#ot1-perplexing-regexing
1 messages ยท Page 544 of 1
cute โค๏ธ
google is making me v angi rn, for authenticating all the docs say pretty much is to use the libs they make
but like, I want to make my own lib asyncly with aiohttp and stuff, so that won't do
I can auth, but like that "access token" expires, and I am getting that token via GOOGLE_API_KEY = subprocess.run(['gcloud', 'auth', 'application-default', 'print-access-token'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).stdout.decode().replace("\n", "")
so I have no clue how to either:
- Properly auth without messy stuff like that so expiring creds aren't an issue
or - Get new creds without having to recall that command because that sounds ehh
their docs seem like they may contain useful info somewhere but every page redirects me somewhere to tell me to use the "client libraries" which I don't want to because that is going to cause me to depend on them and I don't want to have to depend on google bullshittery other than actually calling the API
wouldn't this work? https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2
or does google cloud not support oauth2
or thishttps://cloud.google.com/identity-platform/docs/use-rest-api, you have a static token which you exchange for an access token and a refresh token
well, I'm trying to use a service account and also I don't reallly understand oauth2 lol
I have a .json with some stuff like a private key and some urls
yeah, google auth is pretty complex, since it uses pretty much the most complex, secure flows
so you have expiring tokens, refresh tokens, codes you exchange for tokens with state and all that nonsense
Hey @runic mantle!
It looks like you tried to attach file type(s) that we do not allow (.json). We currently allow the following file types: .gif, .jpg, .jpeg, .mov, .mp4, .mpg, .png, .mp3, .wav, .ogg, .webm, .webp, .flac, .m4a.
Feel free to ask in #community-meta if you think this is a mistake.
yeah, currently I am playing with the idea of just catching that auth expired message and recalling the gcloud auth application-default print-access-token command to get a new token lol
Hmm. JSON files aren't allowed?
honestly this is going way over my head because all I am trying to do is call the https://texttospeech.googleapis.com/v1/text:synthesize and maybe /voices sometimes but this auth stuff is killing me
instead of using the module, make a request
you are unlikely to find a shortcut, you will just have to do this properly if you want it to work well.
yes that's the entire idea of what I am trying to do but I don't know how to, where to send it to, what to send, and when to refresh
what worked for me when doing a similar thing with discord was just very slowly and carefully reading the docs multiple times
right then, it seems by my eyes drifting I found https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/service-account#jwt-auth which looks like what I want
that does look about right
because I'm making a premium feature for a TTS discord bot, which uses the official TTS endpoints instead of doing janky stuff with google translate
right then, after I have lunch I'm restarting into arch and playing around with this
can't wait to have to add another 3 libs to my requirements.txt lol
Ik a guy who wrote a library for the discord api
ye, its just passing requests around a lot
but uh with autohotkey
I mean, if ahk can write to a socket, why not
anyone ever used a pihole before?
static_headers = {"Content-Type": "application/json; charset=utf-8"}
@property
def headers(self):
# Handle lazy loading of Bearer token, allowing auth_token to easily be modified after instantiated.
headers = {}
headers.update(self.static_headers)
headers.update("Authorization": f"Bearer {self.auth_token}"})
return headers``` this feels good
@property is a good tool
i have forgotten those ๐
But how does property work to receive it and such
Like
How would that run when using .headers vs .headers = 'new thing'
basically: it means existing code can continue to do self.headers but now if auth_token changes the headers will change aswell
Right but
How can it get and receive them
*what code runs for getting vs setting a property method
Or are you not able to set property methods
I don't think you can set property methods iirc
anyway, is it a good idea to make a new JWT per request?
@scenic blaze migrating here since it's a bit less on topic for that channel. What I saw was just advice like "getting a master's is always objectively good because it means you're a master in the subject. It's in the name"
Haha
or "yeah, just apply to jobs indiscriminately and always negotiate" when it was like... about a very specific job market that has different requirements and expectations
and one person was misinformed that people could volunteer for a for-profit job. That got out of hand quickly because people were just dogpiling
Okay, that makes sense how intervention would be needed.
How are you liking being an admin, btw? I've been pretty busy, but from what snippets I've seen in announcements it seems like you've really taken to it.
haha, I'm enjoying it
I look more busy than I actually am because what I deal with is very public facing
That makes sense. Glad you're enjoying it! I wish I could take a more active role in non-career things, but it's just not happening for the time being. Working on some major projects that I'm staking my name/career on.
ooooh nice. You still working for that med company?
Yup! My project is super exciting, I wish I could share about it.
MODERATOR LUL
More coverage of The Last Of Us Part 2 - https://bit.ly/2YeSwgK
Subscribe Here! http://bit.ly/VideoGameSophistrySub
For Video Game Sophistry-
Twitter: https://twitter.com/VGSophistry
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/videogamesophistry/
#LastOfUs2 #VGS #LastOfUsPart2
- All content is recorded and user created, with either commentary or edit...
this made me sad
lol, i never played or watched playthroughs of tlou bc i find the plot too simple and dragged out
the plot was simple in tlou yeah
but it's simple for a reason
and simple stories work really well
and that is?
bc they work well
true, the graphics and mechanics more than compensate for any lack of depth in plot
you don't need a super complicated story for a game
TLOU 2 has some strange issues with the story
oop- "C A T A S T R O P H E"
these are convention for telling a story
the last of us 2 completely kills the rising action by shifting to Abby's perspective
kills any sense of momentum
"Gravity" (2013) be like:
yes I understand they were trying to do something different
but as the saying goes
you don't need to reinvent the wheel
lol true
lol predictable plots
it would make more sense to kill him somewhere near the climax
yeah, randomly killing off characters at the start before the audience even gets a chance to bond with them is not a good idea
well the audience bonds with Joel in the first game
ah, like rise all the way up, boring, then climax
oh yeah, forgot about that ๐
Hi :D
Neil alienated a huge part of the fanbase
like people really wanted to see Joel and Ellie banter and stuff
cool
and their relationship
hi :D
but he decided you know what
what will bring me the most shock value in a game
oh yes that's right let's kill Joel near the beginning of the game
is it?
the plot is structured terribly
don't get me started on the supporting characters
it's not black and white but a little shock at first does no harm
there's not even a hint that Joel lost his survivor skills
he really just walks himself straight into the center of the room
with people armed
although some movies/games use a "prologue" to get you all hyped up then a long time of BORINGNESS
oop-
and "y'all are acting like you know me"
I'm sorry
no one can justify that to me
you're telling me he murdered the entire hospital that was going to help sacrifice Ellie for the cure
and he just goes out and gives his full name?
plus the countless other people he's murdered
I find it very hard to believe
that would be like Batman just deciding to plunge himself into a fight he can't win with no planning
my mate's just going on a rant while i have no idea who are these characters lol
no fan would accept that
Lol
that's why we already have python3 ๐
from datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime.datetime import datetime.datetime
mood
the examples for hashlib are funny https://docs.python.org/3/library/hashlib.html
My dad loves the monty python references whenever I show him python docs lol
That's cool you can connect with your dad like that.
hahah imagine having a dad
... a day at the beach ... is better ...
Srsly tho why is it datetime.datetime
I'm making a discord bot base module that is bot.bot.bot.bot
Recently I found the dateparser module. Is that popular?
yeah why didn't they just put the functions in the folder
!d datetime
Source code: Lib/datetime.py
The datetime module supplies classes for manipulating dates and times.
While date and time arithmetic is supported, the focus of the implementation is on efficient attribute extraction for output formatting and manipulation.
because its datetimes, timezones, and timedelta
it's really nice
!pypi dateparser
can i ask what distribution of linux should i use ?
Definitely not Mint or Manjaro
Alright first things first
The term you're looking for is distro/distribution, not version
And next, it's a pretty subjective thing
Some of it yeah, but for example, I love manjaro
I used to love it, too
And I've seen plenty of people loving mint
and everyone does until it breaks
Mint has had some pretty bad things happen, too
iirc there was a FrakenDebian because of it
what is like the most used distributions ?, and which one mostly has the windows programs ?
but beginners should not be using Arch
i want to use elementryOS, it looks like mac
Linux doesn't have "Windows programs" but Ubuntu and its flavors are the most supported on cross-platform distros
I've also heard ElementaryOS is notoriously bad
Anonymously-posted copy of another
Introduction
Manjaro is a Linux distribution based on the Arch Linux distribution. It focuses on accessibility, friendliness and stability.
However, there has been several major controversies regarding Manjaro over the years. This gist is aimed to address all kn...
Yeah I haven't heard great things about elementryOS
but damn it really looks cool
You can make any distro with GNOME look like that
what is this ?
List of controversies of Manjaro
I'll make a quick list of solid distros I'd (and much of the Linux community would) recommend
Ubuntu
Xubuntu
Kubuntu (or KDE Neon)
Lubuntu (for low-end computers)
Ubuntu MATE (Alternative if you wanted Mint)
OpenSUSE Leap
Fedora
Mageia
Arch
OpenSUSE Tumbleweed
can i have both windows and linux on a same hard disk ?
Yes, that's called dual booting
I'd recommend the distros towards the top
If you're into gaming, most games are tested on Ubuntu, and will probably work the same on any of the flavors
look on my family pc we have: 3 windows on different partitions, and i want to install linux on my partition, how can i do that
Same as you would Windows
Window's arguably more difficult to install than Ubuntu
It's easier than you think
some people don't agree linux is a proper OS 
no like when you have more than one windows there will be a booting screen that says "choose your windows volume", so, how can i run my linux
u use grub to pick which os to load
GRUB will do that for you
and when u install ur os there is an option to add grub too
yeah but what should i change there ?, there is a, 4S-... , and when that is in the top the windows will be load
I don't think GRUB is optional, though
I don't know what you're asking
its optional if u pick the manual partition
You're confusing boot order for boot menu, I think
you said i have to change my booting right ?, but what should i change there
like the installer doesnt care if u even allocated enough space for grub
I never said you had to change anything
well u do have to disable secure boot
oh i felt you said because of this
.
bc otherwise grub is blocked from running
You're confusing boot order for boot menu
boot menu allows you to pick which partition to boot into
boot order defines the default order in which things will boot
If you want to boot into GRUB first, you'll want to move the Linux partition to the top
Anyways, as long as you pick one of the distros I listed above, you'll mostly be fine
but as a beginner, stay away from Arch/OpenSUSE Tumbleweed
but i want to install linux on my windows hard drive, so how what order should set, when they are on the same hard drive
partition the drive
usually os installers allow u to partition ur drive or u can do it with a tool
Don't change the order of the partitions
that's different from what I said
my pc is a family pc, and there is 3 partitions that windows are installed on that partitions
Boot order != Partition order
If you move the partitions around, you might accidentally wipe your entire drive
well before u partition make sure there is space to partition
also since other ppl r using the computer make sure u dont delete their stuff
no i have space on my windows C drive
lol but no
Honestly, I don't think I'd advise installing linux to that machine if you don't know what you're doing
If you go around moving partitions, you might wipe your system
before u decide to dual boot
i think i kidna get it, i think because i don't know a lot English im having problem understanding
Maybe, but I still don't know if I'd advise it
If you think you know what you're doing, go for it
Again, it's about the same if you'd installed Windows
Just make sure you pick a good distro from the ones in that list
all of those are solid
Arch/OpenSUSE Tumbleweed aren't beginner-friendly, but they're better than Manjaro/Endeavor/Garuda
That's irrelevant depending on your scope
and which one is like the most balanced one like, can run codes has apps and games
Ubuntu is the most tested and supported
ok
and its flavors
but even myself who uses Arch doesn't have much problems
but then again, I only play Minecraft from time to time
KDE is not a distribution, what're you trying to do
if you want Ubuntu with KDE, get Kubuntu
Kubuntu = KDE + Ubuntu
i just searched Kubantu and found this pictures
Ubuntu = Ubuntu + GNOME
Kubuntu = Ubuntu + KDE Plasma
Xubuntu = Ubuntu + XFCE
Lubuntu = Ubuntu + LXQt
and its says that this is KDE Plasama
KDE is a desktop environment, you don't really "download" it
If you wan KDE, either go for Kubuntu or KDE Plasma
idk about the KDE spins on the other distros, but you probably want Kubuntu or KDE Neon
KDE is pretty awesome on all distros I have used
I've been using Arch with KDE, it's pretty neat
I used KDE Neon for a bit, but broke because of nvidia drivers
one question it may sound weird but
i can change the wallpaper in ubantu right ?
i asked that because im comparing the ditros and i only see the same ubantu purple to yellow wallpaper and that was weird for me
๐คฃ
I mean if you look up "Kubuntu" ofc you're gonna find Ubuntu wallpapers lol
like if you search "Windows 10", you're gonna find Windows wallpapers
You're spelling it wrong btw
yes but typing doesn't have much to do with it lol
it's just spelling, it's Ubuntu but you keep saying Ubantu
that might sound rude but.. thought I'd point it out
oh its Ubuntu ?
Yes, it's Ubuntu
i thought it was Ubantu ? it was kidna making sense reading it for me in my own language,
no it ok ๐คฃ
It's Ubuntu lol
is it wrong if i shrink my C drive for installing linux ?
No, just be careful
i feel like that's a dumb question ๐คฃ
you shrink too much and all of your data goes poof
"and that's called magic" ๐คฃ
that's called a mistake I almost did once
lol
no
Ubuntu itself is the OS
Ubuntu = Ubuntu + GNOME wouldn't make sense in that regard
you'd end up with some form of recursion lol
um. no clue
love KDE
I also heard GNOME 40 has had some negative reception so far
@latent scaffold do you know garuda ?
yes, I do
no
stop right there
The only sane distributions are
Ubuntu
Kubuntu
Xubuntu
Lubuntu
KDE Neon
OpenSUSE Leap
Mageia
NixOS
Void
Fedora
RHEL
Arch
OpenSUSE Tumbleweed
Debian
Ubuntu MATE
Ubuntu Budgie
Gentoo
Alpine Linux
Anything else is honestly not worth using
No mint, no manjaro/endeavor/garuda, no elementary, no pop
also definitely not Kali/Parrot
Can i know why ?
Did I not sent you the Manjaro controversies link?
manjaro's p nice
Anonymously-posted copy of another
Introduction
Manjaro is a Linux distribution based on the Arch Linux distribution. It focuses on accessibility, friendliness and stability.
However, there has been several major controversies regarding Manjaro over the years. This gist is aimed to address all kn...
People who can't go through the trouble of Arch, shouldn't be using Arch
The installation is trivial compared to the problems one might face
Especially Manjaro, it's notorious for breaking constantly
So garuda is based on arch ?
Yes, it is
To quote that website
The issues in this gist is common with any Arch derivative, but especially bad with Manjaro. Please consider using pure Arch Linux, or use another distro not based on Arch Linux.
I don't think you realize the nature of Linux distributions
Looks are independent of distribution
You can make any distribution look however you want
it's not the distro that dictates how things look
For example, you can make Ubuntu look almost exactly like Manjaro
Well, depending on the DE
DE = Desktop Environment. GNOME, XFCE, KDE Plasma are all DEs
KDE on Arch will look about the same as KDE on Ubuntu
You can make any distro look like how Garuda does
Sorry for the text wall there lol
basically don't go based off of looks
I won't deny distros like Manjaro look nice
but that shouldn't be a deciding factor
Beginners don't know that any distro can look the exact same
i use garuda and its good
and in my experience, garuda has not broken once
but manjaro did like twice
I wouldn't suggest it, though
a cool thing about Linux is figuring out how to fix stuff when it breaks.
Then again, we're talking about Arch to a beginner
ubuntu is probably better for a beginner
Exactly
but I guess it depends on how savvy the beginner in question is
arch can be ok for a beginner. I started with Slackware.
I mean regardless of how savvy
Arch's definitely not okay for a beginner D:
I can only speak from what I've seen from beginners, Arch as a first distro hardly ever pans out well
Starting with Ubuntu is a great choice for anyone... or even like Fedora/OpenSUSE Leap
or garuda :)
no
yes
You can't seriously tell me that the archiso installation is that hard
huh?
that you have to install a sketchy derivative for potentially worse results
I think trying different distributions with different init styles could be interesting for someone.
I don't get the point of Arch derivatives
I think Ubuntu and Fedora are both using systemd now right?
They market for beginners, and complain that if someone breaks their distro it's not their fault
Manjaro's notorious for that, too
If something breaks because you updated something, it's your fault
not because they don't test packages properly
plus, Arch is a rolling distro. It's not exactly stable
Pretty much every sane distro is
rEFInd isn't used much
That's a highly subjective take. I don't like systemd myself.
No, I'm not saying rEFInd isn't sane
I'm saying that the sane distros use systemd
but that's not what makes them sane
ah
I don't personally have a problem with systemd, but maybe I'm just not knowledgeable enough
the ditros that i relly like now, but my mind is blowing about this arch thing, and i f-ing don't know what to do, as well as you said "you can change the looking" but i can't change how they work
the ditros i like right now are:
#1. Deepin ( it really looks like mac )
#2. Garuda ( it's cool )
#3. Ubuntu
#4. Zorin OS ( don't know why )
What do you mean "can't change how they work"
it's hard to say from, what i saw and i have not using them, and i don't know if they will be changeable, let's just leave that sentence there
You're too new to know what can be easily changed
which is why I hate the propaganda pushed by "beginner" distros
Honestly, just pick Kubuntu and start somewhere
It's not that big of a decision as you're making it seem
if you want something that looks like mac, go with Ubuntu or Fedora
ummm
keeping in mind that everything can eventually be changed
its says here that Deepin is based on Debian
Man, do yourself a favor and pick a distribution from the list
I promise you'll be much better off in the long run
I can't tell what you're looking for, but your searching for alternatives is needless... You just don't see it yet
You don't know what you don't know and it's driving you insane
So just take a deep breath and go with something, learn about it, and customize it
I myself made the mistake of going with Manjaro as my first distribution. Yes, I liked it... but I never realized what I was missing until I started testing
So much was broken and I didn't even realize. I thought it was just a "Linux thing", that it happens simply because it's the nature of Linux
I switched to Xubuntu, made it look like Manjaro XFCE and I was sooo much happier
I may push this sort of "elitism", but I swear you're much better off going with something more stable
So I would say go with an Ubuntu flavor, learn about it, and when you start to feel like Ubuntu doesn't meet your needs, pursue a more advanced distribution
All these other distributions aren't as good as they seem, and you should take the time to figure that out yourself
damn
I text walled again \๐ฉ
basically, there's a lot more to it than you'd think
Xubuntu is my most used distribution, and it was amazing
Everything was so much simpler and things actually worked
For example, my audio. Didn't work at all on Manjaro, had to do some really sketchy things to get it to work
Even on Arch, it was so much easier to get working
all I had to do was sudo pacman -Syu sof-firmware and bam
i use linux mint btw
D:
not so much as "use" as much as "have a laptop with mint lying around and nobody uses it"
I mean there's no reason to use Mint
give me one plus that Mint has over something like Ubuntu MATE
Again, looks are deceiving
like Xunbuntu has horrible defaults
but you just install a theme and some icons and suddenly it looks exactly like Manjaro but 10x better
People are so often turned off by the images on Google, but that's just not the reality
Looks are not everything, and it's annoying to see that as the deciding factor
well
i have used ubuntu irl too
use might be a strong word
i have worked on ubuntu irl
Meh, when I was picking out a distribution I made the same mistake
of going Google, looking at the images
picking whatever looked the coolest
i went by the advice of people here ๐
Honestly, I hate seeing people recommend Manjaro
People just don't realize how bad it actually is
hiella
like in many Linux communities, Manjaro has literally become a meme
._.
I quite like Arch, honestly
I don't go bragging about it, but I still like it
debian and ubuntu for me
Wise choice
Debian's a little weird for desktop use, honestly
Too old and stable for me
but for beginners, I think they think that whatever they pick they're stuck with

they don't realize how versatile Linux really is D:
fwiw im running 3 different distros excuse me
lol
and a beginner
you are using Xunbuntu ?
Which ones?
and its a pain in the fucking ass
I was, but I'm not anymore
what are you using now ?
debian and ubuntu and then raspberry pi os
I'm using Arch
sudo apt-get install windows :kek:
I like it, but again, I wouldn't recommend it
so basically 3 computers with debian and one with ubuntu

I wouldn't recommend Arch, but you were given the choice between Arch, Endeavor, Garuda or Manjaro, you should pick Arch
how many eyes emotes do you have
If you can't install Arch, you're not going to be able to fix it when it breaks
im gonna have to dm that
BRUHHHH
i just watch a review and testing Deepin on a VM in it was SH*** AF
im gonna install ubuntu
done
also keep in mind, Linux YouTubers aren't that trustworthy
they are memes as well
don't know
let's see more people
but the weird part for me is Deepin is based on Debian not Arch
and you are still hating it
I don't hate Arch derivatives because they're based on Arch
it's because they're all shady
I can't say much in the word of Deepin, but I know that it's not a good pick either
which one is better KDE or GNOME ?
I prefer KDE
KDE epic
@heavy halo https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/
Feel free to see what's possible, notice how people customize things on like Arch/Ubuntu. Distro is irrelevant
You'll notice a lot of i3/i3-gaps/bspwm, but look for XFCE/KDE/GNOME
i3/i3-gaps/bspwm are tiling window managers, you're probably not looking for anything regarding them atm
one question where can i find Garuda multimedia ?
like the normal version Garuda that has normal icons
garuda site
downloads tab
RIP. all my convincing has done nothing
no don't worry
im just downloading the distors i like so if i uninstalled the one i didn't like, i have at least save some time for myself for downloading them again

that is not in the website
it is
you sure ?
i know
What am I not understanding
could Garuda Wayfire be the replacement for the multimedia version ?
idts
wtf is multimedia
i feel like im giving him anxiety ?
there was a another version of Garuda distort in it was called multimedia if im not wrong
What was it for?
wdym ?
the only it's difference was that there was no gaming icons
wtf are gaming icons
ye candy icons knew it
man. if you're installing Garuda just for that, I'm so concerned
you can get that so easily on any distro with KDE
bruh im not only downloading it for that
im just downloading it
for no reason
the only reason that im downloading if i didn't like other distors
I'm saying that Garuda isn't even a good fall-back option
like
there's not even a reason to fall-back on anything
Whatever Garuda offers won't be enough to differentiate it from something like Arch
if you set up Arch to look exactly like Garuda, you wouldn't even know the difference
if you noticed a difference, it'd be that Arch works better
is zorin OS bad ?
Yes
i haven't download that yet
You're only basing your decisions purely off of looks
it's one of my biggest pet peeves, honestly
Well, you should make it 0%
that sounded rude lol
didn't mean for it to
anyways, you have to realize that looks don't matter
no its all good
Arch literally is a tty terminal from the beginning
but you see what people can do with it
All you have to realize is that with a few themes and some minor customization, you can have a great looking DE
You should just download a well-supported distro and stick with it
one question, can i change the orange color in ubuntu ? cause i googled my question and there was notthing
What do you mean the orange color
oh btw what about solos ?
Chances are, yes
I wouldn't recommend Solus, either
You're putting in too much thought
You can't go wrong with the list I've made
I feel like you're overthinking it, though
right now i have these distros: deepin - garuda - kubuntu - ubuntu
There's nothing about Ubuntu vs Arch that you'll want other than package manager
as a beginner, I mean
and Ubuntu is the most supported distro for most applications
Especially games, even Steam proton
There's no reason to use something like Garuda over Arch
and no reason to use Deepin over Debian/Ubuntu
you can get the same without the risks that come from them
there is and that its better for beginners and takes less time to install
and ig its has some features that might take a lot of uhh tinkering around in arch
You realize that maintaining an Arch desktop is harder than the installation, right?
also there's not much "tinkering" involved in Arch
You can't expect a beginner to know that sudo pacman -Sy + sudo pacman -S <package> can break their installation
and you can't expect them to know how to fix it
Which is why I believe Arch shouldn't be used by beginners at all
google :)
any google tutorial will tell you to use Syu
Would you expect a beginner to search for "What pacman commands should I not run"
no rather
because I personally didn't know that in the couple months that I used Manjaro
they would be like what do i do after getting arch linux
Didn't learn about it until I came across it in ArchWiki
when I was installing Arch
its not like you know things when using ubuntu too
Like what?
thing is, when you search how to use a new os for example, sites provide you with enough knowledge to get started
Syu in my case
doesnt matter
im not talking about that in particular
see, i believe that any person new to an os will google , how to use the os yes?
Nothing here about partial upgrades
ok manjaro is trash lol
see this
Answer
Setting initial mirrorlist
Open up "Reflector Simple" and make your choices. After testing the servers you will get a fresh mirrorlist.
Updating the system
Its a simple as opening the terminal and typing "sudo pacman -Syu". You will also find a shortcut to a GUI tool called Pamac in the startmenu which serves the same purpose.
Setting the terminal shortcut for updating mirrorlist and system at the same time
Open the file ~/.zshrc (you can do this via GUI or opening the terminal and typing "micro .zshrc") and find an alias called "#upd=...". Remove the "#" and change the options to fit your location and preferences. Now close the editor and type zsh to apply the change.
Downloading language packs
Some applications got language packs which are separated from the main application
(Firefox, Libreoffice, etc..). Usually you are required to download them manually however Garuda Linux is shipping the Garuda settings manager for that purpose. You will find a language pack option where you can select which language packs you want to download.
Setting the terminal theme
Garuda Linux is shipping with the Powerlevel10k zsh theme which makes working with the terminal easier. To set it up simply launch the terminal and answer the question of the setup wizard. Make sure to press yes until the actual theme choices pop up (the needed patched font is already included).```
Well, regardless
I personally would've have Googled anything like that
I mean Xubuntu worked fine for me out of the box, there's not much to know about it
ok , i admit, manjaro is weird
also I meant wouldn't have Googled anything like that
I read a lot of the ArchWiki, but that's because I know how low-level Arch is
and there are things I must know to prevent potential issues
You don't need that with something like Ubuntu
it just works and it's incredibly easy to use with some of the best stability
Manjaro, on the other hand is pretty much none of what it claims to be
and I imagine the other derivatives have the same issues
they mostly dont
Regardless, I don't think beginners should be using them
It feels almost wrong to market an Arch derivative as "beginner friendly"
also iirc, not even the Arch developers like the derivatives
arch devs usually talk about manjaro in reddit and stuff
Not sure, I don't use Reddit
but I doubt they talk about it in a positive manner
they have a code of conduct
like, they cant shame other distros publically or something idk
Well, that probably honestly misleads a lot of people
I don't even know what that is
anyways, I think people would benefit more if they knew what they were getting into
Manjaro sounds perfect on the surface
It really does, though. It makes all the right points to entice beginners
but it's terribly misleading
it's fucked up

@latent scaffold i think i see you in the Discord Linux server right ?
ah yes
let's move on to there to show why it sucks

No, I know it sucks, but beginners don't see that on the surface
but they will probably regret their choices when they see a black screen after boot
Meh, most people won't realize until they eventually switch
which... nobody can ever stay on Manjaro
they will all eventually switch
The real damage is that they've recommended everyone else to use it
I'm glad I found out all my issues were Manjaro specific
Even Arch itself has been a much better experience
The initial installation is daunting yet trivial
bruh
!warn 791341704694988821 Please try to keep comments on this server appropriate with our #code-of-conduct.
:incoming_envelope: :ok_hand: applied warning to @fresh ether.
ayo issa a joke damn.
Our code of conduct applies to jokes and serious content alike.
nobody walked into the chat, saw my message and went "BLASPHEMY!"
or is it blasfemy
hang on
yeah its blasphemy
If you'd like to discuss this further, feel free to reach out to @polar knoll, but that type of content is not welcome here.
I don't like modmail, I sent some mail to him, never got delivered, I'm filing a lawsuit against modmail for taking my mail ๐ก
What makes you assume I was referring to a woman's genitals?
I was talking about my grandma's cat.
Explain that. ๐ฅ
I'll explain to you that trying to troll here won't go down well.
It's not trolling, you really don't have to be so serious all the time, it was a joke.
That was a joke aswell.
Are jokes just not allowed here?
Jokes that violate our rules very much aren't
Okay, then what about the "Explain that", you assumed I was trolling when it was just really just a joke and basically threatened me with moderation, for a joke that didn't break any rules that time.
this is so obviously a joke with comical value regardless of it being unfunny or funny, it was never meant to troll.
If you believe I've abused my moderation abilities, feel free to reach out to @polar knoll
that'll get tossed out in seconds and I don't believe you abused your moderation abilities, I just think you need a spa day or something of the sort.
Ad personam won't help you
which one do you recommend? debian or ubuntu?
does it lightweight?
no
depends on your DE or WM
Weren't some other 'buntus lightweight?
I remember that there's kubuntu and xubuntu and i think one of them was lightweight. But I just use normal Ubuntu, so idk
xubuntu is lighter yes
I need a light and stable distro, can you please suggest me?
arch
i cant think of any other than xubuntu
light and stable is probably some build of debian, but it may be too stable for desktop use
is python 3.5 in debian stable yet?
too stable?
dunno how Debian versioning works but https://wiki.debian.org/DebianStretch has 3.5
debian stable updates packages very seldom, since they do thorough rigorous tests to ensure nothing breaks
ohh
which makes it a pain for programmers
but great for servers and such
RHEL is an even more extreme example of this
actually, stable looks to have 3.7
but well, that isn't free software, and centOS is no longer up to date.
oh nice, that is actually pretty good
I haven't installed debian in years, so IDK all that much
yeah, that is the main appeal of arch to me
not having to install most things from other sources to have up to date stuff
It was mostly the learning experience for me
DIY Linux, what could be any more fun?
DIY windows
oh no
oh yes
there really is no use of even being on linux for me as windows does most of the jobs linux can do
DIY apple
oh no
Step 1: find an Apple Tree
Sure, but Linux can do a lot that Windows cannot
Step 2: pay $1000
like tbh the reason Windows is the most used is because Windows is the most used
like

Windows has WSL too heh
like... KVM
can't do a KVM from WSL lol
Kernel-based Virtual Machine
basically... think of it as a more integrated VM
a machine running next to a machine rather than a machine within a machine
oh, whats its use
Well, cross-platform dev or like games that only run on Windows
KVMs run pretty great
doesn't work with games with mean anticheats, though
eh then whats the point of a KVM in windows??
ok i finally chose ubuntu, and i have one more question.
will ubuntu be lighter than windows?
KVM can't work in Windows lol
i guess yeah
Definitely. Much lighter
list the usecases of KVM
KVM won't run in Windows, but it can run Windows
They're VMs
but better
i honestly dont see the point of running windows in linux
Compatibility
cross-platform X
or maybe you're developing a program and want to make sure it runs on Windows as well
but Linux is much lighter than Windows is
and you can do a majority of things that you can't on Windows
not all distros but yyeah
no, pretty much all distros
yeah its recommended to have 6gb ram and stuff
you mean the full form is kool Vm's
Any sane distro is lighter than Windows
\๐ณ
AH MY EMOJI
WHAT HAPPENED

light doesnt appeal to me
its just tiny flush for me
oh no D:
yeah
wtf is this
lul
weird
oh no. I'm going to cry
i have the same problem in garuda
emojis are kinda messed
unicode ones
type soem weird letters or greek alphabets here
um. this is depressing
So you're telling me I can have โ but not \๐ณ
what is this.
oh no
oml why my emoji no work :( this is depressing
any of them
oh
no, I mean like
uhhh
is tailwind like bootstrap
Kind of, but better. https://tailwindcss.com/
@latent scaffold is POP OS bad ?
How ?
because all it does is save you a single command
which would be something like sudo apt install nvidia-driver-460
it's useless, it shouldn't exist
yet it does :/
um... You're not seriously considering ChromeOS, are you?
I don't think it's even possible to install ChromeOS on a computer
Bu there is a Chrome OS distro for linux
I certainly wouldn't recommend chromeOS for anything but chromebooks
Ok i was wrong there is only one chrome OS, but is t bad though ?
It's not bad, but you don't want it on your computer
just as you wouldn't want Android on your computer
I doubt you can even install it, but you shouldn't regardless
Is Zorin OS bad too ?
what do you want from a linux distro?
if you just want to use linux, some derivative of ubuntu will likely be the best choice
And btw why did you say that solos is bad ? I forgot
And there is a Debian distro ? Is that good
?
Solus is weird... it's like "kind of" rolling release
Debian is excellent, though I would suggest some variant ubuntu, which build on debian and make it nicer for desktop usage with better defaults and a ton of resources
honestly, I can't tell what you're looking for
It's weird that you even thought of using ChromeOS
No just searched for distros and i found cheome os
that's weird. but you really should stop searching, honesstly
you're getting into really weird distribution territory
And i thought okay google made this so there is no problem why i would not install this
cough cough Manjaro cough cough
Well, whatever research you're doing, it's not enough D:
If you're new to Linux, use something like Ubuntu.
rolling releases aren't the greatest choice if you don't know what you are doing
You're calling Manjaro a weird distribution, yes? If so, I totally agree
You say weird, I say the least amount of trouble I've ever had with a Linux Distro
just stick to windows smh
/s
Guess it depends, for a lot of people... Manjaro has probably been an entire mess
windows is really nice these days tbh
Probably
IKR
The same could be said for any other distro, though
I mean... Arch has managed to be much better for me than Manjaro
dare I bring up the Manjaro controversies site again D:
This but no /s =P
with docker, you can just run linux software near natively
wsl is also an option
Only big downside is having to snag a bunch of build tools that are fairly hefty
On Arch, I think they are
No no, I'm saying for Windows
I mean WSL
i didn't even want WSL but docker forced me to get it anyway ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
Oh gotcha
I think the group on Arch is fairly big
Grabbing build tools one time vs worrying about managing upgrades and generally not have a lot of software be built for your platform.... I'll take the build tool retrieval
Like I said, only real downside
build-essential on Ubuntu is fine, isn't it?
Don't remember it being big or anything
I'm more saying the microsoft build tools for VS
oh. yes... those are HUGE
They're pretty essential
Meh, I think people overestimate the "complexity" of Linux, though
And I think people underestimate the convenience of Windows
Yep. Just like anything else, use what works best for you
Also, morning Hemlock~
Yo
ikr
a friend did have majaro break multiple times
but i am not the one to say since its the only one i have used 
Eivl did when he installed his new graphics card
However the solution was literally to run pacman and update
I thought you used arch too?
Eivl also practically runs a supercomputer though
nah im too noob to install arch
Manjaro had a lot of broken things for me, but I didn't know they were necessarily broken
In fairness it has only improved
so what about those old screenshots from december? that wasn't arch?
It previously was a lot more shoddy
a lot of RAM on his pc?
Like my mic didn't work on Manjaro, someone told me this really weird thing that some channels don't work together or something
bruh.
that I would either have only output or only input
He has an absolutely insane amount of RAM, his graphics cards are next level, and everything about this build is "I don't fuck around" level
I switch to Xubuntu and right away, my mic works
damn.
also I can't remember what but my bluetooth was buggy
Also no one is in the office today and it is so pleasant
and my wifi was buggy
For some reason when I ran Ubuntu, it'd always break about a month after for no reason
also my sound didn't work ootb, I had to do some really weird configuration to get it to work
Sounds nice.
Were you on LTS?
Yep
I probably did something to screw it up
But it did leave a bit of a bad taste in my mouth
I used to speak highly of Manjaro, but it was my first and only distro at the time
basically I didn't realize what exactly was wrong with it until I switched away
like even with... Minecraft... I noticed a huge FPS boost... 600 on Manjaro, 2.5k on Xubuntu
same settings and everything
No, but it's enough to have my jaw drop
naturally
on Manjaro? XFCE
I switched to Xubuntu because by then I was already used to XFCE
I love me some XFCE
Rip the Manjaro themes and bam... basically Manjaro
bruh what
i barely get 60
lol
but when I switched from Manjaro to Xubuntu, everything was so much better for me
Does make me wonder if it was a driver lag behind and if Arch would have had the same power hit
I'm using Arch currently, I'm not sure what it is but I still only get 600 FPS
Likely something with the Arch specific drivers then
I'm not sure if that can be blamed specifically on Manjaro
Perhaps, I'm willing to bet it's something related to the stinky Optimus
Probable
Of course, but still a reason to not use Arch or a derivative... despite me still using Arch
I should say that my Manjaro rig at home is an oldish HP workstation laptop
That's a fair point, absolutely
There's no denying that it works until it doesn't
Not to mention the lack of support compared to Debian based
Like... it's kind of inevitable
I've only seen issues happen when people modify their hardware
Or rather, that's when it happens most
Maybe, but most of my own problems occured ootb
The only huge issue I've had with it was when I didn't use the thing for over a month, and came back to a shit ton of expired certs. THAT was a nightmare
oh yeah, that's on the controversies page
Lmao i open the channel and this is what I saw and I uh am thinking uh
Anonymously-posted copy of another
Introduction
Manjaro is a Linux distribution based on the Arch Linux distribution. It focuses on accessibility, friendliness and stability.
However, there has been several major controversies regarding Manjaro over the years. This gist is aimed to address all kn...
maybe those issues were too long ago to actually match up... but yeah
The kernel updates aren't really as big of a deal as they make it out to be
You can easily stick to a LTS one and never worry about it
Meh, I don't like how Manjaro's marketed towards beginners, though
Managing Manjaro is honestly probably harder than managing Arch
I'll have to run Arch to see how it compares
Never got around to it. Tried it a few years back and just got fed up with trying
They've got a guided installer recently
That's a gamechanger
or so I've heard plenty of times
this one?