#graduate-applications
1 messages · Page 4 of 1
Eh
It’s hard for them to judge how smart you are based on the materials they have
So they’re basing it on way more than just that
guess not
I'm just gonna send them off and forget about them
as long as I get a funded offer either UK or US I'm happy
You think too highly of people at top schools
Theyre probably ‘smart’ but you dont have to be senior wrangler at cambridge to go and do well at a top phd in the us
true enough
dont the recommendation letters explicitly say how smart you are?
I’m sure literally every letter they receive says “X is smart”
But that’s someone else saying it lol
And like that’s not objective
i mean suppose you are asking a professor who got their phd at harvard/etc for a recommendation letter. they would have a good sense how you would compare to their cohort when they went to grad school and i would expect them to say where they would suspect you to lie
Sure but like
There’s gonna be tons of ppl with letters from ppl from top schools saying they’re smart
My point is like you can’t filter for “smartest” because you can’t have that much precision
And smart isnt everything
Being persistent and hardworking is important
Terence tao spends hours per day on math. Saying someone is smart doesnt mean shit.
i guess i suspect that the people who get into top top schools to have recommendation letters from reputable professors who say something like "this student is likely one of the top x undergraduate mathematicians in the united states at this moment" or "this is the undergraduate with the brightest mind i have seen matriculate from this department in the last 10 years" or something and say that with some kind of reputation on the line
maybe it is not like that though
Not at all
Maybe the second but you dont need to be a top x mathematician in the us to get into a top school.
Most people at top schools dont end up being famous profs
I doubt most end up as profs
haha fair enough
i meant to qualify as undergraduate
and mathematician sounds kinda presumptuous i meant something closer to "top x undergraduate mathematics student"
No not at all
I kind of think the perk of a smaller department or less well known one is in that statement more so at a top school sure you're in the top x of students worldwide but it seems like it's harder to distinguish yourself but at a smaller or not as well known school you can distinguish yourself as one of the best in the department and faculty will probably know you which will make the letters better and it's easier to compare you to past students of the school. Of course smaller schools are limited in what they offer/faculty and prestige and I'm not expert in any of this but that's just my thoughts.
Saying Terence Tao is smart does mean something. Good students trying to get into graduate programs are all hardworking, persistent and dedicated. Working hard is like the minimal requirement
Dude
Smartness discussions are annoying
If I ever read a rec letter that says "this person is the smartest person in the world" I will not take it seriously
It diesnt matter how smart you are. It matters what work you do, how much you achieve
Imo a Good rec letter writer should write about the quality of your work, not compare your "smartness" to others
I hate that
I mean in a similar vein see JFK's personal statement things were different back then I suppose
algorithms and complexity theory
I think the point of recommendation letters is to speak about qualities that are not easy to display through achievements
You should be ok. What schools are you applying to?
In the US I'm applying to Columbia, Duke, Michigan, and CMU (it's a bit ambitious and I don't expect to get in, my advisor recommended that if I don't then I continue work with him for a couple years and reapply). In Europe I'm applying to ENS, Max Planck, and EPFL. I think I should get into all 3 of those, maybe with the exception of EPFL.
What about you?
Oh also applying for MSR Fellowship
I did some work at MSR in the summer so hoping
Good luck! Those are some good schools.
Thanks! To be completely honest, the list is mostly an intersection of places that offer a fee waiver, places that don't require english tests, and places in the top ~30 for algorithms and complexity.
Warwick is really good for tcs too
There is a prof there that I wanted to work under but unfortunately he's not taking graduate students this year
How does Europe work for grad students? Are masters there funded?
Some of them
The tuition fee is almost always negligible though, from what I've seen
Switzerland and UK seem to be the exceptions to that
Yeah those were the two countries I had looked at lol
Go Columbia!
Go CUNY!
do I actually need to put professors' phone numbers for the UChicago app?
I couldn't send the request without one
You can give your institution's phone number
Omg
Is that
the Moldilocks
Yup
Currently my statement essentially looks like a couple of paragraphs for things I worked on/am working on, a few more lines about other problems and TAing/mentoring etc, and finally school specific stuff. I am not sure how much detail is appropriate, how to make it flow naturally and less a regurgitation of facts, while not saying too little. Most of the work is elementary and I am afraid I'll say something that would sound naive. Does anyone have any general related advice? Or link to somewhere in the server where such a discussion has already taken place? (This is for TCS by the way.)
I didn't think of this lol, 2/3 of my profs had phone numbers on their websites anyway
yeah and even if thats not the case, the publication is usually nothing ground breaking
tho there are some people who have crazy good research too. my friend in physics (tho he already has a fellowship at cambridge in undergrad so he is a special case)
lol
u got a fully funded masters at CMU?
yeah, all of them would say that the student is outstanding. from what i have heard, it matters more who is writing it and if they have connections to unis u wanna get into
which is kind of an issue for me, all the people i ended up working under have no connections to unis abroad.
u could probably get into princeton then
ask him to put in a good word for u before u apply maybe
i dont 😅
I would have to have some lottery-winning luck to get into Princeton
Though again that's the case for everyone xd doesn't hurt to apply
well regardless, make the chances of it as high as possible 🤷♂️
do this
all u can do
yeah, just maximize your chances
sadly none of the profs i ended up working under have significant connections abroad.. im not from a great uni.. so i doubt id get in either. but regardless, im trying to get my dad/profs to dig up some connections so i can get some kind of informal letter/help somehow. kind of late to do this sadly, should not have used up time working with profs in my uni
btw guys. any universities that accept with GRE scores? I have a decent one and hoping that can help
Also, any advice for TOEFL? I need to complete it in like less than a week amidst my finals

People usually mess up in the speaking section, even when they are fluent. Keep in mind that you don't need to be extremely fluent, and being able to get your ideas across is enough. You can decide to rephrase a sentence while in the middle of one, and you will not lose any points, so do not get nervous and continue talking nonsense if you think that you started saying something that you didn't want to. Basically, natural, casual speech is completely fine, and you don't need to be extra wary of how you're speaking. Another thing is that you can get self conscious because everyone taking the exam is in the same room, but in my exam, one guy was literally screaming into his mic, and no one cared. You can be surprisingly loud without disturbing others, so don't try to whisper into the mic.
i have a problem, especially when im nervous, i start speaking broken english
oof
i think i will be taking it online (if i can). i really dont like such disturbances
if i cant take it online, duolingo will need to suffice anyways..
I don't have a solution for that, except that you can talk in very casual English. Like of course, not the kind of English you'd see on Twitter etc, but the kind in which you'd talk to a friend
Ye that's cool then
100 is not too difficult if you are fluent. The hard part is that there are often subsection minimum scores
yeah 25 in each
Ye that should be easy in reading and listening (assuming you have no problems with the accent)
Writing and speaking are usually where it is low
its crazy how the fuck i busted my ass for GRE and now people care more about toefl than GRE.. 🤦♂️
any schools u would know that care decently about GRE?
GRE doesnt either
anymore
Ah, that's nice
I know MIT and Columbia do
15th dec
hmm ok
And Harvard as well
im not from some top uni and neither am i from some favored diversity groups
Right

bruh @candid quarry
i am seriously pissed off on how much more useful toefl is than the gre..
Ahh masters in CS
Ye I didn't even give subject GRE
likely wont be applying to harvard anyways so eh
need to be rich, diverse, have toefl, im none of those
no one does
but even general GRE is absolutely useless
spent like 1k$ just on retests..
I can't apply to Harvard for math because of no GRE lol, they are requiring it
bruh
oh shit
Be careful about that, I've seen a few good places that don't accept the home version of TOEFL
this is good
dont really have any other option..
no tests till after the deadline
This is honestly nonsense. I don't understand AT ALL why any decent graduate program, particularly PhD ones, require GRE or even recommend it.
shit they dont accept gre at home either..
Ah I see
masters
but hey.. at least it offers some way of me proving myself
cuz otherwise any top uni is basically beyond my reach. what will they accept me on the basis of? my toefl scores?
Do you think any top uni will accept you on the basis of your GRE score?
actually required in all 3 of my fields
at least i hope it gives them a reason not to automatically reject me
hopefully
anyways thnx for all the guidance @inner solar @candid quarry i will try to do TOEFL as well as i can
Good luck!
thnx 😄
I believe the GRE requirements aren’t set by departments, but rather the larger graduate schools that control admissions
depends from uni to uni
All the best
No, I’m here for a math PhD
thnx
could anyone give a read over my SoP? think it's pretty much done apart from a bit more about my masters thesis
anyone have advice on this? I have uni exams from 27th and i really need to study for them. I could try and complete my TOEFL and requirements before early deadline but it does not mention anywhere if early deadline has any advantage on admission chances
is this duolingo score easier to achieve by any chance?
CMU 
yeah, any advice?
i would but idk if i would be best for advice
yeah pref someone in math
Hmm, no, I'm just really interested in one research group there
Gpa, lor, personal statement. I can tell you that you wont be accepted bc ur gre lol. It doesnt really help. Just doing bad can hurt.
yeah i never said id be accepted because of those. but i just hope they dont reject me because im from a bleh uni. I hope GRE may help with that
U did say what else would they accept you on the basis of
couldnt get LoRs from people with US connections either cuz i was from bleh uni. tho i should not have worked with profs at my uni. was my own fault but i didnt know better back then
any advice on this?
No
ok
i have a good GPA but i doubt they would care since its a bleh uni, unless I could also back it up with my GRE scores/some other standardised test. my main issue is that some unis wont even look at them
thnx for the advice (genuinely saying this and not in some sarcastic/passive aggressive manner. i genuinely appreciate any conversation/advice from this channel)
i think that's one of the uses of the GRE
i might try this
also. someone from math help george with feedback if u can
lmao thanks
👍 didnt want it to get drowned out
I could maybe help, but I don't know how good my advice would be
Yeah, that’s pretty usual in the US
nice
can u apply to both phd and MS?
CMU doesn’t have a master’s in math open to apply to
But some places do
NYU just gave me admission to their master’s program bc I didn’t make it in off the waitlist
I dont think ms in math is competitive
sorry? didnt get u there
It’s a money grab
Yes
Most masters are tbh
yeah i was thinking perhaps if i dont get into any good unis this year i could try for direct phd next year with better pubs (especially if i can also apply to masters simultaneously)
There are a lot of schools that use master’s as a way to get a ton of money
Thats harder and i would only do it if your goal is a phd
it was/is for the most part
Was?
If your goal is a PhD and you’re in the US, you should probably not be going for a master’s unless it’s a requirement for application for whatever reason. Like as far as I can tell, places like CMU in engineering and computer science are basically master’s degree mills bc of name recognition
i dont think im qualified enough for phd yet
at least not at such schools
cant even do an epsilon-NFA to DFA
That doesnt matter
if im qualified or not?
A lot of cs masters are like this
The fact you have research and potentially publications is already a jump ahead of a lot of people anyway
Look at my pinned message
Yeah I’m not surprised
In my experience A lot of international students get masters
this one? 😂
Yeah
so u think i should start applying for masters and phd from now on itself?
my pub is horrible tho man. i just annotated a dataset and trained two models on it
Look at masters in europe/canada
canada is expensive
Where youre more likely to get funding
im applying to germany
MAsters in canada are usually funded?
i was thinking of maybe getting a job for a few years before phd (tho idk if this would have been possible) for a house
ill check then. tho i heard they dont accept non canadians
yeah but at least in states avg salary for softE is a lot more
Bru we arent talking about swe
at least the numerous statistics i have read
swe?
Softe
then? CS?
Why does the average SOFTE salary matter?
.
We arent talking about job salaries?
Spending >100k total for two years let alone living costs is not worth it if your goal is to end up doing a PhD and living off of stipends for 4-5 years
yeah..
Buying a house? In the us?
So funded masters should be looked at in general, which are not the US
well i wanted to eventually have the security of that.. plus if u are paying installments at least it goes towards an asset rather than rent which is just neg from ur salary
yeah ok. ill look at europe
seems like my best bet. plus many of my friends will go there too
Youre all over the place. Try to think about what you want to do.
ill still apply to unis with deadlines on 1st/29th then maybe have a discussion with my family/advisors and firue it out. but thnx for all the advice
yeah
as i said. i dont feel that id get into any good phd program and my prof said that a better option would be to get into a good masters program and work my way up from there
or wait a year and get some pubs and then apply for phd
But now youre talking about getting a job and a house lol
i did want a house.. but ig that wont be possible
maybe its just a culture thing. where im from everyone has a house and its kind of a security
is this possible tho? at the same uni/different uni? or is that against some rules?
Youre out of touch if you like you were going to spend a ton of money to get a masters and then get a job and try to buy a house with all that debt and then get into a phd program and either sell your house or continue making mortgage payments and loan payments while in a phd.
hmm yeah
Any German masters students here?
is it normal to cite papers in statements of interest?
like if I'm mentioning research I did to link my paper
Ya that seems reasonable
I feel like if it’s in your cv then what’s the point?
It certainly doesnt hurt.
Does saying something like 'what I have done so far is mostly elementary but I hope to contribute in a more significant way to TCS and combinatorics' hurt? I basically don't want the rest of the statement to sound like I think too highly of my projects, but I don't know if stating it like this is the right way to do it.
Don’t give them a reason to doubt you
You don’t need to lie, but you shouldn’t already set the expectation to be low
You can reframe it like “I have enjoyed what I have already done, and am excited to contribute to the subject in the future after continuing my studies”
Or something like that
Wtf you have a pub
btw i experimented and i think u can apply to as many masters programs + 3 phd programs at once in CMU. totalling almost 10-12 programs. idk if its a good idea but it does put my conundrum at rest for the time being. i can then carefully decide (difficult to think over such important deep stuff rn cuz uni exams coming up)
sounds good to me personally. but asking others would be better. i would personally also perhaps add some stuff that i am looking forward to working on (more specifically) and the stuff im trying to get published/working on actively
for example, "my research has mostly been elementary, but currently im working on a license plate recognition model that achieves state-of-the-art results, outperforming previous models in size, efficiency, and speed. I look forward to submitting it to IJCAI, ECCV, or other conferences in the future."
that sounds really good. thnx a lot. definitely a good idea
Optinions on Caltech's PhD programs? I am interested in CS and their new CMS (Computing & Math. Sciences) program
But I am also more interested to learn about life there
Life in SoCal is very nice
Not a fan of sunny weather 
I can't stand weather over 28-30 celsius
What is the overall proportion of activities there?
Between research/courses/maybe TA stuff?
Not if you don't like the heat
In august/september it gets kinda hot
Are you in socal now?
It only gets over 30 C during august/september
No I am just considering to apply
Talking to Agne
ah ok
At the moment
are you studying there?
No I'm just back home for thanksgiving
can you only ask about pure math PhD programs here? what about mathematical physics or theoretical physics? 
Sure but unless there are people here familiar with physics grad school apps then it wouldnt help.
why the 😐 ? 
how much detail should I go into on my research for statements of interest
like for the project I'm proudest of and is the most related to what I want to do in grad school should I say
a) "I did a project on this topic"
b) "I did a project on this topic. This is a high-level overview on our problem and result"
or
c) ""I did a project on this topic. This is a high-level overview on our problem and result. This is a high-level overview on our proof"
Bc that tells us nothing about what you mean. Plenty of theoretical physics and mathematical physics is mathematically rigorous.
Id go with b. Unless you have a lot of space or the proof is particularly interesting. You can also broadly mention tools/techniques you used.
I personally would go more towards b
b is the way to go I think, I'm relying on letters to fill in those parts of c
Is it possible to live in Pasadena on a PhD stipend 
I mean Caltech probably pays well
Yeah I think stipends are generally reasonable, but you’ll be able to tell once you get an offer letter with exactly how much that is
If you only have to support yourself then you should be ok
Sharing a 2 bed 1 bath apartment with another grad student in Pasadena is very doable I believe
Is it a bad idea for me to say that I want to work on a topic that requires two advisors? For example, I want to work on the connections between X and X' so Dr. A and Dr. A' would be good choices for me as A specializes in X and A' specializes in X'.
Where X and X' are not fields where there are a lot of people who do both
For example, an example of something that would not be an X and X' pair here would be algebraic geometry and number theory
Since there are a lot of people who do arithmetic geometry
So I know someone who is doing something similar-ish
they're doing algorithms research + human-computer interaction research
and really since there's very very few people doing that combination of research, much less at my uni alone
She was saying that it's basically all on her to figure out how to meld the two together
She was also saying that she has a primary advisor who is in one of those areas, and the advisor in the other area is technically a "secondary advisor" (although I'm not sure about the significance of that)
One thing she told me about that (since I'm debating doing something along those lines, albeit maybe even more far apart) is that it's alot more work and you have to be comfortable working on your own in terms of research (i.e. have prior research experience)
since not only do you have to do a PHD, but you have to do it in a combination of areas where that combination may not be fleshed out
also it depends on the school
some schools may be chill with you doing this, some may not
idk how much of this makes sense, I'm kinda just parroting some advice I've gotten before
so if anyone else has more concrete advice, plz jump in
Depends on the word count ig, I wish I could add arxiv links in my SoP
I usually write a longer essay then trim the fat as per word count limitations of the uni
What is HCI anyways?
Do I have a chance in enrolling at Caltechs phd if I have one E grade in my masters transcript?
id think if u had a good explanation for the E, it should be. but also ask others
it is the lowest grade I have
just needed some compulsory credits for unrelated stuff
maybe I can try to remove it from my transcript by taking another course instead?
Actually I read that there is no minimum GPA requirement and GPA should not be reported for international applicants
However I still have to attach my transcript
I am not sure what to do
How many REUs is too many to apply to?
For example, is 20 too many?
I don't want to piss off my letter writers 💀
Submitting letters is not a hassle
They just upload once and then submit to all of them
well they have to change school names and shit right?
Maybe
so is 20 too many? is more ok?
basically I want to make sure I have something for the summer
other than my home uni
unless you request them like a day before the deadline I don't think they'll care about 20
based off mine they can shoot them off pretty quickly
might be a bit tedious but I'm sure they'll understand
Most letter writers write generic letters
And most REUs use mathprograms.org
So they won't have to upload the letters 20 times
^
Idk how many i applied to but it was a lot
I basically applied to anything that sounded remotely interesting on mathprograms.org
yea that's my plan
such as?
I mean TBH for me my options are (as far as I know)
1: continue my current research at my university for the summer
2: do an internship
3: do an REU
Option 1 sounds boring, I'd like to see somewhere new
Option 2 sounds awful, I already have done two software internships and disliked both greatly
so I'm looking at option 3 which has the nice bonus of being something good for grad school apps ig
whats REU?
Research experience for undergraduates
My understanding is you go and do some sort of work on some small problem
Learn some cool stuff
Meet people/scout out a school for grad school
Sounds like an overall good time
A lot seem to give housing too
One day id like to be a mentor for an REU
how do letters of rec work for mathprograms.org
Do letter writers just write one generic letter?
or do they upload a new one every time I apply to something through there that needs a letter?
Oh same question for cover letters (is that the same as statement of purpose / research statement?)
Yeah it's this
There's a general place to upload documents where you can also add recommender. And then when you apply to specific programs you can select which documents you want to use
For statements/cover letters though it's probably a good idea to make a separate one for each program
and then is it the same for the research statement?
ok cool, I just was unsure if I had the option to write a different one or not
I'd much rather write a tailored letter
Yeah you can and should write a different statement for each program.
But you can obviously reuse a lot
but the mathprograms page makes it sounds like you can only write one
that's what I've been doing
for REUs outside of mathprograms
There's also support for having your letter writers write tailored letters but that would be very unusual
nah that's alot of work on their end
Yeah it would be a pretty rare circumstance where that would make sense
should i call my undergraduate research projects REU?
that sounds good
we usually just get forced to work menial data logging jobs for 0 money. or to work on something non-menial, that a company would pay decent penny for.. also for 0 money.
Probably not REUs are things that typically over the summer research projects which you get paid a stipend for typically at a university other than your own (though if your university hosts one you can apply)
yeah our uni hosts such things but we call them UGRP (undergrad research projects)
no one pays anyone anything for anything as an intern/research assistant here. u r just supposed to work for the "experience" and a mediocre "certificate of participation" and a potential LoR
@shell kindlehey can u help me with how to phrase the diversity statement part. u said before:
Ok so for diversity statements, you do not need to necessarily talk about yourself
Indeed, for people with past challenges, writing about past trauma can be obscene in a sense, as if the only reason it happened was to prove that you are a capable person
Instead, for a diversity statement, a common thing to talk about is community outreach
So for math, this can take the form of mentoring younger students, reaching out to K-12 institutions in the community, helping to run the undergrad math club, etc...
But I don't quite get how to start of/introduce such a thing. any advice on that?
It just seems like i am not answering the question itself but answering how i have tried to do some of my part to help the larger society
if u have an example it could help. thnx
So for math, this can take the form of mentoring younger students, reaching out to K-12 institutions in the community, helping to run the undergrad math club, etc...
also what do we do if we've done none of these things lmao
There's still some time until December 1 (AFAIK earliest grad school deadline) so...
What do I do in 7 days lmao
In my Berkeley statement I just showed awareness of social issues since that seemed to fit the brief
sheesh
exactly lol
i have exams going on otherwise i really wanna apply to CMU on 29th.. will see if i can
still. someone help me with this pls
i think during my PhD i'll have to collect a load of this stuff
I would've done this sort of thing if any specific opportunities cropped up but I wasn't aware of any
oh i do have stuff like that
i'm writing an article for student magazine @ my undergrad uni etc.
does that sort of thing count
yeah for the most part i was seeking such stuff out cuz i knew it would help in grad apps
the only thing i dont have is leadership roles. other than informally becoming somewhat of a leader in research projects as everyone else was not very familiar with CV/DL/ML or even coding. but i think saying that may just make me seem pompous/arrogant since it wasnt a formal leadership role
wait. why not? or do we mean something different when we say this?
because our uni has flyers for undergraduate research projects and we spend a few months (maybe more) on these projects. it sounds pretty similar to REU
thats pretty useful, especially if u have a leadership role. but i still have 0 clue how u would connect that to diversity
that sounds good
I think REU is the name of a specific program for US undergraduates
oh
ill just call them undergrad research projects ig
just call em what the university calls em. that way, if its wrong, its their fault
Ye
they also call a glorified peon job a "student ambassador" 😂
i don't have any leadership roles
I thought this was all stuff that mattered for undergrad apps not postgrad
luckily berkeley is the only one asking about this and I'm not gonna get in there anyway lol
idk. theres a section on my grad app advisor and people say it matters. 🤷♂️ not sure
by postgrad u mean masters or...?
lol. try ur best ig
phd
Yes it’s similar but an REU is a specific NSF sponsored research program. Its not just any undergrad research program.
thnx. ill just put in undergrad research program/project
I dont think its a huge deal. Just put in a little effort to write a decent essay.
For this mathprograms site, should I have both a cover letter and a research statement? I'm not sure what I would write to differentiate the two
like it has both here
Can I just ignore these?
All I have for now is a research statement I tailor to each place I apply to
You need both
Ya i remember not really applying to ones that had a cover letter i was lazy lol.
any such resources for computer science by any chance?
i'm going straight from a BS to a PhD, but as a consequence of that i haven't taken courses in a lot of areas i might be interested in. but most universities still require me to name specific faculty and research topics. i feel like if i name a couple faculty members, i'd be locking myself into whatever fields those faculty members are in. and maybe my true passion is in a field i have no idea about yet, so i don't list an advisor that would be really good for me. and then what if my application is declined because the faculty i listed aren't interested (i don't know how big a role this question plays in my acceptance)?
but i also don't want to list half the people who teach at the university either just because they list a research interest i think i might like, based on my limited undergrad understanding.
There is no requirement to work with the faculty you list
^^
Presumably if you are going from bachelors to PhD then you are in the US but yes that’s fair
You arent expected to know exactly what you want to to. Its common for a grad student’s interests to change. Just list faculty that do something you think is interesting.
oh okay. someone told me the people i list was a really important deciding factor in my application. when does one pick an advisor anyway? do i do that my first year?
basically "don't overthink it"? lol
Yes, i wouldnt overthink it lol.
overthinking this kinda stuff is my specialty, but i'll try my best 😆
Its hard not too. Good luck! Also, dont be afraid to ask your the people writing your letters of rec for advice.
You pick an advisor whenever you find one that aligns with your interests, generally before the end of your third year
oh wow that's really down the line. kind of confusing that they make this a part of the application... i guess it shows which candidates have a strong idea of what they want to do or something? or how well they know the school?
Alot of stuff seems more down the line than I've been led to believe lol
So usually, if you aren't sure about what you want to do, you go to a large school with many people in a variety of areas
Hell someone told me that if I was unsure between a math and CS PHD, I could apply to both at the same school and pick from there as needed lol
But if you already know what you want to do, that can make things easier, especially if you want to go to a small, more focused, school
And like if you know you want to work with someone, then you can get started working with them in your first year
do you think it's better to leave out languages rather than put in a language I'm not great at?
lol. u applying for CS too?
i reckon its also that they dont want someone who only wants to be at the uni cuz its high ranking or something. most unis prefer to know why u would specifically want to go for them instead of the other 30 unis that are also top ranking and have great researchers
lmfao yeah. im unsure between masters and PhD and im likely gonna do the same (just gets hella expensive because CS also has specializations i would be interested in)
i wouldnt put it as language 1. tho id still add it. but idk whats the best strat
I don't have other languages 
English?
Yeah I guess I leave it
i would still add it
hmm
the limited french i know, id have listed all as poor
right I'm being very generous with my reading skills 
Debating between specifically something in pure math (probably algebraic), complexity theory, or algorithms
right
i feel like i did the wrong thing choosing ML/CV. too competitive rn and its much harder to publish research without computational resources/money
doesnt help that our uni is pretty bad and doesnt have GPUs
i come up with decent ideas (sometimes even sure-shot ways to improve performance) with no way to test/publish such stuff. unlike in algos, where u can just test such stuff within seconds
wouldnt u end up doing comp theory if u did algos anyways? like pretty easy to pivot between the two?
Not quite. I'll be extremely rough in what follows but it should give you some idea. Complexity theory is often more interested in lower bounds, but of course algorithms do occur. It is just that roughly the kind of algorithms you see in complexity have in some vague sense, different objectives or flavours than what one cares about in 'usual' algorithms. Here by algorithms in complexity theory I am including upper bounds in different models of computation, or reductions, but there could be other things as well. Another rough distinction is that (unless you do fine-grained complexity), just polynomial time is often good enough in complexity theory while a person in algorithms would care about n^5000 vs n^2.
hmm thnx
i just felt it may be easy enough to pivot/decide between the two once at uni. but ig im wrong
often times in any real applications we also care about the constants to some extent
I'm taking a course in fine grained complexity rn
It's quite interesting
Complexity theory is great
Lower bounds are rare though
Very rare
They're all conditional lol
Reductions are quite entertaining but concrete results are a pain
Then "lower bounds" is just "reductions" xD
There are some very elegant concrete lower bounds though
True
Have you read Rasborov-Smolensky?
No what is that
They introduced a polynomial method for showing lower bounds on circuit classes
Very very elegant
Ooo
I'll look at that later
Yea algebraic complexity stuff is probably what I want to do
But I know basically nothing about it tbh
I heard something about an 'algebraic geometry program' with regards to P vs NP
Sounds interesting but I know nothing about geometry
The core idea is this:
It was originally used to show that mod 2 cannot be computed by a circuit family called AC^0
They roughly showed that for every AC^0 circuit, there's a polynomial in F_3 that approximates the circuit function "well". They then showed that any F_3 polynomial differs from mod 2 in a large number of places. So this contradicts the assumption that an AC^0 circuit exists for mod 2.
Next semester I'm taking a course tho
Yeah geometric complexity theory
Yea
I'm lucky that my university has someone in complexity
Well, ok that's a stretch
He's mainly a geometer but he does some fine grained stuff
And the course I'm taking with him is nice
There are plenty of good resources for complexity theory, although it always helps to have discussions
Yea
What kind of complexity have you explored so far?
Just fine grained tbh only because that's the only non-intro complexity course I've taken
I'm taking a course in algebraic and geometric complexity next semester
Very excited for that
Oo sounds amazing
lol
Yea I'm super hyped for that
Also going to take algebraic geometry next semester
That'll be a good pairing
Although I haven't heard good things about the prof
i (and people i know) find theory overrated cuz many people come up with absolutely stupid stuff yet get best paper awards at top conferences
but to each their own
They get best paper awards at top theory conferences
tho i like both tbh. i know people who are far more application oriented than me
yeah
So that's not really saying anything
even tho its the most asinine moves in practice 
But the point isn't practice
What kind of stupid stuff?
in math id understand. but in AI idk wtf ud do from some of these theoretical papers 
That's a fruitless argument since any theory person will say that in reality alot of the theory has giant footnotes in it
like spending 10x more time on training for no reason 
AI != Theory
Oh idk about AI stuff
yeah just my experience. but eh. as i said. to each their own
Most theory people look at ML papers and think it's a bunch of people who are mainly guessing at how it works
Without actually understanding it
ML has theoretical papers
like this
didnt quite get u
They are not talking about AI
They are talking about algorithms and complexity
Information/coding theory
hmm ok
as i said, its just my experience (which is highly influenced by ML since thats mostly what i do)
some ML papers are gigachad both theoretically and practically tho
And so are some theory papers
and some point to completely wrong theory but work so well practically that we just ignore that part and use em anyways 
yeah i just dont like such papers, especially when they win awards and cause others to adopt similar asinine strats 
just cuz it becomes a trending field after a stupid paper gets best paper award in best conferences. its like "they did something so stupid and got best paper award, surely we can do a lot better"
I think the immediate goal of theoretical research is just different from applied. I've seen many theory papers avoid obvious optimisations because they tend to obfuscate the main contributions of the paper.
hmm yeah
idk about CS theory papers too much tbh
does this have to do a lot with automatas and TOC? cuz i absolutely hate those (studying for em rn)
Sometimes
But not all of it
thnx man will do
Automata theory is it's own thing
hmm nice
im gonna fail
in fourier analysis and TOC. im not even studying for AI...
hmm interesting
theres also some computational linguistics which idk what they do. something about making nice compilers that are easier for humans to interpret
But yea I should figure out at some point what field I want to go into lmfao
automata theory my beloved 
also why is UChicago demanding my reccomender's phone numbers 
idk them
u dont know ur reccomenders? 😂
u should tutor me. id pay u (tho im a bit broke so not much)
if i have any doubts in ToC may i ask u?
uhh if you want, I'm pretty active in #foundations which is probably the appropriate channel
What kind of stuff do you do in automata theory?
I've never really taken a deep look at it
I'm kinda interested in automatic structure theory which is when you take your normal algebraic structures like groups and rings and ask when the operations are computable by finite state automata
I haven't studied it much yet tbh
but it's connected to geometric group theory and model theory which are fields I do know more about
Oooo that sounds cool
Aaaaa I'm changing my school list again
Thinking of swapping GA Tech with WashU or IU, I really should just make my mind up xd
i need some advice: I have my exams going on, and early application deadline for CMU is 1st. Would it be better to rush an application a bit (but still decent) for early application, or just wait till 12th December for regular application deadline?
basically: for CMU, early application + decent SoP Vs. regular application + great SoP?
cant u apply to all?
I could but money
All of my options except GA tech I'd be happy going to so it's getting the boot
i doubt 1-2 courses would add that much to ur cost. but yeah i get ur point
bro if i got GA tech i would pop a bottle of champagne, cry, call all my friends, have a party, cry some more, and sleep
(FYI alcohol is illegal here)
i think u should consider subbing in waterloo instead lol
I think their deadline is 1st Dec so probably too late. I think I'll do both WashU and IU
The guy at IU said he's getting old though
none of their deadlines are 1st Dec afaik
for fall sem i mean
they usually go on till january/feb and beyond
In what field?
math too yes
both applied and pure
none of them are before jan 1st for starting in September
this is for applied math
it says MMath tho which may mean masters of math
im trying to get my SoPs done for UoT by dec 1 too
functional analysis (operator theory/algebras)
it does
wing suet li says she's not doing this anymore
hmm i read from googles preview so it seemed like it was jan 1, but applied math is still open if that suits u by any chance
phd in comp sci will be over soon too
ya they're all in pure
I think I'll just apply to both WashU and Indiana and ask my referees tonight to slide a reference in last minute
well, last minute, deadline is 15th dec
indiana is jan 15th so I'll just ask with my UK options
none of my referees profs are from "top unis" or have any connections there so im a bit worried about that
I am so happy I am in Sweden, here we do not do LOR. 🙂
nice lol
it is such a waste of time for everybody
Eh I think letters have their place
Especially for me where my grades are becoming less than ideal considering where I want to go 💀
Just have people as references that are to be contacted. The variance between letter writers styles makes the document practically useless to predict success.
Things will probably not change internationally for many years, just happy I am out of that burden 🙂
I wish letters of rec weren't a thing tbh
I do not come from a very good school and I certainly think my letter writers are not very well-known people
So that significantly impairs the value they carry and I can do nothing about it
In my experience the background of the letter writers did not make that much of a difference for my applications
It definitely does
One of my letter writers was a well known professor who had won prestigious awards and he said that he could only do 8 letters for some reason so I found someone else to do the other 7 and the other person was a pretty new postdoc and I definitely did better at schools where I had the postdoc letter and not the professor letter
This. I have had someone accept me to an REU and later say all they did was read my letters from two profs they know and accept me
I'm lucky I have 3 references tbh
I only have 3 because I switched from maths & something to just maths and got a different advisor
It's not really a fair system but I think it's got more upsides than down
there'll be fairness problems as long as there are universities that aren't as good as others and I'm not sure if you can really ever eliminate that
probably same outcome if there was no LOR and they were just references (if there was no LOR for applications)
A reference is someone to be contacted abt an applicant
Rather than a letter is written for them
But the point was more that prestige does have an impact—or more like people knowing each other does
Just en email/phone number in the application. If applicant is of interest then they might be contacted
ohhhh like a phone call instead
ic
that's quite a lot of work for the referee though?
people are very seldom actually called (I have been in several committees and nobody has ever been contacted as far as I know)
fair enough
It is quite obvious if an applicant is flat out lying about a reference (they could fake LOR too I assume) and if it is somebody in the committee that knows a reference they might just send a quick email for sanity check. I have only been part of employing PhD students.
LoRs are probably harder to fake because the writers are supposed to email them from their institutional accounts, right?
I have written 2 LOR for people going abroad and both times I uploaded it on webserver, don't think I supplied my email there, maybe I did
Oh, I see
anyway, LOR are necessary for pretty much anywhere else (might be a nordic countries thing not to have it)
LoRs are nice for some things
tho I guess I think it's because I'm lucky to have some things under my belt
like I can ask my current research advisor for a LOR that speaks to my research experience
which is really nice to have
but I bet if I was in a position where all my letters were like "yea idk he did well in my class I guess"
then I'd probably be singing a different tune
USCD really knows how to write a website
when applying and sending recommendation letters what do you put for relationship
do you state the class they were a professor for in a full sentence or smth?
I just put Professor or Research Advisor depending on which
No matter what you do DON’T put down “lover”
when I'm talking about my interest in math education in grad school statements how specific should I be?
in the sense of "I want to try to implement the techniques and philosophy outlined in these resources"
for my GRFP application I more or less was like "writers A and B greatly shaped my thoughts on math education, in particular I think ideas X and Y of theirs are very insightful and I plan to implement them in my classrooms when I become a professor"
I mean I didn't phrase it like that but that was the gist of a lot of what I was saying
now for grad school apps I'm wondering if I should keep all that specificity or speak in more general terms
How do you decide what you should talk about in your SOP. I realized I can give a chronology but its probably not what anyone wants. How and what should I be communicating
yo anyone applying to waterloo? my application portal does not have the option for like
CV/personal statement???
am i going crazy
not relevant to your question but are you applying for model theory?
because I'm also applying to schools for model theory and that school never crossed my radar
nah im applying for operator algebras and adjacent
wow this portal is stupid
turns out theres 2
u finish the first one which is personal info, and then put in the rest

lmao
I remember being very confused too lol @crimson valve
no
I really just should have said "teaching and diversity statement"
also unrelated but can I list preprints in order of relevance instead of date on my CV if they're all within a few months of each other?
Where are you applying?
don't want to dox my full list
Fair
Why not lol
Lol Waterloo's portal is seriously weird. You can't even see what file has been uploaded. At least they mention on their site that you can mail the support team in case you goof up.
The SOP just has to be copied into some text box, right? Washington also does the same iirc.
Should really get on finishing my Waterloo app now, just a few days left.
Yeah UW’s application is kinda cringe
if a school says N word maximum for statements, how important is it to hit that maximum?
my general purpose statement that I'll modify for each individual school will be around 2 pages so ~1500 words, but UC Irvine has 2 statements each with 1200 word maximum
you definately dont wanna go over it, thats a very bad look
oh sorry i miscounted
well i think the admission people like, prefer more consise things
so if you think you have included all you need to well below the word limit thats fine
Why is the school saying N word
So it's fine if a school says roughly two pages (like UT Austin) but my statement is just essentially a page?
dont think even the people admitting u want u to be too attached to ur previous profs/advisors 😂
their support team is amazing tho
i once had an issue (that i almost immediately resolved) but support staff kept pinging me and sent me 8 mails checking up if everything was working fine and if my issue was sorted (too bad most of them went in spam/promotion so i ended up wasting their time)
legit
"My lovely associate"
If you are applying to grad schools in the CSA, very
CSA?
Confederate states of america
damn nice pfp lol
Thanks
There is a place. to upload an sop in the uw app
Tho
Im pretty sure he’s talking about Uwash which doesnt.
how do you decide when your application is done lol
my trigger finger is itching on most of mine
but also I'm scared I'll think of something to change tomorrow or something : s
I think I just submitted and tried to forget about it until later
I don't think there's really much that can happen between now and the application deadline that makes your application that much stronger unless you're anticipating something
ye ye ik, all of the tweaks I've been making make pretty much zero difference
considering my LoRs aren't changing
might have dinner then shoot off UIUC
Ah, that's not confusing at all
i was confused whether UW meant waterloo wisconsin or washington lol
I just said fuck it and submitted them
When i was overall happy and thought any other changed would be nitpicky.
Ok I've now heard contradictory advice about this from different professors. Should I or should I not include course descriptions in my CV and how long can my CV be?
i doubt you'd have enough space?
though my course descriptions are all online and i just linked them
Make sure you're not over describing things. A short explanation is good, but it's easy to accidentally pad for length
That's kind of what I've heard and realized
If an application already asks for courses/course description, perhaps it's not really necessary to add courses or course description to your CV
Yeah I'm giving concise descriptions
Like for measure theory "topics include sigma algebras, measures, Lebesgue integration, Lp spaces, Banach spaces, Hilbert spaces"
How big of a deal would it be if I also included them in my CV?
Probably negligible, I don't think graduate applications will be judging how good and professional a CV looks
I can obviously just have separate CVs for the school that do vs don't ask for separate course summaries, but I also know that it's better to have important information in more places
Well the downside is less lack of professionalism and more adding an extra page to the document
But I suppose the most likely reaction on the part of the admissions committee would just be to skim that section of my CV if it was also listed elsewhere. And that wouldn't be a problem if both have the same information
Yeah that's true
When you're writing a cv later, less is usually more because there is an assumption of knowledge anyway
Yeah that's what I figured
In applying to grad school strong coursework is the most important part of the application so give that more details. When applying to positions after grad school, papers and talks are more the focus
"this postdoc candidate looks good, but I'm a bit concerned about the rigor in their first year analysis course" said no one ever
I wouldn’t include course descriptions in cv. Ive never heard of anyone doing that.
I hyperlinked course descriptions when I wrote the list I'm doing
Sorry to ping back to this but one or two REUs I really want to apply to want both a cover letter and research statement
do both of these have to be a page? Can you elaborate more on the difference?
Cause I feel my research statement is more of an overview right now anyways
(it would help if someone would be willing to read my research statement, that would probably be the most helpful but I know that's alot of work)
Sure you can send me your statement
tysm
My professor who knows these things well told me to
Also for schools that just require a statement of purpose/statement of interest does it make sense to make 1 page of it a "teaching and diversity statement?"
Even for schools that don't explicitly request one
I can fit pretty much all of the relevant stuff about mathematical background/interest in one page
And my professor said it was a good idea
Sounds like weird suggestions both for adding course descriptions, and writing equal amounts about research and teaching/diversity
Well equal amounts wasn't his suggestion, he just said to include something about teaching/diversity
And to aim for 2 pages when a explicit page limit isn't provided
I listed undergrad and grad classes separately because of this
A big part for me is being able to mention the books used and chapters covered for my independent studies
do REUs count for this?
hmm I wish I had done this now, I have a few of those but I think most places I care about let me upload a course list
done what? Put course descriptions on your CV?
so i have to list some faculty i'd be interested in working with for my phd program. i know it's not binding, but i'm looking at this one faculty member has a bunch of publications relate to stuff i've independently researched, and looks really cool and interesting. the only problem is that he's 85 years old and hasn't published in over 5 years lol. i don't know if it would reflect badly on me to list someone like that?
For a PhD remember that you'll generally be working with them in 2 years if you're in the us and will be working 4-6 years in the future so it may be feasible, but they might retire before you're able to finish
Let alone start working with them
yeah i'm almost 100% sure i won't be (and potentially shouldn't be) working with them. and i'm wondering if that means i shouldn't mention that i admire their work under the section about "Faculty/groups you are interested in working with"
I don't think it has a bearing on your application, but if there is absolutely no one else, put them lowest on your priority
Also worth pointing out some people "retire" and then still turn up and do stuff
Yeah that is true as well
Some people also end up working with multiple faculty one of my current professors actually worked with 3 different professors for their PhD
I am currently working with 3 different professors
I thought a lot of profs that retire see their students through?
Or at least you'd hope they'd sort them out with an alt supervisor without much pain
Yes but that means they don’t take on students if they think they’ll retire soon
oh i missed the context
I've been told even by people in their late 60s/early 70s that I should be careful since they might not be able to stick around long for references and such like
Ya definitely
How does that work
It’s like working with one professor but you replace one with three
Is one of them a primary advisor and the others secondary?
Or are you doing like 2 or 3 seperate projects?
I had seven different advisors for my PhD :--D (people moved and I also switch fields)
Goddamn
It depends. It doesnt have to mean you work with all 3 simultaneously. You could just work closely with multiple professors throughout your phd.
am I correct in thinking international students don't pay FICA?
I see
wouldn't that make a phd take longer??
No im not sure why that would have any affect
The stress of meeting with all 3 advisors each week makes me more productive
ig means you're pretty much sorted for postdoc referees lol
Ya my friends that work w multiple profs dont usually meet with all of them. It depends who they are working with more at that time
I see
Well you're spending less time on each project (by virtue of doing multiple)
Then again math / TCS is alot of just thinking and taking breaks
Like i said. It doesnt mean youre working with them all simultaneously.
Also, its common to have concurrent projects. More time != better. When youre stuck sometimes you need to look at something else.
Yeah I get to procrastinate on debugging my code for one project by writing buggy code for another
what is the subject?
Numerical methods for pdes
what kind? dg? cutfem?
Lagrangian discretizations
dunno what that is 🙂 seems to be used for weather/flow problems?
I am on a plane but I can explain once my flight lands
when a program application says to briefly describe why you are interested in the topic we offer
how brief should you be?
about 1 page or like half a page?
I think I can always write more and then pare down
I didnt list it as work experience
I think it depends on if there’s another field to put Reu stuff
If there isn’t then I would put it there
But reus are paid positions, pretending they aren’t work is stupid
(In my opinion)
I'm listing REUs in my CV
What do I list for "textbook used" if my professor didn't use one/used papers
None of my professors used textbooks so I just put one of the recommended textbooks
just list the paper you used ^_^
There's like 7 lol
Fair enough
I'm getting all my apps done today
King
It's not my first rodeo for apps
Should I list courses taken outside my university that aren't graded?
For example, PCMI summer school
You probably should somewhere
The question is where
I think some schools have a section for that in their application, otherwise maybe put it as a separate section on your CV?
Where should I mention that I have taken and passed qualifying exams at my undergrad university for places that have you submit courses separately?
Honestly the best (if unsatisfying) answer to most of these questions is "ask your advisor"
Statement of purpose
yeah i was working under 3 profs once.. sadly chose the wrong ones to continue with... (ditched one of em and they would have been the best for my university applications since they are more well known)
but he himself kinda didnt care about the project so..
would anyone pls be willing to give me feedback on my SoP?
(i assume i shouldnt share it here out in public and dm instead, at least thats what people tell me)
what are these?
did you apply through the US government to have a job at your university
in order to receive federal financial assistance for tuition
pinging
it's a FAFSA program which gives financial aid for an on-campus job
I mention it early in my personal statement
that might come in your letters of rec as well
I just added it to the courses list document
Do you guys think they're gonna care that I included that even though its not a course?
is it ok if I list courses currently in progress as "completed' on my CV since there's only like, a week left in the semester and they'll be completed when my applications are being read
but put the grade as "Awaiting"
If an app has a place for work experience, is it ok to cut and paste descriptions from my resume that they are also receiving?
I’d assume so but they could be weird
dont they ask for your transcripts?
If I am submitting a graduate transcript (one semester’s worth) in addition to an undergraduate transcript (a degree’s worth), is it worth chancing schools where my undergraduate GPA is below their cutoff, or will my undergraduate GPA automatically kick me out the race? (My graduate GPA is of course well above the cutoff)
Some of the schools are asking me for a resume instead of a CV
Is it fine to just submit my CV?
Yes
Is it a bad idea to talk about only one faculty member in my personal statement?
I'm interested in many things (and I express that), but this one professor does stuff that I'm currently really interested in so he stands out
I wouldnt limit myself to one faculty if there are others that align with your interests.
I dont think it matters too much
If they're a large part of the reason you're applying and you know for a fact they're taking students you should mention them
If you express your current interests and mention that Professor it will be obvious they align well with your current interests
But yeah as Jek said you don't need to spend much time talking about the professor beyond just saying you'd be interested in working with them.
Unless you have something substantial to say
I know it's not generally a good idea to propose a specific research topic in grad school applications, but what if I'm applying to a school where there are professors whose research interests intersect with my topic proposal for the GRFP? Would it be a good idea to at least give a passing mention of "this is a project that I'd be interested in working on, though I'd be interested in working on other things too"
How about something like this?
At [school] Professor X stands out because of my interest in M. Since [school] has a strong department in Y and Z, I will have plenty of opportunities to explore research in Y and Z as well.
M is much narrower than Y and Z
The main problem I'm having is that there are too many people working in Y and Z and I don't know enough about the field to say who would be a good fit
I'm saying
I am aware that [PROFESSOR] does research on Blah. I would thus be very interested in working with them on a project along these lines. There is a natural generalization of [MY PRIOR WORK] which has a link to X, a topic I know [PROFESSOR] has done research on. Thus one potential project I’d be interested in would be to explore this link in more detail. However I foresee myself being interested in a wide range of possible projects.
I wouldnt
yeah I am very much on the line on whether to include that
probably I'll just cut it then
What are your opinions on my thing?
This
I guess its fine. Id get other opinions. You really should be asking the people that are writing your letters of rec.
Does graduate math involve a lot of memorization?
What should I do if I am not good at memorizing theorems and it's proofs?
I wouldnt say it involves memorization, but you have to be able to remember things. The goal is to understand proofs or key ideas/techniques in a proof. Not rote memorization.
You should try to understand the theorem statement, why its important (in the context of your class). Understand the proof, key ideas, why the assumptions made in the theorem statement are required etc.
just ooc how important is research on application for math grad school?
i dont have a lot of research but i have some p decent internships that are a bit higher than faang tier
No
Thnx
just about to make my donation to Berkeley
a lot of people dont have significant research, but it can help a ton. I dont think non-research internships will matter much.
there it goes
Wow on giving tuesday
thanks Berkeley wallet's crying now
Make sure to get that tax deducted
I'm glad I didn't have to do the GRE as well
that would've been another few hundred at least
I made Berkeley pay for my donation (used their money to go to the open house then rejected the offer)
what does citation here mean?
The citation for your paper
no. of citations, right?
no
i think write out the citation for your paper
its also optional. i wouldnt worry about it.
Something like this: Reingold, O., Vadhan, S., & Wigderson, A. (2002). Entropy Waves, the Zig-Zag Graph Product, and New Constant-Degree Expanders. Annals of Mathematics, 155(1), 157–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3062153
nice paper btw 👍
is it the application? or something else?
Presumably yes considering how expensive UC schools have become to apply to
yes
Yeah i understand the issue
What i struggle with is that it's too abstract to grasp in few weeks
And i m supposed to be familiar with(or memorize) 20 theorems/properties and their proofs for an exam
Since i am struggling with it Am I supposed to even be in such a program?
This is not really appropriate for this channel, it probably fits better in #math-discussion or #advanced-lounge
Right...i was wondering where to ask it
Thank you
what does one say when following up with to a professor you've talked with about their school's graduate program to let them know you applied
like
Hi Professor Blah,
I am following up again to mention that I have submitted my application to [SCHOOL].
and then what do I say to close out the message that doesn't sound weird as fuck??
I guess like, "I look forward to your response"? Maybe?
"if you don't let me in I'll cry"
"I look forward to receiving your acceptance"
"think very carefully about how you proceed"
"just thought I'd share the tea"
what if I know for a fact that this professor will have some influence on reviewing the applications
Just let them know you applied and thank them.
Yeah, the thanking part is important I feel
Just express that you appreciated their correspondence over the last however long and you have applied to … university
Oh shit I didn't even think about that. I guess I should thank the one person who responded to my emails 
I didn’t email any professors beforehand 
oh also congrats on honorable Kirby
My graduate application experience was very scuffed bc I didn’t know anything about the process
Oh thanks :)
oh wait and there are pronoun roles too?
I didn’t know NSF was a thing and stuff like that
Yeah, in #info
Yeah we just added them today!
nice!
It’s funny I didn’t talk with anyone who applied to schools until after the application process ended, and I realized I did a ton of things suboptimally
But I got lucky in the end, and here I am :)
ok so what about like
Hi Professor Blah,
I am following up again to mention that I have just submitted my application to [SCHOOL]. I look forward to hearing back. Thank you again for our prior correspondence.
I think that’s fine
I would be greatful if you could assist me in improving my chances for an admit if possible. Hope/looking forward to work with you. Thank you. Regards. (Ofc only say this if the university is okay with it)
Man.. the more I talk to more and more people on this topic, the more I realise everyone has different mutually exclusive opinions. U likely did fine
I mean, if you got where you want to be “suboptimal” doesn’t seem to be the appropriate descriptor.
Do not say that
You're probably right, I know everything was good enough in the end, but of course there's just a lingering feeling of things I could have done better to reduce stress levels if I had talked through my applications with people who were also in a similar situation like with what's happening in this channel
Not applying for NSF if you are eligible while you are applying during undergrad is objectively suboptimal I would say
Yeah, especially because it was because I didn't know it didn't exist until I saw people talking about it after the application period
yeah this is like you're asking for an unfair advantage
if the prof is excited about your application they'll push your file but probably won't take kindly to you telling them to do that
like the guy I emailed at Princeton said he can push for particular applicants in his area who look promising but ultimately the decision is up to a smaller group, probably similar elsewhere
I think this was already discussed here at some point, but what is a reasonable way to email a potential advisor? Like what subject line to use, details to give, etc.?
Okay yes, that's one thing that is suboptimal
I have heard similar. Some professors replied that they are not part of the admissions committee but they will be asked their opinion if you mention them in your SOP
how much of an impact of non-math courses on my gpa will impact phd apps?
Usually not too much
Some applications will have separate places for overall gpa and math gpa
Probably a long shot but is anybody else here applying to the Northeastern PhD program? I'm trying to submit my application and for some reason it wipes my program selection and it only lets me select the MS option now
Application's due on Dec. 1 so it's not like I missed the deadline or anything
Was just wondering if anybody else had the same problem and/or found a way to circumvent it
Why do some schools ask you to write a personal statement on top of the academic statement?
The personal statement is just BS
Hold up isn't it due on Dec 31
Ye there website says Dec 31
Will be applying there, though I haven't tried submitting it yet
?
