#ot1-perplexing-regexing
1 messages Β· Page 103 of 1
well it does say modern
just what I needed
its rofi
rofi works on wayland? thats news tto me
works great
nice to know
hey
do you know of a way to change the default terminal rofi uses to open stuff like nvim and btop?
thanks
currently in wofi even after i set the default terminal, it tries to open konsole wich i dont have
so had to symlink konsole to kitty
its pretty bad workaround π
it has a --term no?
it does
but even after setting it to kitty
it just ignores me
since i'm running in in drun mode
oh
@strong spire It's a suggestion I've made. Like, when it would otherwise be the default.
But I'm not holding my breath.
Honestly I think it should be default π
I think it's fine as it is.
What are the best Nike shoes to buy?
What makes a shoe the best for you? For me, it's a shoe that fits and not much else.
The design and style
If we go with recent sale prices and an indicator then Nike SB Dunk Low White Lobster (Friends and Family).
If we go with popularity from a trading site then Nike SB Dunk Low Pro J-Pack Chicago is currently "the best"
You should ask the kids who work in the shops that make them.
i don't have to π i did say it
bing chilling
You could go with popular vote: https://stockx.com/brands/nike?gender=men&sort=most-active
Thatβs an ad populum fallacy
enjoy being stuffed by ads and paying for an operating system then.
And?
I had to make food. So I woke up.
what?
π
Never mind you didn't understand π
no, it's not
Goodnight.
psvm enjoys being a cog
And thatβs a failure in reasoning. Picking a shoe based on the most popular but not how the style and the design of the shoes look
Okay. Well, I tried to help. Have fun.
Take care and uhm.
Don't worry if you can't solve problems.
I can sometimes be unable to solve them too.
Sometimes I can only do 7 out of 10 or sometimes 8. But it's fine.
Because earlier I could do 0/10 and I call that an improvement.
Just keep solving problems with consistency, and you'll be a great mathematician.
May the Force be with you.
keezy, you need to just stop regurgitating definitions and actually understand the nuance
I appreciate your help though
Doesn't sound like you do. I'll avoid bothering you with it in the near future.
πΏ
It's got the same kind of energy as a kid who finds some text online like the Book of Five Rings or some text on Bushido and vows to apply it to their lives.
real
How many of you wear Naruto headbands in your day-to-day?
Explain why itβs logical to select an item out of a bunch due to it being the most popular voted
man
you've lost the nuance of the situation
and the plot
Good luck
Style and design are subjective anyway, whats the point of asking others about it
Some people want stuff because it's popular. I don't but who am I to judge?
That's the fashion industry.
I guess
um, that's an ad populum fallacy
So.
Whats the best colour
do better π
pink π
Youre wrong its blue
purple
I don't advocate it but I acknowledge it exists.
it is what it is
$150 CAD for Nike Shoes π
that's cheap
Canadian bucks arent a real thing
.wa short 150CAD to USD
about 109.96 US dollars
Considering the first pair I mentioned last went for 25,000 USD; I'd say 150 CAD is a decent price. 
mikey shoes
My gfs hokas were Β£150
That's a weird turn of phrase.
it is what it is
Tautology for one.
Bought new drip
adidas much better but okay i like green
Looks girly
Where is green?
the logo and the sole
It looks green to you?
it does yeah
One of us is color blind
looks cyan-y
.color #b2d8d8
It looks somewhat similar to this IMO
You really used paint to swab the colour of my shoe? π
nah, I eyeballed it
yo this ot name actually says what I was doing few moments ago
White shoes are always a mistake
You picked wrong keezy, is there a fallacy against fashion?
i wear my sunglasses at night so i can so i can watch you wesve and breathe your story lines π΅
this is the kinda posting we need you to be doing
skill issue
Not everybody walks on water like you.
why not? maybe they need to learn some logical fallacies
I am glad you said this!
Logical Fallacy of the night: Accident Fallacy
(also known as: destroying the exception)
Itβs when you apply a rule to all situations when they are exceptions.
Logical Form:
X is a common and accepted rule.
Therefore, there are no exceptions to X.
Example #1:
I believe one should never deliberately hurt another person, thatβs why I can never be a surgeon.
Donβt form your arguments like this.
that was a joke
if they are hurting while you perform surgery then yes you shouldn't be a surgeon, where tf is the anaesthesia
in my nose
People are spoiled with anesthesia. Surgery used to not be performed with anesthesia.
Surgeons had to be quick.
when did they stop
When they discovered ether.
nevermind
I accidentally a word.
For your edification, young person.
doesnt change the fact that you kliled godzila with that missing verb
you are a hero
Godzilla is fictional. Like the Easter Bunny.
and the queen of england π
1 + 1
wrong, its 11
those were strings
its not binary
it cant be
binary deez nutz
no
why
this' not anime, happy?
here, theres a story
just read british novels?
thte romance ones?
because those are good
better
my colonised subject powers informed me that my master was here
so i knew
do you like being the master now π
using that word was a mistake
a massive one
oh o
oh no
how did a brit become a not-master?
thats impossible
smash
wait ni
no
i meant Hulk Smash
hey the name of the channel matches #ot1-perplexing-regexing
the only weird thing is that i dont think that the scots are as depressed as the southern scots
and the eastern irish
and the northern french
why are you happy about that btw?
π
you dont know what the southern scots are?
everyone knows who they are
is that a joke? /s
phew
i thought i said something not politically correct
brits
brits
and brits
yeah
nice
make sure to click a pic of the win xp nation
it looks like a default wallpaper
i meant that scotland kinda looks like the win xp background
due to its open fields
and rolling hills
i havent even been out of my state/province
dying?
oh
that would be horrific
that would be horrific
instant skin cancer
.
alright, it would be like limbo then
no change, absolute eternity
thats also horrifying
vegeta?
vegimite
tasty
Still not as salty as Vegeta though.
nawwww
i agree π /jjjjjjjj
oh
i read that as "still not as tasty as Vegeta though"
is it your appendix?
not as disgusting as this face, i presume?
wth
although, nowadays job promotions depend on how good of a vaccume you can make inside your mouth
so i dont blame you
you sentence was worded pretty badly π
i have a better dad joke
==
"well, that sucks"
"girl"? what made you think that?
not really
what rule?
usiing java?
sure, go ahead
i'm curious
you!!!
how could you?!?!
the revolution will not spare you
the 4th international will make sure to give you appropriate punishment
being this
btw, whats the time where you are?
why are you awake π ?
its 9:30 am here
told you i have colonised powers
i'm from the crown jewel colony of the former empire
they dont teach you what's the crown jewel colony there?
?
what 1 in 8?
oh
yeah
its very overpopulated
a nice controlled war could fix that
anyway, bye
gotta bathe now
can you fly across the glob in 5 mins?
sure
make sure to bring your own bath toys
that sentence sound wrong π
gotta go, bye
bro wat
thats the standard punishment of the 4th international
real
it took me 3+hours to bathe π
gen alpha is doomed
share my pain
:(
π
brought more tears to my eyes than ssniperwolf's apology
truly a helldivers moment
helldivers truly is cinematic
That's a low bar innit
higher than my height probably
compared to the west at least
would that be higher or lower than logan paul's apology though?
guys, things are getting crazy in India π
the ruling party spreads nationalist propaganda through whatsapp
using copypastas
so that they dont have to directly spread it
bruh
I literally just got one now claiming how india's been a superpower since the ruling party came into power
And how India is the "Vishaguru"
Visha == World
Guru == Master/Teacher (They meant master here)
They literally are claiming India is the "Master of the world"
The PM literally has a massive cult of personality π. The President is a nominal executive in our constituion since he has no actual power and is forced to listed to the PM
I'm getting some very bad flashbacks
very bad ones
Well it does seem as if the hot air balloon business has been in decline, perhaps we now know why.
?
Whats LGBTQ? a new protocol?
$ ufw allow lgbtq
I feel as though there's some joke to be made, there.
Well it does seem as if the hot air balloon business has been in decline, perhaps we now know why.
will that ever be explained?
How can you tell when a politician is lying?
||When they're moving their lips.||
Consequently, it's the ventriloquist politicians you've got to look out for.
for some revolution
Politicians are said to be full of hot air, i.e. bluster and empty promises.
It is perhaps a slightly dated idiom.
yeah, i got that
i dont really know that many idioms since english isnt my first language
it's only gonna get worse π©
its, gonna turn into china any day now
Reagan.
exit polls look terrible too
the most scary decision i think the goverment could take in a few years is turning India into a one party system
yeah
like putin?
and china?
damn
they have the support
Why do Indians vote for them then?
Do they do it on purpose?
Like a fetish or something?
one party system is a weird way of saying dictatorship
they capitalise on nationalism
they have declared hinduism as the most importent ideology
What's that
they capitalise on the hate for islam
Whaaa
the most popular religion in india
That is kinda weird
they recently send a bunch of 1st, 2nd and even 3rd sometimes bangladeshi migrents over the border
backk to bangladesh
from west bengal
it's done all over the world atp
what
formerly a part of india
by some terrorist organisation?
no
no>
what
no?
are you thinking of afghanisthan
yea
bruh
Minor, indeed.
There is region named Bengal (It was a kingdom in the past), the british gave the West of it to between India and then formed East Bengal with the rest
which was a part of pakistan
Most people here believve Bangladesh to be a traitor
food ofc
opium
noooo
yess
Frankly I could care less.
oh well
they have more pop than russia
did you mean couldn't care less?
gifs dont really load for me π
are you on a metered connection or something
no
woah
even my own pic doesnt load
on my computer
holy moly
wack
is your ISP scamming you or something
its like 2mbps right now
yah, but its india. Every isp is like this
that's low
so couldnt care less
woah
its usually at like 500kbps
really low
my speeds never go down 50 Mbps
I'm getting 170 Mbps rn
india's still developing, so that much is expected
thats god like here in my region
But isn't India like the IT hub or something
the south is
do you not live in a metro city?
i live in a city, just not a massive one
its medium
a suburb?
no way
The buildings are more packed together than if you stuffed all the greeks in the parliment building
are you eating this right now
doesnt even load, soooo..... dont know
lmao
it says naan
idk what that is
not a a number
I know I know
seems to some kind of bread
nah
it is a well-liked flatbread with a chewy texture
it is
keep up
NaN
NaN
Woah
both are good though
where are you from?
Jupiter.
sounds gassy
It is.
nice, bet its nice there
No idea why I exist here.
have you been to the big storm thing
The whole thing spins so god damn fast
so that you get crushed by the gravity?
jupiter spins slower than earth, wdym?
and there's a freaking storm raging here for like a thousand years
its not a storm, its a bleeding wound
analog reference
oh no I am a Saiyan
it spins faster
nah
.wa s jupiter rotation speed
.wa s earth and jupiter rotation speed
great
get confused
now which is which
the day is 10 hours long!
.wa s jupiter rotation speed - earth rotation speed
about 27080 miles per hour
thanks
π
how do you even get rotation speed
so it's faster
shouldn't it be rotations per second or something
that'd be a very small number
assume its the velocity of the surface
or rotations per hour
yeah
radius * angular speed
but it's a sphere
.wiki planet rotation speed calculation
Saturn
Neptune, the other giant planets in the Solar System, are also oblate but to a lesser extent. The combination of the bulge and rotation rate means that the
Neptune
in speed from 400Β m/s along the equator to 250Β m/s at the poles. Most of the winds on Neptune move in a direction opposite the planet's rotation. The
thanks
this guy right here is a stalker.
comes in when the conversation gets interesting
then disappears
that's not what a stalker is
whatever
lurking
never been stalked before
terminally online
except for that incident back in 2000
holy moly
one search about india
and this is in my recommendations now
nice
How is this thought provoking?
nahh man, you guys worship cows
and uhm
we
kinda don't.
you know.
we dont, we just dont eat them
we also sell beef, so there's that
cows are a menace to traffic
wait wha
they shit everywhere on the road
i'm glad
you kill and sell the thing you worship?
they need some pop control
we dont worship cows
what in the name of lord.
only a very specific fictional cow
whaaaaa
please come, we have good food
the traffic is
wrong angel
nice gif, too bad i cant see it
Satan was also an angel
so is Lucifer.
lucifer is satan?
no?
anyway, i dont get what you guys are freaking out about
it's complicated
i only mentioned good food
.wa s lucifer = satan?
Failed to get response.
classic
hahahah
what
and posto
isn't that Italian?
also isn't that pasta
ehh
what are those cubes
potat
and those leaves
paneer
coriander
are you guys herbivores?
who knows
nah
I thought you meant aloo posto
i eat egg
posto is a ingrediant, aloo posto is a dish
made from posto
you can make a lot more
there are a lot of vegeterians here though
this is what the search gave me
the rulling party supports vegetarianism
that looks a lot like
uhm
never mind
if i say it i get banned
what
cum to us
wrong spelling
No
fun fact: even though posto is one of the most popular ingrediants in bengal, its also the seed for opium
Please remember some people are underage. Including me.
opium seeds == posto
pithink
poppy seeds

they arent addictive btw
so they are okay to eat
they are expensive though
guys we ballin
Logical fallacy of the day: βArgument from incredulityβ
It asserts that a proposition must be false because it contradicts one's personal expectations or beliefs, or is difficult to imagine.
It can take in the form of:
I cannot imagine how F could be true; therefore F must be false.
I cannot imagine how F could be false; therefore F must be true.
Real-life Examples:
βThere is just no way that the concept of evolution is right; it just doesnβt make any sense to me. Creationism is a much better explanation of how we came to be.β
βI can't imagine how humans could have evolved from single-celled organisms; it just doesn't make sense to me. There is no way that the theory of evolution is right.β
Just because you canβt believe nor imagine X to be true, doesnβt mean that itβs false and vice-versa. Thatβs why itβs a fallacy.
if the propsal is just actually absurd, would the replier arguing against it be still under this fallacy?
There's just no way people are going to give me large sums of money. It just doesn't make sense to me.
there's no way lambda is useful, it just doesnt make sesce to me
Useful, yes. Superfluous, also yes.
Context matters but yes
Keezy moment
you should do this but for Python facts, it'd be a lot more appropriate
How?
simply
I donβt know what you mean. Iβm going to need an example

Why are people responding with a the thinking emoji?
just the same thing you're doing, but with python instead of logical fallacies
Oh you mean programming fundamentals?
well, doesn't need to be fundamentals
those are boring
(that's why people have reacted negatively to your fallacyposting, probably)
Is the argument from incredulity fallacy hard to understand?
no
I donβt get why they reacted with the thinking emoji
It's in OT and I am enjoying reading these
πΏ
What emotion are you conveying when you are posting that emoji?
it's too in depth to explain over discord
have you never felt like πΏ
πΏ is not only an emotion, but a state of mind and being
do you ever feel
why did you guys hate chatgpt
like a plastic πΏ
sometimes
drifting through the wind
wanting to start again
"Do you want to see the most beautiful thing I ever filmed? It was one of those days when it's a minute away from snowing. And there's this electricity in the air, you can almost hear it, right? And this bag was just... dancing with me ... like a little kid begging me to play with it. For fifteen minutes. That's the day I realized that there w...
Do we hate it?
I think so
Could you be confusing other reactions to it with hate?
I can't speak for anyone else but it's really not even worth a strong dislike from me, much less hate.
I think what they're misinterpreting is people not liking everything being done via chatgpt
Logical Fallacy of the afternoon (EST): βAppeal to Faithβ
It is the assertion that one must have (the right kind of) faith in order to understand the argument.
Logical form:
X is true.
If you have faith, you will see that. ```
Example:
Person A: "I don't believe that the Earth is only 6,000 years old. There is overwhelming scientific evidence showing that the Earth is billions of years old."
Person B: "You just have to have faith that the Earth is 6,000 years old. The Bible says it, and that's all the proof you need."
Just because you have faith, doesnβt mean that X is true. Itβs a logical fallacy.
i see are tacitly rejecting the proposal to do this for python
post hoc fallacy
post keezy fallacy
Keezy moment
Tries to iamverysmart post then doesn't understand that nobody cares because nobody asked
@uneven pine not sure what youβre talking about. This person says their enjoying it.
I did say that.
that sounds like a skill issue to me
HI @pulsar heart
"If pigs fly, then cars are driven."
UwU
you can't assume anything about Q if P is false, though
Logical fallacy of the evening (EST): βAffirming a Disjunctβ
Also known as: the fallacy of the alternative disjunct.
Making the false assumption that when presented with an either/or possibility, that if one of the options is true that the other one must be false.
Logical forms
Logical Forms:
P or Q.
P.
Therefore, not Q.
Example:
I am going to bed or watching TV. I am exhausted, so I will go to bed; therefore, I cannot watch TV.
bro is a logician
but also why are you posting this, isn't this like discrete math unit #1
why keep posting basics when there is more interesting stuff to post about
real
Itβs physically possible to be in bed and watch TV. Thatβs why itβs a logical fallacy
yeah isn't that obvious
You want me to post advanced logical fallacies then?
sure
preferably advanced Python
I think itβs easy to understand these logical fallacies because we are all programmers so we structure logical decisions in our code.
yeah i liked discrete math class too
it's easy to understand because it's easy
That sentence is redundant.
You could have removed the βbecause itβs easy.β from your sentence
yet it conveyed a rhetorical message that was easily understood because of it's structure
not everything is about logic
o.O
we did some combinatorics too
Discrete Math is important for DSA
don't know if i liked that unit much
What makes you state such a claim?
search within yourself and you will find it to be true
Iβm not going to provide evidence for you
Robin your avatar looks similar to mine
real
You made a claim and you didnβt say anything that supports your argument
i don't need you to, I believe the claim already
how are you gonna prove that everything is logic
yours is a birb and mine is pokemon
i took a cool bird picture the other day, ill probably change my pfp to that
oh?
i need to get it off the camera first though
canadian jay
oh neat
Just because you believe it, doesnβt mean itβs true. Thatβs a argument from incredulity fallacy.
where π¦
I'm not arguing, I'm telling
it would've been more fitting to get a picture of a robin
godel ?
model?
Your line of reasoning is fallacious which is my point.
logic, like much of math, is but a construct of the mind that only sometimes reflects reality
βI believe X, therefore itβs true.β Thatβs a logical fallacy
you cannot so easily reduce everything down to logic
i never held this line of reasoning. you have confirmation bias
You told me the claim that not everything is logic. You donβt want to make a statement that supports your claim because you believe it to be true.
i never said such thing
How did I not steelman your position correctly?
burden of proof fallacy
proof is left as an excercise for the reader
search within yourself and you will find the answer
Again, I am not going to make your argument for you
did i ask though
based
Thatβs basically what youβre doing lol
when?
βSearch within yourselfβ
what about it?
whats going on here
I want to hear the answer from you. Not from me
o.O
what are yall searching?
omg what happened to your avatar @warped sentinel
they change with the season
noooo
"is everything logic?" argument
I want the old one back
this proof is left to the reader
I like this one
He made the claim that not everything is based on logic but he didnβt say anything that supported that claim
hi cereal! Are you a cereal killer? @small coral
would it be true if he did?
no that's cypheriel
but is it?
Depends on his supporting statements
that's fair
an argument where neither sides have whole supports are simply clashing opinions
Making a claim without statements that support that claim doesnβt bring your point across
Exactly
one doesn't need supporting evidence for a statement to be true
happy pride month to you too
Why do you say that?
because it's true
this is almost getting philosophical
consider: 1 + 1 = 2
(there's a whole book on proving this)
You know thatβs a fallacy right?
that's irrelavent
everything is a fallacy at this point
steam deck rip off
and that is describing the state of the conversation, and is not sincerely meant to be logical
in other words, that is not logic
and so everything can't be logic
axiom be like: lemme introduce myself
real
Appeal to Self-evident Truth fallacy.
Making the claim that something is "self-evident" when it is not self-evident in place of arguing a claim with reason.
Logical Form:
Person 1 claims Y without evidence.
Person 2 asks for evidence.
Person 1 claims that Y is self-evident.
Example #2:
Sara: No human should ever kill another human being.
Dottie: Why not?
Sara: It's self-evident.
it doesn't matter if it's self evident or not
real
reminder that godel's incompleteness theorems exist, and thus that using logic to prove all true things is impossible
Making a claim that βnot everything is based on logicβ is not axiomatic
opposing it is also not axiomatic
what are yall thoughts
I wasnβt opposing his claim. I just told psvm that I am not going to conduct his supporting statements for him
okay
Why did you put scratch in D tier
that's decided then
It is obviously S+ tier
My thought is that you are interupting an ongoing conversation by double posting.
it's nice but wrong
i don't know most of these so i am not qualified to answer
yes
oops
c and go in S is uh what no, and lua is lower by association to roblox
NEOVIM??????
there's no opposition so there is no reason for an argument
and the claim is supposedly true so far
you don't have to
because its fun but not useful really
but you can do anything in scratch
but propositions are always either true or false, regardless of supporting evidence π
make a kernel?
and holy c is better than c++ genuinly
do I have the link for you
That doesnβt sound right at all
I like fuzzy logic for these reasons
it is. that's the definition of a proposition
remember that mathematics does not necessarily have to align with the real world
here is link if yall want https://tiermaker.com/create/programming-languages-2023-16558614
It was written by someone who has very little understanding of the languages they're claiming are superior.
So if I made the proposition that thereβs life on other planets. Thatβs true?
it can be either true or false
or neither or both, or something else
a logical proposition is different from a 'proposition' used in daily conversation
there should be a boolean fallacy
u sure?
What if itβs an optional bool?
You should read into the basics of logic theorems and propositional logic. Understanding what a proposition is will be helpful for you. Especially if you insist on posting logical fallacy definitions here.
yeah logic doesn't necessarily have to be consistent, does it?
Okay but if I am making the claim that thereβs life on other planets, I would need statements to support my claim. Correct?
no
You should read about propositional logic.
My claim is that I am the coolest person here
have you taken a discrete math course? afaict its a required course for a lot of engineering disciplines
false, it's me
proof
me
Yep
false, uts robin
i don't know you so i oppose that claim
fake
i think that all cool people must be known to everyone in an area or something
didn't you learn basic propositional logic then?
What makes you the coolest person here?
Maybe I misunderstood what proposition meant
what did you misunderstand it as?
perhaps it can be cleared up
Proposing a statement
ok that's cool
as was mentioned a proposition that we're typically used to is something like a suggestion or recommendation, while a proposition in propositional logic is a statement that is either true or false
Okay so itβs a boolean value
not exactly
but close enough
a boolean value can be used to express the truth value of a proposition, though
Did your discrete math class not cover propositional logic?
If psvm believes that not everything is based around logic, why is it logically correct for him to not make any statements that supports his claim? This is what I am not understanding
consider: you cannot evaluate the claim "not everything is logic" using logic
You can still make statements that supports your claim. Even if you need to explain it philosophically
I've literally never heard of discrete math not covering that
strange 
Lol I did discrete mathematics and we didn't cover that
unless you mean, "no, it did"
I can send the syllabus if you want
You used a negative in your question so I read that wrong
I am fascinated, yes please
Also, it is the end of my mini-vacation so as I travel back home I want to re-iterate:
traveling by train >>>>>>>>>>>
why is it logically correct for him to not make any statements that supports his claim?
nobody said that it was
I donβt know why people use negatives and double negatives to ask questions
Cancel them out
you can't cancel out a single negative tho
sometimes it's more natural
"aren't you unsatisfied?"
"are you satisfied?"
these questions ask 2 different things
βIt is not the case that is it not raining.β Sentence is confusing
Cancel the double negatives out
sad and angry us noises
@honest star This is the syllabus for the further mathematics A-Level in the UK (taken from age 16-18)
Graph theory, basic algorithms, linear programming, simplex and a couple others
happy -> happy
not unhappy -> an emotion other than the opposite of happy (includes happy)
hmm
negative prefixes seem to be more specific compared to "not"
Isnβt that what made you say that you donβt need supporting statements if a claim is true?
i didn't notice that before
The lesson I am choosing to take from this is that UK education is weird and slightly nonsensical =P
so true
can't even spell math right, tbf
Just live on the east coast US :3c
no
So will you be so kind to make supporting statements of your claim that not everything is based around logic?
no
Septa is great if you don't need to rely on it being on time
Well then your claim isnβt very persuasive is it?
i looked at the data and it's not that bad. about 75% for buses and 95% for regional rail. but i don't think it's even across all routes
why does it have to be
i'm not persuading, i'm telling π
dum fed laws having no teeth thanks to reg capture means that NS or BNSF or UP or whoever just blocks the line for 20 years and doesn't get a slap on the wrist
Because I am challenging his idea
what's so troubling with "not everything is logic"
what's the difference between "challenging" and "opposing"
that doesn't change the fact that a proposition can be true or false and is independent of persuasion or supporting evidence
Do you concede?
no
He believes it to be true though which is why I am asking him to make supporting statements
no matter what, a proposition is what it is
golfed
What I think you are missing is that they have no requirement or inclination to do what you are asking. 
that's mostly emphasizing on the "be" verb which implies that the statement is about its existence
it do exist
but definition
That that is is.
real
If you canβt make supporting statements of what you believe in, then how do I know that theyβre not talking out of your ass?
ad hominem
You don't. At some point a person doesn't have to argue with you and you just have to make peace with that.
Wrong question: Why does it matter?
Sometimes, you just have to trust them
why is "not everything is logic" challenged? is it false?
I wouldn't have enough time to make everyone backup their claim in a conservation
if so, why is it false?
also didn't pub already give you proof, though: #ot1-perplexing-regexing message
I want to be on his side, I want to believe that heβs correct but heβs not showing me anything thatβs convincing
if you want to be on my side, why did you refuse to produce evidence in favor?
But we are showing you, through example, that your focused point of view on logic is not allowing you to see what you wish to see.
Because I am not going to do the work for you. You made the claim. I didnβt
why do you want to be on my side?
Because what youβre saying seems correct but you didnβt make any supporting statements
also, consider this: #ot1-perplexing-regexing message
why should it need supporting is my question
I think you missed the part where psvm told me to βlook within myself and I will find the answerβ
I didn't miss that part. I've been reading for quite a while now.
Thatβs how you structure an argument
Make claim X
Make statements Y and Z that support the claim X
Thatβs how you structure your position
it's obviously not axiomatic, but the opposition is not either
Otherwise, your claim will sound baseless.
Imagine if I said that I am the most charismatic discord user on this server but I didnβt provide any supporting statements to back up my claim
and neither of them are proven
haven't i given something to consider already anyway
fr
my ultimate weapon in arguments is "man i dont give a shit"
The debater should not disprove their opponentβs claim if the opponent didnβt provide any supporting statements of their claim. Thatβs a burden of proof fallacy
based, snow leopard posting
You do like injecting random images into the flow of an ongoing discussion, that much I've noticed. :)
why did we go from mathematical logic to debate
if there's no supporting statements
why have an argument at all
why start an argument
my bad
that's never really been clarified
if it's never meant to be structured as one
proofs are kinda debates, no?
no
Just because to you is baseless, doesnβt mean itβs actually baseless
oh ok
didn't say it's a problem
Who decides if it's baseless or not

i try to type useful stuff along with my random image
most of the time it isn't but that's because I'm not that bright
to have an argument in the first place means that there must be at least some proof for both sides
pub's original statement was that not everything is about logic, it seems baseless to you but it may not be
I did
A claim with no supporting statements is a baseless argument
so i am confused on what we're talking about here
What a debate is(n't).
and to make an argument out of "not everything is logic" means that there must be proof for it
else it's just a clash of opinions
Itβs baseless because there was no supporting statements behind it
which leads to irrelevancy
But who decides if it's a supporting statement and therefore baseless or not
is it baseless to you or is it actually baseless? and how do you define actually baseless?
One person could view the statement as supporting it while the other could not
but i gave a supporting statement
Line of reasoning. Logic.
keezy, you prefer using logic to prove things, but logic cannot prove itself
Yes it can. They are called axioms.
and faith 'n stuff
isn't this a godel's incompleteness theorem thing
you can't prove an axiom with the other axioms
. by definition
Thank you. Thatβs a supporting statement
i'm pretty sure he just entirely ignored what i said earlier
Does a set of all things contain itself?
what definition of "set" are you using?
Ha! great question.
the typical "set" definition means that it is not possible to construct a "set of all things"
lol
as robin said, look up godel's incompleteness theorem. nothing in mathematics or anything else can ever be truly proven
So⦠1+1 might really be 3?
you can let that be one of your axioms
mmnm π€·
It's just that there will be true statements that cannot be proven.
Not so simple as that. It presents that in any reasonal system there will be truths that cannot be proven.
Axioms are things you must accept as true to proceed, it's a starting point. It's not proof.
in a base-10 number system where the numbers go from 0 1 3 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 that is true
oh
lol
what is truth
||(john 18:38)||
real
what is love, baby dont hur-
πΏ
I will hurt you.
bannable imo
alright good talk fellow humans, time for bed
||(and so with that unanswered question pilate declared there was no basis for the claims against the christ)||
Am doggo thank
people don't make sense sometimes
Sometimes?
π
they just walk out on unanswered questions or something
Sometimes they sleep!
true