically change
yea I'm planning on this anyways
but like this one person's interests at USC (Greta Panova) basically perfectly cover all of my interests
but just them, rest of USC meh
everywhere else I'm seriously looking at so far as >= 3 people I think do cool things
is it okay to ask a postdoc at my uni to evaluate my application and to ask which unis i should apply to? he has always been very nice to me
but i dont want to be overly demanding...
Why not ask if you're asking too much when you ask for this?
Communication is a natural tool in social interaction
thank you
i would like to avoid awkward moments... but i'm really lost rn and i dont know at which programs i have a chance
so i guess i will e-mail them
😖
It won't be awkward
If you are not very familiar with the particular person and be certain that they are a good fit, I personally think choosing a department with a sizable group on the topic you are interested is important.
Yea probably
Discussions generate more ideas and even motivations to keep going.
Also if you get into a program and they're not accepting students literally next fall, you can bide your time for a year or two and then still get them as your advisor.
If you're emailing a professors about phd, is it okay to mention that you know (took classes with, discussed with) a prof who is one of his main collaborators ?
i would speak to them first!
Tell your prof, if the prof sets you in contact with the person you are emailing, your success rate shoots up.
if you have a sufficiently close relationship with that prof you could try to link up with the other prof through them
yes this
When u email profs asking them whether they are taking students and they answer with "yes" should u follow up with more info or just thats it ?
I wouldnt
You can always just say. If you need more information, please let me know. I plan to apply in (insert time frame) to (these schools). I will let you know once ive sent my application. Thank you
If they said yes, then if they need more info, theyll let you knkw
Was wondering what I could do to strengthen my application to masters programs
I'm 4th year at ucla and im a math & econ major with a cs minor
I have a shit gpa 3.4 that was heavily influenced by covid/family deaths
My last 3 quarters ive gotten straight A's
I'm going to study hard for the GRE to try to get a near perfect score (esp for q)
And I'm doing a senior research project on fitting volatility curves with KNN
The list of places im going to apply to in order of preferences:
NYU Courant Financial Math
UChicago Financial Math
Stanford MCF
MIT MFin
CMU MSCF
Princeton MFin
Columbia MAFN
NYU MFE
Columbia MFE
Berkley MFE
Cornell CFEM
UCLA MFE
GaTech QCF
Yale Asset Management
I was wondering if anyone knows any other schools that have good applied/computational math or statistics masters programs (should I just apply to the same schools?)
I really am interested in learning more, but I don't think I have a good shot at ANY PhD programs that I'd want to apply to
And I probably eventually want to go into some sort of algorithmic trading job, so I don't think a PhD would be a fit
courant #1 😎
haha yea nyu and uchicago are kinda tied for first since recruiting for CBOE/NYSE related jobs goes hard
Haha I go to nyu for ug, so proud school moment?
Why not
GRE doesn't matter that much
From what I am familiar with most of the NYC quant firms recruit phds
a lot seem to recruit smart undergrads too
The stated assumption that you're a complete idiot, pretty much moots any talk of graduate applications...
There are places that offer "whatever you want your fancy diploma to say for complete idiots". But I'm pretty sure only for complete idiots who can pay.
(And they cannot be relied on to bother to teach anything before selling you said fancy diploma).
i don't think "if I'm a complete idiot" is very helpful, we're going to need a more realistic take on your ability and current qualifications
like self-deprecation is cool and all but it does prevent us from giving you any useful advice xd
the first three are all standard grad classes that you should find virtually everywhere (?), the fourth you will need to hunt a bit more for since it's not the most fashionable thing
what kind of parameters are you looking for schools based off
yeah the SJSU classes look well below the level you're looking for
what undergrad do you have
do you have like standard math classes
Do you have letters of recommendations that would back you up?
Oh ok those are good
The college prof plus thesis advisor that is, have a talk with them about your application
They will need to write letters to make up for lack of classes on transcript
All the more reason to have a meeting with them
You def want to make sure they remember you!
So remind them
Idk really about northern cali except the big schools
I’d say with your limited application you have to be willing to move around quite a bit
Like you might be able to get a school appropriate for u in a different state
Even in cali you might have to move quite a bit
Places like uc riverside, Irvine etc are p good
And aren’t bad to get into
Well I have never heard of it’s math dept
So that’s not a good sign
But you should look into them
Look into what research they do, talk to profs there to get some stats etc
Idk much about it but supposedly it has some math, again you should research these on your own
wtf is a CV and how is it different to my resume
I know it's different
but tbh don't know how to lay it out and what I should (or really, can) put on it
can I put that I've made and run meetings for some math related clubs? undergrad seminar talks? seminar talks about my REU work? courses?
Yes
anyone willing to share their CV (DM me, feel free to anonymize it)
There is a pinned template if you want
oh neat
oh I can put teaching experience
I don't see a thing for courses, but I'd guess that's not something I put?
Also someone in my REU group is giving a presentation on our work at a different university. I am not the one speaking so I'd guess I cannot put that talk appearing there on my CV?
got it
not sure if this is the channel to post but what are things i can do to make my grad application omega cracked 
i have 4 years.
Take hard classes, get good grades, get to know profs well, do research
mmm
If you can try to participate in REUs, summer schools and other opportunities like that
where should i start with trying to get into research
It depends on your background. Its probably a good idea to at least have ug algebra and analysis under your belt. Then as you take classes and find out what you like try to talk to profs/postdocs ab research opportunities
already have those 2 under my belt
What you need is highly dependent on what field you want to do research in
So as you take classes and figure out what the general field you’d be interested in doing research with you can talk to profs that work in that area
i mean i already have an idea what field i want to get into
the problem is figuring out how to get to know the profs
Email them, take classes with them, attend seminars and talk to them
Its hard to be more specific without knowing more about your situation.
The advice is different for someone w just ug intro analysis and algebra than someone with knowledge of graduate level topics.
You can email profs and tell them about your background and interests and ask them for advice ab getting involved in research.
Many profs are happy to speak w passionate undergrads
yeah i should try getting comfortable with talking with profs
If you plan on staying in academia then ya you should
Get in good with professors who have friends at the grad schools you want to go to
I need a topic to discuss on my post degree ( specialization). Does anyone can give me an idea?
What does "summer schools" mean here? Just summer courses? or something special?
any math phd students here....?
Something special like: https://www.ias.edu/pcmi/programs/pcmi-2022-undergraduate-summer-school
They're like a week or two week long series of lectures surrounding a single topic
so my univeristy held one that I went to on using algebraic techniques in a certain type of graph problem. It was 5 days of 4 talks per day, learned some cool things.
Mostly grad students go to them but if you find one that sounds interesting and can somehow find a way to get funding to go, try that
Some are longer like pcmi that i sent above.
o
Get in good with profs. Period.
You never know where you'll find something useful.
Does anyone has suggestions on writing a personal statement? Like, where should I look, because I have no idea, other than “I like Harmonic analysis”
i am not sure if this helps. i have a specific phd program in mind, so i start to write my statement of purpose by looking at this phd program's website. In the website, it might say something about what they want to read in your sop, like your education/career objectives, research experiences, role as a teaching assistant, any particular faculty member you want to work with, etc.
Okay, that’s helpful 🙂 thanks, I’m just worried because I don’t really have any “experience”…. But I guess I can talk about my experience with previous professors/graduate students that I did a project with
you can also reach out to your professors to see what they did for theirs, and see if they'd be willing to review yours and offer feedback. I was in a similar boat and asked both my advisors what they did, and they showed me how they did theirs and why, and that helped immensely
“advisor” as in? I don’t have an advisor as an undergrad😭
Or do you mean prospective advisor?
If you don't have any professional qualifications (which I assume mean formal statuses that entitle you to practice an otherwise restricted trade) to declare, I'd just click "next" immediately.
Okay thanks, didn't realize I could skip it...
a lot of colleges, undergrad or above, have advisors who help with courses and etc (at least in the US)
Did my math masters, 2:1, last year @ Bristol, UK. I put off the idea of immediately applying at the time cus, well, didn't feel confident at all and wanted a break from studying. Truth be told, I floated pretty heavily through half my 3rd/4th yr courses (ADHD things). I want to get back into studying, eventually phd student hopefully, and actually, feel like I want to do another math masters if possible because my knowledge is probably on that of a Bachelors.
I've had a year to float around on here, and feel pretty confident I can get back into it. I haven't much clue where or what I should start looking into if I want to go down this route, don't have any contacts to talk to really - so anyone have any advice? Maybe that 2nd masters is a bad/impossible idea and I should self-study back to scratch?
[Am currently working in crypto as a quant, but no particular attachment here in the long term]
I don't see why a second master is a bad idea, you can always do Master on another aspect of Math. Say, you did applied math, and now you wanna do something more fundamental.
I'm most interested in algebra, am not really aware of masters being particularly specialized (mine wasn't)
algebra/category/foundations stuff has interested me in the last year
Idk any Master degree saying explicitly the topic of studies either. That said, there are programs where you can very much personalise your curriculum and do only what you want.
Iirc, the one at Bonn is an example
I see. In terms of where, at the back of my mind I don't rlly have a good impression of UK unis apart from Oxbridge. I don't have other languages, so abroad I feel like I'd be considering ones in the US/Germany?
Am not really all that aware of good places 😅
Thing is I don't work in math either 😄 so I have very few clues.
thanks tho, will talk to ppl
When it comes to Math, at least the Germans are very tolerant and have English Master (as opposed to French ppl).
But it also comes to your capability too. Bonn is amazing, no doubt. But it might be too much, if you don't plan to have Habilitation and aim for a Wolf prize or something.
It's no good if you can't digest them all
So most places would make me take an exam? to apply for a masters
I don't think so. I just fear if you could follow the courses
Ah I see.
I looked at Part III from Cambridge Tripos, and I feared for my own life 😄
part iii sounds like a good idea to apply to
Ill have a better idea when I see course structures ig
like you can just choose your courses
You get your own personal tutor and all to discuss (every week?) iirc
uh
Just that you will have to bust your ass off for a year.
idk if uk student loans can still apply to me. if so yeah, thatd be way better lol. think they should
well there are office hours but most people don't go because they're antisocial
Why am I not surprised 😄
i take it going abroad, im almost certainly going to be paying for myself, for masters at least
ah it actually appears, probably not.
yeah if you already did a masters
I'm very tempted to say come to Paris 😄 but then, idk how hard it'd be if you don't speak French
At ENS, all the courses have schedule publicly available, you can choose to pick a class and sit in.
The only shitty thing is they don't offer Master in Math. Altho, they do co-organise with PSL.
Also I don't think you get to choose as much. French ppl like generalism approach
Well, with math, its never been too clear to me what im getting out of a degree I couldnt by self-studying. At least I very much felt that way in Bristol.
Yh there are office hours, and the courses are structured but... yeah idk 😓
I've found this server to be much more helpful than office hours
just got to make myself learn the things i want to though...
I like talking with profs in person, and possibly have useful connections after. Covid time makes me very intolerant to online meeting, courses through YouTube, or self-studying with pdfs.
Yeah I definitely did not make the most out of office hours and such before.
At least until you become an expert in your topic, having some guidance is useful. They point you to problems they know to be of your calibre and worth investing it.
Right, fair enough
I want to apply for some universities in Hong Kong for MPhil, can anyone tell me what's a sample research paper, they asked me to make one of 15 pages, I got my bachelors in CS, I don't have any idea.
damm son
B.Sc thesis?
its written sample research paper / bachelor thesis on their site
so, either your thesis or some other paper/manuscript if you have one
No, I don't have any paper of my own, I got my bachelor in CS
they asked of 15 pages sample research paper, what does sample means here
actually I need a university badly
A sample of your academic writing
Can you please tell me more about it, one example please if you have
Many people do expository thesis for their thesis degree, so it isn't necessarily an on par publishable research paper they are asking for based on your description. If your college library have a collection of past thesis you could start from there for examples.
But if you are applying this year, I also would not suppose there's enough time for you to produce a thesis quality piece of paper if you are starting from scratch (unless you are very exceptional).
Well, its good to read you guys talking about it
I am trying to looking for a theme to talk about it. But soo far I coudn´t find nothing . I need help
A theme for a research paper?
Yes
I am trying to apply on a Master, but here on Brazil I need to make a specialization to prepare for my Master.
Then maybe do something close to the specialization you are thinking of?
wait is specialization comparable to a thesis or something?
I need to write a research paper. Just some applications about a theorem , its pretty simple
but I have to find something interesting .
allegedly, doing an obscure combinatorics problem is the fastest way to producing research level material
there are always things to count
one of my profs counts these combinatorics papers as a negative in a Ph.D. application
the trick is to motivate the counting by some other field that's what I'm doing rn
are you talking of working on open problems in combinatorics?
I'm beginning some more combinatorial research and in my first meeting with the people I'm working with we talked about how we need to actually motivate the problem as something people may care about so that it's not just "we invented and solved some random counting problem"
Why does this professor look down upon undergraduate research in combinatorics?
He said that this means that you have very low standards for publishing; for him it's better to just take hard classes and do well and keep learning more math instead of doing some combo problem to publish as an undergrad.
Hmmm makes sense
I think by "these combinatorics papers" he means like toy problems no one cares about
but like for an undergrad I think that's fine?
Yeah that's what I felt they meant too
I've heard people say that they don't hold undergrads to the same standard as more experienced researchers when it comes to assessing their publications, but then I have also heard the sentiment expressed earlier multiple times
I think holding undergrads to the same standards of experienced researchers is crazy
If people do that then I'm fucked lol
That seems to be what the above mentioned professor does
Not sure how common that is
Hello
I need a graduate friend who can help me in maths , i am in first year of BSc maths and its going little hard for me 🥲
Wrong channel. I suggest you go to the channel pertaining to the topic(s) you are finding difficult, and ask for specific help rather than asking for a 'graduate friend'.
No not really
Guys, I'm wondering which course should I go with, I can choose between mathematics and maths and computer science, I'm mainly interested in machine learning and AI which I need maths for however I'm already in a good coding level and I believe that coding can be learned on your own. I don't know if the mathematics course would contain a load of stuff that I wont actually use for machine learning.
For masters or phd?
For research statements, how formal is it supposed to be for PhD applications? Should I do it like writing an expository paper, with questions, remarks, propositions etc., or should I avoid block of maths in the statement and give a short glossary?
I did not write mine like an expository paper
fair. It's just that I found out somebody's statement is 24 pages long that worried me a little bit.
You should not do that
A research statement should be 1 or 2 pages, the application will usually specify
In fact, writing a 24 page research statement is a good way to get rejected
Ya this is insane
24?!
(ignore if I can't ask this) What are some good schools that do computational algebra (group theory and/or commutative algebra)
I have no one to ask about this at my university as far as I can tell nor at my REU 😔
I know that bernd sturmfels does some stuff at berkeley
Have you looked at authors of papers and checked what institutions they're at
1: not sure of what journals to look at
2: what I have found seems to be mostly in Europe
So far I've only found Hulpke at Colorado
My prof who was going to write me a rec letter passed away last week, he was kind enough to give me reference books. I'm not sure what will I do now, since the department is very small, I'm thinking of emailing my topology prof who is going to organize an event to honor him, but I did really bad on his topology class (C+), even though he invited me for seminars, and showed me some pics by Escher
What do you want to do? I think you should join the event
I think invariants is looking for advice on rec letters
If you think the topology prof is your best option, email them and ask if they can write a good letter
Oh right, I missed that, people passing away seems more important
my entire thesis was only 32 pages
Is it acceptable ask a prof you’re planning on taking a class with in the coming semester for a recommendation letter (it would be due soon after the final exam)? If yes, how do I go about it?
You can certainly ask, it's up to them if they agree or not
I don't want to break the rules of the discord, so let me know if I can ask here. (Whether or not someone answers is okay, just want to make sure it's alright.)
Can I ask a question here about undergraduate math scholarships/applications, etc.? Or just sort-of advice?
Keep this channel focused on graduate admission. You could try #advanced-lounge for talking about other applications.
Okay, thank you. 🙂
I'm applying to Math/CS grad programs and it's kind of weird how my SOP outline is going considering how different my research experiences are.
Outline:
Intro:
I'm interested in the mathematical structures underlying optimization for Artificial Intelligence, and how we can improve our understanding of them with applications from numerical linear algebra and random matrix theory. (Now refer to specific work from professors at that school)
Experience:
I have worked on 3 projects in math/cs.
- A kind of "technically weak" paper (no heavy math, in fact it's mostly linear regression) in machine learning which my mentor thinks has a strong message.
- A paper that proves an "obvious result" in metric geometry of surfaces with bounded curvature joint work with 3 others has been submitted to a bunch of top journals and rejected but with positive feedback.
- Improving a code library to improve performance of a calculation by 300% using parallelization and compilers.
Research Interests:
- Expand on two points: (could actually be a bunch of things but I like loss landscape geometry and tensor algorithms the most )
Look Forward to Work
(now mention professors again/institutes).
basically there is very little connection between what I have done and my interests.
Also, is it worth shooting for top programs with no actual publications?
I have two potential publications but they are in pre-print hell
https://simonscollab.icerm.brown.edu/team/ just filter by computational
find the professor -> school
oh neat
Also like you should look up computational algebraic geometry
Algebraic Geometry is a extension of group theory/commutative algebra
John Voight is pretty well known for his work on making a database of modular forms.
is that the kind of stuff you like to do?
Also I was told by another professor at BU that Jenn Balakrishnan is a really good person to work with if you like number theory and algorithms.
this might give you some indication too
anyone wanna critique my CV 👉 👈 (DM plz)
Ya
what was it about?
No
That gif is too cheery for this channel
This place is not a place of honour
Hello. Is doing at least one REU a must for applying to masters programs in Germany?
The situation is that my college releases semester results late and I think the applying dates for all REUs here would be finished by the time these people declare semester results.
So it's a possibilty that I might not be able to apply for the REUs
It is not necessary
this is some SOP advice from another server, does it really apply to Math at all?
Yes, except that you don't need to have a single PI/advisor in mind
Do U.S universities do interview for PhD admissions ?
From what I know, it's not the norm. Duke does.
Nice
Ikr, I was asking because their advise sounds like for lab-based programs where defining PIs is a must
Some do interviews
So for research interests, I don't have to be specific and can have general ideas of what I want to work on, right?
Yes
Caltech does for Physics afaik
A big problem with math is that there's a lot of math that you still don't really know even as a first year PhD student. For example, you may have never heard of geometric group theory in your undergrad despite it being a massive area of math research, so you're less likely to know that you want to research that in particular. Same goes for most areas of math - if you don't know that it even exists, you can't say that you want to do it.
You might have a broad area you want to do - "I want to do algebraic number theory" or "I want to do PDEs" and so forth - but knowing what you want to specialize in beyond those broadest of strokes is hard to do as an undergrad, and having spoken with professors at least where I am now, it seems like they want first years to be able to keep something of an open mind.
In addition, (Pure) Math typically isn't lab-based, so it's not like one needs to identify the PI of a lab as a condition for the admission or know if that advisor will take prospective students from day one.
It also irks me when this person claims not knowing research topics is a death sentence though (regardless, it's vital for a Math PhD applicant to have general sense of what she's getting into), such an elitist attitude that doesn't help anybody.
i think umich also does or did, i don't remember which one; but my mentor mentioned this to me at one point
but most do not
Most places I applied to did
But the interview are for people who pass an initial sort of screening
Examples were:
Berkeley
UMich
Columbia
UUtah
Stony Brook
did they interview you about research or something?
What I wanted to study, answer questions about the program, maybe ask a bit about what I did
They were not technical
yes, that's what I thought
What are some things I should avoid to not diminish my chances of getting into a good grad program?
Bad grades
do undergrad grades really matter? not really related to graduate application but im thinking of investing less this semester and wondering how it might affect my future career
They matter some. As long as they're all you have to show that purport to be at least somewhat objective indicators of your ability to dig down into something for the long haul, then of course people who need to compare you to other applicants (for whatever) in a hurry will look at them.
You can harm yourself by investing so much that you burn out, and you can harm your prospects by investing too little. It's pretty much impossible for random strangers on the internet to know which side of the optimum your current level of effort is.
They definitely matter.
Most good programs are going to expect very good grades in math classes and good coursework.
I push to getting a 95 average while I could much more easily settle on 90, because 95 is where the top excellence program here cuts off. Is that pushing too high?
85 here has the expectance of "average", although I suspect the average is lower
Jek what would you say is "very good"?
That absolutely depends on the uni. 90 at Princeton and 90 at a small community college are quite different. But in either case if you're getting around 95s that should be sufficient
Also varies across countries too
Yeah no easy answers eh
I do believe many applications committees also view grading scales quite differently between graduate and undergrad classes
Most grad classes are more lightly graded and this is taken into account
Which creates a rather irritating paradox of taking grad classes and not getting a perfect A can be a detractor compared to simply taking a standard pace of undergraduate courses
Interesting. Our professors grade the undergrads very lightly
This might be a fairly specific thing
Grade inflation is also a thing in the US
Im not sure how your grading scale works. Being in the top excellence program (whatever that means) would probably help.
Grad schools dont have that much to go on. So things like grades/coursework and letters of rec mean a lot. Things like research are a plus as well.
it's just a award they hand out
the program i can get into is one where they do special lectures and let you connect with proffesors and that's a 90 cut off and that i'd like to keep
Ya that sounds good
yeah i think im pushing for 95 for bragging rights and it's stupid
I wouldnt do it for bragging rights but its good to be challenged. The preparation is good for grad school. Also it can help your application. Getting into grad school isnt everything (also your current grades still seem pretty good). I wouldnt push for 95 if you think it would have a big negative effect on your well being.
Profs at your uni may be able to give you advice.
Thank you
when I was applying last year, my research advisor suggested I ask my upcoming abstract algebra Prof for a letter of rec. it was similar in that many of the letters were due before or shortly after the final exam. he said to try and get to know him and do well on the first exam before floating the idea. impress him, you know?
I ended up doing extremely well on the exam, and went to office hours almost any time he had them, or at least once a week. eventually, the Prof offered to write letters for me and the other people I studied and came to office hours with.
not sure if it was the strongest letter possible, given that he didn't know me for that long or know 100% I would keep my very high A up until the very end (tho I did). but I got accepted somewhere so I guess it worked out 
What are some good schools that do analytic number theory? I'm thinking of applying to a graduate program even though I don't really have an undergraduate degree so it might seem something ridiculous to ask/to do, but I'm interested in what you guys say.
If that seems absurd thing to do then what are some good advices to start publishing meaningful papers? I'm not really familiar with the process of publishing. I heard that it's possible but why would you do it (it's very hard and painful in this society
)
Are you not in UG deltoid?
Undergrads in Math rarely have any meaningful publications so you shouldn't be too worried about that
That's also true
Are you suggesting applying before you finish your UG? Or like are you applying in your last year of UG (or something else)?
Consider both cases
Hmm well unless you're an exceptional student/have a very good reason for it, I don't think many grad programs would take your application too seriously if you're applying early tbh, so I don't think that's a good idea
Otherwise, you'd be better off doing as many nearing-graduate-level courses as possible; if there aren't enough offered at your uni then I guess supplement that with reading textbooks (or even then that's an option). As far as research goes, really the best you could hope for is something like an REU over the summer, but you can also ask around with profs at your uni/nearby unis if they would be able to take on students over the summer
I could definitely supplement them with textbooks
The thing is will they "believe"
My uni doesn't offer that much stuff
No analytic number theory, no algebraic geometry, no algebraic number theory etc
kevin ford at UIUC was one i encountered on my own searches, though idk about ANT generally
this has probably been asked a million times before but how do i ask my lecturer for a master's application reference?
i've been in regular contact with this lecturer who's supervising me for a small project, and he regularly gives me exercises to do on the spot
and i can't do them 💀
how do i ask for a reference when i'm evidently terrible at maths in front of him
Ask him if he would be able to write a 'strong' reference for you.
That lets you know whether he would be able to write a good reference for you or not, eliminating the need for you to speculate(whether you are 'terrible at maths in front of him' or not).
gulp
just the thought of saying that makes me nervous
but i'll try and slip that into a convo somehow, thanks
you shouldn't 'try to slip that into a convo' ask to meet about grad school and be up front
Hi, guys, when people apply for phd, how to target the unis where they have best chance of being admitted?
By talking to professors that know you well and are familiar with the graduate admissions
Thank you! But is there any other ways? because my professors suggest me to apply along the rank, but i am not sure which interval of the rank i have best chance
hi guys
Thank you!
Suppose I have never been to this professor's office hours, and have attended classes only like 10 times the entirety of the time they have been teaching me for 3 of my courses. Would it be reasonable to expect him to write good master's application LoR for me...?
I had high 90's in all my classes with him
No
What could they write?
"This student did well in my classes"
They can't say anything else
These kind of letters do not help
The people reading the applications are professors and they can see the subtext when all a letter mentions is that a student did well in classes and doesn't mention anything else
Well that is a problem because that was the prof I had the most interactions with throughout undergrad
what do you want to do in that year?
Haha I have no plans of doing that but I just wanted to hear anyones thoughts
@torpid temple it's true that not interacting with professors directly can make it harder for them to write for you, but sometimes it's okay. If you stand out in some way (write really well, came up with particularly interesting solutions to problems, etc), you can still get a good letter.
I'm not talking about solving open problems here, just something they were somewhat impressed by.
how will they know you did a thing without having some sort of closer relationship than going to class?
Through assignments
I mean, there were like 10 people in those classes, and the prof marks all our assignments and tests. What additional information about a student would the prof gain if the student regularly attended lectures...? Besides thinking the student is lazy af, and potentially feeling a bit spiteful.
Imma just email a few profs and see what happens :/
You should have atleast some relationship with a professor, more than just doing well in their class, for them to write a strong letter for you
Does submitting app earlier matter? I might not have the money for app fees before a month or two from now.
Some schools do rolling applications but generally it doesn't make a difference
How long does it take to submit a rec letter
As in to upload and not to write one cuz this guy wrote me one last year and this year it’s probably just gonna be a change of the date
like my advisor told me applying to 20 places isn’t considered too many these days 
I feel like 20 places are gonna take him like at least two hours just to click through
or is it actually much less time consuming than I thought
Uploading is not too time intensive
Hi, how hard is it to get into Bonn math master? My gpa scaled to German is somewhere around 2.2 and I’ve had challenging enough courses
Maybe some unis have some stupid form to fill or something. That's not unheard of before.
then it'll take some more time
if you're worried about this (so am I)
I'd recommend getting a preliminary list of schools you know for sure you are applying to
and sending the prof that list asap
and then later on if you add more, then tell them later
but not too many more
at least that's what I've been told, get them a good list early
can i ask if you had publications/preprints when applying?
thats good to know ty
Does anyone know in general how graduate schools feel about course withdrawels? I am a math major taking a physics class and am realizing i absolutely hate it and its taking too much time away from math and im not sure if im going to be able to do good in the class. there is still time for me to withdrawel from the class but im afraid it would look bad on my transcript. Any recommendations?
also sorry i if this is not the place to put this, i can delete and put it in dicussion if its bad here.
A withdrawal would be better than a bad grade
I can't imagine anybody would care...
thats what i think as well, but when i talked to some people irl about they said it would look terrible but i dont rly see why
who are the people saying this. and what is the context, where will you apply?
you're probably right. united states, and it was just some undergraduates in a math lounge, im guessing they just guessed?
It will be fine
bet 🤙
So, they probably have no clue. I do not work in the US, only time I have become weary was a guy that had begun like 20 different courses and not finished them. Why would anybody care about a few courses?
yeah
mm
i just realised
idk how graduate school works
and i might want to actually do that
well prolly for cs and not for maths but i assume the process is mostly similar
i mean i am just a sophomore in uni rn so i guess its early (?)
but
idk still worried
my uni offers an accelerated phd programme but idk if i wanna do that because my uni is uh
not great for pl theory
and idrk where i wanna go
and im just
completely lost
:despair:
any advice would be appreciated :>
What specific questions about doing a phd do you have
how to apply
and how to pick a school
im like
87% sure i want a phd?
i would much rather work in academia than industry
and a phd seems to help in that regard
but also big time investment so not entirely sure
i still have time to think it over ig
i guess reasons to want vs not want a phd would be nice too
to help assess if i actually want a phd or can get by with a masters or something
topics -> continent -> country -> schools/teams. You narrow it down one by one
this one varies a lot between schools and between countries
PhD is necessary, masters is useless
do i just search for like "grad schools good for pl theory" or something?
not if you want to do a Ph.D. where and M.Sc. is a prerequisite 🙂
In most of Europe yes, in the US I do not think so
that is one way to look at it.
im ignoring high tuition costs holy fuck its so expensive
and also like every other problem in american but i dont wanna talk politics
yoooooooooooooooooo
No
me when i ask questions and one of the responses is just "yoooooo"
Phds are funded
Does pl mean programming languages?
i know and yes
should I latex my research statement? should I have sections and blocks for theorems, or just paragraphs? should I have a citation?
No, paragraphs, no
Thanks!
idk why but it feels like my questions werent answered even though they were
i think its because i still feel confused but idk how to voice my concerns
idk
grad school apps are hard
:despair:
well you are a sophomore right now so that's a bit early to be anxious on grad school applications.
fair
idk
i still feel worried because like
im pretty sure i wanna do academia over industry
and you need a phd for that apparently
and
idrk what to expect or how to do that
Start from looking at reus?