navinci

[visual ginkgo]

Please be patient

Our volunteers look into many questions every day; sometimes it takes them a little while to answer.

Pro tip: you can rename the thread title with `.tr <thread name>`

Make it descriptive, including relevant context, but also to the point. This way you improve your chances of getting a more relevant and specific answer.

[orchid iron]

That is correct ✅

[sharp thicket]

Am I missing something there or is it all there's to accord?

[prisma talon]

être is only not subjected to gender/number agreement when the COI is before it, not when the COD is

elles se sont vues

ils se sont parlé

[orchid iron]

Ah bon ? C'est pourtant pas ce que je vois là 🤔
https://www.bescherelle.com/faq/comment-accorder-le-participe-passe-dun-verbe-pronominal/

[prisma talon]

et pourtant

si le COD est avant, accord, s'il n'y a que le COI avant, pas d'accord

[dry pelican]

les verbes pronominaux fonctionnent comme les autres verbes avec avoir

donc si il y a un COD avant le verbe, il y a un accord
sinon, pas d'accord

[sharp thicket]

https://tenor.com/view/betty-white-math-calculating-confused-golden-girls-gif-27641696

[prisma talon]

The distinction between essentially and accidentally pronominal verbs doesn't change anything

it's just that there are no reflexive only verbs that use indirect object pronouns