import sys
def readstr(): return sys.stdin.readline().strip()
def readfloats(): return list(map(float, readstr().split()))
while(True):
N, W = readfloats()
N = int(N)
if (N == 0 and W == 0.0000):
break
max_h = 0
sum_width = 0
total = 0
for i in range(N):
h, w = readfloats()
if sum_width + w > W:
total += max_h
sum_width = w
max_h = h
else:
if(h > max_h):
max_h = h
sum_width+=w
total += max_h
print (f"{total:.4f}")
``` i believe my code is good as it pass the test on the file but it marks wrong answer, is something wrong in my logic ? thanks for reading here the link to the online judge problem : https://onlinejudge.org/index.php?option=com_onlinejudge&Itemid=8&page=show_problem&category=0&problem=1180&mosmsg=Submission+received+with+ID+29872353#🔒 Test veifiried but code not passing in online judge
lost pecan
stiff kayakBOT
```python
import sys
def readstr(): return sys.stdin.readline().strip()
def re...
@lost pecan
Python help channel opened
wide cosmos
What's the while True: for? Are you actually expecting several batches of numbers?
lost pecan
Yes as in the problem they said it stops until the line 0 0.0000 appear thats why i put while true
There is a test with 5 30.0000 ( 5 books, results is 60) and one with 10 20.0000 (10 books result is 65à
wide cosmos
Yes as in the problem they said it stops until the line 0 0.0000 appear thats wh...
Oh so it does, it's even handl;ed in your code. Missed that.
lost pecan
no problem !
wide cosmos
Your online judge output looks like a time limit was reached.
Try changing this: print (f"{total:.4f}") into this: print (f"{total:.4f}", flush=True) to see if you get any output back from the online judge. (Python output is buffered, so it might not get out before the timeout if the buffer doesn't fill. This flushes the buffer as soon as you print.)
Doesn't change your programme behaviour, may provide better indication of what's going on.
I don't suppose you know what input it is being tested with?
lost pecan
Unfortunately no they only give the sample given in the file i send but i was warned that judges were more harsh on python because of the time
i'll test out your solution
i still have wrong answer
wide cosmos
I expect it to still be wrong. I was hoping the report showed some of your print()s in the output.
I don't see anything in the code which is inherently slow.
And I don't expect it to spin forever if you somehow miss the end-of-data 0 0.0000 pair - it should just fail if so. So I'm puzzled.
You could put in a print() after the N, W = readfloats() line to show N and W; it might show you what size data they're giving you, and maybe show some loss of sync with the input data, though your code looks correct to my eye for that.
stiff kayakBOT
Python help channel closed