Welcome, this channel is for users to discuss the process of graduate school applications, whether PhD or Masters, as well as related applications like postgrad, fellowships, and grants. Please do not discuss applications to undergraduate programs here. "Chancing" conversations and other potentially toxic modes of discussion are not allowed in this channel. Please be respectful and uplifting of your peers, this channel is a space for people to work together and provide helpful information and input to each other.
#graduate-applications
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
First
👀
gonna be applying for phds [looking at functional analysis specifically] in NA (mainly US maybe one or two Canada) & UK
Good luck
I might apply to US + elsewhere PhDs by next year
so same
I'm in the US and I'm still ignorant about US universities 
So don't worry, we've all got silly questions.
actually how's the situation for international students, what kinda stuff should I look out for, what's to be expected
like obvs I'd need TOEFL and there's a bunch of stuff about student visas I guess?
but how does this affect stipends etc if at all
Are intls taxed more or less?
That's reassuring
Why does it feel like universities make it impossible to find out how much they're actually paying grad students
I have not been able to find a straight answer on how much a stipend is for several unis
one university I looked at emphasised that living in that city was really cheap on the funding page
not sus at all
i cant remember if it gave a figure
A stipend can look really bad if not compared against the cost of living of the city the university is in
but I can't find figures at all for some unis
which is really frustrating
worse for them if students start comparing stipends as a shortlisting factor ig
Yeah that's exactly why lol
Same reason talking about salaries is discouraged by some companies
Do you usually know what your stipend will be after you get accepted? Like at what point will I know, if I want to start looking for apartments
Alright cool
what does that mean
I haven't been considering funding that much cos of the top ups you can get
I think I'll just see what I get if I get anything (hopefully I do otherwise it's industry for me lol), good deals would defo be tiebreakers
At least if I do a PhD before being pushed into industry I have 4-5 years to build more applicable skills than I have atm
@sterile bone which places are you trying to find stipends for?
when I wrote that I think I was looking at ucsd, northeastern and uiowa but in general it seems hard to find stipends
there's the phdstipends website but it seems inconsistent
https://math.uiowa.edu/graduate-program/admissions/financial-support is for 2021-2022, but this https://grad.uiowa.edu/sites/grad.uiowa.edu/files/2021-05/03-17-21 COGS 2021-23 CBA (pdf).pdf suggests that UIowa basically pays the min (some places, certain departments pay more than the min stipend). So expect next year to be about 20,500-20,600?
The "academic year" rate is assuming full time I think
So likely you'll be paid half of that at a 50% appointment
Which feels a bit low tbh. Maybe ask Max
Northeastern I am having more trouble finding
The only school that I've seen that releases all stipend info (minus design and arch) in a readable format is CMU
Description of stipend amounts and fee coverage by department.
Given that in an SOP, it is (at least from what I've heard) a good idea to mention the research of a professor you're interested in working with, is it a bad idea to mention that you are interested in working in a specific area that is adjacent to their research if you only have topical understandings of both fields?
On one hand, I feel like this shows initiative by identifying a subfield you're interested in working with and trying to tie that into the existing framework that is the professor's current research. On the other hand, I fear that the lack of deeper-than-surface-level understanding of the fields will be very quickly noticed by the people reading the essay.
[For context, the reason I am wanting to declare this specific interest is because I don't want to just be like "uhh your program focuses on things that I'm probably interested in."]
I think it's fine, but just don't elaborate on it a ton
@vale oar
you should say what you are authentically interested in learning and that will come through if you are honest about what you know and don't try to claim things you don't know
say why you're interested in that subfield, based on things you do know. don't try to look like you know stuff in it.
when i was applying, i would say stuff like "i think this topic sounds really cool because i know it shares machinery with x thing i studied before, and the results look like those in y thing i studied before, and i'd be excited to combine those ideas"
something maybe a little more cohesive than that but you get the idea
Another thing I've got mixed opinions on: yay or nay to contacting profs you plan to put on your SoP to express interest and ask if they're planning on taking on students?
sure, you need to know whether they can actually take you as a student and if you don't, it can get weird if they're asked during the admissions process or something
I'm mainly worried that I can't actually say anything substantive lol, like for UK apps I can ask to discuss possible topics but for the US that's a bit preemptive
I didn't contact anyone but I know some people who were happy they did
You can just say "hey, I'm applying to this program, my research interests are this and this and i'm interested in your work. are you planning on taking students soon?"
doesn't have to be substantive
you can say one or two things about background but keep it concise
There isn't a researcher alive who doesn't want to talk to an interested person about their work!
Show interest and they will be very glad to put time aside
I've been doing this
Good responses so far
Found out one person is planning on retiring soon too
I just said smth like "Hi, i'm X and I'm finishing up my undergrad at Y, I was wondering if you're taking phd students next year because i'm interested in applying to university name and working with you as i'm interested in [their field, generally]"
Alright I'll start sending them off
You don't have to be. Anyone who doesn't want to talk about applications is definitely welcome to mute and ignore the channel.
I just put "prospective graduate student inquiry"
Something like that is fine I think
Aren't we all
how does this look as a template?
then will tweak the research interests to fit the prof
Looks fairly good. Maybe also suggest that you meet to discuss more, but this is up to you
I found I got a lot out of zoom meeting with potential supos
i've debated including that line, the problem comes down to social anxiety lol
like if I agree to a call and all they say is "so what did you want to talk about" and expected me to have more knowledge of their research than I do or something
idk
I know how you feel, I'm also quite socially anxious and video calls exhaust me
In my experience while it is useful to have a few questions ready, the people I talked to haven't expected me to be terribly knowledgeable about their research
I'd say it's worth the trouble
Aaaaa I'll go for it lol
I just don't want to seem like a complete plonker then they just chuck my app in the bin when they get it
Hmmm
I would probably not suggest to meet before admissions happen
If they want to that's totally fine (and if you do ask, it's not a faux pas or anything, don't worry about that)
Maybe it's okay
First impressions are a big deal as usual, and you're basically saying "I want their first impression of me to be a sorta messy zoom call instead of my carefully curated application" which is totally fine if you are confident that you can talk with someone like that (social anxiety doesn't mean you can't be a good fit for this - it's about how talkative you can be when you actually get into the space and settled a tiny bit) but I think a lot of people would prefer not to have that be the first impression they give
yeah can't disagree with this, will keep it out
first email sent :ooooooo
this is what I sent, should I reword it in future?
Well, the last sentence makes it pretty clear that they're looking for students I guess!
A little dismissive, but perhaps they're just busy.
sometimes you can't give much more than the generic response though
you don't know the person, maybe nothing in the details you've given about your interests resonates w them etc
better than nothing probably
I didn't give out much more info than George and got back really enthusiastic responses from a few professors
Not from everyone tho of course
I'd say keep trying
did you end up emailing two professors from the same school?
at all?
I wonder if that requires any special care
Yea I did. I tried phrasing my email so that it won't come off like I specifically emailed them
Like, that I will.definitely work with them if I go to the school
Actually one of the profs told me they're very open about like, students having multiple advisors and talking a lot with people in the department
Just dont be like "you are the person im working with if i come here one hundo percent!!"
Otherwise it's fine
what happens if I send this verbatim tho
They put you in the crank folder
I think my conclusion after talking to some people is that I'll go for semiformal and if that offends someone I probably won't want to work with them anyways.
Hello Professor [Prof name],
My name is [My name], and I'm a senior mathematics major at [my college]. I was planning on applying to the [prof college] mathematics graduate program for Fall 2023. My interests are mainly applications of model theory to combinatorics and algebra. Your research in [prof's research] is particularly interesting to me, and so I was wondering if you were planning on taking on graduate students for the next year.
Best,
[My name]
looks fine
I pretty much gave their exact research interests but I don't know anything in particular
got a better response with that email from someone else, they said "So I encourage you to apply to <university>. Please let me know if you do it." :oo
The purpose of the Doctoral Comprehensive Examination (known in the department as ``Comps'') ...
Well now I have a conundrum. Do I refer to the exams as "Comps" in my SOP to sound hip and in-the-know, or will it make me look silly
I will likely reference them when mentioning that the classes I've so far taken set me up well for taking most of the Comps upon entry.
Won't that be clear from your transcript anyway
how many schools are people thinking of applying to?
it looks like I'll be applying to ~13-15 when including my UK apps and I'm wondering if that's too much. doesn't seem above average when I look on like mathgre but in a lot of non-subject-specific talk people talk about applying to about half as many
10-15 is a standard number
yeah I don't really have specific research interests rn
there's as vague as "functional analysis/harmonic analysis" so there's quite a wide range I can apply to, I've ended up with 8 US choices
I think I definitely need to do this for the more famous profs
You don't need to get too crazy with that stuff. Dont say stuff where you risk looking like you're posturing too much / risk not knowing what you're talking about, cause it will throw stuff you do know about into question
Yeah I'm stuck between not appearing too ignorant and humiliating myself, I'm just thinking for more famous profs (I don't think any of them are super famous), I can't be too generic
2 years??
i'm 2/3 on replies rn but I only sent the third a day or two ago, I have about 10-11 more queued
can postdocs supervise?
also the thing I'm worried about talking to profs atm is it feels a little bit pre-emptive, I'll definitely get in touch in more detail if I get accepted so I know what kind of summer reading I can do
i've only really known what I wanted to do research wise for 2 or 3 months
though applying in the US for phds has been in my mind since high school
wdym?
yeah I'll have 2
one for bachelors and one for masters (only 4 yrs overall cos bscs are 3 yrs in uk)
i'm lucky in that I would be able to go home and stay with parents if I didn't get summer support I think
yee it's something I'll sort out once I've got acceptances I think
do universities generally pay for travel to/from?
lots
there are at least 10 that I know of here + probably a lot more that I don't
i have savings to pay any small shortfalls
i did think about NSW
but i think sydney cost of living is high?
this doesn't sound too much different from my impressions of the US? (in terms of pay/cost of living)
I think tossing up cost of living stuff will come after I have offers, and if I have none then lol
This is not true at many schools
Most programs do one of two things
They either provide funding for 12 months of the year, or they provide it for 9 months of the year and then grad students will teach a summer class or get funding from their advisor for the summer
My school is the latter (NYU) and I didnt get any funding at all during the summer this time around. Next summer i'll be with an advisor and I'll likely start getting it
But I really didnt need any summer funding
I saved plenty during the year and had no issue during the summer
I would say that pretty much anywhere you are except for at like, ucla, a phd stipend is going to be very livable on your own. Luxurious? No.
i am very frugal generally
I can splash on computers and accessories but not much else
some departments will fund/partially fund equipment for you
I would only fly home for Xmas but idk if I'd be able to financially
hopefully I'd have people I can spend the day with if not
Flights to and from the uk are very cheap at least from the east coast, if you buy them at the right times

cheap like?
Thats from new York
And also like
At the best times for booking
Otherwise I would say 700 is more reasonable
Lol
Yeah
From Pittsburgh, it's $700 for the month of December right now, and Pittsburgh is further west, so $500-700 is like a pretty good estimate
i would probably book the flights right after accepting the offer
yeah I feel then it'd cost a few $100 to then get to wherever I need to be and cancel the saving lol
yeah that too
yeah I'd apply as soon as I knew where I was going so hopefully there wouldn't be a problem
there's people getting visas in the past month to my masters uni because their offers were confirmed late which seems bonkers given term starts at the beginning of october lol
successfully edited my grad school list to only have schools where GRE is optional 
lol same, I think all of mine except one won't even take scores
yeah, just had to replace UCI
if I have a question about the applications process to a specific school should I ask the grad advisor that I'm interested in working with or the department itself?
part of the problem is I'm unsure if I should even apply to the math program there
I might have to apply to the philosophy program 
i actually only found 2 that i wanted to apply to that I couldn't cos of GRE (ucla and A&M)
glad I didn't have to do it
hmmm if you're legitimately unable to take the GRE most schools afaik are pretty understanding of that
and will waive it for you
i'm not, I could fly out to take it
but the cost wouldn't make sense to apply to 1 or 2
I think I have enough options anyway
I think having to fly out to take it counts as legitimately unable 
I was expecting to have to since there's like 1 centre in the UK with super limited places
and i didn't realise how early I needed to be
but I didn't need it anyway
loool schools requiring gre are gonna get totally fucked over
like
imagine how many excellent applicants are not going to apply to these schools
Glad you think I'm an excellent applicant 
Ngl it must save a lot of time reading applications
Since I'd imagine the top schools just toss apps with a GRE score below a minimum?
Similarly, math departments could just decide to admit the best of the first 50 applicants on a randomized list if they like. Requiring the GRE does not mean you weed out worse applicants, it means you weed out likely a large proportion of the best ones. The school would be silly to want that.
i had just heard it's something that some do
A&M blanked me
I could try another contact email
i doubt UCLA would since they want both
@tepid forum try emailing sarah Witherspoon
sure why not
might apply there instead of OSU if I get a positive answer since they have loads of ppl in analysis
she said she's not sure and told me to email Maurice Rojas fwiw
she replied extremely quickly lol
dm'd but it's a generic email lol
I'll post what they say on here
my (hopefully) essay supervisor next year has coauthors at A&M so hopefully that'll work in my favour
woah new channel, nice
Ummm I just applied without a GRE?
why am I allowed to see this now
visibility of this channel is tied to the advanced role.
It's now visible to everyone.
Posting is restricted like the other advanced channels.
Opening the floodgates lol
flood
more like a springdis prolly dying in a month
I wonder how much the GRE correlates with mathematical ability
My guess would be approximately epsilon
Like it's gotta have some positive correlation but that correlation has also gotta be so minor
Like at the point where it's not humanly possible to give it consideration without giving it too much consideration
Based on what I heard of the practice of using gre in most schools, passing some sort of low threshold on gre correlates with mathematical ability, but past that it doesnt which is why they only use the former as a "metric"
i think a very very high or very very low result could be indicative
but I doubt in the middle it indicates a huge amount
doubt that
going to be very lively jan-march
why jan-march lol?
grad apps are due at latest by january in general, right?
decisions around that time?
i think some come through dec and april (if you're wlisted for the latter) but I thought most of them are jan-mar
the MathGRE [the forum] sweat threads seem to be more active around decisions than pre
we'll see 👀
huh interesting
I would prefer to minimize decisions talk here because that brings unnecessary stress for everyone involved
oh rip
Decisions talk can be very bleak. decisions come in waves, and it’s usually pretty stressful if people got decisions from one place and others haven’t heard anything from that place yet, which doesn’t necessarily mean anything negative
that threshold seems like it would have to be pretty low
like the gre does require some amount of mathematical ability/knowledge but it's main source of difficulty comes from having 2.5 minutes per question
damn you're saying we shouldn't be mathematicsgre.com 2?
mathematicsgre.com is one of the two websites that is considered banned here
the other one is left as an exercise to the reader
||chegg?||
7\
probably just because it's an awful site in general
it's like exactly what this channel isn't intended to be
I don't want you to be responsible for people developing long term blood pressure problems @broken shore
let me guess is it that forum where everyones has perfect stats
I have the age old question of how much would my grades obstruct me (< 3 gpa) if I score good in GRE maths
I'm speaking out of my ass, but I would imagine that gpa is drastically more important than gre general or subject
Or rather I should say a worse gpa score outweighs a good gre score
With rampant grade inflation I'm not sure how much a "good" gpa matters, but a "bad" gpa will draw attention
Man, I wish I had inflated gpa. The grading system at my uni was horrible. It's like too strict but it varied greatly depending on the teacher
We had only 6 students so, almost every professor would say no grade curving. You get what you get.
Plus, no provision for grade improvement, you'll need to completely redo the course. Redoing 2-3 courses if they are pre-requisite for anything
Meant that you have a set back for a whole goddamn year!
Only 6 students at your uni 
As in, in my batch. Although, even altogether it would be less than 50
It wasn't like a big university. It's more of a college; we had only the 4 basic science departments
they might use the GRE subj to contextualise your gpa
but i've seen profiles of people with lower 3.xs still do quite well
Yea cuz the material needed to ace the gre is 99% stuff.you.learn in your first year
It sounds like it is designed to be more predictive for fields other than mathematics itself that apply a lot of those topics as background tools.
Thing is it sometimes involves "special topics" which can be pretty much anything
And I don't think any other degree requires it
yeah doesn't the math GRE have a ton of things you don't need in applied fields
@ numbpy, I'd say that this as well as your recommendation letters matter at least as much as GPA if not more
take that with a grain of salt though since I'm not in the US
so I don't have any concrete evidence for it, I'm just extrapolating from my perception of local academic culture
not sure if a ton, the stuff on there seemed fairly fundamental
yeah I gathered recommendation letters dwarf anything else
but a very very low mGRE might still look bad
is the mGRE really necessary anyway? I feel like taking it would be really hard for international students
that's actually one of my main worries since I'm considering applying to US grad schools sometime by next year
unless there's a way to take it at home? which seems to be the case
Most schools are willing to waive it if it's not feasible for you to take it.
i'm praying A&M will lol
still waiting for reply
In most places general gre is completely waived while gre maths is optional. I am just giving it cause I want it to make up for my low grades if that happens
I see
This might be partly bcs of COVID though
I think like Harvard and UCLA have made it compulsory
true, but it's been long since the lockdowns and travel restrictions so time will tell if unis will make it mandatory again or just decide the mGRE is overrated as a measure of aptitude for grad studies
schools like cmu get a fuuuuckton of applicants, and not only don't allow you to submit any GRE scores, but they have zero application fee (which application fees are also cited as a weedout bc they get so many applicants)
if they can do it, so can Harvard and ucla
Just to verify, if someone signs off an email with their first name is it acceptable to refer to them as such moving forwards?
do u need to be a math major to do grad school
Usually, yes. If you have taken adequate courseload for the undergrad math curriculum, you might be okay. This is essentially at least knowledge of real analysis, algebra, topology, etc.
a masters' first might be a good option for non-math majors
i dont do this
i only refer to one of my professors by their first name, and that's because he explicitly gave permission
isnt that the whole tihing with ur weirdo college
Yeah sorry I refer to certain profs by name too, but I would not allow myself to do that just because they started signing their emails as such
It also has things you don't need in pure fields
how big of a deal would it be if there was a pronoun mismatch in my rec letters. Like if two professors used they/them for me but the last used he/him. There's one professor who I'm slightly nervous about coming out to even though I'm like 99% sure they'll take it well just in the off chance they don't
"pronoun mismatch somehow impacts my chances of getting in" and "coming out to the professor somehow leads to a worse letter" both seem like very unlikely possibilities, but I'm wondering if one is still a tiny bit less likely or if I'm just overthinking the whole thing
There isn’t going to be an issue with it I don’t think
(lmfao accidentally said "for him" instead of "for me" so it looked like I was being extremely transphobic to myself)

I know some of my letter writers didn’t end up using my preferred pronouns, and I wasn’t really asked about it or anything
The most that ended up happening is that my gender wasn’t on my university profile bc I declined to state it on my application
based
how did you find this out?
did they tell you or were you able to look at your letters at some point?
It wasn’t in malice, it was more along the lines of not being out to many people in undergrad
Oh I see
It’s funny bc it’s a required field I never updated on my profile, so I don’t think cmu admin knows my gender still.. I should check on it
But regardless, I think you’re okay @rapid dawn
what would you give as the trigger to being able to switch then?
yeah generally I only switch to calling professors by their first name until (a) I know them well and am confident I am on very good terms with them and (b) I see that they're signing their emails to me as such. Both conditions are required.
Like I still call the professor I know the best Prof. Lastname since that's how he signs his emails.
Despite having worked with him more than any other professor in the department (including others who I do call by their first name), and knowing I am on very good terms with him.
also even the professors who I do generally call by their first name I'll still often call Prof. Lastname in emails, particularly when asking about things like rec letters, etc
if i’m getting informal with it ill just call them “professor”
CMU math is pretty weird ngl. They don't have any usual maths fields like analysis, algebra. Mostly discrete and some applied math. I don't think many people apply there. CMU's CS is most famous and the department of philosophy
I am not sure what’s considered a lot of applicants in a year, but there were well over 500 this past cycle at cmu
So that might be the result of the free application
no algebra but quite a bit of analysis
theyve got basically everything except algebra, really
I mean, since it has zero application fees I would also apply but these are the only areas in which they work on. 2 of them are applied and rest is discrete maths or logic
saying 2 of these are applied is a very very conservative definition of applied
they've still got basically everything except algebra
There's literally no number theory
Oh I’m not saying that cmu doesn’t have a broad scope of math, they definitely don’t have a very large program
Agreed
cmu only has one number theorist, and she’s a teaching postdoc
that's algebra, for sufficiently broad definitions of algebra :^)
So you can’t exactly say they have one
I wouldn’t apply to cmu unless you are in analysis/logic and have some idea of where you want to be in those fields
i just realized i came off slightly smug in that message. i meant to come across jokingly, sorry
wtf does that even mean lmao. That's like completely ignoring analytic number theory. RH is a part of analytic NT
it was supposed to be very lighthearted
No worries, it was just a weird opinion
it's not mine

cmu's department has always been a huge outlier
it weirdly never places as high as it actually is in rankings, and people forget about it a lot
But in general, if anyone here is interested in CMU’s grad program and has any questions, feel free to dm me or ping me here
how do i get in
Are you from cmu?
Niice, ug?
phd
under which proff
Likely Slepçev or Fonseca, but it’s too early for me to have an advisor
i mirror whatever they call themselves
in the opening I call them professor x then if they reply with their first name I'll just do that
also since this is popping off a bit, does anyone have opinions on where's good for functional analysis/non-PDE harmonic analysis?
waterloo was one I overlooked for a while that looks good
How does one even decide on research interests (just to help narrow down my list of schools and look for professors etc) when I can barely understand most of the papers being churned out by the departments
I think schools really only expect you to have a general domain you'd like to study, i.e. analysis, algebra, topology, etc.
You definitely do not need to understand papers from the profs, understand the vague description of their research interests will be enough for now
If you're worried about not knowing what you're interested in, you should apply to a couple schools with large departments that study most things
that helps a lot. A lot of my initial grad school advice was from my sister who was not in a stem field so I guess the expectations are just different lol. Thanks!
even most profs barely understand the abstracts of papers in their own field, that's how it is with math
it definitely helps if you can narrow down your interests to something even slightly specific like "algebraic geometry" or "PDEs" or whatever
but don't fuss too much over it if you don't understand exactly what their research group does
I think it's better to find a social group/advisor that you get along with and go along with that
Rather than pre-defining "I'm this!!" before getting too into research
I'm worried a prof is deliberately spreading rumors about me to sabotage my career, should I report it even tho I can't get evidence? (she's keeping the rumors to word-of-mouth, obviously)
she likely has no malicious intent: she's just very narrow-minded and prescriptivist, thinking that ppl like me shouldn't do math
no, do not report
but it's bullying
just move on?
I do have email evidence of a previous attempt to gaslight tho
there is no context, is this your phd advisor?
no
so why does it matter?
good luck with that
(no it will not affect them at all if you report some hearsay and badly worded email)
but if she won't let me into her puny undergrad thesis program, I'll just use that time to publish a big-boy math paper (about stuff I'm self-studying outside of class), proving that she's the delusional one
I guess I'll report her then
I think you need to work on your interpersonal skills. If you want to destroy any chances at your current institution, go ahead.
I'll already be out of the institution by then; I still get a bachelor's degree even without the thesis
no, she needs to stop being garbage (she actually publically defended a nsfw-offender prof once; that prof got fired anyway, so I'm not the only one)
this is not an appropriate thing to discuss here really, id suggest keeping it out of the channel.
Do admissions committees view projects done in outside fields (say physics/applied math) as a plus ?
Like if you're applying for a pure math phD that has no/minimal relation to the fields.
Don't know about other places, but when I have been a part admission it is a plus (if it is a proper journal, and not like mdpi etc)
I see, so if it's not worth publishing like most MS thesis stuff, it doesn't really affect the odds does it?
MS thesis stuff as in reproducing computational results from papers, varying parameters slightly etc
To me (my personal opinion) is that a low-level journal paper means nothing, but a good journal paper then it can be a big plus depending on what it is. But I have no idea how admissions works in the US for example, so somebody else would know better 🙂
(I am an assistant prof in Sweden)
I was actually talking to my prof about this just the other day and he said it pretty much doesn't count in the slightest
Is it ok to write about non-mathematical things in a statement of purpose?
in particular
i'm involved in math student government, the math faculty council, I run two of the math clubs, I was a math orientation leader and i won leader of the year, I've participated in our math peer mentorship program and I've organized/run review sessions for like... 4 of our first/second year math courses
none of this is strictly about my math research
but all of it feels relevant; I'm heavily involved in mentorship and creating a community for math students
Yeah thats all great to mention, if there's a diversity/outreach statement I'd allocate it there
But if not, then if you can fit it in the statement of purpose and make an argument for why its a selling point it cant hurt
But if you're fighting for space, don't sacrifice stuff of mathematical substance for this. Either way, keep it concise.
Especially if you can point to why this prepares you to teach/mentor
I don't know what I want to put in terms of mathematical content 😔 that part feels extremely hard to me
Man, I haven't done shit in my uni. This makes me feel like I am not even in the competition 
No senior thesis, I did a research term, I’ve done a few topics/grad courses but no readings courses, I’m interested in a wild amount of areas of math so idk what to write about
I’m a very social outgoing person and my strengths are much more interpersonal than mathematical — I’ve made an incredibly strong effort to get involved in math at my school, and since our math faculty is so big we have lots of opportunities
I guess so, we did have like maths club but that's all. We didn't even have faculties for few fields and between that an doing 6 courses per semester was a weird place to be at. Plus, I was very interested in ML so I didn't study like very hard for maths. So, now I have neither properly done ML nor maths 
this is a feeling I get on the regular in this server
For my research it’s kind of clear to me what I can write about - at least I think so, I can talk about what I did and what was interesting about it - but idk what to say about a course
Definitely
how should I reply to a professor replying to me reaching out about being a graduate advisor
like obviously I should thank them, but is there anything else I should do, it feels like a thanks is insufficient for a full email
well, did they say they would be interesting in working with you?
and are you committed yet to that?
(committed being used loosely, I mean committed to giving it a shot)
they were kinda vague
youre a first year right?
I'm a senior UG
yeah, makes sense. advisors often dont want to commit to working with students pre-quals
I am glad to hear of your interest in logic and Notre Dame. In principle I am taking graduate students. My main appointment is in philosophy, but I am also affiliated with mathematics and can have graduate students in mathematics.
oh that's a little strange
this was the relevant part of his reply to me I guess
your potential advisor is mostly interested in philosophy?
ehhh
kinda
it's Hamkins, so he studies mostly math stuff but it's got more philosophy vibes in terms of like what he explores
he's definitely a mathematician but he might be trying to shift into philosophy more
Yeah, maybe its worth looking into that more. If he's the reason you want to go to that school that would be important to know
yeah, so the other part of the email was me asking about the logic program at Notre Dame, which he says you transfer into from either the philosophy or math departments
so I'd probably do that regardless
huh. Well, to answer your original question, you pretty much just thank him now. Restate your interest and enthusiasm for the program, etc. The usual
Don't over do it though, obviously
Idk if there is anyone who has ever had these email conversations and not felt awkward
Thank you for taking the time to reply and answer my questions! I am excited to be applying to Notre Dame this application cycle.
yeah this was my reply thus far
idk when I send emails I'm always of the mind that unless it's super-casual they need to have meat
but on the other hand I hate writing fluff
and so together these urges make me short circuit 
the two that I've got in touch with so far have told me to tell them when I send the application
so I wsn't gonna reply till then
To me it sounds like he's saying "the philosophy department pays my salary, but don't let that fool you: I'm a real mathematician too".
yeah i dont think it'd be an unusual arrangement
oh I didn't think about that reading; that's probably more hopeful
... while at the same time also hinting, "you'd need to be able to enjoy or at least tolerate occasional musings about what it all means; otherwise I'm probably not the best choice of advisor".
wtf
since when was hamkins at notre dame
we're talking joel hamkins yes?
i had no clue
this is huge
if i end up doing inner model theory, it won't be a good choice, but if not then i might apply
oh it's the mathoverflow guy
It's the multiverse guy.
jdh is really cool
good choice tox
sounds similar to how the CMU PAL stuff works
has anyone had a look at Berkeley's "personal history statement" thing (I think other UCs have it too)
wondering what kind of stuff ppl are gonna write (also having a google around)
Oh I know this is late but Hamkins does the geology stuff too, which is related so it's not bad in that case either, right?
yaya he does set theory ik

this seems like a meaningless thing lmfao
if i want to go in this direction it'd be a good fit
i'm writing about how I came to do a bachelors in math then have a paragraph in the end "I recognise that [demonstrate awareness of social justice issues]"
i don't think anything huge worth writing about happened in my bachelors since I always felt I'd do a phd if I did well enough
with the [...] basically being that not everyone has an environment conducive to self-study and some people are actively discouraged (my parents basically just left me to do whatever in my free time)
Hmm, that sounds like you're essentially apologizing for yourself. UCB has a bit of a reputation for being over-the-top left skewed (depending on who you ask, of course), but do they really expect applicants to engage in an objective comparative analysis of how much they deserve to be admitted compared to other hypothetical applicants? In a reasonable world it ought to be enough to explain why you think you would be a successful PhD candidate, and leave it to the readers to make whichever allowances for the hardship of others they consider appropriate.
I will print screen the wording of it
i have nothing to say about the last 3 bullets though lol
Wow. Yeah, that pretty much obliterates my point ...
i feel like it's a bit of a political litmus test though yes
Agreed.
the two examples I came across didn't address the second bullet at all though so idk what that's about
or any of them but the first really
this is probably like these things for TT positions. just make it standard and bland. you will not get a position because this part of the application is great, but you certainly can lose a position if it is bad (extreme in either way)
all u have to tell them is ur not a shitty person
i genuinely think that's literally it
in either way?
my intention is to just show awareness of the lingo and basic issues really
extreme SJW or fascist 😛
i can't see how the former would damage your application unless it was just clear you were taking the piss
but idrk
I've never made any job applications just university apps
I don't intend on worrying much about it, I've written about a page and I think I'll call it
How do I look for REUs?
I'm interested in Algorithms, Algebra, Discrete Math, and Cryptography (probably in that order)
I have no idea how to tell which ones are good other than "ah Harvard is a good school I'm sure their REU is good"
I know certain schools are more popular in some fields than others (iirc UChicago is big in analysis?????) but I have no idea how to tell which programs do what
I am a junior right now, I 100% want to get my PhD in either algorithms or something algebraic (or some combination if such a thing exists) and I've heard that if you can do an REU at a top uni and do well, that's really beneficial to grad school apps
there arent that many out for S23
There are a few resources that sort reus by subject.As far as quality there are a few "perstigious" reus. But apply to anything that looks intresting. Once you write one app its easy to write more. and cost nothing. THEN ONCE you get in somewhere worry about which ones are the good ones.
also there is an nsa reu and this is the only one that isnt actually due in early 2023 as far as im aware, and is instead due in a few months, so if that ones intresting prepare to apply. They do the stuff you listed to my understanding
NSA* not NSF sorry LOL
there seems to be a loose inverse relation between well-known REUs and well-known unis
probably bc less well known unis are more willing to go out of there way to attract people with special programs
ALso its things like great mentors that really drive these programs success
Hey guys
Don’t know if this is appropriate
But I’m trying to apply for Spirit of Ramanujan
and I want to improve my application for the grant
Home Resources Biography Apply Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Email Develop your talent.Realize your potential.Achieve your goals. Develop your talent.Realize your potential.Achieve your goals. Do you have the spirit? In order to honor the legacy of Srinivasa Ramanujan, the Spirit of Ramanujan STEM Talent Initiative supports emerging enginee...
What I would say about the 2nd bullet point, is surely you or someone around you has faced some difficulties personally (e.g. due to race, gender, sexual orientation, autism, adhd, anxiety etc). Talk about this.
for personal experience I said a bit about apathy and anti-intellectualism but I did talk about those things too
i think i could embellish the stuff I said about myself more but idk
I have too much of a conscience about misrepresenting these things
Maybe highlight difficulties that you have observed that have faced your peers a bit
For example representation of women in mathematics
yeah I wrote a bit about that, maybe I should flesh it out
I tried to cover a bit of everything, maybe I should focus on just one or two things
Either way, you have quite a while left to work on this
Almost 3 months
And also, you don't necessarily have to flesh it out that much
Personally, I didn't even mention anything about the last 2 bullet points if I remember correctly
Because as someone going into model theory, the 4th bullet point is really not relevant
And if you don't think you'll be a leader in these groups, or haven't been, then it's fine
For the 3rd bullet point, you can only really write stuff about it if you've done active outreach stuff. Which if you have, write about it. If you haven't, but want to include it, you've still got a couple of months to do it and add it.
And I think everyone can talk about the first 2 bullet points
Also out of interest, how long is your statement of purpose / personal statement?
I am going for 1000 words for statement of purpose
My personal history is going to be about 700-750
what do you want to improve specifically
I want to improve my capability for research
... for the application?
I mean in the CV you just give a more or less objective outline of what you've done and in the personal statement you should put your motivations, and there perhaps mention any research you've done
Just generally. I want to know what subjects I should study. I’m halfway through Lang and Munkres, and started hartshorne a couple weeks ago, and I still don’t think I have enough to read most papers
what subjects could I study that are closer to research
This is not an appropriate place to ask about that application, the general channels are better for those. This channel is primarily for grad apps and maybe some stuff like reus
Sorry, I figured that a grant application would make sense here. I suppose not. I’ll try discussion
the topic does say grant apps too
the implication most likely being that of research grants or similar
being lumped in with postgrad and fellowship apps
Sounds reasonable. Also, in the box where it asks how much money you'll have available to fund yourself, if you don't have funding from someone else, put 0
where's that on the form?
the funding part of the form I saw was for US citizens (which i'm not) so skipped it
I can't even remember, I did this like a year ago so it's kind of half-remembered
It might have changed a bit since last year
And if you're not a US citizen, you'll probably have J1 or F1 visa status
This is a research grant
I thought
Has anyone here done a postgrad in Maths without doing an undergrad in it?
hey there, I'm currently taking up MS in mathematics, but my background is in Computer Science. I'm still on the very early stages though, and the university has required me to take up some bridging courses before I can proceed to the core courses.
I studied engineering physics, and did a PhD in numerical analysis (linear algebra)
Thanks, I’m considering applying for some maths masters courses with my undergrad in CS + Electronics. Just trying to gauge how easy it was to get accepted to good unis / courses and how your experiences have been so far while learning?
My understanding is that a lot of this depends on your coursework more than your labeled major
is there a LaTeX theme that automatically matches the guidelines for the NSF fellowship
like has the correct margins, font, font size, etc so I can be absolutely certain my application doesn't just get yeeted away
Uhh
You should check their requirements
Last year they very explicitly required word processing software, and you really can't get around that
Using LaTeX just isn't gonna work
Or at least, it wouldn't have last year @rapid dawn
(yes, this is very annoying)
sadly the number of gradschools that care about accounting for latex with their archaic sorting junk is not high :(
Well I'd be submitting a pdf
all of the forms I've seen are just pdf uploads thank god
It's just the dumb NSF app
How does European 10 point scale GPA get evaluated at US universities?
Does 9/10 correspond to 3.6/4 for example?
you should enter it as it appears on your transcript without trying to translate it
Yes, but I'm trying to understand my chances
ahhh fair enough
i doubt it gets considered the same way, 70% in the UK is a First which is way better than a 2.8/4 GPA (though some conversions seem overexcited comparing it to a 4.0)
yeah I've always assumed this was super ambitious bc normally around 25-30% of people get firsts and I assume 4.0 gpa is way way less common
Would imagine it's more comparable to a 3.7-3.8 but honestly no idea lol (no idea how they treat it though)
I am thinking of applying to places in prague due to
anyone living there or schooling there who can tell me what the culture is like
and also just in general how the czech republic treats lgbtq+ people (will i be safe)
this literally has to be an intentional method/technique to torture undergrads.
Do we still need GREs for math grad school ? I know that a lot of schools now have them "optional" but are they "optional" actually ?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hmdO7af3-lLvtJQO-szayG6blTvAYBQ1JcYXFZ_6apE/edit?usp=sharing
Google Docs
Google Docs
GRE Information
Please read the ABOUT tab of this file for information about this spreadsheet, including the people who update it.
University,USNWR Ranking,Department(s),Gen. GRE,Math Subj. GRE,Temporary?,This row last updated,Source:,Program Website:,Additional Notes:,Credit for key: James Guil...
Oh, thanks a lot. That's actually helpful
Do u think grad schools would be nice to me if I have limited research experience?
I’m kinda worried rn
Because I spent most of my undergrad doing swe internships at big n companies to pay off college
And as a result I don’t have as many relevant research experience as I like, only will have 2 sems by time I graduate
plenty of folks go to grad school with 0 research experience, let alone experience relevant to the field they'll work in. Just dont expect time in industry to do many favors unless you've gotten great references out of it
How helpful is it to email professors before applying to the said PhD program in USA or Canada. My friend in Physics said that a positive reply from professor almost guarantees admission in the uni but I not sure if that's true in maths. Some maths proffs outright say that they can't help with the admission process.
Also, if one does email does is it just "expressing interest in the field" or should I read an article/paper written by them and then say something about it etc.
I wrote emails to almost every professor at grad schools I applied to last cycle. I think I wrote to 10 or so. I asked each if I could have a Zoom call with them to introduce myself and talka bout their research, and I asked one if I could meet in-person because I happened to be visiting the campus. This was all before apps went out.
4 or so said no to meeting.
4 or so got in a Zoom call with me.
And the person that I wanted to meet in-person with said yes, and I had lunch with him.
None of this guarantees admission, but I absolutely think it helped and is a good idea, particularly if you have a unique application
i'll go ahead and ping you cause it's been a little while since you psoted
yup. woodin said yes, even
if you don't mind me asking, between those who declined meeting and those who actually met with you how were the places you got accepted into distributed
oh nice 
I got into zero. the reasons are completely unrelated
I only had two years in college, and finished a bachelor's and master's in this time. So I had a fuckton of grad classes and overall coursework, and a lot of knowledge in the area I wanted to do. But I had nothing else to my application. My graes were good, not great, and I had zero research experience.
the two admissions people/professors I spoke with after i got rejected everywhere said that my application was very strong, but way too fast and no research. My resume was like.. basically empty. Cause all I did was coursework.
and I was just too young
this was precisely the reason I was asking to Zoom. i was coming from a nowhere university, and had a very nontraditional application. niche research area, lots of classes, and weird transcript for other reasons (i took a dozen or so independent reading courses because of limited course offerings.)
so, yes. i did find out later that three of the schools (including my top choice, cmu) i was at the top top of the waitlist.
oh I see that makes more sense
i'm only saying this to explain that rejection had nothing to do with asking to Zoom. i'm fully convinced that i wouldve gotten rejected faster had i not done this
in the professors words that i had lunch with,
"the logicians at the universities you apply to will llove you, but the administration will hate you."
asking to Zoom for no reason seems bold, but if you have a weird app like this it makes more sense
correct. it does help if you have a paper of theirs in mind, or a topic in mind beforehand
but not necessary. i dint do that for many
oh interesting, i have a few potential advisors in mind who ill probs email but idk about zooming]
and for some, i would ask about some paper they wrote and then only briefly talked about it before going into personal application stuff
you also can't lose, unless you have serious concerns you'll fuck up the zoom call (you won't... its really really hard to do that). the worst case scenario is they say no
:^)
i see, this is a good idea ill ask for zoom if i email these potential advisors
yea. and if you are able to, it's not the worst idea tos ee if you can travel to one of the universities to see if you can meet in-person.
i happened to have a free flight voucher and also had like.. five or six friends that lived on campus, so it made sense for me to go regardless of whether they wanted to meet.
but i of course confirmed it beforehand
well thats probably overkill lol, but who knows maybe there is a conference in e.g. texas A&M
too bad I've already emailed hamkins 
email em again :))
hamkins is a saint do not be worried about him lol
you could literally just @ him on twitter (on another account, dork) and he'd set up a time to meet with you on Zoom in the replies
absolute king
I'll ping him and say "I LOVE LEAN" and then ask him if he wants to work on Schanuel's conjecture or smth
my hero
oh hi Luna I think I know you from twitter
wait maybe I do too
yuh
oh, I think maybe you were the one that directed the one person to me for findign the thing in the napkin taht was just wrong
Math Twitter converges
I've been dragging people on here to twitter
I literally can't find the thing, but it was mentioned by someone, it was some like AT computation
woah chmonkey followed me on twitter dot com. another gold star onto my chmonkey throne
maybe I can think up some funky computation problem to lure him in on MO
After asking question: oh and btw Hamkins, can I meet with you on Zoom?
HI CHMONKEY

or does that come later
"hamkins i promise the feet tweet was a joke please"
when appa are sent and ppl start checking the cursed websites
aren't you waiting another year?
br.uh
or for me "please just don't read any of my tweets"
cum is the seminal work of body fluids
God my algebra professor from undergrad liked something deranged earlier
"its for the bit u wouldnt understand"
So far two people have messaged me out of concern on Twitter before we interacted in person 
Luna was one of them
lmfao
love that
if shamrock can do it why can't I 😭
hate to say it but skill issue
You need to be better at posting and math tox
Sex is so cummypilled. I used to be hornycore but now I'm orgasm gang for real.
this
RYC sent this message and I just put it on twitter
I'm ballmaxxing
ok this is probably not the right convo for the channel
Oh
lol
Right
then upper classmen asked me about it when I visited
anyhow changing topic
no
i'm in my ballmax arc
purdue grad school seems sick
.pin
LMFAO
and have bad twitter presence
L
I started my twitter presence after getting into a good school😎
anyone know how it ranks in terms of hard to get into
They're stuck with me
honest question: what are the odds admissions at columbia looked at your twitter @torpid echo
Idk anything about Purdue
My friend is at Purdue rn I think
they have 4 C* algebraists which is a lot lol
probably very little, but at the start of the year Johan who I want to work with did say he found my twitter

but htey also have like, a lot of nt, AG ,top and model theory
which is all shit i like
where is Purdue
well except AG
in the freezer aisle
who tf is at purdue in model theory?
they make nice frozen tendies
Wisconsin?
indiana 😭
LMAO
HAHA MIDWEST
L bozo
I forget Purdue is in Indiana
i dont think these ppl are like pure model theory
more like apply model theory to there work
I'm chewing on a bottle cap rn
same
It's called stimpacking
like they had a class on minimal intersections in AG this yr
the cap is metal 
Chmonkey sharpening teeth
honestly moreso I'm just trying to poke a hole through it
holy shit dark kevin
Wdym dark kevin
oh no..
kevin buzzard
kevin buzzard :/
Yeah but what makes gregery dark kevin tho
https://twitter.com/heademptyset/status/1574646114871087105?s=20&t=08jxd3yPSPJ07SxAf1jNzQ are you proud of me
he's actually a logician
i'm entering my Poasting arc
I'm gonna meet him irl
Tox you should pin "I love lean" on your twitter
oh fuck
rip bozo
LMAO that makes this even better
ok thats actually so false worstie
lol
so fudking rue
love that buzzard's actually in this server
I'll ask my friend, I think she's asleep rn, but she applied for NT I think
love you kevin please don't ruin my career kevin
icic
im applying to operator theory bc its very hard to find operator theory research 
U shood apply to Chmolumbia cuz the school is cool
unless the ppl here don't do what u want kekw
no inner model theory???
my freshman year advisor is now the head of purdue math
no school in ny has operator tyheory chmonkey

not a real subject
arithmetic geo is like
jk, don't do that, 3 of the 7 ppl this year do NT
my 2nd choice
where are the mice
I have a feeling next year, they are not gonna be kind to ppl appying for NT
I think you should be fine though John, especially since you do have kind of a niche interest
there are some good C* schools thqat i feel like i have to get into
like iowa
htf is iowa gonna reject me lol
lmfao
Yeah, unless they really don't want C* people
all C* is in the midwest I guess
Yeah Midwest
are we in the midwest
toxus
No
wait Luna r u also at CUM
no i wish 
is my top choice when i apply
Pittsburgh is definitely the east
i moved here
ah
central michigan uni was advertising here and they also go by CMU, i was very confused for a bit lol
in an attempt to
- escape where i was
- when i end up applying, i am right around all the set theory i could ever want. gonna try to be somewhat involved before i apply
Pittsburgh isn't midwest, it's just rust belt
Yeah
Pittsburgh is the pitts.
It gets thrown into Appalachia with West Virginia sometimes
pissobrg
Real, this city is depressing as hell
fake news
I THOUGHT YOU SAID U LIKED IT
Bro (gender neutrally) wean hall has no windows

My office is on the 7th floor!
all the grad student offices are floor 4 or above here
I actually have a window tho
It's weird because the math building is like small and so the grad offices are a shared place, like cubicles
but it's important enough to not be like "MIller hall"
or someshit
it's literally called "mathematics"
aren't UChicago offices kinda 
wexler building is like
7 stories
stories 4-7 is purely for profs and grad students
basically
I wish
tru
Not sure if this is the place but does anyone know what schools to look at for additive combinatorics? I know Cambridge and Oxford are big but I go to a pretty much unknown school in the US so I'm not sure of my chances as an international applicant. There's also UGA and GA Tech who have some good people but I'm not sure outside of that.
uhh the only person I know who does this stuff is Minh Tran at Notre Dame, but that's like from an applied model theory perspective I think
Tao did this stuff right?
do we have anyone in this area in this server?
maybe @ornate gazelle knows something
I don't think so
but maybe try looking for some interesting papers and then checking out the authors
and most fields have like
some kind of database of people in the field
try searching for it
Hm maybe Tao keeps one since he's involved in the field
my primary tool in selecting schools to apply to
lol
also try talking to ur profs irl
they usually have a good idea and good reccs
Good idea, they do that NYC discrete math reu which seems cool
I asked my advisor and he actually had no clue but most of his stuff is in enumeration so he said he doesn't really work too much with additive or arithmetic
i see
that's wild
anyone at your uni who does some work in additive combo or adjacent field?
There's two people I'm thinking who might know one who does analytical nt and one who does partition theory though I don't really know the latter well
i see, i mean might be good to talk to them regardless
One of the people who runs the REU does additive combinatorics apparently
Looks like UIUC has 2 professors
I was talking to a friend but holy shit that one question somehow spiralled down to CMU and CUM
Cum? @raw quail
Thanks for the answer @fair needle. I am kinda between the devil and deep blue see. I was initially interested in ML and so did my dissertation in ML and now it's hard to go into either Maths or CS. So, like I haven't decided the field I wanna work in and have low grades. So, I not sure if I should email to professors as I have do not have much to show but it doesn't hurt to talk to them so why not. But it's probably gonna need some luck to get a decent PhD
ML = machine learning or mathematical logic?
Realizing that ML works either way in the context of that message 
I immediately assumed machine learning bc that's where my interests are
I immediately assumed mathematical logic bc that's where my interests are
If you're coming out of a master's program, and you were doing machine learning, I suppose it might be fine to get some industry experience before applying to PhD programs? Idk how that's viewed in particular by admissions committees, but it might only just help you
If you're coming out of a bachelor's and wanting to pursue a PhD, a master's is a good intermediary step either way
machine learning
Based
Tbh I kinda hate the current state of research in ML or I should say Deep Learning cause most fancy stuff is there but holy shit if it isn't a goddamn rat race. My advisor would constantly push me to publish papers or try extending what I have already done. Nothing original so I had no incentive to stay in it.
Yeah, I will probably do that if I don't get admission in this admission cycle. I know industry experience is viewed favourably in CS idk how much help will it do for maths PhD
I'm mostly interested in variational approaches and gradient flows in ML
There's a good paper on this called machine learning from a continuous viewpoint
wow thanks for this
confirms that I've pretty much exhausted UK unis lol since I recognise all the unis
physical finance or financial physics 
According to Gowers it's related to harmonic analysis, analytic number theory, extremal number theory, probability, model theory and theoretical computer science. At least that's the list of related fields he gave when lecturing additive combi last year.
I've seen the model theory interestingly enough
I didn't really understand it though

Malliaris told me to learn some additive combi for model theory
Or at least said that there's some cool stuff developing
(links between the two)
I stumbled across a very minor link as well
Or I think it's minor at least
Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences
I will discuss a joint work with Yifan Jing and Souktik Roy where we show that for two bivariate polynomials with coefficients in fields with char 0 to simultaneously exhibit small expansion, they must exploit the underlying additive or multiplicative structure of the field in nearly identical fashion. Within combinatorics, this generalizes a re...
this was what I saw
nice i got a grada appa fee waiver for notra dame from this name exchange program
gonna see how else i can get some more
Some schools give need-based fee waivers (aka you make less than a certain amount per year)
There are also schools who just give fee waivers if you ask
I know Utah has been like that in the past
oh good to know
Yeah that's something I wish I knew was a thing when I was applying bc money was tight
do i just like, email them or smth?
If you're asking about Utah in particular, you send an email to one of the department people, and it's outlined here https://www.math.utah.edu/graduate/GraduateInstructions.php
Idk about other schools, but I'd scour the graduate application website to see if there's anything. It also doesn't hurt to email the graduate program I don't think
right i see
I just remember during one of the EDI meetings last semester, we were discussing how there are a lot of fee waivers that go unused
Are you applying this cycle? @crimson valve
yeah
3 year gang 😎
gonna try to get a bunch of free appa like this, because like, no opportunity cost to apply to these right
Yeah exactly
Especially if your interests are still pretty flexible (although I know you're pretty set on C*)
yeah i can do a lot of other things too if i dont have a satisfactory C* thing
(specially since C* is kinda rare)
Utah is a good place to go too regardless if that's where things end up taking you as well, so might as well apply for free if you can
yeah
Just realized I misread part of a paper and now I need to work a lot harder on my NSF proposal ahhhhh
When's the NSF application due?
oct 21
I thought abstract harmonic analysis was cool but that's even worse in this regard
C* algebras are extremely common in comparison xd
would've been far easier if i was into algebraic geometry or topology or something
yeh cool until your doing perturbation theory wthi linear operators
Oh shit, I forgot that that might be a part of it 💀
I'm writing my statements rn
◉◡◉
There's so much I want to say, its hard to make it coherent
How do I write broader impacts for my research statement
Its not like studying modular forms will have broader societal impacts..
Broader Impacts: The broader impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes
I've done a lot but like, this is the research statement. I need to make it at least somewhat tangentially related to my research
Actually not that I'm thinking about it, I can actually connect those things to my research
Everything's connected
◉◡◉
Yeah
Thanks
I WROTE A FIRST DRAFT OF MY RESEARCH STATEMENT YAYYY
Isn't the broader societal impact of funding mathematics research an expected decrease in the number of domestic terrorists
I am learning this quickly
Can someone provide more details on this please? I should be aware of what I plan to get myself into.
wait you're telling me it gets worse?
what if I already feel things to be that wayish without even being in grad school
A bit of introspection on how you are currently managing the stress might be a good idea.
it's usually fine if I meet my friends regularly, things start to deteriorate if I do everything by myself constantly though
Quite good that you have already recognised it.
none of these points seem like something I haven't experienced to some degree already, or well at least something new, but I'm not sure if the intensity will change (if I manage to get in) and I'm already broke anyways, can't get broker than that
From my month long experience so far, it goes without saying, but creating a support system of people around you is crucial for keeping mental health in check, at least in my case
Although, I stayed in my home state for undergrad so this is a pretty new thing for me
So the NSF fellowship says you need to use a certain font and you'll get automatically rejected if you don't. How does that interact with stuff like \mathcal
Not that I'd actually use TeX since they apparently want the whole thing done in Word. But for inserting a character like that into word

