#ot1-perplexing-regexing
1 messages · Page 107 of 1
This is a pretty neat example for why formal logic doesn't work for real world cases
it does though
those examples formalized are
P -> Q
~Q
∴ ~P
```which is a perfectly valid deduction
the problem with them is that the premise `P -> Q` isn't true in those cases
an example of a valid ad absurdum argument applied to the real world
If it had been raining a minute ago the ground would be wet.
The ground is not wet.
∴ It wasn't raining a minute ago.
constructivists dni
What does this mean
Constructivism is a branch of thought in mathematics that doesn't respect proofs by contradiction
aka intuitionists reject the law of the excluded middle
What about the first example? Is that not a fallacious argument?
so things can be neither true nor false, which means modus tollens doesnt work
aaah, okay
it's valid but unsound
If rocks had no weight, they would float.
Rocks do not float.
∴ Rocks have weight.
```the first premise is false because there could be other explanations for why the rocks do not float, i.e. the antecedent could be true and the consequent false
Yeah, reduction ad absurdum is in no way a fallacy
Assuming it's correctly applied, it's a totally valid argument. Proof by contradiction
What about this argument:
“Society must have laws, otherwise there would be chaos.”
There can still be chaos in a society even if laws are implemented in the society
to elaborate a little further, proofs by contradiction are often used as existence proofs, i.e. "if something like X didn't exist, that would lead to a contradiction, therefore something like X exists"
an alternate form of existence proof is "Here one of those things right here: X, therefore X exists"
this is called a constructive proof bc you actually constructed an X, which is also usually more helpful because now you have an X to work with
sometimes we only know a nonconstructive proof, aka we know an X exists but we have no known examples of such a thing
constructivists are called that bc they reject the first form of proof completely
"no laws -> chaos"
"laws & chaos"
these statements are not contradictory, i think you've made another converse error
bro affirmed the consequent
How long have you been studying logic?
bro is experienced
Nice
are you a philosophical doctor
no
why not
some combination of a) I couldn't decide which direction to go b) everyone who does that is always saying not to do it c) academia is a dumpster fire
real
I agree on c). Which is why I resented electives
i think the best advice is, if you don't feel like you need to research some specific topic, you should not start a phd
and i didnt
undergrad isn't really academia

yeah. that's the advice I got. "if you don't 'must have it'" then don't
we'll see after an ms though, lol
What are your thoughts on this philosophical argument “Humans are designed to procreate. If you do not procreate or plans to procreate in the future, you are not living life they way you were meant to be.” ?
i'd reject the first premise
my mom was working as a post doc for less than I made at Chipotle 😩😩😩😩. really filters out a lot of people
Some of my philosophical beliefs falls under existentialism. I want to determine the way I want to live my life. Which is why I oppose the philosophy of natalism.
where do you cut the first premise?
"humans were designed to procreate"?
what's the logic here though?
It's a philosophical argument, I don't think logic is particularly important here
logic is a pretty important part of philosophy
you have to at least have some kind of reasoning, no? if you're just saying this without anything to back it up:
Humans are designed to procreate. If you do not procreate or plans to procreate in the future, you are not living life they way you were meant to be.
then I can just as easily say:
Humans are not designed to procreate. If you do procreate or plan to procreate in the future, you are not living life they way you were meant to be.
and both'd be equally valid
There are too many people in the world anyway. We don't need more
Plus, you're bringing someone into the world and they're pretty much guaranteed to suffer. The world is awful. Life is awful. That's my take
pretty boring take on life
I'm almost 3 decades in and it's been pretty accurate so far
you definitely could, but I didn't think they wanted a pure logical reasoning - I may be wrong
well, you're assuming that whoever's born thinks they're overall suffering
but they're not born yet so you can't know for sure if they think they're suffering or not
my experience has been the complete opposite, but sure
and I'm a lot younger, so take that as you will
skill issue tbh
Yeah it was a skill issue on my parent's part
From a common natalist’s worldview is human flourishing. Human flourishing from a typical natalist’s point of view is to promote human life which includes procreation for the continuous of humanity. If there’s no procreation, then there’s no human flourishing.
And a skill issue on genetics as well
But hey at least I don't have to live to be 80+. Silver lining and all that
you'll get problems if you have a philosophical belief that's both unprovable and very subjective
unprovable, like Humans are designed; subjective maybe
for sure
how is human flourishing defined? it sure is not unchecked reproduction
awtching youtube eating ramen
this is pretty sensitive, couple wrong steps and you end up arguing for eugenics and you sure dont want that
How else would humanity flourish if nobody wants children?
true
should every family be perpetually pregnant then?
more kids = more flourishing
So this is pretty much the gist of a Natalist’s worldview
A typical one that is
but the options you present are
- nobody wants to have children
- everyone should want to have children
and you left out something in the middle, like "some want to have children"
and you can see how it doesnt hold up to reality
I hear this kind of thing a lot, unfortunately with my declining health it's guaranteed a downhill unless something magical happens and I can suddenly afford good insurance and copays. But I gave up on that wishful thinking a long time ago
thank you for TED talking
average doomer
thank you. be sure to check out my next talk
Live the life I have and you would be too
why not change
I'd assume its probably easier said than done for them, you have no idea what's going on in their life
sure, giving up is easy
What a great idea. How do you suppose I change this arthritis? Or my heart issues? Lemme just change the asthma away. I'll just change my bank account to have a few extra zeros so I can afford medical care. Great idea. I'll just change.
If I gave up I wouldn't be talking in discord right now
whatever, tbh
🤨
Don't you fucking dare whatever me after that, you're the one trying to call me out for shit you have no clue about
Every day I get up and I work my ass off despite being fucking miserable. I push myself to the limit, I work hard at my day job to do better than everyone Else so I can get a raise that's pennies on the dollar.
I come home and I do freelance with to try and build a portfolio to hopefully one day get a job that IS actually worth it, where maybe I CAN improve my quality of life
And I recently spend so many extra hours and days effectively rebuilding a quarter of a house so I'm not homeless (again) when the month ends. And I've been doing most of that work by myself.
If I gave up I wouldn't be doing any of that
But that doesn't mean I can't see the world for what it is
what the hell is this paragraph
A shitty machine of misery that keeps the wealthy rich and everyone else in the dirt
huh
Most reasonable take I've heard in a long time
Do you share Anti-Natalist philosophical views?
worth noting that not being a natalist is not the same thing as being an anti-natalist
This is why I was asking
haven't birth rates been declining in the West?
🤔
don't worry Macron's got it
government mandated baby making kits
hasn't Japan also been doing that
I think essentially for the reasons that were previously stated. it is just really expensive to have children

a war on the continent isnt helping
It’s tough
There’s misery going on in my life as well but it’s not from work
Life isn’t easy
its not that hard
and as much as I like to agree with that @grave cove , even the ultra rich have their own set of worries and problems
it's hard, just in a different way from our ancestors
we enjoy privileges other people couldnt even dream of
there's no just easy ticket
yeah, i think saying everyone has their own set of problems is a good generalization
That doesn't mean that our pain and suffering isn't real, though.
Everyone's struggles are valid.
idk, there's a lot of people who think they struggle
That's one thing it's always really pissed me off when someone says "there are so many people who have it worse off than you" like yeah, that sucks for them too, but goddamnit I still can barely walk some days, that counts too.
mathematically true
It's relative. It's like pain
If the worst pain you ever felt in your life was a bee sting
it's going to be really hard to imagine worse pain than that
you might even think there is no worse pain, it couldn't possibly get worse than that
thats why its important to keep in mind that it could be a lot worse and that there's people out there right now that are living it
unitl you experience say, breaking a bone.
but that doesn't marginalize your experience of the pain.
Marginalizing someone's experience because "other people have it worse" is a sign of extremely low emotional intelligence
i didnt say anything like that
And I'd wager a lack of empathy as well, but the two generally go hand in hand.
Yep. That’s an appeal to emotion fallacy
I work with an african guy, he has a similar thing going on.
i dont think you'd agree that some rich kid not getting their way is them "struggling" even tho it feels like that to them
Though he's been entirely disillusioned by the US and is moving back to Africa, so you know, more power to him, he knows exactly what he wants.
Appeal to emotion logical fallacy
we're not arguing about anything here keezy
bro thats not a fallacy thats a rhetorical device
its all a debate
nuh uh
we should get aboo in here
not even in the same realm. My point is things like family struggles, etc. Rich people lose people who are close to them, rich people have to deal with financial stress too - not from being unable to apy for things, but taxes and property ownership, etc etc, it's a lot to deal with. Then you have the branch of generally, people are hired to handle these things, then you're managing people. Sure, it's a more comfortable life in most ways, bujt they still have stress, and they can still experience hardships
Your rebuttal was:
thats why its important to keep in mind that it could be a lot worse and that there's people out there right now that are living it
That doesn’t discredit their premise that their life is miserable
best argument
nuh uh
i didnt say that their life isnt miserable
Why use an emotional counterpoint as a response then?
dont you think its healthier to keep a positive outlook on life than a sad pessimistic one?
it can be a good argumentative device
Outlook is bad
I think it's healthist to keep an entirely realist outlook
real
life is suffering is not realistic
The universe doesn't care about you
source?
a positive hotmail
its just sad
There is no greater power
Another counterpoint totally dismissing their premise
deep
do you agree that life is miserable then?
me
It’s manipulative actually
everything is manipulative
is it false?
you're manipulative
the whole point of making an argument is to convince someone
ergo, we should be eating 6 pizzas per hour
nuh uh
infinite happiness glitch
holy shit
he's inside our brain ????
rent free
less
Even if this was preposition was true, that doesn’t justify it being an acceptable counterargument to use emotion to substantiate your point
yikes
its not emotional, its a hard fact
Appealing to emotion? You’re not properly counter arguing their claim that their life is miserable
what does "properly counter arguing" even imply? is there an official organization that has a handbook on arguing?
the sentence "we enjoy privileges other people couldnt even dream of" is just fact
there's kids experiencing war, famine, disease
separate from the argument happening right now, can you refute this?
in debate comps there are some baseline rules but there are so many ways to argue a point
Attacking their actual argument
Attacking their premise
yeah by name dropping fallacies
keezy can you refute this, or are you saying youre denying reality
yes
is it the MoyenChat Handbook of Arguing, 3rd Edition?
that's outdated
How does this fact counter-argue their claim that their life is miserable?
it was one statement i made that you picked, its not a counter argument
everything is an argument though
So why respond with that then?
im not even arguing against them lol, first of all how would i know theyre telling the truth to begin with
they could just be making it all up
yeah verify they do find life miserable
the point is that having a positive outlook on life is healthier
You can’t prove that though
and "life is misery" is not a positive outlook
this is discord you cant prove anything
which is why they said 'could'
can you prove it?
That’s not falsifiable
you cant prove it right either
im not attempting to disprove someone's experience, its just advice
and its pretty common advice
they're saying it could be a joke is saying they can't prove it's true anyway
do you agree with the advice keezy
we can argue about whether the advice is good or not
Outlook? They didn’t say it was his outlook. Their claim was that their life is miserable
is that not someone's outlook on life
lmao no
no way 😭
.wa short outlook synonym
Synonyms of outlook are mentality, mind-set, mindset, nature, expectation, prospect, and lookout
I was summoned into the shitting on Microsoft convention but it was actually just a normal conversation
not quite normal
Microsoft SUCKS ong
microsoft is fine, keep your pants on
shitting on MS counts as a normal conversation
coping
||I don't need that off to shit ||

Not necessarily: It's true if you assume that you can quantify "goodness of one's life" so that you have a total order on humans, but that's quite debatable. If you relax it to a partial order, which seems more reasonable (still has its issues imo), that doesn't imply there necessarily is a "best life" (greatest element) or "worst life" (least element). Since there are a finite number of humans, we can conclude there is at least one minimal/maximal element, which would mean a human where no other human has a better/worse life than them, but that doesn't automatically make them the person with the best/worst life because there could be other humans who they can't be compared with.
I agree with you on the unfalsifiable thing but uhhhh bit sure what to say about the other stuff 
WE GET IT
YOU HAVE GPT 4
i actually understand what stickie is talking about for once
ordering is like the last unit we did in class
stickie is the kind of person that considers utilitarianism unrealistic because utility functions are too hard :p
I am reminded of this meme
when I become president I will obligate every citizen to be on meth 24/7, vote for me
I will end poverty if you vote for me
just elect me
and I'll eliminate every last poor person
no more poverty
are you gonna spend tax payer money
no
based
I'll do it my self
Just make poverty illegal, easy fix
this would be a philosophical issue, not a mathematical one: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience_machine
The experience machine or pleasure machine is a thought experiment put forward by philosopher Robert Nozick in his 1974 book Anarchy, State, and Utopia. It is an attempt to refute ethical hedonism by imagining a choice between everyday reality and an apparently preferable simulated reality.
A primary thesis of hedonism is that "pleasure is the...
discrete mathpilled
doesn't actually follow because happiness is a human concept and there's no guarantee whatsoever that it's coherent and can be formalized.
(but i'm being pedantic, i actually agree.)
even if you're working within the realm of science, there are far better indicators to quantify how good a life is that would fit closer to what someone subjectively feels
i'm a mathematician
you need to prove that it exists to convince me
Where do you fall on the spectrum of constructivists vs ... not that?
the existence of a theoretical way to order how good people's lives are is a different concept to a practical way to order them for some purpose
not me reading a list of ontological arguments for the existence of god and turning each into an argument trying to conving stickie that happiness exists
if you're trying to do it to for example to figure out how much to give to certain people, then sure, there are ways to give an ordering that most people agree with
well, to know how to "measure" it you really have to define what it is
I drive to buy lunch and this is how this chat transitioned into a different topic lol
definitions are useful insofar as they help you solve some problem, and i've already shown how the dopamine approach is flawed in capturing what most people believe "goodness" of a life is
the main issue here is that "goodness" is subjective, and so we don't have a universal definition, and we don't know if a universal definition could exist
and we don't know if a universal definition could exist
it better, because if not, humanity is fucked and will never ever get along
you've defined it for your own perspective; that doesn't make it a universal definition of "goodness"
mb
real
based?
Whose head
mine
i agree that for a given definition, there may or may not exist some way to order everyone properly
what my point is is that there isn't necessarily a "correct" definition, and maybe that the notion of "correct" is even flawed itself: if there was a definition everyone who ever existed agreed upon as the right definition, does that make it the "correct" definition?
math and philosophy are very close
meth majors
those have a lot of dopamine
I'm aware that philo majors do pro positional logic
actually now that u mention it, my obsidian notes r usually for math and programming, but have philosophy in them because of how often they connect
the usual response to a yes/no like that is a theoretical situation where the condition holds, but seems absurd to us, and so makes us question our definitions
For example, what if everyone suddenly agrees that money is the most important thing in the world, and how good one's life is is directly proportional to how rich they are. Does that automatically make money the correct quantification of happiness?
s3. You don't pay for the storage. Just the upload/download of the data. Not exactly what you're asking for.
wait, fr?

Ah, I'm wrong.
You do pay for the storage there too. It's just trivial compared to the cost of access.
First 50 TB / Month $0.023 per GB
there's a pretty cheap s3 alternative that I forget the name of.. it doesn't charge for moving data
If you find it, let me know. Moving of data is usually how these things make their money.
they have a flat fee per amount of data
but iirc there are restrictions, it's more for backups
wasabi @thick osprey
backblaze?
that's... not going to happen
that's just not going to happen 
wasabi
this might sound rude, but that doesn't sound like prioritizing the right thing
flash drive 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
big one
very fast, works in shit connections
no running cost
no terms of service that email me telling me i uploaded CoPyRiGhTeD contents to my drive
At the least, you're looking for the golden goose. 10 TB is not insignificant, much less free. ((I say looking at the 4 TB portable drive next to me))
golly, storage is weird.
depending on when you got it, that'd be like 100 for 4tb hard drive
tbh i think the actual quick storage you will need is probably rly small, just a few gigs
the big bulk is usually just photos that you look at once a year, those can go on phys media imo
looks like Discord is doing free nitro trials again
FOMO bait
prepare for discord.gift URLs that seem like spam
this is like giving vapes to kids
I love free trials of Nitro. I love to wave at them as they just sit and expire.
have u ever used a flash drive
you should perhaps look into saving some money
what do you need 10TB of storage for?
you just need to throw a few electrons at it to prevent data rot
if you only have $1.65 to your name do you really need a nicety like shared storage
how do you have 10TB of personal files?
question still stands
why do you need to share 8 TB of data across all devices?
what are you storing that you are at the terabyte scale? Just tons of photos?
you use all of those regularly?
Imagine writing a Python program that transfers terabytes of data across 4 devices in automation
and you need to access the video game worlds on every one of these devices regularly?
I mean, I have roughly 16 TB of total data but most of it is all offline archive storage. Everything I need for any computer fits rather spaciously in 256 GB. Got to prioritize what needs access and what doesn't.
what are you doing that data loss is such a common case that you reload backups on a regular basis?
And it sorts file names into different folders.
me when black ops 6 is 309 GB
I see, so you work across four devices and somehow have 8TB of WIP game worlds
Everything I need....

time to make a NAS
I have so many questions
also I accidentally wrote a backup script that spit out 160GB of Minecraft backups. it was running every second
I have weekly backups of my minecraft world over the last 10 years. It takes up less than 1 TB. I can't imagine what you are trying to tote around. Not to mention the time you'd spend just access that level of info repeatedly!
NAS is short for network attached storage
He didn’t specify
use context clues
I mean, if Roman is doing TNT stuff or slimeblock machines, I could see it.
you copy worlds all the time when doing that nonsense
Nope. You gotta specify
youre in a damn programming server man
this isn't a debate or argument. you weren't even the person I was talking to
Just like I had to specify for @timid latch . You gotta specify for me
you think they meant national academy of sciences??
I wonder if there's some fancy on-drive compression you could run
I actually don't have to at all
The context
surely you have like 95% duplicate data
NAS would be a great option though you'd need to build it. I don't want to imagine trying to copy terabytes of data over a wireless connection frequently though.
backups are usually zipped already right? though you could zip those, yeah
zip the zips
No I thought they meant this NAS
ZIPs do nothing unless the data is not already zipped
what nas
I assume the worlds are uncompressed
will even increase the size if its already zipped
I would suggest setting up ventoy for those
Netowrk Attached Storage
grab a computer, slap drives in, use nextcloud
boom, you have your own shared cloud storage (-ish)
As mentioned more than several times, Network Attached Storage.
how many fit the context
whats next cloud, i look it up and it says some corporate shit

what do people actually do with it?
Aah, no worries.
.wiki NextCloud
dropbox but you selfhost it
Nextcloud
Nextcloud is a suite of client-server software for creating and using file hosting services. Nextcloud provides functionality similar to Dropbox, Office
Collabora Online
ownCloud and Nextcloud self-hosting cloud server technologies. Vaughan-Nichols, Steven (2020-06-04). "NextCloud gets bigger and better with Nextcloud Hub
How many fit the context of what an alien is when I mentioned extraterrestrial life outside of our planet?
not relevant
ohhhhhhhhhh, so like a more general immich
@glossy niche, the first one
icc, ty 
some of these open source things can end up with homepages more corpo than actual corporate products
bitwarden
but generally speaking, you will need more than 2 dollars for 10tb
a lot more
at least
Several more
ye, step one is going to be making more money
maybe like 200
STEAL STEAL STEAL
depends, usually either a job, or for smaller things using your local connections (if you have any) to freelance.
*gasp*
or just asking parents
if you cant get a job, spend less money, yknow, cook instead of order, walk instead of drive, etc
not applicable for everyone
I don’t know the name of the logical fallacy but I have heard this claim throughout my life:
Mothers are always right
By that logic, if a mother say to her son that murder is acceptable, then she’s right
Also, getting advice from a parent is no different than getting advice from a stranger
||appeal to authority||
Are you familiar with the concept of hyperbole?
The advice itself doesn’t hold weight just because they are your parent
Maybe, if that stranger was with you for 90% of your life up to like 18 years old

I don't know. If I spoke with my parents I'd listen to their advice over the advice of a stranger.
And why is that?
They know you more and can offer more personalised advice
My parents do have much more context over who I am as a person, my wants, my strengths, my weaknesses, my personal situation than a random stranger
Familiarity of the context.
clearly nepotism, clearly
I am not talking about personalized advice. I am just talking about advice
||argument by intimidation||
? what distinction are you trying to make?
... how is that different?
most advice needs some form of personalization
Advice about life choices
How is that different from personalized advice...?
"buy index funds" vs specific investment advice, e.g.
Lol
does it need a name to exist? just call it argumentum ad yourmom
that's advice that requires tons of personalization 
Appeal to motherly insight
momsaidso fallacy
Because life advice is more universal. Personalized advice is only applicable to the person who receives that advice
Life advice is not more universal... it's very much dependent on the person and their current situation..................
life advice is not universal
Cleaning your room is an example of life advice. That can be applicable to everyone
Cleaning it everyday
I'd argue that the only useful advice is one that is personalized or has context that makes it useful to consider.
That is a chore, not advice.
maybe yours isn't
There’s actually a psychological component in cleaning your room everyday
you should do correct things and not wrong ones. If you think you can make a mistake, don't do so.
subscribe to my substack for more life advice
Blessed advice
How nice for it. It's still a chore.
Is asking about career choices not life advice? What you are even defining as life advice
ah yes, my fav piece of jordan peterson advice, WIPE YOUR ASS
or whatever it is he said
oh right clean your room
That doesn’t discredit my claim that it’s a psychological component. Having a positive psychological outcome is great for a living a better life
answering just "Advice about life choices" as a clarifying example of not personalized advice suggests all life choice advice is non-personalized
not "there exists life advice that is not personalized"
Bro did you not just say i discredit someones experiences for saying this exact thing
Are we still talking about what the difference between advice and personalized advice is? Because it doesn't feel like it to me.
eeeey, I get in-seat power for my next flight let's goooo
It's about 50/50 if only the front half gets power in-seats for the flights I've been on
wack
mhm, place to plug in your devices during the flight
You guys get those for domestic flights?
just fly not economy
Wtf
Life advice is advice that is applicable to everyone. Personalized advice is advice to the person who receives it. That’s the difference.
But you could argue that the advice you receive can be both life and personalized advice
you don't?
bro forgor that domestic flights can last multiple hours here
Idk, never been on a domestic flight
Life advice is advice that is applicable to everyone
for what definition of life advice?
Unfortunately my company's airfare policy typically ends up in my taking layovers, so I do a bunch of shorter flights. On the shorter flights it's a toss-up if the entire plane gets in-seat power or not
why are you surprised then lol
This is what i get for flying budget air
"should I pursue path X in life" is very much life advice, no?
All the flights i've been on have been international
I assumed theyre fancier
allegedly
Truly europoor
Is the UK even big enough to have domestic flights?
post-brexit UK
Theres a couple i think
shots fired
To manchester, glasgow probably
So we weren't. Cool. All set on that. I'd still take both your styles of advice from my parents (given the option) over a stranger.
Time for a hike. See y'all
aren't there trains from the isle of man to scotland's northern tip?
LOOK, people in the UK say that a 4 hour drive is long and cross-country. That feels like no-domestic flights to me
something something established trust over time
average American commute
one way
America is large for no reason tbh
Americans are just crazy to put up with such long drives
manifest destiny moment
This is why you dont have high speed rail
They had to fit Texas in it.
real
for no reason, I said
sprawling suburbs are great y'all
That’s the distinction that I am explaining in regards to my claim that receiving advice from your parent is no different than receiving advice from a stranger
Nah, we don't have high speed rail because of the automotive industry 😩
I dont think its that long but yea, there are sleeper trains
Super cool but also super spenny
spenny
You’re basically biased if you favour your parent’s advice over a stranger.
You haven't defined life advice in a way that makes any amount of sense yet
Yes.
You're just stating things with absolutely nothing backing it up, despite multiple questions
and Amtrak is trying to be expensive and travel focused now
no, because you have had prior interactions and established trust over time
Bias is why I favour my parents' advice
America moment
that's not some blind bias
lmao I know a dude who wanted to take the metro to New York, it would have costed like 200$ apparently
All about prior probabilities
if you do the math the price is about equivalent depending on tolls you take and gas actually
oh, hmm
... because I have done that math
lmfao
train >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cars 👎🏼
I defined it in the context of my argument
but also: other people on the train 🤮
Not really, but sure.
at least it's not on a plane
counter-point: wifi and you get to zone out the entire time with noise cancelling headphones
Also, you get to go 300 km/h without having to "check in" or have your baggage checked
I have heard things about NY metros
oh yeah, if you have to drive, train def better. if you have someone else, pz ez
and no TSA
cause fuuuuck airport security
real
It’s so easy to go in the wrong direction in life if your parent gives you the wrong advice. Blindly listening just because they are your parents. Evaluate the advice objectively
TRAINS I FUCKING LOVE TRAINS
... anyway back to talking about trains
big mechanical worm that takes me places
it's a demon
What's y'all's favourite trains?
all of them
Tesla 😌
on time ones :)
ew
counterpoint: teslas make muskrat richer
One of my work trips I was forced to take a Tesla and I have never hated a car more in my existance
Everything about it was terrible
I have a picture somewhere of the parking lot outside this function I went to, it was all Teslas
Things I didn't think could be terrible were astoundingly terrible
you should train-hike switzerland
it costs 144 monthly to go to work (by train) 😭😭. which is actually not bad if you factor in parking. the worst part is that regional trail has absolutely terrible time mostly. not during rush hour = train every hour
Oh god yeah, I had to suffer regional rail saturday night and good lord they need more frequent train times
Did any of them catch on fire by itself?
we drive a plug in hybrid, which is honestly kind of great
I really, really want to. After college I did a semi-train hike through parts of germany/czech republic/austria and I adored it
since any sort of daily commute for like grocery and stuff ends up being fully electric
Nah, that's DC metro. Not the city where I live in now
I thought they meant the Teslas
why do you drive a plug? in hybrid, even
my commute for grocery shopping is walking across the road 😌
don't diss my plug man
must be nice
Based walkable city enjoyer
lol are teslas known for being on fire? I thought they were known for constantly falling apart and running people over on autopilot
it is a 30 minute walk to the nearest grocery store
they've started catching on fire
Mine is 5min and i get to cross 2 bridges
oh, a Tesla door closed on my fingers once
moving to the heart of a walkable city has boosted my mental and overall life quality like nothing else
there's no sensors apparently
why not both?
it's so bullshit
Lol look what happened. The previous topic got completely hijacked before it reached to a conclusion. This is why equal level ranks in a table is preferable for me
all three
The vehicle I go grocery shopping with is the ultimate freedom vehicle. No government registration, I can park anywhere, no need to go to gas stations
It got hijacked because people wanted to talk about a new topic
rank had nothing to do with it 👍
we should all join back on an alt
I've done a conversation "hijack" like this on my alt without my roles, it has nothing to do with my fancy color
Mark 1 leg(s)
oh hai mark
Actually a bike, but yeah, walking works too if I don't need too much
🤓☝️ it's because of your authoritative tone backed by the confidence you could switch back and moderate
That’s you with your authority status to re-transition to the next topic
"oh, shiny conversation topic"
oh but you need a lock and the bike stand things
We might have to move further out of the city and it will kill all the joy i've ever had accumulated in my life if it happens
why do you need a bike stand?
loool, like I said. I've done this before on my alt. It has nothing to do with my roles
sobbing and crying because you can't debate forever
Further outside of london is goddamn suburbs
something to lock it to
can someone please help me with something? im tryna do this job sim and the first step is to paste "npx create-react-app@3.4.1 my-app --scripts-version=@skyscanner/backpack-react-scripts --template @skyscanner/backpack --use-npm"
into the terminal
but what terminal? there was no bg info
I would try to avoid it all costs tbh
British suburbs 🤯
lock it to random places
A lock yes, but that takes 3 seconds. Bike stands in that sense are everywhere here.
pub I kind of get what you mean about suits now
I could feasibly bike to work
Mike Ross is an ungrateful piece of shit
Unfortunately its better financially and the gf thinks she'd be closer to the woods
he's had like zero character development
I've got pressure from all sides
I am stealing this
the… woods?
Donna >>>>>>>>
Donna carries the show
are you dating a druid?
..... I just did the reverse where I did suburbs -> city. I cannot overstate how much my day-to-day is simply ✨ better ✨
I recently discovered my town has priority bike routes. They go in a straight line for many kilometers and you have priority everywhere, no traffic lights etc.
A dryad yes
countryside >>>>
that's amazing
:O
ah right
the US could never
dryads druids
We did that too, we used to live in suburb outside of cambridge
out of a city is not necessarily in a suburb
the three million ton trucks could never
there are benefits to living in and out of a city, suburbs though are a lifeless blight
if you line the trucks up in a single line, you could make a bike lane on top of them
I feel that in my fucking boooones. But to be fair that situation did get me super involved in PyDis as a coping mechanism
I joined pydis during the pandemic lol
same
same
It got me to drop to underweight status lol
I would argue city >> countryside >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suburbs
same
congrats, or sorry that happened
suburbs > countryside
absolutely not. wrong.
average bad aboo take
city life isn't for me anymore, need the peace and quiet & field views out my window
explain 😩
I lied nvm
holy smokes I joined in 2019? thats so weird
the suburbs are something
cities good tbh
suburbs are the worst of both worlds. Everything still requires a car, you still have neighbors closeby and no real privacy and seclusion.
I'm team "city but not in the immediate center, but with excellent public transit so it doesn't matter"
joined before I did lol
In the suburbs theres just houses aboo
you need the fields for your bunnies, don't lie
well yeah, and the occasional Walmart
You also joined in 2019
It was a half hour walk to the nearest store
That's what the garden is for
2020
how're they doing btw?
It was 45' on a bus to the city centre
the thing about the suburbs is that you can generally get to a more urban area without an unholy amount of driving
huh it shows me jayy joined in 2022
OH! Chris! Do you have your bunnies really long dandelion stems to chew on?
huh what
it was because I kept leaving and rejoining lol
I saw a video of a bunny going ham on one and it was so fucking cute
guess I must have accidentaly left or something
timezones, man
yeah ! and apple tree branches
pls record video next time and send to me, thx
maybe you got aboo'd. or rem'd. or whatever it's called now
banks'd
thuri'd
(edited)
coward!
plz no
rem(abo)oved
wabbit videos
true true, you make a very good point
everyone ping
everyone ghost ping
ping
urgh, speaking of I really need to finish this code jam qualifier......
at everyone bnuyy
leaked
@everyοne observe these buns!
mfw chris's rabbits break discord's backend
An attempt shall be made
reasonably sure that any interaction with discord breaks discord's backend
nahhh
Well that was a fast walk. Put my shoe on and the soul tore clean off the heel.
discords backend is unironically goated ngl
its the frontend thats
lets say questionable
if this ain't a typo, uhhhhh
dang, not the soul
sole, soul, saul.
better call sole
good time for that to happen, relative to the middle of a walk
do you actually pronounce those three the same?
True! That would really have been unplesant. It's wet out too.
sole and soul, yes. saul, no.
soul and sole, sure, but saul?
saul is like soll
better call sol
saw l
My fingers do, apparently.
saul is like stall without the t
no 🍵 ?
how do u guys say gauss
gaw ss
gaw-ss
slow
or gow-ss, depends on context
the brain says ga-oos but the heart says goss 😔
If I'm talking about the person, then [ɡaʊs]
Let stall have some tea!
look at you IPA'ing
ipa, who do you think you are? stel?
great idea!
I still think the schwa is fake and should be deleted
whats the else on that if
people who cant pronounce gif: "joss"
I did study the same field, so sort of
admin imposter! admin imposter! moddddds!
Hmmm... Converse or New Balance for replacements? 
where?!
l3viathan. destroy them, chris!
Chris is the impostor
!ban l3viathan
I think [gɒs] then
your a is upside down
idk what that means
shame

skill issue
tbf, pot calling the kettle black
like "call" except with a g and an s
Yes, but as a diphtong
correctly
get stel'd: the dude's name is ɡaʊs
we should talk about oyclid and yuler
also dirichlet
....yuler?
oil er
mhm
we should add this to the superstar list
at least you didn't say eww ler
hardly know her
I was about to say
it's yuler and I'm tired of calling him a hockey team
||oil her? I hardly know her||
also I've heard people say "da broccoli"

lmao

de broglie
wtf
lol
well i guessed broglie wrong. turns out it's closer to "de broi"
same
you took a silent L
blasted french with their stealth consonants
"French aristocrat and physicist"
i had to say the word "lipschitz" irl today
it's pronounced like you think it is
yeah
…is it pronounced like dipshit?
lip shits
sounds like a really bad medical condition
oh
"miserere" is the official term I think
continuous condition
I'm editing this 7.8k test file and it's making me sad
7.8k loc or tests
I'm sure it could be condensed to like 1/8 of that if only people made the appropriate helpers or fixtures
oh no
You're giving me flashbacks..
75 lines of includes 🙃
My favorite game is deleting a test, running coverage, and seeing no change. 
actual java moment
the impl file has 107 lines of includes
that doesn't mean it's not useful though 🤔
java imports
Unofficial rule I try to adhere to: if a test doesn't improve coverage, it gets deleted
this is glorious C++
C++ moment
Right. It's the three way question now:
- Did it do nothing
- Did it do something
- Was it just acting like one of the above
sure the real favorite would be two where deleting exactly one (either one) of them changes nothing?
what if you need to test two things about the same bit of code 
idk ive never written a test in my life
I might write a single test then :P
at least isn't not this other 25k test file I saw
D:
dropout regularize
why not?
i never write incorrect code
based
doubt
sounds like skill issue if you ask me
Do your coworkers also all write pristine code only?
See, I'm the polar opposite. I get lost in test side-tracks. "Is this really thread safe? Let's test it!" ((mind you the actual goal had nothing to do with the database at all, its there for something to do work in the background))
https://github.com/Preocts/flask_playground/blob/main/tests/pizzastore_test.py#L90-L133
he has no coworkers
erm, what the sigma
me fixing flaky integration tests: 🗿
(idk what that means)
Flaky tests also get deleted
I think sigma got invented by sellers of self-help BS after "alpha" didn't sound cool enough anymore.
This is all derived from a misinterpreted experiment with wolves
You mean someone misinterpreted a paper and ran with it creating a wave of hype around a falsehood? Say it isn't so.
zeta is cooler
Riemann sigma
sounds like a setup for a ||sigma riemann spheres||
TL;DR: There's alpha wolves, which are the strong dominant winner types. Beta, which are their helpers or whatever, and omegas, which are the Weaklings Who Should Buy My Book.
Except this is based on observing wolves in captivity. In nature, wolf packs are almost always families without this dominance fighting. So if anything the experiment is comparable to humans in prisons.
so takeaway: prisons are human zoos
I mean...
zoos are animal prisons
zoos are prisons
convicted by a ||kangaroo court||
there used to be humans captive in zoos
humans when given the slightest opportunity to oppress others:
Zoos are prisons.
Toronto Zoo is a zoo.
Therefore, Toronto Zoo is a prison.
I appreciate logic even more now
conditioned on the original statement being true
is this entire argument built on the fact that john bumfuck who decided to name the zoo after his city is a rep for the city

Zoos arent prisons because no animal has ever stood trial and been incarcerated
That's probably not true
Is that a requirement of at least one animal, some of the animals, or all of them?
So are zoos jails then?
In legal history, an animal trial was the criminal trial of a non-human animal. Such trials are recorded as having taken place in Europe from the thirteenth century until the eighteenth. The most documented of these trials being from France, but they also occurred in Italy, Portugal, Spain, and other countries. In modern times, it is considered ...
there are many prisons that hold people without trial
However, in 1750, a female donkey was acquitted of charges of bestiality due to witnesses to the animal's virtue and good behaviour while her co-accused human was sentenced to death.[4]
Typically people who have yet to go to trial are held in jail, not prison
jail diff from prison
No?
Thats jail yea
oh
but no i meant like there are many cases in history of people being imprisoned for years without trial or charge
Animals that are usually found guilty of a crime are put down
yknow, history being full of jolly and whimsy
But if we go for the joke (rather than the more accurate: zoos are sanctuaries and educational centers), zoos are essentially guantanamo. Their rights are suspended for dubious reasons for an unknown period of time
and allegedly waterboarding
tbf, in the US deathrow can take awhile
Katya the Bear is a female brown bear native to Kazakhstan[13] who was imprisoned in 2004 after being found guilty of mauling two people in separate incidents.[14] Katya was held in the Arkalyk Prison in Kostanay.[13]
also states are very bad at actually killing people humanly and that causes a lot of delays. It's pretty horrific
imagine bunking with a bear
lord forbid women have fun 🙄
did u also watch that one video titled "the false evolution of execution methods"

I've listened to and read quite a bit on recent issues with executions in certain states
the tl;dr if the 50 min video is that US executions are so bad that some prisoners asked to be executed by firing squad instead
butthey have evolved in such a way that they are no longer seen as barbaric from the POV of the general public
like, lethal injection doesnt sounds as barbaric as firing squad, no?
but it is

I imagine one is instant and painless, the other is the injection
yeeaa
Execution methods are generally chosen to look not too barbaric, not to be the most painless/effective one.
If I'm to be executed put me down for the guillotine please.
injections r actually slow n painful
yea, summary of the vid
oh and actually, a lot of the medieval torture methods we know of today r just myths
have my brain get crushed by an anvil FR
that ppl made up just so they can put them in meuseums or such
lmao, ranking functional programming languages
||everything ended up in S-tier||
We are making a serious but subjective fp tier list.
Same content as an article: https://dev.to/zelenya/functional-programming-tier-list-4acl
💡 Useful links:
- Haskell: https://www.haskell.org/
- A History of Haskell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06x8Wf2r2Mc
- Scala: https://scala-lang.org/
- Functional Program Design in Scala: https://www....
based
I'm half convinced some days all I need is to vibe on the stretcher rack for like 15 minutes
AHAH
but what is lasagna generic over? ingredients?
what would Lasagna () be? what is a lasagna with a unit
maybe its a monoid
there surely must be mempty :: Lasagna if someone ate it
wheres stinckie when you need his mathemagics
stinckie 💀
What would unit even be?
he could have picked a different name if he didnt want that pun made on him 😭
in what category does the lasagna object exist
i eat it
based
there is a functor called my mouth
thats a const functor sir
turns everything into digested everything
immutable lasagna
does that mean you cant eat it
you can only go and cook smaller lasagna
Is it time for cube rule of food again
newtype Const a b = Const {unConst :: a}
instance Functor (Const a) where
fmap _ (Const a) = Const a
so the mouth functor is const because it maps every object in the food category to the same object in the uhh.. i dont know category
please not again
jokes on you i cant remember any of this notation/syntax
oh wait that i remember now
Its the perfect thing for long drawn out discussions over what definitions we choose to use, and try to make logical conclusions from
Which seems to be a recurring theme here anyway
is this chat a monad
no, it's an object
an object in the category of discord chats
what would the morphisms in this category be
an object is just a cringe closure
messages?
chat, is it real?
>>> type(chat)
monad
no its complex
sauce?
If and only if I have a ticket, I can get on the plane
I don’t have a ticket, so I can’t get on the plane
Chat, is this rizz?
garlic sauce >>
type shit fr

frfr
jonathan blow on garlic sauce (gone agressive)
ayo?
why is he blowing on garlic sauce
This is a mischaracterization
Rarely have I met a someone so angry who isn't angry.
i wasn't characterizing you
i was simply making an observation on the actions you were performing
that's what characterizing means, btw
That’s what it means lol
don't i have to make an observation on your character
characterizing doesn't need to be about character
sounds counterintuitive
englesh
real
is it parametric polymorphism or ad hoc polymorphism
ok but bro is still learning discrete math unit 1
but regardless, it is a typical discrete math topic. so I would say that even if unintentional, it is learning discrete math
Again, mischaracterization
What if it was already learned?
Did you not consider that a possibility?
there is no stop to learning. it's always ongoing
its very possible to learn something twice
or three times.
you'd call it review, though
Unless you forgot it all
me on my way to learn mappings 3 times in
set theory
type theory
category theory
each time understanding more on how to apply the same thing to different things
You can rehash material that was already learned
hashbrowns are great
You didn’t consider that a possibility in your characterization of me
too bad i guess
hashbrowns are great
agreed
Conceded?
nah
but also, rust's hash brown crate
are brown hashes good though
really cool
Tator tots.
depends on who you ask
are there brown hashes in a rainbow hash table
ngl i've never been able to get into tater tots
No that’s wrong
I'd like to bring to the table, thick sliced oven baked potatoes(chips/fries)
true. the best part about such potato products is the crust. the tot maximizes surface area to volume ratio
That's unfortunate. A staple meal of my roomies used to be a full bag of tots with a bowl of brown gravy. So good.
there is no brown in rainbow so a brown hash would be secure against rainbow table attacks right?
