#graduate-applications
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
I mean if it's a Unicode character or whatever it should be fine, right?
Unless they somewhere specify to use alphanumeric only, which they might
Does applications made in the early deadline increase your chances of admission or they just get you an early decision?
does unpublishable research experience increase the chances of being admitted ?
Is there any reason to talk about a research project in my personal statement if one of my letter writers is going to talk about it anyway?
Yes
Yes
in the case of not being a math undergrad
are rec letters from professors assrting that i indeed have the enough prerqeuisites enough?
and is that common? ( i think it is )
Can you explain why? I can't think of anything that it would add.
But applying for math grad school? What did you do in UG? When you can provide sufficient evidence that you check the prereq boxes it shouldn’t be a problem. This is not subjective though and a professor thinking that you do doesn’t mean that you actually do evidence wise
well
they put me through the undergrad tests in analysis/algebra and topology
i did very well and supposedly this is what going to be said in the rec letters
i am doing cs
third year
and now they recommended i meet up with a prof and ask if i could do research with anybody
supposedly this should give me good chances of being admitted somewhere good?
I guess, in the end you just have to apply and see where it goes
yea just want to have expectations thats all
and was asking if my case is common
i think it is
Does mentioning a publication in a journal which is far from the top and in an area which is not very very directly related to the area I am applying for have a negative effect? At the time I submitted it, I had little idea about which journals are well-regarded and what would be the best place for this work (which is not important or clever, but since someone had asked this question explicitly in an article, I felt I should not let it go unanswered). In retrospect, I was reckless and foolish and should have asked someone who worked in that area for their advice. At this point, I just want to know if I should mention it at all in my cv for the applications. This is something I won't be mentioning at all in my statement anyway since this was a one off thing unrelated to what I wish to do for a PhD.
well i mean as long as its published work that is legit and also not on vixra
i think you will be fine
unless its like, a journal with a horrible reputation
undergrads wont be producing good research as a rule of thumb so like, i dont think there is any reason they will hold it as a negative
My personal opinion, but if somebody "brags" about having published in an application, and it is a bad journal, it will very much be a negative. But if it is just mentioned in passing and maybe a short description what it was about it is fine.
hmm i see
Is there a place to look up what journals are bad?
ask people who know? 🙂 search for journal name + predatory
what is the name of the journal?
Integers
Integers is a refereed journal devoted to research in combinatorial number theory and additive combinatorics. There are other journals that touch on these fields; we are the only one that is dedicated entirely to these topics. We welcome original research articles in combinatorics and number theory, with a preference for those that have a conne...
de gruyter is legit so i assume that one is ok
Yes
I do not know the subject or journal, but seems ok to me
I would not jump to the conclusion that it is bad if somebody had an applation where this was mentioned
why do you think it is a bad journal?
I don't think it is a bad journal, just that I learnt today it ranks closer to the bottom end of scopus indexed journals in combinatorics.
But I don't know how important or meaningful these rankings are. Though the ones at the top like JCT and Combinatorica are definitely very good.
Anyone having any idea on this
this is fine, it is not predatory. you should definitely mention this in you application.
Thanks
be proud of it 🙂
well for one you know a journal is bad if you can look atthe math and it makes 0 sense
for 2 (and some are really upset to admit this for obvious reasons) but at the graduate level, school does matter. your professor pedigree matters. the caliber of your research matters and respectively, the journal where you research is published matters. bad journals while i wouldn't necessarily call them "bad" are essentially UNRECOGNIZED at the level of tier 4 below
so take that as you will
but fi your applying to grad school there is no bad research. research experience there is just experience in higher level math and you should 100% list it in any application you send in, best of luck!
Talk about what you learned from the experience, how it influenced your decision to pursue grad school, your approach to the problem, etc. If you don’t mention it but your letter writer does, it has the chance of coming across like you weren’t a very active participant or didn’t like it very much, which could be a red flag. You’re (presumably) going to grad school to do research, it makes sense to talk about research!
My advisor told me mainly to look at the editorial board and who runs the paper, this one has good names (Andrews, Chung, Gowers, Granville, and Ruzsa to name a few)
I'm writing about a particular proof I found very elegant that exemplifies my love for a subject in my SOP, and i'm wondering how much I should pontificate about the actual details. like if writing a few lines about the actual point of the proof is too much
Also, I know I should suck up to them about why their phd program is great for me but what do I say if I literally just have 1 guy I wanna work with
This is for grad apps, right? I think its good to include. Keep it brief, tho. A few lines is okay
💀🗿
Do you really wanna put all your eggs in one basket (one potential advisor)? You have to explain why their grad program is really good for you.
Yea
I don't really have a choice. My area of interest usually only has 1-2 people per uni
At most
Some have none (not applying to those ofc)
Like there's people I might be able to pivot to but i'm much less excited about those options in most places
I don't really have a choice if I wanna do noncommuative algebra
Ofc i'm gonna talk with the advisor and their potential students a lot before making my final decision
Of the places i'm accepted
Started talking to some profs already
hmm i kind of have a similar thing where the mode maybe of the schools im applying to with operator theorists is like, 3
do you think you could state your other options but make it clear you strongly prefer the non com alg stuff
thats probs what ill do
oh i see oof
At least as far as my interests go rn
Might change once I actually get there but idk
I think that's a bit of a long shot
Which is why I wanna get as much info as I can on the vibe of ppl, but otherwise most of these places I'm applying cuz of a particular prof
yeah thats tough, all i can say is maybe focus on schools where the 2nd options are atleast palatable to you, but maybe thats hard bc of the niche field
by the way im gonna email all the specific profs i want to work with to know if they are going to be taking students
probably a good idea if theres only 1 or 2 ppl you wanna work with at an uni to do
That's what i've been doing
I need to keep doing it
I got like halfway through my list
nice, yeah i need to start doing it lol
honestly i have barely started my grad app 
I worked on sop a bit tofay
i would suck up to that person and make it clear that they should show the application to them
idk
If anyone is applying for the NSF GRFP in an applied math field, I'd be happy to discuss/provide feedback
I'm applying!
I have a very rough draft of my research statement and I'm gonna write my personal statement tmrw
In an applied math area though?
What subject area are you applying for?
Oh
Yeah so really it's up to you whether you are applying in applied math or not
For NSF at least, there is a good level of granularity and you can specify multiple discplines
No
@shell kindle help
Ok I just finished eating
Ok so
(are you applying for nsf)
The NSF GRFP personal statement has a prompt doesn't it
Oh I see
Well you know that you need to discuss intellectual merit and broader impacts right
So the way I set mine up was:
- Why I like applied math
- Research experiences 1 and 2, and the intellectual merits thereof
- Research experiences 1 and 2, and the broader impacts thereof
- Service/leadership/mentorship and broader impacts
- Future goals
yeah thats a nice overall structure
So hm
I should adress why I like number theory in the first part of my essay right
Instead of just giving a history of my formative experiences?
You should address why you like number theory
The reasons you like number theory may be related to formative experiences, or they may not be
Generally one recommends starting on NSF in August/September but now is better than never!
Its better to talk about specific illustrative examples instead of trying to list all your qualifications
Nice!
lesgoooo
I'm planning on applying to M.S. programs in Data Science/Statistics during the 2023 application period, and the only thing I'm really nervous about is asking for letters of rec. I have some classes I did very well in, but I never really got close with the professor(s). How would one go about asking for a letter of rec from a professor, whose course I took 1-2 years ago?
Generally, I think apps open around August/September, so I have some time, but I want to start thinking about it early
Just send them an email! Something along the lines of, "I'm applying to MS programs next year... Would you be willing to write me a letter of rec when I apply?" Worst case is that they say no. If they don't remember you, they'll at least have records for how well you performed in the class, and they can include information about the way they structured their class and how impressive your performance was
If you've already graduated, I think it's probably best to reach out to them now while they still potentially remember you, rather than closer to the application deadline. you can always get them to agree to it now, and then remind them about it a few months before apps are due or something
also can i ask for some advice for the grad school personal statement 🥲
i have a draft written and im trying to improve my intro but im stuck flip flopping between a kinda cliche (but genuine) "i got into math when i took an honors calc class freshman year" and a very to the point "i'm interested in geo/top and wanna work with prof A + prof B"
is it bad to like talk about my background in how i became interested in grad school? i feel like i've seen a lot of advice saying that but it also just seems like the most natural way to start my statement lol
hmm yeah that sounds like a reasonable approach maybe ill try to write something like that
i think im just overthinking
I think I finished my research proposal eee ^^

I am extremely stuck trying to even start writing an SOP. It doesn't help that I didn't do my masters thesis in maths. So, I am guessing the most important thing I have to explain is why I wanna pursue maths? Should that be the main point of the SOP? What else can I add?
Is there anything else you feel like you can write about? Did your masters thesis involve math at all? For me the most helpful advice has been to use examples to illustrate what you want to say about yourself. What I did was write out a chronological list of all the things that i could potentially write about, such as classes, research, self-study, etc., and then selecting 2-3 things from there that i felt like were really worth expanding on.
it might be useful to write about why you want to pursue math, especially if youve had a unique path that led you here. But most people are just doing grad school cuz they like math, so its much better to really prove to them you like math by going through examples of what youve done
also maybe i should mention that im applying to grad school in america rn, so im not sure how relevant my advice is if you arent american
I mean my actual degree was an integrated masters but ML was on the hype and so I did my masters thesis in that and although my evaluation committee had maths proffs, cause of covid I couldn't actually present my work. Other than that I have taken all courses a maths student would take
makes sense. I'll try to compile a small list and answer the questions by exemplifying on what I did
what's the longest acceptable length for a statement of purpose
yea for grad schools
If they didn't I assumed a default max length of 1000 words I think
Some places specified lengths as short as 500 words, and some went up to 1500
wow
ok
I don't think i've seen any length requirements
but 500 is extremely short
should I mention that I reached out to specific faculty members already
I think UCLA was 500 words?
Presumably you have a statement of purpose and a research statement right
most places only have a personal statement
from what i've seen
most places i'm applying to
I don't think i've seen a research statement?
I think every place I applied to had two statements
If you only get one statement I think 1500 words would be fine
huh ok
that's a very weird disparity
but maybe that's because the schools you applied to focused on different kinds of maths? I really don't know
I don't think so
Are you applying to US schools or European schools
All of the places I applied to were large departments with people working in all areas of math
Curious
most places i'm applying to have smaller, more specialised departments
?
Oh whoops
Yes, I would mention it
Usually you would want to write something like "blah blah blah these are my research interests. X, Y, and Z professors at [school] have similar research interests, and I have reached out to professors [subset of {X, Y, Z}]"
I'm going to be applying for a masters in statistics and I have been stuck on the 'career goals' section. I plan to do a PhD after- and want to stay in academia, do research. What exactly should I write about?
Do you want to do a phd in stats or some closely related field?
Yeah in stats although I'm interested in pure mathematics too
Ok well then for career goals, you should talk about how doing a masters would prepare you to do a phd and how you want to do research in academia
Is it a bad idea to get anonymous grad application review, if not, any of you willing to review an NSF research proposal and provide feedback?
ask your letter recomendation writer
not stranger on internet
why you care if anonymous
profs typically write one letter like per student per application season right?
like it's fine to be like "oh btw can you send this letter here too?"
@small moat hoping for slightly more polished version before I send to my recommendation writers
why
Hoping for a more polished version before sending to rec writer is reasonable I would say
You might check if your school is running NSF application workshops?
Lots do
Alternatively, you can see if your institution has something like a writing drop in consultation center
but research proposal need some math knowledge to read i think
so maybe not worth delaying for too many days
if cannot find osmeone to read
assuming issue is mathematic content, and not writing skill
I don't think the issue is math content
I’m using my institutions writing center for personal statement and resume review. I’m already tasking my rec writers with writing my rec letter, want to provide them decent material and proposal for rec writing. It’s a three day weekend here so trying to get some perspective from this knowledgable community. This is more a general, engineering focused expansion of typically math heavy discipline (image processing)
I’m having peers review my stuff, they provide undergraduate level review in not math/eng background. Desire increased education level of perspective
should not be much extra work for writers to read two page exposition
they are professional mathematician?
probably can skim in ten minute
Fair, they are indeed professionals. My content is definitely lacking though and I’d prefer to work out major issues before bringing to them
Ty guys
well we cannot rewrite entire background for your own research proposal
who gave you research topic in first place? ask that person for help perhaps
Ideally you're picking your own research topic for nsf
Even for maths
People applying for nsf are also applying for grad school
You need to at least have a general idea of what you want to do
anyway student learn the relevant background in a course probably, so professor in that course can help ?
yes but it is different to have precise research problem
Lots of people are also applying while their in grad school
that all i mean
I’m applying for graduate school, my work requires me to get a scholarship for them to allow me to attend. this research proposal is related to previous and current work I’m doing but definitely at next level, expansion of current research and knowledge in field. It’s for engineering but it appears difficult portions of the topic I selected are math based
My main issue is while developing my proposal, it seems like this is not something achievable through 2 years of graduate study
Do you have recommendations for broader impact section? Rn I have specific alternate applications which are lifesaving, and touch on unimaginable future ML/AI capabilities given an drastically increased data collection mechanism
What subject area are you applying in?
You want your broader impacts to be reasonable and not too out there
If you're applying in a math subject, you'll also want to touch upon opportunities for mentoring undergrads
It's weird but math people expect it because pure math subjects never have compelling broader impacts
ECE, image processing mobile sensor subject
Undergrads/hs students outreach is mentioned in my personal statement essay tho
Is anyone interested in studying for the Math GRE together? I’ve worked my way through “Cracking the Math GRE,” and I’m looking for people to study questions from past exams with.
I am interested, although there's less than 3 weeks left
That's essentially what you have to do in an academic career after the PhD anyway, each time you write a grant proposal. Might as well get in the habit early.
having an academic career is writing letters
The tradeoff is that you spend more time teaching
But yes math is less reliant on grant applications
My experience is from theoretical CS, which is like math in that all you really need for conducting research is a desk and a computer. So grant applications are less vital than in, say, experimental physics. Still they took a lot of time and effort -- pretty much all funding for postdocs and PhD students came from grants, and a big proportion of funds for conference travel too.
when the GRFP says:
The names of three (3) Reference Writers are mandatory
Two (2) reference letters (from non-family members) are required for applications to be reviewed
do I actually need 3 references?
or is it alright to have 2 + 1 effectively dud?
uhhh to be totally honest I just forgot I needed 3 up until right now 💀
I think I can get one, but I'll have to ask a prof who I have reason to suspect that he not like me as much as I thought he did or a new prof I've known for 2 months
ok that's a bit of a relief then
idk the former prof moved to a new school and sent his new contact info to a bunch of students but I was not included on this
it's possible he just forgot and I'm reading too much into this
but social anxiety 👐
up to 5 for the grfp
right yeah
right, that's a good point
do american grad schools genuinely consider recomm letters from military ppl as worth smth?
i might as well as make use of the time wasted in conscript if thats the case
As far as I remember they consider LORs from your employers if you have been out of studies for 2 years or more.
In general, you should check with the university and ask say the graduate admissions councellor
doing some asking around it sounds like its more or less either an urban myth or smth thats gone out of fashion
makes sense ngl
would an undergrad in cs be a plus if one is admitting into a more mathematical logic program?
How do you do a CV for grad apps; in particular
- Do you do bullet points like a resume?
- How do you do bullet points for research?
- How do you do bullet points for teaching?
Bullet points are fine
This is the latex package I used
You can find some templates on overleaf I think
Anyways bullet points to list everything is fine, but for things like research, teaching, and service/leadership, you'll want to write some brief descriptions of what you did for each of them as well
microsoft word just tried to suggest "blockchain" in my GRFP research statement

it's not even a cs project...
I was typing "let X form" and it was like "let X form the blockchain"????
Should I have a back up plan for if I dont get into the 10 grad schools I apply to?
And when do I start preparing? Now?
Im working on SOP now
but backup plan
i might want to work in energy sector if this gradschool stuff doesnt work out
also ideally I want a job I can get for next semester in the spring
What's the right way to render math in the research statement for NSF?
@shell kindle @fierce sigil
I didn't have any latex'ed math in my research statement
If you do want to include latex'ed math, you can latex it and then screenshot and then put it in the document
No equations at all?
No equations at all
In my research statement i constantly make reference to function F_k,D and H_k,D. Do i have to put in screenshots for every instance of that? 💀
Ok ill use subscripts for that
You can do it with cambria math if you want with xelatex I think
that's what I have so far
they do recommend screenshots though so I might refactor when I actually submit
The pdf submission is very scuffed so I would definitely recommend keeping your pdfs simple
yeah IDK why they do that
For the NSF "teaching/work experience" I'm writing down like my TA work bc I think that should count, but should I also include REUs? They are paid positions and there doesn't seem to be another place on the form to list them
It won't hurt
Alt plus = for new equation in Word
A lot of tex commands like \in, \forall, \subset, etc automatically replace themselves with the symbol in that environment. Other characters you can do via Unicode input
How would the statement get thrown out for formatting? Wouldn't their automated system let you know when you try to upload it?
I don't actually know if the pdf distiller thing checks for the actual formatting
What exactly do you mean by formatting?
Well you need a specific font size right
Surely it checks font, fontsize, and page count
Does it
That's what I thought?
Last year when I applied I had a lot of trouble with it but my formatting was all fine
What do you mean had a lot of trouble
It wouldn't accept my pdf
What did it say
I don't remember
I'm a bit worried because I have Word equations literally everywhere
What I had to do was to re-export my pdf in adobe acrobat as an archival pdf thing
And I sometimes switch between using italics and Cambria math equations for math letters
Like I'll write "let A be the set..." and then later put like \forall a \in A in an equation
How did you possibly manage that
I see
That is very much not the case for me
Ohh
Right
The fuck does it check then
Lol
what if they just let me submit a pdf with a certain page count and then had ppl read it
rar
I’ve often heard it is best to have grad school recommendation letters written by professors who are well known/ respected in the mathematical community.. how would one know which professors fit this description vs which do not?
How much they've published, how old are they, what awards/prizes they've won, etc...
But in my experience, professor prestige is secondary to how well they know you
That makes sense, ty
Frick I didn't know the intellectual merit portion was like a required section and not just suggested and my proposal is already fairly long
does anyone have an example intellectual merit section btw? The people whose NSF apps I've looked at did not have such a section
It isn't so much a section as a way to represent your accomplishments/suggested research plan
If you want I can email you my statements and they have like clearly marked intellectual/broader impact sections
And you'll see that it isn't so much explicitly talking about intellectual merits, more discussing the intellectual merits of past research experiences and the intellectual merits of the research plan
But yeah intellectual merits and broader impacts are important because they're how the NSF evaluates all of their grant applications
For sure
that would be great :)
If I could send you my current research proposal that would also be helpful so I can like orient how I should think of things
Usually a bunch of the stuff you already have can just be shoved under "intellectual merit"
The entire personal statement is basically describing intellectual merit anyway
(I've consulted with Faye)
I hadn't noticed
In dms
just to clarify superscripts and subscripts are allowed in the grfp statements right?
They better be, but I should check with them to be sure...
Also need to know what's the proper way of citing things on the nsf
let me know what they say
you can probably look at previous winning statements for this
there's a bunch here https://www.alexhunterlang.com/nsf-fellowship
Don't rely on my to get your information 💀
I mean I'll obviously check myself too
should I mention specific influences in my GRFP statements?
I'm talking about a talk I saw shaping my mathematical outlook and interests and I don't know if I should keep things vague or if I should specifically mention the lectures name and such
I feel like being specific would be good but I'm not sure
Does anyone know whether the gre subject test scaled scores are calculated based on the number of answers answered correctly or the percentile scores?
Does anyone have a good resource or guide to applying to American grad schools as an international applicant? The entire process seems contrived to me (about applying for aid/funding in particular) so some outline would be nice.
Usually you do not need to apply for separate funding
You will be funded by teaching
These people applying for external funding hope to use it to avoid teaching
seconding this
I don't think the process is fundamentally different than applying to US grad schools as someone in the US
There are just some additional steps
I had a post a while ago in discussion2
Actually, this was in discussion
Oh this was general advice about applying to grad school , I don't have any any advice for international students specifically, my bad
Thank you!
Ah, okay
what things do I need to cite on the grfp statements? Do I need to cite definitions and theorems that are standard in a field but not widely known outside it?
the issue is I only have so much space for references because of the 2 page limit
Well if you're making reference to a specific result you might wanna cite it
Idk its kinda just vibes I feel like
Also if you make reference to a single paper multiple times, that's a good indication to cite it as a reference because it saves space to have one citation at the end rather than spelling out the authors name and paper title through out your statement
well I mean something like "It is known that foo is connected to bar via the yarrharr lemma" where foo, bar, and the yarrharr lemma are known to everyone in the field but not to every mathematician
standard definitions in the field
I mean like an example would be dividing lines
or possibly something a bit more obscure
the kind of thing that everyone in the field knows and you would find in somewhere between some and all books on the topic but you could get through grad school never touching if you aren't in that field
also re: this, I looked at previous winning statements and they had subscripts and superscripts so it should be fine
well I'd be saying why they are important in my statement
like I'd be telling the reader what they need to know and why they matter in a way that's aimed at a non-specialist, the concern is more on the level of proper academic form and avoiding plagiarism
obviously I don't need to cite the definition of a group, and obviously I should be citing some obscure definition that was introduced in a paper last year, but where is the line? Because I think I have a good sense of where it is if I was writing a journal paper, but if I used that approach here I'd have far too many citations
the example (previous winning) statements I'm looking at have like 2-4 citations each but I'm currently looking at 6+
and I could maybe fit 6-7 but any more than that would cut too heavily into the statement itself. And even 6-7 would be pushing it quite a bit.
that's the plan
I had 3 citations
I did not cite field specific definitions or things
I only cited major results
I'm going to need to cite more than that since my work is explicitly building on a few previous papers
so I'll need to cite those in addition to a couple important papers in the field
that's probably around where I'll be
how hard is the grfp to get
The grfp is hard to get I would say
is it like around 14% of applicants get it? And I imagine most of the applicants are good candidates considering the work required
Especially if you aren’t in a funding priority area
Everyone else gets to be et. al
pure math isn't a priority I imagine
oh also for citations in math papers can I choose who goes before the et al?
since there's no notion of first author and instead everyone is listed in alphabetical order
like if I want to emphasize my name or an advisor's name
well not in this context
what if there are too many names to cite
why does math not have first authorship...
seems a bit silly tbh
that's the case elsewhere in the application but not for the statements
if I ever end up transitioning and changing my name I will change my last name to AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
or alternatively
anyways what should I do for broader impacts on the research statement
I'm talking about teaching and stuff for the personal statement so do I just say that again but shorter? Or is it worth trying to spin my topic so it sounds like it has an application?
I guess that depends on my specific topic. I'm looking at something that could plausibly have tangential real-world applications, though not any that I care about.
washingbear are you applying to the GRFP this year or did you apply in the past?
It is very good in math that it is alphabetical, I refuse to write papers with engineers etc that start talking about the nonsense of author ordering.
this is one of the best things about math. first authorship is toxic
My opinion will probably change on this later, it would just be nice if people could tell at a glance which papers I worked more on. Since I'm on a bunch of papers where I did basically nothing and then one paper with a bunch of authors where I did the majority of the work.
I suppose it all evens out in the end though
And I imagine it would be turbo toxic if two people both did lots of work and both wanted first author. Which I imagine is a very common situation higher up in academia.
Why
Oh is that how it works
People spend so much time on that nonsense that it is ridiculous.
I'm very glad there is none of that first author last author nonsense in math
Math folks keep it 100
Alphabetical for the win
for the GRFP is it bad if my research plan isn't related to my stated interests in my personal statement? like my research plan is about my undergrad research but i'm not really interested in pursuing this area in grad school
It's not ideal. It would be better if you tried to tie them together
You do not actually need to do any research plan you propose
But also my research plan was not related to my undergrad research
But I also had an advisor write a letter of rec to back me up on the new research plan
hmm i see
was your research plan about concrete ideas you had for something?
because i feel like the only research i could concretely write about would be stuff ive already done as an undergrad, but that was just combinatorics 😢
Yes my research plan was reasonably concrete
i could maybe twist it a bit since it was studying like geometric objects and i do say im interested in geometry
got it
Then write about it
i guess i will :')
i dont really expect to get it but at least ill have experience if i want to apply next year
I was in a similar place as you though fortunately I did end up find a way to tie my undergrad research with what I want to do in grad school. And the impression I got from talking to professors is that having your research plan be different than what you actually want to do is not great, but writing about something you don't know concretely is worse
that makes a lot of sense
ill try to look for a way to tie it in
ill probably just try to say that there is this geometric object i find interesting and im interested in this combinatorial approach
Is geometry what you want to do in grad school?
yeah
I mean maybe look at it this way
Your research statement has to include an intellectual merit section where you should talk about your research's connections with other areas of math
This the case anyways
right
Just use that area to stress the connections with the things you want to do
Combinatorics and geometry definitely have intersections so write about those
ooh ok yeah thats a good idea
i imagine in that section i dont have to be as like
concrete with what i say
compared to when i actually discuss what it is i want to research and how?
What might be a good thing to do is find past problems in geometry that have been solved via combinatorial techniques related to what you did at your REU
These past problems don't have to be the kind of geometry you personally want to do and the techniques don't have to be the exact thing you did just as long as they're related
thats really helpful thanks, i think i have a better idea now
Try to cite specific papers if you can. Ask your professors for help
See if you can squeeze in a last minute meeting or two in these last few days before it's due
i think ill try to ask my REU mentor :') since he does geometry
And definitely have a prof read it over before you submit if you can. They'll be able to tell you if what you've written is coherent or not
But yeah for intellectual merit you don't need to say how specifically your work will relate to geometry but you should give specific examples of how past combinatorial work in similar areas has related to geometry
If you already knew what implications and applications your work will end up having then you'd have finished it. But it's really important to mention what similar work has done so the people reading your statement know why they should care about your topic
right right, i will try to frame my plan along those lines or something similar to that. that's a lot better than what i originally had in mind
Your statement is in a sense a sales pitch. You're not just describing what you plan to do you're demonstrating why it's worth the government's money to fund you to do it
i asked my mentor a bunch about this but ill probably try to schedule a meeting with him to get some ideas on making my research sound compelling lol
Don't neglect the broader impacts section either
what do people generally write for that section? i imagine i cant say that this stuff is going to have any real world impact lol
In pure math broader impacts generally means your impact as a mathematician. Particularly teaching and mentorship
oh thats what i wrote for my personal statement
but the research plan also needs a broader impacts right
Yeah I'm not sure exactly what to do with that
ah ok haha
One thing I'm probably doing and you could do is mention that you might want to help run a REU relating to your topic
yeah i think the stuff i wrote for my personal statement is decently convincing so i can try to just incorporate my research with those things
and maybe talk about talks/conferences
Something along the lines of "this topic is accessible to undergraduate students. I was fortunate to be able to study this topic in an REU, and I plan to mentor undergraduates on it in the future"
What I wrote is poor phrasing but you get the idea
Dumb question: https://www.mathprograms.org/
Is this just like a catch all site for REUs and applying?
Full service online program application site for mathematical institutions worldwide, offered by the American Mathematical Society (AMS).
would this be the place to watch for REU apps that are opening soon?
Yes
Does anyone know anything equivalent for CS REUs for stuff like algorithms and even better, complexity theory?
afaik math is the only one with a centralized application website
the NSF website should have a list of REUs though
(Well... I suppose on technicality linguistic REUs have a centralized application service...)
Does some research experience in compsci help when applying for grad school in math? I got offered an opportunity to do some lab work with a robotics professor for a year who worked with me previously, but I don't think I would do it if it's not gonna help me since I want to focus on math now..any input is appreciated :/
pretty ambivalent right now
I'm a 3rd year undergrad btw
As someone in a similar situation, I've been told that it's better than no research experience
It'll lead to a good rec letter I presume
i don’t see how it would hurt you at all
what do I say about broader impacts in my research statement for the GRFP
there's a brief thing I can (truthfully) mention about a way my work could potentially have practical applications, but that's nothing more than a couple sentences. What else could I say?
Usually you say something about opportunities to mentor undergrads
that's what I think I'll end up doing
is it wrong to mention what I did specifically on an REU paper in my GRFP statement? In particular saying something like "theorems X and Y were primarily my work"?
Would it be better to instead say "theorems X and Y were my main contributions to the project"?
How long should my intellectual merits and broader impacts part be
I was initially planning on a page each + one page in neither section
but I'm thinking of actually making one of these longer to compensate for my shorter beginning part
I think either would be good
I'm doing roughly page and a half intellectual merit, page broader impacts, half page intro for my statement but I think there's a fair bit of flexibility.
Done? It's good to have a good draft around now in case your recommenders want to see it, but after that give yourself time to hone it to something you think is represents you accurately. In particular, you will probably slightly modify your statement to fit each school (in terms of their writing requirements and also in terms of what research is going on there) so you should get a general statement together early and then every few days / every week pick a school on your list and finish up their application requirements using your general statement.
I found that my original statement changed a good amount as I made these different slightly changed versions, cause I kept finding stuff I wanted to shift
So it was a helpful process for drafting
thanks for the advice im applying this rn
I'm really wondering how much I want to tailor to each school
it is a bit different considering I am not sold on an area to go into yet
Yeah
I got pretty specific, including a paragraph that was swapped out for every school that talked in depth about my fitness to work with 2 or 3 specific faculty there
I am probably most competitive for number theory (tm)
two top REUs in number theory + a modular forms topics class
But I have heard that that is not always smart
If you don't know exactly what you are talking about and that those people are taking students
I think it summarizes very well why I want to be a mathematician
Your personal statement will be the best when it is what you honestly wanted to write
yeah
Even if that is not super tailored to each school
plus--frankly--letters of rec and grades in top courses are vastly more important than personal statement
that is at least the impression I've gotten from everyone
Yes, I agree
The personal statement is more to gauge your personality and communication style in my view, which is why it's best to just write it from a place of mathematical excitement. If that includes what people are doing at the school, that's good, but it doesn't need to directly
The GRFP solicitation says
Do not provide links to web pages within the application, except as part of citations in the References Cited section.
What do I do if I want to mention a specific website in my statement that isn't for a citation? The website betterexplained.com played a large role in getting me interested in math education and I want to mention that when I talk about my plans for teaching.
I could just say "the website betterexplained"
Yeah you can discuss websites, just don't like them
me when I like a website in my GRFP statement (it is valuable social media exposure)
\textcolor{green}{👍}
what do I put here for the GRFP?
should I assume the readers are decently acquainted with my field or should I assume they are arbitrary mathematicians
They are arbitrary mathematicians
One sentence synopsis
ok 👍
They told me climate modeling did not have enough broader impacts so….
i would disagree with ange's advice
if you're very confident in your field, and think that your knowledge of the subject is a very strong part of your app, go all out
i was telling my grad schools i wanted to do forcing and large cardinals, and at times went into the nitty gritty. i promise you the people in charge of reviewing apps didnt know what the fuck any of it was
i know it just got forwarded to a logician
for most things, like if you're trying to do some kind of algebra or analysis, there will be enough people in it or a related area that they can make an informed decision. for pretty niche things it's a little different
What are some schools that do work in the intersection of algebraic topology and algebraic geometry (like motivic homotopy theory, K-theory, derived algebraic geometry)?
so like "I aim to do X using tools from Y and Z" or just listing the keywords X,Y,Z
I think everyone should do this. Helps identify and filter out the cranks.
A sentence
Which advice are you disagreeing with?
You should write technically but the people reading it might not know what’s going on is what I was getting at
I would say a professional mathematician can tell if someone knows what they are talking about whether or not they know the exact math itself
Most of the time
Hmmm ok so there's a topic I don't really understand, but it's somewhat important to talk about as background for what I do want to talk about for my research plan.
How can I approach this tastefully, just admit I don't understand the details?
well you have a few months before grada appa is due, i'd try to learn enough to be able to say stuff on the app before then tbh
well I have a couple days before GRFP is due 
What topic is it
Structural Ramsey theory
Unfortunate, I'm sorry for your loss
I mainly want to include it because it's one of the highlights of the intersection between logic and combinatorics, but I unfortunately don't know category theory well enough to explain the Ramsey property any better than just blindly parroting Wikipedia. When I go to read any real source I get quickly overwhelmed by all the category stuff.
Is it Ramsey theory in general or structural ramsey theory in particular that is the problem
structural ramsey theory in particular, I know the usual Ramsey theory stuff well enough to exposit that, but the structural Ramsey stuff is hard for me to untangle.
Actually, I think I do get the Ramsey property, maybe just trying to explain it with the current structure of the paragraph is not feasible.
Do you already include ramsey theory
And want to add on structural ramsey theory on top of it
Yeah, I'm trying to talk about the KPT correspondence as a particular successful contribution of model theory to combinatorics and topological dynamics
The Ramsey property is a bit involved, but in short says that for any finite coloring of copies of some substructure A of the Fraïssé limit, A, there exists a substructure, B, also of the limit with arbitrarily many copies of A all of the same color.
does this make sense?
this feels like gore to me
yeah
This turns out to be a specific example of a much broader phenomenon originating from model theory called a Fraïssé limit. The underlying idea of the Fraïssé limit is that given a countable collection of structures (with a few restrictions) you can construct a unique structure including each structure of the collection as a finitely generated substructure. What’s especially interesting about the Fraïssé limit though is that it connects to topological dynamics and Ramsey theory through what is known as the KPT correspondence [2]. This theorem states that the automorphism group of the Fraïssé limit is extremely amenable (i.e. every action has a fixed point) if and only if the collection the limit was taken over has what is known as the Ramsey property. The Ramsey property is a bit involved, but in short says that for any finite coloring of copies of some substructure A of the Fraïssé limit, A, there exists a substructure, B, also of the limit with arbitrarily many copies of A all of the same color.
full paragraph
I have run into the problem where I am waiting for my transcript, getting all my grades might only happen in the middle of november, but it seems that in some applications my letter writers can only submit after I have submitted the application
maybe I am misunderstanding
but this is a problem for me since the transcript currently doesn't show all classes I took this semseter
some of which I talk about in my SOP
What is your earliest deadline
1st dec
Wait so what is the problem?
You can submit after you get your transcript
And then your letter writers have 2 weeks to submit after that
It's not like they can't get started
Is it necessary to have the grades of the current semester in the transcript? Usually I only get them in the middle of December.
Anyone here who was torn between pure math and theoretical CS? Or maybe math and some other field?
how did you decide what to go to grad school for?
I can't decide between pure math and theoretical CS (something on the complexity side of things maybe, or algorithms idk)
and of course getting two phds at once isn't advisable lol (if only, then I wouldn't have to figure this out)
Nsf nsf nsf grfp grfp grfp
Depends on what you want to do post-PhD
I'm doing something interdisciplinary.
But I'm hoping to go into academia and don't care much about job prospects.
I also want to go into academia
I think I would be unhappy not teaching and doing research, currently I love doing both too much to not see myself doing it for the rest of my life
But like, I need to apply for something eventually right?
Can I apply to both math and CS phd programs even at the same school?
Math wise: algebraic stuff (going to take algebraic topology or geometry next sem, I think I'll like those)
CS wise: torn between algorithms and complexity
Some things seem to overlap like type theory and algebraic complexity theory
But nothing more on the more algorithmic side (although there is alot of overlap) and the only other thing I can think of is Cryptography which I don't really have an academic interest in
I don't really know how to find what's out there
All I get from people is "yea overlaps probably exist I'm not sure what that looks like though" which doesn't help with the whole finding professors thing
Well then why would I not apply for that different department in the first place
Ah
So then in that case I would still be a PhD student in one department
Just have an advisor and do research in another?
Depending on flexibility ofc
I guess this would mean I should find a place that's quite strong at both places
Wait you can have multiple advisors?
How is the different than doing multiple PHDs?
Yes, some places even recommend having multiple
I thought PHD was "I am working with this one advisor doing this one thing"
Somewhat off-topic but if you are interested in algorithms/complexity and algebra, you can look at some algebraic complexity (algebraic circuits, branching programs, etc.) or computational algebra (algorithms for various problems like factorization and matrix multiplication) and see if that looks interesting.
Oh you already mentioned algebraic complexity. Should read properly before saying anything.
Hmmmmm computational algebra I've never thought of that before but that makes sense tbh
Actually I've already been learning alot of matrix multiplication stuff in a course I'm taking on fine grained complexity
It does look interesting but I'm not sure what else is out there
Part of the issue is that the one prof in that area at my university is mildly MIA so I can't really go to them 💀
Oh yeah I have 3 advisors
My advisors have all been collaborators in the past but they are not really in the same area
One (my primary advisor) does numerics
One does atmospheric stuff
One does ocean stuff
I see
It works out because I am doing numerical methods for problems in atmospheric and oceanic modeling
So I discuss numerics with my primary advisor and application problems with the other two
oh that's neat
maybe if I do something that combines algebra and algorithms/complexity I could get an advisor in both
can you include links to papers on the GFRP in the section
List any significant academic honors, fellowships, scholarships, publications and presentations. (less than 16000 characters total).
Do not use special characters '{' and '}' in the text box.
I assume not because
should I just say "On arxiv" after listing my preprints then? I'm linking them in my statements since that's allowed.
I'm linking them in bibliography of my statements since they say that's allowed and past winning statements have done it. But I won't link anything on that section.
It does seem smart to say "on arXiv" though right?
yes
Preprints to some extent are viewed as "lesser" than publications because no peer review
Oh well if they're listed as preprints then no harm in saying on arxiv
Yeah
But if they weren't specifically noted as preprints but were only on arxiv then that may not be good
yeah I say
Preprints:
[1] Authors. Paper name. On arXiv.
[2] ...
That's fine
Solicitation says "do not provide links to webpagez within the application, except as part of citations in the References Cited section:
I'm just saying "on arxiv" to be safe
I list the authors and title and also provide links in my statements so they should be able to find it (or confirm it exists) easily if they want
Didn't the rules say that you can link in the reference list? The spirit of that rule seems to be "don't clutter your text with details of how to find stuff; that belongs in the reference list". Saying "on arXiv" would be such a detail that should go in the reference list instead, with the identifier.
(Or if it's important for the point you're making that what you speak about is an unrefereed preprint, then say "preprint" rather than depending that status being implicit in where-to-find-it).
Does anyone have example statements of purpose I could see? I'm writing some for some research internship applications and idk what they're looking for
This is a separate box to list awards, talks, and publications. It's not in the statements
That doesnt sound like a "References Cited section".
Which was mentioned here.
The references cited is specifically an optional part of the research proposal
I think that part of the solicitation might be referring to just the proposal, but I wouldn't risk it.
this nsf proposal very well might be the best fucking thing ive ever written


wtf are extracurricular activities
because I'm sure hobbies don't count for that
even though it sounds like it
?
I just want to know what that word means
I'm not a native english speaker
and the links online are kinda throwing me off
What are the links saying?
things that aren't part of the mandatory school program
that still somehow relates to school?
like what, that I was part of the flute club in 2nd grade?
(is this for an undergrad application)
more for like a job application
no I will not mention that I was part of the flute club
it's a bit weird, our uni has an event where we get multiple interviews a day, so in some sense "non targeted job application" if that seems reasonable?
but since I thought that this also goes in other forms of applications, I should ask here, but sorry if that's not the right spot
Ok I do not really think this is the correct place to ask but I'm sure people would be happy to answer in #discussion or #serious-discussion
Same here
Feels very good to have it submitted and off my back now
Right which is why I didn't provide links
Fuck i just noticed a typo in my research statement 
"There has been an resurgence..."
Fuck i didn't include the year of publication for one of my references

I found another typo in my personal statement

I found another typo in my personal statement


Whatever bro. I can't change it now
i don't think minor typos will really be noticed much
you tend to read over them when you've got a block of text with like one letter wrong
I think it's actualy very imporntant to make syre there arent any tipos. Somme people raelly care about such thngs.
Rip yamin
which universities have application deadlines in october/november for early admissions?
I don't know of any math programs with phd deadlines that early
I think the earliest I had when I applied was dec 1
? That’s what he answered. What do you mean postgrad
not phd
the one between phd and ug
Oh like masters then? I think if you have spring admission, deadlines are coming up/have past
Otherwise, the deadlines generally are the same
It’s not really math grad school but
Does retaking classes look bad for grad school apps?
I really want to get a Masters degree at the bare minimum but my grades aren’t the best and I’m not satisfied with my performance. I want to just retake some classes and relearn the material with a better grade, but that does mean I might end up graduating a bit later. Does that look bad?
After I finish my credits for mechanical engineering I want to do a minor in math too
I’m extremely passionate and self-motivated but I learn really slowly and suck at taking tests
are there some specific courses (beyond usual math major requirements) someone would be well advised to take if they intend to go to graduate school for math, in the sense that either it would help in preparation/ give an idea of what grad school is like, or that it would demonstrate to admissions like sufficient preparation for graduate work in math?
how come discrete/combinatorics/logic? that seems sort of random
do you know what you might want to do?
discrete is a common UG requirement and it's generally assumed that you've had an intro class in it
(abstract + linear) algebra/topology/analysis would be minimums, anything on top of that would be specific to your area I think
combinatorics isn't as necessary, and I don't think anyone really cares if you've taken a logic class, but really either of these could possibly replace a discrete course
The advice will be different if you want to do applied math as well
by discrete do you mean like graph theory? otherwise I guess i'm not too sure what that means
in the sense of like which specific area of math id like to specialize? not really, I am in year long courses in algebra/analysis/topology now and I enjoy topology the most but I suspect that is not enough to make meaningful prediction in what I would like to do
just general topology like metric spaces and such?
or algebraic
(i meant general/point-set topology in that post) - but yeah I'd say it's kind of hard to call because general topology isn't really something that's studied in its own sake, it more so appears in other places (pretty fundamental in analysis [a lot of it is just giving topologies to algebraic structures] and pops up in places in algebra too). "topology" in terms of PhD projects would probably mean algebraic topology which is a bit of a different flavour
the class that I thought most naturally carried on from general topology (with not much change to flavour) was functional analysis fwiw
discrete is generally a first year course that covers elementary set theory, graph theory, maybe some discrete probability or number theory
The course is like 1/2 point set topology and 1/2 fundamental group
ahhh so you'll get a flavour of whether you want to continue algtop then
The topology 2 class at my university is differential topology I think algebraic topology does not run too regularly
fair enough, should still give some indication whether it's your kind of thing
if you want to do more analysis I'd try to do a course in complex analysis and courses in measure theory/functional analysis maybe some PDE. not so sure about algebra
would demonstrate to admissions like sufficient preparation for graduate work in math?
as far as this part of the question goes, my understanding is that as long as you have some graduate courses under your belt as well as research, the "sufficient preparation for graduate work in math" box is pretty much checked.
Is it expected that you have research under your belt? 
Also worth mentioning that on <decisions website I can't remember if I'm allowed to mention> you see a lot of people with surprisingly minimal coursework getting into a non-zero number of good places
I think if you've done a thesis of some kind that can substitute somewhat
well, yes, we are talking about graduate school after all 
research is what its all about
But do you need to do research during undergrad?
yeah
fall admissions
as per the usual
if u completed it in the same time.. it wont really hurt ig. (tho it may not benefit much either) but if u spent 1 year extra JUST to improve ur GPA by retaking courses.. idk. likely doesnt sound the best
but if u just want any masters degree.. likely not an issue
its only an issue if u wanna get a masters degree at a competitive(ish) uni i reckon
(ofc these are just my thoughts.. feel free to ask others as well)
fall admission deadlines for early admissions are a bit earlier arent they?
is it better to apply in fall or spring?
I do not know of any early admissions for masters programs
Most people apply to begin in the fall
so does that mean more competition? or..
ok.. ill ask the question here again in case someone knows
Does anyone know about the admission deadlines for fall early admissions to master programs?
I am not sure. I don’t know too much about master’s admissions
i believe the answer is no, ie. I've seen profiles of ppl with just senior theses getting in
which is essentially all I have (well, I'll have 2) so fingers crossed lol
but I would think many of the people getting into like Harvard etc. will have publications
I got into grad school without any publications
where 👀
Michigan
My impression is that most people in my cohort did not come in with publications
I only meant like harvard mit princeton etc., could be wrong anyway
i was gonna put in a random hail mary application for MIT but I'm not sure if I'll bother, so maybe I could do without this attitude xd
It only makes sense to apply to places where there are faculty that you want to work with
ye there's only one person at MIT in my area, (who is probably too famous for me to work with) it's why I'm not applying to many "super-reaches"
I did not have any publications
how helpful is a really good GRE score?
is there a substantial difference in the eyes of graduate school between, say, 94th and 97th percentile?
94th vs 97th percentile won't really make a difference
No one ever got into grad school because of a good gre school, but plenty of people have been rejected for bad gre scores
ah, that's good to know
do grad programs still require or expect you to take the GRE? i thought it has gone more or less extinct
Some still do, but it is generally going extinct
thats a bit surprising, do you know some in particular?
It depends on how you interpret "research". Like, I doubt having publications is super important (at least I would hope not): i.e. It could be completely failed research (perhaps depending on the reasons for failure). More than anything, I think admissions just wants to see that you have some form of experience more than anything.
like, there is this one trope I've heard called the "professional course taker." This is someone who has taken and done well in many advanced courses, appears very prepared, but gets to grad school, and for one reason or another is not cut-out for research. PhD programs do not want to admit professional course takers.
I feel like I'm a professional course taker myself 
though I do guess I have some "failed research" experiences lol
Same lol coursework is probably the strongest part of my application
I'm always curious how bad "bad" is
particularly bc I did not do well on the gre by any means
It's less bad now that a lot of places are making it optional
But I also did not do bad enough to qualify as "oh god what happened" lol
yeah for sure
As for how bad it is
It just means that the rest of your application needs to be stronger
Mhm
Some schools are rumored to have hard cutoffs but those are mostly rumors I think
im a bit worried cuz i ended up with a publication at a meh conference (IEEE M2VIP with an h5-median of only 15)
cuz i worked on my profs project/paper instead of working on my own paper (on a slightly different topic)
but by the time i was done with that prof's paper.. deadline for most good conferences were over
now i can only submit to CVPR but wont get the decision before application deadlines anyways..
im the opposite 🥹
maybe u should take courses for me.. and i can do research for u 
just dropped my gpa hard cuz of this one course.. social network analysis
I think UCLA (??) said successful applicants typically have 80th+ percentile
Might be misremembering
perfect right on the border
i don't know how that could be considered bad lol
you see people with low double digits
also it was UCLA, they still have this line on their website
how likely do u think im to get into a top30 US uni for comp sci for masters as a male asian with 3.79 GPA, 336GRE, with a single publication at a meh conference, as someone who graduated from a no name local uni. and a few projects and a cool paper down the line (hasnt been published yet)?
not too likely huh? 🤔
Oh 80th percentile is perfectly doable
I don't think anyone here can speak to cs masters admissions
i think I've lucked out in not having to do it lol, did prevent me from applying to UCLA & penn state tho
I got 80th percentile on the gre
And considering other factors I think I did reasonably well
it's the sort of thing that should be easy but that i'd probably end up cocking up
Imagine not building your grad list around places that don't require GREs
I'm probably going to stay away from ones that require regular GRE I would have to drive a bit to take that. My schools gives the subject test though so I would do that
Yeah, keep in mind though that if there's a program you're interested in you can ask them to waive the GRE requirement too
A decent number of places are pretty understanding in that regard
i didn't have to, those were the only two I had to cross off because of it :p
Though I did almost cross off A&M, when I emailed they said that I wouldn't be auto-rejected cos of it
anyone have a good cv template for graduate admissions
I linked one some time ago
Hi! I have a niche question to ask, but hoping someone might know. Is there anyone here who I can talk to about comparing the differences between the California State universities in the LA area for a master's degree in math? Just wondering if anyone has experience with that. I'm comparing between CSUN, CSU LA, and CSU Long Beach
I would say its very likely.
well
thnx
that makes me feel less anxious
but idk how much i trust a talking mango 🤔
Well its a lemon
Masters arent as competitive as PhD programs. You have a decent gpa and research experience. If you have good letters you should be pretty competitive
hmm
Everything in CS is miserably competitive though
hopefully by phd ill have a paper in CVPR
oof yeah.. dont remind me..
I am in a cs phd program so i am familiar w the application process
some people go into bio and then re-assign to comp sci once they get in
so u think id be able to get into good unis with what i have?
tbf im also not a citizen and from a no name uni.. so that def doesnt help
ig all i can really do is apply.. but i was wondering if it was even worth applying to such high ranking unis with my profile in the first place
didnt wanna waste too much money
Being an international makes it harder i guess. If your letters are good then you should be pretty competitive.
works especially well for undergrad
my sis did that
big brain move
That does not happen for masters/phd programs
You have a good gre too
they are good but only one will be from a comp sci prof since i have mostly worked under non compsci people
i can likely also get an LoR from commissioner/home minister of my state
ik yeah sadly lol
Idk i would talk to the comp sci professor you worked under and see what they recommend.
i havent kinda
but yeah will see ig
most people say that as long as u have one comp sci prof and the stuff the LoR writers say is good.. it will be good. not sure tho
my major advisor said it doesnt even matter if its a comp sci prof as long as u have worked under them. he says working under them >>> just some prof u have taken course under and performed well
idk anyways.. lets see
Good luck
btw arxiv preprints wont help right?
In my experience They will
Yes they will
hmm ok
If you have preprints list them
cuz likely by the time they even look at my application.. id have researched more
should i list em.. or just link my arxiv user?
List them
(also similar question about github.. showcase projects and add a link to it?)
hmm ok
So have a section on your cv that says like preprints and publication and list them in chronological order.
i thought adding the user would be better since some stuff im doing is work in progress but will be done by december ez
hmm ok. ig ill add the one prepreint and one pub
not much.. but it is what it is ig
perhaps it may help that the preprint is a sota model
so i shouldnt add my arxiv user link anywhere?
hmm
shiz strezzvul man
doesnt help i have to complete a book chapter in like 5 days..
do book chapters help? 
Yes
so do i add unpublished book chapter to arxiv?
as a preprint?
(cuz it wont get published by deadline)
(man.. if only i didnt work with my prof on the stupid research paper.. i could have gotten paper accepted to a top conference by application deadline)
the deadline really hurts since many conferences review at an absolute snails pace 💀
and most conferences are once or twice a year..
i mean.. without proof.. cant u just say anything?
Yes and people trust that you aren't lying
hmm
what if someone just said a bunch of bs and made themselves seem like they had discovered cancers cure (hyperbole)?
wouldnt many who get in basically lie at that point?
thnx a lot for all the advice btw 👍
yeah ill have to do it by nov 11 anyways 💀
CVPR deadlines..
im kinda worried cuz i promised book chapter to my prof by tomorrow..
ill probably need to ask him for after november 11.. i really need to finish my own paper..
perhaps ill work on both simultaneously
fuck dude..
what motivates you to apply, what you expect from the REU, any particular profs/courses you want to take there, any interesting personal experiences with math
to name a few things
Ok so I should tailor these to specific programs?
what do you see yourself doing in the future (research presumably)
yes
got it
if you're applying to a bunch of REUs you can like make a generic one and then tailor it a bit to each one
see each REU's requirements, but yeah a page or less is a good rule of thumb
sounds good
does it matter if I do it in latex or google docs (as long as a PDF comes out)?
I imagine no
usually only the file format, length and maybe basic formatting is specified
should be good so long as it's readable
dope
tysm
should I go into detail about current research I have?
like what I've worked on, what I'm currently working on?
maybe not a ton of detail but do mention some things if you feel it's relevant
Is it a big issue(i.e. look undesirable on the resume) to postpone a year of graduation? I'm in a Math & CS department and I postponed doing two of my CS courses(operating systems and computer org). I'm a 3rd year student now, and there's a chance that I will have to take an extra year to graduate because of this. More importantly, I postponed those courses because I wanted to focus on math more, but now I feel like it was all bootless even though I will finish all my math core courses earlier...sorry if this sounds dumb, I'm just feeling a bit bitter about this situation. Also, I'm in a branch campus of the Israel Technion, where we don't need to write a thesis paper or anything before graduate, and I dunno if it's because of this most students do a masters degree before considering PhDs. Would there be anything I could do to use my time more efficiently here(and possibly boost up my chances of going directly to applying to a PhD), if in the worst case I have to postpone a year?
I feel really stressed out
a whole thing happened
My prof told me to work on his project to get the paper shipped out by September 1.
Due to this, I could not complete my own paper which I was going to submit to a reputed conference and would likely get accepted in AAAI
I felt okay with it as at least i was getting one paper published, but now the prof is saying that we cant publish as the registration costs are too high
I feel really stressed because i wont have a single publication by the end of the application period. most of my publications will happen after that now..
what should I do?
What can you do? Just link the preprints on your cv
try and get it published by december regardless is the plan for now..
kinda dumb tho..
really stressed about how it negatively effects my admission chances a lot
should i try and publish/get as much as i can get accepted before december in ok conferences? or should I try and get my stuff accepted at good conferences even if it takes longer and just have it mentioned on my SoP/LoR? @tacit lark
I could apply for spring intake and by that point I would have more pubs too.. is that a good idea? I have heard spring intake is much more difficult to get in
yeah
thnx tho still
CS moves too fast
some times papers dont even get published and remain at arxiv cuz conferences and publications are too slow
Should I have anything in my CV like skill-wise for grad apps?
What sorts of skills do you have in mind
I have this section that I'm just thinking of removing
I don't think I had any
I'm not sure it really serves a purpose anymore
Yeah
Probably more useful applying to real jobs
Yes
which hopefully I won't have to do for the next several years
🤞
Is Trello a skill
I don't know 
And what does "Linux" mean
I can do stuff in linux idk
I think I was told to put this crap in by someone several years ago when I was applying to internships
You should have this sort of stuff for internships
I think you’re over thinking it. If you want to then Submit it to a different conference that your advisor is willing to pay for. Or you can wait and say it youre waiting for a certain conference. Preprints look fine. If the paper is on arxiv they will be able to look at it.
Guys, is Oxford worth it ?
Like is a how “worse” is a 195th best university compared to Oxford ?
115th in maths
It’s the UCLouvain (Université Catholique de Louvain)
worth it for what?
for masters probably a reasonable difference, but if it costs a lot I wouldn't
though for masters I'd consider Cambridge unless your specialism is done at Oxford (eg. analytic NT you'd want to go to oxford for Ben Green and James Maynard probably)
that sounds unnecessarily rude to Oxford but I think if you're shooting for the very top you should apply to Cambridge as well (unless Oxford is better for your situation/specialism/they give you a scholarship/ etc.). I'd imagine the quality of instruction is pretty much identical but the students might be a bit stronger at cam
How good are rec letters from Dickson instructors (Junior faculty) compared to those from big profs ? I feel like It's not easy to interact with the big profs since they're always busy with grad/postdoc students.
Can I ask profs at places I'm applying to where else I should apply
Problem is there's not really any at my uni lol atm it's mostly profs in adjacent fields im trying to ask
The one in the area is on leave this semester
You can still ask someone on leave
i have but he hasn't replied yet
gonna try emailing a few adjacent
I was thinking about that but isn't it wired if didn't work with their supervisor ?
well isn't a "did well in class" letter not as good as a "did good research" letter regardless of who writes it
oh
yea
one prof I spoke to seemed to think I should go elsewhere (or at least have his uni as a lower choice) and gave me some pointers but I think my latest email to them got buried
he seemed surprised I'd consider them a high choice which does give me a bit of pause lol
You shouldn’t really be asking for a “did well-in class” letter period tbh
It doesn’t say much
If you also went to office hours a lot and talked about other stuff and they have some way to say more about you as a student it can be fine, but profs have told me sometimes ppl who just took a class and got a good grade ask for a letter and they’re like uhhhh


