#danl172
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Our volunteers look into many questions every day; sometimes it takes them a little while to answer.
Make it descriptive, including relevant context, but also to the point. This way you improve your chances of getting a more relevant and specific answer.
N'étais pas for je, tu and n'était pas for il, elle and on
Je n'étais pas
Tu n'étais pas
Il/elle/on n'était pas
Adding to the comment above, verbs agree according to person, number, and tense. While person information can include gender, it's irrelevant unless you're dealing with compound tenses where the past participle is involved like passé composé or plus-que-parfait. In those cases, the past participle does agree with gender and number, and that's because past participles are adjectives
^^ for the verbs like se sentir or se lever
Ex:
« il vient, elle vient
ils viennent, elles viennent »
Agreement here is with person (third person), number (singular).
« il est venu, elle est venue
ils sont venus, elles sont venues »
The auxiliaries still agree only in person and number but the past participle here acts like an adjective so it agrees with the gender and number of the noun it's modifying.
elle s'est sentie
elle s'est levée
il s'est levé
and also for direct objects
je l'ai mangé (masculin item)
je l'ai mangée (feminin item)
its a bit of a nightmare actually but from what i know even natives struggle with that part
C'est très serviable, merci beaucoup à tous
esp when we get to things like elle s'est fait voler because se faire is an indirect object not a direct object
but elle s'est faite belle
Yes, though for avoir verbs the agreement is for the direct object behind the verb whereas what I gave is for intransitives without objects
to help you out too at least for indicatif (not composé) je will never end in t
Pronominal verbs follow the direct objects rule, they basically just act like normal avoir verbs
It's more that the COD of « se faire » is the infinitive so it's always going to be invariable. For « elle s'est faite belle », the adjective here is a complement of the direct object « se ».
Elle s'est fait voler
Elle s'est faite belle
Bold = Indirect object
Underlined = Direct object
yes
This applies for first and second person, always
so when it's a pronominal and indirect it doesn't agee with gender
But those concepts are pretty advanced, the gist is still that conjugation takes tense, person and number into account, but not gender
-t/-ø is a characteristic of third person conjugations
Neither will the subjunctive
or conditional
yea it's never t for first person haha
Basically, you can get by with this pattern:
-s = sing. second
-t/-ø = third in general though it always ends with T for the plural
-ons = pl. first
-ez = pl. second
what is ø
Nothing
Nothing
It's only the first that's a bit random because they can either have no ending like « je parle » or have second person endings (je finis)
je parle, je finis, je rends, je prends, j'écris, je conduis, j'atteins
…okay maybe -s is a first person ending except for first group conjugations (-er)
on another note aside from the -er and -ir i would advise anyone not to try and memorize the rules
It's a lot more useful to have third as -is as well since the vast majority of third group conjugations for the first person end in -s save for the really irregulars of « avoir, pouvoir, vouloir, etc »
learn each verb by itself for the 3rd group a
and eventually it gets obvious because they're all kind of patterned off each other
Third group conjugations do have patterns it's just that there's a tonne of them
And there are exceptions
For first and second groups, the standard conjugation is so common that you can memorise them and have it apply to 99% of all verbs in those categories
Like the derivatives of dire
For the third, there's just too many subgroups
The only exception for the first group is aller and for the second it's haïr I think
and subgroups within subgroups like what Tiyan said with « dire » since some plural second person conjugations end up like dire (vous dites, vous redites) and some regularised it (vous médisez, vous prédisez, vous contredisez)
haïr follows the pattern
partir, sortir, dormir, couvrir, offrir, cueillir, etc don't
yea those are the fake 2nd groupers
je hais
nous haïssons
HAHAHAHAHA
That is the pattern :
Je finis
Nous finissons
They are in the third group
je réfléchis
nous réfléchissons
My favorite is maudire which conjugates like a second group verb for some reason
There's a stem change in the plural present which infects the rest of the tenses
Sorta, it depends which authority you follow. Traditional French grammarians have divided it into three conjugation groups: first (-er), second (-ir), third (everything else); Learner material instead divided it into four conjugation groups: first (-er), second (-ir), third (-re, rendre pattern) + irregulars
Yes but it's pronunciation is weird
je hais = je e
nous haïssons = nu a.i.son
This doesn't happen to any other 2nd group verb
I wasn't referring to the -ss-
je fleuris
nous fleurissons
Pronounced as fini, but hais is pronounced as e
The verb is « haïr »
you have to keep that tréma when the stem changes
that's not an exception, just how the verb functions
What, are you going to say that every -cer and -ger verb is an exception because their plural first conjugation ends in -eons/-çons instead of -ons?
That's but a spelling convention
Fair enough but that doesn't warrant enough of a charge to consider it 'irregular' or an 'exception'