I've already said what I wanted to in previous comments. I just came back because responding to arrogant people sure of their own rightness is funny for a while.
You are only trying to claim that repeated insults aren't ad hominem because you know full well it is. No serious debate would let you go on with such attacks unpunished and you can rightly be called out on it. The more I look at what you've typed the clearer it is it was done quickly, and it lends credence to the idea that you are responding out of anger rather than putting thought and effort into it. But I really wasn't kidding about issues with understanding.
For example:
You are missing a 'Do' in the first part of your response. This isn't completely necessary for some English speakers, but it might be a stumbling block for people who aren't native.
You should have used 'Is that' before understandable also for clarifying reasons. (And I ain't going away as long as you give me comments to attack. Its fun!)
A better way to word the next sentence would have been: "Someone who'd just said 'skull issue lmfao' would understand me fine." (That is bad reasoning. Just because someone can insult doesn't mean they understand. Honestly it is good evidence they DON'T understand and you need to clarify if they just throw an insult and nothing productive)
There are several instances that are double-spaced such as potentially both uses of ad hominem and before BTW.
You are missing an 'it' in 'Check it out.' Which significantly changes the meaning from 'look at that' to 'leave officially.'
The last sentence is so weirdly worded I'm not sure what you mean there. You need to be specific about what the problem is. It wouldn't be logical if it was about improper usage of ad hominem since I just looked through the entire post and not a single other comment references ad hominem. You are either flat out lying or misremembering.
The more I read this the more it looks like someone pretending to be smart.