Opinions?

[ancient tree]

Maybe "Deployment:two random units un hand obtain +3 defense when they deploy"

[nimble yew]

tbh with you I wanted it to have synergies with overrun and naval support without the need of actual defense

[opal goblet]

blegh

[merry sapphire]

maybe I didn't understand something, but... if so, you can say "phantom defence" how it will work... for example, with ambush units? The ambush unit must have an attack of 4 or 7 to destroy this unit?

[nimble yew]

@merry sapphire the card text says to cards in hand, not on the board

[merry sapphire]

Sorry, my bad. Wrong read

[nimble yew]

so what do you think @merry sapphire

[merry sapphire]

However... As for, for example, the hammer order, can he destroy this unit with a single attack? But theoretically... the idea is interesting, although, as for me, at first glance it is ambiguous, at least in my understanding for sure

[nimble yew]

yes

because hammer does not account for its defense

I think

I may be wrong tho

[merry sapphire]

Like I said... at first glance, the idea of "phantom defense" is not immediately clear and makes ask questions

[nimble yew]

@merry sapphire I think changing it to only be counted by cards in your hand would solve the problem

[merry sapphire]

I suppose so...

[nimble yew]

well

lemme see if I can word it differently

[nimble yew]

@merry sapphire here's the solution

I had to remove guard, but it doesn't really matter tbh

hammer will now kill it aswell as other cards, but buff cards will still be able to buff stuff as they are not damage cards

[merry sapphire]

Hm... I think yes, it will be better this way. At least understanding comes faster