#graduate-applications
1 messages Ā· Page 6 of 1
No I would not recommend this
Far more likely to lead to depression
For a reality check you should ask a faculty member you are close with
I think it's far more reasonable (albeit harder) to compare with experiences of people you know
For example, one of the people writing your letters of rec
such as this or actual grad students who got in; people in these websites might exaggerate or cherrypick their backgrounds
There are no such websites
for instance, all good unis in my country (šØš±) lie somewhere in that range and their apps certainly weren't tossed
Rankings are a scam
and expecting 4-5 accepted papers from an undergrad in math is just ridiculous, that's the kinda impression you get from reading these websites lol
this makes sense id guess profs would have a good knowledge of what it takes to get where and what would be realistic for particular students
they're barely even good as a rough measure to compare institutions; obviously a top 100 will be better than some uni in the 1000s but there's nothing wrong with e.g. not studying abroad if your country has a grad program with qualified faculty, exchange programs etc.
idk why but I haven't got such an extreme impression from said site
it's also easy to artificially boost QS rankings specifically, here's a video I watched the other day (about Chinese grad students really, but about half the video is about rankings) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQWlnTyOSig
also when people talk about coming from an "unknown university" I'd usually assume they don't even appear on international rankings
100-150 is defo far too high to worry about it
not that rankings mean anything it's just that they might be vaguely correlated with how known they are
I don't even know what QS is lmao
in that case I literally switched from a 100-150 to an "unknown uni" to do my masters smh
and I know a bunch of people from here that got into good US grad schools
If you don't know then don't worry about it
no one in application commitees cares about rankings lmao
I'm really not worried (especially as I'm already in grad school), I just get the feeling that some people are overly worried about it for sure
And I'm pretty sure the applications people will be fully aware that even if they haven't heard of the university the student can be very good
Mildly worried, one of my letter writer's has not submitted anything in a couple weeks
Email them!
If you're applying to top 10-20 schools, it's a good reality check for how strong many applicants are.
No itās not. There is no reality check, unless your reality is viewing response bias. There is nothing good about viewing such a site, and then not applying to a school because your grades or whatever donāt match up to other people who are applying with respect to that website
There will be strong applicants, and to a point youāll be able to recognize your limits and your strengths when youāre applying to grad schools
QS rankings don't matter.
https://www.topuniversities.com/universities/technion-israel-institute-technology
I won't name my uni but my uni has supposedly a ranking a lot better (also better under 'Mathematics'). My uni isn't even bad, but I don't know if I should even elaborate.
Technion by itself is sufficient to show these rankings are pure bullshit and are no measure of quality
There are also more 'objective' measures and how close you want to get to the top but then again I'm not sure if that by itself a healthy obsession. To me a mathematician should not obsess over (good/top/amazing/world-breaking) math paper submissions, but I am not a mathematician so I can't claim to know
When the university asks me to list professors I'd be interested in potentially working with, can I list associate professors or should I try to only list full professors?
I'm pretty sure you can also list assistant professors???
Associate professors are usually either tenured or tenure track so that should be fine
Some institutions don't let non-tenure/tenure track faculty advise students
I see
Either that or you risk being... advisorless, which has happened to some prominent people IIRC
You do not want to be advisorless
Associate professors are usually tenured I believe, but I'm shaky on the distinction between associate and full professors.
Yeah it's complicated and this distinction varies a lot by institution
I'm actually only going to list visiting professors as the ones I'm interested in working with because that seems like the best way to get into a school
Associate is fine
Assistant is what you want to be wary of
It can be hard to tel if theyāre actually tenure track or just a postdoc
Often if a school has a lot of post docs youāll notice a lot of ppl with āsome dudeās name assistant professorā
This is almost surely a postdoc
I know Michigan has one like this, Harvard does, at Columbia theyāre called Ritt Assistant Professors
Etc
usually

At Berkeley they are Morrey Assistant Visiting Professors if I remember correctly
Postdocs, that is
What do you mean "not applying"? Of course you still apply, the reality check is about your chances of getting in.
Then why check if you're applying anyway
To find out the competition in advance and get an idea before decisions actually come
It's a skewed perspective of the competition
It doesnāt do anything other than make you anxious and worry lol, and the arguably most important part of your application, your letters, are entirely absent from whatever ppl put down on these non-existent sites
I'm pretty certain that a lot of people posting their application details on the site we all know of inflate their numbers
such as some random undergrad with 15 graduate courses
I guess it is possible if someone has absolutely no life
Rude.
Sound mad you couldnt take 15 grad courses
why would I take 15 grad courses in undergrad lmao
that is quite a lot
basically would need to take only grad courses from the third year
i haven't really been shocked by the strength of profiles I've seen but maybe I have an overinflated view or something
[not just the forbidden sites but generally]
also if they're claiming 15 grad courses it could be that you get to "graduate-level" maths at that university p quickly, like they might have general topology as a grad course etc etc
I mean you are the exception
You have no lifeš¤£
I just only took math classes my sophomore and junior year
Im jk
ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
And at least at my school if u were serious about math you stopped taking UG math classes as soon as possible
Its really school dependent too. It harvard its super common to take grad classes.
Because they kinda were really bad compared to the grad alternative
Ya exactly
There was a sophomore in all of my classes
We had the same schedule except he was taking more classesš¤£
I mean talking to the ppl at my school from Harvard
Just to be precise, I'm talking about 1 thread with 200-300 responses every year and not a site. When you see people with multiple research experiences, lots of courses, and good grades + tests get rejected, it demonstrates just how competitive the process is in the 21st century. It's true letters are absent, but it can't be the case they all suck and were being pulled through the courses and research by the professors without doing original work themselves.
Im in cs
But ya ive heard that too
Youre supposed to pass quals immediately and then the courses dont matter
The theoretical cs classes are probably a bit tougher and are taught by faculty
you also get people with the absolute bare basics coursework-wise (not to be rude to them) also get into good programs
(again not to be rude) I was surprised some only had what is <=2nd yr courses over here
This is a pretty different situation in different institutions
Here I haven't seen undergrads in classes beyond grad first year real/complex/algebra
A lot of grad school admissions is luck
where I did undergrad it was also similar
i'd be interested to actually read my SoPs
Ya lucky by how smart god made you
Hope that the decision fatigue works out in your favor
xd I'm bad at detecting sarcasm
It is a ton of luck
Its hard to detect sarcasm through textš¤£
do not post screenshots from that website
That person applied to schools where the operator alg ppl are dinosaurs
Ofc they didnāt get in lol
in fact, just refrain from talking about that website
Free speech!
which schools?
UCLA and berkley
Oof
I said I'd also be interested in nonabelian combinatorics
Oh interesting
Would you do additive combinatorics?
Is this using like harmonic analysis or whatever
Or non commutative harmonic analysis lol
yeah abstract/noncomm harmonic analysis as far as I understand
I see a lot of additive combinatorics published in GAFA which is somewhat confusing to me.
Thatās pretty cool
probably because of the ties to harmonic analysis
idk if I'd actually go to Berkeley because Voicelescu is 73
Yeah he and rieffel are too old
Rieffel is the advisor of my undergrad advisors advisor
He is like my academic great grand father in a way
Lol
Voic said yes though, which is weird cos people younger than him have warned against
idk Berkeley is kind of a crapshoot overall
Absolutely true. I know one person going into a top 10 school for number theory/algebra who had only the basic upper undergraduate courses like linear algebra, real analysis, abstract algebra, and field theory. Publishing a number theory paper, being a TA, and (presumably) having great recommendations lifted her application.
and I'm not so sure on the additive combinatorics stuff since I've never done it before, just done some noncom harmonic
i wish i could go to berkeley
right i had these top schools without like, many C* ppl on my list
it'd be cooler if I got into princeton
but I'm not going to get into princeton
oh how do u feel about like math phys btw
i wish i could study under frenkel
and I might do some applications to QM as part of my project (on computational spectral stuff)
john, did you know that we share a name?
kind of justifying a lot of terminology like state and what not
If that's a rule, can you add it to #rules so people know?
oh that looks nice
Read pins
anyway
I don't see anything about it in pins
i think it would be cool if one of you guys could mentor me
my name isnt actually john u know lol
yeah definitely not an isolated case either
it confuse(d/s) me
ig if they have a publication that's ++++ but othw idk
i really want to be able to publish a paper in undergrad
wait
fuck
i thought this was discussion
i just clicked on the starred post or whatever
Anyways, that website is a very toxic place, and this decision is final. If you want to discuss this further you can DM @jaunty pewter
maybe i should apply to princeton for the math phys
hmm
what program in princeton are u applying for @tepid forum
maths
but I kind of fudged the personal statement, I substituted in a wrong paragraph which mentioned operator algebras
and i don't think Naor does operator algebras
big F
oof
I did talk about Naor's interests though
it was just one sentence which said that, which I had just copied from another app, which was a bit annoying
i see, thats probably not a big deal
it's a crapshoot anyway, I really nailed down my Illinois and A&M statements
and will do so with my oxf one too though i think that's less important
anyone applying to UCLA? Where are you supposed to submit your list of courses taken?
do they want a full list submitted under "supporting documents" or do they just want you to list them in that weird section where you can only list 5 courses
Anyone into geometric analysis here?
CMU has their application through mathprograms.org?
On the subject of Berkeley/UC unis, it's looking like the pay there will go up significantly over the next couple of years
I hear mixed things about Caltech living costs
Someone once told me that Caltech was fine if you live an hour off campus
Which like what's the point
For someone from places with low costs of living, So Cal rents will be eye watering
UIUC stipend is low but I assume CoL is cheaper there
Yes
I don't think Berkeley does
It's quite cheap
My rent for a 2 bedroom next year is 700 a month
Perks of middle of nowhere: cheap rent
Congratuallationalah, the grad strike worked
I believe UC Village is cheaper than usual (and I believe you need to be married to be eligible to live there). But otherwise not the case - I pay $1400 a month in Berkeley-owned housing.
Itās not for sure yet, and there are still areas that are massively lacking (childcare and NRST particularly), but itās looking good on the wages front.
UC Village is also relatively far
Yeah
None of the other housing is subsidised- and thereās also a either regent policy or state law that disallows subsidised housing from the UCās part.
And UC village isnāt technically subsidised
Itās just the entire area is owned by UC so they own the entire market
That's not bad leaves about 12k for other expenses
I assume you need a car too
Yes, supplement 1
Or a roommate / friend with a car
I already submitted, but I checked my application proof and it's the last 2 pages of the proof
I already have one luckily cause I go to school in the middle of nowhere hours from where I live lol
Nice
I only use my car to get groceries
On campus bus is good enough for everything else
Nice
I will say I don't know anything about the grad math community
I know a ton of CS grad students and they seem tightknit and they're super nice
The math grad students here seem more closed but also I'm an undergrad
Yeah I'm just super interested in Balogh and Ford
And the only reason I know CS grad students is I TA CS courses
Ford is super cool
Balogh is scary in seminars
The grad students at my school are pretty closed off until you get to know them
I feel so bad for the presenters
He grills them so hard š
Also his intro grad combo course looks quite rough
But I wanna take it next fall
Balogh is clearly brilliant though
I mean I'd prefer roommates
I get lonely lol
But that's interesting about Caltech
Maybe I will look at California for grad school
in NYC, in our housing if you have roommates it's like 1.4k a month
š
and this is in Manhattan so, I imagine shared housing eve in CA is like 1.5k max
I looked at UCSD but I couldn't quite work out how much the math stipend was
I feel like you won't have a good idea of wht UC stipends are until these strikes end
and the bargaining finishes
Well the main issue for me was there's TA, reader, and tutor. TA gets 46k annually, tutor 34k, and reader 28k
I think the big problem is the "if", different departments pay differently
What's reader?
I'm pretty sure grad students all TA
Like what's reader vs TA
Graduate students in the Department of Mathematics are typically employed in one of the following roles: Reader/Grader Teaching Assistant (TA)/Instructional Assistant (IA) Graduate Student Researcher (GSR) Less commonly, a student may be employed as an Associate-In (AI)
My plan is take the car places where it wouldn't be a hassle get rid of it if it would be a hassle
No idea how I'll move my PC without the car though
Yeah I reckon that's the only way
I've heard your advisor can't pay you if you have a TA stipend
Like you get one or the other
Yeah I've heard of the grants things in other fields my friend is a grad student our engineering department and he gets double cause his professor matched his stipend to bring him back they have a big military grant though
Our stipend is small though since he's a master's student
It will depend on if you're a TA vs reader/tutor vs SR
I will say the bargaining is shaping up to be close to finishing
So reader/tutor figures I don't know much of - they are paid hourly
Pre top-up it's shaping up to be about $35k for a 9/10 month TA appointment
But that's from Oct 2024
It will go up to that over the next couple of years
(currently pre top-up at UC unis is about 23.5k for a 9/10 month TA appointment)
In many fields your advisor pays for your stipend or splits it with the university depending on teaching requirements unless you have outside funding (like nsf grfp or some other fellowship). For instance, starting next year my advisor will be funding me.
Ah I'm pretty sure ours are just in a department pool pretty much since it's 10k or so
I am currently a CS senior, with a full time job offer as a SWE, but i really do want to get my masters in CS primarily (not SWE since i like math š ), and also my teacher said i should consider getting a PhD since i would be a good fit. how often do people go for a PhD after working? or do you think i can work and go to night school?
In my cohort there are many people that worked before starting a PhD. @lusty crater
It's very often in CS. In fact, I know few people who did his Bachelor's in Linguistics and then PhD in CS from CMU. His job experience really helped him
Is there still opportunity for research in cs
I think I would like research but I am not creative enough to think of research and also I donāt think Iād be able to find a job near where I live
no computing is entirely solved
you can tell this by the fact that there's a general procedure to find the most efficient way to solve any problem and that all technology works flawlessly
and by the fact that there were 67775 cs papers submitted to arXiv this year
(as a serious answer, yes there is still opportunity for research in cs, it is relatively common for people to go for a PhD after working)
also if you do a PhD your advisor will help you find research topics.
also you'll need to remember that P = 0 or N = 1
Shaking my smh my head, why doesn't everyone just run Hutter search and turn the constant factor into small potatoes for large n?
oh well of course, only if there is a proof of p
Imagine getting into grad school without 5 first author papers
Im first author on all my papersš
are first authors a thing in maths? i thought authors were often listed in alphabetical order
Doesnt matter tho since math papers are alphabetical lol
ya
Im changing my last name to Aaron. Ill always be first author!
Aaron Aaronovitch
I wanna get an erdƶs number
Ya its not too hard to get a pretty low erdos number in math/theoretical cs.
I wonder what my Erdos number is
There is some website thatll calculate it for you
You just have to input your coauthors.
Oh mine is 5, neat
mathscinet has a calculator
yea just found it, that's what I used
Mine is 3š
3 is not impressive considering my papers are in extremal combinatorics.
2 is very cool
Prob possible
Im pretty sure he has papers that were published after his death
Finished by his coauthors
Just get on one
posthumous papers
5 seems reasonable for me
Since technically the professor I work in is in control theory
So that's a bit away from pure math anyways so gotta take some steps to get to math
I can loan you a shovel.
Apparently Duke let's you submit the GRE subject test score only if you also submit the general GRE
anyone here applying to IU bloomington by chance?
1: why
2: I like this channel for REU app questions š„²
however if this becomes like site-that-shall-not-be-named then yea kill it
Why two weeks?
Most decisions come out in March
You can mute the channel on your end if you want to ignore it
ppl are asking about reu appa in here?
Some people have
Does reu appa fall under this channel though?
that's what im asking
my involvement with this channel and its creation has been nil so
ill be back
lol
How useful are theoretical computer science courses while applying for graduate programs in mathematics? The CS department at my university (which also happens to be fairly well known for theoretical computer science) offers some pretty nice and interesting courses that are basically proof-based math courses. But I don't know how CS courses are viewed by math departments across the world, and it would be a shame if the prevalent practice was for admission committees to look at CS courses and automatically assume that they weren't mathematically rigorous. Another issue with the whole thing is that I doubt that any math department outside my home country has ever heard of my institution. In which case it seems to be even more risky to take CS courses in place of (equally rigorous)math courses.
What sort of math do you want to do
As of now my interests seem to lie mainly in combinatorics and number theory, but that could change because I am yet to take abstract algebra, real analysis and topology (I'm 3/8th through my undergrad degree)
I also found set theory and computability theory quite interesting.
I have been spamming this channel with REU apps questions lol
I mean you may do what I'm doing
and just become deeply interested in a mix
As in?
uhhhh
algorithms and complexity can get quite mathematical
numerical algorithms seems like a big thing
alot of math people seem to dig type theory and proof automation and programming language theory
formal logic has it's place in stuff like program checkers / verification
stuff like that
Applying to theoretical computer science programs as a math major would be an extremely difficult uphill battle though, right?
I neither have the space (in terms of course slots) nor the desire to make CS my main 'thing'. But as an undergraduate, I believe it would do me good to 'explore' different sorts of interesting math.
I am also not interested in Systems or AI/ML, so if coursework in those areas of computer science is a requirement(explicit or implicit) while applying to CS theory programs, then I would not go out of the way to fill my undergraduate transcript with them rather than doing math.
I know multiple CS theory people who only did math majors in undergrad
not sure about the requirement of systems and AI/ML and such
I doubt that's the case
I mean I'm only taking CS theory classes
no interest in systems and such
I see, that's nice to hear.
my understanding is that CS phd programs don't really have course requirements to get in?
Implicit ones, rather than explicit?
Never heard of this
I see, thanks
Like the last programming course I did was a data structures course in freshman year
I can program, I just don't like to lol
I just take algorithms courses
(in addition to my math courses)
and I think it'll be fine? I haven't heard anything to the contrary
Although my question was mainly about how theoretical CS courses are viewed by math departments(i.e. would they be viewed as equivalent to proof based math courses)
Not really about the feasibility of switching my interests and applications towards the CS side
It does make perfect sense, yes
I assume you are an undergraduate?
ya
Which year are you in?
Junior
Oh ok
To give a concrete example, let's say I take a CS course called 'Computational Number Theory', which at my university is taken by a renowned professor in the field, and is heavily mathematical. When I apply to math grad schools though, they have neither an incentive nor evidence to believe that the course was indeed taught in a manner that any other proper math course was taught.
And from the perspective of optimizing grad school admits(sounds terrible, I know, but there is no other way to put it), I might be at a nonzero disadvantage when compared to a copy of me who took a similarly high level math department course in place of it.
Afaik a large amount of TCS people have a strong math background usually either a double major, a minor, or a straight up math degree
Yeah, my plan for graduate studies is to go into theoretical computer science in either computational complexity theory or algorithm design (or a mix of the two), and it seems as though having a strong mathematical background is very useful in that regard
As a phd student in tcs most of the time i wish i knew more math than more cs.
Same, Same
Although it is nice sometimes when programming is needed, for what it's worth being able to quickly bang something out in Coq or implement somebody's algorithm in pythong is useful š š
But the programming "method" of teaching and learning is terrible, I've learned much more from e.g., the math flavored textbook klienberg & tardos than I have from a programming prof
maybe. but if you have solid math coursework, then taking tcs courses wont hurt. Ik people that got into very good math and cs phd programs.
one of the CS grad students I know is basically only taking a bunch of math courses here at UIUC
I get that, but even the slightest risk taken by someone at an unknown institution means instant rejection. As far as my interests are concerned, they are (as of now) not leaning towards anything that could specifically be considered CS rather than math.
Is there a reason you are optimizing for grad school admissions instead of maximizing learning
I dont think thats true but ok.
I dont think taking some theoretical computer science courses will cause you to get instantly rejected. Many math students have taken courses in other areas like theoretical physics or cs.
I am not, I was asking about the future. And I meant to ask about choosing between courses in the event that both of them are equally appealing but one is math and the other is CS.
I didn't mean to say that I would take an easier/more basic/less interesting math course when i can take a nicer cs one
I dont think taking a course that is basically a math course but offered in cs will have a negative affect on your app.
Right, but those people must be very strong applicants already, such that they have the luxury to not think about what admission committees might think.
I dont believe that is true but ok. Do what you want.
Dont ask questions if you just completely disregard the answer.
I meant to ask about a 'marginal' negative effect as compared to a situation where a math course is taken.
Sorry for coming across as stubborn/fixated on my own opinion
Ya i understand, i dont think taking a math course instead of a tcs course will negatively affect your app as long as you have solid coursework in analysis, algebra and whatever your main interest is.
Didn't mean to come across that way, or to imply that you are 'wrong' and that I know it all.
Does make sense, yes. Thanks
idk anyone who has done this
wouldn't be surprised if this could happen
Although lemme add that I know basically 0 math graduate students here
they seem very hard to get to know
the CS grad students seem much more open
hence I know more CS students who did math undergrad than vice versa
All the schools I'm applying to keep asking things like "have you ever been placed on probation by the school or received disciplinary action for violating school rules", and it sucks, because I got in trouble my first semester of my first year for underage alcohol consumption and haven't been caught since then (at least until I turned 21).
Will this hurt me significantly?
Is it on record
Wow actually getting caughtā¦
Maybe? I think so?
You can use some of your personal statement to explain what happened
i remember i applied last cycle and dartmouth asked me if i got suspended in high school (i did twice, but obviously got myself into check when i was a teenager)
that shit fucked me up
lmao
why would they ask that
speaking of last years apps
really still hopeful rutgers accepts me for fall '22
the semester starts in -4 months so hopefully they get back to me soon
If an REU says they just want a "short statement"
is that more along the lines of a personal statement, or a research statement?
I have both written which is why I'm asking
Do they say what they want from the statement
No
Lol rip
In cases where the nature of the statement is not specified, is it not wiser to go with a research statement? Kindly correct me if I am wrong.
As someone who got rejected by all REUs (twice), one summer I took classes and another summer I took classes and did a reading course
The only thing that saved me from getting rejected by all REUs a third time was Covid
do you have any advice for REUs? Like what would you have done differently, or what do you think was your weakness?
If its not on record then I wouldn't mention it at all. If you have to, then I think as ange said, spend a little of your personal statement explaining that
My weakness was not being one of the top 5 students in my year at my undergrad
Also not having any famous letter writers
Maybe Iām being a bit cynical here
Seems pretty reasonable to me.
In order to get into a university for grad school, one needs to have letter writers who know the admission committee personally right?
Wat
Grad school is definitely less competitive than REUs are
Why
Just think about how many grad students are admitted each cycle versus how many people get into reus
There are not that many reus, and they are generally small
Does it reduce the applicant pool by that much
Most of my cohort is not international
No
This is just wrong.
There are 50k math majors in the U.S. and 600 summer REU spots. Even if just 5% of math majors are applying to REUs, that's a lot of competition.
It depends on the REU. You definitely dont need to be a ātop 5ā student to get into an REU.
Maybe the REUs like duluth, uchicago, small, UVA
I didn't apply to any of those
Maybe their college sucks, so it's top 5 or nothing. Top 5 in a top 50 university is good enough, but top 5 at University of Alabama is the bare minimum. Absolute strengths is a better question: courses, grades, any awards or competitions. At my REU there were a few people who didn't know what a group was, they must've got in with impressive accomplishments outside math courses.
I was at Berkeley
That makes a bit more sense a lot of REUs try to give opportunities to people at lesser known places or w less opportunities.
Were you taking lots of tough undergraduate and grad courses? Any awards? Did you interact with professors outside class frequently and use those for recommendations? Without prior research, that's all you have for the application.
my ug school was ranked 136 and a decent number of kids got into REUs.
Yes, good coursework, good grades in those classes, no awards, good professor interaction
Did you get feedback on statement of purpose and CV? Besides transcript, recommendations, and prior research experience, that's all there is.
Yes I did
Ok like whatever
I got into grad school without issue
I just had really bad luck with reus for some reason
just my own personal anecdote: i went to a small school, had good rec letters and grades, didnāt get into any REUs, but got into a handful of top 50 PhD programs, if that sheds any insight on the competitiveness of REUs
Ya there is a lot of noise in REU admissions.
None of them ever bothered to reject me
Ya REUs ghost many people
You still mad over REUs when youre in a PhD program
But the people who got into reus from my undergrad were those who would be considered top 5
Ya that may be what it takes when youre at a top school.
If REUs only accept students from elite schools they will likely lose their NSF support.
Once again ^^^
REUs arent made for kids at top schools to just gain a bigger advantageš¤£
In practice im pretty sure duluth lost their nsf support
Uchicago too maybe
But ya they arent supposed to
Alright, that's outright bad luck. When I got rejected from all freshman year, 7 of 8 sent a rejection. Nothing you can do there, you definitely don't suck so much for that to happen intentionally. Without talking to you in person, I can speculate on the recommendations. Maybe the professors said you were just good and didn't show excellence, recommendations which imply a student can get all As but don't convey an air of potential outside classes are a death knell. As I see it, there's problem solving, class participation, and class size aspects to recommendations from courses. If you solved almost all the homework on your own, and was getting As before a curve or something that shows performance beyond an A not captured in just the letter grade, that's one good sign. If your professor engaged students during class about the next step or what should be done here and you knew the answer, frequently giving it is another good sign. If all your upper undergraduate and graduate courses are still huge classes where it's harder for professors to know you, that's a bad sign. Any given school is bad luck but to be rejected from 10+ REUs 2 years in a row with what you claim shows the bad luck is somewhere in your application, and it can only be the recommendations. I assume you had a professor look over statement of purpose and CV so nothing there sticks out as negative and possibly decision tilting.
Given you're in grad school, becoming "better" (however you want to see it) than the students who got into those REUs with respect to research output, conferences, and talks can make you forget about it and wash away the salt. Just don't get too carried away.
Yale said less than half of the REU participants will come from Yale
Uchicago is a shit REU when it comes to doing research since most students do survey papers on what is already known. I don't know whether this was a factor for the NSF.
Its a respected program though. The survey papers are of really high quality from what Iāve heard.
Ya its a good program
The surveys probably end up being a lot more useful than more original reu research that ends up in a garbage journal.
https://www.epfl.ch/labs/erg/young-researchers-in-mathematics-program/
Anyone know anything about this?
Summer 2022, July 11 to July 17 The Bernoulli Center for Fundamental Studies is a world-renowned research institute located in Lausanne, Switzerland, facilitating research, outreach, and education in mathematics and the mathematical sciences. The Young Researchers in Mathematics Program is a new and exciting summer research program hosted by the...
i.e. is it going to happen this year?
This site says 2023 apps will open soon but then other places say the center is still under construction or something? idk
probably but doing a survey sounds less interesting
at least on the surface
I've never written a proper survey so idk
I guess its less exciting
Yea but also I guess it is only 10 weeks or so
idk what research you can really do in that time
UChicago REU stipend information and housing information is vague though, I'll apply because it's no cost but it doesn't seem super promising
What doesnt seem promising?
The level of support doesn't seem promising (compared to other REUs) I'm not really sure what they mean in the statement about housing if it's provided or if it's out of pocket since assistance is so vague
The program itself seems cool though
I guess since it's mainly for their own students and doesn't have outside funding currently it's not too crazy
I thought it was NSF funded?
"The program has no promised federal support, and any that might later be
received will be limited to U.S. citizens and permanent residents"
Ah
when do decisions from graduate programs typically come back? i applied as soon as the school opened theirs and havnt heard anything at all
@chilly turret could be early as Feb but typically March-May
okay so thereās no need to stress for not knowing anything now?
definitely not May
the deadline to accept offers officially is April 15th
I think there's special cases where you can skirt around this, but that's the agreed-upon date by like virtually all US schools
in math at least
yes, it's way too early. I heard my earliest decisions like right at the start of Feb
or maybe like Jan 30
okay
A lot of people hear back by feb to late March
and do they typically want the official gre score before making a decision, or do you just send one after they make an offer for them to verify you told the truth on your application
If that's part of the requirement for your application, you should be sneding that now
i sent it like on december 3rd and the money from ets cleared, but it still hasnāt been updated on my application
they said it would only take like 3-5 days since i did it online but
This is one of the reasons I didnāt go there. No stipend is an absolute killer to diversity in your program
(Ended up very happy with that decision for other reasons as well, but at the time that was the deciding factor)
im too poor to go to an REU with no stipend ā ļø , not like I could get into Duluth anyways
I think I'll apply to the REU at U-Michigan Anne-Arbor as my safety. I know somebody in my year who got in and they had much less qualifications than I currently do. It seems decent and has a $4800 stipend. I could also apply to the REU at my own university but it has a highly statistical bent and I'm more into pure math. Took two classes in mathematical statistics at my school at the undergrad level and if that's what undergrad stats is then I never want to do it again, just not interesting the way it's approached. Good to know about the library thing though, I'll keep that option in mind also
.
I got offered a summer research position but had to decline because I live 4 hours away and I'm too broke to get a place down there right now
The professors from the master's level classes I took (not that it means much, these classes could honestly pass off for upper level undergrad at higher ranking schools) seem to like me, particularly the manifolds one so doing a summer independent reading with them is an option. Plus I made great grades in these classes.
UHHHH
ok so
the CMU deadline is in 2 hours
I submitted my application
but it says it's incomplete since I haven't uploaded language proficiency test scores
but I'm a native English speaker so they shouldn't be required...
what do I do...
do I literally just upload a blank page that says "I am a native English speaker but your form requires this document"
hmmm sure lol. Maybe you misclicked somewhere in the form and wrote that you weren't a native english speaker too? But I'd start off by doing the thing you suggested and only then going through the time consuming process of double checking what you put
it's through mathprograms.org so there's not really any place to misclick
oh that's weird then
welp if somebody within the next 2 hours comes up with a better idea do that but for now your idea seems good enough given the time constraints
I assume I'm not the only one with this issue
no
the form literally will not let me
Oh if it's my own uni I can easily afford it considering I live at home 10 minutes away from it
Anyways the guy I'm thinking of didn't even have real analysis back then so maybe it's not 100% but it can't be that competitive š¤·āāļø
meanwhile if I'm lucky enough to not burn out I'll have completed some qual sequences at my school by the time summer starts (though again, these would be upper level undergrad at higher ranking institutions :s)
yeah my manifolds professor actually suggested I join in on an independent reading with 2 2nd year grad students about Heegard Floer homologies (not that I remotely know what that means) next term. I'm a bit hesitant though since he said it'd be fast paced and we'd be black-boxing a lot, but I guess I'm always allowed to take the independent reading class pass-fail
I tried to do some research on it but I don't even know what a homology is yet lol, that comes next term =.=
O_o
You should try to just sit in without registering or something
But trying to do Floer homology without knowing homology isā¦
o_O
Yeeeeah
I thought the same thing
I'll either learn it in my algebraic topology class or abstract algebra class next term so maybe it'd make better for a summer reading
Anyways I have 2 alternative options for an independent reading next term and I figure I should do something since I'm already a junior with no research experience yet. Either something lightweight in cryptography (book he recommended doesn't even assume knowledge of linear algebra) and with a professor emeritus who's functionally retired so he'd have all the time in the world to help me out if I get stuck, or just taking this Riemann geometry class as an independent reading that was being offered but I couldn't take due to a time conflict with this measure theory class I'm taking. I don't feel like the latter would really count as an independent reading class though, and it might honestly be taking on too much given the current classes I'm signed up for
My final alternative is to just not do any independent reading and take a class on C since I low key feel like that'll be more valuable than any math class I take lol
realistically I probably won't attain anything in academia after my PhD so I figure I should be able to code at least at the level of a CS minor, and the CS program at my school has waaaay higher merit imo (although it's still not top ranked or anything)
UChicago admits people from non-top schools for their REU
Not 100% sure why they lost their funding though
I think it might be because they don't have dedicated research projects
And are largely focused on learning new math
Ok, thanks
Applying to masterās programs now - still hoping some are open
A bit late to start now
Yeah I kinda realize lol
Plan was to get a job for a year and then go for a masters but everything is freezing up job wise
Thanks
Is it not? As far as I have heard most companies have big problems finding people.
Most US tech companies have been doing big layoffs
10k at amazon, 10k at facebook, etc...
Ok, yes that is probably true, the positions I was thinking of are probably more SWE+something more, more like RSE
What's "RSE"?
Research Software Engineer
Hi
Is it generally seen as a bad thing for applying to phd programmes if you took a gap year before/after masters
no
hi, I want to ask do math programs accept students in spring? I don't really have any specific place I want to apply to so I only Googled several random schools and it seems like they only accept students in the fall. I'm asking this because I made some poor judgements delaying my cs courses and it may cause me to delay my graduation by a semester.
In the US at least it seems to be the norm for math programs to only have one admission season per year.
oh :(((
I'm not tooo happy about it cuz I'll only have that one cs course to do during that semester
so it's like, wasting an entire year in some sense
One could hypothetically strengthen their applications quite a bit in terms of research experience during that time, especially if the course load is very small.
A lot of schools either don't admit or admit 1-2 students in the spring
that's a fair point. I'm not entirely sure what "research experience" mean though, it doesn't feel like the professors in my institution encourage it(I'm not saying that in a bad way). I've been talking to one of my profs regularly and been coming up with questions about measure theory and I kind of feel like that's hard enough for me
ok, that's good to know
I mean that's not good, but ty
and also, 90% of the professors here are visiting professors and they're only here for a semester or so, and then they go back to their home institution. so it's kind of hard to form a relationship with them/find something valuable to talk to them about, in some sense
To be honest, I don't have a concrete idea of what "research experience" is either, since I have none myself. But it is one of the best things someone applying to grad school can have, as it can lead to strong letters of recommendation (in general much stronger than those that are a result of simply doing well in a course or two under a professor), as well as publications.
I guess that if the professor in question can attest to your capabilities by making reference to the effort you made towards the problems you explored, it would be favourable for your application.
tbh rec letters is partly the reasons I started talking to one of my profs regularly, because even though I always wanted to talk to people more I feel like I'm saying stupid things and I just don't go to their office hours lol
yeah, thank you for your response
it just feels like there's some kind of stigma around delaying graduation and stuff like that
I guess you could try contacting professors outside your institution then?
I have no idea how to do that, and I doubt I have anything valuable to say tbh
It is a common practice where I am from to mail around 100-200 professors from various places, whose interests match one's own even vaguely.
This makes it likely to get at least one response.
For people who have decided on their interests already, this would be much less applicable I guess.
sorry could you explain what's the purpose? Do you mean like asking to possibly be their PhD students?
yeah that's what I thought
rn I think I enjoy real analysis the most, but I got the highest grade in real analysis so far, so I'm certainly biased. And I'm 3rd year so I have only done limited courses
No, short term projects. But then, I am in the second year of my undergraduate studies right now, so this bit may not be that helpful for someone who is this close to graduation. Apologies.
I've actually never heard of that
Oh, that seems to be more than enough time for this then.
You will be applying next year right?
it might be a cultural thing. Might be professors here think our courses are enough for us to handle, no need to give us anything else to look forward to
yes ideally
That could be the case
thank you for the advice š
welcome
Make sure you write a good thoughtful email. Profs complain about getting generic emails obviously sent to many profs. This will get you rejected.
Yes, of course. I believe mentioning specific reasons for interest in their work, and one's level of background should be sufficient for a first email?
what jobs are there for a masters in CS other than software engineer
same for PhD, I would love to teach but life isnāt going to allow me to go round the country to teach, but Iād like to climb the ladder and maybe do remote research. I also donāt want to go for it and just hope I have a job
There's e.g. security research and project management. Public agencies who don't employ developers of their own need people to write requirements documents and try to prevent vendors from being useless money sinks.
software engineering is a broad broad title
could range from dev ops / infra to just coding
There's architecture too -- but you'll generally need to prove yourself by writing some actual code before someone will pay you just to be an architect.
I know software engineer is a broad title, but itās still all the same thing in broad reality
I just think in 5 years Iāll hate being a code monkey
So far Iāve liked it for 6 years but eventually everything fades out
oops sorry @half meadow
But I was thinking research is going to be changing what you research every so often that itāll be refreshing
But also itās a tough field to get into since you require schooling
Maybe masters with an focus in ml/ai?
But i feel in 2 years itāll be overflowing with people
In all the companies I've worked for, "software engineer" has covered a whole spectrum of roles, from "code monkey" to "autonomously figures out there's a problem worth solving, then formulates a solution plan and rallies managers and other engineers to go implement it".
fair enough
Iām just scared this area is going to lose my interest and I donāt enjoy my job in the future
But for now the job I have I am happy
theres a high chance that you have to do the same specific research for 3+ years during PhD tho
esp PhD programs where the money comes from a specific funded project
ok
someone pick 5 schools for AG sub top30/20 and located in cities
nice cities too
walkable
Anyone has any funded master recommendation in Europe? I'll probably apply just for one, but let's see maybe there's something interesting I'm unaware of
Any programme that's oriented towards geometry, topology and analysis (GTA) is fine
See the masters program at Muenster
This one is really cool actually.
you wouldn't happen to know other universities in europe with a operator algebra/fa specialization would you?
Oxford, Glasgow, Lancaster, Nottingham, Newcastle. Leeds and KCL have more spectral theory like stuff. And there's someone at Durham doing more computational spectral stuff (Sabine boegli)
I don't know how their masters programs are but defo for PhD
theres a big group in prague
Sweet , thank you ā¤ļø
yo guys so
penn state wants junior/senior gpa
here is the issue
i am graduating in the 3rd year
so i guess should i just do my junior year or also add in my sophomore year to the calc
oof
(the penn state people are away for break until after the deadline oops)
add your 60-70 credit hour GPA and 90-110
Since you are graduating early you still have those grades
Has anyone here ever switched from a math to a CS PhD or vice versa while in grad school
Like that's usually a very different department so I imagine it's harder than switching advisors.
Ya thats definitely harder than switching advisor
Ik a math phd student that is advised by two cs faculty
oh interesting
how does that work?
Some grad students told me that I should have my advisor be in my department when I apply to grad school
it doesn't sound like something you should go in intending to do
I dont think she intended to do this
I guess she was just interested in the work they do so asked if she can be advised by them
are these CS profs their primary advisors?
yea I'm not, hence the question about switching because I still can't decide what I want to go into
Also what situations should someone get a masters before applying to PHD programs? I'm debating doing a masters in math before applying to PHD but I feel that maybe I would have a strong app just out of undergrad which is why I am asking.
Yes
Yes
math and cs are very close depending on the field
Yea the areas of CS I'm looking at are extremely close to math
Ya they are
What are the REUs that have funding and accepts international students?
Whatās this channel about
masters & phd applications
In the UK at least, it is possible to attend something called a Centre for Doctoral Training (CDT) in which you undertake general training/broadening courses in your first year (more or less equivalent to a Master's) and then you work on your PhD research for the rest of your project. That's what I'm doing for my PhD
Has anyone had experience with studying abroad for a graduate program as an American, and if so, would you recommend it? I'm sort of wanting to get out of my comfort zone, but I'm not sure if moving away to another country is the way to do that. I'm definitely wanting to leave my city and maybe my home state for this though. Any advice is appreciated
it might be interesting and definitely could be a good choice if you find the right program, but keep in mind that
- most graduate programs outside the US want you to get a masters first, and will probably not fund you as much for that. in the US you can apply straight to PhD programs in most cases, and then you will be funded
- grad school is already gonna be a big step outside your comfort zone in many ways, having to adjust to a new country / language in the middle of that might be a lot.
but i do know someone who did it for a funded program, and he's having a good time
Oh yeah, that makes sense. With it being a graduate program, I probably won't be able to do as much exploration than if I was just traveling just as a vacation, which is the main reason I was curious. Thanks
In grad school applications in the US, letters of recommendation from professors unknown to people on the admission committee are disregarded in general, right?
I donāt think theyāre disregarded
But it surely isnāt as great as Iād like Jacob Lurie wrote it
Hmm right. So unless one can expect someone of this level of notability to write a letter, one should in general expect to be rejected right?

Bruh no
Bruh
A lot of people get accepted from my uni whose only letter writers are from my uni and no one at my uni is famous
Yeah, āfamousā doesnāt mean anything unless that professor has some connection with you. Let alone that, I would much rather take a letter from someone who knows me
this would more or less mean most/all the recommendation letters of most of the applicants to a given program would be disregarded
so it seems like an "obviously not" : p
Right, it would make sense that letters from professors who know you personally would be stronger.
Hmm, graduate applications are quite competitive.
Getting letters from professors who know you well is more important than getting letters from famous people
That goes both ways. An institution with a policy of only admitting graduate students who are already known by famous researchers would be losing out on a majority of the best applicants.
Also keep in mind that math is a small world. What matters more than fame is how well the admissions committee knows your letter writer. A famous person will definitely be known by the committee but the converse is not true
And as people have said they're not going to disregard a letter just because they don't know the person
Don't discount what the letter says either. If you apply for a set-theory PhD with a letter from Saharon Shelah saying roughly "um, yeah, this person is an undergrad here, and I'm told they mostly hand in their homework on time", then that's gonna be binned pretty fast.
Yeah definitely
And that's a good example to because (I assume) all the working set theorists who have enough experience in the field to get tenure somewhere good pretty much all know each other anyways
I've heard it's like that in model theory at least
So yeah everyone will know Shelah but also they'll know the set theorist who actually knows you
Also this is why you always ask "can you write me a good letter" instead of "can you write me a letter." The letter writer themself is going to know best whether they know you well enough and are known well enough to write a good enough letter for the places you're applying to.
oh so if I was interested in Europe
I should get a masters in math first?
I would actually push against that. As a grad student you do have a lot of flexibility with how you spend your time, and especially post-covid, where you spend it.
also tbh if you're living there, that's a totally different "exploration" than a 1 week vacation
Europe is a great place to be if you want to travel around a lot, it's cheap by train and hostel / airbnb (personally i've been amazed by how cheap airbnb's are for single rooms in very nice apartments in awesome neighborhoods in europe)
exactly
yea I'm looking at going to France for spring break with some friends and the air bnbs are cheap
I only ask because I think I can pull off a masters (without thesis) in a single semester if I count the graduate level courses I'm taking right now lol
like, i lived in berlin for 2 months for school. that's obviously still different from living somewhere for years. but the leeway to spend my time slowly exploring a massive city and its surroundings, to stake out places that i felt comfortable revisiting, and to build community to go do cool shit with
made it so much more fun
but doing a masters costs money
possibly, but look into this sort of thing. you will CERTAINLY pay a lot less for a masters in europe so if you want to do grad school in europe, you could just do that there
and some masters programs are even funded
true true
it's incredible. i was paying hostel prices for a single room in the nicest neighborhoods of barcelona, basel, genoa, milan, had wonderful hosts who helped me with everything i needed, etc
like 30-40 bucks a night
sounds wonderful
probably tougher if you want to stay for longer periods of time. idk
also as someone younger I'm ok with less than ideal living conditions for a smaller period of time
travelling just me and friends vs travelling with parents is so so so different just for that reason
I mean if I stay on campus for an extra semester, I get to live with my brother for an extra semester which would be quite fun
but yea cost is an issue
Don't underestimate the amount of bureaucratic hurdles to clear regarding visas and permits. It's not just a matter of getting an institution to accept you; you'll also need to get the civil authorities in the country to allow you to move there for the duration, and they won't necessarily care a lot about the university's favorable opinion of you. In many countries, being a PhD student is a job, so you might need a work permit rather than a study visa ...
It's doable if the right circumstances come together, but it's a near certainty that it will be more stressful than you imagine beforehand.
being competitive doesnt mean most apps are discarded lol
Hmmm true I forgot this angle
is there a downside to doing a summer school type thing
rather than an REU
https://www.math.princeton.edu/SummerProgram
I'm looking at this specifically
but like in general these summer school things instead of an REU
I'm debating if I should apply to both lol
oh true, that first part is a deal breaker
I need letters for grad school š
I don't wanna bother my letter writers
but then it would take away from the research I do at an REU
I would rather die than be stuck at my uni over the summer
no offense to UIUC but it's the middle of nowhere
For me I'm already working on a research project at my school so the summer school isn't too bad because I can just work on that
what makes it great are the people and there aren't people over the summer
that's a last ditch resort lol
hm fair but if I don't get into an REU then what are the chances I get into one of these lol
Yeah it's free to apply so apply to as much as you want
also side note cause I am looking for stuff
but I wish there was a CS equivalent to mathprograms.org
so annoying finding CS stuff
fair
I see, thanks.
7 REU apps submitted (so far)
ty to this channel for all the help š
donāt most of them not open until January @smoky jetty
ppl at your place are famous tho
I went to a low ranked undergrad and we have students that went to harvard, michigan, cornell, berkeley for PhD. So ya you dont need famous recommenders.
I spammed like 20 apps lol
I never applied for foreign unis, no idea how it goes
but apparently GRE conductors made a huge fuck up this time around
their paper could not pass through the customs in time so the exam got cancelled lmao
that too at the day of exam
lo like ppl had to travel across the country to give the exam
can't really comment on that
My friend last year got into ucsd without the gre and they required it lol
well it was a fuckup nonetheless
They may have had famous recommenders even while being from a 'low ranked' institution right?
A lot of them left CMI, but anyway the AG people are more notable and none of my recommenders are AG people

By CMI do you mean Chennai Mathematical Institute? Isn't that one of the most well-known mathematics institutions globally?
Ye, not among the most well known lol
well known in India definitely
It is somewhat known for AG
all they do is AGšŖ
But one AG person died and one left for another uni
Are you from India?
ye
Ok
I know they dont since i know them. Most low ranked schools dont have famous people.
You can get a famous letter from an REU i guess. But most REUs dont have famous people participating. They may have well known/respected people though.
Ohk, what I meant to say was along the lines of them publishing papers with famous professors from other universities, rather than implying that the famous profs were at their own institution.
Alot of them are open rn
Publishing papers as an undergrad is already great, regardless of who you publish with
Saying you must publish with someone famous before you even enter grad school is a super super high bar
Basically no one meets that bar
I didnāt publish anything before grad school.
One of my profs mentioned that CMI is dying out and losing funds
IMSc virtually feels like a theoretical physics hub now, the mathematicians are too few
I have a question about how people got into some of the higher level areas of mathematics. I feel I'm much more ahead on math than the average undergrad (at least in algebra). However I'm not going to be able to take a course in commutative algebra or algebraic number theory until grad school, and I'm not going to be able to take a course in algebraic topology until the spring of my senior year after I submit PHD apps
So how is someone like me supposed to determine if that's what they want to research in grad school?
Or how is someone who hasn't been able to take all the math that I've taken so far supposed to determine what math they want to do in grad school?
sorry man
hmmm so even if you apply straight to phd
in like a statement of purpose or whatever
you don't have to talk about any of that stuff?
like "oh I'm interested in [these fields] because of [reasons]?"
can you be more broad?
Oh ok
yeah grad committees know that not everyone knows what they want to do, itās sufficient to just say what you like about the fields of math youāve seen so far and why youāre interested in them. i think itās mainly important to demonstrate you know what youāre getting into, that youāre applying for a research degree not an extended education
thereās a reason that most math phd programs in the US donāt force you to come in with an advisor (unlike most other STEM fields) - undergrads have only seen a small segment of the classical mathematical canon so theyāre not expected to know what they want to research
Oh I thought math phd programs asked you to come in with an advisor like CS lol
not in the US at least
Gotcha
in programs where they want a masters first like Europe things may be different
this is what I get for really only talking to CS grad students >_>
haha make sense
ok that makes more sense though if that's the norm
also hmmmmm if I wanna do grad school in Europe then I guess I'm going to have to look at the feasibility of a masters
iād definitely suggest looking at faculty webpages and naming a few faculty youād be interested in in your statement of purpose. look for ones who seem to be taking on students (ie no emeritus faculty)
Right of course
I kind of wish I could just apply for an extended education, I feel like there's so much to math that I'm still missing. Though that feeling will probably never go away given how broad math is these days :s.
Idk at beast so far I can say I know a little bit of functional analysis, rudimentary manifolds, some set point topology, and some galois theory. Everything I did before that didn't feel like real math lol. And my current school wants me to graduate a year early. I'm already pushing it by taking 3-4 graduate courses and maaaaybe an independent reading next term instead of just finishing up my 2 remaining gen eds
Either graduate early or they're fine with me taking on an entirely different major/minors but noooo taking more math classes is a no-go =.=
the first year of grad school gets you up to speed quickly haha, i felt a similar way (about wanting to learn much more) but I learned a ton the first year. I also think once you start settling into a field of math you like, you realize thereās plenty of math to learn within your field and the fear of missing out on other areas starts to fade away
very few people can be generalists these days, specificity is part of the job description
Hopefully that's the case. I took 3 qual sequence courses this term at this school and so far I havent felt like I've learned a ton but maybe the second half of them (which I'm signed up for next term) will change that
. Also as somebody who missed out on math competitions due to crippling Adhd and a host of other mental issues not diagnosed or treated until college it feels kinda weird to know more advanced math but not being able to solve high school problems lol
are you taking a regular undergrad credit load (like 5+ courses per semester?) my experience is that itās hard to learn grad level material when youāre taking more than 3 classes, thereās just not enough time to sit down and solve problems and think deeply about the material
Yeah I took 5 courses
in grad school you (surprisingly) might have more time
You're right that I didn't get a lot of time to really internalize the material :s, but I actually made my best grades ever this term lol, probably cause it's been my most psychologically stable term ever
Got 4 A+s and an A š„³, but I already barely remember what I learned except for maybe the stuff in functional analysis
nice!!!
Thanks! Like, I know grad classes have more lenient grading too but my pdoc upped my Adderall and gave me some anxiety meds at the start of the term and the anxiety meds in particular kept me relativily chill at times when I would've had breakdowns in the past, and also lowered stress-induced procrastination greatly. So I could work to an extent I never could've before. That's on top of the antidepressants and mood stabilizers I'd been put on before this term. It's been a long journey :/ but I feel like I'm finally making progress towards a point where I can express my fullest potential :D.
Now I just kind of wish I could redo all of high school and undergrad with this attitude lol
Is anyone applying to the University of Rochester? If so, does anyone know what the guidelines they have for their statements of purpose are? The application itself only says "Please refer to the Instructions for details regarding school and program specific requirements", and I can't find anything about it on the math department website
how big of a difference even is there between famous and well-respected
it's not like a fields medal makes you better at writing rec letters
(i'm not applying there, but i'm looking online to try and help)
for some other departments at rochester, this information seems to be on the department website graduate information page, but the math department page is very scant, which is worrying. you might want to email kimberly.toal@rochester.edu , who is listed as the contact
I am scared of emailing strangers so I will wait until the absolute last possible minute to do so
Mostly I just want to know if it's meant to be 1000 words or 500 words; different schools have different word count limits.
i don't think you can be blamed for how long it is if the information is not available anywhere.
Yeah, that makes sense. I'll probably just adjust my Cornell or Michigan statement and change around professor's names.
Eep I am not sure how carefully I checked between 1k or 500
most places that have 1 are 1k and most places with 2 are 500 I thinkish?
the phyics department at rochester has some information about SOP but does not specify a world limit for example
good luck 
In that case I'll assume it's a generic "try to keep it concise but we're not stingy about the wordcount".
my professor told me to aim for roughly/no more than 2 pages when a specific length isn't given
š
my generic statement is ~1200 words if that helps
and then I have a ~350 word generic teaching and diversity statement
and I basically just cut and paste stuff from both statements depending on what specific information is asked for. For instance some programs say to include stuff about teaching, diversity, personal background, etc and some don't
But this is something that must be done to get into grad school without a perfect GPA right?
no
idk where you keep getting these ideas
but I would stop looking there since clearly that place isn't doing anything except setting unrealistic standards
I think maybe just half of the grad students I know, if not less, published anything in undergrad
let alone with someone "famous"
even with less than perfect GPAs
Yes I am lucky to be doing undergraduate research
but I would not say my research advisor is "famous" (and he wouldn't say so either)
he's great and he's been an invaluable mentor to me
You are famous
?
I seen you in that space movie
Idk what Iām doing Iām just joshin you
Shoutout to Josh- I need to work on my apps lol
Do masters apps need high school transcripts?
for my own sake i hope not
i donāt know how they can expect that at all
your whole perspective on grad school requirements seems really unrealistic though in my opinion
Not only unrealistic but unhealthy
Graduate admissions are a minefield of exceptions at best but really just down right inconsistent, it's neither productive nor healthy to compare yourself to some ethereal (and probably incorrect!) standard of "person who gets into grad school." If you want to take Yourself down then you can do so elsewhere, but that kind of thinking will not be entertained here.
I feel like āgraduate levelā courses also differ across countries and schools. I know there are certain universities that teach Galois theory at the undergraduate level while my university teaches it as a graduate level course
what would a typical resume of an applicant who was offered a teacher assistantship contain? or is that too broad of a question
I mean, at Berkeley if you are accepted into grad school (for math), you're guaranteed a TA position
I'm applying to Cambridge, the application doesn't have a place for personal statement but it has a section about Career goals and another for Reasons for applying. In the reasons for applying section I mentioned my specific interests giving examples of what I find interesting and talked about why I want to study in cambridge. Is there anything else i need to mention there? Like managing while facing challenges... Also I don't have research experience yet but as a part of the Ug curriculum I'll be writing my dissertation this semester, so should I mention that?
you should mention what courses you'd be interested in doing and why you're prepared for them
if you can write about your dissertation do that, if you can link facing challenges to being able to digest stuff quickly or manage a large workload then put that too
career goals for me was trying to get as many words as possible out of "I want to do a PhD and become a professor" (as it would be for most ppl applying)
or what work you're doing to bridge gaps and so on
Most ( basically all) reputable programs guarantee funding for some number of years (maybe not summer). This funding is usually from TAing, research assistantship, or fellowship.
so every graduate student gets some sort of additional duty
do research assistantships have extra duty?
If you're doing a PHD then you're doing research right?
Then research assistentship wouldn't be extra duty?
but that's just semantics really
what is a fellowship btw. I hear that word tossed around but idk what it means
Generally a fancy word for scholarship.
Sometimes you get funded to join someones research project but it may not be your main project or may not align with your thesis goals you do it for funding
It depends but ya most math students have to TA for funding
oh
This is more of an applied ( i dont even think applied math but like applied cs)
ah. Like from an external source or within your university?
Yeah.
I had this happen for funding last semester lol. Kind of crashed and burned that second research project but that's a separate story which I won't talk about here >_>
"Research assistantship" is a bit of a catch-all term. In the experimental sciences there's a need for assistants to do grunt work in the lab which doesn't necessarily teach you anything advanced enough to count as PhD training.
In more theoretical field like mathematics, I think it is just as common to be merely an accounting category -- if you have a research grant which according to the funding body's rules can't be used for supporting PhD students but can be used to hire lab assistants, then you can hire your PhD students as assistants to do whatever they'd be doing anyway.
Or if the department hosts a conference, a lot of the practical footwork can be farmed off to research assistants.
Most of the time RA mean your advisor is funding you to work on research more
what would a typical TAship look like? what would you be in charge of and what would the responsibilities be
Mine? I was mostly meming
Or did someoneās messages get deleted or something
I think theyāre talking about knightwatch
Who consistently makes ridiculous statements regarding grad school admissions
Fair the message above asked about if high school transcripts are required for masters apps and i donāt think thatās unreasonable
i wasn't asked for any transcripts or anything else
iirc A&M asked me what my high school was but no details
apparently no-one from my HS applied to A&M before which ig isn't a surprise
They should ask for your transcriptsā¦
Which masters apps are still open lol - Iām really late on this train
Not high school. You just said they didnt ask for your transcripts.
oh i meant high school transcripts [since that was the q]
obvs they asked for my uni transcripts : p
i wasnāt asked for hs transcripts either
Knightwatch is unrealistic but I think their ideas are closer to the truth than waving your arms around and saying nothing can be known. The idea of guessing admission likelihood from application statistics, courses, and letters certainly needs more realism and data. It would be nice if colleges post a "typical admitted student" profile to see who you're competing against.
Right, while the extent of subjectivity in the process certainly does make it tempting to call grad school admissions a 'crapshoot', and I do acknowledge the role that luck plays, the fact remains that if you look at an applicant's 'stats' like their publications, GPA, major GPA, coursework, undergrad institution, maybe even letter writers, and so on, one can certainly make at least an informed comparison between them and the profiles of people admitted to X university.
Although for international applicants, it may be tougher to make this comparison, especially when looking at universities that people from their undergraduate institution or similar undergraduate institutions in their home country have not gone to in recent years.
There are certain websites that do provide anonymous profile stats along with where those people got accepted, although the claims made there are not verifiable.
Although frequenting those websites may not really be the best decision, for reasons elaborated upon by quite a few people on the server...
I think this is all a bit moderated from what you were saying earlier :p
wow knightwatch is coser to the truth than saying nothing can be known. That says a lot!!
What does it take to get into graduate programs as someone who is self-taught without undergrad?
unfortunately unless you're prodogical and ready to drop a proof to a millenium problem it's probably to obtain some kind of respectable undergrad qualification as cheaply/quickly (whichever matters more to you, I would guess you would need at least 2 years of time however you do it) as possible
US-style degrees might not be ideal if you know you just want to do math
My interest is cryptography, I've had a blast working through the cryptopals puzzles and especially enjoyed attacking repeating key xor using statistics so I'm looking at the intersection of math and computer science
whats your motivation for a phd/masters?
I would like to do research and the companies I've applied to are all like 50% PHDs. I've gotten through the application process for a few but there is always a "better candidate"
idk anything about cryptography but getting that far in application processes without a degree sounds pretty/extremely impressive
still idk if it's feasible to skip an undergrad degree altogether
I do enjoy a good puzzle
unless you did end up getting a job in industry and had a ton of industrial experience, ig
Ha yeah the foot in the door would be sufficient
You might have more luck asking about this on the CryptoHack discord (DM me for an invite if you don't have it)
Since a number of people there are cryptography PHDs / a couple work in industry
Thanks, DM'd
Thatās crazy
what is funding like for a thesis-based masters in math?
I'm debating doing that instead of a PhD first (cause less commitment) but if funding isn't a possibility like a PhD then I don't think I can do it
Few and far between
Any advice for finding places to apply to?
what is the difference between a thesis track and a no thesis track for a masters in math? the school iām apply to has both but i couldnāt find the differences aside from how many credits from each level of courses
is like a thesis something that will help you going into a phd program?
https://jlmartin.ku.edu/~jlmartin/masters.html
https://www.profellow.com/fellowships/fully-funded-ma-and-ms-programs-in-math/
I don't necessarily recommend this though as I've heard it can harm your chances especially if you were a stronger undergrad application. Afaik you can always drop out of a PhD and have your masters provided you complete whatever requirements are listed
the university i applied to is listed on there
Yea that's what I'm thinking
Canada
Ask faculty you know and look up schools
Princeton and cornell have a funded masters in cs
Your better off doing a phd if thats your end goal.
should i have something school specific every personal statement
A little bit yeah
^
UC Santa Barbara has a funded MS in math
It's rare to find at PhD granting institutions. I went to California State University, Long Beach
it wasn't "technically" funded, but I was granted scholarships to attend
Depends on where you want to do a Ph.D., in Sweden a M.Sc. is a requirement when applying to start doing a Ph.D..
But there's only 1 slot per year?
Yea this is my debate lol
I think really I need to figure out potential schools lol
if you want to go into academia, my experience is that it is better the longer a phd takes (for example many countries it is 3 years, and in some 5 years, the people from 5 year institutions are so much more competitive since they have more publications and comparison is pretty much "time after phd", nobody cares how long it took)
Id only apply to masters abroad where there is funding
I feel like the abroad funding for masters always feels kinda fuzzy plus you need a work visa
how do you get funding for masters? Isnt that just for Phd and postdocs?
in the UK it's basically only Oxbridge that gives out many scholarships for masters (that aren't for a very specific group of people)
no wayyy werent u in that olympiad maths forum
Depends on the need of the university
i do recognise you from that server
i never did olympiads was just friends with ppl who did
So like here at UIUC, I was talking to a grad student and he said if I did a masters here there is a good chance I could get a TAship
Just cause they need more TAs in some classes
But of course if the university has more than enough PhD students then they'll just use them
That's my understanding at least


