Feedback!

[flint dragon]

Poke

[stark plinth]

miner

@minerpl

[crimson mortar]

🎉

[flint dragon]

[stark plinth]

I love minerpl from poland

[cobalt crypt]

[dense cloud]

🔥

[vocal zinc]

🎉

[earnest bridge]

[dense apex]

Peak 🔥

[rustic nova]

[manic marlin]

[regal condor]

🎉

[stark plinth]

@vocal zinc I miss when text emotes had faces, like this: :-)

[stark plinth]

had noses, not faces

[compact blade]

that new trending system seems like a lot better way IMO

[stark plinth]

:^)

[compact blade]

thank you veld!!

[flint dragon]

100%!

It's gonna continuously be improved, similarily to search ;)

[stark plinth]

;-)

[worldly geyser]

Oh heck yeah!! Thank you fo much, I'm so excited to get rewards set up <3 (already been brainstorming plans hehe)

The trending system seems like it's gonna be great too!

[compact blade]

just out of interest, how are 'trending' bots selected?

is it based on votes/views/invites?

[flint dragon]

it samples growth and invites as a rolling average, then extracts the delta from today vs last period.

so tl;dr, starting to use votes should give u a high change to appear in the list :)

whereas the last system was more chaotic imo

this one should give exactly small bots/servers a better chance to appear in results

[worldly geyser]

Will the trending system come to servers as well if not already implemented? Or just for bots

oop nvm

[frozen patio]

why not https://webhook-topgg.com/ out of curiosity
👀

[rocky cairn]

I love it I hope this is a great jump for all us small developers and server owners

[crimson mortar]

new webhooks system better

one click install

[dusky quest]

Seems cool

[waxen snow]

What is happening to webhooks v1?

Also weird that the v1 url is showing documentation for v2

[frozen patio]

would have been cool to work with the staff member that has put a lot of work into this specifically for the past few years tho

[mortal pendant]

we all do

[flint dragon]

I did reach out to mr woo

[frozen patio]

you did?

[median notch]

What happened to previously configured webhooks?

[flint dragon]

they're in the legacy section

scroll down

[median notch]

oooh

im blind

[crimson mortar]

new webhooks have a different auth style

[frozen patio]

cant imagine he would have declined it tho? 👀

[crimson mortar]

👀

[waxen snow]

is it going to be removed? if yes after how long

[flint dragon]

no they won't be removed at this time

But, as with other legacy pieces, they go into maintenance mode, and no more updates will be provided for them

[worldly geyser]

Oh one last question, was Vote Manager also reached out to? o:

[median notch]

are those the legacy docs?
https://docs.top.gg/docs/Resources/webhooks

[median notch]

-# that thing sucks ass imo; it had too much downtime and issues when I used it

[worldly geyser]

-# i just like the customizable embeds tbh

[plucky summit]

Votes

[flint dragon]

The integration docs are open, please do encourage your favourite bots to integrate!

[median notch]

-# Sapphire role assignment message was my solution

[flint dragon]

https://docs.top.gg/docs/API/v1/integrations/

[plucky summit]

The 3 days coding marathon was really fun, thanks Veld for this opportunity

[median notch]

Imma need to update my open source solution as well xd

[median notch]

Veld? 👀 Are there even "legacy docs"?

[plucky summit]

Yes, new one is https://docs.top.gg/docs/API/v1/webhooks

[median notch]

I was not talking about the new ones, I was talking about the "legacy" docs

also why the heck is it called "v2" if it's "v1"

[flint dragon]

yea dw about it

its because the current version is technically v1

then the legacy api became v0

so i just moved it at the end to v1 docs

its not technically a versioned api

[median notch]

ye I know, but it is written there "v2"

[flint dragon]

because its the second version hahaha

[median notch]

xDDD

[flint dragon]

i just always called it webhooks v2 internally :)

[placid shore]

Itll be great if this had a key section

[median notch]

btw I would have loved to have a side-by-side comparison between v0 and v1 😅
I now fed perplexity deep research with all the resources and repos and it now gave me an overview which I can finally understand 😅

[flint dragon]

you no longer need a key, we provide one to you :)

check out https://github.com/top-gg/webhooks-v2-nodejs-example

[plucky summit]

I dropped everything from the old system and just started something "new" from the ground up by reading the docs tbh, so much changed that I didnt wasted any migration time xD

[median notch]

I need to wipe whole files lmao

[plucky summit]

Yep same

Votes got coded in the last 3 days from the ground up after my work

Take it as chance to write new clean code

[median notch]

average programmer sidequest

I did my github webhook thingy in 2 days after work as well
well It only processes push events I didn't need much more xD

[compact escarp]

sheesh webhooks

[flint dragon]

based and stuff

[compact escarp]

very

Though the integration part seems really interesting ngl

[crude prawn]

vote tracker isnt joining my server through the install button

figured it out, had to just install through the actual bot page

[dusk kernel]

Nicee!

This is the V2 webhook or v1?
because in documentation it says v1 and in the code example in Git, it says v2...

[flint dragon]

V1 officially on the api. iteration two. I'll remove the v2 from stuff momentarily

[compact escarp]

perhaps allowing the information that the bot has to be invited

[dusk kernel]

Perfect! thanks! 🙂

[lusty hare]

Absolutely amazing

Thank you 🙏🙏

Why did you decide with one header for the signature?

[flint dragon]

pretty much industry standard for webhooks

[lusty hare]

Ah ok

Cool

Appreciate the work

[lusty hare]

Am I blind or is there no way to test a webhook thingy is working like before?

oh nvm, if the token is there you don't see that bit

[median notch]

I got some feedback:

Please change it to string or number to clearly specify how the timestamp is sent. unix? posix? ISO String?
A Date is a non-POJO type which cannot be directly in a JSON format.

also please be more specific on what can be expected here (Or link to the section of the page where this is specified)

[lusty hare]

Wdym by this one?

The other one I can kinda get behind but there’s an example of what’s expected below

[median notch]

e.g. "discord" - what else?

[plucky summit]

type can be "bot", "server" and "game"

platform can be "discord" and "roblox"

Explained here => https://docs.top.gg/docs/Models/v1/project

[median notch]

Ah,I thought a link somewhere would be good :)

[flint dragon]

Fair enough, the "Date" type for top.gg's docs usually refers to an ISO date string.

e.g. 2013-03-10T02:00:00+06:00

[median notch]

Uhuh 👀

[median notch]

oh btw... I think you copied too much from the AI response here

[flint dragon]

lmao

true

[median notch]

on the projets page

[flint dragon]

ye i pushed a fix lolol

seems like my link also didnt work so i fixed that too

Appreciate the callout!

[median notch]

this as well

I think you did the `` outside the hyperlink

oh, fixed

Get Vote Status by User
btw what if the user never voted? Is it undefined or null then?

also, are these schemas still used in v1?
https://docs.top.gg/docs/Resources/webhooks#schema

or are they for v0 legacy webhooks only?

[crimson mortar]

Those schemas seem like v0 legacy webhooks to me

this could still be wrong but the webhook types I have for my integration is this: https://discord.mx/t/AD3jPnc4nW.ts

[crimson mortar]

the schemas for the new webhooks, seem to be found here: https://docs.top.gg/docs/API/v1/webhooks#votecreate

[unreal osprey]

Could we please get the query parameter back? I rely on that for internal metrics also how long will v0 be supported?
https://docs.top.gg/docs/Resources/webhooks#schema

[median notch]

I agree, that is na important part 👀
They said no ETA yet, but not in the nearest future.
Probably when more than 70% (or more) are using v1 webhooks and not v0 anymore.

[median notch]

Yeye

[unreal osprey]

i understand not a lot of people probably use the query param but it is a really nice feature if you want to give users a choice of rewards or just want to track which vote upsells convert the best etc

[flint dragon]

Most likely many years coming

And yeah, the query param can come back :)

[unreal osprey]

thanks!

[flint dragon]

Will probably support the full UTM schema then FYI

utm_source, medium, campaign, term, and content.

[unreal osprey]

lfgggg

well the old one did already anyway

you could pass whatever you wanted in

[flint dragon]

technically yeah, but I like following standards since it makes it easier to explain and refer back to in docs :)

[median notch]

Sounds nice

[wooden pewter]

How often do the trending thing update and what do we need to focus on to get on trending section?

[flint dragon]

It’s a mix it installs and view growth. You just want this to be higher that previous weeks in the last month

[solemn jackal]

oh this is a cute nice update :3

[flint dragon]

Thank u cassie!!

[high tiger]

i think new webhooks should have more retries, 15 seconds total is a bit too little

[flint dragon]

yeah, you will be able to re-schedule them manually in the future in case of an outage

[high tiger]

oh cool

[limber night]

Small feedback, i would like to know more about the integrations, so i think it would be worth adding a link to their website or at least top.gg page under /dashboard/integrations

we only have the option to install them, but i wanna learn about them before installing them

[lusty hare]

^ or even clicking the pfp which takes you there

[unreal osprey]

Yeah I also suggested that when I was beta testing for the team at TopStats. Allowing then to have an external link to a page that explains all their features would be a good addition. It's impossible to compare these or fully understand what they do without more info.

[flint dragon]

Would it be interesting if we added a button to the bot page?

[placid shore]

yes

[limber night]

Mmmmmmm i think it would be better under integrations as that's where people are gonna look for that information