SHOP v0.99c (UPD: 27/12/2025) - Store & House Owner Patrol

[silent geyser]

here's how my code looks like right now

[summer igloo]

if not isDismissed then

uncomment this and let me know

[silent geyser]

don't look at the line numbers, I've run Format Document for your file

[summer igloo]

No worries

[silent geyser]

Now it properly resets when I go to the exterior, yet breaks in interiors

[summer igloo]

What companion do you use? I'm checking that with Rapport mod

[silent geyser]

Arvesa

[summer igloo]

so I have easy access to any companion

[silent geyser]

I also have Blademeister, but he works just fine. Probably because he's creature (dremora)

[summer igloo]

Hmmm, could you try please adding her full name to modules/config.lua in line 83?

config.DISABLED_NPC_NAMES = {"vasesius viciulus", "arvesa full name"}

I know Arvesa is quite problematic due to being scripted heavily

[silent geyser]

By "breaks" I mean unfollows her and treats as "guard that follows the player"

[summer igloo]

Ahhh

Then you have to add her name to that list 100%

That's a bug from like the beggining of SHOP, some scripted companions are not working good when not ignored by script

I will add her full name to next patch as well

[silent geyser]

"arvesa nadram"

yep, it seems to fix her now

[summer igloo]

Ufff, good that we have this discord for fast help

And that I had right now a bit of free time to jump in

config.DISABLED_NPC_NAMES - what this does essentially is these NPC names will be ignored for recruiting as following NPC

so if you meet any case of quest/companion problem, then it's the first way to go

(also worth reporting afterwards ^^ )

[silent geyser]

Also if you want to optimize filters a little, I might suggest changing ones that you check for exact matches to key-value ones

So that instead of

config.DISABLED_NPC_NAMES = {"vasesius viciulus", "arvesa nadram"}

You'd use

config.DISABLED_NPC_NAMES = {
  ["vasesius viciulus"] = true,
  ["arvesa nadram"] = true
}

Checking such lists is O(1) instead of O(n)

[summer igloo]

I'll add that to next patch, also thanks because it looks like companions still remove player invisibility chameleon effects (which should be fixed last patch)

[silent geyser]

So I'm having the same issue with a couple of followers from Astrologians Guild. Specifically girrel nadrhalor and ah-ge

And they're certainly not super-scripted as Arvesa

[summer igloo]

All right they will be added as well. I need to find a way to combat this without hand adding npcs to the list

Since this is tedious. Doable but tedious, especially when more and more companions are released

[silent geyser]

And nova from the same mod too xd

[summer igloo]

I need to seriously look into detecting ai companion package like hyacinth suggested already a month or two ago, just never got to accomplishing that in the first place

[silent geyser]

Isn't it just a matter of

function FollowsPlayer(player)
    local followedActor
    I.AI.forEachPackage(function (pkg)
        if pkg.type == "Follow" then
            followedActor = pkg.target
            return
        end
    end)

    local isSummon = string.find(self.recordId, "_summon$")
        or string.find(self.recordId, "_summ$")
    if isSummon then
        return StopAttackingLeader({ target = followedActor })
    end

    return followedActor == player
end

[summer igloo]

Hyacinth mentioned something about detecting mwscript package

Follow package is used to move NPCs by SHOP as far as I remember

Companion package is a different one

[silent geyser]

Is it?

[summer igloo]

Or shop is moving them by travel package…

[silent geyser]

It certainly was the only one package I saw while testing my mod

[summer igloo]

I would need to check that

[silent geyser]

Somehow I'm triggering this error

[summer igloo]

Yeah Ive also noticed that, I will need to rollback to earlier version and inspect because 0.99 has some mess in it, today I will have time to work on it and will make fixes🙌

[summer igloo]

I am working on the (untested) mess I've released as 0.99 and its' hotfixes. Rotations upon arrival to home position by the NPC is broken, a lot of errors are appearing. Sorry for this everyone, it was too rushed before christmas

After that, I will proceed to add Sleeping Darts as another mean of stunning NPCs :>

[narrow ether]

Ah, yes. Careful with these ones. Ranged stunning can be very OP so stealth games often try to limit this in one way or the other (and for good reasons).

[gaunt void]

It's fine. Better this way than working on something that will never see the light of day

[silent geyser]

Btw does your mod add any greetings to the npcs? I've started to get really annoyed at everyone in my own faction threatening me with guards and stuff

[narrow ether]

Hmm, I remember somebody reporting this as a bug

[silent geyser]

Like, the aggressive lines that tell me to fuck off or leave the place suddenly became reeeeeally frequent

[summer igloo]

Hmmm when you are in faction it shouldn't happen

I will investigate it, generally the private areas of NPCs will generate such responses (when not being in faction, or just being in a private area of a NPC or a shopkeeper etc), it activates upon coming to proximity of a bed which resembles private bedroom/quarters/sleeping area

[summer igloo]

This will be completely optional, and rather scarce, Im thinking of adding it solely as a loot drop, not actually purchasable

[silent geyser]

Pretty sure it happened when I was visiting Balmora temple while being on the first pilgrimage

[summer igloo]

I will take a look, I have a whole day today to work on my beloved SHOP

Looks like .99 was not successful, things broke and some that should be fixed possibly ain't

[summer igloo]

I think I might add temples blacklist to this function since pilgrims and temple patrons aren't usually the type of people to tell you to fuck off

And the responses are indeed harsh that are being used for this function

[silent geyser]

I suppose the responses are accurate... But they sound really out of place when they are said at the wrong places and times

[summer igloo]

This is true and will be filtered out

thanks for the suggestion 🙏

[silent geyser]

I suppose I will keep an eye on these misfires and report to you

[summer igloo]

Thinking about hostels as well

to turn that off for this particular script

[summer igloo]

This is very welcome

I need to actually download Arvesa mod to fix these pesky companions too

[summer igloo]

Okay, all bugs and errors (teleport, clearing states etc) are gone. Also couldn't reproduce the error log you sent SosnoviyBor (I suspect it might have confict with backstabs - although haven't checked and unsure). I'm moving on now to fix companion detection

[summer igloo]

I've managed to block off companions from being in the script thanks to your snippet. Thanks (hopefully it's working, I am in the same location with Arvesa as you added video earlier and she's following all the time, also companions finally do not remove invis/chameleon effects)

[silent geyser]

It's not in fact working and I've updated it since :)

function FollowsPlayer(player)
    if self.type == types.Player then
        return false
    end

    local followedActor
    I.AI.forEachPackage(function (pkg)
        if pkg.type == "Follow" then
            followedActor = pkg.target
            return
        end
    end)

    local followsPlayer = followedActor == player
    local isSummon = string.find(self.recordId, "_summon$")
        or string.find(self.recordId, "_summ$")

    local isFollowersSummon = false
    if not followsPlayer and isSummon then
        isFollowersSummon = FollowsPlayer(followedActor)
    end

    return followsPlayer or isFollowersSummon
end

[summer igloo]

I have modified it though

But without it it wouldnt work

I am adding filtering out bed script for hostels and temples and will upload new v

[silent geyser]

There were issues with detecting follower's summons. If your mod doesn't affect them, then you're probably fine

[summer igloo]

Yeah summons are untouched ^^

0.99c CHANGELOG
-Blacklisted temples and hostels from being affected by the bed script ("Get out" type voices near bedrooms)
-Fixed A LOT of errors from 0.99 release
-Companions now are properly fixed - no need to add any to the blacklist
-Fixed companions removing chameleon and invisibility effects from the player
https://www.nexusmods.com/morrowind/mods/57747

Sosnoviy - please let me know if it fixed companion problems

Since you had several instances of companions breaking out

[silent geyser]

Why won't you use Nexus' builting changelog feature?

[summer igloo]

I will sort it out on 1.0 release ^^

SHOP v0.99c (UPD: 27/12/2025) - Store & House Owner Patrol

[narrow ether]

0.99c

[summer igloo]

It was a fuckin mess today

Spent half day debugging my mistakes 😛

Although now I am very happy, got rid of all red errors in the logs

(hopefully)

[summer igloo]

I've moved changelog there as you suggested, was a 3 seconds task

[silent geyser]

🧐

[summer igloo]

Skill issue 😄

Nah, must be that you have cached old version of site

[narrow ether]

This changelog gave me an idea for a meme

[summer igloo]

It's readable 😄 I will fix it later

[narrow ether]

Soon(tm)

[summer igloo]

Sooner than later for sure ^^

[summer igloo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tncmrnfboKw
Sleep Darts - only able to get them through loot from thief type npc classes. Only stuns when NPC doesn't see you. Thinking about adding it to Thieves Guild Vendors from level 20

[silent geyser]

https://tenor.com/view/keel-over-falling-cat-funny-meme-gif-7534335698802884928

[summer igloo]

Yeah falls down quite fast 😛

[narrow ether]

I would think about implementing restrictions, e.g. making them useless against armoured characters or sth

or lowering efficiency

[summer igloo]

It doesnt work in combat, it doesn't work when NPC sees the player. Are there any more restrictions needed? Considering it will be dropped only 1-2 darts on the drop. (1% chance shared between all droppable items by SHOP)

[narrow ether]

it's still auto-success, basically

sth which blacjack doesn't have

[summer igloo]

You still need to hit with marksman

[narrow ether]

limited availability is a good call although not sure whether it should be just loot

[summer igloo]

if you miss, it's not applied

I mean if the roll for applying the hit from engine fails

[summer igloo]

Was thinking of adding it into crafting framework

[narrow ether]

how long does the KO last?

[summer igloo]

With extremely high materials requirements

I think it uses base 45sec stun, I think I will be able to finetune it to work like blackjack or hand to hand

Since I had to create a new effect for it. Base Sleep Spell Mod didnt have onStrike enchant

[narrow ether]

well, since it's not KO and doesn't depend on your skill but the substance/magic in the dart

maybe NPCs stats should matter

level, endurance, sth

[summer igloo]

I will think about some formula

[narrow ether]

if it's poison then maybe poison resistance

if it's magic then maybe magicka resistance

to make it more varied

less safe

and more uncertain

[icy bluff]

i like that its just the stun because its a ranged attack so it balances that, youd have to close the distance quickly to apply the blackjack

[narrow ether]

ranged attack makes it far easier to use safely

[summer igloo]

Dunno how to balance that nicely

[narrow ether]

yeah it's tricky

[summer igloo]

Probably half of the stun time will be applied

To have atleast some drawback

[narrow ether]

Instead of the timer being constant, it should be a formula. Even a basic one would be better than nothing, e.g. if you use some NPC level modifier

and maybe add some inherent RNG

so you can never be sure how long it lasts

[summer igloo]

Basically how it is now with blackjack

[narrow ether]

yeah but with lower values

it also makes sense to check for magicka or poison resistance depending on what it is

[summer igloo]

Tbh it's a command humanoid spell lol

Pre-made effect made within the limitations of spell system api

So I guess magicka applies here, although for making them with crafting I would go for Poison ingredients

[narrow ether]

I mean the stun duration/chance as I assume you have full control over those

[summer igloo]

No, that needs to be coded

Until spell api is exposed, it all will be jank methods sadly

[narrow ether]

wait, you control the Blackjack formula. I assume that you can do the same with Sleep Dart formula.

[summer igloo]

Yeah, I mean at the moment for the dart it uses default timer

[cloud stone]

How did you end up dealing with companions unregistering when going into an interior?

[summer igloo]

There is companion_detection.lua file, everything regarding that it’s there. I’ve modified code snippet Sosnoviy posted here. I am on my phone now so cannot explain more in detail without looking at it ^^

It pretty much checks for Follow and Escort packages and ignores these NPCs for the whole script

[silent geyser]

Yesterday I was thinking of decoupling follower detection from my mod for the sake of simplicity, reusability and optimisation. Maybe you'd be interested in it :)

[cloud stone]

Yeah trying to figure out a way to do this without attaching a script to every actor in the game haha

[silent geyser]

🧐

Like, in global scope?

I doubt you can do that, since the only way I know of detecting the follower is by checking their AI packages. Which in turn can be checked only in local scipt

[silent geyser]

I just update a flag on AI package update and onActive

[summer igloo]

Can you check my script also? Is it a lot worse?

[silent geyser]

I'll check it a bit later

[summer igloo]

Thank u very much 🙌🙏

[eager stone]

Hey there. Using the latest version, it seems like many areas where you have a companion to clear out a dungeon (like the quest The Necromancer of Vas) break due to SHOP.

The person you're supposed to work with stops being a follower immediately due to SHOP

The quests still work OK, but you lose out on any support

I ran into this in both vanilla dungeons and TR areas

[summer igloo]

Thanks for reporting this, I will test it and come back with conclusion/solution. And thanks for using my mod ❤️

[silent geyser]

Yeah that bug with onfollowing player's followers is back again

Specifically it happened when I entered a dungeon, killed a few monsters and the combat ended

Though I encountered an interesting interaction - followers picked locks for me. Due to bug, obviously. But the idea of them picking locks for you is really cool

[icy bluff]

haha nice emergent behavior

[silent geyser]

And even though I've rolled back to 0.98a of SHOP, it allowed me to have just 1 follower

[silent geyser]

It would be really cool if it was expanded into it's own thing. With security skill and lockpicks taken in consideration

[icy bluff]

yeah its a cool idea, like in some party based iso rpgs.

[summer igloo]

I am almost sure it gets broken in „hostile” categorized cells and in combat switches. After New Year I will be able to look closer on this

[summer igloo]

Sounds great but it is a bug at the moment, in what exact situation did it happen? I guess I didn’t exclude some condition for it (and also to disable it for companions lol)

[summer igloo]

So much mods to make and so little time 😄 although sounds like a nice idea and totally doable

I would need to modify just a slight bit and give a button activation to give the order to companion

[versed plume]

You pointed me towards this when asking about traps, so I figure I'll ask a few things I was wondering about...

Could there a way to separate magical and physical locks, perhaps as Lock and Seal? This would allow security to be relevant in the face of Alteration. Could make thief playthroughs more interesting without having to self impose a "no alteration or unlock scrolls" rule.

Probes I can still see being useful if traps gain the ability to trigger an AoE effect - in such a case, disarming it may be preferable to using Telekinesis depending on the situation.

[summer igloo]

Hey, with SHOP you can already lock the doors as a thief with Keylock items and it is already implemented and working. And it is security influenced and Keylock item quality influenced.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMrlCHsx530

Disarming trap failure which can trigger a trap is a great idea, I am adding it to SHOP todo list. Thanks for suggestion

I highly recommend reading the whole readme on NexusMods to get a feeling what's already available. The list is vast.

You can stun NPCs, NPCs can open locked doors, NPCs follow you around in their houses and shops, NPCs tell you to get out from their private areas, NPCs can remove invisibility and chameleon if too close to player to imitate being detected

[versed plume]

Was... mostly asking about a way to change Lock and Unlock spells to not completely invalidate lockpicks by replacing them with Seal and Unseal, so that whether you use Security or Alteration is based on if the lock is physical, magical, or both.

Placing traps via trap kits could work for a new security use, and having AoE traps could introduce a reason not to invalidate probes existing by just using Telekinesis to trigger it remotely.

Like, if you have an escort and you come across a trap, you'll want to use a probe and not just trigger it with telekinesis because you could damage your escort.

It'd be a way to help keep Security valuable as a skill and not completely invalidate it via magic.

[summer igloo]

Placing two different locks is not possible with the engine I think. But keylock is practically what you are talking about here - keylock = physical lock, Lock spell = magical lock.

[versed plume]

Ah, so a new effect you could layer onto objects/doors isn't possible yet in OpenMW? Are keylocks not unlockable via spells?

[summer igloo]

They are unlockable with spells, just like locked spell doors are unlockable with lockpicks

New lock layer is nothing I've heard of tbh, and there is really niche use case. SHOP npc lock opening divides into 3 categories - combat, magic, stealth. Depending on the NPC stats, it either bashes, unlock with spell or lockpicks the door

[versed plume]

Yeah, adding Seal/Unseal isn't as simple as it sounds either - as part of the mod, you'd have to actually make it relevant, meaning you'd need to go into the game and figure out "which lock should become a seal instead, and which door should have both a lock AND a seal?", and then do the same for Tamriel Rebuilt content.

But it'd do a lot for keeping magic from just completely invalidating the Security skill.

[summer igloo]

This would be done on random basis if ever

SHOP does a lot already to un-invalidate security skill

[versed plume]

If something I implement, I'd look at where it would matter situationally, and would be random assignment for all other cases.

Like, the locks in the mage guild or telvani would become seals, while thieves guild and fighters guild would stay locks, while other places would be more randomized as an example.

[summer igloo]

Locking doors have no meaning without SHOP to be honest, it just locks out the doors which NPCs will never open. With SHOP, the lock magnitude changes a lot vs the NPC who has to open it, making the open time varied by the lock magnitude

[versed plume]

Since to me it addresses the "what is the user more likely to apply here?" when done based on faction location.

[summer igloo]

so it encourages to use better lock spell/better keylock and have better skill

[versed plume]

Speaking of... it's called SHOP, right?

I am working on a mercantile based character for my next playthrough...

Off chance this lets us run a shop?

Could be cool to have some procedurally generated orders to fill.

Like, say someone comissions I enchant an axe, or needs X numbers of potions that heal at least Y amount.

[summer igloo]

Noo not really, it's more of AI overhaul and thief overhaul mod

[versed plume]

lol gotcha. Definitely worth keeping track of, thanks for letting me know about it :D

[summer igloo]

No worries, hopefully you will have fun with it one day

[gaunt void]

Imagine a usecase for "re-locking" chests so people don't get suspicious

[flint mango]

hi, writer here

please.

[summer igloo]

That sounds great with Burglary Overhaul working together with SHOP

[summer igloo]

Hm?

[flint mango]

and if you forget you immediately have 1 million bounty/j

[flint mango]

it's mostly a personal issue but the amount of times most storytelling just handwave away an unlocked chest where it wasn't is brain melting

maybe it's the autism but like you can tell when something was Closed Different.

[summer igloo]

Well I definitely added this to future to-do to work together with synergy for Burglary Overhaul to not apply bounty for the items gone from chests and re-locked by the player (with adding rising % chance of bounty added for these items when re-locked the chest with a lock level further from the original lock magnitude)

[narrow ether]

Very interesting idea

[icy bluff]

Skrow the blackjack is so much fun, thank you

[summer igloo]

Great to hear that!

[narrow ether]

@summer igloo don't know if you are interested in the feature but how about guards reacting to you putting skooma, moon sugar and other illegal goods on the floor? It's always been weird that a merchant refuses you service, you put skooma on the floor and even if a guard sees it, no reaction at all. At the very least items should be confiscated.

[icy bluff]

I was just thinking about this too. something like Sheathe Your Weapon but its Sheathe Your Sugar

would make sense as part of shop but could be its own mod too

[narrow ether]

yeah, SHOP does a lot with detection and AI so this might be a nice feature here

[gaunt void]

it'd be better if npcs just didn't know about your sugar

and only informed the guards when you tried selling it

[summer igloo]

This always intrigued me how they were possible to see inside of your whole bag 😄

[gaunt void]

I think my suggestion would be more in line with shop

[summer igloo]

I will look into it, dunno if I can stop the detection but 99% sure I can do something when skooma/sugar is on the floor or anywhere around these npcs

[gaunt void]

Sure, it's just the service refusal dialogue for traders

[summer igloo]

And sorry everyone for no updates, last days I was busy with irl things, hopefully from tommorow I can start working back on the mods

🙌

[gaunt void]

So, basically you tell them not to care and detect via code when you sold them something nasty.

[summer igloo]

I am just not sure if thats open to lua api

If it is then that is a no brainer to add

[gaunt void]

removing the service refusal would be a dialogue edit, the second part would be a check of your inventory against the traders

[summer igloo]

I will check if it can be done luaside which I would prefer. Although shop also has .omwaddon so pretty much everything is possible with SHOP at this point

[narrow ether]

guard could also confiscate Dwemer misc items, raw ebony, raw glass etc.

but I guess it's just an item list. Shouldn't be hard to do if the funtionality is in

[summer igloo]

Ideally I would also love to add when you wear dwemer stuff then you are halted but I guess that would be a little too much

[narrow ether]

there are some characters who walk openly with Dwemer armour. Even in Ebonheart.

so it doesn't work like that. There is also the "newly discovered" clause, ha ha

https://www.nexusmods.com/morrowind/mods/47456 check this mod for a nice list

it works great for service refusal but of course, if you put raw ebony on the floor, nobody gives a shit

just as with skooma

[summer igloo]

I have this installed actually

Like I said, I will look into that and will serve a solution, one way or another

🙌

[lone nymph]

.

[summer igloo]

Hm?

[raw axle]

@summer igloo Hi, in a discussion a few weeks earlier about your mod you told me to write about either bugs or comments here. I got the opportunity to interact a bit more with SHOP, and noticed the following:
-Shop owners in small spaces/cells that serve both as a bedroom and a shop, for example in small shops in Vivec, will tell you to leave as you peruse their wares.
-Areas like monasteries, that are "semi-private" as except for bedrooms, they don't have a "shopping" area and people are free to wander in most places. Homalayan monastery is an example of this, several other places of cult, people behave like shop owners too.
-Once while doing an "Exterminate the Brutes" quest, I had to kill an NPC in his home. He continued to yell at me even in death to leave his house.

I'm not knowledgeable about the complexity of modding in general, I hope though this can help to refine some aspects of an already accomplished mod.

[summer igloo]

Hey, these are some neat previously unknown bug reports! Thank you for that, be reassured that these will be fixed when I get back to working on SHOP eventually 🙌

[raw axle]

Thanks, you're welcome. 🙂

[narrow ether]

BTW this is random but have you thought about some alternative name? Maybe a secondary one for Nexus purposes at least. Finding this mod there is painful. This is what happens when I write "shop" is the search bar:

[summer igloo]

Any suggestion for name is welcome 😄

This was the one I could come up with fairly fast

[neat mantle]

"Loss Prevention"

[summer igloo]

Loss Prevention - AI and Thief Gameplay Overhaul, might do the justice

[tame harbor]

there's someone watching me. i can tell.

[summer igloo]

This one hits and fits really hard 😱

[gaunt void]

Supervised shops

[round dagger]

What would that be an acronym for

[gaunt void]

hmm, oh

Anti-Theft

[round dagger]

But what would THAT be an acronym for 🤔

[gaunt void]

A.N.T.I.-T.H.E.F.T., Argonian-Proof Nocturnal Trespass Inhibitor - Thief Humbling Experiences For swiTs

[summer igloo]

This one I've actually used for some of the lua files naming convention :>

[summer igloo]

I know the list is massive, let's pick a winner. I cannot decide myself 😄

[icy bluff]

Nowhere to Hide is pretty snappy, Anti-Theft is the clearest but We're Watching You, Scum just has that Morrowind charm

[summer igloo]

There are really good candidates, truly. Im also closest to the last one on the list ^^ But let's see

[silent geyser]

Anti-Theft gang

Utilitarian naming

[icy bluff]

Scum: Anti-Theft AI
Best of both worlds

[summer igloo]

Or
We're Watching You, Scum – Anti-Theft AI Overhaul (OpenMW) (but I'm really biased to that voice line 😄 - need unbiased votes haha)

[round dagger]

SCUM seems like something you could turn into an acronym 👀

[neat mantle]

Yeah I think this is the best way for SEO

[round dagger]

Anti-theft was my second choice

[dense bobcat]

Hi. I noticed a small problem with a trader in a "Suran, Ralds Oril: Trader". He stays behind a counter, and when I go upstairs he tries to follow me, but unable to open the counter. Maybe it's possible to fix.

[west lava]

How are interiors being chosen for this behavior? I'm experiencing a lot of "get out!"s in all kinds of places. Or is that some kind of interference from another mod?

[summer igloo]

Added to the bug list for fixing (and for now if it's a big problem, you can add this npc name into config.lua file to the list of ignored NPCs)

[summer igloo]

The last version got broken on the detection of the NPC spawn point - the thing that tries to emulate private areas/rooms is bed detection. What got broken last update is that it should ignore the NPCs which are spawned near their bed area. This will be fixed back in the next update

[brazen depot]

Morgen @summer igloo , is there (or can be added) a way to check through an interface that noc is knocked out? Currently sneak is good now thinks that noc starts combat when you knock it ou (since you didnt kill it) and kicks you outa sneak, which is undesirable

[summer igloo]

I’ll fix it for you ^^ but not this week, I’m going to vacays tommorow so that’ll need to wait just a little bit 😊

[summer igloo]

You can get away though if you’ll try to look up the sleep spell (knockout) by the ids and if actor has it then do not kick off the sneak.

The id is detd_sleep ? Or something like that, it’s in the sleep code

[brazen depot]

Oh yes thats perfect, 👍

Thanks

[summer igloo]

You’re welcome 🫡😊

[silent geyser]

Seems like SHOP is breaking Follower Commands. When any command with Travel package is issued, follower loses its Follow package

Easiest way to reproduce the bug:

1. Install Follower Commands and Attend Me (to see exactly when the Follow package is lost)
2. Issue a Travel command by looking into a wall or ground and pressing C
3. Follower package gets lost as soon as Travel package is sent

[summer igloo]

I hope I can find some time to finally fix the bugs in SHOP, thanks for report I'll see what can be done about that. Still need to implement your Follower Util into SHOP

[narrow ether]

https://tenor.com/view/steppenläufer-tumbleweed-windy-gif-12143667

Sorry, couldn't resist

One day SHOP will return

[silent geyser]

as we say
the rat hanged themselves (in the fridge)

[summer igloo]

Give me like a week or two, definitely not participating in week 4 modathon. Need to unburden myself of the backlog

[narrow ether]

understandable. It's not important whether it comes in a month or in two months. Just that it comes. There are many good ideas in SHOP and it will be good to do some cleaning 🧹.

[summer igloo]

It scares me though, so many ai behavior mods have been released since the last time I was working on SHOP😅 hopefully FDU from Sosnovyi will help with follower problem but Foxunder mods and Sit Down are another thing

[icy bluff]

Yeah Vaults Restricted is a cool mod with a similar goal to SHOP but smaller in scope. And with Liam's behaviour ai coming soon too it might be best to wait and see how that affects things 🤔 would you consider seperating the blackjack into a separate mod?

[summer igloo]

I might do that

We’ll see. It will need a major refactor anyway. Gonna be a pain the butt

[icy bluff]

Fair

[narrow ether]

If it worked, I'm sure that some players would use blackjack mod as standalone. SHOP is big and the bigger the mod is, the greater the chance that some features will turn people off and they will skip it... or even miss the fact that the feature is there.